Document zQ3p13625y3G8K2y2eZeKX8Vg

FOOTNOTES 1. See generally, 41 Am. Jur. 2d Independent Contractors Section 5 (1968). 2. For a thorough discussion of factors considered important in determining whether the coemployment concept will be applied, see King v. Southwestern Greyhound Lines, Inc. 169 F.2d 497 (10th Cir.), cert, denied, 335 U.S. 891 (194d). See generally 41 Am. Jur. 2d Independent Contractors Sections 5-23 (1968). 3. See Nelson v. Shell Oil Co., 396 So.2d 752 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App.), petition denied, 407 So.2d 1104 (Fla. 1981). 4. 29 U.S.C.A. Sections 141 et. seq. (1978 & Am. Supp. 1984). See Lorenz Schneider Co. v. NLRB, 517 F.2d 445 (2nd Cir. 1975) (principal found guilty of an unfair labor practice) . 5. 42 U.S.C.A. Sections 2000e et seq. (1981 & Cum. Supp. 1984). See Sprides v. Reinhardt, 613 F.2d 826 (D.C. Cir. 1979) (requisite employer-employee relationship established so as to permit allegations of sexual harassment and discrimination-under EEO Act). 6. 29 U.S.C.A. Sections 201 et seq. (1978 & Cum. Supp. 1984). See Sims v. Parke Davis & Co., 334 F. Supp. 774 (E.D. Mich.), aff'd, 453 F.2d 1259 (6th Cir. 1971), cert, denied, (where employer-employee relationship not found, payment of wages below federal minimum is permissible). DUP 0910809