Document yvxzOKJ4BqOO5pxwB5qGk5Xd

7 | J -i M. H. U R N ER , M. M. F. MCCARTHY, M. D. v. w . f is c h b a c h ! m . d , R . E. H O W ARD. Mi El. MURPHY MEMORIAL HOSPITAL ' 26t h Fl o o r UNION C E N T R A L B U ILD IN G , FO U R T H a n d V IN E S T R E E T S P H O N E MAIN 0 3 1 6 H O U RS; TO A. M. t o 2 P , M. Cin c in n a t i, o h io March 6, 1936. Dr . Rob er t Keh oe, Lied l e a l Sc h o o l , Un iversity of Cin cin n ati, Eden A v e . , C i t y . Dear Dr . ICehoe : Dr . Howard ask e d mo t o exam in e' _____ e y e s , wh i c h I d i d on Fe b . 24t h The p at ien t ~ h as a v i s i o n o f: 20/ 50- r igh t eye 2 0 / 2 0 0 l e f t tT Under Homatr opin e: Righ t eye +0.50 c y l . a x i s 7 gave 20/50. Le ft " +0.75 " " 97 " 2 0 / 3 0 . Th er e i s a m acu l ar r e t i n i t i s in each e y e . The p e r iph ery of each eye i s normal, but ce n t r al v isio n is very poor. I t i s c e r t a i n l y a q u e st i o n i n my mind i f t h i s man is ever goin g to have b e t t e r v isio n th an he h as at p r ese n t . I do n ot t h in k h i s eyes w i l l ever be normal a gain . I t i s t oo soon t o be c e r t a i n w h et h er t h e damage t o h i s v i si o n i s permanent , or whether .t h er e w i l l be p a r t i a l improvement. ` Thanking you fo r sen din g him, U/H X