Document xzqazk86wxEdmk4eqE784ddxG
INTERROGATORY WO. 104: With respect to each subject listed below, state whether said subject was, at any time, discussed at a meeting of the board of directors of Defendant, any predecessor or any related company:
(a) The sale and/or marketing of any asbestos-containing product, including, but not limited to, the products listed in response to Interrogatory Nos. 19 and 42;
(b) The health hazards resulting from exposure to asbestos, including, but not limited to, exposure resulting from the use, application or removal of asbestos-containing products;
(c) The placement or possible placement of warning labels on asbestos-containing products or their packages, or in sales literature, therefore including, but not limited to, the products listed in response to Interrogatory Nos. 19 anti 42; and
(d) Any test, survey, study or similar matter concerning asbestos or asbestoscontaining products, including, but not limited to, the products listed in response to Interrogatory Nos. 19 and 42.
SECOND AMENDED ANSWER TO INTERROGATORY NO. 104:
Abex objects to this interrogatory on the grounds that it is overly broad, unduly
burdensome, compound, vague and ambiguous and calls for speculation.
Abex also objects to this interrogatory to the extent it purports to seek information or
materials regarding time periods and products that are not at issue in these cases, on the grounds
that such information or materials lack relevance and are not reasonably calculated to lead to the
discovery of admissible evidence. To the extent it purports to seek information or materials
regarding the working conditions of Abex employees, this interrogatory is further objected to on
the grounds that such information or materials lack relevance to the issues arising in these cases
and are not reasonably calculated to lead to the discovery of admissible evidence. Abex objects
to this interrogatoiy on the grounds that the information or materials it purports to seek lack
relevance to the issues arising in these cases and are not reasonably calculated to lead to the
186