Document zdbpp3n68dgEZjgaG72NVBK06

1 (d) the quantitative percentage of each chemical component of the brake linings under each trade or 2 brand name; 3 (e) if asbestos was included m the composition of the brake linings which defendant manufactured 4 under any trade or brand name, please state: 5 (l) The type of asbestos fiber (i.e., amosite, chrysotile, crocidolite) used m the brake lin 6 ings under each trade or brand name; 7 (ii) The quantitative percentage of asbestos fiber used in the brake linings under each trade 8 or brand name; 9 (m) The years during which asbestos fiber was included in the composition of the brake linings 10 under each trade or brand name; 11 RESPONSE TO INTERROGATORY NO. 118: 12 See Wagner's response to Interrogatory No. 9. 13 INTERROGATORY NO. 119: 14 At any time during the period 1948 to 1978, did defen dant distribute automobile brake linings or brake assemblies? 15 If so, please state: 16 (a) the trade or brand name(s) under which the brake linings or brake assemblies were marketed; 17 (b) the years during which the brake linings or 18 brake assemblies, under each trade or brand name, were manufactured; 19 (c) the date each product was withdrawn from the 20 market, if such is the case; 21 (d) the quantitative percentage of each chemical component of the brake linings under each trade or 22 brand name; 23 (e) if asbestos was included in the composition of the brake linings which defendant manufactured 24 under any trade or brand name, please state: (i) The type of asbestos fiber (i.e., amosite, chrysotile, crocidolite) used in the brake lin ings under each trade or brand name; (n) The quantitative percentage of asbestos fiber used in the brake linings under each trade or brand name; 45