Document ybQyL6m1krvENykXYD4aXRm7E
ACT
tal ral*
ening
(8%f
19%) 46%) 38%) 19%) 'ration of
OSURE
lit ides (4%)
(8%) 19%) 12%) (8%)
ition of
s BY
More mality 24%) 36%) 60%) 53%) 35%) ificantly
Anderson et alHousehold Asbestosis
395
Table 11 Prevalence of Radiographic Abnormalities by Year of Onset of Exposure*
Year of Onset of Exposure
' 1941-1946 1946-1950 1950-1955
Total Examined
434 113 129
Small Opacities
79(18%) 19(17%) 16(12%)
Pleuralf Thickening
98 (23%) 21 (19%)
9 (7%)
Pleuralf Calcification
46(11%) 5 (4%) 3 (2%)
One or moref Abnormalities
172 (40%) 38 (34%) 29 (22%)
Total
676*
114(17%) 128 (19%)
54 (8%)
239 (35%)
Three individuals with uncertain year of onset excluded. tPrevalence of abnormality greater among those with earlier onset of exposure, (p < .01).
for the pleural abnormalities. Statistical significance was not reached for a similar increase in combined small opacities.
The relationship of the household contact to the worker was also important (Table 12). Wives had the highest prevalence of abnormalities (48%) and daughters had the lowest (21%). Mean duration of exposure was the same for all relationship categories. The prevalence of abnormalities was statistically significantly lower among the daughters when compared to the other exposure groups.
With only a few exceptions, household contact clinic participants were unaware that they had any asbestos-associated disease. The prevalence of other disease processes was unrelated to asbestos exposure (arthritis, diabetes, hypertension, gout, etc.). The household contacts considered themselves to be in good health; the clinical examinations generally confirmed this.
Current symptoms and clinical findings detected among the household contacts examined are summarized in Table 13. Rhonchi were the most common physical findings, not significantly associated with the prevalence of any type of radiographic abnormality. On the other hand, dyspnea, rales, cyanosis and clubbing were signifi cantly more prevalent among those with small opacities and/or pleural abnormalities on their x-rays.
Table 12
Prevalence of Radiographic Abnormalities by Household Contact's Relationship to Index Worker
Relationship
Wives Daughter Sons Siblings Others
Total
Total Examined
162 224 151
81 61
679
Small Opacities
40(25%) 15 (7%) 31 (21%) 15(19%) 12(21%)
129(19%)
Pleural Abnormality
58 (36%) 34(15%) 47 (31%) 22 (27%) 17 (28%)
178 (26%)
Parenchymal and/or Pleural
77 (48%) 46 (21%)* 63 (42%) 30 (37%) 23 (38%)
239 (35%)
Mean Duration of Exposure
2.2 2.4 yrs. 2.4 2.6 yrs. 2.3 2.8 yrs. 2.1 2.1 yrs. 3.6 3.3 yrs.
Prevalence of radiographic abnormalities significantly higher among sons than daughters. X2- 19.6 pc.001.