Document xz49x5oeOwnO7rV6pObqQaVe0

_i iT. j , j V. L. VEAV5R, K.S. textile piers department SPRSANCE ?UNT RICHMOND, VIRGINIA August 15, 1966 . P,l:C-OC'12{7 Z havs ordsred an extrs eopy of "The Biological Effects of Asbestos" which eontams the papers presented at the New Vsrk Acadeny of Sciences meeting. Vhlle Z u vtitmg for delivery of this booklst, Z as sending you a election of papers from our files. The American Petroleum Institute correspondence is Interest.ng because the exposure of their workers would be somewhat similar to your own. Z have been wondering whether a regional aeeting of plant physicians from Textile fibers plants to diseusa pulmonary disease would be of value. If there were sufficient interest, perhaps we could arrange for some outside authorities la various fields of pulmonary disease to ealk to the group. This Is purely my own suggestion, and 2 would be Interested in your reaction. eftieiNAi 8I0NC8 rr O.A SToees 0. J. Stopps, M.B.,B.S. Chief, Physiology Section OJS/dyb Enclosures (8) 037 DUP 0900529 I\l Pile DON'T iiA> ll'nnii Denise Enclosures with GJS'S letter to W. L. Weaver, M.D. a.,. 8/15/66 1. Allan E. Dooley's letter of February 10, 1966, to Members of Central Committee on Medicine and Health. 2. "Asbestos Study, Progress Report to the API Committee on Industrial Hygiene" by Asbestos Committee - A. E. Dooley, R. Diajun, L. Levin, April 22, 1966. 3. Letter published In The Asbestos Worker Journal, February 1966, page 18. \ 4. "Asbestosls and Pulmonary Carcinoma" by Frank R. Dutra and John D. Carney - Arch. Environ. Health 10: 416-423, March 1965. 5. ''Relation Setween Exposure to Asbestos and Mesothelioma'' by Irving J. Selikoff, Jacob Churg and E. Cuyler Hansiond The New England Journal of Medicine 272 (ll) : 560-565, March 18, 19c; TEAK IT UP BEFORE YOU THROW IT AWAY 'JCi8 OOP 0900530