Document ypxebeoJ3294B8371V3zRy7wV

^y. ;| ' -A ?- ; 1 1.1 - ov.^A , *" ^ \ i \ 11 o* i \ PLAINTIFF'S EXHIBIT I**. ' j u j-H-us _\er.etn Ai'-ays provide od-ress to which reply is to be sent -vD- ( October 6, 1976 .SUBJECT. Please use a separate sheet for each subject treated In recent discussions with II\A they expressed concern as to whether or not the people doing the dust tr.cnitcrir.g tests every six months in the RPC. ?RGKO, and 30X3EX plants,vere, in fact, qualified to operate the equipment and run valid tests. I indicated that in all plant locations, the plant manager would be the logical., one to conduct or monitor the tests and v?e have agreed to provide I1<A with a letter from an- outside independent testing source certifying that specific people by name were trained by them (the outside laboratory) to conduct these dust monitoring tests . Accordingly, we will want to proceed within each of the above reference companies to set this procedure in motion. . . . . J ulius BON - 00955