Document zdVYX591jp4xO2y4Vjxz2x56m

Message From: Sent: To: CC: Subject: Kelly, Albert [/0=EXCHANGELABS/OU=EXCHANGE ADMINISTRATIVE GROUP (FYDIBOHF23SPDLT)/CN=RECIPIENTS/CN=08576E43795149E5A3F9669726DD044C-KELLY, ALBE] 9/10/2017 8:40:53 PM Macy, Jim [jim.macy@nebraska.gov] Chu, Ed [/o=ExchangeLabs/ou=Exchange Administrative Group (FYDIBOHF23SPDLT)/cn=Recipients/cn=a7a6452e3e0941b4bblfafalbalae424-Chu, Edward]; Wagner, Kenneth [/o=ExchangeLabs/ou=Exchange Administrative Group (FYDIBOHF23SPDLT)/cn=Recipients/cn=048236ab99bc4d5eal6cl39blb67719c-Wagner, Ken] Re: Superfund ROD decision Dana Site West Highway 6 & 281 site Thanks very much for including me in this communication Jim. Ed and Mary do a very good job so I am sure the result will be positive for all. Sent from my iPad On Sep 7, 2017, at 11:33 AM, Macy, Jim <iim.m3cv@nebraska.gov> wrote: Ed: Please see the attached memo describing NDEQ preferred alternative, G-4, for the West Highway 6 & 281 site in Hastings, Nebraska. Although NDEQ sent a non-concurrence letter, dated August 21, 2017 (attached), I thought it may be helpful to send additional correspondence describing our concerns with EPA's preferred alternative, G-3. Just this morning we learned, via phone conservation, that EPA was going to select NDEQ's preferred alternative, G-4, in the Record of Decision. We still thought there was a benefit in sending this memo. We would like to thank you and your staff for working with NDEQ to accelerate the pace of cleanup and lessen the long-term cost to the State of Nebraska at this site. Jim Macy Director, NDEQ <scan0013.pdf> <Dana Non-Concurance.pdf> Sierra Club v. EPA 18cv3472 NDCA Tier 10 ED 002061 00117496-00001