Document zdZXXExVde5qknLmGnXL7wbb0

AIA-98 ASBESTOS INFORMATION ASSOCIATION momtmamcmca 1833 K Stmt. N.W, WasMRgtsn, O.C. 20008 (202) 223-4885 EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE MEETING Tuesday, September 7, 1976 Stouffer1s National Center Hotel Arlington, Virginia The meeting was called to order at 2:05 P.M. at Stouffer's National Center Hotel, Arlington, Virginia, Present were: Thomas A Dougherty George Barge John H. Marsh Dimitry Poutiatine William C. Thurber C. Fred Workman R. H. Mereness Certain-teed Corp.; President, AIA/NA Atlas Asbestos Company Raybestos-Mannattan, Inc. Johns-Manvilie Corp. Union Carbide Corp. Nicolet, Inc. AIA/NA Executive Director others: Joseph A. Artabane, Jr., Esq. Adrian C. May, Jr., Esq. Guy G. Gabrielson, Jr. A. H. Fay Richard T. Davis B. J. Pigg ' Cadwalader, Wickersham & Taft Cadwalader, Wickersham & Taft Nicolet, Inc, Chairman, Asbestos Regulation Task Force Past President, AIA/NA Frank C. Frant2 & Co. . AIA/NA Administrative Assistant Minutes On motion, minutes of previous meeting, August 19, 1976, were approved as submitted. " Financial Report Financial Report for calendar (fiscal) year 1976 as of ' August 31, 1976 was distributed and reviewed. Mr. Barge pointed out that the total negative variance under accrual accounting system was closing and that end-year projections indicate ex penditures will be within current budget. As of August 31, the Association had total assets of $93,660; liabilities of $48,780 and net worth of $44,880. Mr. Davis explained that the current PRODUCED Jffl - 83 AIA-98 Page 2 dues rate for 1976 (2.5 mills), approved at the March 26 Board of Directors meeting, had been applied to third and fourth quarter billings. On motion, the financial report va's approved as submitted. '' Mr. Dougherty reintroduced the matter of possible audit of the Association's finances, an item carried over from the June 9, 1976 Executive Committee meeting. Following discussion, it was agreed that the Board of Directors at meeting Sept. 8 should determine whether an audit should be conducted. Revision of Association Sv-Lavs Mr. Dougherty invited attention to Draft IX of Association By-Laws. The draft was forwarded to members by AIA/NA memorandum of August 27. He suggested that time limitations at the Board of Directors and Annual Meetings September 8 precluded detailed discussion and action at that time. He proposed that the Executive Committee conduct a line-by-line review of the Draft and that the Association's counsel incorporate possible changes for a final draft be fore submission to members, the refined draft to be forwarded as soon as practicable to members by the Executive Director for consideration and formal action at the December Board of Directors meeting. A lengthy discussion followed, with Association counsel noting agreed upon changes. - Comments by Counsel on Injunctive Relief Proposed OSHA Standards Mr. May spoke to the possibility of seeking injunctive relief'.from OSHA in the event the public hearing for the proposed revision to the asbestos (manufacturing) standard is scheduled separate from a proposed asbestos standard for the construction industry. He stressed economic feasibility as significant basis for such'action. Reference was made to the Association's letter dated July 27 to Dr. Morton Corn reiterating primary recommendation of AIA/NA response to ^ OSHA on proposed manufacturing standard that simultaneous consider ation' of manufacturing standard and yet to be proposed construction standard be affected.The Executive Director noted ho response to the letter had been received. Following discussion, it was agreed that a special meeting of the Executive Committee should be convened to further consider this subject in event formal noti fication is received that an exclusive public hearing on the manufacturing standard is scheduled. Remarks of Executive Director Attention was invited to Association's response dated _ _ Sept. 1 to Consumer Product Safety Commission (CPSC) on petition filed July 15 by Natural Resources Defense Council,Inc. and _ Consumers Union of U.S.A., Inc. to ban patching compounds (taping, spackling and joint sealing) containing asbestos, copy in folders. It was noted that CPSC acknowledged receipt of AIA/NA's comments on September 3. Appreciation was expressed to Dr. Rhodes, ' AIA-98 Page 3 Mr. Gabrielson and Mr. Fay for their assistance in develop ment of this response. A report on plans for the Third Annual Industry-Government Conference September 8-9 was given, including logistic arrange ments, attendance information, and estimated income. The Execu tive Director said he had knowledge of one company, Nilfisk of America, lac., a manufacturer of industrial suction equipment, which planned to display products by use of a hospitality suite. He emphasized that the Association had advised the Nilfisk repre sentative that his activity was not to be construed as an en dorsement by the Association of the products. The Executive Director reported that he had been in contact with Mr. Norman Rhodes regarding retransmittal of TBA supple mental data as had been requested at Executive Committee meeting of August 19. The data has not been received to date but was expected momentarily. (Note: Data was received September 10 and forwarded same date under cover of memorandum to Mr. Gabrielson Dr. Weill, and Dr. Xotin for review prior to being submitted to OSHA.) On motion, a bill from Dr. Philip E. Enterline in amount of $1,142.00 for services and transportation expenses in support of the Association's Aegal/Medieal Research Program (literature research pertaining to asbestos and health) was approved for --paymentTM International Asbestos Information Conference Mr. Marsh proposed that discussion of the benefits of AIA/NA membership in the International Asbestos Information Conference be delayed until the October 14 meeting of the Executive Committee following his meeting with IAIC standing committee members on October 12 in London. ' Mr. Marsh reported on the International Metalworkers Federation World Conference on Health Hazards in Metal Working^ Industries held in Oslo, Norway, August 16-19, 1976. A significant aspect of the meeting was a resolution calling for 0.1 f/cc per missible limit for exposure to asbestos dust. Mr- Marsh said. Dr. Irving J. Selikoff, Chairman of the Federation's Scientific Advisory Committee advised Dr. Klaus Robock that he supported this action in order-to prevent a resolution prohibiting the use of asbestos. It was pointed out that the meeting underscored . international concerns regarding asbestos-health issues. Mr. Marsh said he will attend the IAIC October 12 meeting in London as the Association's representative to discuss permanent office location and naming of secretary general for the Standing Committee preliminary to further consideration at the IAIC Con ference in Hamburg November 4-5. PrtOu AIA-9r8. Page 4 "N Work in Connection with OSHA Asbestos .... Standards Mr. Gabrielson said there had been no change in status of OSHA's proposed revision to the asbestos standard (manufacturing) since his report at the August 19 meeting of the Executive Com mittee. The Inflationary Impact Statement (IIS) prepared by CONSAD Research Corp. is yet to be "certified" by Department of Labor. Reference was made to Mr. Mereness' comments on re transmittal of TBA's supplemental data. Mr. Gabrielson reiterated that Mr. Norman Rhodes and Dr. Steve Holmes would be available to testify _ at public hearing on the proposed standard. He said Mr. Jerry Hebb will also be available to testify in suoport of the Weston study. " Mr. Gabrielson reviewed his efforts to date regarding possible contractors to perform an independent study of the construction industry in anticipation of OSHA's issuance of a proposed asbestos standard. He said four bids had been received in response to the request for proposal. They are: Contractor ' Phase I Phase II Phase III Total Equitable Environmental Health, Inc. '.$40,900 Woodbury, N. Y. _ $60,000 $35,000 "\ $135,1.-0 Betz Environmental Engineers, Inc. Plymouth Meeting, PA 46,880 53,780 21,450 122,110 The Franklin-Hahnemann Institute Philadelphia, PA - 37,600 Charles T. Main,Inc. Boston, Mass. 30-40,000 26,000 35,800 90,000 99,400 120-130,000 Mr. Gabrielson recommended and it was agreed that no further consideration should be given to bid of Charles T. Main, Inc. since their response did not indicate a level of qualification to perform. He reviewed the strength and weaknesses of the re maining three proposals. A discussion as to possible funding _ alternatives' followed.- Mr. Thurber recommended that Mr. Gabrielson be authorized to select one firm from the three remaining consultants jand enter into a contract for Phase I of the construction study _ with an appropriate cancellation clause included in event financial' support is not forthcoming. He further proposed funding for Phase I (estimate $50,000) be initially defrayed from the Association's reserve funds and ultimately from primary segments of the industry or, alternatively, by an 18% assessment of 1976 membership dues. PRODUCED JM -83 AIA-98 Page 5 Funding far phases II and III to be included in the 1977 budget which could be accomplished by maintaining the same dues rate for 1977 as is currently the rate (2.5 mills) for 1976. The proposed 18% assessment for 1976 to be formally acted on by ballot vote which will .be forwarded to members with requested return date of October 12, 1976. On motion, the recommendation was approved to be presented at Board of Directors meeting September 8. It was pointed out that the funds to support Phase I of the study may be provided as result of a meeting of chief executive officers of a number of member companies tentatively set for October 7 in New York City (concept approved at August 19 Executive Committee meeting) . Solicited contri butions from non-member companies and increased dues from a possible associate member category could also offset study expenses in 1977. Mr. Gabrielson said to date he had not been successful in obtaining an invitation to speak with the directors of the Quebec Asbestos Mining Association as regards the AIA/MA programs and expenses in connection with OSSA standards setting. He said the meeting of the Legal/Medical Research Committee in New York City on August 24 was encouraging and considerable work had been accomplished by Special Counsel, Wendell B. Alcorn, Esc. and Dr. Enterline. He stated he had mat with Mr. Alcorn and Dr. Weill to review a potential list of expert medical witnesses. It is planned that these individuals would be available to testify as might be required by member companies named as defendants in asbestos-related litigation cases. Mr. Alcorn will discuss this matter with the named individuals at the earliest opportunity. Medical Witnesses could serve two functions: (1) testify as to the actual health of a plantiff, and (2) review the work being accomplished by Dr. ` Enterline and testify on state of the medical art. Responding to Mr. Thurber, Mr. Gabrielson discussed status of multi-district panel approach to pending federal cases. The Judicial Panel on Multidistrict litigation has ordered the parties in various asbestos products liability suits to show cause why these suits should not be consolidated for pretrial proceedings. Mr. Gabrielson referred to a memorandum on the subject which had been prepared by Cadwalader, Wickersham & Taft in New York". The "work product" is available to AIA/NA members upon request from company attorneys. He explained that such memoranda are considered protected from discovery. He said it was Cadwalader's opinion that it would probably be in the industry's best interest to oppose the multi-district procedure and seek separate trials. Mr. Gabrielson stated many insurance.carriers including those of mining companies in Canada, had registered opposition to the procedure. PRODUCED m - S3 AIA-98 Page 6 In regard to "work product" memoranda, Mr. Gabrielson explained that it is necessary to request each member company of the Association, other than those who have members on the Legal/Medical Research Committee , to designate an associate member of Committee. The matter will be presented at the September 8 Board of Directors meeting. Agenda for Board of Directors and Annual Meeting Agenda were approved as presented. Other Business Mr. Dougherty presented the following schedule for Executive Committee and Board of Directors meetings during the ensuing work year: Executive Committee Board of Directors October 14, 1976 November 11, 1976 December 8, 1976 January 13, i977 February 10, 1977 March 9, 1977 April 14, 1977 May 12, 1977 June 8, 1977 July 14, 1977 August 18, 1977 September 20, 1977 December 9, 1976 March 10,, 1977 June 9, 1977 September 21, 1977 The next regular meeting of- the Committee will be held in the Association's office commencing at 9:00 A.M., Thursday, October 14, 1976. Adjournment There being no further business, the meeting was adjourned at 6:35 P.M. ^ J Executive Director September 17, 1976 -J PRODUCED