Document xjrg04aY1kNwNNGpQqYjrew2g

fhioago #70-1 - c. C. Bilal Atlanta, ffPSlZDOf / s* - C. J. Atvood / / c Ba*d co aooe ocrrsjpuTiirnoe frm both ifr.'Z>ler>aa and yourself re^rdlng this prcsdact (vith particular reference to * BBetlBC Kr I>ierea propose*) I hcra =plet*ly rcriavad our position* ' x;; ` . . . 1. Profit ? our 19^9 sale* of *33.3^0. profit wets *6,161 (19I) Profit treniad downward during th* ywr. frost 25^ for the first four aoath* la 1969* for th* first four Month* of 1970 an Mir* of *30.179 m lort te>Vn (-&). e h*T* no control over cast to prlc* no aaunot crpi-aia this pocor result. __ 2. Chmlltr It is sy nndarxttacadiac that there la a aertoo* Bprxydcat --------- oonplaint la m n rnpreaeatlag a of $lV,0CQ which jea ar* hsaaiia-*, Brttlaoesxt of *tt or part of thia would plaoa yarn fvrtt** <^ the loss colraa. 3. Health garard '' -_ VMla whether or not thia product la a health debatable *r*t jy not be troi, there la a nega.,^..- attltule for thia rcaaca co th* port of secae trad* factors. Also, I would assuoa that 030 would barre css* legal liability. . 1. PLgtributton There 1* sou* ccoccrn that the Dpxuydan craluslre applicator policy could Jeopardlx* our relationship with othar pod cu* toners. Bu*od aa the abore fact* I foci that the tl tng 1* poor for any type of a presso t tonal Deetiag cm thl* product. Ecriwrar, I would b* very happy to discus* thia wittar further with either yumself or hr. Diersen at any tine suiting your oanrunlcac*. .