Document zDwxm3b0XLkVX5B4Kq68JzV6
FILE NAME Kaiser Gypsum KG
DATE 1999
DOC KG053
DOCUMENT DESCRIPTION Legal - 1st Updated Responses to Standard Interrogatories
GABRIEL A. JACKSON ESQ State Bar No. 98119 PAUL J. GAMBA ESQ State Bar No. 146097
JACKSON & WALLACE LLP
580 California Street 15th Floor San Francisco CA 94104 415 982-6300
Attorneys For Defendant
KAISER GYPSUM COMPANY INC
ged
IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA IN AND FOR THE COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO
10
11
IN RE SAN FRANCISCO COUNTY
COMPLEX ASBESTOS LITIGATION
12
13
14
15
No. 828684
KAISER GYPSUM COMPANY
INC.'S FIRST UPDATED RESPONSES TO PLAINTIFFS STANDARD INTERROGATORIES
TO DEFENDANTS
16
17
PROPOUNDING PARTY Plaintiffs
18
RESPONDING PARTY = Defendant KAISER GYPSUM COMPANY INC
19
SET
20 DATE
Standard
July 30 1999
21
COMES NOW defendant KAISER GYPSUM COMPANY INC hereinafter
22
KAISER GYPSUM and provides the following First Updated Responses to Plaintiffs
23
Standard Interrogatories To All Defendants propounded pursuant to San Francisco
24
County Complex Asbestos Litigation General Order No. 129
25
Hf
26
HI
27
//
28
Hf
1 Kaiser Gv^sum'sFirst Undated Responses to Plaintiffs Standard Interrogatories to Defendants
KAISER GYPSUM'S PRELIMINARY STATEMENT
KAISER GYPSUM submits this preliminary statement to memorialize certain
steps taken to implement the standard discovery regime adopted pursuant to the revised
General Orders filed November 15 1996 governing asbestos personal injury and
wrongful death cases filed in San Francisco Superior Court Under the terms of General
Order No. 129 all defendants must respond to the Plaintiffs Standard Interrogatories To
All Defendants without objection even where those interrogatories appear objectionable
under the rules defined by California statutes and appellate precedent The General
Orders do contemplate that plaintiffs counsel must meet and confer with defendants and
10
consider a specific defendant's concerns with the standard interrogatories as applied to
11
that defendant's factual and litigation circumstances In KAISER GYPSUM's case that
12
process proved sufficiently successful that KAISER GYPSUM did not believe it
13
necessary to file a motion seeking judicial relief from the burdensomeness that would
14
arise in KAISER GYPSUM's circumstances from responding to the literal terms of the
15
discovery
16
The meet and confer process was structured pursuant to an April 24 1997 letter
17
circulated by plaintiffs counsel In accordance with that procedure KAISER GYPSUM
18 - held a meet and confer session with certain plaintiffs counsel on May 15 1997 as
19
contemplated by their April 24 1997 letter During that session agreements were
20
reached on interpretations of numerous specific provisions of the subject standard
21
interrogatories which have since been concurred in by plaintiffs counsel that did not
22
attend the May 15 1997 meeting KAISER GYPSUM's pursuit of its
23
burdensomeness objections remains contingent on continued realization of the
24
agreements reached at the May 15. 1997 meeting
25
KAISER GYPSUM also stated other objections to the subject Plaintiffs Standard
26
Interrogatories during the course of the proceedings leading to their adoption Those
27
objections concerned both the concept of using standard interrogatories for discovery
28
unrelated to the resolution of cases or controversies before the Court objections to the
2
Vaicor Vaicor Cuncum's Cuncum's First Undated Undated Dosnonces Dosnonces to Dlaintiffs Dlaintiffs Dlaintiffs Standard Standard Interrogatories Interrogatories to Defendante Defendante
procedures underlying the development and adoption of the standard interrogatories and
objections to specific aspects of the standard interrogatories on grounds other than
burdensomeness all of which objections were either accepted or implicitly rejected
through adoption of the final standard interrogatories KAISER GYPSUM hereby makes
express on the record that by serving its Responses to Plaintiffs Standard Interrogatories
To All Defendants KAISER GYPSUM neither intends to nor does it waive its rights to
press those objections at an appropriate future opportunity both in the context of specific
cases before the Superior Court and on appellate review KAISER GYPSUM objects to Plaintiffs Standard Interrogatories To All
10
Defendants to the extent that they call for information protected by the attorney
11 privilege or product doctrine
12
This Preliminary Statement and the objections contained herein are incorporated
13
into each of the responses set below
14
KAISER GYPSUM'S RESPONSES TO INTERROGATORIES
15
~ KAISER GYPSUM has not manufactured or marketed any products which
16
contained asbestos as a component since 1976. Accordingly KAISER GYPSUM's
17
Responses to Plaintiffs Standard Interrogatories are based almost entirely on its ongoing
18
review of documents presently available to The Company These interrogatory responses
19
reflect KAISER GYPSUM's knowledge at this time and supersede any previous
20
interrogatory answers KAISER GYPSUM reserves the right to further supplement these
21
responses in the event that more complete or accurate information becomes available
22
RESPONSE TO INTERROGATORY NO 1
23
Joseph R. Hobby Vice President 2680 Bishop Drive Suite 225 San Ramon
24
California 94583
25
RESPONSE TO INTERROGATORY NO 2
26
80-3
Assistant Director Labor Relations
Industrial Relations Department
27
87-11
Administrative Manager
28
Industrial Relations Department
TZTZ on, SU eS
3
ee
*.
ee ee er
a, a
)
present
Vice President
RESPONSE TO INTERROGATORY NO 3
KAISER GYPSUM is a corporation
A.
KAISER GYPSUM COMPANY INC
B.
Washington
C.
KAISER GYPSUM was organized in 1952. Specifically on June 19
1952 Permanente Cement Company later known as Kaiser Cement Corporation formed
a wholly subsidiary named KAISER GYPSUM COMPANY a California
Corporation
10
On December 1 1952 KAISER GYPSUM COMPANY was merged into Pacific
11
Coast Cement Company another subsidiary of Permanente Cement Company and the
12
name of the combined company was then changed to KAISER GYPSUM COMPANY
13
INC
14
D.
KAISER GYPSUM's principal place of business is located at 3000 Busch
|
15
Road Pleasanton California 94566
16
E.
KAISER GYPSUM has held a certificate of authority to do business in
17
California from 1952 to the present
18
F.
KAISER GYPSUM is a wholly owned subsidiary of Kaiser Cement
19
Corporation whose principal place of business is located at 3000 Busch Road
20
Pleasanton California 94566
21
G.
3000 Busch Road Pleasanton California 94566
|
22
RESPONSE TO INTERROGATORY NO 4
23
No.
24
RESPONSE TO INTERROGATORY NO 5
25
Not applicable
26
RESPONSE TO INTERROGATORY NO 6
27
Not applicable
28
Mf
RESPONSE TO INTERROGATORY NO 7
Not applicable
RESPONSE TO INTERROGATORY NO 8
Not applicable
RESPONSE TO INTERROGATORY NO 9
Joseph R. Hobby Vice President 2680 Bishop Drive San Ramon California
RESPONSE TO INTERROGATORY NO 10
A.-C. Joseph R. Hobby Vice President 2680 Bishop Drive San Ramon
California
-
10
RESPONSE TO INTERROGATORY NO 11
11
KAISER GYPSUM has no knowledge that it ever employed a company
12
physician or medical director During the early 1970's Mr. A.J. Trommershausen an
13
industrial hygienist who was not an employee of KAISER GYPSUM was retained by
14
KAISER GYPSUM as a consultant to conduct plant inspection and air sampling tests to
15
evaluate and ensure compliance with new U.S. Occupational Safety and Health
16
Administration requirements
17
RESPONSE TO INTERROGATORY NO 12
18
Melissa A. Youngman former Treasurer was deposed on March4 and
19
5 1993 in the following cases Donald Breslin v Abex et al San Francisco County
20
Superior Court Case No. 943928 Coy Cossey v Abex et al San Francisco County
21
Superior Court Case No. 920148 Norma E. Olsen v Abex et al San Francisco County
22
Superior Court Case No. 914594 and Ray Parson v Abex et al San Francisco County
23
Superior Court Case No. 944872. The court reporter was Tooker & Antz 818 Mission
24
Street San Francisco CA 94102. Plaintiff's attorney was Brayton Harley and Curtis
25
Joseph R. Hobby Vice President of KAISER GYPSUM COMPANY INC was
26
deposed in the following cases Leonard R. Pacheco v Owens Corning et al State of
27
Hawaii Case No. 97-2517-06 Atkinson Court Reporters 53rd Street Suite 625
28
San Francisco California 94103 In Re Complex Asbestos Litigation San Francisco
S
Superior Court Case No. 828684 June 4 1998 Tooker & Antz Court Reporters
RESPONSE TO INTERROGATORY NO 13
A.-U. No.
V.
KAISER GYPSUM was a member of the Gypsum Association Further
|
details regarding this are unknown as discovery is ongoing
W.
KAISER GYPSUM is not aware that any one individual served as its
representative to the Gypsum Association
RESPONSE TO INTERROGATORY NO 14
A.
The precise dates of KAISER GYPSUM's membership in the Gypsum
10
Association are unknown It is believed that such membership extended from the 1950's
11
to approximately 1977
12
B.
KAISER GYPSUM believes that it may have occasionally received
13
minutes of meetings and other informational literature from the Gypsum Association
14
.C
KAISER GYPSUM is currently unable to locate information regarding the
15
names of any committee or subcommittee of which it was a member nor the dates of
16
such committee or subcommittee membership
17
RESPONSE TO INTERROGATORY NO 15
18
A.
KAISER GYPSUM has no knowledge that it ever received documents
19
containing results or conclusions of any such studies and tests prior to 1973
.
20
RESPONSE TO INTERROGATORY NO 16
21
A.
KAISER GYPSUM has no knowledge that it ever received copies or
22
portions of any such studies and tests prior to 1973. KAISER GYPSUM has never
23
been insured by Metropolitan Life Insurance Company
24
RESPONSE TO INTERROGATORY NO 17
25
A.
KAISER GYPSUM has no knowledge that it ever received documents
26
containing results or conclusions of the Saranac Laboratory studies or any such studies
27
conducted by any other laboratory prior to 1973
28
III
6 Kaiser Gypsum's First Undated Responses to Plaintiffs Standard Interrogatories to Defendants
RESPONSE TO INTERROGATORY NO 18
A.
KAISER GYPSUM has no knowledge that it ever maintained a library or
other authorized collection of printed material on occupational disease or
asbestos hazards prior to 1973
RESPONSE TO INTERROGATORY NO 19
A.-B. During the early 1970's Mr. A.J. Trommershausen an industrial
hygienist was retained by KAISER GYPSUM as a consultant to conduct plant inspection
and air sampling tests to evaluate and ensure compliance with U.S. Occupational Safety
and Health Administration requirements
10
On December 27 1971 KAISER GYPSUM's Commodity Purchasing Manager
11
R.W. Grigg deceased wrote to each of KAISER GYPSUM's raw asbestos suppliers
12
These inquiries included a request for information concerning precautions recommended
13
for handling raw asbestos in KAISER GYPSUM's manufacturing facilities as well as for
14
contractors using and applying containing products
15
In July 1973 KAISER GYPSUM personnel participated in an ad hoc committee
16
formed by the Gypsum Association to consider the implications of 1972 Occupational
17
Safety and Health Administration regulations with respect to the release of asbestos fibers
18
during sanding and mixing of joint compounds Tests were conducted on behalf of
19
the committee to measure amounts of asbestos and siliceous dusts generated during
.
20
mixing and sanding ofjoint compounds on typical jobs
21
C.
Joseph R. Hobby Vice President 2680 Bishop Drive San Ramon
:
22
California
23
RESPONSE TO INTERROGATORY NO 20
24
No.
25
RESPONSE TO INTERROGATORY NO 21
26
A.-C. During the early 1970's Mr. A.J. Trommershausen an industrial
27
hygienist was retained by KAISER GYPSUM a as consultant to conduct plant inspection
28
and air sampling tests to evaluate and ensure compliance with U.S. Occupational Safety
7 Kaiser Gvpsum's First Updated Responses to Plaintiffs Standard Interrogatories to Defendants
and Health Administration requirements Plant inspection and air sampling tests were
conducted at the following California plants Antioch 8/71 4/72 and 7/72 Santa Ana
9/71 The addresses of these plants were Antioch Plant Wilbur Avenue Antioch
California Santa Ana Plant 1302 Ritchey Street Santa Ana California
D.
KAISER GYPSUM believes that all such documents regarding its
Response to Interrogatory No. 21 CONTAINING have been previously
provided to plaintiffs attorneys
E.
Joseph R. Hobby Vice President 2680 Bishop Drive San Ramon
California
10
RESPONSE TO INTERROGATORY NO 22
11
A.-E. Other than the plant inspections described in its response to Interrogatory
12
No. 21 KAISER GYPSUM has conducted no such tests
13
RESPONSE TO INTERROGATORY NO 23
14
No.
15
RESPONSE TO INTERROGATORY NO 24
16
Beginning in the early 1970's KAISER GYPSUM began providing medical
17
examinations for those employees involved in the manufacture of containing
18 - products
19
A.
The examinations included chest rays and pulmonary function tests
20
B.
The examinations were mandatory for those employees involved in the
21
manufacture of containing products
22
C.
Yes
23
D.
Joseph R. Hobby Vice President 2680 Bishop Drive San Ramon
24
California
25
RESPONSE TO INTERROGATORY NO 25
26
No.
27
RESPONSE TO INTERROGATORY NO 26
28
A.-D. KAISER GYPSUM is insured under a number of general corporate
8 Kaiser Kaiser Gvnsum's First Undated Responses to Plaintiffs Standard Interrogatories to Defendants
liability insurance policies that were issued by primary insurance carriers including
Truck Insurance Exchange Fireman's Fund The Home Insurance Company and National Union Insurance Company which KAISER GYPSUM maintains provide coverage for
personal injury claims Certain policy terms and conditions are subject to disputes
between KAISER GYPSUM and its carriers KAISER GYPSUM also believes that it is
insured under a number of excess liability insurance policies that were issued by a number of different insurance carriers including some that may no longer be capable of responding to their obligations The terms and conditions of these excess policies may be
subject to dispute KAISER GYPSUM has prepared a summary of insurance information
10
in chart form which is attached hereto as Exhibit A.
11
KAISER GYPSUM will supplement this response in the event the circumstances
12
in a particular case may make more detailed information on insurance policies of
13
relevance taking into account the carrier and dispute resolution status pertaining at that
14
time
15
RESPONSE TO INTERROGATORY NO 27
16
No.
17
RESPONSE TO INTERROGATORY NO 28
18
No.
19
RESPONSE TO INTERROGATORY NO 29
:
20
Not applicable
21
RESPONSE TO INTERROGATORY NO 30
22
A.
See response to 30 and 30
223
B.
No.
24
See response to 30 and 30
D. 25
See response to 30 and 30
26
Yes 1952 to 1976
27
See response to 30 and 30
28
G.
Yes 1952 to 1976
Vainor Vainor Vainor Cummoum'a Cummoum'a CummoumC'ummaoum'a Dirat Undated Undated UndatUndateed dUndated D oe eee eee ee ee te OaH eee wd ITY kk
a
H.
No.
RESPONSE TO INTERROGATORY NO 31
I.
Kaiser Gypsum's Business Gypsum Plaster Gypsum Lath and Gypsum
Wallboard - No Asbestos Used
KAISER GYPSUM was organized by Henry J. Kaiser 1882-1967 the famous
industrialist and World War II hero in 1952 and terminated its United States sales and
manufacturing in 1978. Between 1952 and 1978 KAISER GYPSUM's principal
business consisted of manufacturing and marketing gypsum plaster gypsum lath and
gypsum wallboard These products never contained asbestos The word gypsum is
10
derived from the Greek word gypso meaning chalk Gypsum plaster is sometimes
11
called Plaster of Paris Gypsum occurs in nature in rock form and is found in abundance
12
in Baja California Mexico
13
A.
Wallboard Joint
Compounds - Asbestos Used As A Component
14
When the walls or ceilings of a room are made from gypsum wallboard large
15
pieces of wallboard are installed side by side leaving small spaces where two pieces of
16
wallboard meet These spaces need to be filled so that they cannot be seen after the wall
17
is painted or covered with wallpaper The products used to perform that task are called
18
joint compounds or joint finishing compounds At the time of use these joints
19
compounds are thick putty or mud substances which permits them to be pushed into
20
the spaces and smoothed with a putty knife or spatula Paper or cloth reinforcing tape is
21
pushed into the joint compound to help prevent cracking as the joint compound dries
22
The joint compound dries to form a hard rock substance
23
KAISER GYPSUM manufactured and marketed such wallboard joint compounds
24
and prior to the 1970's these joint compounds contained a small percentage of
25
chrysotile asbestos as a component The purpose of the chrysotile asbestos component
26
was to prevent cracks from forming as the joint compound dried Asbestos is the Greek
27
word for incombustible which refers to things that will not burn Chrysotile is the
28
most common form of asbestos used in products in the United States Chrysotile is a
wer oUF
eos
10
ea elm ella
Or,
Pa
fibrous rock material derived from the rock serpentine which is very common in
California where it is the state rock
These KAISER GYPSUM products were
1.
Joint Cement Compound
2.
Finishing Topping Compound
3
Purpose Wallboard Compound
4
Day Joint Compound
5
mix Joint Compound
6
mix Finishing Compound
10
7
mix Dual Purpose Joint Compound
11
8
mix Topping Compound
12
9
Laminating Compound
13
KAISER GYPSUM's separate responses to interrogatory subparts a for each
14
of these products are as follows
15
1
Joint Cement Compound
16
a
The trade name of this product originally was Kaiser Joint Cement
17
in about 1957 it was changed to Kaiser Joint Compound
18
b
KAISER GYPSUM marketedKaiser Joint Cement in 1952 but did
19
not itself manufacture all of the product sold KAISER GYPSUM does not know
20
whether the manufactured product marketed
in
in
1952
contained asbestos
as
a
21
component KAISER GYPSUM began manufacturing Kaiser Joint Cement in 1952 or
22
1953 at which time chrysotile asbestos was used as a component
23
C.
KAISER GYPSUM last manufactured Kaiser Joint Compound
24
with chrysotile asbestos as a component in 1975
25
d
The KAISER GYPSUM California plants that made this product
26
were located at Redwood City and Antioch These plants were in operation at different
27
times The product was manufactured at Redwood City from 1952 or 1953 to 1957 and
88
at Antioch from 1957 to 1975. Because of the heavy weight of the product low profit
11
Kaiser Kaiser Gunsum's First Undated Responses to Plaintiffs Standard Interrogatories to Defendants
margin and high transportation costs distribution tended to center around the location of
the manufacturing plant The product consisted primarily of minerals including casein or
polyvinyl clay talc limestone and mica The product manufactured in KAISER
GYPSUM's California plants included between % by weight and % by weight
chrysotile asbestos as a component depending on the formula in effect at a given date
e
This product was a white to white powder It was packaged
and sold in sacks of 10 lbs to 25 lbs and in boxes of 5 and 18 lbs Each container was
labeled with the name of the manufacturer KAISER GYPSUM COMPANY INC the
name of the product and directions for its use
10
f
This product was a dry powder which when mixed with water
11
formed a thick paste Upon application it dried to a hard durable surface It was used to
12
fill gypsum wallboard joints embed joint reinforcing tape finish joints and to cover and
13
finish nail heads and metal cornerbead
14
2
Finishing Topping Compound
15
a
The trade name of this product was Kaiser Gypsum Finishing
16
Topping Compound
17
b
KAISER GYPSUM began manufacturing Finishing Topping
18
Compound in 1955 and chrysotile asbestos was used as a component at that time
19
C.
KAISER GYPSUM last manufactured Finishing Topping
20
Compound with chrysotile asbestos as a component inin 1975
21
d
The KAISER GYPSUM California plants that made this product
22
were located at Redwood City and Antioch These plants were in operation at different
23
times The product was manufactured at Redwood City from 1955 to 1957 and at
24| Antioch from 1957 to 1975. Because of the heavy weight of the product low profit
25
margin and high transportation costs distribution tended to center around the location of
26
the manufacturing plant This product consisted primarily of minerals including casein or
27
polyvinyl clay talc limestone and mica The product included between 5.3 by weight
28
and % by weight chrysotile asbestos as a component depending on the formula in
12
Kaiser Kaiser Gunsum's First Undated Responses to Plaintiffs Standard Interrogatories to Defendants
effect at a given time
e
This product was a white to white powder It was packaged
and sold in sacks of 25 lbs Each container was labeled with the name of the
manufacturer KAISER GYPSUM COMPANY INC the name of the product and
|
instructions for its use
f
This product was a dry powder which when mixed with water
formed a thick paste Upon application it dried to a hard durable surface It was used to
top and finish gypsum wallboard joints
3
Purpose Wallboard Compound
10
a
The trade name of this product was Kaiser Gypsum Purpose
11
Wallboard Compound
12
b
KAISER GYPSUM began manufacturing Purpose Wallboard
13
Compound in 1968 and chrysotile asbestos was used as a component at that time
14
C.
KAISER GYPSUM last manufactured Purpose Wallboard
15
Compound with chrysotile asbestos as a component in 1975
16
d
The KAISER GYPSUM California plant that made this product
17
was located at Antioch Because of the heavy weight of this product low profit margin
18
and high transportation costs distribution tended to center around the location of the
19
manufacturing plant This product consisted primarily of minerals including casein or
20
polyvinyl clay talc limestone and mica The product included between 5.1 by weight
21
and 14.2 by weight chrysotile asbestos as a component depending on the formula in
:
22
use at the time
23
e
The product was a white to white powder It was packaged and
24
sold in sacks of 25 lbs Each sack was labeled with the name of the manufacturer
25
KAISER GYPSUM COMPANY INC the name of the product and directions for its
26
use
27
f
This product was a dry powder which when mixed with water
28
formed a thick paste Upon application it dried to a hard durable surface It was used to
ee ee
13
Dlaintiff Dlaintiff Standard Standard Interrogatorias Interrogatorias to Defendants
|
tape top and finish gypsum wallboard joints nailheads and metal cornerbead
4
One Joint Compound
a
The trade name of this product was Kaiser Gypsum Day Joint
Compound Powder
b
KAISER GYPSUM last manufactured One Day Joint Compound
Powder in 1968 and chrysotile asbestos was used as a component at that time
C.
KAISER GYPSUM last manufactured One Day Joint Compound
Powder with chrysotile asbestos as a component in 1975
d
The KAISER GYPSUM California plants that made this product
10
were located at Santa Ana and Antioch Because of the heavy weight of the product low
11
profit margin and high transportation costs distribution tended to center around the
12
location of the manufacturing plant The product consisted primarily of casein limestone
13
and mica The product included 3.4 by weight chrysotile asbestos as a component
14
e
This product was a white to white powder It was packaged
15
and sold in sacks of 25 lbs Each sack was labeled with the name of the manufacturer
16
KAISER GYPSUM COMPANY INC the name of the product and directions for its
17
use
18
f
This product was a dry powder which when mixed with water
19
formed a thick paste Upon application it dried to a hard durable surface It was used to
20
fill gypsum wallboard joints embed joint reinforcing tape finish joints and to cover and
21
finish nailhead and metal cornerbead
22
5
Mix Joint Compound
23
a
The trade name of this product was Kaiser Gypsum Mix Joint
24
Compound
25
b
KAISER GYPSUM began manufacturing Mix Joint
26
Compound in 1959 and chrysotile asbestos was used as a component at that time
27
C.
KAISER GYPSUM last manufactured Mix Joint Compound
28
with chrysotile asbestos as a component in 1962
oe
as
ole
i.
14
glen
4q
aa
a, a,
d
The KAISER GYPSUM California plant that made this product
was located at Long Beach Because of the heavy weight of the product low profit
margin and high transportation cost distribution tended to center around the location of
the manufacturing plant This product consisted primarily of minerals including casein or
polyvinyl clay talc limestone and mica The product included chrysotile asbestos as a
component The percentage presently is unknown Investigation is continuing
e
This product was a white to white colored paste It was
packaged and sold in cans of 4 or 5 gallons and in cartons of 5 gallons Each container
was labeled with the name of the manufacturer KAISER GYPSUM COMPANY INC
10
the name of the product and directions for its use
11
f
This product was a thick paste material which upon
12
application dried to a hard durable surface It was used to fill gypsum wallboard joints
13
embed joint reinforcing tape finish joints and to cover and finish nailheads and
14
cornerbead
15
6
Mix Finishing Compound
16
a
The trade name of this product was Kaiser Gypsum Mix
17
Finishing Compound
18
b
KAISER GYPSUM began manufacturing Mix Finishing
19
Compound in 1959 and chrysotile asbestos was used as a component at that time
20
C.
KAISER GYPSUM last manufactured Mix Finishing
21
Compound with chrysotile asbestos as a component in 1962
22
d
The KAISER GYPSUM California plant that made this product
23
was located at Long Beach Because of the heavy weight of this product low profit
24
margin and high transportation cost distribution tended to center around the location of
25
the manufacturing plant This product consisted primarily of minerals including casein or
26
polyvinyl clay talc limestone and mica The product included chrysotile asbestos as a
27
component The percentage presently is unknown Investigation is continuing
28
e
This product was a white to white colored paste It was
ro am
emi
-~7r
<;, tT
15
lk ct gy oN. FY Toc amoratorion amoratorioamoran torion to Defendante
packaged and sold in cans of 4 or 5 gallons and in cartons of 5 gallons Each container was labeled with the name of the manufacturer KAISER GYPSUM COMPANY INC
the name of the product and directions for its use
g
This product was a thick paste material which upon
application dried to a hard durable surface It was used to finish gypsum wallboard
joints and to cover and finish nailheads and cornerbead
7
Mix Dual Purpose Joint Compound
a
The trade name of this product was Kaiser Gypsum Mix Dual
Purpose Joint Compound
10
b
KAISER GYPSUM began manufacturing Mix Dual Purpose
11
Joint Compound in 1960 and chrysotile asbestos was used as a component at that time
12
C.
KAISER GYPSUM stopped manufacturing Mix Dual Purpose
13
Joint Compound with chrysotile asbestos as a component in 1975
14
d
The KAISER GYPSUM California plants that made this product
15
were located at Long Beach Antioch and Santa Ana Because of the heavy weight of the
16
product low profit margin and high transportation costs distribution tended to center
17
around the location of the manufacturing plant This product consisted primarily of
18
minerals including polyvinyl clay talc limestone and mica The product included
19
between 1.5 by weight and % by weight chrysotile asbestos as a component
.
20
depending on the formula in effect at a given date
21
e
This product was a white to white or light colored paste
22
It was packaged and sold in gallon cans or plastic pails and 4 or gallon cartons
23
Beginning in 1966 small amounts were sold in quart plastic buckets as an
24
accommodation product for lumber dealers under the name Purpose Premix
25
Compound Each container was labeled with the name of the manufacturer KAISER
26
GYPSUM COMPANY INC the name of the product and directions for its use
27
f
This product was a thick paste material which upon
28
application dried to a hard durable surface It was used to finish gypsum wallboard
a
ee TRAIL
16
Dlaintiffs Dlaintiffs Standard Interrogatories to Defendants
joints embed joint reinforcing tape finish joints and to cover and finish nailheads and
metal cornerbead
8
Mix Topping Compound
a
The trade name of this product was Kaiser Gypsum Mix
|
Topping Compound
b
KAISER GYPSUM began manufacturing Mix Topping
Compound in 1968 and chrysotile asbestos was used as a component at that time
C.
KAISER GYPSUM last manufactured Mix Topping
Compound with chrysotile asbestos as a component in 1976
10
d
The KAISER GYPSUM California plants that made this product
11
were located at Santa Ana and Antioch Because of the heavy weight of the product low
12
profit margin and high transportation costs distribution tended to center around the
13
location of the manufacturing plant This product consisted primarily of minerals
14
including casein or polyvinyl clay talc limestone and mica The product included
15
between 0.9 by weight and % by weight chrysotile asbestos as a component
16
depending on the formula in effect at a given date
17
e
This product was a white to white or light colored paste
18
It was packaged and sold in metal and plastic buckets of 4 or gallons and in cartons of 4
19
gallons Each container was labeled with the name of the manufacturer KAISER
20
GYPSUM COMPANY INC the name of the product and directions for its use
21
f
This product was a thick paste material which upon
22
application dried to a hard durable surface It was used to top and finish gypsum
23
wallboard joints
24
9
Laminating Compound
25
a
The trade name of this product was Kaiser Gypsum Laminating
26
Compound
27
b
KAISER GYPSUM began manufacturing Laminating Compound
28
in 1961 at which time chrysotile asbestos was used as a component
SF A
EY cam, PE, TIL TIL TIL
17
D1
,
re
ae
ga
C.
KAISER GYPSUM last manufactured Kaiser Gypsum Laminating
Compound with chrysotile asbestos as a component in 1972 at which time the product
was discontinued
d
The KAISER GYPSUM California plants that made this product
were located at Antioch and Santa Ana These plants were in operation at different times
The product was manufactured at Antioch from 1961 through 1970 and at Santa Ana in
1971 and 1972. Because of the heavy weight of the product low profit margin and high
transportation costs distribution tended to center around the location of the
manufacturing plant The product consisted primarily of soya flour and limestone The
10
product included between 6.5 by weight and 10 by weight chrysotile asbestos as a
11
component depending upon the formula in effect at a given date
12
e
This product was a white to white powder It was packaged
13
and sold in sacks of 25 lbs Each container was labeled with the name of the
14
manufacturer KAISER GYPSUM COMPANY INC the name of the product and
15
directions for its use
16
f
This product was a dry powder which when mixed with water
17
formed a thick paste It was used as an adhesive to laminate one piece of gypsum
18
wallboard to another which was occasionally done to create gypsum drywall partitions
19
having thicker wallboard than could be created by single sheet
20
KAISER GYPSUM's responses to interrogatory subparts g.-j. applicable to all of
21
the eight wallboard joint compound products discussed above are as follows
22
g
KAISER GYPSUM is unsure as to the intended meaning of The
23
U.S. Government's Qualified Products List but has no knowledge that any of its
24
wallboard joint compound products ever appeared on sucha list
25
h
KAISER GYPSUM is aware of the following suppliers of
26
chrysotile asbestos
27
Harrison & Crosfield
Carmonia Chemical Co.
28
Western Chemical Co.
_
Philip Carey Corp. Carey Canadian Asbestos
Manville
Union Carbide Corp. E.S. Browning
Current addresses if any are not known to KAISER GYPSUM Most of the
specific time periods during which these firms supplied asbestos are unknown 13 KAISER GYPSUM sold such products to customers consisting
largely of building contractors or building materials dealers
KAISER GYPSUM has some retained sales orders and sales invoices for some
years which identify the purchasers of KAISER GYPSUM products the dates of sale the
10
amount of each product sold and in some cases the sites to which the products were to
11
be delivered Sales orders and invoices are not organized by type of product and often
12
individual documents cover sales of multiple products KAISER GYPSUM has
13
previously made available to plaintiff's attorneys its retained sales records covering sales
14
to customers in the Geographic Area
15
j
KAISER GYPSUM has previously made available to plaintiff's
16
attorneys responsive documents sufficient to substantiate the above information
17
KAISER GYPSUM regards and maintains its product formulas as confidential business
18
information Incidental to the sale of production facilities in which containing -
19
products were previously manufactured KAISER GYPSUM transferred its trade secrets
20
intangible property rights and other confidential and proprietary business information
21
and assumed obligations to maintain their confidentiality
22
B.
Decorative Texture Finishes For Interior Walls Or Ceilings - Asbestos
Used As A Component
23
24
Drywall partitions or walls made from gypsum wallboard are sometimes
25
decorated with wall covering or wallpaper that is fixed to the wall by an adhesive or glue
26
On other occasions such walls are finished by painting them There are many varieties
27
of paint including some that are intended to create a textured surface rather than a
28
smooth surface KAISER GYPSUM manufactured and marketed several texture paint
19
products that during certain years used chrysotile asbestos as one of numerous
components Drywall ceilings are sometimes finished with decorative products as are
the cement slab ceilings found in some high buildings KAISER GYPSUM also
manufactured and marketed decorative texture products for use on such interior ceilings
that during certain years used chrysotile asbestos as one of numerous components The
KAISER GYPSUM decorative wall and ceiling texture products were
.
Cover Texture Paint
2
Spray or Spray Cover Texture Paint
3
Kaiser Texture Paint
10
4
Cover TSS Wall Texture
11
5
Spray Ceiling Texture
12
KAISER GYPSUM's responses to interrogatory subparts f for each of these
13
products are as follows
14
1
Cover Texture Paint
15
a
The trade name of this product was Cover Texture Paint
16
b
KAISER GYPSUM marketed Cover Texture Paint in 1952
17
but it did not itself manufacture all of the product sold KAISER GYPSUM does not
18
know whether the manufactured product marketed in 1952 contained asbestos
19
KAISER GYPSUM began manufacturing this product in 1953 at which time chrysotile
:
20
asbestos was used as a component
21
C.
KAISER GYPSUM last manufactured Cover Texture Paint
22
with chrysotile asbestos as a component in 1967 when the product was discontinued
23
d
The KAISER GYPSUM California plants that made this product
24
were located in Redwood City and Antioch These plants were in operation at different
25
times The product was manufactured at Redwood City from 1953 through 1957 and at
26
the Antioch plant from 1957 through 1967. Because of the heavy weight of the product
27
low profit margin and high transportation costs distribution tended to center around the
28
location of the manufacturing plant The product consisted primarily of casein
xx
un
eee
...
20
ek ot lg ,
?.
a,
i
limestone and mica The product included between 4.4 by weight and 8.6 by weight
chrysotile asbestos as a component depending upon the formula in effect at a given date
e
This product was a white to white powder It was packaged
and sold in sacks of 25 lbs and of 50 lbs Each container was labeled with the name of
the manufacturer KAISER GYPSUM COMPANY, INC the name of the product and
directions for its use
f
This product was a dry powder which when mixed with water
formed a texture paint It was used to produce texture effects over gypsum wallboard
surfaces
10
2
Spray Or Spray Cover Texture Paint
11
a
The initial trade name of this product was Spray It was later
12
changed to Spray Cover Texture Paint
13
b
KAISER GYPSUM last manufactured Spray Cover Texture
14
Paint with chrysotile asbestos as a component in 1967 when the product was
15
discontinued
16
d
The KAISER GYPSUM California plants that made this product
17
were located in Redwood City and Antioch These plants were in operation at different
18
times The product was manufactured at Redwood City from 1956 through 1957 and at
19
the Antioch plant from 1957 through 1967. Because of the heavy weight of the product
20
low profit margin and high transportation costs distribution tended to center around the
21
location of the manufacturing plant The product consisted primarily of casein
22
limestone and mica The product included 6.6 between by weight and 36.6 by
23
weight chrysotile asbestos as a component depending upon the formula in effect at a
24
given date
25
e
This product was a white to white powder However some
26
colored versions of the product were offered It was packaged and sold in sacks of 25 lbs
27
and of 50 lbs Each container was labeled with the name of the manufacturer KAISER
28
GYPSUM COMPANY INC the name of the product and directions for its use
Vainor Cumcum'a Cumcum'a Cumcum'aDivatUndated Undate Undated Undated Dranonaco
21
Dlaintiffa Dlaintiffa Dlaintiffa Standaw
Standaw Intomonotorion Intomonotorion Intomonotorion Intomonotorion Intomonotorion to Dofondanta Dofondanta
f
This product was a dry powder which when mixed with water
formed a texture paint that was used to produce texture effects over gypsum wallboard
surfaces
3
Kaiser Texture Paint
a
The trade name of this product was Kaiser Texture Paint
b
KAISER GYPSUM marketed Kaiser Texture Paint in 1952
but it did not itself manufacture all of the product sold KAISER GYPSUM does not
know whether the manufactured product marketed in 1952 contained asbestos
KAISER GYPSUM began manufacturing this product in 1952 or 1953 at which time
10
chrysotile asbestos was used as a component
11
C.
KAISER GYPSUM last manufactured Kaiser texture paint
12
with chrysotile asbestos as a component in 1967 when the product was discontinued
13
d
The KAISER GYPSUM California plants that made this product
14
were located in Redwood City and Antioch These plants were in operation at different
15
times The product was manufactured at Redwood City from 1952 or 1953 through 1957
16
and at the Antioch plant from 1957 through 1967. Because of the heavy weight of the
17
product low profit margin and high transportation costs distribution tended to center
18
around the location of the manufacturing plant The product consisted primarily of
19
casein limestone and mica The product included between 4.0 by weight and 8.0 by
20
weight chrysotile asbestos as a component depending upon the formula in effect at a
21
given date
22
e
This product was a white to white powder however some
23
colored paints were sold It was packaged and sold in sacks of 10 lbs and of 25 lbs
24
Each container was labeled with the name of the manufacturer KAISER GYPSUM
25
COMPANY INC the name of the product and directions for its use
26
f
This product was a dry powder which when mixed with water
27
formed a texture paint It was used to produce texture effects over gypsum wallboard
28
surfaces
wr Of)
22
*
rm
5, rTr tig. tm.) 2. 2 ge.
Yk Om Oe . A. LA Wekbn kn a nw
a dafondanta dafondanta dafondanta
4
Cover TSS Wall Texture
a
The trade name of this product was Kaiser Gypsum Cover
TSS Wall Texture Paint
b
KAISER GYPSUM began manufacturing Cover Wall Texture
in 1968 at which time chrysotile asbestos was used as a component
C.
KAISER GYPSUM last manufactured Cover Wall Texture
with chrysotile asbestos as a component in 1975
d
The KAISER GYPSUM California plants that manufactured this
10|
11 12
product were Santa Ana and Antioch The product was manufactured at Santa Ana from 1968 through 1975 and at the Antioch plant from 1968 through 1975. Because of the heavy weight of the product low profit margin and high transportation costs distribution tended to center around the location of the manufacturing plant The product consisted
13
primarily of casein limestone and mica The product included between 4.2 by weight
14
and 8.7 by weight chrysotile asbestos as a component depending upon the formula in
15
effect at a given date
16
e
The product was a white to white powder It was packaged and
17
sold in 50 lb. sacks Each container was labeled with the name of the manufacturer
18
KAISER GYPSUM COMPANY INC the name of the product and directions for its
~
19
use
20
f
This was a dry powder which when mixed with water formed a
21
paint product designed for hand or spray application When dry it produced a hard
22
durable surface It was used to produce texture effects over gypsum wallboard surfaces
23
5
Spray Ceiling Texture
24
a
The trade name of this product was Kaiser Gypsum Spray
25
Ceiling Texture
26
b
KAISER GYPSUM began manufacturing Spray Ceiling Texture
27
in 1961 at which time chrysotile asbestos was used as a component
28
C.
KAISER GYPSUM last manufactured Spray Ceiling Texture
e
23
COR, Sogn?
ae
Nes
with chrysotile asbestos as a component in 1975
d
The KAISER GYPSUM California plants that manufactured this
product were Santa Ana and Antioch The product was manufactured at Santa Ana from
1973 through 1975 and at the Antioch plant from 1961 through 1971. Because of the
heavy weight of the product low profit margin and high transportation costs distribution
tended to center around the location of the manufacturing plant The product consisted
primarily of casein limestone and mica The product included between 1.3 by weight
and 9.9 by weight chrysotile asbestos as a component depending upon the formula in
effect at a given date
10
e
The product was a white powder with either a mineral or
11
polystyrene aggregate It was packaged and sold in 32 lb. sacks Each container was
12
labeled with the name of the manufacturer KAISER GYPSUM COMPANY INC the
13
name of the product and directions for its use
14
f
This was a dry powder which when mixed with water formed a
15
paint product designed for spray application When dry it produced a hard durable
16
surface It was used to produce texture effects over gypsum wallboard or interior
17
concrete ceilings
18
KAISER GYPSUM's responses to interrogatory subparts g.-j. applicable to all of
19
the five decorative texture products discussed above are as follows
20
g
KAISER GYPSUM is unsure as to the intended meaning of The
21
U.S. Government's Qualified Products List but has no knowledge that any of its
|
22
decorative texture products ever appeared on sucha list
23
h
KAISER GYPSUM is aware of the following suppliers of
24
chrysotile asbestos
25
Harrison & Crosfield
Carmonia Chemical Co.
26
Western Chemical Co.
Philip Carey Corp. Carey Canadian Asbestos
27
Manville
Union Carbide Corp.
28
E.S. Browning
24
Current addresses if any are not known to KAISER GYPSUM Most of the
specific time periods during which these firms supplied asbestos are unknown 13 KAISER GYPSUM sold such products to customers consisting
largely of building contractors or building materials dealers
KAISER GYPSUM has some retained sales orders and sales invoices for some
years which identify the purchasers of KAISER GYPSUM products the dates of the
sales the amount of each product sold and in some cases the sites to which the products
were to be delivered Sales orders and invoices are not organized by type of product and
often individual documents cover sales of multiple products KAISER GYPSUM has
10
previously made available for inspection its retained sales records covering sales to
11
customers in the Geographic Area
12
j
KAISER GYPSUM has made available for inspection to plaintiffs
13
attorneys responsive documents sufficient to substantiate the above information
14
KAISER GYPSUM regards and maintains its product formulas as confidential business
15
information Incidental to the sale of production facilities in which containing
16
products were previously manufactured KAISER GYPSUM transferred its trade secrets
17
intangible property rights and other confidential and proprietary business information
18
and assumed obligations to maintain their confidentiality
19
C.
Electric Radiant Heath System Finishing Products - Asbestos Used As
*
:
A Component
20
21
In areas where electricity was expected to be particularly inexpensive some
22
houses and apartments were constructed with electric radiant heating systems In some
23
such radiant heating systems grooves were cut in gypsum wallboard ceilings and
24
electrical heating cables secured in the grooves The groove were then filled and
25
the ceiling covered with a decorative finish In other systems electric heating wires were
26
stapled to the surface of wallboard Then the ceiling was covered with a thick decorative
27
finish that would conceal the heating wires KAISER GYPSUM made several products
28
for finishing such systems and these products used chrysotile asbestos as one of
oe
4
a
.
xmsehhlewehlUllllalt
25
a
ee
++ 4 Pi 2 kbg tk bk Defondants Defondants Defondants
>
ose
numerous components These KAISER GYPSUM products were
1.
Filler Compound
... Radiant Heat Compound
3
Radiant Heath Scrimless Surfacing Compound
KAISER GYPSUM's responses to interrogatory subparts f for each of these
products are as follows
1
Filler Compound
a
The trade name of this product was Kaiser Gypsum Filler
Compound
10
b
KAISER GYPSUM began manufacturing Filler Compound in
11
1961 at which time chrysotile asbestos was used as a component
12
C.
KAISER GYPSUM last manufactured Filler Compound with
13
chrysotile asbestos as a component in 1972 when the product was discontinued
14
d
The KAISER GYPSUM California plant that made this product
15
was located at Antioch It manufactured Filler Compound from 1961 to 1970. Because
16
of the heavy weight of the product the low profit margin and high transportation costs
17
distribution tended to center around the location of the manufacturing plant The product
18
consisted primarily of minerals including limestone and mica The product used
19
chrysotile asbestos as a component in its formula but the amount of asbestos called for in
20
the formula used to manufacture the product at the Antioch plant is uncertain
21
Investigation is continuing
|
22
e
This product was a white to white powder It was packaged
23
and sold in sacks of 50 lbs Each container was labeled which contained the name of the
24
manufacturer KAISER GYPSUM COMPANY INC the name of the product and
25
directions for its use
26
f
This product was a dry powder which when mixed with water
27
formed a thick paste Upon application it dried to a hard durable surface It was used to
28
cover Radiant Heating System ceiling surfaces
ey
os
.oom 2 :) oe we
gee
26
rr
ee ee ee
rr
dafandenta dafndenta dafandenta dafandenta dafandenta
2
Radiant Heat Compound
a
The trade name of this product was Kaiser Gypsum Radiant Heat
Compound
b
KAISER GYPSUM began manufacturing this product in 1968 at
which time chrysotile asbestos was used as a component
C.
KAISER GYPSUM last manufactured Radiant Heat Compound
with chrysotile asbestos as a component in 1974 when the product was discontinued
d
The KAISER GYPSUM California plant that made this product
was located in Santa Ana where it was manufactured from 1968 through 1974. Because
10
of the heavy weight of the product the low profit margin and high transportation costs
~
11
distribution tended to center around the location of the manufacturing plant The product
12
consisted primarily of sand and white portland cement The product included between
13
3.3 by weight and 3.6 by weight chrysotile asbestos as a component
14
e
This product was a white to white powder It was packaged
15
and sold in sacks of 60 lbs Each container was labeled with the name of the
16
manufacturer KAISER GYPSUM COMPANY INC the name of the product and
17
directions for its use
18
f
This product was a dry powder which when mixed with water
19
formed a thick paste that was used to cover radiant heating cables stapled to ceiling
20
surfaces
21
3
Radiant Heat Scrimless Surfacing Compound
22
a
The trade name of this product was Kaiser Gypsum Radiant Heat
23
Scrimless Surfacing Compound
24
b
KAISER GYPSUM began manufacturing this product in
25
California in 1972 at which time chrysotile asbestos was used as a component
26
C.
KAISER GYPSUM last manufactured Radiant Heat Scrimless
27
Surfacing Compound with chrysotile asbestos as a component in 1974 when the product
28
was discontinued
poe
~~
sor
Ur
lm
a
27
TD
a tes Oe
1
Interocatorias Interocatorias Interocatorias to Defendants Defendants
aa
Saga
Shae
d
The KAISER GYPSUM California plant that made this product
was located in Santa Ana where it was manufactured from 1972. Because of the heavy weight of the product the low profit margin and high transportation costs distribution tended to center around the location of the manufacturing plant The product consisted
primarily of sand silica flour and mica The product included % by weight chrysotile
asbestos as a component
e
This product was a greenish powder It was packaged and sold in
sacks of 25 lbs and in sacks of 50 lbs Each container was labeled with the name of the
manufacturer KAISER GYPSUM COMPANY INC the name of the product and
10
directions for its use
11
f
This product was a dry powder which when mixed with water
12
formed a thick paste that was used to cover radiant heating cables embedded in ceiling
13
surfaces
14
KAISER GYPSUM's responses to interrogatory subparts g.-j. applicable to all of
15
the three radiant heating system surfacing products discussed above are as follows
16
g
KAISER GYPSUM is unsure as to the intended meaning of The
17
U.S. Government's Qualified Products List but has no knowledge that any of its radiant
18
heating system surfacing products ever appeared on sucha list
19
h
KAISER GYPSUM is aware of the following suppliers of
.
20
asbestos
21
Harrison & Crosfield
Carmonia Chemical Co.
22
Western Chemical Co.
Asbestos
Philip Carey Corp. Carey Canadian Asbestos
23
Manville
Union Carbide Corp.
24
E.S. Browning
25
Current addresses if any are not known to KAISER GYPSUM Most of the
26
specific time periods during which these firms supplied asbestos are unknown
27
13 KAISER GYPSUM sold such products to customers consisting
28
largely of building contractors or building materials dealers
wr oe
es
om6h
Orr
lt
ltt
28
ot tNGg a 4 dD Tok acetorian
acetorian acetorian to Dofondante
KAISER GYPSUM has some retained sales orders and sales invoices for some
years which identify the purchasers of KAISER GYPSUM products the dates of the
sales the amount of each product sold and in some cases the sites to which the products
were to be delivered Sales orders and invoices are not organized by type of product and
often individual documents cover sales of multiple products KAISER GYPSUM has
previously made available to plaintiff's attorneys its retained sales records covering sales
to customers in the Geographic Area
j
KAISER GYPSUM has previously made available to plaintiff's
attorneys responsive documents sufficient to substantiate the above information
10 - KAISER GYPSUM regards and maintains its product formulas as confidential business
11
information Incidental to the sale of production facilities in which containing
12
products were previously manufactured KAISER GYPSUM transferred its trade secrets
13
intangible property rights and other confidential and proprietary business information
14
and assumed obligations to maintain their confidentiality
15
D.
Gypsum Wallboard Accessories For Exterior Use - Asbestos Used As
A Component
16
17
KAISER GYPSUM experimented with gypsum wallboard products for use on the
18
exterior surfaces of buildings but those products proved unsuccessful KAISER
19
GYPSUM never discovered a way for them to be manufactured that would allow them to
20
effectively withstand the wide variety of weather and temperature conditions that exterior
21
products confront Those exterior gypsum products were marketed in several test areas
22
and as in the case of interior gypsum drywall products required the use of materials to
23
fill the spaces between pieces of gypsum wallboard and to provide a decorative finish
24
KAISER GYPSUM offered products for those purposes whose components included
25
small percentages of chrysotile asbestos These products were
26
1
Terior Premix Prefill Compound
27
2
Terior Premix Wall Texture Compound
28
KAISER GYPSUM's responses to interrogatory subparts f for each of these
29
ee
products are as follows
1
Terior Premix Prefill Compound
a
The trade name of this product was Kaiser Gypsum Terior
Premix Prefill Compound
& KAISER GYPSUM began and ceased marketing this product
during 1975. Chrysotile asbestos was used as a component for the brief period during
which this product was manufactured
d
The KAISER GYPSUM California plant that made this product
was located at Antioch The product was marketed in a limited market area where
10
exterior gypsum wallboard was being sold on a test basis Kaiser Gypsum Terior
11
Premix Prefill Compound was made primarily of raw gypsum PVA emulsion and mica
12
The product included 1.5 by weight chrysotile asbestos as a component
13
e
This product was a white to white paste It was packaged and
14
sold in metal cans and plastic buckets of 60 lbs and in cartons of 48 lbs and 60 lbs
15
Each container was labeled with the name of the manufacturer KAISER GYPSUM
16
COMPANY INC the name of the product and directions for its use
17
f
This product was a paste that was used to pre joints in gypsum
18
wallboard installed on building exteriors
19
2
Terior Premix Wall Texture Compound
&,
20
a
The trade name of this product was Kaiser Gypsum Terior
21
Premix Wall Texture Compound
22
& KAISER GYPSUM began and ceased marketing this product
225
during 1975. Chrysotile asbestos was used as a component for the brief period during
24
which this product was manufactured
25
d
The KAISER GYPSUM California plant that made this product
26
was located at Antioch The product consisted primarily of limestone acrylic emulsion
22
and mica The product included 1.5 by weight chrysotile asbestos as a component
28
e
The product was a white to white paste It was packaged and
30
Voison Mo td ELLmdatad ELLmdatad ELLmdatad
Desnonse Desnonse be Desnonse Dlai Dlaintn iff tDi lainf tiff f Standard Standard Interrogatories Interrogatories Interogatories Interrogatories to Defendante
sold in 58 lb. metal cans plastic buckets and cartons Each container was labeled with
the name of the manufacturer KAISER GYPSUM COMPANY INC the name of the
product and directions for its use
f
This product was a white to white paste that was used to
provide surface texture to gypsum wallboard on building exteriors
KAISER GYPSUM's responses to interrogatory subparts g.-j. applicable to the
two exterior finishing products discussed above are as follows
g
KAISER GYPSUM is unsure as to the intended meaning of The
U.S. Government's Qualified Products List but has no knowledge that any of its
10
exterior finishing products ever appeared on sucha list
11
h
KAISER GYPSUM is aware of the following suppliers of
12
chrysotile asbestos
13
Harrison & Crosfield
Carmonia Chemical Co.
14
Western Chemical Co.
Philip Carey Corp. Carey Canadian Asbestos
15
Manville
Union Carbide Corp.
16
E.S. Browning
17
Current addresses if any are not known to KAISER GYPSUM Most of the
18
specific time periods during which these firms supplied asbestos are unknown
.
19
( 1-3 KAISER GYPSUM sold such products to customers consisting
20
largely of building contractors or building materials dealers
21
KAISER GYPSUM has some retained sales orders and sales invoices for some
22 years which identify the purchasers of KAISER GYPSUM products the dates of the
23
sales the amount of each product sold and in some cases the sites to which the products
24
were to be delivered Sales orders and invoices are not organized by type of product and
25
often individual documents cover sales of multiple products KAISER GYPSUM has
26
previously made available to plaintiff's attorneys its retained sales records covering sales
27
to customers in the Geographic Area
28
j
KAISER GYPSUM has previously made available to plaintiff's
31
attorneys responsive documents sufficient to substantiate the above information KAISER GYPSUM regards and maintains its product formulas as confidential business information Incidental to the sale of production facilities in which containing products were previously manufactured KAISER GYPSUM transferred its trade secrets
intangible property rights and other confidential and proprietary business information
and assumed obligations to maintain their confidentiality Consistent with those property rights and obligations KAISER GYPSUM is prepared to produce the formulas for containing products marketed in the Geographic Area under a confidentiality
agreement
10
II
Products Made At Kaiser Gypsum's Oregon Plant
11
From 1956 to 1978 KAISER GYPSUM owned and operated a plant located at St.
12
Helens Oregon whose basic capability was to make building construction products by
13
compressing wood fibers extracted from wood chips to make various types of sheets and
14
boards used in constructing buildings
15
The overwhelming majority of the products KAISER GYPSUM made at its
16
Oregon plant were sold with the trademark Firtex No product sold under this trade
17
name ever used asbestos as a component
18
Firtex products also included materials intended for use on ceilings One type
19
was tiles that could be glued or tacked to ceilings to reduce noise Another group of such
20
products was used in suspended ceilings KAISER GYPSUM found that the
21
manufacturing machinery at its St. Helens Oregon plant could be used to make ceiling
22
tiles and lay boards for suspended ceilings with various types of mineral wool as the
23
principal component instead of wood chips KAISER GYPSUM marketed such Kaiser
24
Gypsum Mineral Fibreboard products for many years KAISER GYPSUM never used
25
asbestos as a component in any of its hour rated products
26
A.
Hour Rated Mineral Fiberboard Underwriters
Laboratories Inc. Design - Asbestos Used As A Component
27
28
Fire code officials came to insist that in some types of buildings ceiling tiles or
32
q
E
Lay
suspended ceiling lay boards must be able to resist fire for at least 2 hours KAISER
GYPSUM attempted to qualify mineral fiberboard products manufactured at its St. Helens Oregon plant under this standard but initial efforts proved unsuccessful This was because under the fire heat of test conditions the square or rectangular mineral
fiberboard products would lose their shape in less than 2 hours creating cracks between
the pieces that would let the fire through causing the products to fail the test Eventually KAISER GYPSUM discovered that if small amounts of asbestos were added the mineral
fiber ceiling tiles and lay boards could be made to hold their shape for 2 hours under the conditions of fire tests conducted by Underwriters Laboratories and those versions of
10
the products received the desired hour fire resistance classification KAISER
11
GYPSUM marketed the hour rated products called Underwriters Laboratories
12
Design for about a decade but the product was not very successful due in part to its high
13
costs
14
KAISER GYPSUM's responses to interrogatory subparts a.-j. for this minor
15
product are as follows
16
a
The trade name of this product a mineral fiber product was Kaiser
17
Mineral Fiberboard - U.L. Rated Underwriters Laboratories Inc. Design The
18
same product was cut into ceiling tiles and lay boards for use in suspended ceilings It
19
was used for acoustical ceiling tile and suspended lay board in circumstances where a
20
hour fire resistance classification was specified Both the ceiling tiles and the lay
21
boards were sold under the trade name Kaiser Mineral Fiberboard Rated
22
Underwriters Laboratories Inc. Design
23
b
KAISER GYPSUM began manufacturing Mineral Fiberboard
24
Rated with chrysotile asbestos as a component in 1963
25
C.
KAISER GYPSUM last manufactured Mineral Fiberboard
26
Rated with chrysotile asbestos as a component in 1974 when the hour rated
27
product was discontinued
28
d
The plant that made this product was located at St. Helens Oregon
33
This product included 1.6 by weight chrysotile asbestos as a component
e
This product consisted of ceiling tiles and lay boards with face
side white or colored and with a perforated or fissured design for acoustical treatment
The tiles were 5/8 by 12 by 12. The lay boards came in various sizes the most
common being 1/2 or 5/8 by 24 by 24 and 1/2 or 5/8 by 24 by 48. They were
packaged and sold in boxes of various quantities The boxes contained the name of the
manufacturer KAISER GYPSUM Company Inc. the name of the product and other
printed material KAISER GYPSUM's hour rated ceiling tiles and suspended
ceiling lay board products in which chrysotile asbestos was used as a component
10
were required to be specially marked because they looked similar to other KAISER
11
GYPSUM mineral fiberboard ceiling tiles and lay boards that did not contain asbestos
12
as a component and building inspectors wanted to be able to check to make sure that
13
products with a hour fire resistance classification actually were being used by the
14
building contractor when those had been specified It is believed that hour rated
15
ceiling tile and suspended ceiling lay board were stamped on the back with either the
16
initial KG or the word K^ ISERGYPSUM It is believed that this marking was
17
employed during the entire period that the hour rated products were manufactured
18
by KAISER GYPSUM
19
f
This product was used for acoustical ceiling tile and suspended
20
lay board in circumstances where a hour fire resistance classification was specified
21
g
KAISER GYPSUM is unsure as to the intended meaning of The
22
U.S. Government's Qualified Products List but has no knowledge that any of its hour
23
rated mineral fiberboard products ever appeared on sucha list
24
h
KAISER GYPSUM is aware of the following suppliers of
25
chrysotile asbestos to its St. Helens Plant
26
Loomis Chemical Co.
Benson Chemical Co.
27
28
Current addresses if any are not known to KAISER GYPSUM Most of the
34
specific time periods during which these firms supplied asbestos are unknown
1-3 KAISER GYPSUM sold such products to customers consisting
largely of building contractors or building materials dealers
KAISER GYPSUM has some retained sales orders and sales invoices for some
years which identify the purchasers of KAISER GYPSUM products the dates of the sales the amount of each product sold and in some cases the sites to which the products
were to be delivered Sales orders and invoices are not organized by type of product and
often individual documents cover sales of multiple products KAISER GYPSUM has
previously made available to plaintiff's attorneys its retained sales records covering sales
-
10
to customers in the Geographic Area
11
j
KAISER GYPSUM has previously made available to plaintiff's
12
attorneys responsive documents sufficient to substantiate the above information
13
KAISER GYPSUM regards and maintains its product formulas as confidential business
14
information Incidental to the sale of production facilities in which containing
15
products were previously manufactured KAISER GYPSUM transferred its trade secrets
16
intangible property rights and other confidential and proprietary business information
17
and assumed obligations to maintain their confidentiality
18
III
Types of Products Kaiser Gypsum Never Made And Never Marketed
19
KAISER GYPSUM has never mined milled or marketed asbestos KAISER
20
GYPSUM never designed manufactured or marketed any product in which amosite
21
crocidolite or other amphibole forms of asbestos were used as a component KAISER
22
GYPSUM never designed manufactured or marketed floor tile pipe insulation or pipe
23
covering refractory products boiler insulation acoustical plaster sprayed fireproofing
24
or sprayed thermal insulation products KAISER GYPSUM never designed
25
manufactured or marketed any sort of brake products It never designed manufactured
25
or marketed paper products textile products or roofing products in which asbestos was
27
used as a component KAISER GYPSUM never designed manufactured or marketed
28
any products intended for use in ships or shipyards or any products intended for use in
35
trains or other railroad equipment or railroad facilities
IV Null Type Gypsum Wallboard - Allegedly Contaminated
Vermiculite Ore
This part of KAISER GYPSUM's response though not directly called for by the subject interrogatories is being made in light of earlier versions of KAISER GYPSUM's responses to standard interrogatories and evolving knowledge in the context of historical regulatory uncertainties about whether vermiculite ore used as a component in some Kaiser Gypsum Null Type Gypsum Wallboard products which may have been contaminated in a way that caused certain workers to be exposed to airborne asbestos
10
KAISER GYPSUM's position is that no Kaiser Gypsum Null Type Gypsum
11
Wallboard using vermiculite ore as a component could have been a substantial
12
contributing factor to any disease caused by exposure to airborne asbestos fibers
13
As background in 1954 KAISER GYPSUM introduced Null brand
14
wallboard a 5/8 thick gypsum wallboard that was approved by the Research Committee
15
of the Pacific Coast Building Officials Conference and certified by the National Board of
16
Fire Underwriters for a hour rating Wallboard products that were rated were
17
labeled as Type X to distinguish them from ordinary gypsum wallboard products that
18
had not passed rating tests
19
When introduced in 1954 the primary component of KAISER GYPSUM's Null-
20
Fire wallboard was gypsum stucco which is the gypsum plaster that forms the greatest
21
percentage by weight of all gypsum wallboard KAISER GYPSUM found that by
22
adding small proportions of glass fiber and perlite a board could be constructed that
23
would resist shrinking and cracking under the heat of the fire test for the required one-
24
hour period Perlite is a very light substance white in color that looks like puffed
25
breakfast cereal It is often used in soil for potted plants to help keep the soil from
26
caking
27
KAISER GYPSUM continued to market its Null Type X Gypsum
28
Wallboard products that contained perlite for more than a decade following their
36
introduction in 1954
Until 1965 KAISER GYPSUM could not use vermiculite to provide fire
protection in gypsum wallboard because other companies had secured patents from the United States government which gave them exclusive rights to use vermiculite in their
gypsum wallboard products In 1965 KAISER GYPSUM began using vermiculite in its
wallboard products to provide increased protection against fire Vermiculite is a mica-
like mineral found in the ground in a number of places Such expanded vermiculite is
used by nurseries everywhere to help hold air and moisture in plant soil so that young
plants will grow faster and stronger
10
Once rated and approved KAISER GYPSUM began marketing vermiculite-
11
containing gypsum wallboard under its Null brand KAISER GYPSUM
12
manufactured limited quantities of Null Type X Wallboard beginning in 1967
13
and began manufacturing 5/8 Null Type X Wallboard in 1969. It continued to
14
market such products until it disposed of the last of its gypsum business in April 1978
15
Like other wallboard products those Null wallboards consisted primarily of
16
gypsum plaster The formulas varied over the years but the vermiculite ore percentage
17
did not exceed % by weight of the products
18
Controversy concerning vermiculite reflects the regulatory proposals published
19
and regulations adopted by the U.S. Occupational Safety and Health Administration
20
OSHA OSHA is a U.S. government agency created by federal legislation in 1970
21
that adopts and enforces workplace safety and health regulations OSHA has been
22
controversial from the beginning California's parallel state program was terminated
23
several years ago
24
The federal OSHA undertook to regulate exposure to asbestos in the workplace
25
as one of its first regulatory undertakings and OSHA adopted regulations on asbestos in
26
1972. In due course OSHA began to threaten manufacturers who used various
27
substances other than asbestos with charges of violating the OSHA asbestos exposure
28
regulations This triggered a lasting legal and scientific dispute concerning what
37 Kaiser Kaiser Gunsum'Gus nsum's First Undated Responses to Plaintiffs Plaintiffs Standard Interrogatories to Defendants
minerals are asbestos for purposes of the OSHA regulations and what minerals should
be regulated like asbestos even if they are not asbestos
In that context vermiculite supplier W.R. Grace & Co. hereinafter Grace
issued an Important Notice to Vermiculite Ore Processors dated March 17 1976
warning that employers of workers handling vermiculite ore should be aware of the
OSHA regulations because OSHA was applying them to Grace vermiculite plants and
proposed to make the regulation of dust more strict under the regulations Grace stated
that the issues related to vermiculite reflected a tramp mineral found in vermiculite
deposits named tremolite defined by OSHA as one of the asbestos family Disputes
10
over these OSHA proposals persisted for years Then on June 20 1986 OSHA
11
published in the Federal Register at 51 Fed Reg 22612 a final rule that defined
12
asbestos to include tremolite and applied asbestos exposure limits and warnings to
13
tremolite However shortly thereafter those regulations were stayed that is not made
14
effective by OSHA as to tremolite and several other minerals to prevent the federal
15
courts from deciding whether the regulations were arbitrary and capricious See 51
16
Fed Reg 37002 Oct. 17 1986. The scientific and regulatory debate continued for years
17
until OSHA published regulations in 1992 57 Fed Reg 24310 June 8,1992 declaring
18 - that some tremolite is platy or fibrous and that platy tremolite would not be
19
deemed to be asbestos
20
However OSHA found other tremolite was fibrous or asbestiform and that such
21
asbestiform tremolite would be regulated as asbestos OSHA further limited these
22
regulations by providing that even products with asbestiform tremolite would not be
23
subject to asbestos regulation if asbestiform tremolite is present in a product in
24
concentrations less than 1.0 percent by weight
25
KAISER GYPSUM admits that for a limited number of years some of its Null-
26
Fire products contained vermiculite but KAISER GYPSUM denies that these products
27
contained asbestiform tremolite KAISER GYPSUM further contends that any attempt
28
under state law to deem any products that have less than the amount that would subject
38
Vainos Vainos Vainos Cumsum'a Cumsum'a CumsumC'umsaum'a Firat LindLinda ated tLinde ated dLindated Desmonses to Desmonses Dlaintiffs DlaintDlaintifs iDlafinftifsfs Standard Standard Interrogatories to Defendants
:
&
them to federal regulation to be containing products would be preempted by federal law and the Supremacy Clause of the U.S. Constitution
RESPONSE TO INTERROGATORY NO 32
Not applicable
RESPONSE TO INTERROGATORY NO 33
Not applicable
RESPONSE TO INTERROGATORY NO 34
Not applicable
RESPONSE TO INTERROGATORY NO 35
10
_ KAISER GYPSUM is unaware of entering into any such rebranding agreements
11
RESPONSE TO INTERROGATORY NO 36
12
During 1952 KAISER GYPSUM purchased JointJoint Cement Cover Texture
13
Paint and Kaiser Texture Paint from Wesco Waterpaints Inc. then located in
14
Berkeley California that was packaged under KAISER GYPSUM's name It is unknown
15
to KAISER GYPSUM whether asbestos was used as a component of those products
16
During December 1953 KAISER GYPSUM entered into an agreement with Wesco
17
Waterpaints Inc. then located in Berkeley California to purchase Joint Cement
18
Topping Compound and Texture Paint packaged under KAISER GYPSUM's name for a
19
period of 90 days It is unknown to KAISER GYPSUM whether any products purchased
20
had asbestos as a component KAISER GYPSUM has no information demonstrating that
21
any product obtained from Wesco Waterpaints Inc. was an containing product
22
KAISER GYPSUM knows of no other agreement entered by it that provided for
23
rebranding any product of another company's which may have been an asbestos-
24
containing product in KAISER GYPSUM's name for sale in California
25
RESPONSE TO INTERROGATORY NO 37
26
Yes as to products marketed in 1972 or thereafter
27
A.
Beginning in 1972 in response to regulations adopted by the U.S.
28
Occupational Safety and Health Administration see 37 Fed Reg 11318 June 7 1972
39
KAISER GYPSUM affixed caution labels to the packages and containers of its asbestoscontaining products The OSHA regulations requiring this label were made subject to the limitation that no label is required where asbestos fibers have been modified by a
bonding agent coating binder or other material so that during any reasonably
foreseeable use handling storage disposal processing or transportation no airborne concentrations of asbestos in excess of the exposure limits prescribed in paragraph B. of
this section will be released In light of existing ambiguities as to what tests OSHA would recognize as adequate to demonstrate a product's falling within this exception KAISER GYPSUM applied the caution label to all its manufactured products in
10
which chrysotile asbestos was used as a component
11
Initially the labels were four inches by eight inches in size and had yellow
12
backgrounds with red letters They were affixed to the bag or container of the product by
13
adhesive in a prominent place Later as new bags and containers were purchased the
14
labels were printed onto the side of the bag or container and are believed to have been the
15
same color or colors as the container or the printing thereon The warning label as
16
prescribed by OSHA read
17
CAUTION contains asbestos fibers avoid creating dust
breathing asbestos dust may cause serious bodily harm
18
19
Additionally KAISER GYPSUM Technical Bulletins 5703 dated October
20
1973 and 5707 dated October 1973 and November 1976 prescribed the use of
21
respirators during spray application
22
B.
Yes
23
C.
Beginning in 1972 exact date unknown
24
D.
This caution label remained unchanged during the remaining time the
25
products upon which it was used continued to contain asbestos as a component
26
E.
Joseph R. Hobby Vice President 2680 Bishop Drive San Ramon
27
California
28
Ill
40
LON etseacse
RESPONSE TO INTERROGATORY NO 38
Most of KAISER GYPSUM's products were sold in the form of a powder or
paste therefore the name of the company was on the packaging of the product
However KAISER GYPSUM's hour rated ceiling tiles and suspended ceiling lay-
in board products in which asbestos was used as a component were specially marked
because they looked similar to other KAISER GYPSUM Mineral Fiberboard ceiling tiles
and lay boards that did not contain asbestos as a component and building inspectors
wanted to be able to check to make sure the hour rated products actually were
being used by the building contractor when those had been specified It is believed that
10.
11
each piece of hour rated ceiling tile and suspended ceiling lay board was stamped on the back with either the initial KG or the word KAISER GYPSUM Such
12
marking was employed during the entire period that the hour rated products were
13
manufactured by KAISER GYPSUM
14
RESPONSE TO INTERROGATORY
39
15
- KAISER GYPSUM has no knowledge that it ever purchased or otherwise
16
acquired an containing product line from another person or entity
17
RESPONSE TO INTERROGATORY NO 40
18
KAISER GYPSUM has no knowledge that it ever sold an containing
19
product line to another person or entity
i,
20
RESPONSE TO INTERROGATORY NO 41
21
A.-C. KAISER GYPSUM has retained a number of brochures pamphlets
22
catalogs and other product information documents Many of these documents discuss
23
both containing products and other products and many of the documents are
24
similar KAISER GYPSUM has previously made representative documents available to
25
plaintiff's attorneys
26
D.
To provide potential users of such products with information about the
27
products
28
E.
Some of these documents still exist
wr.
_
es
rm
io,9%7
@
5:
@&
41
ee ee
ee
a, ee
10 11 12 13 14
_
15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28
F.
G.
California
See response to A. - C.
Joseph R. Hobby Vice President 2680 Bishop Drive San Ramon
RESPONSE TO INTERROGATORY NO 42
The interrogatories define contract unit to mean a branch or division of a
defendant which has been or is now engaged in installation and removal of raw asbestos fibers and containing products KAISER GYPSUM never had
such a unit
RESPONSE TO INTERROGATORY NO 43
- Not applicable
RESPONSE TO INTERROGATORY NO 44
In the mid to late 1960's KAISER GYPSUM became generally aware from media industry and governmental publications of allegations that inhalation of asbestos fibers could have potential health consequences
RESPONSE TO INTERROGATORY NO 45
See Response to Interrogatory No. 44
RESPONSE TO INTERROGATORY NO 46
KAISER GYPSUM has previously made documents containing the information requested available to plaintiff's attorneys
RESPONSE TO INTERROGATORY NO 47
Beginning in the mid 1960's KAISER GYPSUM warned its employees
concerning the hazards of inhaling asbestos dust or fiber and its employees were given
additional instructions regarding the use of respirators and other methods of avoiding or
limiting inhalation of asbestos
A.
Memoranda distributed to safety supervisors advised the use of approved
respirators during exposure to asbestos dust
B.
Yes
C.
Joseph R. Hobby Vice President 2680 Bishop Drive San Ramon
42
California
D.
See response to subpart A.
RESPONSE TO INTERROGATORY NO 48
KAISER GYPSUM has no knowledge that it ever issued such a policy
RESPONSE TO INTERROGATORY NO 49
Yes See Responses to Interrogatory Nos 37 and 47
RESPONSE TO INTERROGATORY NO 50
Yes
A.
29 CFR 1910.93
10
B.
November 2 1973
11
C.
OSHA
12
D.
Unknown
13
E.
KAISER GYPSUM believes the conditions alleged to be violations were .
14
changed in a manner satisfactory to OSHA
15
RESPONSE TO INTERROGATORY NO 51
16
Not applicable
17
RESPONSE TO INTERROGATORY NO 52
18
Not applicable
19
RESPONSE TO INTERROGATORY NO 53
20
Yes
21
A.
KAISER GYPSUM shipped containing products through ports
22
located in the Geographic Area
23
///
24
|||
25
Hf
26
Ill
27
|||
28
/Hf
a
B.-D. KAISER GYPSUM sales orders and sales invoices show that asbestos-
containing products were shipped through the following berths located in the Geographic
Area during the years 1968 through 1975 Matson Contract Yard Matson Lines Dock Matson Lines Berth 208 Matson Peters Delta Terminal Richmond Berth
154 Terminal 1 Berth 3 Encinal Terminal San Francisco 9th Avenue Pier Oakland
and Berth 0 7th Street Oakland
Dated August 3,19 9 3,1999 3,1999
JACKSON & WALLACE LLP
10
11
By
tO Ache
\
PAUL J. GAMBA
12
Attorneys for Defendant
KAISER GYPSUM COMPANY INC
13
14
KAISER.400 RESPONSE GO129UPD.KG GO129UPD.KG
15
16
11
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
96
27
28
10
11
12
VERIFICATION TO FOLLOW
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
88
In Re San Francisco County Complex Asbestos Litigation
S.F.S.C. 828684
PROOF OF SERVICE BY OVERNIGHT MAIL
Code Civ Proc 1013 2015.5
STATE OF CALIFORNIA COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO
I Cynthia Elrod declare as follows I am over 18 years of age and not a party to the within action my business address is 580 California Street 15th Floor San Francisco California 94104 I am employed in San Francisco County California
On August 3 1999 I served a true copy with all exhibits of the following document KAISER GYPSUM COMPANY INC.'S FIRST UPDATED
RESPONSES TO PLAINTIFFS STANDARD INTERROGATORIES TO
DEFENDANTS on the interested parties in the referenced case by following
ordinary business practices and placing for collection and overnight mailing at
580 California Street San Francisco The above document would have been deposited
10
with Federal Express for overnight delivery the same day they were placed for
deposit with postage fully prepaid
11
The foregoing envelope were addressed as follows
12
Berry & Berry
13
1300 Clay Street 9th Fl
Station D P.O.Box 70250
14
Oakland CA 94612-0250
Bruce L. Ahnfeldt Esq 1001 2nd St. 345
P.O. Box 6078
Napa CA 94581
15
Brayton Purcell Curtis et al
Law Offices of Jack K. Clapper
65
222 Rush Landing Road
2330 Marinship Way Suite 140
P.O. Box 2109
Sausalito CA 94965
65
Novato CA 94948
18
Law Offices of Christopher E. Grell
Law Offices of Dean A. Hanley
685 Market Street Suite 540
5430 Cerro Sur Street
19
San Francisco CA 94105
El Sobrante CA 94803-3873
20
Harrison & DeGarmo
Visse & Yanez
One Daniel Burnham Ct 220
One Daniel Burnham Ct 220
21
San Francisco CA 94109
San Francisco CA 94109
22
Wartnick Chaber et al
101 California Street Suite 2200
23
San Francisco CA 94111
24
I declare under penalty of perjury under the laws of the State of California that the
foregoing is true and correct and that this declaration was executed on August 3 1999
25
26
27
28
GO129UPD.GK O129UG PD.KG
thes Elod Elrod
Cynthia