Document yp5pY7M04ya7YGZBMb1N0Q86r

CAA^Ax /'lc xc-y ~&<f~ ~Zc <?// A 7 Ap^yr^tAc^^ 'l <A -t'Cr sf,,'\i ^Vi^vj 22--'^ t--i ^ / j7-t iS^J-J J;' . Q r - -TM-"/ JJ ,\rt> Q^-x i_-</2/y^< ~-s ~ MEMORANDUM TO: Mr. HT. M. Weed FROM: Mr. W. J. Veenis r? December 2, 1968 7^ a-/' / /? //f t. 7 Reference: Budget Proposals - Zinc Institute Lead Industries ILZRO c7 ' Each Industry Development Committee has centered its efforts toward image building in 1969: LIA, through an institutional ad campaign in "Business Week" and other publications (a plus $44,000. item); ZII, via promotion of the Zincatura (approx imately $80,000.). An increase in assessment rate for lead is about 23<f per ton (based on 10/1/67 to 9/30/68 low production ^ period), while the zinc increase Is under 4<f per ton. j With ILZRO, small budget increases were passed on to the Board of Directors by the Program Review Committee -- after reason able cuts and deferments had been made. Graham will have a full report on this after his Board of Directors meeting in November. i 1 WJV/ee 2 ' (a e- it J,> :AD& ' il ' N10058 PNYC00000283 rz jL -- L TAr L/Zr CcJ . AHDfrA <31 &uU*. pNtCOiOOOOZfi^