Document xjN3ynjG1wbRVmDr0XR4gRZx6

DownloadRandom document
- 29 - ' , . REPORT OP THE C02UTTEE ON THRESHOLD LIMITS .. -r * ' * DR f* PAIREJMX,- (U. S. Publio Health Service) i It 1* obviously difficult, where a large number of substances is involved# to review the allowable * concentration values in detail at an annual meeting. Fbr that reason, provision ,\wae made early in the organisation of the American Conferenoe-of Governmental In- /^dustrial Hygienists for a Committee on Threshold Limits to study this question and to report to the'Conference at its annual meeting. The composition of this Com mittee is not fixed but is changed by annual appointment and the threshold limit ^'values are similarly maintained in a fluid stato by annual revision. For a number 'of years the Coamittee has subjected these values to oereful scrutiny and attespted to bring them into close conformance with practice. - .. of Vns 11 ';7 V A?*.4 , During the present year, it was folt that the ooncept of maximum allowable values had now reached a stage where more, extensive participation of the members of the Conference in the formulation of these values based upon personal experience in the field would be of deoided assistance. This year# therefore, your Committee hes for the first time, I believe, made a direct attempt to obtain a statement from each member of the Conference with reference to tho annuel threshold limit values end the resoonse from the lndividir.1 nembers has been most generous and helpful. *.f V - `i ' ,* *.,..** / In view of the* annual revision of threshold limit velues,it has been the pur pose of the Conference to seek values which, on the one hand protect the individ ual workman, and on the other would imposo no impossible burden on the manufac turer, This balance Is difficult to achieve but can be attained by just such a series of adjustments as is provided for in the Constitution of the Conference, fi There is no industrial poison so potent, so virulent, that it cannot be manufactured safely under carefully controlled conditions. The manufacture end widc- ' spread use of such a substance as lead tetraethyl and tho preparation of extremely poisonous war gases are good illustrations of this. In fact, the chemical manu facturing Industry in general has been able to maintain a high standard of safe * industrial practice by the installation of suitable control measures for the pro tection of its workers. There is no reason why 6uch safe industrial control measures cannot bo extended to industry in gcnernl wherever industrial poisons occur. r `; . .7 In addition to the cbnsnonts of the members of the Conference, a few criti cisms from other sources have reached us, concerning tho 1947 values. These may be briefly summarized as follows: '' * 1. Concerning the membership at large, criticism has taken the form that (a) vnlucs were arrived at by consulting tho membership at large, and (b) thet the members were not consulted. '. . 2. The publication of the values in the Industrial Hygiene newsletter made ./> it appear thet the values were those of the U. S. Public Health Servioo. -whether ' 'this was wishful thinking or not,, the source of tho 1947 values was dearly in- diceted at tho time of publication. ---------- : ... , -- . \ / ' .. . -.T;V 'V f- ' 3.*' Criticism has cIso taken .the form that tho values given wero not arrived -<^J'ot .or based upon scientific evidence. The latter hes particularly interested . ... . .. ... * v-m .! *4 ^ 4 , j, *.*.. . I"SI ' -S ^ ... V . ,,.. y . 200 . ii* * sm .~*.your present Committee. No speoiflo "scientific evidence" has so far been pre- sented for our consideration along with this criticism. 7J*V***" / * - >.' " ' ' While it will doubtless be very advantageous to have what might be called J permanent or standard maxtpum allowable oonomtration values, it must be borne in 1 mind that all our'values at the present time are fluid and subjcot to annual ro- i vision* They should not be adopted as flxcdorlegal values, but merely as guides * to'assist us in defining more or less safe working conditions* It is felt that ' ] eventually definite values oan be .established whioh will give full'and ample pro . teotion to tho worker. ... . . V ; . ' f * 4 # % 'The following changes have been ma.de,in the values from those of the 194? * conference: * - . -- Benzene has been decreased from 9 to $5, ppm . 7/ . .. . er. Chlorine hae been decreased from 2.to 1 ppm ' ' Formaldehyde has been decrecsed from 10 to 5 ppm Hydrogen chloride has been .decreased from 10 to 5. ppm , _ Hydrogen cyrnide hrs been decreased from 20 to 10 ppm Hydrogen selenide-has been decreased from 0.10 to 0.05 ppm Trichloroethylene hes been decreased from 150 to 100 ppm Iodine has .been changed from .1 mg./cu.m, to 1 ppm '; B^Butiinoa# hof-rpeem Increased from-200 t? 250 pga Isbpropylether has been increased.from 400 to 500 ppm- Antimony has been increased from 0.1 mg./cu.m.",to 0.5 . Arsenio has been increased'from 0.1 mg./cu.m to.Q.5 * Sulfuric acid has been increased from 0.5 mg./cu.m. to 1.0 It must be borne in mind that these values are not'indices of toxicity and are not intended to approach that value. Accordingly, the comparative toxicity of these compounds cannot be established on the basis of their numerical maximum allowable concentration value. . . - . '; ,, ` ` onse to drugs end toxic substances. 7With these facts in mind tho Committee has set values below which it is fair to expect reasonable protection and above which it is reasonable to expect that m we can have occasional cases of poisoning. ' #.'' ,' ' . ..5 ' v*' <- ' THRESHOLD LIU IT . VAUJ IS ADOPTED AT APRIL, 1948, MEETING OF AMERICAN '"I--. *' GCNfEHPICE OF GOVEfihMEH?ALc INDUSTRIAL HYGIENISTS IN BOSTON, MASSACHUSETTS %? I'. GASES AND VAPORS .. 1,- % V e&VvH*** ' v-- f r. V > SSUIIRBRSTTANCE . .* Aoetaldchyde : Aoetio acid ~J * .i\Acetio anhydride i 11- -- " P.P.U. -::<1 ;: 200 10 6 -- .--. . * r*. ^, ' _ iwi.WBSrillOE Acrolein ^ Acrylonitrile Ammonia '* .v.3:> .. * " ..i y : ~~ p.pji-.. 0.5 ; Z~'' 20 . V: 100 " 0. i1:.- Acetone . . 500 Amyl acetate . 200 ./ - 31 - :. .-A . GASES AND VAPORS (cont'd.) ' r.SUBSTANCE . P.F.M. . - SUBSTANCE P.P.M. ...Iso-Amyl aloohol ..."Aniline .. *: ^Arsine ' ' /Benzene (bmtol) '/Bromine ;;;i,3-Butadiene ' "'tt-Butanol 2-Butanone . ,. . n-Butyl acetate .. Butyl oellosolve . Carbon dioxide ' Carbon disulfide * Carbon- monoxide 100 5 0.05 35 1 :i,ooo 50 --___250 200 200 5,000 20 r" .* 100 Ethyl formato Ethyl silicate Forma ldehyde Gasolene . Heptane .. ,A Hexane ' Hydrogen chloride Hydrogen cyanide * Hydrogen fluoride Hydrbgen aelenide Hydfogen sulfide . Iodine Xsophorone 100 100 .5 500 : 500 : 500 5 10 - . 03- . OS - " 20 1 25 'Carbon tetrachloride 'IV 50 Mesityl oxide - ' 50 Cellosolve t - 200 Methanol 200 Cellosolve acetate - 100 Methyl acetate 200 Chlorine " / 1 Methyl bromide - 20 2-Chlorobutadiene 25 Mothy1 butanone 100 Chloroform 100 Methyl cellosolve 25.. 1-Chloro-l-nitropropan e Vm*" 20 Methyl oellosolve aootate - ; 25' Cyclohexane 400 Methyl chloride * 100 Cyclohexanol .-< ~ 100 Methylcyolohexane 500 Cyclohexanone . -*'** 100 Methyl cyclohexanol 100 Cyolohexene *' : -400 Methylcyclohexanone . 100 Cyclopropane (propene) 400 Methyl formate 100 o-Dich lorobenx ene 50 * Methyl iso-butyl ketone 100 Dichlor odifluor one thane 1,000 .Monochlorobenzene 75 1.1-Dichloroethane - 100 Monofluorotrichloromethane 1,000 1.2-Dichloroethane (ethylene Mononitrotoluene 5 dichloride) 1.2-Dichloroethylene v Dichloroethyl ether ; ** Dichloromethane ' * Dichloromonofluoromethane ' 1,1-Dichloro-l-nitroethane 75 . Naphtha (coal tar) ' 200 - Naphtha (petroleum) * 15 Nickel carbonyl - ' 600 Nitrobenzoie ' *- *; 1,000 Nitroethone "* ' ' 10 . Nitrogen oxides (other than N2O) 200 500 1 1 100 25 1.2-Dichloropropano ' Nitroglycer in . 0.: (propylme dichloride) * 75 Nitromethane "" .. 100 Dichlorotetrafluoroethane 1,000 2-Nitropropane 50 Dimethyl aniline 5 Octane 500 Dlmethylsulfate . l Ozone 1 Dioxane . 100 Pentcno r 1,000 Ethyl acetate 400 Pen tan one (methyl propenone) 200 iv Ethyl alcohol Ethyl benzene r'thyl bromide Ethyl chloride v' \ 'j:.. Xf-v;; `1,000 r; - 200 ' 200 1,000 Fhosgene .o: is fv.t-.-r.. Phosphine . Phosphorus trichloride . . Iso-Propanol 1 0.06 0.5 400 Ethylene chlorohydrin 6 Ethylene oxide - 100 Ethyl ether per ,..r * r~ . . i ' 400 Propyl acetate Iso-Propyl ether Stiblne : ... - .. ,, 2*>=ep.tiv. 200 500 0.1 r .*4. V- ' - 32 - . ". .' ; - * 9 * I '\ * , /i . - - ^ CASES AND VAPORS (cant'd.) . * SUBSTANCE a . ... P.P.U, . : SUBSTANCE . ** . 3 At ',r Stoddard solvent Styrene monomer Sulfur chloride Sulfur dioxide , 500 Toluene ', ; - - -v ;..uvhr2.?^ -Toluldine ' .Trichloroethylene 4S-:?-C * > Turpentine .. ?> !.*vf W i tt * ll#2#2-Tetr*chloroethane 6 " . Vinyl chloride Tetraehloroethylene . m * loo .V -P.P.P. r .200 -s ''.100 100 :S00 200 -> . * . ; 3 %*' ` - . -S- / l A' *'* 1 - 1 ***.** -'.I*. ` llg. per ' * SUBSTANCE ; .. m cu. m. . ' 1' f s ' * ' Mg. per SUBSTANCE *. . . cu* m. yr Antimony 0.5 . Mercury ; .. Arsenic 0.5 ' Pentachloronaphthalene Barium - 0.5 Pentachlorophenol ; Cadmium . 0.1 Phosphorus (yellow) Chlorodipheny1 l Phosphorus pentachloride Chromic acid and chromates as Cra.0.1 Phosphorus pentasulfide Cyanide as CNN . . .5 Selenium, as Se - Dinitrotolucno 1.5 Sulfuric aoid Fluoride 2.5 Tellurium Iron oxide fume * 15 fetryl Lead ' ; -.* 0.15 Trichloronaphthalene Magnesium oxide fume 15 Trinitrotoluene Manganese ' . 6 Zinc oxide fume .0*1 . . 0.5 . 0.5 0.1 .. 1 i 0.1 1.0 . o.i 1.5 5 1.5 15 ' . t* . * . ** . r. ' * .. SUBSTANCE ' * MINERAL BUSTS * V M.P.P.C. F. '' - ' * SOBSTANCE * -vM.P.P.C.F. Alundun . ' ' -60 Silica: - -Asbestos # . .5. ,> high (above 50# free SiO) Carborundum * ' 50 medium (5 to 50# free SiOjg) Oust (nuisance, no free silica) 50 low (below 5# free Si02) Mica (below 5# free silica) 50 Slato (below 5# free Si02) Portland cenent Talc : : 50 ' ' 20 Soapstone (below 5# free SlOo) Total dust (below 6# free Si^) ' ' * * RADIATIONS *. 5 20 50 50 20 50 MATERIAL OR RaDIAIION Radiant t faergy Radiant MATERIAL OR RADIATION Energy Cessna (roentgen per . . 0.1 Radon (curies per cubic meter) ' ia"8 ft * fhoron (curies per cubic meter) 10" X-ray (roentgen per day) " . > 0.1 *: * . :v r-':. >:' V- *'lCiv.vr : .