Document xEDLnZVz6vZdZ56oJ2eoVBKb
381 pp
AR226-097F
DRAFT INITIAL ASSESSMENT REPORT PERFLUOROOCTANE SULFONIC ACID
AND ITS SALTS
October 2, 2000
ER =- 3a53
XR
Prepared by
3m in consultation with
Consultancy Jack Moore, DVM, DABT, Hollyhouse, Inc.
Joseph Rodricks, PhD, DABT and Duncan Tunbull, DPhil, DABT, The Life Sciences Bill Warren-Hicks, PhD and colleagues, The Cadmus Group, Inc.
[------
Contain NO CBI
000001
TABLE OF CONTENTS
LU
EINXTERCOUDTUICVTEISOUNMcMcARsY ws |
FE
IL 20
GDIESCNUESSRIAONLc INFORMAo TION ON Ev XPOSUREe vcr ore s .
30 GEeNnVerIaRlOINNTMOEFNMATIc ON 0 EXPOSUo LE w ve s n
30 EDVIrODMED(al FE
EXPOSUTE
convener
3.1.2 Predicted Environmental Concentrations PEC)...uwmwonemremmsmon 10
3122 32
BEfOfeRctsc on the ENVIo FONMENtr rr n e ns ns n
1 12.
321 322
EEffffeeccttss oonn ATeqruraetsitcriAanliamnadlsAqfuraotmicExBpirodssuraendtoMAaqmumeoaulssCfornocmenBtiraotaicounmsm.u.l..a.t.i.o.n.o1f2
33
rR Initial
ASSesSMENt
fOr
the
EAVIFONMEN
covers
----'t 14
331 332
Risks to Aquatic Biota from Exposure Potential Risks to Terrestrial Wildlife
to PFOS in Surface Waters ............ from Bioaccumulation of PFOS ......o....
14 14
333 Other Effects.
16
4B 2 HUMAN EXPOSUIE c E or . so 321
42.2 42.3
NOoCDC-U0PCACIUOPNAAi!OENXaPlOESXUPLOESSUc TES cr oo rr som sa io nn3353
424 425
IFnOdPitrNeCctOMEIXNpGosSurTeUViGaIthEe SEN.VIcFOcNMrEiNtmcsusvrmsmrmrmrsssssssssssssssnsssnn 3388
43 43.1
MEfofdecetsofonAcHtiUoMn,ANToxHiEcoAKiRnec tics, MEtao bOISI v.v ...corve senemres nrenrnn 3388
ABIL 4.3.12
TMOOXIECOOKfINAECHHOCNSc ANA MEtADONScr res s s3389
432 43.3
ARecpuetaetTeodxiDcOiStyE STtOuXdIiCeHsY(c PHIVALE)u cm om si mn os s 4456
ABIL 4332
NP-OEASFOc SE corrmmeo mmmemmsssss ssmsmmsssst ssssmeenens eneesssmnn 4562
434 435
GREepErtoidcucTtOiXvIeCHaYndc Developmo ental TONr EY v r o em s 5594
43.6 44
ADantyaoftrhoerm HSEuUmdiaens iRnelHeUvMaAntNSInc OrMAtiono su v .e .s .6611
rr ------
i
000002
44.1 442
MBeadcikcgarloSuUnPdVaEInIdAENaCrElSyUMAeIdEiScar l SUrVeillance .s .......oumsms mmmssmsmmon 6621
443 44d
WMOORTKANIYPSROUGIIEESSSc c o r ns s e 6643
45 45.1
AInDiPtiIaOlAACshse(s0sAmSeSntESfSorEDHc UMANo HEAIthc ro os ni en ne es , 6655
452 453
OHetahletrhEExfpfeerctismeonftPaFlODSataanRdelDaotseed-R0esHpeoanlstehREfeeCltsao tiono shipn s... 6706
454 445
UInnicteiratlaAiSnStEieSsSMiEnNAEssOFesRsImSeKnc t and Wo OrK in n PrOGIv ESS m er r ss e 7710
50 60
RCEOFNECRLEUNSCIEOSNSc AND Ro ECOu MMEr NDAs TIOe NS.s .. 1723
AAPPPPEENNDDIIXXIII--SSuummmmaarryyRfeoproArqtusaftoircPThoyxsiiccoallo/gCyheSmtiucdailesPr(OPPErNtiEesC.S.)......c.o.r.n.1I--11
APPENDIX APPENDIX
III IV
-
Aquatic Exposure Data Planned-Environmental
(Multi-City Studies on
StUY) o.com MIL Perfluorooctane Sulfonates (PFOS)....
APPENDIX V - RODUSt SUIMMAFIES crs V1
Ort ItiAscent pon PFS
W
000003
(bled [
LI OFTS ABLT ES
abeame
Physical and Chemical Properties (See Appendix V for Robust Summaries)
32
Environmental Concentrations (PECs)of PFOS in Blood, Plasma, and
33
Environmental Concentrations (PECs) of PFOS in Liver `Samples from
3-4
Environmental Concentrations (PECs) of PFOS in Other Tissue`Samples
3-5
PFOS mm Comme Toxicity Data for Mammals: Observed Effects, Serum Levels |and
Historical Findings ofSerum Organic Fluorine Levels in the General
mr petrevor Serum Concentrations in Male and Female Rats after 14-weeks of
4-5
Matemal and Fetal PFOS Serum and Liver PFOS Concentrations
6 ComparisonofSerum [PFOS] after Dosing with PFOS for 42 Days Pre-
`mating, During Mating, Gestation and through Lactation(approximately 13 weeks)
PFOS Toxicity Data for Mammals: Key Observed Effects, Serum and
Comparative Effects Among Three Perfluorooctancsulfonyl Fluoride-
mre Te i Fern on | [ [11 0|OOrnall(Gggavvaaggee))PNR-EOASFDOeSvEeDleovpemleonpmeTonxnilcTitoyvSeatyiSestudies]
T Sui empEs a200 4-12
Cross-foster PFOS Study Post-Natal Pup Effects. During 21 Day
a4
a reEros 4-15 rC e o a mpoe mer 4-16
Retrospective Cohort Mortality Analysis for Male Employeesof the
PFOS Toxicity Data for Mammals: Observed Effects, Serum and Liver NOELS from Animal Studietos be Used for Initial Assessment of Human
Tr r--are
.
000004
LIST OF FIGURES
[=r] Hee POSF Fluorochemical Reaction Tree
3
`Cumulative Frequency Distribution of Aquatic Specics Ecotoxicity
Test Results
32
Cumulative Frequency DistributionofMean PFOS Concenirations in
Blood SamplesofPiscivorous Wildlife Species
33
Cumulative Frequency Distributionof Liver SamplesofPiscivorous Wildlife
Mean PFOS Species
Concentrations
in
aT
`Mean Serum PFOS Concentrations for Males and Females During
182 Daysof Oral Dosing a either 0.03, 0.15 or 0.75 mg/kg/day
rat Inetsc Rorm PrOS
000005
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
Introduction
pPrerofdluucoerdooscytnathneetsiuclaflolnyibcyaceildecatnrdocihtsemsiacltasl (fPlFuoOrSi)naatrioenfoulrlyfrfolmuotrhienadteegdroardgaatniiocnomfooltehceurles
ofrlguaonriocchmeomlieccaullep,roPduFcOtSs pisrovdeurycesdtabbyleealnecdtrreoscihsetmsifcuarlthfelruodreignraatdiaotni.onA.sSaubfsutllayntfilauloriinnfaotremdation
orfelwaitdeedstporheuamdadnisatrnidbuetnivoinrionnmheunmtaanlseaxpnodstuhreesentvoiProFnOmSenhta.s PbeFeOnSdaetvevleroypeldopwrolevviedlisnhgaesvbiedeennce
ihduemntainfipeodpiunlasteirounsm,ainndvtairsisouuesssapmepclieessoffrwoimldbloitfhe,ocacnudpaitnisounraflalcye awnadtenrosn-aoncdcuotphaetrioennavlilryonemxepnotsaeld
mbieodlioag.icaAlnefefxetcetnssoivfethdeasteabeaxspeoshuarsesb.eeTnhdeevienlfoorpmeadtainond acvoanitlianbuleesatsoobfeJduelvye,l2o0p0e0d,otnogtehteheproswsiitbhle
athneamsestehsosdmesnatnodfphruomceadnuraensdoeuntvliirnoednmienntthaelSrcirskese,niisngcoInntfaoirnmeadtiinonthDisatraepoSrett. (STIhDeS)reMpoarntufaollloofws
the Organization for Volume Chemicals.
Economic
and
Cooperative
Development
Investigationof
High
Production
BPaFsOeSd fornotmheacwuirdreenvtalryiaevtayiolfabslaemipnlfeosrmhaatvieonnoptrbeseeennteadssioncitahitsedrewpiotrth,itdheentoibfisaebrlveeaddlveevresleseofffects ofnrohmuomnagnoihnegalstth,udwiielsdlwiiflel,boerutsheedenivnitrhoenmfeunttu.re tAodrdeiftiinoenathlidsaitnaiticaulrraesnstelsysmuenndte,r development TMhaeyp1r6i,m2ar0y00matnhuatfaitctwiulrlervoolfunPtFaOrSilyacnedasietsmparneucfuarscotrurmionlgecpuelrefslu(o3roMocCtoamnypla-nbyas)edanpnrooduuncctesd. oTnhe `icmopmlpeamneyntiisncgooappehraastei-noguwtiptlhatnhceaUl.liSn.gEfnovrimroosntmemnatnaulfaPcrtotuercitnigontoAcgeeansceybyantdheitesncdusotfo2m0e0r0s iannd all remaining manufacturing to cease by the end of 2002.
Environmental Exposure and Effects
Rceolmemaesrecsioafl PanFdOSenadnudsietsappprleiccuartsioorn,maolnedcauflteesr pcraondoucctcuursed.urAinnagltyhseeirsomafnmuafnaucftaucrte,urdiunrginwgasbtoeth swtarsetaemgseanenrdattheodseisaisnsotchieaftoedrmwiotfhscoloimdmwearsctiealwhaincdheinsdeiutshcerapipnlciicnaetriaotnesd ionrddiciastpeossethdatofmoinstof the laannddfsilulbss.eSqmuaelnlteerxapmoosuurnetstoarPeFrOeSleaasreedstiinllwtahsetesuwbajetcetrsoorftsoevaier.ralEnovni-rgoonimnegnsttaudlicfsa.te and transport
Tmohneiteoxrpionsgureeffporottse.ntiAalmoufltPi-FcOiSty isntutdhye edensviigrnoendmetnotobitsabieninignfdoertmeartmiionneadbbouytatnheumdbiseprerosfion of
cfulruroernotclhyemuincdaelrswaiyn .theAneontvhierronsmteundty, iunpvtoalkveesinatoglfooboadls,biaonsdphtehreiermporneisteonrcienginpsruorgfraacem waaitmeerdisat
uinnvdoelrvsetsangdaitnhgertihnegpsraemspelnecseooffgrPoFuOnSdwiantmearm,msaulrfsa,cefiwsahtaern,d sbeirddism.enFtisnaalnlyd,faisnhaadndidtiboinradlspsetcuideys
from the vicinity ofamanufacturing facility. presented in this report
Monitoring data collected
through July, 2000, are
rat ni ssn ReposPFS
v
000006
Nbeuemnercoonudsucatceudt,e aanndd tchherodnaitcatforxoicmittyhessteudsiteusdiiensvoplrvoivnigdefraessuhbwsattaenrtiaanldbamsairsifnoerocrhgaarnacitsemrsizhianvge pboitrednstiinalwrhiisckhs tPoFaOqSuathiacsabneiemnalfs.ounEdffheacvtes onnottbheeepnarsttiucduileadr,sbpuetciceosnosfidteerrarebslteridaaltwailodnlisfuerraongdate amvaamilmaabllei,ainntsepre-csipeesciheasveextbreaepnolgaetnieornatiesd.an Ianccseipttueatdipornsacwthiceereinsepceocilfoigcicsaplecriiessk aefsfseecstssmdeantta, awriethnot the recognition that there arc some uncertainties associated with such extrapolation. Initial Assessment of Ecological Risk
`eTnhviisrionnitmieanltaaslseasnsdmweinltdlriefpeorctonacpepnltiersataiwoenlsla-raeccceopmtpeadremdetwhiotdholtooxgiyc,itwyhtehrreeisnholledvseltshaotfare derived
from the various indicate that the
studies. observed
Under this approach levelsofPFOS from
to a
risk assessment, the currently wide varietyof environmental
available samples
data have
not
braeteinosaisnsdoicciaatteeda wwiitdheimdaenrtgiifniaobflesaafdevteyr,sbeuetfiftecsthsoutoldwibledlriefceoagnnidztehdetehnavtiurnocnemretnati.ntyCaelxicsutlsatinedthis
aunnacleyrstias.intUysienotfhsiseerxutrmapaonldatliiovne.r dAatnauamsbaemroefaasdudrietoiofnianlteemnavlirdoonsmeenrteadlucsetsudsioemsearoefutnhederway or
planned to refine this initial assessment.
Human Exposures
In the 1960's and 0.10 ppm. In the
1970's, 1990's,
organic fluorine was identified in as a result ofimproved analytical
human serum at levels less than techniques, routine measurements
of
sinpesceifriucmorfgraonmofhluumoarninsewcihtehmoicccaulpsabtieocnaamleafnedasniobnle-.ocTchuipsatailolnoawleedxpfoorsutrheesm.eaOcscuurpeamteinotnoaflPlyFOS
epxppmosweidthflhuiogrhoecsthelmeivcealls patroadpupcrtoixoinmawtoerlkyer1s0hpapvme.meIanasulriemditseedrn um Pu FOSofm lneovne-lb osctehuae tpaatvier ornaagle 2.0
bseatmtpelrecsh,arsaecrtuemriPzeFtOhSe dliesvterlisbhutaivoenorfansgeerdubmePtwFeOeSn 0in.0n1on--0o.c1c0uppaptmi.onaRlespeoapruclahtiisonosn.going to
Health Effects
`mTuhletidgaetnaebraasteioinncrleupdreosdsuecvteiroanl/sduebv-eclhorpomneinctasltusdtiuedsieisn,raondeenxttsenasnidvenoarnr-ahyoumfagnenportiomxaitceis,ty fests, teoxxpiocsoekdinweotirckewrosrakreanadvacihlarbolnei.c Tsthudeicsst.udiIensaadrdeiotfigono,osdeveqruaallietpyiadnemdiaoclcoegpitcaablleinfvoerstuisgeatiinonhsazianrd evaluation.
SmoervtearlailtyinovresstpiegcaitfiiocncsliinnivcoallvsiinggnsflautotrroibcuhteambilceatlopPrFodOuScteixopnoswuorrek.er3sMshhoaws ncoonedvuicdteendcemoefdiecxacless
tseusrtvseiilnlcalnucdeoinfgpleirpfildsu,orhoecmhaetmoilcoaglicparlodpaurcatmieotnewros,rkeenrzsyfmoersovaenrd 2101 ydeiafrfse.renAt bhaotrtmeroynoefacslsianyicsa)l
suphotwoe6dpnpom.assAocmioarttiaolniwtiytshtPudFyOsSholewveedls;notheexsceesfsinmdoirntgaslwietyrefobraasneyd coanusseeorfumdelaetvhe,lsiinnclwuodriknegrs
cancer. Allof this information suggests that workers are not at risk at the serum levels reported.
Dra nitsessment ReportPFS
"
000007
SItiinceretahseonparboldeucttoiaosnswuomrekftohrecsee swtourdkieerdsihsalvaergtehley hmiaglhee,stthleesveelstoufdiheusmdaonneoxtpaodseuqrueatteolPyFrOeSp,resent
women. It is noted studies with respect
t(h0atthmealnaetaurnedoffaedmvaleersmeonefkfeeyctss
responded observed.
similarly
in
sub-chronic
dosing
tRheesuplrtismafrryomtasregveetraolrgraenp.eaMtadnoisfeesttoaxtiicoonlsoogifclailvesrtutdiisessuecornessipsotnesnteltyodheimgohnsdtorsaetseotfhaPtFtOhSe liinvcelruidse reendluacrtgieomnenintsoefrtuhme clhiovelresatnedroalpparaereenatrlayltreersaptoinonssesintomePtFaObSol.icThpreosceesesfefse.ctsLoivcecrurenilnarragtsemaesnwteallndas monkeys.
rAelssuoltoatfhmiagthedronsaelsePxpFoOsSuraedvdeurrsienlgyfaeftaflecdtesvseulrovpivmaelnotfrRaetdpuucpesdiwnetihgehtnegoaniant,aalbpoerrtiioodnosfanldife as a orensodrepvteiloonpsmaernetsaelemnilinesdteovneelso,pimnecnltuadlinsgtupdoisets-naattatlhenehuirgohleorgdicoaslesdetevseteldo.pmTehnetr,eorweornefnerotielfiftyecatnsd estrous cycling in offspring in multi-generation studies. pMruelsteinptlea gheanzoatrodxifcriotmy ianstsearyasctcioovnewriitnhg gaevnaertiiectymoatfeernidalp.oiTnhtes rdeesmuolntsstorafatetwtoha-tyePaFrOcSandcoeerssntoutdy in rats will be available in the next several months
PFOS is well-absorbed elimination half-life for
orally PFOS
and very slowly eliminated is approximately 300 days
from the body. The in humans, based on
mean serum a continuing
study
sotfurdeiteidr,edalftlhuoourgohchiet mciacnalbewofrokremres.d mPetFaOboSliiscanloltymfertoambooltihzeerdfilnuoarnoychoefmtihcealmsulctoinptlaeisnpiencgitehse
dpoeerfslunootroporcetfaenreesnutilaflolnyyldimsotiriebtuyt.e tUonlfaitktey tmiassnuye,cphreemfiecrarlisngoifensntveiardotnomeasnstoacliactoenwsietqhuepnrcoete,inPsFiOnS
blood milk.
and Due
liver. to the
It has good
been found to cross the placenta, oral absorption, poor elimination
and and
there is evidencefordistribution extensive protein binding, PFOS
in
PcoFnOceSntcroantcieonntsraitniolinvsercaanndbeseursuemd aarseapnroipnotretgiroatneadl mteoacsuumrueloafteixvepoesxpuorseuroev.erTthiemree,forreeg,arsdelresusmof
source.
mSeevcehraanlisinmv(ess)titghartoioungsh hwahviechbePeFnOcSonedxuecrttesdiotsrtaorxeiciitnyp.roWghrielses tnootbectoemprluentdeelrystuannddertshteood at this atsismoec,itahteedmewcithhanfaitsmme(tsa)booflitsomx.icity is thought to include changes in metabolic processes
Initial Assessment of Human Risk
rReevteraolsepdecetxicveescsomhoorrttalmiotrytailnitaynyascsaetsesgmoernytosf doifseflausoer.ocPheFmOiScallepverlosduucptitoon6wpoprkmerins phraovdeucntoiton
lwioprikdse,rshehmaavteolnoogtibcepeanraamsesotceirasteadndwi1t1h daibfnfoerrmenatlihtoiresmoinn eclvianliuceasl)t.esCtoinngsi(dcehremiinsgttrhieesstiundcyluded
pirnfoodrumcaetitooxnicaivtayil(acbhloeletsotdeartoel,laonwdergiinvgeanntdhelidviesrtianbcntolrymhailgithieersP),FiOtSisluenvleilkseilny atnhaitmawlosrkneercseswsoauryldto
have these abnormalitiesa the levels to which they have been exposed. Current knowledge
rat ilvest Report POS
wi
000008
tihndaincpatreosdutchtatiognenweorrakleprospuatlatthieohnisgehrearleenvdeolsfatrheearpapnrgoexiimnattheelsye tstwuodioersd.ersofmagnitude lower Aeflftehctosugahretchoenrseisitsensto.meFuspretchieersmovraer,iatthieonfaicnttthheatletvheelssaatmwehmiecahsuPrFeOoSfeixnpdoucseusreto(xisceirtuym, tvhaeluteoxsicf.or aPnFdOSul)tiimsautseeldy htouemxatnrarpioslka.teThaceroisnsfosrpmeactiieosnraevdauicleasbltehetoundcaetretoainnttoyxiinciutnydaesrssotcainadtiendgweixtphoPsFuOreS. osredreurmsolfevmealgsniintdiucdaetelsotwheart PthFaOnSselreuvmelsleivneltsheingeanneirmaallpsotpuudliaetsitohnataraereapapsrsoocxiiamtaetdelwyitthwnootoadtvherresee health effects.
Conclusion
`sTuhbisstarnetpioarltbsoudmymoafrdiaztesa trheelaitninfgorhmuatmiaonn atnhadteinsvaivraoinlambelnetaalsoefxpJousluyr2e0s,t2o00P0F.OSThaenrdetihseapossible
bfiooulnodgiicnalocecfufpeacttsioofnatlhaensed enxopno-soucrceusp.atTihoinsalinpfooprumlaattiioonnssuagrgeensotts atshsaotchiautmeadnwistehruamdvPerFsOeSeflfeecvtesl.s
Similarly, Additional
levels found in the environment research now underway will be
and in wildlife are used to refine this
not associated with initial assessment.
adverse
effects
rat itlAsesonesReportPOS
000009
INTRODUCTION
Background
The human health and ecological risk assessment process for PFOS contained in thirseport
follows the methods and procedures outlined in the Screening Information Data Set (SIDS)
Manual ofthe Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development (OECD) Programme
On the Co-Operative Investigation of High Production Volume Chemicals (OECD, 1997). In
particular, this report follows
Assessment Report, which is
the provisional guidance
discussed in Chapte4rof
for
the
the outlineofthe SIDS Initial
manual. The environmental portion
of
the SIDS Initial Assessment Report is effectively a Tier I Screening-Level Risk Assessment as
envisioned by U.S. EPA. This format was followed recognizing that this initial assessment
report is to be part of the OECD Existing Chemicals Program.
Overall, the assessment presents, evaluates, explains, and combines information on PFOS
exposure and effects into an initial assessmentofpotential risk Based on current information, the
observed levels of PFOS from a wide variety of samples are not associated with identifiable
adverse effects in humans, wildlife, or the environment. The information in this report is based on a substantial bodyofdata and represents our current knowledge. Additional information is currently under development and will aid in improving this initial assessmentofrisk of PFOS to `human health and the environment.
dSeescctriiobnes1oiftsthpihsysriecpoocrhtepmriocvaildepsrotpheertPieFsO;SanCdAdSisncuumssbeesr,thmeobleehcauvliaorrfiomrpmluilcaa,tiaonnd`socofmtphoessietion; characteristics, such as anticipated sources, sinks, and bioaccumulation. Section2 presents
general information on ecological and human exposures to PFOS, including its uses and
function, production volume and expected exposure pathways. Ecological exposure, effects on aquatic and terrestrial ecosystems, and other ecological effects are described in Section 3.
Human health exposures, potential hazards, and risks are evaluated in Section 4. Section 5 presents the conclusions and recommendationsof this assessment, and the literature and data
`sources upon
compound's
which this documentisbased are listed
physicochemical properties are included
in
in
Section
Append
6.
ix
Su
I.
mmary Reports for the
Appendix II presents
`Summary Reports for aquatic toxicological studies. Reports summarizing the environmental
exposure studies are included in Appendix III. Appendix IV lists planned environmental studies
on PFOS. Appendix V contains summary reportsof mammalian toxicology studies.
Overview of PFOS
`The fluorochemicals discussed in this document are produced by an electrochemical process that
exchanges allof the hydrogen atoms ofan organic feedstock with fluorine atoms from hydrogen
fluoride. The highest volume perfluorochemical produced in this way is.perfluorooctane
sulfonyl fluoride
2000. Using this
(pPeOrSflFu)o.roOorvgearniecigmhotlmeiclullieonaspoabuansdiscofbutihlisdi`ncgobmlpoocukn,dunwiilqluebechpermoidsutcreidesicnan
be
created by further reactions with functionalized hydrocarbon molecules. These `compounds repel
wthaetierrparonpderotili,esreudnudceerseuxrtfraceemetecnosnidoint,iocnast.alyDzeepoelnidgionmgeruipzaotniotnheasnpdecpiofliycmfeurnicztaitoinoanl,daenridvamtaiiznattaiionn
i
000010
PorFOtSh.e dePgFreOeSofispotlheymsetraiblzeatainodn,pesruscishtePnOtSeFn-db-apsreodducctomthpaotuhnadsstmheapyotdeengtriaaldetoorbimoeatcacbuomluilzaetet.o
In the under
environment, any observed
PFOS is resistant conditions except
to chemical and for combustion.
biological PFOS or
changes and does not precursors enter the
degrade
tehnevmisreolnvemse.nt Mtehrcohuagnhisfamcstobryy wdihsicchharPgeFsO,Sascamnanbuefatcrtaunsrpionrgterdestihdruoalusghinthperoednuvcitrsoonrmeanstpriondculcutdse
transport in and uptake
surface water, adsorption onto particles present by aquatic, avian or terrestrial organisms.
in
air,
surface
water
and
sediments,
`The ability to detect and quantify PFOS and environment has been limited until recently,
its precursor compounds at when reliable and sensitive
very low methods
levels in the for extracting,
asveapialraabtlien.g,Faonrdthiidsenrteiafsyoinn,g kannodwqlueadngteifoyfintghetehnevmirinontmiessnuteaslafnadteoenfvtihriosnmcelanstsaolfscahmepmliecsablsechaamse
pbaeretniteinohnainncgebde.havRieosre,aarcnhd issigunnidfiecrawnatysutrofaascseeascstiPviFtyO.S Uanccceurmtualianttiieosnaibnotuhtetehnevaiprpolnimceanbitl,itaytyopfical
cexoimsptliincgatfaetteh-eancdh-atrraacntseproirztatmioodneolfs tahnedegnaviprsoinnmpehnytsailcfoactheeomficPaFlOSan.d Meonvrieroinnmfeonrtmaatlidoantias ablesiong
rgealtehaesreesdftroobmetptreorduuncdtemrasntuafnadcetnuvrieroannmdenustea,lifnactel.udTihngisdeivneclluodpeisngefffoarttes-atnod-hterlapnscphoarrtacmtoedriezles and
designing methods to sample various habitats and speciesof interest,
lPoFcaOtSionhsa.s bItei enpfeorsuinsdteanttlaonwdlweivdelesspirnesaadmpinlehsuomfahnupmoapunlasteironusm. frTohmesmeevecrhaalnsiosumrsceasnadnpdathways
feading to its presence multiple sourcesof the
in human blood are compound. Some
not may
well characterized, but iti arise from environmental
likely there are exposure to PFOS
or
precursor molecules, or from production workers have the
residual levelsofprecursors to PFOS highest known blood levels of PFOS.
in commercial products. 3M Epidemiological and medical
`seuxrpvoesiulrlea.ncAensetxutdenisoifvethteosxiecwoolorgkiecrasl hdaavteabnaosteaosnsoPcFiaOtSedaanddvesrpesceifhiecalptrhecefufrescotrsmwoiltehctuhliess
cionnftoirnmuaetsiotnoibnedidceavteelsotpheadt.cuWrhreinltelmevueclhsowfoPrFkOiSn tahries anroetaaisssotciilatiendpwriotghreisdse,nttihfeiaabvlaeilaadbvleerse
effects to human health.
`tThheemaonsatlyatciccaulravtaeluiensforremparteisoenntaevdaiilnabthliesarseopforJtulrye,su2lt00f0r.omFovrarthiiosusdamteat,hfoidnaolloregpioerstsanhdavreepbreeesnent pirsessueendtolry abreeinign cproenpdaurcattieodn.toTcoomepnlseutreeltyhechmaorsacttearciczuerastaemapnlaelsytuiscaeld riensutletsstipnogsasinbdlea,nawloyrsiksiosver wthheiclahstthfieswdoyecaurms.enBtasisedbaosnedthweilrlesbueltrseovifsefdu.rtThehrerpeufroirtey,antahleysniusm,btehresvianlutehissidnotchuemreenpotrtwsouulpdon also be modified in future revisions.
Drath nitsesResportPROS
2
000011
1.0 IDENTITY
Chemical Name: Perfluorooctane Sulfonic Acid
CAS Number: Various, including:
1763-23-1 (acid) 29081-56-9 (ammonium salt)
70225-14-8 (DEA salt)
22709455-73-97-23-5(p(olittahsisuimumsaslat)lt)
The
and
perfluorooctane sulfonate anion (PFOS) has no specific
salts are all considered perfluorooctane sulfonates.
CAS
number.
The
above-listed
acid
Molecular formula: ~ C,HF,,0,8
Structural formula:
CR CF CF CF NCon
CF, ch, Ch Ch o
Synonyms:
1-Octanesulfonic acid, 1,1,2,2,3,3,4.4,5.5,6,6,7,7,8,8,8-
heptadecafluoro-; 1,1,2,2,3,3,4,4,5,5,6,6,7,7,8,8,8Heptadecafluoro-1-octanesulfonic acid; 1-Octanesulfonic
aHceipdt,adheecpatafdleucoarfol-u1o-rooc-t;an1e-sPuelrffolnuiocroaoccitda;nPeesrufllfuoonrioc-nac-id; octanesulfonic acid; Perfluorooctanesulfonic acid;
Perfluorooctylsulfonic acid
Table 1-1.
Physical and Chemical Properties (See Appendix I
for Robust Summaries)
Vapor Pressure.
n-Octanol/Water Partition Coefficient Air-Water Partition Coefficient Solubility in Pure Water
Dr i AssenRorFOS
5/05/99
2/11/00
3/19/00 5/03/99
331x10P@20
C Not measurable
0(<2x10%) 519 mg/L
;
000012
1.1 Discussion
PFOS appears to be undergo hydrolysis
stable in the or photolysis.
environment. Based on an
This compound is not biodegradable and analysisof bond strength the compound
does is
not
destroyed by combustion at high temperatures. The very low vapor pressure and immeasurable
air/water coefficient indicate that volatilityof the `compound is insignificant.
PFOS hasa
seawater to
solubility of about 519 mg/L in pure water.
about 25 mg/L. These data suggest that any
Solubility decreases
PFOS discharged to
significantly in
a water source
would tend to remain in that medium, unless it is adsorbed onto particulate matter or assimilated by organisms. If PFOS does bind to particulate matter the material would ultimately end up in
vthaerisoeudsimleocnatt.ioFnusratnhedrtshteubdiynidsiungndpeotrewnatyiatloo fdePtFerOmSinteotsheedipmreenstesn.ce of PFOS in sediments from
PFOS is not anticipated to be present in the atmosphere becauseof ts extremely low volatility. In fact, obtaining an air/water partition coefficient reading for PFOS has not been possible `PbFecOaSusies tchoenpsairdteirteidonuinnlgikhealys.been too small to measure. Therefore, atmospheric dispersion of
nB-eoccatuasneool/fwattheercpoamrptiotuinodni'nsg scuoreffaficceiaecnttihvaesprnooptebrteieens paonsdsitblhee.teTsht eprdoitfofcioculltityseilnf,mdeeatseurrmiinnginthgisthe
coefficient is caused by the formation ofa third layer between the water and the n-octanol.
Because the octanol/water
and transport mechanisms,
coefficient
a different
is
te
used extensively
st method will be
in models to predict bioconcentration
used to determine the coefficient. An
actual bioconcentration study will also be performed.
Even with this information, classic models (which are based on log P, or K,,,forpredicting bioconcentration) may not be appropriate. Studies performed on laboratory rats show PFOS does not bioconcentrate in the lipid fraction but tends to bind to certain proteins. These findings may `negate the utility ofthe conventional models, whichare based on measuresofaffinity for lipids.
ornmi
000013 :
2.0 GENERAL INFORMATION ON EXPOSURE
General Information on Exposure
Peleercftlruoocrhoeomcitcaanle fsluulofroinniactiaocni.d T(hPeFOsSt)artisinag ffueleldysftloucokrifnoarttehdeoerlgeacntircoacchiedmipcraoldfulcueodribnyation reaction
fislu1o-roicdtea(nPeOsSuFl)f.onyPlOfSluForiisdae caonmdmtehreciparliimzaerdy pprroodduucctt ptorosdoumceedexitsenpte,rfbluutoirtooisctparniemasruillfyonaynl
PimFpOorStaisntitisnetleafrmceodmimaeterciinatlhiezseydnpthreosdiusctofprhoigdhuecredmoflreocmultahre wheiygdhtrfoluolorfyocPshOeSimFis.cal3pMrosdeulcltss.
sauprpfraocxtianmtataeplpyli5c0a,ti0o0n0sp(omuanidnslypefrirye-fiegohtfiaPngFrOfoSamisn avanrdiocuosatsianltg afodrdmist.iveIst)i.sUunsieqduefocrhaemviasrtireiteysofare
hcryedartoecdabrbyofnurrtehaecrtidoenrsi.vaPtiOziSng iPsOrSeaFcttehdrwoiutghh tmheethsyulloforneytlhfylluoarmiidenemotioeptryoduusicnegecitohnevrenNt-imoentahlyl
aomriNd-eest,hyolxapzeorlfilduionroonoecst,ansielsanuelsf,oncaamribdoex.ylaAttesthainsdstaalgkeo,xytlhaesteesianstecrommemdieartceisaclapnrbodeuuctsse.d tTohmesaeke
einttheyrlmpeedrifaltueosrocoacntabneessuulbfsoenqaumeindteltyharneoalc.tedThweisthe eitnhtyelremneedicaatrebsocnaantebteoufsoerdmtocimthaekreN-admieptahteysl,or N-
`phosphate products.
esters, fatty acid See Figure 2.1.
esters,
urethanes
copolymers,
and
acrylates
as
commercialized
[ET r------
s
000014
Figure 2.1 POSF Fluorochemical Reaction Tree
Alcohols
Fatty Acid Esters
Urethanes
PhosphaleEsters
Copolymers
Adipates
Acres
N-Alkylperfluorooctanesulfonamidoethanol
Amides
Oxazoldinones
Amines
N-Alkyiperfluorooctanesulfonamide
Silanes Carboxylates
Alkoxylates
Quaternary Ammonium Salts
Amphoterics
Peruorooctanesulonyl uoride
Sulfonates
y----
.
000015
Tprhoecessesceosndthaartydroeancottionnescepsrsoadruilcyinpgroaldluofcethpeusreepdreordiuvcattsi.vesThaereresimnaglyeboer vseaqruyeinntgiaalmobautncths of arfleucoarrorciheedmifcoarlwarredsitdouatlhse(fuinnraleapcrtoedducotr.paTrytpiailclayllrye,acttheedsestraerstiidnugamlastaerreiaclusrroerntilnyteprrmeesdeinatteast)athat ctoontcheentsrualftoinoynlofflu1o%riodre glersosuipnocfotmhmeesrecireasliidzueadlsprcoadnucbte. reTmhoevneodn-tfhlruoourgohcahevmairciaeltyomofideetgireasdaadtdieodn psruocchedsesgersa(dcahteimoincawli,llebneviPrFonOmSe.ntHali,ghaenrdmmoelteacboulliacr).weiTghhet tpeorlmyimnearlifclfulouroorcohcehmeimciaclamlopireotdyucotfs tend to be stable and do not degrade to PFOS by these same processes.
`fTloutoalrowcohrelmdicwaildse(PpOolSyFmeprrsodauncdtimoonnboyme3rMs)inar2e0f0o0rmwiulllatbeed8w,i0t0h0,w0a0t0erIbos.r sPolOvSeFn-t,dewriitvhetdhe
ffolrumourloacthieomni.caTlotcaolmpfolunoernotch(eomrifclaulosroolcihdesmiicnacllusdoelitdhse)hryedprroecseanrtbionngraeavcatrainatbslecopemrbciennetdofwitthhe the
fflluuoorroocchheemmiiccaall sstoalritdisnrgemparteesreinatltahnedmadjoorniottyroefprtehseenttottalheprPoOdSucFtimoonloefcusluelfiotsneyllf.ba3sMedproduced
fluorochemicals in the world product categories include:
The breakdownof3M
fluorochemical production
into different
Surface Treatments (High Molecular Weight (MW) polymers or formulated
products solids)
with
low
percentages
of
non-polymeric
FC
Carpet Protector
Fabric/Upholstery Protector
Apparel and Leather Protector
Protective Products for After Markets and Consumer Application
Paper and Packaging Food Packaging
Protectors
(Phosphate
esters
or
high
MW
polymers)
Paper Products
FPierrefEoxrtmianngucieshCihnegmFicoaalmsC(oLncoewntMraWteschemical substances) Mining and Oil Surfactants Electroplating and Etching Bath Surfactants Household Additives Chemical Intermediates Coatings and Coating Additives Carpet Spot Cleaners Insecticides Raw Materials
Pmoatneunftaicaltusroiunrgceospeorfahtiuomnasnanodr ewnavsitreosntmreenatmasl, etxhepomsaunruefatcotPuFriOnSg ionpcelruadteiotnhseapnrdodwuacsetre'sstreams of
users of POSF-based commercial products
fluorochemical products, and the use or degradationofsome containing POSF-based fluorochemicals.
final
Dra itl sessReportPOS
'
000016
`(T3hMe)prhiamsaarnynmoaunnucfeadcttuhraterisofprPoFdOuSc-tbioansoefd tchheesmeicmaatlesricaalpsabwlielolfbpeotseunbtsitaanltliyaldleygrdaisdcionngttionuPeFdObSy
tuhseesenwidlolf c2o0n0t0i.nueMafonrufaalcitmuirteedatnidmedipsetrriiboudtitohneroefafatefr.ew,Thweelcl-odmepfainneyd ipsrwoodrucktisnghawviitnhgtehseseUn.St.ial
EPA and with its perfluorooctanyl
customers to implement chemical products by the
an orderly transition end of 2002.
away
from
all
such
raf ia sessment epon Pr0S
.
000017
3.0 ENVIRONMENT
3.1 Environmental Exposure
Tinhitsheseecntviiornondmiesnctu.sseAssavpaairltaoblfea ilnafrogremrasttiuodny,onmotnhietporreisnegndcaeotafhpaevreflbueoernooccotlalnecetseudlffoornastuerf(aPcFeOS)
``wmaotneirtocroilnugmpnrosagmrpalmesh.asSruesmumltaerdyinreapnoarltyssiasroefpmreosreenttehdainn4A0p0pearncdhiixveIdIL.seArugmloabnadl bliivoesrphere
specimens Section 3.1
from and
a wide rangeof are summarized
aquatic and terrestrial in Tables 3-2, 3-3 and
species. 3-4.
These
data
are
described
in
3.1.1 General Discussion
Exposure Potential
OmanteerpioatlesntiinatlhseowuarscteoefstPrFeaOmSs geexnpeorsautreedifsrtohme rtehleemasaenutfoatchteuerinnvgirpornomceesnst,ofsuPpOpSlyF-cdhearinived dopeetreartmiionnast,ioannsd, cesotnismuamteesroufsc3.MBawsaesdteonsterxetaemnsgievneereantgiionneehraivneg bcealecnuldaetriiovnesd.an3dMmahsass bnaolance information on waste streams from other producers and users ofthese materials.
Gienntehrealfloyr,mtohfe PwaFsOtSesitgseenlfe,rbauttedraftrhoemr itnhethmeanfuoframocftuhriegahndmoulseecouflaPrOwSeFigdhetrpioveldymmaetreircimaaltsearriealns,ot d`wehgircahdactoinotnaoifn stmhaelploalmymoeurnitcsosfubrsetsaindcueasl imsovleercyulceosmwphliecxhanmdayeffboertpsreacruerusonrdsertowaPyOtSo.undTehrestand. the mechanism and the extent to which they may degrade to PFOS.
iFnrtohme tfhoersmotafndspooliidntwoafstwea,stwehitcyhpei,sacpiptrheorxiimnacitneelryat9e0d%oorfditshpeowseadsotfe giennlearnadftieldls.froTmheallresmoauircneisngis
wastes are discharged as wastewater (~9%) or will improve the understandingof the possible
as air emissions (~1%). mechanisms associated
Several ongoing studies with environmental fate
and transport of PFOS. (See Appendix IV.)
`aTrheebeexipnogsduerteepromtiennetdiatlhfrrooumghwaassteerigcesnoefrmaotniiontosroiunrgceesffaonrtds.actFuoarl eexnavmiprloen,meantmaulltcio-ncicteyntsrtautdiyonwsas duepstiagkneeidnttoo foobotdasi,nainndfoprrmeasteinocneaibnosuutrtfhaecediwsapteerr.sioTnhofefpluuroprooscehoefmtihcealsstuindyth,ewhenivcihrohnasmebnete,n iannidtieactoedlobguitcanlotexcpoomspulreet.edW,hiesrteo ipomspsriobvlee,tshaemupnldeesrswtearneditnagkeonfotrhewiploltebnetitaalkseonufrrcoesmotfhehsuumrafance wtoatpeurblciocllyumonwnaendd sturrefaatcmeenmticwroorlkasy,ers,lusdegdei,meanntd,lrainvdefrilflislhe,acdhraitne.kinAgddwiattieorn,ailnlfyl,ueant"maanrdkeeftfluent dbeafsikneitt"ivoefseexvpeorsaulrefoanoadlypsriosd.ucTthsewislulrfbaecesawmaptleerd.coTlhumendadtaatafcroolmletchtiesdstasudpyarwtiollftphriosvisdteudaymwoerree used to create the Initial Assessment for the Environment (Section 3.3.1).
raf nin sscssmen Repo Pr0S
000018
Tinwvoolovtehsear gsltoubdailesbairoespuhnedreermwoanyittoorcihnagrapcrtoergirzaemtaheimeexdpoastuurnedpeortsetnatnidalinogftPhFeOdSi.strTibhuetifoinrsotfstPuFdOyS. OinfaPFvaOrSieteyxopfoosrugraentiostmhse,sesourcghaansismmasm.maIlnst,hisfiassh,seasnsdmebnitrd,s.thTisheisnefodramtaatipornoviisdceoambdiirneecdt mweitahsutrhee orfestuhltosseofexepcoostuorxeisc,oliofgaincya.l Ttehsetidnigsacunsdsimoanmomfalthieanfitnodxiincgistyfrtoesmtitnhigstboiuonsdpehresrteapnrdotghreapmotaenndtiraelsurlitssk ofecological effects studies are presented in Section 3.2.
`ATlhaebsaemcao)n.dSsatmudpyleissobfegirngoucnodnwdautcetre,d siunrtfhaeceviwcaitneirt,y soefdaimmeanntusf,acatnudrfiinsgh faancdilbitiyrd(Dsepceactiuers,have bcoenecnenctorlaltecitoends ainndpraongarleyssseisvearleevienlpsroofgrtehses.foTohdiwsesbtuadnyd,wiilnlcaolnsjoupnrcotviiodnewiintfhoortmhaetrioinnfoonrmPaFtiOoSn, will be used to develop an analysisof the biomagnification characteristicsof this compound.
Exposure and Release Management
3prMiorhatso tahlarteaadnynoaunnncoeumnecnetd,tsheavteirtawlilalctvioviltuinetsartiolryecdeuacseetphreowdausctteioanondfePmOisSsFiocnhsemfirsotmry3.MEven pmraoncuefsasctuunrdienrgstoapnedriantgiohnasveanbdeteoniemnphraonvceedp,rothdeucltevqeulaolfitryehsaidduablesenanidmpwlaesmteenstefdr.om Ptrheoduct and omfanturfeaactmteunrtinegquoippemreatnito)n,smhoasvtefbleueonrorcehdeumciecdal(tshorliodugwhasitmeprmoatveerdiaplrsocfersosmc3onMtrmolasnuafnadctiunsrtianlglation rheacveeivheadthaenrdmawliltlrecaotnmteinntu,eatnodhtahveeparosiggrnaimfoifcapnrtoidmupcatctphoansree-douuctiinsgutnhdeerewxapyo.surAelpootfentthieasle fsrteopms 3M manufactured fluorochemicals.
3.1.2. Predicted Environmental Concentrations (PEC)
AdesritvheedSbIaDsSedMoannumaolniitnodriciantgesd,attaheanpdr/eodricctaeldcuelnavtiiroonnumseinntgalexcpoonsceunrtermaotdieonlso.r PAEtCthisshotuilmed,bet:he
dPeFvOeSloapnmdentthoefopverreadlilctcihavreacmtoedreisltsicissofintaheveprryoedaurcltyssatangde.waTstheespihryesaimcsalm/achyemhiicnadlerprtohpeerties of
dwehvieclhoaprmeennottofapvraeildaibclteifvoermtohidselcso.mpTyopuincda.llTy,hetshee mfoacdteolrssacraelrefoqruitrheedufsocropfreldoigctPinogr K,, factors,
bioconcentration and, cannot be determined.
becauseof the surface active properticsof In addition, the natureofexposure routes
the compound, the factors would add considerable
`complexity atmosphere
to or
the its
developmentof these models. binding potential in ecological
For example, PFOS degradation in the species or compartments such as sediments
is
nEontvifruollnymeunndte,rsistoboads.edCoonnsaecqtuueanltmloyn,ittoherianngaldyastiaswphriescehntaered liinkeSleycttioobne3.m2o,rEeffreecltisabilne tthhean
modeling estimates for this compound.
rat ital sess Report PFOS
10
000019
tDhaetsaeadraetaavaanidlatbhlee efxrtoemnstihveemeuclottio-xciictyolsotguidcyalanadndthaenigmloablatlebstiionsgphreesrueltmso,ntihteoprriendgicptreodgram. With `ecnovimrpoonumnedntcaaln cboenctehnotrroautgiholnysc(oPmEpCasr)eda.ndThtihse pirnefdoircmtaetdionnoiesfpfercetsecnotnecdenitnrtahteiofnosl(loPwNinEgCs)ecotfiotnsh.e 3.1.2.1 Surface Waters
PStFrOauSssc,o2n0c0e0n)t.ratFioornscaicnhscuirtfya,cae lwiastteorfskweeyr3eMansaulpypzleyd cinhasianmcpulsetsofmreorms swiaxscigteineesr(aNteids,hiaonkda tahned
locations of the customers were determined. identification of surfacewaterbodies in both
Examining the various locations resulted the upstream and downstream vicinityof
in the the key
3POMSFc-ubstaosmeedrsm.anTuhfaecltoucraitnigonasnwdefrleucohroocsheenmitcoailntuesgerabtye tkheeypsoutepnptliyalchPaFinOSsouerxcpeos.surIendaudedittoioanl,l a
"aqnudieltocwaattieorns" asriteecwoanstalionceadteidn tathecascthudcyitdyeseixgcn.eptAfodreCsclreivpetliaonndo,ftTehnenessitseese.forDeetaacihlsciotyn itshefosuitneds
in Table 3-1
Aprteseeancthsctihtey rseasmupltlsinofgthsiete,latbwoorawtaotreyransaalmypsilse.s wAerseiteanaavleyrzaegde faonrdPaFmOaSxciomncuemntvraatliuoena.reTable 3-1
ptarbelse.entTehdefoarveeraacghecaitnyd. mTahxeirmeupomrtvianlguelismiatrse ausneddmientthhoedrdisekteacstsieosnslmiemnittsaanraelyisnedsicparteesdenintetdhein
Section 3.2. Lucie 2,930
The largest concentration parts per trillion (ppt) and
of PFOS was found in the quiet the second largest at Decatur
surface (114 ppt).
water The
in
Port
St.
c2o5npcpetn.trOaftitohnossoefcPitFiOesSwiatthClaevveerlaagned,PTOenSnecsosnecee,ntwrearteioanlsl glresesattehranthtahnetlhiemirtepoofrqtuianngtilifmiicta,tion of
CPeonlsuamcboulas,, FGleoorrigdia,a,hhaaddthtehesmsaelcloensdt ldaertgeecsttabalveeraavgeeraPgFeOPSFOcoSncceonntcreanttiroantoifono80f.205p.p7t pwpht.ile
`uTnhdeeransatloyotdicbaultafirnedcionngssiodfertheedPtoortbeSta.nLauncioemaqluiyetinwtahteermuslatmi-pcliitnygdalotcaasteit.on TahreenPotFOcoSmplleveetleslayt
twhiitshsoittehearreficnodnisnigdseraatbPloyrthiSgt.heLructihea.n Tothheersaqmuipeltinwgatseirtesiisteasrienlatthievesltyudsymaalnldaanrde sntoatgcnoannstisptoenndt
about 200 styrofoam
feet and
by 200 feet. bottles.
The
pond
contained
considerable
manmade
debris
including
plastic,
3.1.22 Biota
`STahmepblieosspohfebrleoomdo,niltioverri,nagnpdrootghrearmtiwsassuesdweesirgenceodlltoecatsesdesfsrtohmeagrlcohbiavleddisstpreicbuitmieonnsoof PfaFOvSa.riety of
species from several (the Great Lakes and
locations and analyzed for coastal marine locations),
PFOS. Areasoffocus the Arctic, and Europe.
included North America Analysesof these
s(faimsphl-eeastiinngd)icaantiemdaltsh.atTPaFbOleSsi3s-p2reasnednt3-i3n sthuemmliavreirszeantdheserresaoulftsoafnitmhaelss,e easnpaelcyisaelsl.y Tinhepihsicgihveosrtous
average concentrations of PFOS in biota was found in the bloodofbald eagles and the liver of
rap ilAssam Repr POS
u
000020
minks. 4).
Average concentrations in other tissues and other species were relatively lower (Table 3-
eCnovnicreonntrmaetnitoanlsoexfpoPsFurOeS. mIenaslaubroerdationrybltoooxidcaitnydtleisvtesrowiftwhirladtlsifaendapmpoenakretyosb,ePvFalOiSd mweaassufroeusndofto
dsiesrturmibuPtFeOtSo bvlaoloudesanidnclrievaers.edInalam2o6st-wleicnekarclaypsatuldeosteoxsicuiptytostaubdoyutwi1t0h0Cpypnmo,maolltghuosugmhonskeeryusm,
`lgeevneelrsadtiiodnnroetpirnocdruecatsievelisntcuadrileysatinhriagths,ersedorsuemsa(nTdabllieve3r-c5)o.nceInnir1a4t-iwoeneskaldsioetianrcyraenasdetdwo-
aadpmpirnoixsitmearteedlydolsienewaralsy fwiotuhnddoisnebl(oToadblaen3d-5l)i.verI.naThruadsi,olparbiemlatsetuadnydtrhaetmsatjuodriietsyinodfitchaete that
serum PFOS concentrations resulting from directly proportional to cumulative dose up
daily exposure over a broad range of to serum concentrationsof100 ppm
PFOS doses (see section
are
43.12).
3.2 Effects on the Environment
3.2.1. Effects on Aquatic Animals from Exposure to Aqueous Concentrations Saqiunacteic19o7r4gannuimsemrsohuasveacbueteenancdoncdhurcotneidc (tToaxibcliety3-t6e)s.ts Ouvseinrgtahisvatriimeet,yopfrforteocsohlwsatfoerrcaonndduecsttiunargitnhee tPoFxiOcSittyoteasqtusathiacveorcghaannigsemds. hFaosrbeaegnivdeenmtoynpsetoraftteedsttoanbde wteisttheinndaporienlta,tihvoelwyevsemral,lthreanegfef.ecTtaobfle 36tesstuemnmdaproiiznetss tahree aavqauialtaibclteoixincciltuyditnesgttrheesuElCts10th,atECarSe0cuorrrEenLtSlyOaovraiLlaLbSle0. oAr LvCaSri0e,tyLofOeEffCeactndlevel `EsCu9m0m.ariNeos effofreectaclheoveflsth(eNtOesEtsCsahnodwNnOiEnLT)abalree3a-l6s.o aOvnagiloaibnleg.aAnpdppelnadninxedITacqounattaicintsoxtihceirtyobtuesstt results are presented in Appendix IV.
ExaminationofTable 3-6 shows calculated from a 47-day chronic
that test
the lowest of fathead
NOEC found was 0.3 minnow conducted in
mg/L 1999.
PFOS, which The value
is
ergepgrseasesntthsettheestPeFnOdpSoicnotn.cenItnrkaeteiponinagt wwihtihchthneoSeIfDfeSctapwparsoafcohunodfuussiinngg athpeosmto-shtatscehnssiutrivvieval of
indicator of PFOS aquatic species.
effect
as
the
PNEC,
this
report
uses
0.3
mg/L
in
the
risk
assessment
for
3.22 Effects PFOS
on
Terrestrial
and
Aquatic
Birds
and
Mammals
from
Bioaccumulation
of
tIonxsiictiutayteinodnspowihnetrseisspaenciafciccesppteecdiepsraecftfieccetsindaetcaolaorgeicnaolt raivsakilaasbslees,simnetnetr.-spTehceiemsaegxntirtapuodleatoifonthoef
ufnecweerrtasitnetpisesarienisnuvcohlveexdtrianpotlhaeteixotnrsaipsoluantkinonowpnro,caesnsd,ctohueldunbceerltaarignety(Cwihlalpbmeanlesest (al.S, am1p99l8e).et aIlf.,
e1x9t96r)a.polFaotrinPgFfOrSo,m omraamnmyaoltshetrocmhaemmimcaall,st(hce.gs.e urnactesrttoaimnitnieks)sahnodulldarbgeerswmahlelnerexwthreapnolating from
mpraemdimcatlinsgteoffbeicrtdssof(c.cg.h,emriatcsaltos coanglbeisr)d.s Aandpomteanmtimaalllyslcarogmeessoufrrcoemotfheunvcaerritaabiinlittyyaassssoocciiaatteeddwwiitthh
Lr --------
n
000021
sceonmsimtoivni,tyraelmaotinvgelyspceocniseisstteonttoxteisctcehnedmpiocianltss.fToorxhicuimtayndahteaalftohrrliasbkoraastsoersysmraetnstrtehpartesceanntbtehe most athpepliinecdretaosteedrreexsttrriaaplovlearttieobnrautnecse.rtaTihnetsieesemnednptoiinotnsedwialbloavles.o bUeseapoplfaiedtitsosbuircdonscpeenctireastisounbjoefct to PphFaOrSmacraotkhienretthiacnvaanrieaxblteesmatlhatdoesxiesetsbteimtawteeenresdpuecceisest.hiAs vuinacenrctahirnotnyicbysteuldiiemsinaarteinaglssooumnedoefrwtahey to better characterize the effectsofPFOS in birds.
TchhreonpirceleifmfiecntasryofrePsuFlOtsSofonthrraetes arnecdenmtonsktuedyise,s w(sheiecThaibnlcel3u-d5e)d emveaalsuuarteedmetnhtessuobfcPhrFoOnSic or concentrations in serum and liver. As explained above, these results provide the best available information for characterizing the potential effects and risks of PFOS to piscivorous wildlife.
Sraetcst.ioGnroCwotfhTaanbdlere3p-r5odpurecsteinotnsatrheetryepsiuclatlseondfapogirnotswtuhseadndinreepcrooldougicctailonrisstkuadsysceossnmdeuncttse,dawnidth ohfavteheatdaibrlceetshecoowlsogtihcaatltheeffNecOtsEcLororcecluartiroendaatttthheei0n.d4ivmigd/ukagl/adnddopsoipnuglaltevieoln. lNeovelt.oxEicxoalmoigniactaliloyn iprmep-oirmtpalnatnetfafteicotns loonsspiunpcrseuarsveivdaalnodr lgirttoerwtshizeo,ccpuurprevdiaabtiltihtiys, dgorsoew.thA,tan1.d6smugr/vikvga/lddaecnrdehaisgehde.r,
For the ecological risk characterization for piscivorous wildlife, the NOEL from the dam pre-
cmhaotiicen.g gFirrosut,ptwhaissvcahlouseeni.s taTkheins fvraloumeaisst4u7d.y1o-npprmepsreorduumctPiFonOSw.hicSehvhearsaldirreeacstopnospsuulpaptoirotntlheivsel
rdeelreivvaendcef.roSmeacdounldt,, ntohnepmraegmnmaanlt asneirmuamlsv.alTuheisrdf,roemnd3Mge'sstabtiioosnpvhaelrueepsraorgeraafmfeacrteedgebnyertahlely
physiologic changes occurring during pregnancy, introducing greater intra- and interspecies
vnaeroinaabitlailtys.eraInaraedddiitfifoinc,ultfettoalcvolalleucets, taennddtthoebreismkofroer cuonncteartmaiinnattihoann oardudlitluvtailounesd,urbiencgaucsoellection
`isnuhimgbheerr.wa(sNontoet: usTehderbeeciasuaseNOitEdoLeosfno6t2r9epprpesmenitnaSercetpiroonduBcotifveTaebflfeect3)-.5 Ffoorr ftehmeaelceolroatgsi.caTlhriissk
characterization for serum PFOS NOEL
piscivorous wildlife, the was used as the PNEC
0.4 mg/kg/day concentration.
dam
pre-mating
valueof
47.1-ppm
`Two recent studies were done to assess human health effects related PFOS toxicity to liver
dcioentcaernytrsattuidoynsw--ithherat2s.6-Iwneethkec2a6p-swuleeektomxiocnitkyesytustduydwy,itthheCymneoamnoNlgOuEsLmofonrkleiyvseracnodnctehnetr1at4i-ownese.k
omfeaPnFO(Smalatetahned0.f1e5mamlge/kavge/rdaagye)doNsOeEwLasfo8r0lpipvemr,co(nTcaebnltera3-t5i)o.nsFfoorrtPhFeO1S4-awtetehke r2a.t0sptupdmy,dtohsee
wPaNsEC72s.5foprpmth.is(iTsakblaess3e-s5)s.menEti.theTrhteheramtolnikveeryvallivueerwvaaslucehoorsetnhefroarttlhiivserrivsaklausesceosuslmdenbtebuesceadusaes
it results in the most conservative risk estimates. concentration was used as the PNEC.
Therefore, the 72.5-ppm liver PFOS
rat nia sso Report PFOS
000022
3.3 Initial Assessment for the Environment
Effects to the environment are calculated mammalian assessments. As indicated in
using a ratioof the PEC the SIDS manual a ratio
to PNEC for both aquatic ofgreater than one (>1)
and
iidnednitciaftieesdaasnpdectihfeicchheamziacradlmcaayn bbee cpoosnesdi.derAedrattoioprfeasrebnetlaowloownepo(t<e1nt)iianldfiocratreisska. hInaztahrisd cannot be
eaxspsleiscsitmleyntinaccotrupaolraetnevdirionntmheentPaNlEdCa'tsa aorreruisskedcatlocuelvaatliuoantse. rTishkeainndvesrasfeeotfytfhacetorrisskarreatnioo,tor
PNEC/PEC, is the marginofsafety.
`Ignraapdhdiictailonfotromca(lFciugluarteisng1,th2eaPnEdC3)./ PThNeECgrarapthiiocss, pthreoveifdfeectasmaentdhoedxpfoosruvriesduaaltlayacroemppraersienntgetdhien eefxfpeocstsuraendcoenxcepnotsruarteiodnast,a.thFatroarme tchoentgarianpehsd,inthteheracnugreroefntefdfateactssetcocnacnenbteraatsisoensss,edo.r rCaunmguelaotfive afsrseeqsusemnecnytsd,isatrnidbuptliootnssofotfheeffedcattsaaanrde eprxepsoesntuerde.arUenclriekaetetdhefoPrEbCot/hPthNeEaCquraattiicosawnhditcehrrefsotcruiaslornisk othfethheigphoetsetntpioaslsirbilske orfisPkFeOstSimaactreos,sstthheegernatpihriecarlanagpeprofoeafcfhecptrsovainddesexapcoosmuprreeihnefnosrimvaetiaosn.sessment
3.3.1 Risks to Aquatic Biota from Exposure to PFOS in Surface Waters
c`Toanbcleent3r-a7tiproensseanrtes atvhaeilraabtlieo.ofTPhEeCrattoioPsNraEnCgefforroeamc0h.o0f00th0e16ciattiePsorint wSth.icLuhcaiqeua(tSiitcee2x)ptoosu0r.e0096, faolrsothaet PquoirettSts.urLfuaccieew(aqtueiretsasumrpflaeceinwaDteecra)t.ur.TheAlslebcuotndonlearogfetshteratriaoti(o0s.i0s0l0e3s7s)thwaansodneetebrymianed mmaarrggiinnooffssaaffeettyyogfreoavteerr t1h0a0n. 20A00c.omTpahreiqsuoineotfawaltlertoaxticPoolrotgiStc.alLuecnidepoiisntthseteoxcteheptmioanx,iwmiuthma iPnFdiOcSatceosntcheanttrfaortitohne ocbutrareinnteldyaatveaailcahbloefwtahetesrixccoiltuiemsnisdasthaotwhne cinonFciegnutrreat3i-1o.noTfhPeFFOiSguirneall usnacmeprlteasinatrye(wbealsledbeolnowthitsheveerntyicroenrsaenrgveaotfiveecortioskxiacpoplroogaiccha)l, etfhfeecctusrrdeatnat.inWfiotrhmiantitohneibnoduicnadtsesofthat I1t0sahdovuelrdsbeeefrfeeccotgsntiozeadqutahtaitcabqiuoattaicwoeuxlpdosbuereasdsaotcaiisateldimwiittedh.measured concentrations of PFOS
3.3.2. Potential Risks to Terrestrial Wildlife from Bioaccumulation ofPFOS
tAlhlanPoEnCe/(PTNabElCesra3t-i8osanfodr3b-l9o,ordesapnedctilvievleyr)P. FOThSescoentcaebnltersatpiroonvsidien treartrieosstrfioarlcoarcghansipescmisesweurseinlgess atvhaeillaobwleesttiisssuseusacomnpcleenst.raTthieonl,artgheestmmaaxxiimmuummtirsastuieocfoonrcPenFtOraStiionnb,laonodd twhaesa0ve.r0a5g5e2offoarlblald bealgoloeds.coTnhciesntrrataitoiornesproefsePnFtOsSt.heNdoetgeretehoatfrtihsiks raftoirotrheepriensdeinvtidauamlaeraggilneofwsitahfetthye hoifgh18e.stTmheeahsiugrheedst Mmeeaann rPaEtiCo/isPaNlEsoCarsastoicosiawteerdewiletshscfaogrlaelsl (o0t.h0e0r7s3p)e,ciaensd. represents a marginofsafety of 137.
rat nin sss Report PROS
In
000023
PFiFgOuSrec3o-n2cecnotmrpaatiroensstfhoerPalNl EspCecfioersssearmupmlecdo.nceEnatcrhatviaolnuewiitnhtthheeccuummuullaattiivveeddiissttrriibbuuttiioonnoisftbhleood amneaalynsoifs.allExsaammipnlaetsiofnoorafptahrteicfuigluarresspheociwess.thLaatbtehlesmoenditahne PfiFgOurSe isnedriucmatceotnhceenstpreactiiesonusfoerdailln the Species is approximately 0.03 ug/ml. The 5" and 95 percentile PFOS serum concentrations are oapnplryo5xi%moaftetlhye .s0p0e4ciuegs/mm!eaanndP0F.O28Susge/rmlu,mrceosnpceecnttirvaeltyi.onsIneoxtcheeerdw0o.r6d4s,ugb/amsle.d Foingucurrer3e-n2t dsahtoa,ws that for the currently available environmental data the serum concentrations of PFOS in wildlife samples are well below the PNEC.
For PFO in liver, the largest maximum PEC/PNEC ratio was 0.0676 for the mink with the highest liver concentration. This ratio represents a margin of safety of 15. The largest mean aPpEpCr/oxPiNmEatCelrayti5o9.isFailgsuoreas3s-o3cicaotmepdawrietshtmhienPkNlEivCerf(o0r.l0i1v7e0r),cornecperntersaetnitoinnatgomtahregciunmouflastaifveety of dairseturisbeudtiionntohfe icvuemrulPaFtiOvSe cdoisntcreinbtutriaotni.onsExfaomrianllatsipeocnieosfstahempfliegdu.re Asghaoiwns,tshpaetctihees mmeedainanvaPluFeOsS cliovnecrenctornactenitornastairoenafpoprraolxlismpaetceileys 0is.0a2ppurgo/xgimaantde0l.y40u.g0/8g,ugr/egs.pecTthiveel5y*. anFdig9u5r"ep3e-r3ceinntdiilceates that for the currently available environmental data the liver concentrations of PFOS in wildlife samples are well below the PNEC.
Tmihnek.remFaoirneixnagmsppleec,ietshehasveecoPnEdCh/igPhNesEtCmraatxiiosmtuhmatsaerreummurcahtiosmiaslalsesroctihaatnedthwoisteohfheeargrilnegsgaulnld S(0e.r0u0m46c)o,nrceepnrtersaetnitoinnsgisa 1m0a,r0g0i0nofforsatfheetnyoorfthe2r1n7.fuTrhseeallaargnedstthmearstgeilnloarfscsaafleitoyn.foIrntlhievemra, xthiemum osfecsoanfedthyoigfhe7s3.t mTahxeilmaurgmesrtatmiaorigsianssoofcsiaafteetdywfiotrhthtehemraivxeirmotutmerl(i0v.e0r1c3o7n)c,enrterparteisoenntiisnsgeaenmairngin swordfish (5,000).
Sourcesof uncertainty in these risk characterizations include the following:
1. The relative sensitivities of rats, monkeys, and piscivorous wildlife species to PFOS are unknown; therefore, using rat and monkey laboratory PFOS toxicity data to predict cefofneccetnsttroatpiiosncoifvoProFuOsSwirladtlhiefretmhaanyaonveerx-teorrnaulnddeorseesteismtaitmeatreisrkse.ducUesseothfisatuinscseurteainty by eliminating some of the pharmacokinetic variables that exist between species.
2. The amountofchronic toxicity data for PFOS available at this time for predicting risks to piscivorous wildlife is limited
3. cTohnecednetgrraeteiotnoswihnibclhoothdealnidmiltievderdaintapiinsctihveorboiuosspwhielrdleisfeamaprleirnegprpersoegntraatmivfeorofPPFFOOSS. concentrations in piscivorous wildlife in general is unknown.
In summary, it can be concluded from currently available data that the observed levelsofPFOS
ofrrotmheaewnividreonvamreinett.yofPEsaCm/pPlNeEsCcarnantoiotsbaereasssuobcsitaatnteidawlliythleisdsentthiafniaobnlee a(<d1v)e.rsIet esfhfoeucltsd bien:wildlife
Dra itlsess Report PFOS
1s
000024
srteucdoigensizaerde,uansdienrdwiacyattehdatabwoivlle,intchrateausnecetrhteaainmtoyunextiosftsdiantathaisvaainlaalbylseisf.orAcdhdairtaicotnearlizaivnigarnisckhrtoonic. birds. Finalizing biosphere monitoring studies also will provide more information on the presenceof POS in the environment.
33.3 Other Effects
``Smtaannudfaarcdtiuzreidngwhploalnetelfofclauteendt itnoxDiecciatytutre,stAslraeqbuaimraedwuenrdeerretvhieewdeids.chaQrugaertpeerrlmyittesftorintghewith
Daphnia and fathead in the test organisms
minnows is required. exposed to the plant
For the effluent,
past two years, there has been which does contain PFOS.
100%
survival
Dra ntl sessReport PROS
1
000025
Table 3-1. Environmental Concentrations (PECs) for PFOS in Surface Water
PEC (ng PFOSIL) ppt
Location | Sampling Site
Si]te Average| 0L%ocHat0ioonn
Coumbus, |_ Stel |@8|so| oo |
Georgia [sea |766 | wa| ow |
singin | removes|
Stes |534 Quitsurface| <25
| |
ssa <25
|
ssa 25
|
water
53
Pensacola, Florida
["siez | 28s|28| a7|
sE earnmp cean[s suQui:eetsusrtice|| 01597 [|181s74 | 11766 |
ves
water
25
Vole, |sel | 230| 2| 8 |
aba [S | 96|i ws|z az|
[-- rerscioms
["Ouictsurface| 333 | 31S
24
rie
water
Decatur, Mabam-- a
[S |ws|i 2 |z wa |
eeervaroer s| QuieOt srurface
11 i
a
Cleveland, |_ste1 |147 | <25[199 | Tennessee
SEfimriinees
os
fcloopriindgaocsinsin [iebeaeat|
Sues
| 78| sa |
66
|
rFiSenTrons || QQuiSctsourrface| 2930 | 2850| 289%
Limit ofquantitation s 25 n/L and method detection int 1s 2.5 ng/L.
Ort ntl Assons 05
20%
w
000026
Table 3-2.
Environmental and Serum
Concentrations (PECs) Samples from Wildlife
of PFOS Species
in
Blood,
Plasma,
NSuamplmberof "
PEC(Luog PFOS/mL)
anodarT
CaspianSeal |14| 0012 | 0018 | 0013
erg G3 |ooos|oss|om| on |
No FurSear l] 4e| 00058" | 00058"| 0.0058"|00|
rw | 1 o[woow [ow[vo 0 |o-w|
Stellar SeaLion
0.00587 | 0008 | 00058 |00|
*Level of Quantification for the * The mean concentrations were
Specific Analysis calculated using all
data
points,
including
those
that
were
below the limit of quantification.
Dra itAssent ReportPEOS
i
000027
Table 3-3. Environmental Concentrations (PECs) of PFOS in Liver Samples from
`Wildlife Species
Rie
ee Somer
15[ows `Samples [om Joon on | Deviation
[[b aBwomwarreoenn o 1 [20T[oowoi owror_||oootmm [[[wos ooirare|||oosrocsos|]|
[GiCnaomaSsamatrion | 6 |ooom ||ooowm [aooast|[_oaoooesrs||
[Bsa --5 oow |owsos] 0 |
Gow
[on[os [on]-|
fo[ ore s ||ee 5T|oooe mmwe[|[ooovmwr r[[Jooooims||s ]ooooann|]
Me ow |ww [a]ii]
SoRs roosbcewor [| +o 1[voons||| oovowws s[[Jooomwss|||oo0xi]_]|
pedo + ots |ore [om[ow_|
fFraaam
3 | oooo [|oooz |Jooomns|| w0ow||
ET I NERSCE
000028
*"LTehveelmoefaQnucaonntciefnitcraattiioonnsfowretrheecSapleccuilfaitecdAunsailnygsialsl data points, including those that were below the limitofquantification.
Table 3-4. Envir`oSnammepnlteaslfCroonmcePnitsrciavtoiroonuss(WPiElCdlsi)feofSpPeFcOieSs in Other Tissue
Species
Tissue
Number
of Samples
PEC (ug PFOS/g) ppmStandard Deviation
on
Chinook
[sCaolmmoonran
0.0070
|| 3[wow |om[ow|onn_|
muscle,
0017 | 0024
0.0027
whole
body
Soro | on[2[o|mooe [ows| 0 |
*TLheveelmoefanQucaonntciefnitcraattiioonnsfowretrheecSapleccuilfaitcedAunsailnygsiasll data points, including those that were below the limitof quantification.
Dra iilAsssmes Report PFOS
0
000029
Table 3-5. PFOS Toxicity Data for Mammals: Observed Effects, Serum and Liver PFOS.
|
Concentrations, and Cumulative Observed
Dose Serum
PFOS|
Liver
PFOS|
Cumulative
Group!
|
Etteet
Concentration|Concentration| Dose
(ppm)
(ppm)
(mg/kg)
26-week Capsule-Dosing Study in Cynomolgus Monkeys
[omggd NOEL
| 8Ts 273)
hepatocyte enlargement
females
males
mee 0.75 mg/kg/d
Dfoerat2h/6omraelaersly sacrifice
14-Week Dietary Study in Sprague Dawley Rats
[Z5o0ppppmmFeMmalaelses [N[HOepFatLocellular | vacuolization
> 100, <137
eo] 386.a5s3
244)
20 ppm Males
== I |Hepatocellular
hypertrophy and vacuolization; decreased cholesterol; increased. AAT hypertrophy and vacuolization
599.94]
I
pares ow 0.4 mg/kg/d Dam |NOEL PM EG 04 mgkgd Dam [NOEL EG T6 mg/kg/d Dam |Slightbodyweight PM T6 mgkgd Fetus |Survival, body weight EG Dv ni ssnReportPFOS
arr] 7] 47.125.00 (n=
1638]
16)
05) 3ET0m= BE
3]
6) 1855140 (n=
GE)
16) | 117% 14.5 (a2) =
NA
2
0000350
Table 3-5. PFOS Toxicity Data for Mammals: Observed Effects, Serum and Liver PFOS
~ I
Concentrations, and Cumulative Dose
Observed
`Serum
PFOS
|
Liver PFOS |
Cumulative
[Grow
re
Concentration |Concentration| ~~ Dose |
(ppm)
(ppm)
(mg/kg)
arespr[e Fwes e [| e]nM EG
4
3P2M mg/kg/d Dam [Body weight
3166)8 23.6 (n=
134]
porepm [gee] [7 EG
6)
paren [per Jee] 1H EG
6)
+ PM = Pre-Mating, after 42 days of dosing; and EG = End of Gestation, day 21 ofgestation
Dv nilAsseRnotr POS
2
000031
Table 3-6. Aquatic Species Ecotoxicity Tests with a Survival Endpoint Using
PFOS
[BTo ow]|Dasppe
|emmAeowreac|n|Fsenen co-s ||
(199 | Doman | Aowe |_seneco=o_|
FBT 919o9 ||pFuavmeasmiamgimnoan|| Aomwee ||_o6zheincesc0s=-0o5r||
[Fm| vows | ene | sohics=30|
[(50119% || DFaobsmomamnon || S03 1996 | Fain|
oonwee ||oscehnnEosr=Ln<00|| Aww | seni0=50|
ffroor||DFaemiann[|AwAeewe || sseenincsci-en|]
[o0o17o | Fapeesattmiimonn|| Aemwee || vSeennicsoon||
[9_|Ftdmon| Chrome _|_sranorc=0|" [[5to7w||FVootwmmon|| GChnon ||_Spaaonroce=c0=51s|| =
* Bold indicates the value used in this risk assessment.
--
.
000032
Table 3-7. Aquatic Species PEC/PNEC Ratios for Six Locations
PECYPNEC Ratio
Loccaattiion [ser] Site
Site3 Quiiet Surface
Water
Pensa, FL_| 66x10"|86x10'| ooxio"|sexi]
Six | sr Cleveland, TN | 66x10| 83x10 |83x10 = |
Port St. LucieF,L |_1.6x10| 28x10 | 22x10 96x10
+ *
TSihtee vaavleureaguesePdECas, tihneuPniNtsEoCfinsg0.P3FOmSg/LP,FOpSrIeLse,ntbeadseidn oTanbslteud3y-1.reference no.
78
amseapsreusreendtevadluien.TaSbalfeet3-y6.facNtoortseatrheatnottheusvealduien0t.h3emcgalcPuFlaOtSi/onLoifs tahneactual
PEC/PNEC ratio.
Dr nidsss Repor POS
000033
Table 3-8. _Piscivorous Wildlife Species PEC/PNEC Ratios for Serum
pron
om Tv Ratio ]
[Mi |n Maxii mum| mu Menm|
f[ or Po oom r | ooooorrr i_|_| ooo omme_]| Sense Ton
* Minimum, maximum, and mean PECs (ug PFOS/mL) are presented in Table * The " St 5 the PNECfo serumis 47.1 megor ug.
Dv tilAssam Report PROS
x
000034
Table 39. Piscivorous Wildlife Species PEC/PNEC Ratios for Liver
--_
Ratio
[Rims [Moiwveimsum[|woMaoxismum| | oMoeann ||
[b Ganges oo | om wn | s soon | Csewhies--oo|o|o_oowom s|
Fruie--o--w--|o_o ooou 2_|
2) b)
Minimum, maximum The value used as the
and mean PNEC for
PEC's (ug PFOS/g) are presented liver is 72.5 ug/g (Table 3-5)
in
Table
3-1.
Dra itl sessmentReport PFOS
000035"
1T
EE soerrnBE e088+ +
won|
ee ra--fis-- che-- ri --
ls imi | a Fp
Cai oerae tee ricn l +
emt
[tio
I Ee FO] asreimna5e]
airneels +
Toros
foul |
-
Lo weeeen.
|
or i
----------+ parvo -
mon| |
ee
ee + FrmauninRcaonNE
| . I
la
+ SeseenrdeoeeG:o nEe + Fausrma t
|
Canantoniots
Figure 3-1. Cumulative frequency distribution of aquatic species ecotoxicity test results. [Note: Cumulative frequency of the ecotoxicity test results is calculated by first ordering the data from lowest to highest, while keeping track of the order
number. The order number is then divided by the total numberof observations and then converted to a percentage. The resulting cumulative frequency is a value that ranges from 0 to 100 percent.]
Pr --------
n
000036
--
|
+=
EE
|
i
-
3
. Coe
|
on
ha...
J
|
-|
* sowie.
~_
BN |
we enim
|
Figure 3-2. Cumulative frequency distribution of mean PFOS concentrations in
blood samples of piscivorous wildlife species. [Note: Cumulative frequency of the
exposure results is calculated by first ordering the data from lowest to highest, while
keeping
number
trackof the order
of observations
number.
and then
The order number is then divided by the total
converted to a percentage. The resulting
`cumulative frequency is a value that ranges from 0 to 100 percent.|
tt sme tn 5
o
000037
Ton] i
[a
3: A Co
|
|
ae SO
ie
- se
ro E
-
samme
ae
ros comment
= I
-
-
. 7]
1
Figure 3-3. Cumulative frequency distribution of mean PFOS concentrations in
liver samples of piscivorous wildlife species. [Note: Cumulative frequency of the
exposure results is calculated by first ordering the data from lowest to highest, while
keeping track of the order number. `The order number is then divided by the total
number of observations
cumulative frequency is a
and then
value that
converted to
ranges from 0
a percentage.
to 100 percent]
The resulting
Ort et sme pa 70S
000038 *
4.0 HUMAN HEALTH
4.1 Introduction
This section contains a summary ofthe available data relating to the potential for PFOS to induce
adverse effects in humans. The available data consist ofa large body of epidemiological,
animal, and other types
response data now exist
ofexperimental
relating serum
data,
levels
reported over the pas
to adverse outcomes
t
i
25 years. Substantial dose-
n experimental animals,
including primates. Included are repeat-dose studies, two-generation reproduction-development
studies, teratology studies, and genotoxicity studies. Still in progress, and not reported here, are
2c0h0r0o.nicTahneimmaajlosrtiutdyioefsc;irteastuilotsnsfrinomthtihseSseecltioonng-atreermfrboimoasstsuadyiseswialnldbreepaovratislafbrloemby3Mthespeonndosofred
work, the detailsofwhich are found in Robust Summaries. These Robust `Summaries are
contained in Appendix V ofthis SIAR. The authors ofthis section wish to acknowledge the
effort of U.S. EPA scientists in preparing many initial Robust Summary drafts that werefurther
developed and edited by the SIAR authors.
The principle focus of allofthis work is PFOS. The toxicity testing program includes two.
rmeeltahtyeldpceorfmlpuoournodosc,taNn-eetshuyllfpoenrafmliudooreotohcatnaonle
sulfonamidoethanol
(N-MeFOSE). The
(N-EtFOSE) and N-
structuresof these chemicals
are
shown below. Both are components ofcommercial products, and both are known to beabsorbed
and undergo metabolism to yield PFOS.
N-Methylperfluorooctane sulfonamidoethanol
N-Ethylperfluorooctane sulfonamidoethanol
FC,
FiC
"ory-cer,r crN,orpcrN,edbweeYoonnm \or-oFo,rc,NerpcrN, e4dndoYconhn,poH, Bothof these compounds have been subjected to repeat dose toxicity and genotoxicity testing,
and the ethyl derivative has also been evaluated in teratology and two-generation reproduction
sPtFuOdSie.s. TAhisswsiulglgbeestsseetnh,atbothteh tcooximcpiotiuensdosf pPrFoOdSucpereefcfuercstosrvmeorlyesciumlielsarmtaoythboeseduperotdouPcFedObSy
accumulation as opposed to the precursor molecules themselves, or to anyofthe intermediary
`metabolites leading
evaluationof PFOS
to PFOS. This
serum levels in
conclusion
relation to
can not
toxicity
be
is
verified until a careful quantitative
completed. Thus, for the present, the
data on the N-ethyl and N-MeFOSE alcohol derivatives is presented for completeness, and
`because they confirm, at least qualitatively, the PFOS results.
Ort it Assenpaot POS
000039 5
42 Human Exposure
4.2.1 Background TorhgeandiactafolunorPiFneOiSn lheuvmelasninsehruummawnasseorbusmesravmepdl3e0sayreearpsreagsoe.ntTehdeinadthviasnsceectmieonn.tofTahnealpyrteisceanlce of tcehcehmniisqtureyshdaesvhealdopaedsigannidfiucsaentd ibnyflrueesnecaercohnerksnionwtlheedg19e6o0f'sflaunodro1c9a7r0bosnwseirnehutimmae-ninsterean.sivTeh,e r"eoqrugiarniincg fhlouuorrsifneorcoamspionuglnedasn"al(yasniys.coTmhpeomuentdhohdasviwnegrfelugoernienrealcloyvanloennstpleycibfoinc,demdeatsoucrairnbgon) rdaetchreeratsheadnasnpaelcyitfiicctmiomleecfuolretso.talTohregadneivcelfloupomreinnetotofuanrdaepridananhaoluyrt,icaltleocwhinnigqulearigne-tshceallaetmee1d9i7ca0l' sourrgvaeniilclafnlcueoorfinper)otdhuacttwieorneeamdpelqouyaeteesfoart thhieghleervedlestefcotuinodnilnimoictcsup(aatbioounta0l.l5ypeaxrptsospeedr imnidlilviiodnuals. T1h9e90asd,varanpciedmaennatloysfischorfosmpaetcoigfircapfhliuco/rmocahsesmsipceacltsrforsocmopsymatlelchvnoolluogmyesenoafbsleerda,. bTyhithseteeacrhlnyology was first used in medical surveillance in 1993. Detection limits for PFOS in serum were lowered 10 50 parts per billion by 1997. "iiTnhihsusmeacntisoenrap;re2s)endtas:ta 1f)raobmri3eMf seummpmlaoyreyesoftinhveolhvisetdoriincaflluionrfoocrhmeamtiicoanlrpergoadrudcitnigono;rgaanndic3)flduaotriane: from various sources of humansera that may represent non-occupational exposures. Historical Finding of the Organic Form of Fluorine in Blood Traadvieosac(t1i9v6e8fal)uodreisncer-i1b8edantdwoonfeorthmastowfaflsunoorti.nePointhsaeprruamg,aodnaeetthaalt. w(1a9s71e)xcahlasnogdeeasbclreibweidthtwo ftooramlsb,umiionn.ic Tahnidsnfoinnidoinnigc,. alToanvgeswi(t1h96re8sbu)ltsshoofweexdtrtahcattiotnheannodnp-reexccihpiatnagteiaobnlaendfltuhoerinneeewdasforbound nasohniinognitco frleuloeraisneetwhiassf"oorrmgaonficf"l,uoirci.ne,colveadletnottlhyebcoounncdlutsoiocnartbhoatn t(hTeanvoens-eetxaclh.a1n9g7e6)a.bleUsoirng NpeMrfRluosrpoeoccttraonsociocpya,citdhe(sPeFaOuAt)h.orsThteenrteatwiaveslysoidmeentviafriieadtiaocnoimnptohneeonbtseorfvtehde sopregcatnriacffrlouomrainne as apurtehseenntciecosafampsluelfoofnaPteF,OwAa,shpoowsesivbelre,. leSaudbisnegqtuheentauetfhfoorrtsstboysu3gMgesrtestehaartchberrasncihdienngti,foiredtbhoeth PFOS and PFOA in blood. ASenrumufrmoomfbpsrteeusduirmesabolvyernotnh-eopcacsutpa2t5ioyneaalrlsyreepxoprotseeddlpeeverlssoonfs.orTgaabnliec4f-l1uoprrienseenitnshtuhmeasntubdlyood auustehdorf,orledveetlermmeiansautrieodn,ofpofpluuloartiinoenssusgtguedsitesdtahnatdsmoemtehocdasutoifonanbaelyusisse.d Tinheinvtaerriperteytionfg mreestulhtos.dsAll reported means were in the tens-of-parts per billion levels. The average of reported values from United States sources is 0.038 ppm.
Def ni sssmen Repo PFOS
2
000040
Table 4-1. Historical Findingsof Serum Organic Fluorine Levels in the General
FoPopVunelartiT|onowAuthor |[OoFoGenm|| Nes__[|AMwethoaTM|usSourse ||
[[919%% [BGeulyi.slTeaves [i979 [Singer
|| 00002250 || 1906_[OAbsohmb | 0085 |28 [Am
[U[UsS [Us
| |
[{7r9o8w0 [|hPeaels [os Belise
[0000s85||Foo4led|[AMsohdObomb[|AgUenSa || |_a0ri |_ [Obomb [Chim |
1989|Vamamom | 00% | 11__[LOPA Japan |
* Organic fluorine, specific identities not provided. +x Varied methods were used to measure organic fluorine.
See papers for details.
4.2.2 Occupational Exposures
3M manufactures
`metabolize, to an
uPnOdSeFt,eramisntaerdtidneggrmeaet,ertioalPFfoOrSo.thEemrpfllouyoreoecshemmaiycables
that may
exposed
then degrade or
by one or more
routes (i.., inhalation, skin
manufacturing environment
contact/absorption, or ingestion)
. The primary route of exposure
to flu
varies
orochem
among
icals in the
employees
and
dhyegpieenndes, opnersseovnearlalhafbaicttsoras,ndingcelnuedrianlgwporrockepsrsacctoincdeis.tioEnxsp,ojsoubretaesskts,imwaotrioknlhoacsatbioene,npeexrcseoendailngly
difficult when multiple sourcesofexposure are probable. Biological monitoring data (e.g.,
salelreuxmpolseuverles)somuarcyesa.ddrBeisolsotghiicsaplrmoobnlietmoraisnigt daaltlaowasrefoerspaenciianltlerynraellmeveaanstuwrheemreentthaesyseresfslmeecnttdofsre:om
to the target organ (e.g. liver). This is likely to be the situation for PFOS as it has been observed
in cynomolgus primates that the liver to serum ratio is approximately 1:1 up to serum levels
approaching 100 ppm (see section 4.3.1).
"UTSaAbl)e,4A-n2tpwreerspe,nt(sBPelFgOiSums),eraunmd vSaalguaemsiohbatraainJeadpafnro[mRSp6la,ntRSeSm,plRoSy9]e.esTihneDeDceactautrur(AalnadbAamnat,werp
plants are involved in fluorochemical production, whereas the Sagamihara facility handles, but
dsourevseinloltapncreodoufcper,osduulcftoinoanteedmppelrofyleueosrobcehegmaincailnst.heAllattheo1u9g7h0'vso,lruonuttairnye`sbpieecnniifailc
medical
measurement
of
serum PFOS levels did not commence until the mid-1990's. [Note: Prior to this time.period,
total organic fluorine was measured. Fluorine is 65%ofthe molecular weight of PFOS. The
contri
PFOS
butionof PFOS
was measured
to
in
o
5
rganic fluorine, in
Decatur employee
pseprma,swaimlplltehserienfo1r9e79bebu0t.6a5naxly(tPicFaOlStevcahlnuiequinesppwemr)e..
100 time consuming and required too large a volume of serum for routine medical surveillance.]
es--------" 000011 * A voluntary medical surveillance program may not lend itself to an adequate characterization of
tchoensdiesqtureinbucteioofnroefsepmopnldoeynete(if.luoSreolcehcetmioinc)albisase.ruBmecleavueslesifthpearetxitceinptaotfitohnirsatpeosteanrteiallobwiaass
a
was
unknown for the fluorochemical medical surveillance programs at the Decatur and Antwerp
e`mmapnluofyaecetusraitngthpelaDnetcs,ataurcr(osAsl-asbeactmiao)namlansutfuadcytwuarsindgessiitgen(eRdSGi)n.19T9h8etpourraponsdeoomflythseamsptuldey was to dVeotluenrtmairnyemwehdeitchaelrstuhrevediilsltarinbcuetpiornogorfaemmsplwoayseaerseearsuomnafbllueorreofclheecmtiiocnaolftlehveelsploabnsteprovpeudlaitniotnh.e A atontdalnoofn-2r3e2spDoencdaetnutrse(mnp=lo4y6e)eswewreerceormapnadroambllye swaimtphlreeds;pe1c8t6to(8ag0e%,)gpeanrdtiecripaantdede.mpRleospyomnednetnts adunrdat6i0onf.roOmftthhee frialnmdpolmalnty (swahmeprleedflpuaorrtoiccihpeamtiicnaglesmwpelroeyeneost,ma1n2u6fwacetruerefdr,omaltthheocuhgehmiincaolneplant aprnoadluyczteidoancrcuonrdainfglutoorotcheheemmipclaolyieseosc'cadseimoongarlalpyhuiscesd,).cuBrrleonotdorlelvoenlgseosft-thheeldfljuoobr,oacnhedmtihceals were llionceaatriofnasshoifojnowbsitwhityheianrsthweorckheemdicinalthpelacnth,emSiecarlumplPanFtO(S* l=ev0e.l1s1)w.erNeowpeoaskiltyivaesassoscoicaitaetdioinn awas observed between frequencyof self-reported hand-to-mouth usage or hand cleanliness and serum PFOS levels.
Dra nil Assen Report PFOS
000042
`Table 4-2. PFOS Serum Concentrations: Occupational Populations
1007 3 50)" Tres
onan |
1999 Production 1 = 1999 Management (n= 32)
0.04
Voluntary study. Estimated participation rates < 50%of employees who routinely or
periodically worked in the chemical plant.
* Random sample cross-sectional study.
Voluntary cross-sectional study.
The distribution
previously repor
of serum
ted from
PFOS levels
the voluntary
measured in this random sample was similar
medical surveillance examinations. Thus, it
to
wa
that
s unlikely
that employee serum PFOS levels higher than existed in these fluorochemical manufacturing
that observed populations.
in the medical surveillance programs Results from this random sample
assessment are currently being used in
retrospective cohort mortality studyof
the
the
constructionof an
Decatur employee
exposure matrix
population (see
for the
Section
updated
4.4.3).
`These biological monitoring data were also used in the ongoing analysis of health claims
comparison analysis between chemical and film plant employees from 1993-1998 (see Section
4.4.3).
There are many industrial uses of fluorochemical-containing compounds, and it is likely that
PFOS could be found in serum samples from workers in these various user industries. 3M production employees are exposed to concentrated PFOS precursors whereas downstream
wstoarrkteirngsmaarteergieanlesrailnlpyoelxypmoesredprtooduPcFtsO.SThpirsecsruugsgoersstsindcoownncsetntrreaatmiownoosrfkelresssshtohualnd 1h%avaeslroewseidrual serum levelsof PFOS than those observed in 3M production employees. The Sagamihara sampling data is consistent with this viewpoint.
4.2.3 Non-occupational Exposures
In in
1998, three questions were addressedtodelineate the extent the blood of membersofthe general population not exposed
to which PFOS occupationally
might be present to precursor
`molecules:
cmimrrinsien . 1)
1s PFOS detectable in
population known ot
hu
to
man blood samples
have worked in 3M
ffrloumoraoccohrepmoircaatlem-abnausfeadc3tuMrienmgpolroyuesee
plants?
2) IsPFOS detectable in pooled blood samples from the general population and from
000043
3) dIisfPfeFrOenSt dgeetoegcrtaapbhliecainl hliosctaotriiocanls ahcurmoassntbhleoUondistaemdpSlteastecsolalnedctoeudtspirdioertthoetUhneitientdrSotdautcetsi?on of POSF-based chemicals into the marketplace?
sTuomamdadrriezssedthien Tfiarsbtltew4o-3.of PquFeOstSiocnosulsdevbeeradlestteucdtieedsiwnetrhee csoenrduumcotfeaddaunltdsthien dtahteaUnfirtoemdtShteamteasre m(lR)S2(7R,S3R1$)2.9,PRF$O3S0)coaunldd caolusoldbebededteetcetcetdedininthcehisledrreunmoufsaindgulatvseirnyBsemlagliluamm,otuhnetNoefthseerrluanmds(0,.1 aGsesromcaiantyi,onSswbeedtewneeanndPFJaOpSanan(dRSd2e7m,ogRrSa2p9h,icRSs2(8)..8.,Nagoe,inafnedregnecnedsecr)o,ultdimbeetdreevnedlsoapnedd sroeugracer(dsi)n.g
Dre ia sss Repos PFOS
6
000034
Table 4-3. PFOS Serum Concentrations: Non-Occupational Populations (1998-1999)
Tokyo (Japan): Head Office (n= 30) CInotmemregrenci(apoloLlaedb:oraaptporroixes5TM00 donors) Sigma (pooled: approx 200 donors) 35 Lots Commercial Labs US Blood Banks (n = 18 pooled samples)" European Blood Banks (pooled samples)
Belgium (n= 5) Netherlands (n = 6) Germany (n = 6) `Sweden (n = 30 individuals)
28 individuals 11 individuals
0.044 0.033 0.035 0.030
0017 0.053 0.037 <0032 (LLOQ) 0048
003-0097 | 0.043 0.044 0.026 - 0.045 0.005-0.085 0.009- 0.056
0005-0.022 0039-0061 0,032:0.046
0.032-0.085
D6osnamoprlepsooplerinbflooromdatbiaonnk,,sutcoh 1a0s adgoen,orssepx,eorfsgaemopglrea.phGiecoaglrlaopchaitciaonl,lynodtisatvraiibluatbleed.acr3ostso
the continental US and Alaska. Nota statistically valid sample of the US population
(RS29). pooled
samples,
10
donors
per
sample
in
Belgium
and
the
Netherlands;
30
donors
per
sample in Germany (RS28).
RST "Pilot analysis.
Limited serum (0.1 ml) from children aged 6 or 12 who were enrolled in
a group A streptococcal study. Study is in progress. RS31
TPoFOadSdrceosusldthbeetdheitrdecetxepdloinrastaomrpylqeusesotbitoani,nheidsptorriiocraltostahmeplmeasnuwfearcetuorbetoafinperdetcourlseoarrncwohmeptohuenrds (Ut.hSe. lmaitlei1t9a4r0y'rse)c.ruPitFsoOfSthweasKnoorteadentWecatrederian t(e1n94p8o-o1l9e5d1)s.amApnlaelsy(s1i0sodfon1o0rsSwpeedrissahmpslaem)plfersom csoalmlpelcetsedtianke1n9d5u8rriensgulttheedcionndaurcatngoefosfevvaerlaulepsofstr-o1m9n6o9ne-pdiedteecmtio1l0o2gipcpabl.stAudliiemsictoedndnuucmtbeedrinofthe UidneintteifdieSdt.ateAsnawleyrseisanoaflsyezreudmansdamspelreusmfProFmOStwloevCehlisnreasnegirnurgalfrpormovnionnc-edset(eLcintxtioan5,9 Sphpabndcoounlgd) be that were collected in 1984 and 1994 showed no detectable PFOS.
Iitntarpopdeuacrtsiofnroofm PthFiOsS-lipmrietceudrssaomrpmloilnegctuhlaetsP;FthOeScopnrcelsuesnicoeninishhuimghalnysuenrceurmtacioninbceicdaeussweiotfhththee sparseness of the database. Definitive statements regarding time trends cannot be made at this time.
Dr iAssertRor FOS
000015 n
4.2.4 Forthcoming Studies Several additional studies to address human exposure are being sponsored. These include the following: 1) CArnosasnailnysoirsdoefr t5o0o0btianidinviadcuraols,scsoenctteiomnpaolraarnaylyadsuilsotfbsleoordumsaPmpFlOeSs lfervoemlsthien aAdmuelrtsicbaynaRgee,d 2) `Agnenadnearlaynsdisionfauppptroox5iUm.aSt.egleyog2r5a0phiincdaivlidloucaaltieolndse;rly adult samples (ages 65 - 99) from an 3) Aonngoanianlgyssitsuodfy6of0c0ogcnhiitlidrveen'fsunscatmipolneasm(oagnegst2he- e1l2d)erflryomin2t3hestSaetaetstlweh, oWawsehriengentroonllaerdeai;na 4) `AgrcooumppAarsitsroenptoofcolcicvaelr tcolisniecraulmriPalFOinStrhaetimoisd-f1r9o9m0'3s0;human organ donors; and 5) MAartiymleantdrenind 1a9na7l4ysainsdof19f8l9uofrorcohmetmhiecaslasm,ein5c9luidnidnigviPdFuaOlSs,asinwseelrlaatsha1t2w0edriefcfoelrelnetctienddiivniduals
in the two time periods (ages 20-60+). All of these research efforts are scheduled for completion by the first quarterof 2001 42.5 Indirect Exposure via the Environment `Human exposure via the environment is discussed as partofsection 3.1.1.
4.3 Effects on Human Health 43.1 ModeofAction, Toxicokinetics, Metabolism
43.1.1 Mode of Action Tsthuedimeescahraenciusrrmesntgloyveurnndienrgintvheestbiigoaltoigoinc.alSreevseproanlsessttuodPiFpOrSoviedxepocsluurees toobstehrevpeodteinntitaolximcooldoegsicoafl Ntoaxbicbietfy.eldCo1m9p8e8t)i,tcihoonlewsittehroflatstyyntahceisdissf(orHacuargrhearmpraontdei@nysbtienidni,ng19si9t2e)s a(Nnadbbbieofeenledrgeettailc1s9(9W8a,llace parnodliSftearraktoivo,n (1S9o9h8l)enhiauvsecbteael.n, s1t9u9d3i,edT.keIdnaaedtdialt.i,o1n9P87F).OSNhoascobnecelnusreipoonrsthedavteo bienednucreepacehreodxiosnome the importanceofanyof these possible mechanisms toxicity at this time.
Dra ntl AssesmentReportPROS
=
000046
43.1.2 Toxicokinetics and Metabolism Tsthuediaebdsomropsttioenx,tteinsssiuveeldiystirnirbauttsiobny, bpoottehntriaadliomleatbealboalnidsmdiraencdt eqxucanrteittiaotnioofn.PDOatSa hrealvaetibnegeonral droecsoevteoryseirs uamvaailnadblleivferrocmondciernetcrtaqtuiaonntsiotaftiPoFnO.S Ininadtdhieticoynn,osmeorlugmusPFmOoSnkceoyncdeunrtirnagtidoonssiinngraentidred 3M chemical workers have been followed in an attempt to estimate an elimination rate constant for the human.
Absorption
wPeFrOeSgiisvewnelalsaibnsgolerboerdalfdroosmetohfe4d.i2gemsgti/vkegs[ys"tCeJmP.FAOSrdadeimoolnasbterlastteuddythiant w>h9i5ch%aodfultthmeadloeseratwsas absorbed in the first 24 hours (RS60).
aDpeprlmiaeld aubnsdoerrpotcicolnousfioPnFtOoSapapprpoexairmsattoelbye4p0os%sioblfetbhuetbiosdlyimsituerdf.aceInaroenaeosftmuadyl,ePaFnOdSfewmaasle New
`ZoebatlaainneddWohnitdeayrsab1b,i7t,s a1t4,5a,0n0d028m.g/kAgnaalnydsilsefftoirntpotlaalceblfooord24flhuoourirdse(wRaSs54p)e.rfBolromoedd soanmdpalyesonweere
and day 28 `male were
samples from a single male and single 10.3 ppm for day one and 130 ppm for
female. day 28.
Total serum fluoride values for the The respective values for the female
wdoesree,0i.t 9isplpimmitaenddi1n2t8haptptmh.e vAalltuehsoufgrhomthoisnlsytutdwyoianndiicmaatlesdwseormeemdeearsmuarleda,bsaonrdptoinolnyaftraomhitghhe day
one and day 28 samples (O'Malley and Ebbens, 1981).
NDuoequtaontthietaetxicveeptiinofnoarlmlaytiloonwisvaapvaoirlpabrleessounrethoefaPbFsOoSrp,tiionhnaolfatPiFonOeSxpforsoumreinwhoalualtdiobneeuxnploiskuerley.. If it does occur it would be associated with aerosols or particulates containing PFOS.
Distribution
pPoFtOenStidailsltyrsiebuvteersalprteidmoemsihniagnhtelrytthoanthseebrluomodcoanncednltirvaetri,ownist,hdelipveenrdcionngceonntrsapteicoiness
being and dose.
A
r[a"dCioJlPaFbeOlSsdteumdoynisntrwahtiecdhtahdautltthmeaclaerbraotns-w1e4rien gliivveernaandsipnlglaesmiantrreapvreensoeunstsdo2s5eaondf34.%2omfg/tkhge
d3o0s.e2,%roefsptehcetitvoetlayl,caafrtebron8-91d4ayvsi.a uDruirnienagntdhteh8e9m-edaaynpcousmtu-ldaotsievpeerfieocadl, etxhcerreattisoenxwcareste1d2.a6%m.eaAntof
8we9rdea:ysl,ivmeer,a2n0.t6i;sspuleacsomnac,en2t.r2;atkiiodnnoefy,to1t.a1l;claurnbg,on1-.11;4 sepxlpereens,s0e.d5;asanpdgb[oCnIePmFarOrSowe,qu0i.v5a.leLnotsw/egr
concentrations (<0.5) were measured in adrenals, skin, testes, muscle, fat and eye. No
radioactivity (<0.05) was detected in brain. (RS57).
Scihgonliefsitcyarnatmeinnteer(ofhoeuprapteirccecinrtcbulyatwieoingohft PinOdiSeth)atsrebaetemnenrtepoofrrtaetds agsiveevnidseinncgeled ibnytrtahveefnaocutstdhaotses Of PFOS increased fecal elimination 9.5 times over control (RSS8).
"The volumeofdistribution in male and female cynomolgus monkeys on daily dosing has been
Dra ntl sessmentReportPOS
000047 "
mesgt/ikmga/tdeadya)sd0e.m2onLs/tkrga(tReSd3a4)l.inMeaorn(k-esyqsuadroesded> b0y.9o9r)alinccarpesausleeiwnistehrPuFm OcSonc(e0.n0t2raatnidon2t.h0roughout
tthhee ceuxmpuolsautrievpeerPiFoOdS(2d8odsaeysv)e.rsuTshesreeruwmasPFnoOSapcpoanrceennttsreatxidoinffceurrevnecseaapnpdeatrheedintdoibveidvuiarltusallolpyes of
`idmegn/tkigc/aldafyorgrthoeupmo(nnk=e6y)swiansth5e.2t2w+o 0d.o7s4e pgrpomupsP.FOTSheinasveerraugmepselropmego/fktghecucmuurlvaetiivnetdhoes0e..0T2he
two monkeys in the 2.0 serum per mgkg PFOS
mcgu/muklga/tdiavyeddoossee.grAotupthheaednadnofavtehreag2e8-sdlaoypedoosfing5.4p0e+ri0o.d6,1speprummPFOS
in
Tcohnecseentdraattaisoungignestthea0v.o02luamnedof2.d0ismtgr/ikbgu/tidoanyogfr0o.u2psL/wkegrefoarpcpornotxiinmuaotueslydo3sipnpgmovaenrd a30t0woppormd.er
of magnitude range.
cIonnace2n6t-rwaetieokn cwaiptshulceu-mduolsaitnigvestduodsyeiwn acsynoobmsoelrvgeuds (mRoSn3k2e)y.s,Aat stihmeillaorwpearttdeorsneso,f0i.n0c3reaansdin0g.1s5erum p`mpgm/kgat/dtahye,esnedroufmthleevedlossiinncgrpeearsieodd,inrefsaiprelcytilvienleya.r fAatshtihoen0a.n7d5 rmega/ckhge/ddmoesae,nstohefi1n8crpeapsme ianndse8r5um aPcFcOuSmualpapteiaorneodftPoFsOatSuraitnet,hreesaecrhuimnoagf mmaelaenoafnd21f5empaplemmboyntkheeyesnadopfpetahreeddsoismiinlgarpeirnioaldl. dToshee `groups. Figure 4.1 shows the trend in group mean serum concentrations during the dosing period.
Dr nid Assn Ror POS
000048
Figure 4-1. Mean serum PFOS concentrations for males and females
during 182 days of oral dosing at either 0.03, 0.15 or 0.75 mg/kg/day.
350
300
E
gam
@Q a0
.
o
gE
3
i
10
2 50
ad a 503a
0
50
_ -
{}
-
-
;
5a
ao
100
Time (Days)
E -
803
[ll
150
|oM0.03 mg/kg/d
| AMO0.15mghkgid| oF 0.03 molkgld
oF 0.15 mg/kg/d
| AMO75 mgkgid | oF 0.75 mg/kgid 200
Male and female CR:CD rats continuously exposed to PFOS in the diet for 14 weeks (RS39) also showed a linear relationship between dose and serum concentration as is shown by the data in Table 4-4.
Dra ilAssent Report PROS
000049
Table 4-4. Serum concentrations in male and female rats after 14-weeksof exposure to PFOS in the diet.
--_-- Males Estimated Cumulative Dose
Dose GroupTM
0.5 ppm
20 ppm
(0.036 mgke) (0.1 mgkg)
5.0 ppm 20 ppm. (035 mgkg) (1.37 mgke)
32
126
311
233
(mSge/rkugm)PFOS
22pm T79ppm T 456 pm pm T T3 ppm m
coa ncentration (8.5 1M) (59uM) Dose(OGLrAoWuMp") (3046 iM)
Females
0.5 ppm 0.04 mg/kg)
20 ppm (0.16 mg)
5.0 ppm 20 ppm (041 mg/kg)' (1.6 mg/kg)
Estimated
36
14.6
370
144.0
Cumulative Dose
(mg/kg) Serum PFOS
6.7 ppm 269ppm 629 ppm 216 ppm
coosncentration
33M)S(o 39pM) l (12601M) l (4329 uM)
"Dietary concentration * Estimated dose based
of on
PFOS in ppm feed analysis,
(ng PFOS/E dict) feed consumption
and
body
weight
during
study
D4i-s5tprriebsuetnitosn sacerrousms tchoencpelnatcreanttiaonasndfreoxmpoaspuhraeromfactohekifneettuiscinstuutdeyrochoansdubceteendddeumroinnsgtrparteegdn.anTcayble (orRaSl52g)a.vaDgeamfosr w4e2rdeatyrseaptreidorwtiothmavteihnigcl,edounrliyng(mcoanttironlg),an0.d1,du0r.4i,ng1.g6esotrat3i.o2n.mgS/ekrgu/mdawyasPFobOtSaibnyed ffertoalm ldiattmerss oprniogresttoamtiaotnindgayan21d. onThgeesptratei-omnatdianygsa7n,d1g4easntadti21o.n dSaeyr2u1mvwaalsueosbtaraeinreedprfersoemntpeodoilned the Table 4-5
Dra ntlssRs eportPFOS
a
000050
Table 4-5. Maternal and fetal PFOS serum and liver PFOS concentrations associated with gestation (rats).
Dose Group| Media Mgkgd"
or
Seum | 103126(16) | 4912123(7) 1051.01 (7)
Liver
-
23.443.76 (8)
9.17 1.08 (7)
Serum |47.1500(16) |30317.0(6) 39.75.(950)
Liver
-
107252 (7) 42.519.4(6)
6
Serum |185% 14.0(16) 15886.6 (4) 1751452)
Liver
-
440 316 (5)
100+ 30.6 (2)
32
Serum | 36723.6 (16) 180 415 (6) 1912264(6)
2)
Dams
were
Liver
treated daily
by
oral
-
gavage
for
42
598+ 83.9
days prior (o
(6)
mating,
265 +70 (6)
during mating and
through gestation.
b) After 42 days dosing
t`Thhee1a4p-pwaereenktdliaectkaoryfcsoturdryesapnodntdheencreepirnodtuhcetrieolnatsitoundsyhimpaoyfdboeseexptolasienreudmbyletvheel wfahcetnthcatomtphearing reproduction study was a gavage study, as opposed to the 14-week dietary study. In the latter wsteuidgyh,tmdgu/rkigngdtohseecloeuvreslesowfetrheeessttuidmya.teFdebeadsecdonosnumfpeetdioannailsysains,erfreoerd-cproonnseummpetasiuorneamnedntb,oddyue to the possibiltyof spilled (unconsumed) feed. Dietary doses also represent a continuous source of exposure as opposed to pulse dosing by gavage. Serum levels at the endoflactation after exposure in the PFOS reproduction study are represented in Table 4-6. Table 4-6. Comparison of serum PFOS levels at the end of lactation after dosing rats with PFOS for 42 days pre-mating, during mating, gestation and through lactation (approximately 13 weeks).
5352035
There is conclusive evidence from the cross-fostering study that PFOS distributes to milk and also crosses the placenta. These data are discussed in Section 4.3.4.
refnittsssmenRepo FOS
000051
Metabolism
PFOS is not known to undergo further metabolism or to form conjugates. Preliminary data from aSnuaglgyessitsotfhautriPnFeO,Sfeicsensoatnmdettaisbsouleiszoefdra(tJsohansswoenlletaasl,th1e98i4n)h.ereAnntalstyasbiislibtyyofLpCer/fMlSuoofrisnearteudmaannidons liver samples from recent studies has not revealed any evidence of metabolism
CmeerttaabionlcihsemmitocaPlFsOmSa.deFofrreoxmapmeprlfel,uoNr-oEocttFaOneSsEulcfaonnyblefmleutoarbidoeli(zPeOdStFo)PmFaOyS.unIdnerognoe astduedgy,reienof which rats were administered "C-N-EtFOSE in feed, at least 28%of the radioactivity found in the liver at 48 hours was PFOS (RSG). This represented 4.4% of the administered dose.
Excretion
Single intravenous doses (mean 4.2 mg/kg) of ["CJPFOS in 0.9% NaCl were administered to
male rats the urine
(RSS7). By 89 and 12.6% had
days been
after dosing, 30.2%of the administered "C had been excreted in the feces. Whole body elimination in the
excreted male rat
in
laipfpeeoafre"dCotofb7e.5bidpahayssicf.ollInoiwtiianlgrseidnigslteriobruatlioandmfirnoimsttrhaetipolnaosfma["yiCeIlPdFedOSa p(lmaesamnadeolismeina4.2timogn/khagl)f-
dtoosmealtehrroautgsh(RuSr6i0ne).anIdnftehceesafaoftreerme8n9tdiaoynsedinidnitcraatveesntohuaststthuedyh,alef-lliimfienoafteiloinmoifnoantlioyn42f.r8om%tohfe the
body is > 89 days in the male rat.
Cynomolgous monkeys have been followed for one year in recovery after six monthsofdaily loriamlitdeods(itnwgobpyecraspesxulpeeratd0os1e5gorro0u.p7),5tmhge/vkagl/udeasysu(gRgSe3s2t).meWahnilseertuhme neluimmbienratsioofn ahnalifm-allisveasroef a1r8e9ldiakeylsyfnoor ttrhueemdiidf-fdeorsenecersecionvseeryrugmroPuFpOaSndel1i7m5indaatyiosnfroarttehsebheitgwhe-ednosteheremciodv-edroysgeraounpd.hiTghhe-re dose groups. A low-dose recovery group was not part of the study design.
cFehcoallesatnydratmotianlee(x~cr2e.t7igo/nkogf/d)**iCnwteheriermdaiertkefdolllyowiinncrgesaisnegdleinimntarlaevernatosusaddmoisneisstoefre[dCIPFOS
e(nJtoehrnoshoenpaatnidc Gciirbcsuolna,ti1on9o8f4 aPnFdOSR.SS8C)h.olTeshteryersaumlitnsesaudgmgiensitsttehratedthaetr4e %wabsyswiegniigfhitcainntfeed to
male rats decreased the retentionof carbon-14 in liver, plasma, and red blood cells and increased
tdhoeseedliimnitnraatvieonnooufslcyarwbiotnh-P14FOvSia-"feCce(smaefatenrdiovsed,os3i.n4gmwgi/tkhg)P.FORSa-t"s"Cw.erGersoaucprisfiocfedfiavte2r1atdsawyesre
peoxsctredtoisoen.ofTh"eCmfeoranchloilveesr,typrlaamsimnae,-tarnedatreeddrbaltsoowderceellcocmonpcaernetdrattoiomneaasnwceolnltraoslfreactalvaalnudesu.riMnearayn
cbhlooloedstceylrlasmi(0n.e3-tirge/aet)edrerpatre"sCentcoancdeenctrreaatsieonfsroimn lmievearn(c9o.n4turgo/lg)r,atplcoanscmeant(r0a.t9iuogn/smlo)f,3a.8n,d7r.e7d, and
6.0 9.5
fold, fold.
rTehspeecetxitveenlyt.ofuFreicanlareyli"mCinaetliimoinn(at7i5o.n9,%aswiatrhecsuhlotleosfttyhrearmeilnaetitvreelaythmeingth)rwataesoifnfcerceaalsed
elimination of "C was lower in cholestyramine-treated rats. The extentoftotal elimination of
HC (urine plus feces) was higher in the cholestyramine-treated rats.
Dr tidsss Report FOS
"
000052
Human Data
Serum PFOS levels in three retired male 3M chemical workers followed for five and one-half years suggested a mean serum climination half-life of 1,428 days. A recent initial analysis of 27 3M fluorochemical production workers retirees" sera, collected three timesover a 12-month period, has suggested that the serum elimination half-life of PFOS in the human may be much lower, approximately 300 days [RS53]. The rangeofthe initial serum PFOS levels in these retirees was from 0.2 to 4.6 ppm. These retirees have their serum collected and analyzed every six months. More definitive serum PFOS half-life estimates are expected within the next year upon collectionoftwo more samples.
Summary The data provide no evidence for PFOS metabolism in any species. PFOS is readily absorbed after oral exposure but absorption by the dermal route is low. There is evidence that absorbed PFOS is bound to protein and distributed primarily in blood and liver. PFOS undergoes entrohepatic recirculation. There is slow whole body elimination in both sexes. At lower and moderate doses, body-burden is proportional to cumulative dose. In rat studies it is clear that PFOS can traverse the placenta and expose the fetus in utero. PFOS is also distributed in to the milkof lactating females.
43.2 Acute Toxicity Studies Numerous reportsofacute studiesofPFOS have been performed. Data from an inhalation study in rats, two oral studies of rats, one dermal studyofrabbits and one dermal and eye irritation studyofrabbits are noted below.
Inhalation Exposure
tInhae psottuadsysitoumdestaletromifnPeFtOheSmaesddiuasnt lientahiarl tcoonScpernatgrautei-oDna(wlLeCy),ratRsuastclheveetlasl.of(119.7899)t0ad4m5i.n9i7stmegr/eld PFOS. An LCy of 5.2 mg/l was estimated from this study (RS2).
The rats in all groups showed signsof toxicity including emaciation, red material around the nose or other nasal discharge, yellow material around the anogenital region, dry rales or other breathing disturbances, and general poor condition. Abnormal in-life observations were reported to be less frequent in the lower exposure groups.
ADtisnceoclorroaptsiyo,notfhethmoestlucngomwmasonalasbonoobrsmearlvietdy iwnacsondtirsoclolroarattaionndotfhetrheefolriveemr aayndnloutngb.e treatment related. The most significant treatment related abnormality was discolorationof the liver. Among animals that died prematurely, decreased body weight, discolorationof the lung, and discoloration and distention of the small intestine were also observed.
oral
`The studyofDean et al 1978 determined an acute oral LD, and 95% confidence limits of
Dre tnscsi Report PFOS
-
000053
251 (199-318) mg/kg. The study report by Gabriel 1978, tested only two doses and determined the acute oral LD, was greater than 50 mg/kg and less than 1500 mg/kg (RS3).
Dermal Exposure
Nfeomasliegnailfibciannotrtaobxbiictistywewraesdoobsseedrvdeedrmianlaly19u7n9depreroccucltuasnieoonuswiatbhsoSr0p0ti0omngs/tkudgyPiFnOwShifcohr m2a4lheouarnsd and observed for 28-days post-dose (RS54)
4.3.3 Repeated Dose Toxicity
4.33.1 PROS
PstFuOdySihnarshbeesuesn mstoundkieeydsin(9R0S-3d5a,yRsSu3b6c)h,roannidcidnieat2ar6y-wsteuedkieosrailn(rcaatsps(uRlSe3)7s)t,udiny ain9c0ydnaoymoglagvuagse monkeys (RS32). A two-year chronic feeding study in ratsis currently in final stages of completion (RS39)
Tchhreonsitcudsiteusdiynirnherastussamnodntkheey2s6a-nwdeetkhes9tu0d-ydaiyn rcaytnsotmuodlygwuesrmeornekpoerytsedweinre19a7l8s.o dTehseigmnoerdetorecent ppraotvtiedmeofsetrouximcdaetfaf.ectTshoebscaerrlvieerdsitnutdiheossearsetusduimesmairs iszimeidlairntToatbhlaet 4s-c7e,nainndtihtecmaonrbeersecceenntthsattudtihees. Tdohseeoslhdeorwsetdudcioenssiisntcelnucdyeodfmtouxcihcheifgfheectrsd.osIensthoenfbooltlhowriantgs,atnhdeprreicmeanttess.tudAireesaasreofdeosvcerrilbaepdoinn detail
IrnectehieverdecPenOt S26-bwyeceakpscuylneoamtodlogsoeussosft0u,dy0,.0g3r,o0u.p1s5,ofansidx0m.o75nkmegy/skogf/edaaych(RsSe3x2)(.4/sTewx oatalnoiwmadlosse) pweerresefxolflroowmedthfeorcoanttrloela,st05.215waenedks0.f7o5llmogw/ikngg/tdhaeylgasrtouadpmsiwniesrteraatsisoingnoefdPtFoOaS.recAotvetrhye gernoduopfatnhde dosing period, high-dose females showed reduced body weights compared to controls, but the differences were no longer obvious by the endofthe recovery period.
Tdiweod amfatleresdofsrionmg tohne D0.a7y5 1m5g5/k(gW/edeaky 2g3r).ouCplidniidcnalotsisgunrsvinvoetetod tihnetshicsheadnuilmeadl sianccrilfuidcee.d cOonnestraincitmeadl
pupils, pale gums, few, mucoid, liquid and black-colored feces, low food consumption,
hypoactivity, labored respiration, dehydration, and recumbent position. In addition, the animal
wdeatsercomlidnetdo ttohebetopucuhl.moAnnareynlnaercgreodsilsivweirtwhassevdeerteecatceudtebyinpfallapmamtaitoino.nC.auOsneodfayde1a7t9h, wthaessecond
male was sacrificed in a consumption, excessive
moribund salivation,
condition. Clinical signs noted included low labored respiration, hypoactivity and ataxia.
food Cause
of
death
`was not determined.
Mfeamlaelsesanidn tfheema0l.e1s5 ianndth0e.07.575mgm/gk/gk/gd/adyaygrdoouspes-garpopueparheaddtloohwaevretoltoawlecrhohliegshtedreonlsiatnydlmiapolpersotaenidn cdhaoylses1t5e3roalnddur1i8n2g, tarnedatnmoenptr.esHtDudLy cvhaollueesstearroelavvaaliuleasb,lehofworevceormp,awreisroeno.nlTyhedeetfefrecmtinoendtootnalstudy crhfolensitaersoslswnaesnrReevpoerrtsFeOdSwithin 5 weeks of recovery and high density lipoprotein cholesterol a"
000054
increased within 9 weeksofrecovery. Trilodothyronine values were lower in males in the 0.75 `mg/kg/day dose group on day 182. However, total thyroxine and thyroid stimulating hormone levels were normal and thyroid gland showed normal histology. Perhaps related to the observed decrease in cholesterol at the 0.75 mg/kg dose was a progressive decrease in estradiol in males. At terminal sacrifice, females in the 0.75 mg/kg/day dose-group had increased absolute liver weight, liver-to-body weight percentages, and liver-to-brain weight ratios. In males, liver-to body weight percentages were increased in the high-dose group compared to the controls. "Mottled" livers were observed in two high-dose males and in one high-dose female. Ofthe two males not surviving until the scheduled terminal sacrifice, one had a "mottled" and large liver. Three of 4 high-dose males (including those that did not survive to scheduled sacrifice) had centrilobular or diffuse hepatocellular hypertrophy which was also observed in all high-dose females. Centrilobular or diffuse hepatocellular vacuolation occurred in 2 of4 females and 2 of4 males in the high-dose group. No PFOS related lesions were observed either macroscopically or microscopically at recovery sacrifice indicating that the effects seen at terminal sacrifice were reversible, The LOAEL for this study is 0.75 mg/kg/day based upon death, liver effects, and effects on cholesterol. The NOAEL is 0.15 mg/kg/day. All effects appeared to be reversible. Interim results at weeks 14 and 53 are available from the ongoing chronic rat study (RS39). That sPtFuOdySiantv0o,lv0e.5s,g2r.o0u,p5s.o0f,6a0ndo2r0.700 pCprml.:CTDhr(oSuDg)h IwGeSekBR53,rahtisogfhedaocseh fseemxafleedsdsihetoswceodntraeidnuicnegd body weight gain and reduced food consumption. Reduced serum cholesterol and increased serum alanine aminotransferase (males only) was seen in high-dose animals. Mildly increased urea nitrogen was seen in animals fed 5 or 20 ppm, and serum glucose was reduced in high dose males and females, and in males at 2 and 5 ppm at week 53. At the 53-week sacrifice, high-dose rats showed increased absolute (males only) and relative liver weight. Centrilobular hepatocyte hypertrophy and midzonal to centrilobular vacuolation was increased in incidence in males at 20 ppm, and high-dose females showed an increased incidenceof centrilobular hepatocyte hypertrophy and pigment. Data on serum PFOS levels are available from the 26-week cynomolgus monkey study and for week 14 of the chronic rat study. The relationships between PFOS serum levels and toxic responses for these two studies are presented in Table 4-8. The serum levels presented in Table 4-8 represent preliminary analyses availableasof July, 2000. These values wil change in the final analytical reports based on adjustments for purityof the samples and other possible: corrections.
----
a
000055
Species
Table. SummaryCloifnRiecpaleaOtb-sDerovsaetSitoundsi;esClfionricPaFlOPSa.thology; Gross Pathology;
g2
Study 0-Day Dictary
|
(Strain) Rat
|
Dose units) Opp)
|[SM/n_S| F
Histopathology (M = Male F = Female) [w Noam
~g
() 30
(Goldenthat et al. 19788)
10
SM/SE SM/SF
[nL Sbloutdaymawtee-oxialgaTcpheltattsem,tarangslaumtianmsaet,elipvyerrudviastceoltorraantsiaomninase, Tplasma [3deaths; sensittioevxtietmayl stimuli,redmataerounrdthieeayeslor
a`mlokuathl,in4efopohdoscphatoase,nT bsloodpulgalusmcmoascer,peaTtbitlnoiondeipuhroesoaphonkina,se,
cnoiutnrtog(eFn),, helmeougkloocybtien,counhte,maitvoecrreitn,laregreytmhnr,onceycterocsoiusn&, reticulocyte
eu
SMSF | 1 Dheepaat;oceelmlaucliaartihoynp,erctornovpuhlys,iosntso,msatcohmdacih smuccoosallho&yprhereakmeotrraitrohsoaigsne, bone. `marrow hypoceluiariy, thymic follicular atrophy, splenic lymphoid
sTomlallcuilnatresattirnoepsh,ys,ketlreotpalhymoufscmleeseantterric&olydpmeprhhmaynlodaecsa,ntahotsirs,oopfhilyiin
1000
SM/SF | hDyepaetrhk;ehruantocshiesdposture
Tek Tar
3000 opm)
SM/SF |e Death;hyposcivity OMII0F | Noell
Dietary
(DSapwrlaegyu)e
| 05 [2
(Part ofongoing
5
1100MM//1100FF ||= NNooeeffffecctt 10M/10F |= Hepatocellular hypatrophylandvacuolizaton in M at 5 pom
P27sotudny, i
2
10M/10F [a li4vbeordcyweeig1lhptla,lmscihtoo,lyelstCeorAolo(xMi)d,asTleiavcetirviwteyight,enlarged & vacuolated
Dot mr 105
re
St
So say |aesmue || AowTteane. Su|_|mmaryiotfoRpmaeotpoogsyDnots=slitocirPniOFSFaennos Gros abs | | Monkey [10 (Goldenthal et Si Ciaraone 0 eSyi.doconssdois, vnecr, sn, cogs, ene 100 Ceoianbi doarbs.vorse san. mb om 3
SoG [RT [INTE [7 Nemailemnacmeesduees. rone pton cnge rhe Monkey 05
(Goldenthal et
15
+ Di eeyatTaw tio sily oocytd df,rtrceoslcyosnl1 & a. 1978)
id
2M/2F
2IM/2F
|w Deathwithin 11 - 20 days; 4bodyweight, markedweakness,anorexia,
L activity, emesis, diarrhea, tremors,prostration,congestion, hemorrhage | Deathwithin 7 - 10 days; body weight, marked weakness, anorexia,
2M/2F | Deathwithin 3 - 5days; +bodyweight, markedweakness,anorexia,
2MI2F |y Deathwithin 2 - 4days; 4body weight, markedweakness, anorexia,
2M/2F |w No Adverse Effect; Sl&iintg ermih ttentt activityin 3of 4animals
2M/2F | 4 Blo&moucdusin tools, diarhea, dehydration,tremors, J body weight,
2MI2F
4cholesterol, mar4kacteividty
dehydration, rigidity, convulsions, prostration, 4 serum cholesterol,
alkaline phosphatase, T SGOT
erm
000057
WeSctkudy Capsule (Thomford 2000)
Species Table dT. Summary`oCflinRiecpaleaOtb-sDerovsaetSitoundsi;eCslfionricPaFlOPSathology; Gross Pathology;
|Cy(nSotrmaoilng)y||0(Dmogsek(gudniatys))||6M76wnF _| |H=istNoopcaltlhooeltogy (M = Males F = Female)
shonkey | 003
SM/AF [a Noeffet
015
6M/6F |a Noadverseeffect
07s
GM/GF |w 2deaths; bodyweight, foodconsumption,black & mucoidstools,
activity, dehydration, labored respiration, cholestrol, L HDL
cholesterol, riodathyronine (normalT4 &TSHest)radi,ol liver
discoloration, 1liverweight, vacuolatedlivercells
Ort mee105.
|
|
000058 0
|
Table 4.8 PFOS Toxicity Data for Mammals:
Key Observed Effects, Serum and Liver PFOS Concentrations, and Cumulative Dose
Group'
Shaerct
Serum PFOS Liver PFOS. |Cumulative
(ppm) . Concentration Concentratio (ppm)
Dose
(mg/kg)
[OGmgigd [NOEL
8 |3 [ sa |
enlargement
females
0.75 mgkg/d 0.75 mg/kg/d
males
Decreased T3 (normal T4| > 152+30 | 415 (average) 7.7
[F ome erese ]IZT EI0 [ldl leImo17] Death or carly sacrifice for| > 150, <300| 415 (average)| > 100, <137
14-Week InterimofChronic Dietary Study in Sprague DawleyRats (Covance 1999a)
ee [[0250ppppmmFMeamlaelses[[NNOOEELL 5.0 ppm Males | Hepatocellular vacuolization
|| 616755 || 7isss ||_~=137 ||
386.53
244
20 ppm Males Hepatocellular
134
hypertrophy and
vacuolization; decreased
cholesterol; increased
AAT
hvyapceurotlraotpihoynand
|
599.94
106
{
|
Orot tnietssmse:RpeaprPFEOOS SApepec
000059 *
433.2 N-EtFOSE N-E(FOSE has been studied in ninety-day studies in rats (RS49) and rhesus monkeys (RS50). A two-year chronic toxicity study was completed in 1987. That study used a "wide range" material that included many short-chain fluorochemicals and was not representative of the typical material currently used in commercial products, A robust summaryofthis study is included (RS33). Subsequently, a two-year chronic study in rats using a more representative "narrow-range" product was initiated and is currently in progress (RSS1). The patteroftoxic effects seen in these studies is similar to those seen with PFOS. The primary target is the liver, with doserelated increases in liver weight and macroscopic and microscopic liver lesions in rats. In the 90-day rat study, N-EtFOSE was fed in the diet at levelsof0, 30, 100, 300, 1,000, 3,000 and 10,000 ppm to groupsoffive Charles River CD ratsofeach sex (RS49). All rats at the 1,000-, 3,000- and 10,000-ppm dosage levels died between days 9 and 29 of the study. Findings in high dose animalswere consistent with those found in animals exposed to high doses Of PFOS. These included compound-related gross and microscopic liver lesions with consistent changes in biochemical parameters. N-EFOSE was administered to groupsof two male and two female rhesus monkeys by gavage at dosage levels of 1, 3, 10 or 30 mg/kg/day (RS50). A control group received the vehicle, propylene glycol. On and after the second dayof study, all the monkeys, including the control `group showed anorexia, slight to marked decrease in activity and ataxia. The ataxia disappeared from all the monkeys directly after the amountof propylene glycol used was reduced from 5 to 2 ml/kgon study day 3. Most of the monkeys, including those in the control group lost body weight carly in the study. At 12 weeksofstudy all the monkeys were at or near the original body weight except for the groups receiving 10 and 30 mg/kg/day. At the endof the study the differences in the mean body weights of the treated and control groups were not statistically significant. Microscopically, the adrenals from one male and two female rhesus monkeys at the 30 mg/kg/day dosage level had compound-related slight to severe lipid depletion, and the pancreas from the two female monkeys at the 30 mg/kg/day dosage level had compound-related moderate atrophyof exocrine cells. No liver lesions were seen, however. In the ongoing two-year bioassay using a test material that is more representative ofmost material currently used in commercial products, groupsof60 or 70 Crl:CD(SD)IGS BR rats of cach sex were fed diets containing 0, 1, 3 30, 100, and 300 ppm N-E(FOSE (RS51). Due to excessive toxicity (reduced body weight, reduced food consumption) the 300 ppm group was terminated at about week 8 and the 1 ppm and additional concurrent control group were added. Atsacrifice, the 300 ppm animals showed hematologic changes (reduced red blood cell count, hematocrit, and hemoglobin), clinical chemistry changes (lower glucose, globulin, and cholesterol, and higher BUN, albumin, total bilirubin (males only) aspartate aminotransferase (males only) and alanine aminotransferase), liver enlargement, and hepatocellular hypertrophy and necrosis, and hemorrhage in the liver. A similar (though less severe) pattemofeffects was seen at the 30 and100 ppm groups at interim sacrifices at later measurement times. This pattern included: reduced body weight gain over the first 53 weeks; mildly decreased red blood cell count, hemoglobin, and hematocrit for females in the 100 ppm dose group; mildly lower glucose and mildly higher urea nitrogen for
Tr --
El
000050
animals given 100 ppm (predominantly at Weeks 14 and 27; moderately higher albumin and moderately lower globulin (predominantly at Weeks 27 and 53) in 100 ppm males. Hepatocellular hypertrophy and vacuolation were observed in 100 ppm animals at week 53, and hepatocellular hypertrophy was also seen at week 14 in males given 30. Decreases in body weight and total serum cholesterol were prominent effects in this study. Male body weights for the 30 ppm and 100 ppm dose groups were significantly lower than control values through week 53ofthe study. Females also experienced lower body weights. In the 3 ppm dose group females, transient but significantly lower body weights occurred on weeks 14, 15 and 16. Females in the 30 ppm dose group also had significantly lower body weights through week 29 and again on week 37 and weeks 43-53. The 100 ppm dose group females had significantly reduced body weight through week 53.
Cholesterol was significantly lower in males in the 3 ppm, 30 ppm and 100 ppm dose groups at week 14. This effect was present at weeks 27 and 53 in males in the 30 and 100 ppm dose `groups. In contrast, females in the 30 and 100 ppm dose groups had significantly lower cholesterol only on week 14.
433.3 N-MeFOSE
N-MeFOSE has been studied in a 13-Week dietary study in Crl:CD (SD) IGS BR rats at doses 0f3, 30, and 100 ppm (20/sex/dose) (RS38). The only effect seen at 3 ppm was a slightly reduced body weight gain. Effects seen at 30 ppm were: lower serum globulin, cholesterol and triglycerides in males; lower terminal body weight in males; increased liver-to-body weight ratio in males and females; increased absolute liver weight in females; increased incidenceofcentrilobular hepatocellular hypertrophy in males and females, and a slight increase in minimal hepatocellular vacuolation in males. At 100 ppm, the same effects as at 30 ppm were seen (but at higher incidence andor greater severity), plus lower serum cholesterol and triglycerides in females; lower hematocrit and higher BUN in both sexes; higher serum albumin in males; higher serum AAT in males increases in all liver weight parameters in both sexes (relative and absolute); liver coagulative necrosis, hepatocellular pigment, and erosion of small portionsof stomach mucosa in both sexes (RS38).
433.4 Summary PFOS, N-E(FOSE, and N-MeFOSE produce similar toxic effects in subchronic studies in rats and monkeys. The effects occurring at the lowest doses are liver cell hypertrophy, in some cases with vacuolation, a decline in weight gain, and areduction in serum cholesterol levels. The most recent data, summarized in Table 4-9, provides dose-response information on these effects. The fact that the three compounds produce similar effects suggests that these effects may be due to the presenceofPFOS and not the precursor compounds. This suggestive evidence can not be confirmed until all of the serum data have been collected and evaluated. Results from the chronic studies of PFOS and N-EtFOSE will become available in the future.
CL --
5
000061
Table 4-9 Comparative Effects Among Three Perfluorooctanesulfonyl Fluoride-Based Chemicals
Effect
Dose at which effect occurs ater 14 weeksof dietary
compound administration in rats.
Hepatocellular enlargement Cholesterol lowering Body weight
[elonnerimgiese | 00popmoonnets | pom fms 20ppmm ootnees Liver to Body,
|3N0 EppWmOmaSlesE, " [ 3N0-pMpemFmaOleSs,E' | S pPpmRmOalSes |
100 ppm females _| 100 ppm females _| 20 ppm females
3 ppm males
30 ppm males 20 ppm males
30 ppm females | 100 ppm females | -- ND females*
30 ppm males
30 ppm males 20 ppm males
100ppm males 30 ppm males 20 ppm males
* ND, not detected. * N-Ethyl-perfluorooctanesulfonamido ethanol * N-Methyl-perfluorooctanesulfonamido ethanol Perfluorooctane sulfonate Slight but statistically significant effect occurring only at the terminal weighing
4.3.4 Reproductive and Developmental Toxicity Developmental toxicity studies in rats and rabbits and 2-generation studies in rats for PFOS and N-EFOSE were reviewed. The N-EWFOSE studies are included for comparative purposes since, as noted above (Section 4.3.1) tis believed to be readily metabolized to PFOS. In addition, the results ofa PFO cross-fostering study are presented and discussed. All studies employed the oral (gavage) route for administering the chemicals.
Developmental Studies
Separate studies with PFOS and N-EFOSE assessed the effectsofpregnant rat exposure on prenatal developmentoftheir embryos and fetuses. Each chemical caused maternal and fetal toxicity and in the case of N-E{FOSE, a low litter incidenceofanatomical malformations were seen at very high doses. Initial studies with both chemicals reported a lesion in the lensof the eye in all treated groups (RS41, R45). The causal association between this effect and chemical exposure. was subsequently retracted by the study director when it was established that the "lesion was an artifact associated with the method of free hand sectioning used in the fetal examination. These lesions were not observed in repeat studies in this laboratory. Additional prenatal developmental toxicity studies with PFOS and N-E(FOSE have been performed in the rat and rabbit. Key aspectsofall studies are summarized in Tables 4-10 and 4-11.
CS
--
se
000052
Table 4-10.
Oral (gavage) PROS Developmental Toxicity Studies
Design
NOAEL LOAELTM Effects Reference
Rat SD
Mat. 5
Mat. 10, Mat Body RS45
Group size: 22 Dev.10
Dev.None weight.
Dose:* 0,1,5,10
Rat SD
Mat. 1
Mat. 5
Mat. Body wt. RS46
Groupsize:25 Dev.|
Dev.$
Clinical signs,
Dose:* 0,1, 5,10
gi. lesions.
Dev. Body wt,
vise. anom.,
skel. var.
Rabbit NZW
Mat. 0.1
Mat. 1
Mat. Body wt. RS44
Group size: 22 Dev. |
Dev.25 Abortions
Dose:*0,0.1, 1,25,
Dev. Bodywt.
375
Delayed
ossification
* (mg/kg). Rats dosed on GD 6-15. Rabbits dosed on GD 7-20.
Results from the PFOS studies were similar. Matemal toxicity and developmental toxicity was consistently seen and expressed as reductions in matemal weight gain or fetal body weight Reductions in food consumption commonly paralleled the effect on maternal weight. Fetal effects were primarily associated with maturational delays, e.g., Skeletal variations and delayed ossification. Abortions were observed in rabbits at a dose of 2.5 mg/kg and higher. The lowest developmental toxicity NOAEL for rat and rabbit are the same, | mg/kg body weight. The matemal toxicity NOAEL was 0.1 and 1.0 mg/kg for rabbit and rat, respectively.
--
ss
000063
Table 4-11.
Oral (gavage) N-EFOSE Developmental Toxicity Studies
Design
NOAELY LOAEL*
Effects
Rat SD
Matemal 25 Matemal 37.5 Mat, Body wt, deaths
Group size: 22 Develop.25 Develop. 37.5 at75
Dose:* 0,25,37.5,75
Dev. Body wi, cleft
palate, stemebrac
mal.
Rat SD
Matemal S ~~ Matemal 10
Group size: 25 Develop. 5 Develop. 10
Dose:* 0,1,5, 10,20
Mat. Body wt. Dev. Body wi, delayed ossification
Reference RS4T RS42
Rabbit NZW Maternal 5 Matemal 15 Mat. Body wt.
RSSS
Group size: 18 Develop.5 ~~ Develop.15 Dev. Fetal &
Dose:*0,1,5.15
Neonatal
Viability, resorptions.
Rabbit NZW Matemal 0.1 Matemal | Mat Body wt.
RS40
Groupsize:22 Develop. 1 ~~ Develop.25 abortions
Dose:* 0,0.1, 1,25,
Dev.Late resorptions.
375
* (mg/kg). Rats dosed on GD 6-15. Rabbits dosed on GD 6-18 or 7-20.
`The more recent rat study with N-E{FOSE (RS42) showed maternal and developmental toxicity expressed as effects on body weight, this is similar to thatofthe earlier study (RS41). Concordance is not good between the 2 rat studies as to the NOAEL or LOAEL doses. Morphological defects in fetuses were seen only at doses of 37.5 mg/kg and higher. The results of the rabbit studies (RS40, RSS) are similar as to the nature of the effects but there are: differences as to doses that caused matemal toxicity. Fetal survival during the 24 hour incubation period was significantly lower at the 15 mg/kg dose (RSS5). The rabbit and the rat study conducted at similar and slightly higher dose levels indicate that the primary early maternal effect is associated with depressed body weight. The lowest NOAELs occurred in the rabbit study; 0.1 and 1.0 mg/kg for matemal and developmental endpoints, respectively.
`When resultsof the PFOS and N-EFOSE developmental studies are compared, the type of effects, and doses that cause those effects, are similar. Fetal toxicity, as conirasted to anatomical malformations, characterizes the principal effectofboth PFOS and N-E(FOSE. Matemal toxicity also occurs at doses associated with developmental toxicity. Rabbits exposed to N-EtFOSE have a tendency to abort liters or resorb fetuses. These effects are possibly causally linked to the maternal effect. This typeofresponse was not prominent in rats exposed to cither PFOS or NEtFOSE.
ref ttlAssen Reon FOS ppenic
56
000064
Two-Generation Studies
Reproductive parameters generally were not affected by PFOS exposure in either generation of either sex in a 2-generation study in the rat (RS47). The exception was adecrease in implantations and liter size in F, females at 3.2 mg/kg, the highest dose tested. The carly adverse response in adults and in pups is reduced body weight gain in both sexes. Most significant was the death of all F, pups in the perinatal period at the matemal doseof 3.2 mg/kg bw/day. Mortality was also seen in F, pups from dams that received 1.6 mg/kg. The dose-response for this 9ef8f.e3c,t6i6s.1staeenpda0s.d0e%mofnosrttrhaet0e,d0b.1y,v0i.a4b,il1i.t6yainnddi3c.e2s m(sgu/rkvigvadlosfer,ormesbpierctthivteolyL.DS4e)veorfi9t8y.o7f,e9f8f.e3c,t on F, pups in the lactation phaseof the study resulted in post weaning dose groups being reduced to 0,0.1'and 0.4 mg/kg. These 3 dose groups proceeded through amating, pregnancy and postnatal evaluation phase until F, pups were 21 days of age. The F, rats in all these groups developed normally as measured by an array of developmental milestones, including neurobehavioral performance. Effects on reproduction, lactation and on postnatal viabilityofthe F; pups were modest and transient. The NOAELS from the study and the effect(s) seen at the next higher dose are:
F, generation - 0.1 mg/kg; at the 0.4 mg/kg dose effects on body weight gain size - 1.6 mg/kg; for reproductive effects at 3.2 mg/kg reduced implantions and litter F, generation -- 0.4 mg/kg; at the 1.6 mg/kg dose pup mortality and decreased body weight
- 0.4 mg/kg for reproductive effects, the highest dose tested F generation -- 0.4 mg/kg, the highest dose tested
`The N-EFOSE 2-generation study (RS43) wasof a design similar to the PFOS study and gceonnedruacttieodn iinn tthhee sNa-mEetFlaObSorEatsotruyd.yAcodmesmiegnncdeidff2er8edncaeyswaprsiotrhattodcooshianbgiotfatitohneofpatrhenetaslex(eFs,)as contrasted to 42 days in the PFOS study. The doses were 0, 1,5, 10, 15 mg/kg/day. There was a decrease in F, litter size and pup viability in the 10 and 15 mg/kg dose groups during the perinatal period. The dose-responsefor this effect was steep as seen in viability indices (survival from birth to LD 4)of92.8, 99.1, 92.0, 30.2 and 1.20% for the 0, 1,5, 10 and 15 mg/kg dose, respectively. The last 2 pups in the high dose group died on LD 5 and an additional 6 of 60 pups alive onLD 4 in the 10 mg/kg group died between LD and 14. Due to the severe effects seen in F, pups at the two higher doses, post weaning portionsof the study were reduced to 0, 1, and 5 mg/kg groups These dose groups proceeded through a mating, pregnancy and postnatal evaluation phase until F, pups were 21 days ofage. F, rats in the 0, 1, and 5 mg/kg groups developed normally in the post weaning period as measured by an array of developmental milestones, including neurobehavioral performance. Effects on F, reproduction and lactation and on post natal viability of the F, pups were seen at the 5 mg/kg dose. The NOAELS from the study and the effect(s) seen at the next highest dose are:
F, generation - | mg/kg; at the 5 mg/kg dose body weight effects
- 5 mg/kg for reproductive; at the 10 mg/kg dose higher incidenceofstillbom
F, generation --puLpesss than | mg/kg, the lowest dose tested, based on body weight effects
-5 mg/kg for reproductive effects, the highest dose tested
Dronif AscrsmentReporPFS Appendic
5
000065
F, generation - | mg/kg; at S mg/kg reduced litter size, pup viability and growth
`The resultsof the 2-generation studies with PFOS and N-EtFOSE are very similar with respect 10 the typesofeffect seen, dose response, and lowest doses that cause effects. Maternal body weight changes are observed in the pre-natal teratology studies and the two generation studies with both chemicals. However, the mortality seen in the perinatal periodoflife has no parallel in the prenatal studies. While modest increases in resorptions were seen in the 2-generation studies, in the main, pup development until the timeofbirth was fairly normal. Gross appearance notwithstanding, the incidenceof pup mortality was severe (at the higher doses) on the day of birth and in the immediate perinatal period. The study design did not permit insight as to the factor(s) that contribute 10 the lethal response. Resultsofthe 2-generation studies indicate that fertility and reproductive performance are not impaired at doses that cause adverse body weight effects on males and females. It is not clear whether the resorptionsaredue to direct effects on the fetus or secondary to altered maternal physiology associated with decreased food consumption and weight gain.
APFOS cross-foster study was performed to ascertain the roleofpre-natal, post-natal, or combined exposure on pup mortality and health (RS48). A single gavage dose, 1.6 mg/kg PFOS, was used. Female Sprague Dawley ratsweretreated with 0 or 1.6 mg/kg daily during a 42 days premating, mating, pregnancy, and a lactation periodof21 days. At birth, 25 litters from control or treated dams were cross-fostered with 12 13 control or PFOS treated dams. Thus four groups were established. The resultsofthe study that ended on post-natal day 21 is summarized in Table 412.
`Table 4-12. Cross-foster PFOS Study Postnatal Pup Effects During 21 Day Lactation Period"
PFOS Exposure' Number Total Percent Litters Pup Gestation Lactation __ Dead Pups Mortality Affected Weight'
0
0
39 16 3 200
0
16
2 sm 20 2 22
16
0
16166 96 10 267
16
16 4m 28 246
*extracted from RS48 refers to daily female dose of0 or 1.6 mg/kg PFOS. "mean weight in Grams on LD 14.
Mortality was increased (9.6%) in pup litters whose exposure was solely in utero. Mortality was
greatest (19.2%) in pup liters exposed in utero who also nursed treated females. There was no
increase in mortality in pup litters not exposed in utero that nursed treated females; body weight
gain was reduced. The greatest reduction in weight gain was in pup litters who had in utero and
lactation exposure. PFOS serum levels were determined in liters and dams from this study.
raf nitsscssmen Repo PFOS- pend
8
000066
These data are summarized in Table 4-13.
Table 4-13. PFOS Serum Values at Time of Necropsy (LD 21/22) in ug/mL (ppm)
PFOS Exposure' Gestation Lactation
Nursing Dams Mean
Litters Pooled Mean
0
0
0.05* (12%
0.05% (6)
0
16
8296 (13)
2235 (6)
16 0
202 (13)
5388 (6)
16 16
8897 (12)
89.71 (6)
* 0.05 uG/mL is Lower Limit ofQuantitation. ** Number in parentheses is numberofsamples
`The data clearly indicate that treatmentof a pregnant dam can result in significant levelsofin utero exposure to POS. This is demonstrated by serum values of about 54 ppm in 21 day old `pups who had only in utero exposure. PFOS also appears to be readily secreted in milk, as. evidenced by pups with no gestational exposure having serum levelsofabout 22 ppm after nursing treated dams. Drawing upon results from a pharmacokinetic study discussed in 4.3.1 (RSS2) it appears that a PFOS fetal serum levelof ~117 ppm just preceeding birth is associated with perinatal toxicity and death, e.g., fetuses from dams with exposure to 1.6 mg/kg PFOS. The premating sera concentrationofdams in this dose group averaged 185 ppm.
In summary, in utero exposure to 1.6 mg/kg PFOS via the dam lead to perinatal mortality and reduced growth. In a separate study, matemal exposure to 1.6 mg/kg led to serum levels of 117 uG/mL in fetuses just prior to birth. J utero and peri-natal exposure to 1.6 mg/kg appear to be additive with respect 10 toxic effects and perinatal death in pups. Finally, exposure via milk from mothers receiving 1.6 mg/kg did not cause death although a decrease in pup weight was observed. The serum levels support a hypothesis that the degree and severityof developmental and peri-natal toxicity is directly associated with PFOS concentration.
Ongoing Study
A study is planned that will assess the role of reduced cholesterol metabolism as a cause of perinatal mortality in rats.
43.5 Genetic Toxicity
PFOS. PFOS has been tested for genotoxic activity in a batteryofmicrobial and mammalian systems. These included assays for induction ofgene mutations in Salmonella typhimurium and Escherichia coli, (RS14, RS15, RS16, RS17, RSI8)a test for gene conversion in the D4 strain of Saccharomyces cerevisiae (RS18); an in vitro assay for chromosomal aberrations in human `whole blood lymphocytes (RS21). the mouse micronucleus assay (RS19), and an assay for
raf nitsscssmen Repo PFO Append
E
000067
unscheduled DNA synthesis (UDS) in primary rat liver cell cultures (RS20). PFOS was negative in all assays in which it was tested.
Potassium perfluorooctylsulfonate did not induce reverse mutation at the histidine locus of 5. typhimurium strains TA1535, TA1S37, TA1538, TA98, and TA100, or at the tryptophan locus of E. coli WP2uvrA, and did not induce gene conversion at the try locus in the D4 strainofS. cerevisiae when tested with or without metabolic activation from Aroclor-induced rat liver microsomes at doses up to 5,000 pg/plate (RS15, RSIS).
`The diethanolamine salt ofPFOS was likewise without genotoxic activity in typhimurium strains TA1S35, TA1537, TAI538, TA98, and TA100 when tested at up to 5,000 pg/plate, with and without metabolic activation, and in the D3 strainofSaccharomyces cerevisiae gene recombination assay at up to 5% (RS14).
Potassium perfluorooctylsulfonate did not induce chromosomal aberrations in human lymphocytes when tested at up to cytotoxic concentrations, with or without metabolic activation by Aroclor-induced rat liver microsomes (RS21). Nor did it induce UDS in primary cultures of rat hepatocytes when tested at up to cytotoxic levels (RS20).
In the in vivo mouse micronucleus assay. potassium perfluorooctylsulfonate did not induce `micronuclei in the bone marrowofCrl:CD-1 BR mice given a single gavage doseof 237.5, 450, or 950 mg/kg (RS19).
N-E(FOSE, Negative results have been obtained in batteries ofgenotoxicity testsofN-cthyl perfluorooctane sulfonamidoethanol (N-E(FOSE).
N-EAFOSE gave negative results in micronucleus assays in rats (RS12) and mice (RS11) at doses up to lethal levels by oral gavage. N-E(FOSE, did not induce UDS in liver cellsofras that had received a single doseof 203, 405, or 810 mg/kg by gavage 2-3 hours earlier, or 15-16 hours carlier (RS13). A mammalian cell gene mutation assay in mouse lymphoma cells (RS10), which the authors considered as providing evidenceof mutagenicity in the presenceofmetabolic activation, suffers from a number of methodological and interpretative problems that render it uninterpretable. These deficiencies include:
Inadequate identification of mouse lymphoma test strain; Use of excessive, potentially toxic levels of S9 mix; Useofan inappropriate positive control chemical for the non-activation assay; Poor detection of small colony mutants;
Useofexcessively high, toxic concentrationsoftest chemical in the mutation assays; Useofan excessively long mutant expression period (3 days); Useofinsufficiently large numbersofcells for mutation assays; and Over-interpretationofstudy results.
N-MeFOSE. N-methyl perfluorooctane sulfonamidoethanol (N-MeFOSE) gave uniformly negative results in an Ames assay in Salmonella typhimurium (RS22), a mammalian cell gene
Drath nial scssmen Repos PROS-Appen|d
000068
mutation assay in L5178Y mouse lymphoma cells (RS24), a human lymphocyte chromosome aberration assay (RS23), a at liver cell UDS assay (RS26), and a rat bone marrow micronucleus assay (RS25).
43.6 Any other Human Health Relevant Information
Ocular Irritation PFOS was found to be mildly irritating to the eyesofalbino rabbits when as powder. The ocular imitation was limited to the conjunctiva in the six test rabbits. Irritation was noted at the 1, 24, and 48 hour post-instillation reading times. The maximun irritation score was 9.3 out ofa highest possible score of 110 at the one-hour reading. By 72 hours post-instillation the score subsided 10 0.0 (RS1).
Dermal Irritation
PFOS was found to be non-iritating to the skinofalbino rabbits when tested under conventional Draize procedures. No signsofdermal imitation were observed in any of the test animals at any time during the study period. The primary skin irritation score was 0.0 out ofa highest possible score of 8.0 (RS4).
Sensitization
No reports on the sensitization potential of POS are available.
Human Data
`Thereare no known cases of iritation or sensitization associated with human exposure.
Conclusions
PFOS is potentially a mild iritant on contact with eyes andisnot expected to iitate skin.
4.4 Data from Studies in Humans
4.4.1 Background and Early Medical Surveillance
`There have been two major types of initiatives to examine the healthofthe 3M fluorochemical production workforce: periodic medical surveillance examinations and a retrospective cohort `mortality study. There have been no epidemiological studies of the general (non-occupational) population nor have any other occupational cohorts studies been published.
Following reportsof the findingoforganic fluorine in sera samples, a fluorochemical medical
surveillance program began at 3M's Decatur (Alabama) manufacturing facility in the late 1970s.
`The voluntary program has generally consistedofbiennial testsofclinical chemistries,
pulmonary function, blood counts, accompanied by biomonitoring of fluorochemical exposure.
A total organic fluorine measurement was routinely done until the mid-1990's.A total organic
Tr --
ot
000069
fluorine assay measures the amount of fluorine that was covalently bound to carbon in the serum sample and is not specific for PFOS. When test data were available, a company physician reviewed cach employee's result. These physicians did not, and have not, found abnormalities in individuals that they believed were related to fluorochemical exposure. That is, medical `conditions, medications and lifestyle factors adequately explained any observed laboratory abnormalities.
4.4.2 Medical Surveillance Studies
Beginning in the mid-1990's, the 3M medical surveillance programs at the Decatur and Antwerp (Belgium) plants incorporated serum measurements of PFOS and perfluorooctanoate (PFOA) rather than total organic fluorine (RSS). High performance liquid chromatography-mass spectrometry was the analytical method used to detect and quantify these chemicals. An aggregate analyses was conductedofthe Decaturand Antwerp male employees participating in 1994/1995 (n= 178) and 1997 (n = 149). (There were too few female employees to afford data analysis.) Sixty-one employees participated in the program during both time periods. Results from hematological, standard clinical chemistry tests and several hormone assays (cortisol, dehydroepiandrosterone sulfate, estradiol, follicle stimulating hormone, 17-alpha hydroxyprogesterone, luteinizing hormone, prolactin, sex hormone binding globulin, free testosterone, bound testosterone, and thyroid stimulating hormone) were analyzed in relation to Serum PFOS levels.
During both time periods, serum PFOS levels in 95 percent of the employees were below 6 ppm. `The two plant populations differed by age, body mass index, and alcohol consumption, resulting in differences between the populations in several clinical chemistry parameters. Multivariable analyses adjusted for these potential confounders. When analyzed in aggregate, no consistent significant associations were observed between the employees" serum PFOS levels and the clinical chemistries or hematology parameters for either time period. (Total bilirubin levels appeared to trend downwards; further analysis found that this was restricted to Decatur employees and the values were all within the reference range.) Multivariable regression models were fitted with PFOS level (analyzed as a continuous variable) using linear, as well as nonlinear, transformations in order to maximize the possibility of finding associations between PFOS and the parametersof interest while adjusting for potential confounders.
No consistent associations were observed by plant, by year,orby both. As discussed in the
toxicology section (4.3), the most sensitive clinical chemistry endpoint in rats and monkeys with
increasing exposure to PFOS or N-E(FOSE appears tobe a reduction in serum cholesterol levels.
Itisofnote, therefore, that mean serum cholesterol levels in these production workers remained
constant or increased with increasing serum PFOS levels. An aggregate analysisofboth plants'
HDL levels appeared to show negative association with increasing PFOS level; however, this
was confounded by the fact that all the workers with PFOS levelsof6ppm or greater were older
than workers in the lowest PFOS category, had higher body mass indices (BMIs), and, in 1997,
were only employed at the Decatur plant. Multivariable analyses and stratification by plant
found no consistent associations between HDL and PFOS levels. In 1995, hormone values were
also obtained from a subsampleofemployees with the higher PFOS measurements. After
adjusting for age and body mass index, no significant associations were observed between these
hormones and serum PFO levels, with the exceptionof estradiol. The latter quadratic
Dra nitsssReport PFOS- pends|
@
000070
association was highly influenced by one employee with high PFOS measurement (12.83 ppm) and a large BMI; removalof this employee from the analysis resulted in no significant association with estradiol. `The results from these analyses suggested that, among these Decatur and Antwerp male fluorochemical production employees, significant hematological, clinical chemistry, and hormonal abnormalities were not associated with serum PFOS levels up to 6 ppm. (It was not possible to draw conclusions regarding the small number of employees with serum PFOS levels >6 ppm.) Limitationsofthese surveillance analyses included its cross-sectional design, the voluntary participation rates of less than 50 percent, the small numberofsubjects exposed at the highest levels and a single hormone measurement, rather than multiple hormone mesurements. 4.4.3 Mortality Studies A retrospective cohort mortality studyofemployees who worked at least one year (1961-1990) at the 3MDecatur manufacturing site was conducted to determine whether the mortality experience of these production workforce was significantly different from that which would be expected [RSS]. A total of 1,957 employees (1,639 males and 318 females) constituted the cohort, which represented 37,915 person-yearsoffollow-up. Only six employees (0.3%) were lost to follow-up. Vital status was searched through 1991 using company records, credit bureaus, Social Security Administration and the National Death Index. A total of 74 deaths were reported and 72 (97%) death certificates were obtained. Observed deaths were compared to an expected number calculated by using indirect standardization techniques with three comparison populations: United States; Alabama; and regional Alabama counties. Analyses were also stratified by whether male employees ever and only worked in the chemical and film plants at the Decatur sie. No statistically significant elevations in Standardized Mortality Ratios (SMRs) were found for any specific causeofdeath or for anyofthe comparisons. Table 4-14 provides the data for the `most common causesofdeath,
raf nia ssssmen Repo PFO-spend1
&
000071
Table 4-14. Retrospective Cohort Mortality Analysis for Male Employees of the
Coeorveat |ome|rscurt| ere Decatur Chemical Plant (n = 1,050)
95% Confidence
AN Nfalgnant Neoplasms
`Canocftehre Bronchus,
`Trachea, or Lung
7
120.7
485-2487
Despite the excellent follow-upofthe cohort, there were three important limitations to thisstudy:
1) the few person-years of follow-up;
specific job exposure matrix,
2)
the
short
latency
period;
and
3)
the
lack
oa f PFOS-
4.44 Work In Progress
3M, in conjunction with epidemiologists from the University of Minnesota Division of Occupational and Environmental Health, is in the midst ofcompleting an updateofthe cohort mortality study. Several methodological improvements have occurred since the original study, including the computerizationofthe work history record for all past and present employees,
`which, in conjunction with information regarding serum fluorochemical levels acquired from
`medical surveillance exams and the random sample assessment (described above), will allow for the construction ofa PFOS-specifjiocb exposure matrix. Estimated dateofcompletionofthis
udpodnaetaedmosntugdytihse ANnotvweemrbpere,mp2l0o00y.ee(pAopcuolmaptairoanbdlueerteotrtohsepeccotnifviedecnothioarltn`amtourrteaolfitdyesattuhdycecratnifnioctatbee registration in Belgium.)
An additional health-related research effort that is scheduled for completion in 2000 is the
analoyf sheailtsh
chemical and film
claims data from
plant employees.
January
Health
1, 1993, through December 31, 1998, of the Decatur
claims data are not available for analysis purposes
prior to 1993. Clinical Care GroupsTM methodology will be used to group all visits (inpatient
and outpatient), procedures, ancillary services, and prescription drugs considered in the
diagnosis, treatment, and managementofapproximately 400 diseases or conditions. An episode
`will be considered a constellationof one or more claims data records representing an occurrence
ofa disease or condition for a particular condition. The observed group claims data will be
compared to
and gender.
an expected number calculated by indirect
Corrected for their different age structures,
standardization
the ratioof the
methods
observed
to
to
adjust for
expected
ag
e
chemical plant claims experience will be compared to the film plant's [Ederer and Mantel, 1974]
000072
45 Initial Assessment for Human Health
4.5.1 Approach to Assessment
ePxFpOoSsehdapsobpueleantiiodnenst.ifTihedisininsiteiralumasssaemspslmeesntfrisomfobcoutshedococnuptahteiqouneaslltyioannodfwnhone-tohcecrupaantdiotnoawllhyat erixstke.ntBtohtehleepvieldsemoifolPoFgOicSalfoaunnddainnismearlutmoxsiacmoplloegsy fdartoamatrheosaevapiolpaublleatfioornusspeoisnetahehausmsaesnsmheenatl.th
uPnFdOerSstcaonmdeisngtooftbeheprreesleanttivienihmupmoartnasneceruomftfhroosme adivfafreireetnytosfosuorucersc.esSaonmdethmearye iasriasseyfetronmo clear efoxrpoesxaumrpelteo),prwehciulresoortmhoerleecxuploessurtehamt adeygbreadteo aPnFdOmSeittasbeloflitzherotuogPhFuOnSder(dNe-tEetrhmiynleFdOSE Alcohol, einnvvoilrvoinnmgenctoamlpapraitshownasyos.f eIxttiemfaorlt(haidsmrienaissotnertehda)t dtohesetsypkincaolwanpptroobaechastsoocriiastkeadssweistshmaednvte,rse heevaelnthpoesfsfiebctlse wfiotrhPFdoOsSe.s eTxhpeeraipepnrcoeadchbytothbeeptoapkuelnathieornesiunnvodlevreesv,ailnusatteiaodn,,ciosmnpoatraipspornosproifatseerourm lfeovuenlds tihnaetxhpaovseedbepeonputlhaetisounbsj.ectTohfisepaipdpermoiaoclhogisi,cfaolrasnedvetroaxlirceoalsoognisc,alliskteuldyietso wpirtohvisdeergurmealteevrels scientific certainty than the more traditional approach.
Ofrnoemrseeavseornalfodriftfheirsecntonscoluurscieos,n shoasthaaltrtehaedysbeereunmnfoitneddi:ngPsFrOefSlercetatcohtealshaunmdaancceuxmpuolsautrees. in blood cMuorrreeonvtleyr,esbteicmaautseed PtoFbOeS3i0s0redlaaytsi,vesleyrapelresvisetlesnti,ntwegirtahteanexeploismiunraetioovnerhatlifm-el.ifeEixntehmuamlandosses, edisfpfeicciualltloy foobrtsauibnsitnafnocremsahtaiovninognmtuhletidpelgereseooufrcveasr,iaabrielihtiyg.hlSyevraruimablleeveolvsearrteilmiek,elayndtoitbeisaofftaren more stable estimate of long-term exposure.
Uncertainty is the traditional
reduced when risk assessment, based
assessments on intra- and
are based on interspecies
direct comparisonsofserum levels. comparisonsofexternal doses,
In
AfaDctMorEs tdhiatffaerreengceenseraarle,onfottenchuenmkicnaolw-snpeacnidfiacr,e ianccnaotuunret.edTfhorebPyFtOheSianstsreosdsumcteinotndoefscurnicbeerdtahienrteyin
dgroeeastenrotresluifafbielritfyrothmatnhitsheiympdoortwahnetnsoeuxrtceemaolf dunocseertiasiunsteyd.and interspecies extrapolations have
oMfohsetalotfhtehfefrecetcsenitnlfyoprrmaotdiuocnedinerpeildaetimoinoltoogsyeraunmd tleovxeilcso;lcougryrednattaanhdavfeutiunrveosltvueddietshehadveevebleoepnment designed to acquire similar typeofdata.
ref nia tsssnesRepo PFS sppendic
6
000073
45.2 Health Effects of PFOS and Dose-Response Relationships
eDfafteactfsrformomsttuhdeiePsFoOfS3Msefrluumorloecvehlesmiicdaenltipfrioedducitnitohnosweorpkopeurlsathiaovnes.thTushefadrarteavedaerlievdenforaodmverse medical surveillance investigations and from a retrospective cohort mortality study. oBfegpiunlnmionngarinytfhuencltaiteon1,9w70e'rse,pbeirenfnoiramledheomnatwoolrokgeircsalatan3dM'clsinDieccaaltcuhremmiasnturfyactetsutrs,inaglofnacgilwiitty.h tests fUlnuiolritnheeamnidd-wa1s99n0o'ts,PFfOlSu-osrpoecchiefmiicc.alIenxpnoosnueroefwtahes ybeaasresdofotnelsytoinngthdeidleovcecluopfatsieornuaml pohrygsainciicans, report abnormalities they believed to be related to organic fluorine exposures.
pIrno1d9u9ct4i/o1n99f5acailnidtieasgawiansianss19e9s7s,edthien rheelaalttihoonsfhmiaplteo esmeprluomyleeevselasto3fMP'FsOSD.ecaItnuradadnidtiAonnttwoetrhpe pstearnfdoarrmdedseotsnofacsluibnsicctaolfcthheemiwsotrrkyerasn"dbhleomoadt.olIongitchael1t9e9s4ts/,9a5sssaaymsplfionrg1117d8ifefemrpelnotyheoersmwoenrees were celvianliucaatlecdheamnidstirny,19o9r7,ho1r4m9ownealreabtnesotremda;lailtliweserweerveolausnstoeceirsa.tedNwoitsihgnsiefriucamntlehveemlastuoplotgoic6apl,pm in beietchaeurosefotfhethseteuxdpyepreirmieondtsa.lSoebrseurmvacthioolnessttehraotlPlFevOelSsawtehrieghneort daoffseecstecda;ustheidsefcilnidniensgiinstshiigsnificant parameter.
`Ayea1r9a9t5trheet3roMspeDcetciavteucrohporrotdumcotritoanliftaycislittuydyreovfea1l,e9d57noemstpaltoisyteiecasllwyhsoighniafdicwaonrtkeeldevaattiloenasstionnreisk
for any specific measurements.
causeofdeath,
including
cancer.
This
study
did
not
include
PFOS
serum
iTnhfeosremasttiuodinesfoorfripsrkodauscsetsisomnewnto.rkeFrisr,st,altthheoyugihnvloilmvieteddirienctseavtetreamlptwsaytso,idpernotviifdyeaidmvpeorrsteahnetalth
eefxfaemcitnsaitnitohneofmcoasntcheirghalnydeoxtphoesrecdauhsuemsaonfmpoorptulaaltiitoyn,s.butSeaclosnoda,wtihdeey riannvgoelovefncoltinoincallypaanrameters
that are likely to the same time, it
rmeupsrtesbeentrseecnosgintiizveedintdhiatcatthoersstoufdiaeddveprospeuleaffteicotnssbaarseendootnreepxrpeesreinmteanttivaelofdattah.e
At
`hgeeanletrha,lapnodpurleaptrieosnenitnwtohamtetnheiyndoonlnyotaviencrlyudleimcihtielddrweany,.theSteulddieerslyn,oowr tuhnodseerswuafyfemrianyg afdrdormesilsl-
someof these limitations.
rMaobrbietsex(tteenrsaitovleodgaytoanloyn).theAsefdfeicstcsuosfsePdFiOnSthaerienatvraoidluacbtlieonfrtoomthsitsusdeicetsiionn m(4o.n1k),eyresp,eartat-sd,osaen.d
uannidmearlgostmuedtieasboolnisNm-Ele(aFdOinSgEtaonPdFNOS-.MeTFhOusS,Echoamvpearbaeteinveintcolxuidceodlobgeycasutusdeiebsootfhtchoemsep:ounds
pcroemcpuorsuonrdssaraendduPFeOnStirceoluyl1d0rtehveeaelndwhpertohdeurctaonfyotfhteihremeetffaebcotlsoifsmt(hePFfOoSr)m,erortwmoayPFaOlsSo involve
nonoewoarvmaiolraebloeftohnePFinOtSe,rmNe-dEiaXrFyObSrEe,aaknddowNn-pMreodFuOcStsEodremmeotnasbtorlaitteess.aTchoenssiusbtsetnacnytoiafledfafetcatbsa,seand
some data suggest that these effects may be due to PROS. Additional study will be necessary to
ref niatsssmen Repo PFS-pend1
3
000074
confirm thi initial impression.
cIhnorleecsetnetrorlepleevaetl-sd,ocsaeussteudrieedsucintiroantss,iPnFbOodSyawnedigthhetsgeapirne,caunrdsocracuosemploivuenrdesnlraerdguecmeensteraunmd vmaocnukoeliyzsa.tioAnt. thTehheigshaemset pdoasteisemtoesfteedf,fePcFtsOiSs ohbassecravuesdedinuPneFxOpSlaeixnpeodsdueraethsstuidniemsoinnkveoylvsiangnd rats. Similar effects were observed in earlier repeat-dose studiesof PFOS.
aBdovtehrsPeFrOeSpraondducNti-vEe(aFnOdSdEevhealvoepbmeeenntaelvaelfufeacttesdifnora ttewroa-tgoelnoegircatcifofnectrastisnturdayt.s anNedirtahbebritcsoamnpdoufonrd
has been demonstrated to both compounds affected
produce teratogenic effects. In fetal survival and body weight
the two-generation studies, gains in dams and fetuses.
however,
`pTrheesednotseed-riensTpaobnlsee 3r-e5l,atwihoinschhipissfroerprsoodmueceedffbecetlso,wasasidTeanbtlifei4e-d15i.n PAFtOSthidsotsiimneg, stthuediNe-s,MaerFe OSE arensdulNts-,Eb(uFtOaSreEndoattas,ufafsicsiuemnmtlayrciozmepdleinteSetcotbieonuss4e.d2.f3oraqnudan4t.i2t.a4,tiavreeaunasleydsitso.confirm the PFOS
Dra nilAssesmentReportPFOS Appen|d
6
000075
`Table
4-15.
PFOS Toxicity Data Concentrations, and
for Mammals: Observed Cumulative Dose
Effects,
Serum
and
Liver
PROS
|}
Group
Observed
Serum PFOS |(Li<ve4r PPFEOASS|Cumulati.ve |
Concentration
Dose
| Feet
pm) (pp.m) (mee)
26-week Capsule-Dosing Study in Cynomolgus Monkeys
[Olsmgkgd NOEL
TT 8 | wl a3
hepatocyte enlargement
137
females
males
0.75 mg/kg/d
Dfoerat2h6omraelaersly sacrifice > 150, <300
14-Weck Dietary Study in Sprague Dawley Rats
> 100, <137
l= i hypertrophy and vacuolization [S2O0ppppmmFMeamleasles [|NHeOpaEtoLcellular| a1s34]
hypertrophy and vacuolization; decreased cholesterol; increased AAT hypertrophy and vacuolization
s5e99a.9s3] 33]
0.4 mg/kg/d Dam [NOEL
4714500 (n=
perme [OR yihee EG
5)
perveen Jom eee | EG 1.6 mg/kg/d Dam | Slight body weight
61)852140 (n=
GE
reo[FS pEGer [ev [wre]
ra itlFst Ror FOS Append
B
000076
Oberg | Serompr0s|FERS |Comune `Table 4-15.CoPncFeOnStrTaotxiicointsy,Daantda CfourmuMlaamtmiavlesD:osOebserved Effects, Serum and Liver PFOS
[
T
Liver PFOS
G[ roup
|
Effect
Concpernitmreaytion n
(Dhosee
1.6 mg/kg/d Dam |Sight body weight
"
1582866 (n=
pm)
EG
4
32 mg/kg/d Dam |Body weight
368236 (n=
PM
16)
3.2
EG
mg/kg/d
Fetus
Stillbirth, survival
191+264 (n=
6
N/A|
32mg/kg/d Dam
EG
Body weight
180+41.5 (n=
5
24)
! PM = Pre-Mating, afier 42 daysofdosing; and EG = Endof Gestation, day 21 ofgestation
pExpammi(nhaytpieorntorofpThaybalned4v-a1c5uorleivzeaatlisonthiant tthhee elifvfeercstosfofmaPlFeOrSatoscicnurtrhien1g4a-twseeerkusmtuldevye)lsreopfr4es5e.n6ts tlhiveermiefnfiecmtusminemffaelcet lraetvselisfo1r7.th9ipspcmo.mpoTuhnedN.OTEhLe Nfoor Othbisseerfvfeecdt EifnfefcetmaLleeverlat(s NisO6E2L.)9 fpoprmt.heItseis dneoctleiwnoerstihnycthhoaltesttheerolilvelreveeflfsecatrseaarlesonootbsoebrsveerdveidn imnomnoknekyesyast usnetrilumselrevuemlsleovveelrs e1x0c0epepdm1.00 ppm; oRfedcoosvienrgy astnuddiseesruinmmcohonlkeesytesrohlavleevselhsorwentutrhnattothneorhmeapla.tiTcheenlNaOrgEeLmenftrormestohlev6es-muopnotnhcmesosnaktieoyn study is 85 ppm (serum PFO),
dPauypsosufrdvoivsailnigs bauftfepcrtee-dmaatdivnegr.selTyhwehNeOnEdLamfosretrhuismelfefvecetl,s mreeaacshur1e8d5 ipnpdma,mmseaatsuthreedsaamfteerpr4e2-
`mating time, is fetal effects are
47.1 not
ppm. Thus, although the serum levels in observed unless the dam enters pregnancy
dams with
declines a serum
during gestation, PFOS levelof ca
the
p18p5mpipnmt;hethreatpduapsmowifalldbaemtahkaevniansgtahseerreulemvalnetveNloOfEuLptfoor4a7s.s1espspinmgapreerinnoattaalt erfifsekc.tsT.hus, 47.1
`The NOELS from the animal studies useful for assessing human risk are shown in Table 4-15.
[rr --
@
000077
Table 4-16. NOELS from Animal Studies to be Used for Initial Assessment of Human Risk
meres om [TT] NOEL
(PFOS Serum Level)| Source
Effect at Next
Estimated
Higher Serum Level| Cumulative Dose
17.9 ppm
Td-week, repeai-dose,| Liver enlargement, |~17 mg/kg
WT Tppm 85 ppm
2-generation reproduction, rats
Reduced fetal survival | 16.8 mgkg | as measured in dams,
pre-mating
6 month, `monkey
repeat-dose,
|
Liver enlargement; decreased cholesterol
|
27.3
mg/kg
levels
4.5.3 Other Experimental Data Related to Health Effects
PviFvOoSt,esNts-Efo(rFgOeSnEo,toaxnidc Npo-teMntciFalO.SEThhearveeisbeneonesvuibdjeenccteeodfatonayn sexutcehnspoitveentbiaatltefroyrotfheisnevitro and in compounds.
w`Thheetsheesrutbhsitsaenfcfeesctarheasalasnoyrerlealtaitvieolnyshwiepatko itnhdeuocbesresorvfepdertooxxiicspormoepesritniersoodfenttsh.eseItciosmnpootukndnso.wnAt stheivsertailmet,yptehseomfecexhpalnoirsamtosryunidnevrelsytiingagttiooxniscitthyatamreanyotbeugnidnertsotsohode.d l3igMhthoanshuondwerthceosnescidoemrpaotiuonnds produce toxicity.
45.4 Initial Assessment of Risk
Occupational Exposures and Risks
ShaevreumexlheivbeiltseodflPevFeOlsSininth3eMrapnrgoeduocft1io0n-1w3orpkpemr.s aDvierreactgestluedsisetsohafnp2ropdpumc,tiaonndwsoormkeerwsohrakveers
rheevmeaatloeldogniocaelviadnednccleoinfiecxalcechsesmimsotrtrayltietsytsaandndnobyevaisdseaynsceooffe11ffdeicftfseraesntmehaorsmuorneedsb,yatstsaenrduamrd
PFOS levels.
levels up to Within the
l6impiptmat.ioSnseorfutmhecshoelessttuedireosl,ltehvieslsinafroernmoattiaofnfescutgegdesintsthtihsatrawnogrekoefrssearruemnoPt FatOS
trhiastk aPtFtOhSe siesrausmsolceivaetlesdrweipotrhtesdo.meAneifmfeacltssttuhadtiewsoouflPdFnOoSt,beN-eExpteFcOtSeEd,toanbde Nfo-uMnedFinOSthEe reveal
occupational health studies animal studies, as shown in
because of lower serum Table 4-16, range from
PFOS serum
concentrations. The NOELS from levels of 17.9 ppm to 85 ppm.
the
tAhseummoisntghtihgehlnyonex-phousmeadnwporrikmeartse biseatrakseenruasmtlheeveblesstapapnriomxailmmatoedleyl1f5orpeefrfceecnttsoifn thhuemNanOsE,Lthaennd
tahveerraegsueltwsorfkreorm ltehveel1s4a-rweee5k0 rtaitmsetsudlyo,weprrotdhuacntithoenNwoOrEkLerienxmpoonskuereyss.areO,nattthheeoutpheprerhaenndd,, umsoirneg
than one-hoaftlhfe NOEL and, on average, are about 10 times lower than the NOEL.
rAesduecxepslamianendyoeafrltiheer,utshuealdiurneccteritnatienrtsipeescaiesssoccoimapteadriwsiotnhsionftseresrpuecmielseveexltsrarpaotlhaetriotnh,anmoexsetrnal dose
Dre tilAsset Ror FOS-Appeic
Ed
000078
seisgpneicfiiaclalnyttfhroascetiaosnosfoctihateedunwcietrhtaAinDtyMEfacdtiofrfsetryepnicceas.llyThuisse,ditnoteuxmt,rarpeodluatceesftrhoemnaeneidmaflosr ato hbuemlaonws).areMogreeneorvaelrl,yulnacregretratihnatny tfhaocstoersusuesdedfofrowrotrhkeegrenpeorpaulla(tnioonn-so,cbcuepcaatuisoenatlhe) plaotptuerlaarteionnot(see expected to exhibit the same high degree of variability in sensitivity to toxic effects. pLirtotdluecsteirounmwoPrFkOerSsdaarteaeaxrpeoasveadiltaobluenrfeoarcotcecdu,pcaotnicoennatlreaxtpedossutraertsinign mvaatreiroiuaslsu.seTrhfeacimlaijtioersi.t3yMof dreoswindsuatlreuanrmeawcotrekdersstaarrtienegxmpaotseeridaltotfhaltuocroouclhdembiecaalbsporrobdeudctasndthmatettaybpoiclailzleydctoontPaFiOnS.lessAlthtahnou1g%h iltarsgeeermssafleitkyelmyatrhgaitnssucthhawnodroke3rMs epxrhoidbuicttlioownewroerxkpeorss,urtehilsevceolnsc,launsidotnhecraenfonroetwboeufludlldyemonstrate dproeccuumresnotrseda.reThhaendslteudd,yosefemnosnt-oprsoudpupcotritoint workers in 3M's Japanese facility, where PFOS.
General (Non-Occupational) Exposures
`bTlhoeodcubrarennktslyreavveaaillsabtlheatdantoan-forcocmupsaatmipolnialngeoxfpobsluoroedsftrooPmFsOelSecrtaendgheufmraomn cpao.pu0l.a0t1io10ns0.a1ndppfmr,om a`sTsheocuipapteedr aednvdeofrstehiefsfercatnsgienitshaeboocuctuGpa0ttiiomneasl lstouwdeiers.thaInt tisheallseovealbo(6utpp1m80)tfoo8un5d0 ttoimbeeswliotwheorut tinhtaenrstpheecNieOsEcLomSpafrriosmotnhseofratsaenrdumnolnev-ehlusmraendupcreismuantceersttauidinetsi,esrersepleactteidvetloy.ADAMgaEind,iftfheerednicreecst. `mTeamkbenertsogoetfhtehre, gtehneedraatlapforpoumlahtiuomnaanreansdubasntainmtailalsltyudbieelsoswuglegveesl!stahsastoPciFaOteSdsweirtuhmadlveveerlsseienffects.
4.4.5 Uncertainties in Assessment and Work in Progress
`The initial assessment presented above is based on a based on an interspecies comparisonofserum PFOS
substantial levels and
bodyof health is more certain
effects data. than typical
It
is
aunscseerstsamiennttys,trwahnsilcahteasrteobaasneededonfocrrsosmsa-lslpeercuinecsecrtoamipnatryisfaocntsoorsffeoxrtcermoasls-dsopseecsi.esTehxitsrarpeoldautcieodns.
aInbolvigehtshoofutlhdisncootnbcelucsoimonp,artehedmwairtghitnhsesleapragreartmiangrgNiOnEsLoSbssefrrvoemdhourmuasnedexinpotshuermeolreevetlyspidceaslcribed
assessment.
Trehdeucleimditwahteionnsadadsistoicoinaatledepwiidtehmitohleougsiecaolf ihnuvmeastnigdaattiaonhsaavree aclormepaldeytebde.enRiedseunlttifsiefdr,oamncdhrwoinlilc.be:
rroedgeanrtdisntgudtiheeseofffePctFsoOfScahnrdonNi-cEetxFpOosSuEreasrewsitlilllbuencdoemreevaavlauialtaibolne. inDetfhienfiuttiuvree.coMnecclhuasniiosntsic
understanding ofoffspring in
of the underlying causesoftoxicity, particularly the two-generation study is under study.
those
relating
to
reduced
survival
Ahdudmiatinosnearla.daTthaeardiesftorirbtuhtcioomnoinfgPpFeOrtSailneivneglstoatchceorbdlionogd tloevaegles, agnednddeirs,trainbdutgieonoogfrapPhFiOcSloicnation
will will
be available for future assessments. As add substantially to understanding this
detailed area.
in
Section
4.2.4,
several
additional
studies
Dra ilAsse Ror EOS Appeic
7
000079
5.0 CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS
b`TohdisyorfepdoarttasurmemlaartiinzgeshutmheaninfaonrdmaetnivoinrothnamtenistaalvaielxapbolseaurseosftJouPlyFO20S,
2000. There is a and the possible
substantial biological
oefcfceucptastioofnatlhesaendexnpoons-uorcecsu.paTthiiosnailnfpoorpmualtaitoinonssugagreesntostthaastsohcuiamtaend
serum PFOS with adverse
levels health
found in effects.
Similarly, Additional
levels found in the environment research now underway will be
and in wildlife are used to refine this
not associated with initial assessment.
adverse
effects
iOnncglouidnegensvtiurdioensmeinntsaelvesroaulrcaereaasssweislslmeinmtp,rhovuemathnisexinpiotsiaulreas(stehsrsomuegnht soefrarimsek.asuArreemaesnut)n,decrhrsotnuidcy
studies in Muchof
laboratory animals and this information will be
additional tissue measurementsof available in the next year.
PFOS
from
previous
studies.
DrIti Assent por PF-ApOpeSic
"
000050
6.0 REFERENCES
3M Company. Perfluorooctane Sulfonate: Toxicology Data. January 21, 1999.
Current Summary of Human Sera, Health and
Baril, A., Presented
and at
P. Mineau. 1996. the 17* Annual
A distribution-based approach to Meeting of the Organization
improving avian risk assessment. for Economic Cooperation and
Development, Washington, D.C.
Belisle J, Hagan DF erroncously reported
(1978). as 0.02
Anal mg; it
Biochem. should be
87, 545 0.02).
(Note
Error:
In this report the blank was
BeliJs(1l98e1),. Science 212, pp. 1509-1510.
Bisemeier, JA and Harris, DL, 1974. Madison, WI
Report T-1117.
WARF No. 4102871, WARF Institute, Inc.,
fCahcatoprmsfaon,rePc.oMl.o,giAc.alFariitsbkroatshseers,smaenndt.D.EnBvriorownn..T1o9x9.8.ChAemcr.i1ti7c:al e9v9a-l1u0a8tionofsafety (uncertainty)
ECOFRAM. Assessment
1999. ECOFRAM Terrestrial Methods, Washington, D.C.
Draft
Report.
Ecological
Committee
on
FIFRA
Risk
Ederer, F, Mantel, N (1974). Epidemiol. 100:165-167.
Confidence limits on the ratioof two Poisson Variables,
Am. J.
TEensvtisrionnEmnevnitrCoannmaednat.al19T9o9x.icGouloigdya.ncEePDSoc1/uRmMe/n3t4.onEAnpvpilriocnamteinotnaalnTdecInhtneorlproegtyatCieonntorfe,SiEnngvlie-rsopnemceinets Canada, Ottawa, Ontario.
Guy, WS (1972). PhD. Thesis, University of Rochester, Rochester, NY.
pHearufgluhoormo,octBanoained aOcyisdte(iPnF,OAS.),19p9e2r.fluoTrhoeoctmaencehasunlipshmonuincdearcliydin(gPFtOheSAh)ypaonldipcelmoifcibreifcfeacctido.n Biochim. Biophys. Acta. 1128, 65-72.
cIkyetdoac,hrT.o,meFPuk-u4d5a0,anKd.,peMroorxii,soL,meEpnroomliofteor,atiMo.n,inKroamtalii,verT.byapnedrflSuuograi,naTt.ed1o9c8t7a.nesuIlnfdouncitcioancido.f
In: peroxisomes York, 304-208.
in
Biology and Medicine,
H.D.
Fahimi
and
H.
Sics,
Eds,
Sprger Verlag,
New
Johnson, J.D., carbon-14 in
Gibson, S.J. and Ober, RE. rats afier administration of
1984. Cholestramine-cnhanced fecal ammonium ["Clperfluorooctanoate
elimination of or potassium
["Clperfluorooctanesulfonate. Fund. Appl. Toxicol. 4, 972-976.
[r----------
3
000081
Ltouxtitciikt,yRd.a,taan(dwiTt.h Aalsdpeencbiearlgf.ocu19s95o.n ELxDtSraOpvoallauteisofnofracbtiordrss atondbemaumsmeadlisn).caRseepoofrtsNmaol.l6s7a9m1p0l2e0s29o.f National Institute of Public Health and Environmental Protection, Bilthoven, The Netherlands. NPraobtbeeinf.eldMaDs.te1r9s98T.heAsins,InUvneisvteirgsaititoynoofftMhineneEfsfoetcat.sofThFelsuios rroescehaermchicpaeorlnfsorLmiveedraFtaattnyd Ascuipdp-oBritneddibnyg Mm
NfaatbtbyeafceilddanDa.l,oBguuetefnrhoomff1fa,ttyBaacsisd Nc.ararinedr pSreoatceaitnsA.by1w9y98e.th-D1i4s,p6l4a3c,eamemnmtoofnia umflpueorrfelsucoernotolcytlaanobaetlee,d
potassium Accepted,
perfluorooctane sulfonate Toxicologist 1998).
and
other
known
peroxisome
proliferators.
(SOT Abstract
Nishioka Institute.
M,, Strauss Columbus,
W. 2000. OH.
Design
and
Structure
of the
Multi-City
Study,
Battelle
Memorial
Pacz, DM, deBianchi, LP, Gil BA, Dapas O, Coronato, RG (1980). Fluoride 13:65.
`Pooxtyhgaepnrabgoamdba Va,nd(1r9e7v5e)r.seDeextterramcitniaontitoencohfntioquteasl. flAunoarliynteiicnasleBriuomcahnedmo6t8h:er51b2i-o5lo2g1ical materials by
iPnotbhiaoplorgaigcaadla fVl,uidSsi.ngePrroRc,eAdrumroesbtarsoendgWonDad(s1o9r7p1)t.ionDeotferflmuionraitdieonioofnioonniccal(cpiluusmipohnoizsapbhlaet)e.fluAorniadle Biochem 42:350-359.
Roach DE (1982). 25,1982.
Fluorochemical Control Study.
Unpublished report.
St.
Paul:3M Company, May
rSeavmispiloen., BE.SE/.E,RD/.TMM.-8O6p/rRe3s.ko,RiasnkdAGs.seWs.smSeutnetr.Pr1o9g9r6a.m,ToHxeiaclotlhogAiscsaelsbsemnecnhtmRaerskesafrocrhwDiilvdilisfieo:n,1O9a9k6 Ridge National Laboratory, Oak Ridge, TN.
SIncvreesetniignagtioInnfoofrHmiatgihoPnroDdautcatioSentVoMlaunumaelChOemficTahles. O1E99C7.DThPirrodgRreavmismieon.OnOEThCeD CSoec-rOeptearriaattive
ISncvreesetniignagtioInnofforHmiatgihonProDdautcatiSoentVoMlaunmuaelChOemficTahles. O1E99C7D. TPhirrodgrReavmimseionO.nOETCheD CSoec-rOeptearriaattive
Singer L and Ophaug RH (1979). Chem 25:523-525.
Concentrationsofionic, total, and bound fluoride in plasma.
Clin
SPoehrlfelnuiourso,octAa-nKe.,sulEfroinkiscsoacni,d AisMa.potHenotgsitnrdoumce,roCf.p,erKoixmilsaondm,alMfattaynadciDdeBP-ioerxried,atiJo.nW.and19o9t3,her 9ac0t-i9v3i.ties known to be effected by peroxisome proliferators in mouse liver. Pharmacol. Toxicol. 72,
Suter, G.W. 1993. Ecological Risk Assessment. Lewis Publishers, Boca Raton, FL. [---- --
a
000082
`Taves D (19684). 1051.
Evidence that there are two formsoffluoride in human serum.
Nature 217:1050-
Taves D (1968). Electrophoretic mobilityofserum fluoride. Nature 220:582-583. cThaavreacsteDr,izaGtuioyn.W,In:BrFeilyleWrR,(e1d9s7.6).BioOcrhgeamniisctrfylIunovroolcvairnbgonCsaribnohn-uFmlaunorpilnaesBmoan:ds.PreWvaaslheinncgetoann,d DC:American Chemical Society, pages 117-134.
UflbueolrocFhAe,micSaolrse,naspornelSiDm,inaRroyarcehporDt.EA(m198I0n)d. HygHeAaslstohc sJ.ta4t1u:s58o4f-5p8l9a.nt workers exposed to
UReSs.eaErcPhA.and19D9e8v.elGoupidmeelnitn,esU.fS.orEEncvoilroognimceanltaRlisPkroAtsescetisosnmeAngte.ncEyP,A/WGa3s0h/inRg-t9o5n/,00D2.FC.. Office of
USS. Environmental EPA/630/R-95/02F.
RPirsokteAcstsioenssAmgeenntcFyo.ru1m9,98U..SG.uiEdPeAl.i,neWsasfhoirngEtcoonl,ogDi.cCa.l
Risk
Assessment
Wallace K.B. and biocenergeticsofrat
Starkov A. 1998. liver mitochrondria.
The Dept.
effect of perfluorinated arylalkylsulfonamides on ofBiochemistry and Molecular Biology, University
ofMN Schoolof Medicine. Duluth, MN 55812, USA. Supported by a grant from 3M Company.
fYlaumoraimneotinowGh,olYeosbhliotoadokefKh,umSaatno mTa,leK. imAunralaytTicaanldBiAoncdhoemT
(1989). Distribution 182:371-376.
and
forms
of
CT------a--
7s
000083
APPENDIX I SUMMARY REPORTS FOR PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL PROERTIES
CONTENTS
Reference 55 Reference 57 Reference 58 Reference 59 Reference 60
Boiling Point Melting Point Vapor Pressure Octanol/Water Coefficient Air/Water Partition Coefficient Water Solubility
yp --
I)
000084
BOILING POINT TEST SUBSTANCE Identity: Perfluorooctanesulfonate; may also be referred to as PFOS or FC-95. (1Octanesulfonic acid, 1,1,2,2,3,3,4,4.5,5,6,6,7,7,8,8,8-heptadecafluoro-, potassium salt, CAS # 2795-393) Remarks: Testing was not conducted. Boiling point would be in excess of 400C.
Draft AssesmentReport PROS- Appendic
12 000085
MELTING POINT (Reference No. 55)
TEST SUBSTANCE
Identity: Perfluorooctanesulfonate; may also be referred to as PFOS or FC-95. (1-
Octanesulfonic 2795-393)
acid,
1,12.2,3,3,4,4,5,5,6,6,7,7,8,8,8-heptadecafluoro-,
potassium
salt,
CAS
#
SRaemmpalreksw:asTshteorteedstusnudbesrtaanmcbeieins ta cwohnidtietipoonwsdeprr.iorStaomtpeslteinwg.asPutraikteyndfertoemrm3inMedlottonbuemb9e0r.4291%7.by LC/MS, 'H-HMR, "F-NMR and elemental analyses techniques.
METHOD
Method: OECD 102
GLP: Yes
Year completed: 1998
Remarks: prior 10 use
Study using
utilized a Biichi Melting Point B-540 anthraquinone and 1.8-naphthalimide.
instrument,
calibrated
and
inspected
just
RESULTS
Melting point value in C: 400C (No melting observed). Decomposition (yes-temperature C/ no /ambiguous): No Sublimation (yes/no/ambiguous): No R`meamxairmkusm: spMeecaisfuicraetmieonntfsoor fthtehienmsetlrtuimnegntpuosiendt./ mFeilnteindgrorpalnegtse wweerree nloitmiotbesdetroveZd40t0oCaIdCh,ertehe uniformly or otherwise to the wallsof the melting point tubes.
CONCLUSIONS
`RTehmeamreklsti:ngWphoiilnet/nmoelmteilntginrgaongfetwheastenstotsuobbsstearnvceedwaansd etvhiedreenfto,redicsocuolldornaottiobneofdtetheermtiensteds.amples
was observed. ose.
The white powder tumed to a light brown and eventually black as temperatures
Submitter: 3M Company, Environmental Laboratory P.O. Box 33331 St. Paul, MN 55133
DATA QUALITY
Reliability: Klimisch ranking 1.
RraEtFiEiRaEsNsCsES Repos PROS-pend|
3
000056
Study conducted Maryland.
at
the
request
of
3M
Company
by
Wildlife
Intemational,
Ltd.
of
Easton,
OTHER
Last changed: 5/3/00
rat Iti Assn: Ror PFS. ppeic
4
000087
VAPOR PRESSURE (Reference No. 57)
TEST SUBSTANCE
Identity: Perfluorooctancsulfonate; may also be referred to as PFOS or FC-95. (1Octanesulfonic acid, 1,1,2.2,3,3.4,4,5,5,6.6,7,7,8,8,8-heptadecafluoro-, potassium salt, CAS # 2795-39-3) Remarks: The test substance is a white powder. Sample was taken from 3M lot number 217. Sample was stored under ambient conditions prior to testing. Purity determined to be 90.49% by LC/MS, 'H-HMR, "F-NMR and elemental analyses techniques.
METHOD
Method: OECD 104, U.S. EPA OPPTS 830.7950 GLP (Y/N): Yes Year completed: 1999 Remarks: Determinationofthe vapour pressure was done by using the Spinning Rotor Gauge `method.
RESULTS
Vapor Pressure: 331X10* Pa Temperature C: 20C Decomposition (ves/no/ambiguous): No Remarks: The measured vapour pressure was repeatable.
CONCLUSIONS
uRseimnagrtkhse:spTihnneinvgaproortoprrgesasuugreemoeftthhoedt.est substance was determined to be 3.31X10* Pa at 20C Submitter: 3M Company, Environmental Laboratory, P.O. Box 33331, St. Paul, Minnesota, 55133
DATA QUALITY
Reliability: Klimisch ranking 1
REFERENCES
Study conducted Maryland.
at
the
requestof
3M
Company
by
Wildlife
Intemational,
Ltd.ofEaston,
OTHER
Last changed: 5/3/00 Or niaAssesment ReportPROS Append
Is
000088
OCTANOL/WATER PARTITION COEFFICIENT (Reference No. 58)
TEST SUBSTANCE
Identity: Perfluorooctanesulfonate; may also be referred to as PFOS or FC-95. (1Octanesulfonic acid, 1,1,2.2,3,3,4.4,5,5,6,6,7,7.8,8,8-heptadecafluoro-, potassium salt, CAS # 2795-393) Remarks: The test substance is a white powder. Sample was taken from 3M lot number217. Sample was stored under ambient conditions prior to testing. Purity determined to be 90.49% by LC/MS, 'H-HMR, "F-NMR and elemental analyses techniques,
METHOD
Method: OECD 107 GLP (Y/N): See Remarks Year completed: Study completed 1999. Report completed 2000 Remarks: A feasibility test was conducted to determineif the physical propertiesofthe test substance were compatible with shake flask methodology proposed for use in an n-octanol/water partition coefficient determination.
Upon completionofthe test procedure, adefinitive partition interface was not obtained. Instead, a beige/white emulsion was observed throughout the sample.
RESULTS
Log P,,;: Not determined.
Remarks: The observation ofan inseparable emulsion in the preliminary test precluded conduct ofa definitive test, as indicated in the protocol (No 454/120298/107F/SUB454, 3M Lab Request U2723). Therefore, a study cancellation report was generated by the laboratory conducting the testing after consultation with 3M.
CONCLUSIONS
The study substance exhibits physical/chemical characteristics that make determination of the noctanol/water partition coefficient infeasible by the Shake Flask Method.
Submitter: 3M Company, Environmental Laboratory, P.O. Box 33331, St. Paul, Minnesota, 55133
DATA QUALITY
Reliability: Klimisch ranking NA. Study not feasible.
raf niAssen epor PFO spend
1s
000089
REFERENCES Study conducted at the requestof 3M Company by Wildlife Intemational, Ltd. of Easton, Maryland. OTHER Last changed: 5/3/00
railAsset Ror PFOS- ppeic
5
000030
AIR/WATER PARTITION COEFFICIENT (Reference No. 59)
TEST SUBSTANCE
Identity: Perfluorooctanesulfonate; may also be referred to as PFOS or FC-95. (1Octanesulfonic acid, 1,1,22,3,3,4.4,5,5,6.6,7,7,8,8,8-heptadecafluoro-, potassium salt, CAS # 2795-39-3) Remarks: The test substance is awhite powder. No information was recorded on the purity.
METHOD
Method: There is no standardized methodology used to determine this value for regulatory purposes. The experiment was designed by Dr. Richard Purdy of 3M's Environmental Laboratory and Don MackayofD. Mackay Environmental Research Limited. GLP (Y/N): No Year completed: 1999 Remarks: The following method was devised and used:
`Weigh approximately 0.01 gram of the test substance directly into a tared 250-mL Pyrex" beaker. Record weight. `Transfer 200 mL ofNANOpure water into the beaker using a Class A glass volumetric: pipet. Prepare solvent blank sample. Using a gas-tight syringe, transfear 250 uL aliquot of NANOpure water into a 25-mL Class A glass volumetric flask partially filled with 50% methanol / 50% ammonium acetate buffer reagent. Bring to volume with 50% methanol / 50% ammonium acetate buffer reagent. Ampulate in an amber glassautosamplervial. + Mix and sonicate the test substance in water sample (50 ug test substance/mL. target nominal concentration) for approximately 10 minutes to ensure dissolutionof the test material. + Prepare the control sample. Transfear 250 pL. aliquotof the test substance in water sample into a 25-mL Class A glass volumetric flask partially filled with 50% methanol / 50% ammonium acetate buffer reagent. Bring to volume with 50% methanol/ 50% ammonium acetate buffer reagent. Ampulate in an amber glass autosampler vial. + Place the test substance in water sample beaker on a hotplate and bring solution to a boil. After approximately 10 mLs (5%)ofwater has evaporated, remove beaker from hotplate and cool to room temperature in an ice-water bath. Transfer contentsof sample into a `graduated cylinder and record actual volume. + Process a 250 uL aliquotof sample as described above for solvent blank and control samples. + Retum sample to original beaker and bring sample to boil Repeat steps 6-8 until sample has evaporated to 100 mLs. Submit all ampulated samples for LCMS analysis.
Dre IttAssn Reon FOS ppenic
Is
000091
RESULTS KTeimpe0rature C: Not recorded. Remarks: *Don Mackay provided the following interpretationofthe analytical results: "As interpret the lab results they established an initial concentrationof 50 mg/L in 200 mL. water then distilled off 10 mL aliquots and analyzed the residue. They then calculated the percentage of the original test substance present which remained in the beaker unevaporated. These `percentage recoveries'; ranged from 136 to 105 with no real trend. I conclude that the f`emsetassuurbisntganlcoewdaiidrn-owtateevrappaorrtaitteiotnocoaenfyfimceieanstus.rabIlt ecaenxtbenet.shTohwins tihsaat ivfewryatseernsaintdivtehmeestohluotdeof evaporate equally (e.g, the contents do not change in composition as would occur with an azeotrope) then K,,, or H is identical for water and the solute. For water,H is approximately 2400 Pa (approximately 20C) divided by 55000 mol/m' or 0.044 Pa m/mol or a K,, of about 2 x 10. The test substance must thus have a K,, considerably less than this, i.c. less than 2 x 10. Its thus essentially non-volatile from aqueous solution. This is probably becauseofits ionic nature. The simple expedient is to assign it a K,,, of zero, i.e. is a type 2 involatile chemical in our nomenclature." DATA QUALITY Reliability: Klimisch ranking 2. Data has limited reliability. Sample purity was not noted. Study temperature was not recorded. CONCLUSIONS `Testing indicates this substance is essentially non-volatile from aqueous solution. Submitter: 3M Company, Environmental Laboratory
P.O. Box 33331 St. Paul, MN 55133 REFERENCES Study conducted at the request of 3M Company by Wildlife Intemational, Ltd. ofEaston, Maryland. Study review by Don MackayofD. Mackay Environmental Research Limited, OTHER Last changed: 5/1/00
Of niatscssmenRepo FOS-Append
19
000092
WATER SOLUBILITY (Reference No. 60)
TEST SUBSTANCE
Identity: Perfluorooctanesulfonate; may also be referred to as PFOS or FC-95. (1Octanesulfonic acid, 1,1,2.2,3,3,4,4,5,5,6,6,7,7,8,8,8-heptadecafluoro-, potassium salt, CAS # 2795-39-3) Remarks: The test substance is a white powder. Sample was taken from 3M lot number 217. Sample was stored under ambient conditions prior to testing. Purity determined to be 90.49% by LC/MS, 'H-HMR, "F-NMR and elemental analyses techniques.
METHOD
Method: OECD 105, OPPTS 830.7840, and 40 CFR 796.1840. GLP (VIN): Yes Year completed: Study completed 1999. Report completed 2000 Remarks: The definitive test consistedofequilibrationof an excess amountoftest substance with NANOpure water at 30C followed by equilibration at 20C and analyzing subsamples by high performance liquid chromatography with mass spectrometric detection (LCMS).
NANOpure water is equivalent to ASTM Type Il Designation D1193-91.
RESULTS
Value (mg/L) at temperature C: 519 mg/L at 20+ 0.5C. Descriptionof solubility: Slightly soluble. Remarks: Triplicate subsamples were removed from the appropriate bottles afte one, two and three daysof shaking in a water bath maintained at 30 1.0C and following one day of a 20 + 0.5C equilibration period. Analysis of aqueous subsamples after one day had a mean analytical result of 459 mg/L (SD = 8.96, CV = 1.95%). For subsamples collected afer two and three days, the mean concentration were 537 mg/L (SD = 27.6, CV = 5.14%) and 501 mg/L (SD = 64.2, CV. = 12.8%), respectively.
CONCLUSIONS
`The Day 2 and Day 3 mean solubility concentration were within 15%ofeach other and were averaged to obtain the overall mean Solubility concentration. The overall mean solubility concentration of the test substance in NANOpure water was 519 mg/L (SD = 48.3; CV = 9.31%; N=6).
Submitter: 3M Company, Environmental Laboratory, P.0. Box 33331, St. Paul, Minnesota, 55133
DATA QUALITY rf niatsssmenReporPFO Append
Lo
000093
Reliability: Klimisch ranking 1.
REFERENCES
Study conducted at the request of 3M Maryland.
Company by Wildlife
Intemational,
Ltd.ofEaston,
OTHER
Last changed: 5/3/00
rot niaAscssmen Repor PFO pend1
Lt
000094
Reference 71 Reference 73 Reference 75 Reference 77 Reference 78 Reference 79 Reference 80 Reference 84 Reference 86 Reference 87 Reference 90 Reference 93 Reference 184 Reference 185 Reference 503 Reference 504
APPENDIX IT SUMMARY FOR AQUATIC TOXICOLOGY STUDIES (PNECs)
CONTENTS
Acute Toxicity to Fish, 1999
Acute Toxicity to Aquatic Invertebrates (e.g. Daphnia), 1999
Acute Acute
Toxicity Toxicity
to to
Aquatic Invertebrates (Freshwater the Saltwater Mysid, 1999
Mussel),
1999
Chronic Toxicity to Early life Stage of Fish, 1999
Chronic Chronic
Toxicity Toxicity
to to
Freshwater Invertebrates the Saltwater Mysid, 1999
(Daphnia
Magna),
1999
Chronic Toxicity to Early Life Stage of Fish, 1978
Acute Toxicity to Fish, 1994
Acute Toxicity to Aquatic Invertebrates (e.g. Daphnia), 1994
Acute Toxicity to Fish, 1979
Acute Toxicity to Aquatic Invertebrates (e.g. Daphnia), 1991
Acute Toxicity to Fish, 1974
Acute Toxicity to Fish, 1974
Acute Toxicity to Fish, 1996
Acute Toxicity to Aquatic Invertebrates (c.g. Daphnia), 1996
Dra itl sessReport PROS Atchmens
wm
000095
ACUTE TOXICITY TO FISH (Reference No. 71)
TEST SUBSTANCE
OIdcetnatnietsyu:lfPoenrifcluaocirdo,oc1t,a1n,e2s.u2l,f3o,n3a,t4e4;,5m,5a,y6.a6l,s7o,7b,e8.r8e,f8e-rhreepdtatdoeacsafPlFuoOroS-,orpoFtC-a9s5s.ium(Is-alt, CAS # 2795-39-3) R3eMmalrotksn:umbTehre2t1e7st. sSubasmtpalnecewiassaswthoirtede upnodwdeerra.mbiSeanmtplceonwdaitsiotnaskepnriforrotmo testing. Purity determined to be 90.49% by LC/MS, 'H-HMR, "F-NMR and clemental analyses techniques.
METHOD
Method: OECD 203 and OPPTS 850.1075
Type: Static acute
GLP: Yes
Year completed: Study completed 1999. Report completed 2000
Species: Pimephales promelas
Supplier: Analytical
In-house cultures, Wildlife International, Lid., Easton, monitoring: PFOS measured at 0, 48, 96-hours
MD
Exposure period: 96-hours
aStnaatliysstiisc,amlomveitnhgodasv:eraLgCe,,mevtahluoedsocralbciunloamteida,lwphroebnabpiolsistiyblwei,thbynopnr-olbiintear interpolation using the
computer software of C.E. Stephan.
Test fish age: Approximately 126 days old
Length and weight: 35 (30-38) mm, 0.36 (0.21-0.49) g
Loading: 0.24 g fish/L.
Pretreatment: None
Test Conditions
Dilution water: 0.45 mm filtered well water
Dilution water Hardness:
chemistry (during the 131 (128-136) mg/L as
4-week CaCO,
period
immediately
preceding
the
test):
Alkalinity: 177 (176mg-/L1as7C8aC)O3
PH: 83
TOC: <1.0mgL
Conductivity: 311 (310-315) mmhos/cm
`Smtioxcekd afonrd~t2e2sthsooulrustiporinoprrteopuasrea.tiAofnt:erPmriixmianrgy,sptroicmkarpyresptaorcekdsionluditliuotniwonaswaptreorpoartt2i7onmalgl/yL and
diluted with dilution water to prepare the four additional test concentrations.
Concentrations dosing rate: Once
SEtxapboilsiutryoefvetshseeltse:st2c5hLempioclyaeltshoylluetnieonasq:uarEixatrceomnetaliynsitnagblaepproximately 15Lof test solution;
water depth approximately 17.6 cm.
Dra iilAssent ReportPROS - tckment 1
2
000096
Number of replicates: two Number of fish per replicate: ten Numberof concentrations: five plus a negative control Water chemistry during the study:
Dissolved oxygen range (0 - 96 hours): 7.8 8.8 mg/L (control exposure) 7.7-9.0mg/L (28 mg/L exposure)
PH range (0-96 hours) 8.3-8.6 (control exposure) 84-85 (28 mg/L exposure)
Test temperature range (0 - 96 hours) 20.4-22.10C (control exposure) 21.3-22.30C (28 mg/L exposure)
Method of calculating mean measured concentrations: arithmetic mean
RESULTS
MNoemaisnuarledcocnocnecnetnrtartaitoinosn:s:Bk<LcOonQt,rol3,.3,3.56,.65,.99.,59,.91,7,126,82m7g/mgL/L
Element value: 24-hour LC,, = > 28 mg/L (C.L not calculable)
48-hour LC, = > 28 72-hour LC, =27 (22 -
4m1g)/Lmg(/C.LL.
not
calculable)
96-hour LC,=9.5 (8.0 11) mg/L
All clement values based Statistical evaluation of
on mean measured concentrations mortality: Confidence limits for
24
and
48-hours
could
not
be
ccoanlcceunlattreadtidoun-eeftofelcatckroelfatmioorntsahliiptyw.asThneot7d2e-mhoonusrtLrCat,e,dvoavleuer ias rqeuaessotniaobnlaeblreanbgeecoaufspeeracent dead.
c`aTlhceu2l4ataentdhe487-2h-ohuorurLLCC,,yvaanludesMowveirengdeAtveerrmaigneedfobrytvhies9u6al-hionuterrpLreCta,tion. Probit was used to
LAtnda.lyutsiicnaglhmiegthhpoedrofloorgmya:nceAnlailqyuisdescohfrtoemsattosgolruatpihoynswiwtehremapsesrfsopremcetdroamtetWriilcdldiefteeIctnitoenmational
s(HaPmLeCa/nMdS)m.ostWhpreonmidneetnertmpienaikngretshepocnosnecefnotrrpaetrifolnuoofrotohcetatensetsuslufbosntaatnecewainstuhseedt.estNsooluattitoenmsp,ttwhaes
qmuaadnteittaotqiuoan)ntwiafyso0n.4t5h8e mbags/iLsoifn itnhidsivsitduudayl. iTshomeermiecacnopmeprocneennttrse.coTvhereyoLfOmQat(rliimxitfoorftifications
maneaalsyuzreeddcvoanlcuuersrefnrtolmy 8d5u.3rin1g0s1a1m7pl%eofannaolmyisniaslw.asMe97a.s9u.rSeadmvpalleusescoflolrecstaemdplatestetstakiennitaitat4i8on-hhoaudrs
ranged from 86.3 to 101%of nominal. from 87.6 t0 98.3% of nominal
Measured
values
for samples
taken
at
96-hours
ranged
Cr --
ws
000097
`Summaryofanalytical chemistry data:
EN
I iii Conenraion 0, 48, and 96-hours,
'
Negative
[|ARlels<peLct0ivQely, mg/L
(Control
5.13
55
56.0555,507, 5.45, 589,570,
99
50..5929,9.47,0.85,9.33,9.70,
182,193, 162
150,156,148,
27
228656.285.270.278, 368,
Tw
Concenteaton (0
mg/L
;
Loa
[56
95
[17
106
cBoinocleongtircaatlioobnsaeprpveaatrieodnsnoarfmtaelr.9S6-ohmoeurosr:alFliosfhtihnetshuernveigvaitnigvfeischonwterroel oabnsdetrhveed3.t3ombge/sLweixmpmoisnurge erratically (4/16 in 5.6 mg/L exposure, 10/10in 9.5 mg/L, 4/4 in 17 mg/L) at test termination. Cumulative percent mortality:
Mean Measured
[mTesgt Concentration ~~ 24-hours [48-hours |72-hours
Neg. Control
op To Jo To
po p jo
ps
loope
ps
fJ o ose
sf
Bo fo fw]
MLoorwteasltitcyoonfcecnotnrtartoilosn: cNaounsieng 100% mortality: 28 mg/L
[--------
I"
000098
CONCLUSIONS
9`T.h5empgo/tLaswsiituhmape9r5fl%uocroonofcitdaennecseulifnotneartvael9o6-fho8u.0r~1L1 Cmgf/oLr.faTthheead96m-ihnounrownowmaosrtdaeltietrymainndedntoo be effects concentration was 3.3 mg/L.
`Submitter: 3M Company, Environmental Laboratory P.0. Box 33331 St. Paul, MN 55133
DATA QUALITY
Reliability: Klimisch rankin=g 1
REFERENCES
`This study Company.
was
conducted
at
Wildlife
Intemational
Ltd.
Easton,
MD
at
the
request
of
the
3M
OTHER
Last changed: 5/3/00
ra ilAssetReon FOS-chen 1
ns
000099
ACUTE TOXICITY TO AQUATIC INVERTEBRATES (E.G., DAPHNIA) (Reference No. 73)
TEST SUBSTANCE
Identity: Perfluorooctanesulfonate; may also be referred to as PFOS or FC-95. (Octanesulfonic acid, 1,1,2,2,3,3,4,4,5,5,6,6,7,7,8,8,8-heptadecafluoro-, potassium salt, CAS # 2795-39-3)
RSaemmpalreksw:asTshteorteedstusnudbesrtaanmcbeieins tacwohnidtietipoonwsdeprr.iotSoramtpelsteinwga. sPutraikteyndfertoemrm3iMnelottonbuemb9e0r.42917%. by LC/MS, 'H-HMR, "F-NMR and elemental analyses techniques.
METHOD
TGMeeLstPth:otdy:Ypee:sOSEtaCtDic 2a0c2utaend OPPTS 850.1010
Year completed: Study completed 1999. Report completed 2000 Species: Daphnia magna
Analytical monitoring: PFOS measured at 0, 24, 48-hours
Santaaltyissitsi,camlomveitnhgodasv:eraEgCe,mevtalhuoeds
calculated,
or binomial
when possible, byprobit
probability with non-linear
interpolation
using
the
computer software of C.E. Stephan.
Test conditions Test daphnid source: Obtained from cultures maintained by Wildlife International Ltd., Easton,
MD. Identificationof the original brood stock was verified by the `AcademyofNatural Sciences, Philadelphia, PA.
Test daphnid age at study initiation: <24-hours
Dilution
Dilution
water:
water
0.45 mm
chemistry
filtered well
(during the
water
4-week
period
immediately
preceding
the
test):
Hardness: 132 (128-136) mg/L as CaCO,
Alkalinity: PH:
178 (176-178) mg/L as CaCO3 83(8.2-8.3)
TOC:
<1.0mgL
Conductivity: 313 (310-315) mmhos/cm
Ca/Mg ratio: 35/13.5
Irate 8A us Na/K ratio: 21.3/6.62
Lighting: Colortone 50 fluorescent lights, intensity approximately 359 lux. Photoperiod of
16-hours light,
Stock and test
8s-ohlouutirosndsarpkrewpiatrhatai3o0n-:miAnuptreimtraarnysisttioocnpkesroiloudt.ion
was
prepared
in
dilution
water
at91 mg/L. It proportionally
was mixedfor ~19.5 diluted with dilution
hours prior to use. Afier waterto prepare the four
mixing, the primary stock was additional test concentrations.
All
tEexspt ossoluurteiovnesssaeplsp:ear2e5d0cmleLarpalnasdticcolboerlaeksesr.s containing 240 mLof test solution. The approximate
depthof test solution was 6.4 cm.
Number of replicates: two
g he
600100
Number of daphnids per replicate: ten Numberof concentrations: five plus a negative control
Dr nilAssent ReportPROS che
wr
000101
Water chemistry during the study: Dissolved oxygen range (0 - 48 hours): 8.68.9 mg/L (control exposure) 86-91 mg/L (91 mL exposure) PH range (0 - 48 hours) 82-85 (control exposure) 8.58.6 (91 mg/L exposure)
`Test temperature range (0 -- 48 hours) 19.5-20.201C (control exposure) 193-20.19C (91 mg/L exposure)
Element basis: mortality and immobilization Method of calculating mean measured concentrations: arithmetic mean
RESULTS
Nominal concentrations: Bk control, 12, 20, 33, 55, 91 mg/L
Measured concentrations: <LOQ, 11, 20,33, 56,91 Element value: 24-hour EC,, = 82 (81-83) mg/L
mg/L
24-hour EC,, =>91 mg/L (C.L. not calculable)
24-hour EC, =>91 mg/L (C.1 not calculable)
48-hour EC,, = 53 (<11->91) mg/L
48-hECoy,u=6r1 (33-91) mg/L
48-hour EC,y= 63 (<11->91) mg/L.
All clement values based on mean measured concentrations
Sptoastsiisbtliecablyepvraolbuiattainoanl:ysiTsh,etEheC,m,ovvailnugesavaenrda9ge5m%ectohnofdidoernbcienionmtiearlvaplrsowbeabrielictaylcwuiltahtendonw-hleinnear
cianltceurploaltaetdiwonheusninpgostshieblceomupsiuntgerthseofBtrwuacree-oVferCs.tEe.egStmeepthhaon.d TbehceaEusCe,,tahnerdeEwCe,r,evlaelsusetshwaenrtewo
concentrations with partial mortality or immobility.
ALinda.lyutsiicnaglhmieghthpoedrofloorgmya:nceAnlailquyisdescohrfotmesattosgorluatpihoynswiwtehremapsesrfsopremcetdroamtetWriilcdldiefteecItnitoenmational
s(aHmPeLCa/nMdS)m.ostWhperonmidneetnetrmpienaikngrethsepocnosnecefnotrrpaetrifolnouofrotohcetatensetsuslufbosntaatnecewainstuhseedt.estNsoolauttitoenmsp,ttwhea.s
qmuaadnteittaotqiuoann)twiafys o4n.5t8hemgba/sLisoinfithnidsisvtiudduya.l Tihseommeeriacncpoemrpcoennetnrtesc.ovTehreyoLfmOaQtr(ilixmiftorotfifications
maneaalsyuzreeddcvoanlcuuersrefnrtolmy 8d5u.r5intgo s1a1m2p%leoafnnaolmyisniaslw.asMe96a.s2.urSeadmvpalleusescoflolrecstaemdplatestetstakiennitaitat2i4on-hhoaudrs
ranged from 92.2 to 115% of nominal. from 91.6 to 106% of nominal.
Measured
values
for samples taken at 48-hours ranged
raf nial sscssmens Repos PROS-Aackmes 1
us
0001.02
Summary of analytical chemistry data:
CNoonmciennatlraTteisot
Measured |0, 24, and
Duplicated 48-hours,
Values
at
M|CeMoa%ns"ounredto|P[Noeoftmiiannatl
nmgL |Respectively, mel
one
|
Negaive |All <L0Q Control
<LoQ
110250,106,115, 125, 109,
117823,181,228,21.6.214,
3
330420,341,340,36.1,313, [53
5s
S560.54,499,57.0,630,565, [56
mBigo/lLogtirceaaltmoebnstesrvaaptpieoanrsedafhteearlt4h8y-haonudrsn:orDmaaphtnhirdosugihnouthtetnheegtaetsitvweictohnntorom,ortthaeli1t1y,anidmmtohbei2l0ity coorntorvoelr.t cTlhineiceaflfescitgsnsnootfedtoxiinctihtiys. sFtiuvdeypwerecreentmomrotratlailtiy;tynwoaismmoobbsielrivzeadtiaton48w-ahsounrosteidn attheanneygatetsitve concenration.
Cumulative percent mortality:
MMeeaasnured Test
Cmogn/cLenation|4-10urs |48-hours
Negative Control
5
[pe Pp o e
Jo po fJ e os
Dr iiAssn opr FOS tachment 1
wo
000103
Control response: satisfactory
CONCLUSIONS
6T1hemgpo/tLaswsiituhmap9er5f%lucoornofoicdteannceseuilnftoenravtael 4o8f-3h3o-u9r1EmgC/SL.foTrhDeap4h8n-hioaumrangonimamowbaislidzeatteiromninaenddtnoobe observed effect concentration was 33 mg/L.
Submitter: 3M Company, Environmental Laboratory P.O. Box 33331 St. Paul, MN 55133
DATA QUALITY
Reliability: Klimisch ranking |
REFERENCES
`This study Company.
was
conducted
at
Wildlife
Intemational,
Ltd.
Easton,
MD
at
the
requestof
the
3M
OTHER
Last changed: 5/3/00
raf nia AsscssmenReposPFS Atachmen 1
wo
000104
ACUTE TOXICITY (Reference No. 75)
TO
AQUATIC
INVERTEBRATES
(FRESHWATER
MUSSEL)
TEST SUBSTANCE
OIcdetnatnietsy:ulfPoenrifcluacoirdo,oc1t,a1n,e2s,u2l,f3o,n3.a4t.e4;,5m,a5,y6,a6l,s7o,b7,e8,r8e,f8e-rhreepdttaodeacsafPlFuoOrSo-,orpoFtCa-s9s5i.um(Is-alt, CAS # 2795-393) SReammaprlkesw:asTshteorteedstusnudbesrtaanmcbeieinsta cwohnidtietipoonwsdperri.ortSoamtpelsteinwg.asPutraikteyndfertoemrm3inMedlottonbuemb9e0r.4291%7.by LC/MS, 'H-HMR, "F-NMR and elemental analyses techniques.
METHOD
EMnevtihroodn:menTthaelsPtruodtyecwtaisoncAongdeuncctyedSeursiiensg8a50pr~otEoccoollogbiacsaeld EofnfepcrtoscGeudiudreelsionuetsl,iOnePdPiTnSU.NS.umber
G85u0i.d1e0f7o5r ;CoOnEduCcDti2n0g3:ToxFiicsiht,yATceusttes wTiotxhicFiitsyheTse,st;MaacnrdoiAnSveTrMtebSrtaatnedsaradnEd7A2m9p-h8i8bai,anSst.andard
Test type: Semi-static Renewal
GLP: Yes
Year completed: Study completed 1999. Species: Unio complamatus
Report completed 2000
Analytical Statistical
monitoring: Test substance concentrations measured by LCMS methods: LC,, values calculated, when possible, by probit
at
0,
48,
96-hours
analysis, moving average computer softwareofC_E.
method or Stephan.
binomial
probability
with
non-linear
interpolation
using
the
`Test organism source: Obtained Carolina. Carolina collected from
from Carolina the wild.
Biological
Supply
Company,
Burlington,
North
`Test organism age at study initiation: Unknown
Test Conditions
Dilution water: 0.45 mm filtered well water
Dilution water Hardness:
chemistry (during the 126 (120-132) mg/L
4-week period as CaCO,
immediately
preceding
the
test):
Alkalinity: 174 (170-178) mg/L as CaCO3
pH.
83 (8.18.5)
TOC: <1.0mgL
Conductivity: 321 (310-330) mmhos/em
CaMg ratio: 35/13.5
Na/K ratio: 21.36.62
Lighting: Colortone 16-hours light, 8-hours
50 fluorescent lights, intensity approximately dark with a 30-minute transition period.
369
lux.
Photoperiod of
aStt9o1ckmga/nLd.teIsttwsaoslumtiioxnesdpfroerpaapraptriooxni:matAelpyr2i4mahroyursstopcrkiosroltuotuisoen. waAfsiperrempiaxriendg,intdhielputriiomnawrayter
csotnocceknwtraastipornosp.ortAlilontaelsltysdoilluuttieodnswiatphpedairleudticolnewarataenrdtcoolporrelpeassr.e the four additional test
DrInitAssent par PFOS sche 1
wn
000105
Exposure vessels: 25 liter polyethylene aquaria `The approximate depthoftest solution was 23.2
containing cm.
approximately
20
L
of
test
solution.
Number of replicates: two
Number of test organisms per replicate: ten
Number of concentrations: five plus a negative control
`Water chemistry during the study:
Dissolved oxygen range (0 96 hours):
5.88.5 mg/L (control exposure)
5.0-8.6 mg/L (79 mg/L exposure)
`pH range (0-96 hours)
8.0-8.4 (control exposure)
Test tem7p.er9a-t8u.r5e(r7a9nmgeg/(L0 --ex9p6oshuoruer)s)
21.4-21.801C (control exposure)
21.8-23.70C (79 mg/L exposure)
wEelreemecnontsBiadseirse:d dMeoardt.aliTthye. nMuumsbseerlsofwiitnhdiovpiednuaslhselelxshiabnidtinnogtclrieniscpalonsidgintnsoogftgeonxtilceiptryoodrding
abnormal behavior also were evaluated.
Methodofcalculating mean measured concentrations:
arithmetic mean
RESULTS
Nominal concentrations: <LOQ, 5.7, 11,23, 46,91 mg/L
EMleeamseunrtevdalcuoen:ce9n6t-rahtoiuornsL:C,,<=LO5Q9,mg5./3L, (1521,-2608, m41g,/L7)9 mg/L
pStoastsiisbtliecablyepvraolbuiattainoanl:ysiTsh,ethLeCmSo0vvianlgueasvearnadge95m%etchoondfiodrebnicneoimnitaelrvparlosbwabeirleitcyalwciutlhatneodn-wlhienenar
interpolation using the computer software of C.E. Stephan.
LAunda.lyutsiicnaglhmieghthpoedrofloorgmya:nceAnlailquyisdeschorfotmeasttosgorluatpihoynswiwtehremapsesrfsopremcetdroamtetWriilcdldiefteecItntieornnational
s(aHmPLeCa/nMdS)m.ostWhpreonmidneetnetrmpienaikngretshepocnosnecefnotrrpaetrifolnuoorfotohcetatnesetsuslufbosntaatnecewains tuhseedt.estNsoolauttitoenmsp,t twhea.s
made to quantify quantitation) was
on the 0.115
basisofindividual mg/L in this study.
isomeric components. The LOQ (limit of The mean percent recoveryofmatrix fortifications
maneaalsyuzreeddcvoanlcuuersrefnrtolmy 7du3r.i7n%g 1s0a9mp6l.e0%anoaflynsoimsinwaals. 94M.e7a%s.urSeadmpvlaelsuecsolflorecstaemdpaltetsesttaikneintiaatti4o8n-had
hours ranged from 81.2 t0 98.9%of nominal. ranged from 88.5 to 130%of nominal.
Measured
values
for
samples
taken
at
96-hours
rat ninsss Report PROS tachmen1t
ni
000106
Summary of analytical chemistry data:
[Nominal Test [Measured Duplicated Values at [Mean Measured
(Concentration |0, 48, and 96-hours, , mg/L Respectively, mg/L.
Concentration, mg/L
[Negative [AI<LOQ
[<LoQ
[Control
57
547,493,518,5.70,524, [53
526
114,101,112,105,109, [12
154
23
190,168,187,187,229, [20
224
372,406,37.1,395, 482, [40.5
(69.0,74.7,813,77.6,882, [19 85.7
[Percent [of [Nominal 93 87 87
mBigo/lLogtirceaaltmoebnstesrvaaptpieoanrsedafhteearlt9h6y-haonudrsn:ormMaulsstehlrsouignhtohuetntehgeatteisvtewciotnhtrnool,mtohreta5l.i3t,y1o2raonvdertthe 20 tclrienaitcmaelnstigannsdof9t0ox%icmiotryt.alFiitvyewpaesrcoebnstemrovretdaliintythwea7s9ombgse/rLvetrdeaattm9e6nt-.houNros ianbnthoerm4a1lmbge/hLa.vior was noted in these concentrations. Cumulative percent mortality:
[Mean Measured
Test Concentration mg/L
[24 Hours
[48 Hours
|72 Hours
[96 Hours
Negative Control
ps
po
he
[P b i fen b we]
Control response: Satisfactory
Dr ni sRes posPFOS n Auschmens1
wn
000107
CONCLUSIONS c`Tohmepploatmaastsuisumwapesrdfleutoerromoicnteadnetsoulbfeo5na9tmeg9/6L-hwoiutrhLaC9S50%focrontfheidFernecsehwinatteerrvaMluosfse5l1,-6U8nimog/L. The 96-hour no mortality concentration was 20 mg/L. Submitter: 3M Corporation, Environmental Laboratory
P.0. Box 33331 St. Paul, MN 55133 DATA QUALITY Reliability: Klimisch ranking | REFERENCES `This study was conducted at Wildlife International, Ltd. Easton, MD at the request of the 3M Company. OTHER Last changed: 5/3/00
--
wi
000108
ACUTE TOXICITY TO THE SALTWATER MYSID (Reference No. 77)
TEST SUBSTANCE
Identity: Perfluorooctanesulfonate; may also be referred to as PFOS or FC-95. (1Octanesulfonic acid, 1,1,2.2,3,3,4.4,5,5,6,6,7,7,8,8,8-heptadecafluoro-, potassium salt, CAS # 2795-39-3) Remarks: The test substance is a white powder. Sample was taken from 3M lot number 217. Sample was stored under ambient conditionspriorto testing. Purity determined to be 90.49% by LC/MS, 'H-HMR, "F-NMR and elemental analyses techniques.
METHOD
Method: OPPTS 850.1035
Type: Static acute
GLP: Yes
Year completed: Study completed 1999. Report completed 2000
Species: Mysidopsis bahia
Supplier: In-house cultures, Wildlife Intemational, Ltd., Easton, MD
Analytical monitoring: PFOS measured at 0, 48, 96-hours
Exposure period: 96-hours
Statistical methods: LCi, values calculated, when possible, by probit
analysis, moving average method or binomial probability with non-linear interpolation using the
computer softwareofC.E. Stephan.
Test fish age: <24-hours old
Pretreatment: None
Test Conditions
Dilution water: Natural seawater diluted to 20%, with well water, 0.45mm filtered.
Dilution water chemistry (during the 4-week period immediately preceding the test):
Salinity: 20 (20-20)
pH: 82(81-82)
TOC: <10mglL
Stock and test solution preparation: Primary stock prepared at 8.2 mg/L and mixed for ~22
hours prior to use. After mixing, primary stock solution was proportionally diluted with dilution
water to prepare the four additional test concentrations. Al test solutions appeared clear and
colorless.
Concentrations dosing rate: Once
Stability of the test chemical solutions: Extremely stable:
Exposure vessels: 2L polyethylene aquaria containing approximately 1000mL of test solution;
water depth approximately 6.6 cm.
Number of replicates: two
Number of mysids per replicate: ten
Numberof concentrations: five plus a negative control
Feeding: Live brine shrimp nauplii daily
Water chemistry during the study:
rat niaAsssmns Repors PFOS-rach 1
was
000109
Dissolved oxygen range (0 96 hours): 6.87.4 mg/L (control exposure) 6.87.3 mg/L (5.4 mg/L exposure)
pH range (0-96 hours) 8.18.2 (control exposure) 8.1-82 (5.4 mg/L exposure)
Drath nt scssmes Repos PRtaOchmSent 1
i
000110
`Test 2te4m2p-e2r5at.u4r0eCra(ncgonetr(o0l--e9x6pohsouurres)) 23.8-24.50C (5.4 mg/L exposure)
Methodofcalculating mean measured concentrations: arithmetic mean RESULTS
NMoemaisnuarledcocnocnecnetnrtartaitoinosn:s:B<kLcOonQt,ro0l.,571.,1,1.11.,8,193.,0,3.40.,9,5.84.2mgm/g/LL Element val4u8e-:ho2u4r-hLoCur,L=C>,5=.4>m5g./4LmgC./L.Ln(oCtIcnaoltcuclaalbcluel)able)
72-hour LC,y = 4.4 (3.6-6.2) mg/L All element v9a6l-uheosurbaLsCe,dyo=n3m.e6a(n3.0m-e4a.s6u)rmegd/cLoncentrations
Setxaptoissutricealdueevtaolutahteiolnacokfomnoratnaaldietyq:uatLeC,c,onvcaelnutersatcioounl-drneostpobnesecaplatctuelrant.edTfhoer 2p4roabintdm4e8t-hhooudrswaosf
used to evaluate mortality Analytical methodology:
at 72 and 96 hours Analysesoftest solutions
were
performed
at
Wildlife
International
(LtHdP.LuCs/iMnSg)h.igWhhpeenrfdoertmearnmcienilniqgutihdecchornocmeanttoragtriaopnhoyfwtihteh
mass spectrometric test substance in the
detection test solutions,
the
smaamdee atnodqumaonsttifpyroonmitnheenbtaspiesakofreinsdpiovnisdeuaflorispoemrefrliucorcooomcptoanneenstusl.fonTahteewLaOsQus(eldi.mitNoofattempt was
qaunaanltyizteadticoonn)cwurarsen0t.l1y15dumrgi/ngL sian mtphlisesatnuadly.ysiTshweasme9a7.n4.peSracmepntlerseccoovlelreycotefdmaatttreistx ifnoirttiiaftiicoantihoands
mraenagseudrefdrovmal4u3e.s5ftroo7m15.20.%4otfo 7no0m.i7n%aol.f Mneomaisnuarle.d Mvaelauseusrfeodr vsaalmupelsesfotraskaemnpalte9s6t-ahkoeunrsatr4a8n-gheodurs
from 35.5 10 71.1% ofnominal
raf ninsess Report PFOS -Aachen 1
wr
000111
Summaryof analytical chemistry data:
Nominal Test
(Concentrato. |Measured Duplicate Values at 0,48,
Men ed
[#407
n
and 96-Hours, Respectively, mg/L~ [
mel
mL
Negative [AlI<LOQ Control
[<Loq
0.575,0.622, 0.605, 0.640, 0.391, 0.580
[0.57
[Ls Treawiorone ns Jo
192,199,192, 191,179,190 [Lo
[[93052662963331030 bo
[82 [582,578.358,585,522, 5.86 [4
percent of 0 [Nominal
52 ja |
Je |
Ja |
Jes |
mBigo/lLog(imcaelanobmseearsvuarteidoncsonacfetnetrr9at6i-ohnosu)rst:reaMtymseindtsgrionutphse anpepgeatairveedcnoonrtrmoall,aannddhtehael0t.h5y7daunridng1.1the test.
Cumulative percent mortality:
Mean Measured CoJneceentration mg/L Negative Control
24-hours |48-hours|72-houurs
fh
fo hhho] po FE ew
be Iss fos |
Mortality of controls: None
Tr --
is
000112
CONCLUSIONS
The potassium 3.6 mg/L with
perfluorooctanesulfonate 96-hour a 95% confidence interval of 3.0 ~
L4.C6,mfgo/rL.saltTwhaete9r6m-yhsoiudrsnowamsordteatleitrymiannedd
to
be
NOEC concentration was 1.1 mg/L.
Submitter: 3M Company, P.O. Box 33331
Environmental
Laboratory
St. Paul, MN 55133
DATA QUALITY
Reliability: Klimisch rankin=g 1
REFERENCES
CThoimspsatnuydy was conducted at Wildlife International Ltd., Easton, MD at the requestofthe 3M
OTHER
Last changed: 5/3/00
Dr ntsscsRmepeo PnROsS. Asch1e
ni
000113
CHRONIC TOXICITY TO EARLY LIFE STAGE OFFISH (Reference No. 78)
TEST SUBSTANCE
Identity: Perfluorooctanesulfonate; `may also be referred to as PFOS or FC-95. QaOctanesulfonic acid, 1,1,2.2.3,3,4,4,5,5,6,6,7,7.8,8,8-heptadecafluoro-, potassium salt, CAS # 2795-393)
Remarks: The test substance is a white powder. Sample was taken from 3M lot number 217.
Sample was stored under ambient conditions prior to testing. Purity determined to be 90.49%by LC/MS, 'H-HMR, "F-NMR and elemental analyses techniques. METHOD
Method: OECD 210, OPPTS 850.1400
Type: Flow-through chronic
GLP: Yes
Year completed: Study completed 1999. Report completed 2000 Species: Pimephales promelas
Exposure period: 47 days Supplier:
Analytical
In-house cultures, Wildlife International, Ltd.,
monitoring: PFOS measured on days 0,4, 7,
Easton,
14, 21,
MD
28, 35,
42,
and
47
Pretreatment: None iStdaetnitsitfiyctalremaetmtehnotdsgr:ouDpissctrheatte-svhaorwieabdlea dsattataiswteircaellaynsailgynziefdicuanstidni2fgfeXre2ncceo(npt<i0n.g0e5n)cyfrtaobmletsheto
negative control group. All continuous-variable data were evaluated for normality using
`Shapiro-Wilk's test and for homogeneityof variance using Bartlett test. Analysis of variance
and Dunnett's
Test fish age:
test were used to
eggs < 24-hours
evaluate differences
old at test initiation
between
treatment
and
control
means.
Test Conditions
Dilution water: 0.45 mm filtered well water
Dilution water chemistry (during the 4-week period immediately preceding the test): Hardness: 126 (124-128) mg/L as CaCO, Alkalinity: 172 (170-172) mg/L as CaCO3
pH:
82 (82-83)
TOC:
<1.0mg/lL
Conductivit3y2:1 (315-330) mmhos/cm
Stock and test solution preparation: Primary stock prepared in dilution water at 88.4 mg/L `asnodlumtiioxnewdasuntpirlopalolrttiesotnaslulbystdainlcuteeddiwsistohlvdeidluptriioonr wtaotuesre.toApfrteepramriexfiinvge,adtdhietpironiamlarsytosctkocskolutions tathrceoentcoenftoruartidoanyssodfur44i.n2g,t2h2e.1te,st.11.T0,he5.s5i2x,satnodck2s.w76ermeg/iLnj.ecSttedocikntsootlhuteidoinlsutweerrmeipxrienpgarcehdamebveerrys
(at arate of 6.0 mL/minute) where they were mixed with dilution water (atarate of 116 mL/minute) to achieve the desired test concentrations. Flow through rate: Approximately six volume additionsoftest water every 24-hours
oo
"
"000114
SEtxapboilsiutryeofvetshseeltse:st9cLheglmaiscsalaqsuoalruitaiofinlsl:ed
Extremely stable with approximately
7
Loftest
solution
with
a
depth
of
aapppprrooxxiimmaatteellyy 5107 cmmm. iEnmdbiraymeoteinrcwuibtahti4o2n5cmupms wneyrleoncosncsrtereunctmeedshfraotmtagclhaesds ctoyltihnedebrosttom with
silicone attached
steoalaanrto.ckTerhaercmupwsitwheraersecuisppreoncdaetdinignmtohteiwoantoefrapcporlouxminmoafteclaych2OrLpmg.lass
aquarium
and
Number of replicates: four
NNuummbbeerr ooff fciosnhcepnetrraretpiloincsat:e:sixtwpelunstya negative control
dFaeeydsi8ngt;hroLuigvhe4b0ripnoesst-hhraitmcph,nafuepdli3i.tiFmeesd d3aitliymeosnpewreedkadyaydusrainndg t2hetifmiersstd7aidlayysonpowsete-kheatncdhs.. On
Not fed for at least 48 weight measurements.
hours
priotro
the
terminationoftest
to
allow
for
gut
clearance
prior
to
`Water chemistry during the study:
Diss7o.lv6e8d.o2xmygge/nL r(caonngtero(l0exp4o7sudaryes)):
pH 7ra.n6g8e.(20m-g4/7Lda(1y.2sm) g/L exposure)
8.0-8.4 (control exposure)
`Test
8.0-8.4 temperature
(1.2 mg/L exposure) range (0 - 47 days)
24.4-24.70C (control exposure)
Meth2o4d.o3f-c2al4c.u7l0aCti(n1g.2mmega/nLmeexapossuurreed) concentrations: arithmetic mean
RESULTS
NMoemaisnuarledcocnocnecnetnrtartaitoinosn:s:Bk<LcOonQt,rol0,.105.,104.,300.,290,.600.,571,.2,1.21,4,2.43.,64.m6g/mLg./L Element value: 5-day hatchability NOEC = 4.6 mg/L
4422--ddaayy ppoosstt--hhaattcchh sgurrovwitvhalNNOOEECC==00..3300mmgg//LL All eleme4n2t-dvaaylupeossbt-ahsaetdchonsumreviavnalmeLaOsEurCed= c0o.n6c0enmtgr/aLtions
Stotaatnisdtihciaglheervatlhuaant0i.o6n0omfgm/oLrtwalaistyn:otTehvaelsutaatteisdtidcuael dtiofafesriegnnciefifcoarntgreoffwetcht oatncsounrcveinvtarl.atiNoons equal
stteasttiesdtiwcaalslysseiegnniffoirchaanttcdhiafbfielrieyn.ce between the negative control and the highest concentration
ALntda.lyutsiicnaglhmieghthpoedrofloorgmya:nceAnlailqyuisdescohfrotmeasttosgolruatpihoynswiwtehremapsesrfsopremcetdroamtetWriilcdldiefteecItntieornnational
(sHaPmLeCa/nMdS)m.ostWhpreonmidneetnetrmpienaikngretshepocnosnecefnotrrpaetrifolnuoofrotohcettaenset ssuulbfsotnaantceewiansthuesetde.st Nsooluattitoensm,ptthweas
`qumaandteittaotqiuoann)twiafyso0n.0t4h5e8bmasgi/soLfiinndtihivsidstuuadly.isTomheerimcecaonmppoernceenntts.recTohveerLyOofQma(tlirmiixt ofofrtifications
vaenahlytzteldAcsonscnurrReontrlyFdOuri- nAgtcshmaemnpsleanalysis
was
102.
Samples
collected
at
pre-test
ranged wa
from
--
000115
91.4 to 105% of nominal. nominal. Measured values
Samples at test initiation for samples taken at test
had measured values from 95.5 to 114% of termination ranged from 95.2 to 111% of
nominal.
Draft nisial Assessment Report PR-taOchmSent 1
22 000116
Summaryofanalytical chemistry data:
Nominal Test Concentration,
[Measured Duplicate Values at 0,4, 7, 14, 21, 28, 35, 42, and 47 Days,
mg/L
Respectively, mg/L
Negative |All<LOQ
Control
0.14
0.1470,.1401,.0.11406,00.14,4,
0.148,0.134, 0.135,0.153,0.143,
0.160, 0.158,0.179, 0.160,0.147, 0.155
0.173,
0.157,
029
0287,0.277,0.270,0.289,0292,
00..239463,,00..23649,1,00.326161,,00.332057,, 00.331195,,
0.313,0.296,0276
0.57
0.571,0.576,0.619, 0.659, 0.597,
0.642, 0.539, 0.535, 0.608, 0.580,
00..567369,, 00..651475,, 00..654463, 0.644, 0.575,
114, 113,121,125,113,123,
1.03, 130,
1.10, 1.19, 1.31, 1.14,
1.24, 1.19,
1.30, 1.13,
1.31, 1.09
23
221,227,2.52,246,243,238,
fish all dead at Day 7
4.56,4.40,4.79, 479,446,476, fish all dead at Day 7
|Mean Measured |Percent
|Concentration, [of
mg/L
[Nominal
[0.15
107
[0.30
103
105
[12
|24
[4.6
100
Biological Observations 5H.atTchheirnegwseurcecensosaapnpadretnitmeditfofehraetncche:s bAeltlwveieanbltehefattihmeeadtomhiantncohwinetmhbernyeogsathiavtechceondtoronlDaanyd 4toher. PFOS treatment groups. tSouxrivciitvya.l:FiAslhl wfhisihcshudrivdivniontgstuortveisvtetgeernmeirnaaltliyonapappepaeraerdedtonobremsawliwmimtihnngoeorvreartticaslilgynsporiforsutbolethal death. sGrhoowwtehd:noFistsahtiesxtipcoaslleydstiognPiFfiOcSantatrecdounccetnitornaitniotnotsalofle0n.g1t5h,orwe0t.3w0emiggh/tLofrodrr4y2wdeaiygshtpoisnt-hatch comparison to the negative control.
Dr IkiAssent por PFS uch 1
wn
000117
Hatchability
[Mean Measured [Number
(Concentration fof Eges
[Number
Hatched,
[Number
Hatched,
[Number |Total
|Hatched, [Number
mg/L
Exposed Da3y Day 4 Day 5 Hatched
Percent
[Hatching
[Success
Negative
120
74
93
|B B f Control o o s f mfe s ] ef]|
B [e hZ s Tso or n] ]
fone
Larval Survival
Mean Measured
Percent
Concentration,
mg/L.
p p im so Negative Control
Survival,
Day 42
Pe i f]
000118
Growth
Mean Measured Concentration,
[Numberof] Total Length |Surviving Mean + SD,
Wet Weight|Dry Weight] Mean + SD, [Mea+n
mg/L
Larvae [mm
mg
sD, mg
Negative Control
26.5 +0.721 [158 +9.10 [325+ 1.20
26640208[160 +310 [333+
[030%
[werosn|iesis
0.900
[M2rzn
[00 [5[0p65:039 166:115 [5270
[2
l[a2672200 [1852338 [3545666
bo
CONCLUSIONS
fF o F]
Ffoarth4e2addamyisnpnoostw-shaetxcphosshedowteodpontoasstsaituimstipcearlfllyusoirgonoicfticaannetsurlefdouncattieonast cinontcimeenttroahtaitocnh<,sh0a.t3c0hmingg/L success, survival or growth. The most sensitive endpoint in this study was post-hatch survival,
Submitter: 3M Company, P.0. Box 33331
Environmental
Laboratory
St. Paul, MN 55133
DATA QUALITY
Reliability: Klimisch ranking = |
REFERENCES
This study Company.
was
conducted
at
Wildlife
Intemational
Lid.,
Easton, MD at the request ofthe 3M
OTHER
Last changed: 5/3/00
Or kilAsset por PFO-sche 1
nas
000119
C(RHefReOreNnIceCNToO.X79I)CITY TO FRESHWATER INVERTABRATES (Daphnia magna)
TEST SUBSTANCE
OIcdetnatnietsy:ulfPoenrifcluacoirdo,oc1t,a1n,e2s:u2l,f3o,n3,a4t:e4;,5m,a5y,6,a6l,s7o,b7,e8r,e8f,e8r-rheedpttaodcacsafPlFuoOrSo-,orpoFtCa-s9s5i.um(1s-alt, CAS # 2795-39-3) RSeammaprlkesw:asTshteorteedstusnudbesrtaanmcbeieins ta cwohnidtietipoonwsdperri.orStoamtpelsteinwga. sPutraikteyndfertoemrm3inMedlottonbuemb9e0r.42917%. by LC/MS, 'H-HMR, "F-NMR and elemental analyses techniques. METHOD
TMyepteh:odS:emOiP-SPtTaSic85L0i.f1e3-C0y0c,lOe EToCxDiciGtuyideline 21, and ASTM Standard E 1193-87.
GLP: Yes
Year completed: Study completed 1999. Species: Daphnia magna
Report completed 2000
Supplier: Analytical
In-house cultures, Wildlife International, monitoring: PFOS measured on days 0,
Ltd., Easton, MD 2, 11, 14, 18, and
21.
Exposure period: 21 days
Sltiavetiysotiucnagl manedthtohdesl:enSguthrvainvadlddraytwaewiagshteovfatluhaetesdurovnivfiinrgstf-igresnte-rgaetnieornatdiaopnhdnaipdhsn,idtsh.e nSuumrbveivraolf
ddaattaa wweerree aevnaalluyazteeddufsoirngnoFrimsahleirt'ys uesxiancgt tSehsta.piRroe-pWrioldku'cstitoesntaannddgfroorwhtohmo(lgeenngetihtaynodfvdrayriwaenicgeht)
gursoinugpsBatrhtatlewte'rsetesstt.atiAsntiaclaylslyissoifgvniafriicaanntcienacnodmpDaurninselotn'tsottehste wnaegsatuisveed ctoontirdeonlt(ipfy_t0r.e0a5t).menAtll
"stTatOisXtiScaTlAtTestRsewleearseep3e.r5f"orstmaetidstuiscialngsoaftpwearrseo.nal computer with SPSS/PC Version 2.0 or
Test organism Pretreatment:
age: < None
24-hours
old
at
test
initiation
Test Conditions
Dilution water: `microorganisms
0.45 mm filtered and fine particles
well
water
passed
through
a
UV
sterilizer
to
remove
Dilution water Hardness:
chemistry (during the 124 (120-128) mg/L as
4-week CaCO,
period
immediately
preceding
the
test):
AplHk:alinity: 82(136.90(8136)4-172) mg/L as CaCO3
TOC: <10mglL
Conductivity: Ca/Mg ratio:
329 (315-340) 35/13.5
mmhos/cm
Na/K Stock and
ratio; 213/662 test solution preparation:
Primary
stock
solution
was
prepared
in
dilution
water
at
4pr6immga/rLy.stItocwkassosltuitriroendwuanisiplroapllortteistonsaulblsytadnicleutweadswdiitshsoUlVvedstperriiolrizteod udsiel.utiAofntewratmeirxitnogp,rtehpeare
Dra nitAssertReportPFOS tachmen1t
[
000120
five additional stock solutions at test solutions appeared clear and
nominal concentrations colorless
of
1.4,
2.9,
5.7,
11,
and
23
mg/L.
All
RExepnoeswuarlervaetses:elEsv:er2y50Mo-nmdLapyl,astWiecdbneeaskedrasycaonndtaFirniidnagy.approximately 200 mL test solution. The
depth was approximately 5 cm.
Number of replicates: 10
NNuummbbeerrooff tceosntceonrtgraantiisomnss:pe6rprleupsliacanteeg:ati|ve control
cFeheodwinagt: 18E0a0cmh gtesTtScSh/aLm)baenrdw0a.s60femdL0o.3fmSeLleonfaYstCrTum(acampirxitcuorrenouftyuemas(t3,.5Cexro10p"hycleIl*l,s/amnLd) tornocuet.
daily.
sLuirgfhactei.ng:PhoCtoolpoerrtioondeof5106-flhuoourresscleignhtt,li8g-hthso.urIsntdeanrskitwyirthanage3d0-fmrionmut3e29tr-an3s8i3tiolnuxpeartitohde. water
`Water chemistry of new and Dissolved oxygen range
old (0
solutions 21 days):
during
the
study:
8.38.9 mg/L (negative control exposure)
8.3-9.0mg/L (12 mg/L exposure)
8.48.9 mg/L* (48 mg/L exposure)
PH 8r.a1n8g.e4(0-(2ne1gadtaiyvse)control exposure)
82-8.5 (12 mg/L exposure)
Test tem8p.e4rat8u.r5e% r(a48ngmeg(/0L-e2x1podsauyrse))
19.4-20.155C (negative control exposure)
19.4-20.10C (12 mg/L exposure)
19.4 19.50C* (48 mg/L exposure)
* (Measurements discontinued at Day Element basis: Survival, reproduction and
3 due to growth.
100% mortality. Effect concentrations
based
on
survival.
Methodofcalculating mean measured concentrations: arithmetic mean
RESULTS
NMoemaisnuarledcocnocnecnetnrtartaitoinosn:s:Ne<gLaOtiQv,e 1c.o5n,tr2o.l9,, 51..64,,21.29,,254.,7,4811m,g2/3,L46 mg/L Element value: 21-day NOEC = 12 mg/L
21-day LOEC = 24 mg/L 2" gener2a1t-idoanyaMcuAteTCsur=viv1a7lmNg/OLEC = 12 mg/L
All element values based on mean measured concentrations
ALtnda.lyutsiicnaglhmieghthpoedrofloorgmya:nceAnlailqyuisdescohfrtoemsattosgolruatpihoynswwitehremapsersfsopremcetdroamtetWriilcdldiefteecItnitoenmational
(sHaPmLeCa/nMdS)m.ostWhpreonmidneetnetrmpienaikngretshepocnosnecefnotrrtahteiotneostfsuthbesttaenstcesuwbasstaunsceed.inNtoheattetstemspotluwtaiosnsm,atdhee
o0fqunaintaisfy son sthReempboaessiFsnoOfSin-dAitavcihdmeuna1l
isomeric
components.
The
LOQ
(limit
of quantitation) wr
was
000121
c0o.n4c5u8rrmegn/tLlyidnutrhiinsgstsuadmy.pleThaenamlyesaisnwpraosce1d0u4r%a.l rMeecaosvuerreyodfvamlautersixoffonretiwfiscaamtpiolnessarnaanlgyezdedfrom 94 n10om1i2n1al%ovfalnueosm.inPaFl.OSMewaassusrteadblveatlhureosufgrhooumttthheeorlednseowlaultipoenrsiordas,nged from 90 to 108% of
rat niasess Report FOS-tachment 1
nas
000122
Summary of analytical chemistry data:
Nominal Tes. |Measured Duplicate Values at 0, 2,
Concentration (11, 14, 18, and 21 Days,
mg/L
Respectively, mg/L.
Negative |All<LOQ
Control
1.78,1.72, 136,132,
1.58, 1.38,
1.56, 1.43,
1.38, 1.50,
1.47, 1.45
[Mean Measured [~~]
Concentration [=e
mg/L
nal
107
29
3.20,3.05,3.01,3.07,275,2.77,
2:85,271,2.79,281, 281,282
57
5.97,5.87,565,5712,563,559, [56
5.36,5.39, 5.8, 5.75, 5.24, 5.37
11S, 115,116, 118,113, 11.3,
112,116,118, 116, 115, 113
2
242,23.1,240,246,228,225, [24
23.6, 23.1, 24.8, 25.0, all daphnids
104
dead after 18-days exposure
46
47.3, 48.0, 49.1, 49.4, all daphnids
dead after 2-days exposure
104
sNoOlTutEi:onsM)eaannd cmoerarseusrpeodndcionngceonltdrastoiluotnisownserdeurdientgeremaicnhewdeferkoomftnheew t(erste.neDwaalys 0,
11, and 18 are "new" and days 2, 24, and 21 are "old".
Biological Observations
Sinurtvhiev2a4l:anAdll48sumrvgi/vLintgrefairtsmtegnetnserwaatsiosntadtiaspthincaildlsy asipgpneiafriceadntnloyrdmiaflfeartentetstfrtoermmitnhaetinoeng.atiSvuervival
control group.
nReeopnraotdeuscotnioDna:yD9a. phTnhiedBsoninfetrhreocnointtr-otelstansdhotwreeadtmtehantt rgerporuopdsucCt1io2n mwga/sLnosttarstiegdnipfricoadnutcliynrgeduced
iinncalnuydetdreianttmheentstgatriosutipcaCl1a2namlygs/iLs o(fp t>h0e.0r5e)p.roTduhceti2o4nadnadta48dumegt/oLatsrteaatitsmteinctalglyrosuipgnsifwiecraentneoftfect
on survival.
0Gr1o2wmthg:/LTwheereBonnoftersrigonniifitc-taensttlyshroewduecdedthiant cmoemapnarliesnogtnhtaontdhedrnyegwaetiigvhetcionnttrhoelt(rpea>tm0e.0n5t)groups
ScoenctoronldwGaesne9r5a%t.ioSnurAvciuvtale Einxpthoesu1r.5e,:2.A9,ft5e.r6,481-2h,oaunrdso2f4emxgp/osLutrree,astumrevnitvgalroiunptshewansega10t0i,ve100,
100, 90, different
and 0% respectively. Survival from the negative control (p C)
in the 0.05).
24
mg/L
treatment
group
was
significantly
Or niasssmReeponPROtS. Auschme1s
nas
000123
`Summary of PercentMortality
Mean Measured
eta mg/L Jf e hf f] ]
J owJw]|
`Second GenerationMortality
Ei R R e Toneah m--s mg/L
[Exposed 48-hours
f P f f w r p ] ]
So
000129
ISnudmimviadruyalolfy-LEexnpgotshedanFdirDstr-yGeWneeirgahttioonfDSauprhvinviidnsg
Mean Measured Concentration,
[Number of [1cTM (Surviving |JH Eeqgih
[orc | By Weight
mg/L
Daphnids | 1" =SD. m
5b, mg
[NegativeCone [10 [36520111 [sb acerotis
Jows ro100 fous room
pop leew Jomo
[ob lasso: fom: omes
[2
[ewiou [ors roeet
pro
Reproduction
MMeeaasnured mCogn/cLentration, Negative Control
fNouf mber
[Mean Live
Total
Young Surviving[1t Day of (Number of
Total |g,
D[Sauprhvniviidnsg |[ASdDu)lt Daphnid (+|n RP
NIiemomnoabtielse | Abogrsted
1224192 9
fb s eam
pop mews
bo|
hp]
Po Bb ep
mums was
bo] po
pole
bo lo
ee
CONCLUSIONS
tThheerteestwesurbestnaonacdevaetrsceonecfefnetcrtastoinonsu<r1v2ivmalg,/rLefporrod2u1ctdiaoyns.orDgarpohwntihoa fmaDganphaneixapomsaegdntao e2x4poasnedd48to mg/L had significantly reduced survival.
rt tilAsset Spor FOS uschmen 1
wn
000125
Author and/or submitter: 3M Company, Environmental Laboratory P.0. Box 33331 St. Paul, MN 55133
DATA QUALITY
Reliability: Klimisch ranking 1.
REFERENCES
This study Company.
was
conducted
at
Wildlife
Intemational,
Ltd.
Easton,
MD
at
the
requestofthe
3M
OTHER
Last changed: 5/3/00
rh iilAsse Bor PFO -Auchan 1
wn
000126
(CRHefReOreNnIceCNToO.X80I)CITY TO THE SALTWATER MYSID
TEST SUBSTANCE
OIcdtenatnietsyu:lfPoenrifcluacoirdo,oc1t,a1n,e2s,u2l,f3o,n3.a4t.e4;,5m,a5,y6,a6l,s7o,b7,e8,r8e.f8e-rhreepdttaodeacsafPlFuoOrSo-,orpoFtC-a9s5s.ium(1s-alt, CAS # 2795-393) SRaemmpalreksw:asTshteorteedstusnudbesrtaanmcbeieinsta cwohnidtietipoonwsdeprri.or Staomtpeslteinwga. sPutraikteyndfertoemrm3inMedlottonbuem9b0e.r42917%. by LC/MS, 'H-HMR, "F-NMR and elemental analyses techniques. METHOD
Method: OPPTS 850.1350
Type: Flow-through chronic
GLP: Yes
Year completed: Study completed 1999. Species: Mysidopsis bahia
Report completed 2000
ASnuaplpyltiiecra:l Imno-nhiotuosreicnugl:turPeFs,OWSilmdelaisfuerIendteomnatdiaoynsal0,,Lt7d,.,14E,a2s1t,on2,8,MaDnd 35
Exposure period: 35 days
cStoanttiisntgiceanlcymettahboledss:to iSduernvtiivfayltrdaetaatmweanst gervoaluupasttehdat(psrhioorwteodpaaisrtiantigsatincdalalfytseirgpnaiifriicnagn)t duisfifnegr2enXce2
g(rpo=0w.t0h5))wferroemetvhaelunaetgeadtifvoer cnoonrtmraollitgryouuspi.ngAlSlhacpoinrtoi-nWuioluks'-vsatreisatbalneddaftora h(roemporgoednuectiitoynoafnvdariance
buseitnwgeeBnarttlreetatt'msetnetst.andAncaolnytsriosl omfevaanrsi.anAclelasntadtiDsutnicnaelttte'sststewsetrweepreerufsoerdmetdo euvsailnugaatepedrisffoenraelnces
`cToemsptumtyesridwistahgSe:PS<S2/4P-ChoVuerrssioolnd
2.0 or at test
"TOXSTAT initiation
Release
3.5"
statistical
software.
Pretreatment: None
`DTielsuttCioonndwiattioenrsc:hemNaitsutrrayl (sdeuarwiantgerthdiel4ut-ewdeteok2p0e%r,iowditihmmweeldliawtaetelry,p0r.e4ce5dmimngfilttheeredt.est):
Salinity: 20 (20-20) %,
TOC: <10mglL
aSptporcokxiamnadtetlesyt 2s4olhuotuirosn pprrieopratroautsieo. n:AfPtrerimmairxyinsgt,octkheprperpiamraerdyastt0o.c0k8s9o5lumtgio/nLwaansd pmrioxpoerdtifoonrally
0di.l0u2t2e4d,w0i.t0h11d2i,lu0t.i0on05w5a9t,erantdo p0r.e0p0a2r8e0fmigv/eLa.ddiTthioenaslixssttoocckkssowluetrieonisnjaetcctoednciennttorathteiodnisluotefr m0i.0x4i47n,g
chambers (at a rate 150 mL/minute) to
of 4.60 achieve
mL/minute) the desired
where they were mixed test concentrations.
with
dilution
water
(at
a
rate
of
SFtlaobwiltithyrooufgthherattees:t cAhpepmriocxailmsaotleultyioenlse:veEnxvtorelmuemleyasdtdaibtlieonsoftest water every 24- hours
aEtxtpaochseudrteovteswsoelhso:lePsroionrotpoppoasiirtiengs,idmeys.siAdfsteprlarceeadchiinngglassesxubaelakmeartsurwiittyh, npayilrosnpmlaecsehdsicnrgeleanss
DpertrindiishAsesseswmietnthRseipdoessPEoOfSnAylconhmeess1h
screen
attached
with
silicone
adhesive.
Both
pre-pairing 3
000127
oafntdesptossto-lpuatiiorni.ng Tehxpeodseuprtehvwesasselasppwreorxeimpalatceeldy i6n.29cLmglparsisoraqtuoapraiiarifinlgleadnwdi5t.h5acpmproafxtiemraptaeilryin5g.L
`Twhheictheswtacshadmibppeerds ofuotr tohafe steecsotncdhagemnbeerratfiroonmetxhpeosaupprreowpreiraete2Ltrbeeaatkmeernst wgriotuhp.1Loftest solution
Numberofreplicates: four
Number Number
of of
concentrations: six plus a fish per replicate: Fifteen
negative juveniles
control before
pairing,
pairs
(10
adults)
when
possible after pairing.
WFeaetdeirngc:heFmeidstlrivyedburriinengshtrhiemsptunaduyp:lii 3 or four times per day. Not fed the last dayof the test.
Dissolved oxygen range (0- 35 days):
6.06.4 mg/L (control exposure)
59-63 mg/L (1.3 mg/L exposure)
PH range (0-35 days)
8.28.4 (control exposure)
Test tem8p.er3a-t8u.r4e(r1a.n3gmeg(/0L-ex3p5odsauyrse))
2244..45--2255..12001CC ((1c.o3ntmrgo/lLexepxopsousruer)e)
Methodofcalculating mean measured concentrations: arithmetic mean
RESULTS
MNoemaisnuarledcocnocnecnetnrtartaitioonnss:: B<kLcOonQt,rol0,.005.70,860,.102.,170,.205.,340,.505.,691,.3,1.24,.62.m7g/mLg/L
Element val3u5e:-d2a0y-d(apyossiu-rpvaiivrailng()prseu-rpvaiivrailnNg)ONEOCE=C0=.505.5m5g/mLg/L
3355--ddaayy rgerporwotdhucNtOioEnCNO=E0.C25=m0g./25Lmg/L
2" generatio3n5a-cduatyerseuprrviovda&l NgOroEwCth=L0O.5E5Cm=g/0L.5(5himggh/esLt concentration tested)
AAlnlaleylteimceanltmveatlhuoedsoblaosgeyd:onAnmaelaynsemseoafsutersetdsoclountcieonntsrawteiroensperformed at Wildlife Intemational
(LtHdP. LuCs/iMnSg)h.igWhhpeenrfdoertmearnmcienilniqguitdhecchornocmeanttoragtriaopnhoyfwtihteh
mass spectrometric test substance in the
detection test solutions,
the.
smaamdee atondqumaonsttifpyroonmitnheenbtaspiesakofriensdpiovnisdeuaflorispeormfelruiocrcoooemtpaonneesnutlsf.onaTtheewLasOQuse(dl.imiNtoofattempt was
quantitation) fortifications
was 0.0.0458 mg/L in analyzed concurrently
tdhuirsisntgudsya.mpTlheeamnaelaynsipsewracesnt92r.e8.coSvaemrpyolfesmactorlliexcted
at
pre-
test ranged from 67.1110 103% of
57.4 10 99.3% of nominal. nominal. Measured values
Samples at for samples
test initiation had measured values from taken at test termination ranged from
59.810 90.0%of nominal
Dr Iti Assent por PFOS -uschmen 1 ee
we
000128
Summary of analytical chemistry data:
Nominal Test|
Concentratio |
Measured Dupl
14, 21, 28,35,
icate
Days,
Values at 0,
Respectivel
7,
y,
nmgl |mgL
Negative
Control
|All<LOQ
0.086 17
0.0694, 0.0578, 0.0478, 0.0619, 0.0606, 0.0614, 0.0554, 0.0509, 0.0515, 0.0569, 0.0580, 0.0514
0.125, 0.114, 0.0778,0.125, 0.124, 0.127, 0.0970, 0.112, 0.122, 0.128, 0.124, 0.119
0.34
0.289, 0.286, 0.231, 0.197, 0.276,
0.253, 0.227, 0.212, 0.262, 0.271,
0.278, 0.251
0.69
0.562, 0.659, 0.581, 0.450, 0.543, 0.542, 0.516, 0.528, 0.529, 0.544, 0.556, 0.583
1.23,1.32,1.13, 1.20, 1.35, 1.27, 1.23, 1.15, 1.39, 1.39, 1.26, 1.20
2.7
2.56,2.79, 2.58, 2.30, 2.54, 2.69, all
mysids dead after 14-days exposure
|| MCoenacnenMtreaatsiuorn,ed mg/L
0.057 0.12 0.25 0.55 13 [2.6
|Percen"t""of om
7 74 93
Biological observations
wSuerrveivstaalt:istAilclalsluyrsviigvniinfigcmayntsliyddsifafpepreeantrefdronmortmhael.negSautrivvievaclonitnrtolhegr1.o3upa.nd 2. 6 mg/L treatments
Reproduction: The dayoffirst brood release in this study was Day 22. Dunnett's test showed
that
the
nreegpartoidvuecctoinotnrowla(sps<ig0n.i0f5i)c.antTlhyere1d.u3caenddi2n.t6hme g0/.5L5
mg/L tre
treatment
atment group
groups were
when compa
not included
red to
in the
statistical Growth:
analysisof the reproduction Mysids exposed to PFOS at
data due to a statistically significant concentrations < 0.25 mg/L showed
difference in survival. no statistically
significant reductions in length or dry weight (p < 0.05).
Second
was not
Generation
statistically
Acute Exposure:
different from the
Survival
controls.
in all PFOS treatment groups was
All surviving mysids in the second
> 95% and
generation
`exposure appeared normal with no overt signsoftoxicity.
Dre tilAssRoer FsOS-achment 1
as
000129
Percent Survival
Mean Measured [Juvenile
|Adult
Concentration, |Pre-Pairing
mg/L
Survival, Day 20
Post-Pairing
[Survival, Day
35
Negative
78
Control
pm r o
Be
Second Generation Survival
[Mean Measured|Total
Number
|Concentrations, (Number |Aliveafter
mg/L
[Exposed [96-hours
Percent Survival
Negative
71
p|s Cosntrol o fn s r f] ] bs pfs fw]
ere)
a
000130
Adult Mysid Growth
Number of
canMeasured | MSuyrsviidvisn/gNumber
me/L
Exposed
[[TMoetaalnL+enSgDt,h,mm [[DMreyanWe+igShDt,, mg
-
-
0.00624
Reproduction
Concentration Replicate Reprod Number
mg/L
Days fYoung.
Negative Control
A 70
is
B 53
14
c 70
E)
D2
1
0.057
A
Ig
B
14
c [2
13
D 56 21
012
A 70
2
B3
2
c sa
2
D 70
18
02s
A 70
1
B s6
12
c 61
2
D 56
10
OrttrAsean Nut FOS aachmert
YoonSOTO
peproductive Day 0257 0264 0286 0.452 0283 0200 0.186 0375 0300 0478 0.407 0257 027 0214 0344 0179
vera ea
50 00.3019525+ 02617 0.0873 0361 20.101 0003752237
wr
0001.31
[Mean Measured
Numberof
(Concentration, ~ Replicate Reproductive
mg/L
Days
0.55
x 54
B 56
c 70
D 56
13
A2
B 14
c0
D1
"Mean Numberof
(UO Young/ Reproductive Day
3 0.0556
6
0.107
3
0.0429
1
0.0179
0
-
0
-
0
-
0
.
oo
Stal Ven =
0.0559 + 0.0376 B
CONCLUSIONS There were no statistically significant effects on survival, reproduction or growthofmysid shrimp exposed to potassium perfluorooctanesulfonate at concentrations < 0.25 mg/L for 35 days. Reproduction, length and dry weight were the most sensitive biological endpoints in this study. Second generation mysids exposed to PFOS during astatic 96-hour exposure showed no adverse effects. Submitter: 3M Company, Environmental Laboratory
P.0. Box 33331 St. Paul, MN 55133 DATA QUALITY Reliability: Klimisch ranking = 1 REFERENCES This study was conducted at Wildlife Intemational Ltd., Easton, MD at the request of the 3M Company. OTHER Last changed: 5/3/00
raf niasss Repos PROS. Aachmes 1
us
000132
CHRONIC TOXICITY TO EARLY LIFE STAGE OF FISH (Reference No. 84)
TEST SUBSTANCE
Identity: Perfluorooctanesulfonate; may also be referred to as 14C-78.02, POS or FC-95. (1Octanesulfonic acid, 1,1,2.23,3.4,4,5,5,6,6,7,7,8,8,8-heptadecafluoro-, potassium salt, CAS # 2795-39-3) Remarks: The test substance is a white powder. Sample was radiolabeled. Sample purity was not characterized
The following summary is abbreviated due to the fact that this study has been superceded by a more recent test.
METHOD
tMheet"hPordo:poMseetdhroedcowmamsednedveedlobpieodasbsyayEpGro&cedGu,reBifoonroemgigcaannddfcrlyosstealgyesfooflflroewsedhwtahtoesre fpirsehs"e,nUt.eSd.in EPA, 1972. Type: Flow-through chronic GLP: No Year completed: 1978 Species: Pimephalespromelas
RESULTS
30-Day NOEC: 1 mg/L 30-Day LOEC: 1.9 mg/L 30-Day MATC: >1 mg/L and <1.9 mg/L
DATA QUALITY
Reliability: Klimisch rankin=g 2. This study performed, but the analytical methodology was
satisfied criteria questionable.
for
quality
testing
at
the
time
REFERENCES
This study was Massachusetts
conducted at E at the requestof
G & G, the 3M
Bionomics, Company.
Aquatic
Toxicology
Laboratory
in
Wareham,
OTHER
Submitter: 3M Company, Environmental Laboratory P.0. Box 33331 St. Paul, MN 55133
rr --
uw
000133
Last changed: 5/3/00
ACUTE TOXICITY TO FISH (Reference No. 86)
TEST SUBSTANCE
9I4de,notirtyF:C-9P4e-rXfl.uo(r1o-oOccttaanneesusluflofnoantiec,aLciidt,hi1u,1m,2sa,l2t,;3,m3a,4y,4a,l5s.o5,b6e,6r,e7f,e7r,r8e.d8,t8oheapstPadFeOcaSflLuiosraol-t,, FC-
lithium salt, CAS # 29457-72.5)
Rtheemtaerstkssu:bsTteasntcesaimnpwlaetewra(satpapkreonxifmraotmel3yM24p.r5od%utcetsitosnulbostt#a1n.ceTahnedt7es5t.s5a%mwpalteeri)s.a Nmioxture of
calculations sample.
were
made
to
adjust
for
the
actual
concentrationof
the
est
substance
in
the
test
METHOD
Method: Not noted.
Type: Static acute
GLP: No
Year completed: 1994
Species: Pimephalespromelas
ASnuaplpyltiiecra:lAmqounaittiocriBnigo:sysptHemasndInDc.O, FcoornttCeonltlins, CO
Exposure period: 96-hours
Statistical methods: LC,, values calculated by Trimmed Spearman - Karber.
Test fish age: 79 days.
Length and weight: Average length = 2.1 + 0.3em
Average weight = 0.069 + 0.03 g
Loading: 0.69g fish /L
Pretreatment: None
Test Conditions
Dilution water: Carbon filtered well water
Dilution water chemistry:
pH: 84
DO: 81mg
S0toyicekldanadtetsetsstasmoplluteicoonncpernetpraartaitoinono:f 4A00pmrigm/aLr.y Asltloctkesstosloultuitoinownsasweprreepmaareddeibnydidliultuitoinngwathteer
appropriate amount concentration.
of
stock
solution
with
dilution
water
to
make
1
Lof
solution
per
Stability of the test chemical solutions: Exposure vessels: 2 L glass beakers
Not noted.
Number of replicates: two.
Number of fish per replicate: ten
Number of concentrations: six plus a negative control
Water chemistry during the study:
[LT ---- a--
40
0001.34
Dissolved oxygen range (-0 96 hours): 6.0-7.2 mg/L (control exposure) 4.87.9 mg/L. (56.0 mg/L exposure)
PH range (0-96 hours) 8.0-8.4 (control exposure) 8.08.4 (56.0 mg/L exposure)
`Test temperature range (0 96 hours) 19219.50C
RESULTS
Nominal Element
concentrations: Bk control, 3.2, 5.6, value: 96-hour LC,= 19 mg/L (95%
10.0, C.L:
18.0, 32.0, 56.0 16-24 mg/L)
mg/L
Mortality of controls: None
Remarks: Values reported are for concentrationof the test substance
the test sample. No in the test sample.
calculations
were
made
to
adjust
for
the
CONCLUSIONS
The test LC for
sample fathead
containing 24.5% Perfluorooctanesulfonate, minnow of 19 mg/L.
Lithium
salt
exhibited
a
96-hour
Submitter: 3M Company, Environmental Laboratory P.0. Box 33331 St. Paul, MN 55133
DATA QUALITY
Rdeeltiearbmiilniattyi:onKolfitmhisecthesrtansukbisntga2n.ceTchoinscesntturdayt,iwohniilnetwheelltecsotnsdoulcuttieodn,s;laacnkds daneatleyrtmiicnaaltdiaotnaoffor:the sample purity.
REFERENCES
This study was conducted M018, 3/25/94,
by
the
3M
Company,
Environmental
Laboratory,
Lab
Request
number
OTHER
Last changed: 5/2/00
Def nia ssssmens Repos PFO Atachmens 1
wa
000135
ACUTE TOXICITY (Reference No. 87)
TO
AQUATIC
INVERTEBRATES
(E.G.,
DAPHNIA)
TEST SUBSTANCE
I94d,enotritFyC:-9P4e-rXfl.uo(r1o-oOccttaanneessuullffonoantiec,acLiidt,hi1u,1m,s2a,l2t,;3m,3a,y4,a4l,s5o,5b,e6,r6e,f7e,r7r,e8d.8t,o8-ahsepPtFadOeScafLliusoarlot-,,FClithium salt, CAS # 20457-72-5) sRuebmsatraknsc:e anTdhe75te.s5t%sawamtpelr)e.isNaomicxatlcuurleatoifotnhsewteerstesmuabsdteantcoeadijnuwsattfeorr(tahpeparcotxuiamlactoenlcyen2t4r.a5ti%ontesotf the test substance in the test sample.
METHOD
Method: Not noted.
Test type: Static acute
GLP: No
Year completed: 1994
Species: Daphnia magna
Analytical monitoring: pH and DO content
Statistical methods: Test daphnid source:
OEbCt,a,ivnaelduefsrocamlUc.uSl.atEedPAus-iNngETTArCim,mDeudluStphe,aMrimnanne-sKoatraber method
`Test daphnid age at study initiation: <24-hours
Test Conditions
Dilution water: Carbon-filtered well water
Dilution water chemistry:
pH: 8.4
DO: 86 mg/L
0Stoyicekldanadtetsetsstasmoplluteicoonnscpenrterpaatriaotnioonf:10A00prmigm/aLr.y sAtlolctkesstolsuotliuotniownassweprreepmaareddeibnydidliultuitoinngwattheer
appropriate amountof concentration.
stock
solution
with
dilution
water
to
make
50
mLof
solution
per
Exposure vessels: 100 Number of replicates:
mL 4
glass
beakers
containing
50
mL
of
est
solution.
Numberof daphnids per replicate: 5
NWautmebrerchoefmicsotncreyndturartiinognst:hefsitvuedpyl:us a negative control
Dissolved oxygen at test termination:
7.0 mg/L (control exposure)
pH 7a.t8tmesgt/tLer(mi1n0a0t0imong:/L exposure)
8.6 (control exposure)
8.6 (1000 mg/L exposure)
Test temperature range (0 48 hours)
20.1-21.00C
E-- lement basi-- s: mortality a-- nd immobilization
a
000136
RESULTS
Nominal Element
vcaolnuce:entrat2i4o-nhso:urBEk Ccon,=tro3l3,01(0209,0-13807,0)32m0g,/5L60,
1000
mg/L
48-hour EC,= 210 (190-230) mg/L
48-hour NOEC = 100 mg/L
StthaetTisrtiicmamleEdvaSlpueaatrimona:n-KTahrebeErCmSe0thvaolduewsitahndtr9im5%setcotonf0i%d.ence intervals were calculated using
Mortality of controls: None
Remarks: Values reported are for concentrationof the test substance
the test sample. No in the test sample.
calculations
were
made
to
adjust
for
the
CONCLUSIONS
The test EC for
sample containing 24.5% Perfluorooctanesulfonate, Daphnia magna of210 mg/L.
Lithium
salt
exhibited
a
48-hour
Submitter: 3M Company, Environmental Laboratory P.0. Box 33331 St. Paul, MN 55133
DATA QUALITY
Rdeeltiearbmiilniattyi:onKloifmtihsecthesrtasnukbisntga2n.ceTchoinscesntturdayt,iwohniilnetwheelltecsotnsdoulcuttieodn,s;laacnkds daneatleyrtmiicnaaltdiaotnoa ffort:he sample purity.
REFERENCES
This study was conducted MI018, 2/10/94.
by
the
3M
Company,
Environmental
Laboratory,
Lab
Request
number
OTHER
Last changed: 5/2/00
Dra ninsessReportPFOS-tachment 1
wo
000137
ACUTE TOXICITY TO FISH (Reference No. 90)
TEST SUBSTANCE
Identity: 99, or 3M
SPaemrfpllueorNooo.ct2a.nc(s1u-lOfcotnaantee,suDlfEonAicsaaltc;idm,a1y,1a,l2s,o2,b3e,3r,e4f,e4r,5r,e5d,t6o,6a,s7,P7,R8O.8S.8D- EA
salt,
FC-
hReepmtaardkesca:fluToersot-,sacmopmlped.iswaimtihx2t,u2r-eiomifntohbeistfe{settshuanboslt]an(c1e:1i)n, wCaAtSer#(a7p0p2r2o5x-i1m4a-t8e)ly 25% test
s10ubasdtjaunstcefoarndth7e 5ac%tuwaaltecro)n.cenAltlravtailounoesfrtehpeortteesdt sreulbastteatnocethiins tmhiexttuerset.samNpolec.alculations were made
METHOD
Method: Environmental Protection April, 1975. Standard Methods.
Agency,
Ecological
Research
Series
EPA-660/3-75-009,
Type: Static acute
GLP: Yes
Year completed: 1979
Species: Lepomis macrochirus
SAunpapllyiteirc:alOmsoangietoCraitnfgis:hepriHesa,nIdncD. iOn/OasmamgoenBieaaccho,ntMeinstsouri.
Exposure period: 96-hours
Statistical methods: Probit analysis.
Test fish age: Not noted.
Length and weight: Average length = 28.6 + 2.17 mm.
Average weight = 0.60 + 0.15
Loading: 0.2 g fish /L
Pretreatment: None
`Test Conditions
Dilution water: Laboratory well water
Dilution water chemistry:
Dissolved oxygen: 9.3 mg/L
Hardness: 255 mg/L as CaCO,
Alkalinity: 368 mg/L as CaCO3
pH: 78
Conductivity: 50 Omhos/em
Scotnoccekntarnadtitoenstofso1l5u0timogn/pmrLe.parTahteiotens:t cPornicmeanrtyrasttioocnks pwreerpearperdepianrdeedibonyitzreadnswfaetrerrinagtaappropriate
afloiaqmuowtshoefnthsteirsrtioncgkinsttaonxdiacradntdailrieqcutoltys.to Ttehsettecsotncchenatmrbaetriso.nsTwheeretesptrespoalurteidonbsasweedroennototteadl to
sample, not on percent concentrationof Concentrations dosing rate: Once
the
test
substance
in
the
test
sample.
SEtxapboilsiutryeofvetshseeltse:st4c0heltmcircagllasssolauqtuiaornisa:coNnottainnoitnegd30Lof test solution.
raf nia sscssmen Repos PROS. tachment 1
ae
000138
Number of replicates: one
Number of fish per replicate: ten Number of concentrations: six plus a negative control `Water chemistry during the study:
Dissolved oxygen range (0 --96 hours):
6.0- 8.4 mg/L (control exposure)
5.8-83 mg/L (18 mg/L exposure)
82-83 (control exposure)
8.3-8.3 (18 mg/L exposure) "Test temperature: Temperature held constant at 220C through use ofa water bath for test vessels.
RESULTS
Nominal concentrations: Bk control, 18, 37, 75, 160, 320, 650 mg/L Element value: 24-hour LCy, = 460 (370-580) mg/L.
48-hour LC, = 370 (290-470) mg/L. 96-hour LC,= 31 (22-43) mg/L.
96-hour NOEC = 18 mg/L (C.L. not calculated) All element values based on nominal concentrations
Statistical evaluation of mortality: Probit analysis was used to calculate LC, values and the corresponding confidence limits.
Quality Check for Test Organism Health:
9T6h-ehboluuregLilCl,saunnfdis9h5w%erceoncfhiadlelnecnegeldimwitisth(Car1e)fewreernecewictohminpotuhned9,5A%ntcionmfyicdienncAe.
The observed
limits reported
in
the literature, indicating that the fish were in good condition.
Cumulative percent mortality:
Nominal
TmesetlConcentration
48-hours 72-hours
wo fo fw]|
fo o fo o Jf w Jw
fm
Jorfw Joo]
000139
CONCLUSIONS
c`Tohnefitedsetnscaemipnlteerv9a6l-ohfou2r2-L4C3,mog/rL.blueTghiell9s6u-nhfoiusrh nwoasobdseetrevremdineeffdectto cboen3c1entmrga/tLiowniwtahs2 1985m%g/L. Submitter: 3M Company, Environmental Laboratory
P.O. Box 33331 St. Paul, MN 55133
DATA QUALITY
dReeltiearbmiilnitayt:ionKloifmtihsecthesrtasnukbisntga2n.ce Tchoinscesntturdayt,iwohniilnetwheelltecsotnsdoulcutteidon,slaacnkdsdaentaelrymtiicnaaltidoantoaf tfohr e
sample purity. There were the concentrations at given
also gaps in the time intervals.
measurementofwater
quality
criteria
fora
number
of
REFERENCES
This study was conducted by Analytical on behoaflthfe 3M Company.
BioCheistry
Laboratories,
Inc.
of
Columbia,
Missouri
OTHER
Last changed: 5/2/00
Dr IkiAssessment per PFOS sche 1
I
000140
ACUTE TOXICITY (Reference No. 93)
TO
AQUATIC
INVERTEBRATES
(E.G.,
DAPHNIA)
TEST SUBSTANCE
Imdiexnetditpyr:odPuecrtflFuoMr-o3o8ct2a0ne(ssuelefoRneamtaer;ksm)a. y (a1l-sOocbteanreesfuelrfroenditco aacsidP,F1O,S1,2o.r23F.C3-,94,54,o5r,5a,s6p,a6r,t7,o7f,8t,h8e.8-
heptadecafluoro-, potassium salt, CAS # 2795-39-3)
Retehemraarnkds:waTtheer (taesptprsoaxmipmlaeteislyFM2-43-82280%,taesmtisxutbusrteanocfetihne dteisetthsyulbesnteangcleycionldbiuettyhlyeltehneer galnycdol butyl
wteastters)u.bsCtaalnccuela(t2i8on%s)wienrtehematedstestaomapdljeusatntdesntovaaldujeusstumseinntgwtahesumpapdeer lfiomritthceonpcreensternacteioonfotfhethe
diethylene glycol butyl toxicity was due to the
ether or water when noted below. These presenceofthe Perfluorooctanesulfonate
calculations substance.
assumed
that
all
METHOD
Method: OECD 202
Test type: Static acute
GLP: Yes
Year completed: 1991
Species: Daphnia magna
AStnaatliysttiiccaallmmeotnhiotdosr:ingE:C,,DOv,alpuHes, cCaolncduulcattievd,itwyh,eanndpotsesmipbelreabtuyrsetwanedraerdmosntaittiostriecdaldatielcyh.niques
(Stephan, 1983)
`Test daphnid Analysts, Inc.,
source: Obtained Hampton, NH.
from
cultures
maintained
by
EnviroSystems
Division,
Resource
Test daphnid age at study initiation: Test Conditions
< 24-hours
Dilution Dilution
water: Well water water chemistry:
from
wells
at
EnviroSystems
in
Hampton,
New
Hampshire.
pH: 78%
Conductivity: 1200 umhos/cm*
TOC: <20mg/L
* Values measured at time of test.
Lighting: Cool white fluorescent lights, hours dark. No transition period noted.
intensity 23
uE/s/m'.
Photoperiod of 16-hours light,
8-
Satto1c0k00anmgd/tLe.st Tsohleutpiroinmsarpyresptaorcaktiwoans:prAopoprrtiimoanrayllsytodciklustoeldutwiiotnhwdailsutpiroenpwaarteedrintodiplruetpiaornewtahteer
five test concentrations.
Edexpptohosufrteesvtesssoellust:io2n5w0amsL6 cpml.astic beakers containing 200 mLof test solution. The approximate
Numberofreplicates: Four
Number of daphnids per replicate: Five
`NWuamtebrecrhoefmicsotnrceyndturartiinognst:heFsitvuedyp:lus a negative control
raf nial scones Report PROS. tachment 1
wa
000141
Dissolved oxygen range(0 -- 48 hours):
8.2 -8.5 mg/L (control exposure)
8.18.5 mg/L (150 mg/L exposure)
PH range (0 - 48 hours)
7.88.6 (control exposure)
7.88.6 (150 mg/L exposure) Test temperature range (0 - 48 hours)
20.8-21.00C (control exposure) 20.7-20.9CC (150 mg/L exposure) Conductivity range (0 - 48 hours)
1200 - 1300 umhos/em (control exposure)
1200 -- 1300 umhos/cm (150 mg/L exposure) [Element basis: mortality
RESULTS
Nominal
Element
concentrations: Bk control,
values: 24-hour EC,=
25, 40, 60,
>150 mg/L
100,
(C.L
150
not
mg/L
calculable)
48-hour ECy, = 49 (43-56) mg/L
24rhour EC, 42 mal. Perfluorooctanesulfonate concentration adjusted element value: 48-hour EC,, = 14 mg/L.
Cumulative percent mrtaity: All element values based
Biological observations:
on nominal concentrations
Ninety five percent survival
occurred
in
the
control
exposure.
The
numberofsurviving organisms and the occurrenceofsublethal effects and immobilization or
other sublethal effects were determined visually and recorded initially and after 24 and 48 hours.
Nominal Test
Concentration |24-hours
mg/L
[48-hours
Neg Conwol Jo [5 | f BE oe
[fo fo
[o so w|
Control response: Satisfactory
p15 pt
as
000142
CONCLUSIONS
c`Tohnefitdesetnscuebisnttaenrcvael4of84-h3o-u5r6EmCg,/Lf.orIDfaypohunaisasmuamegnalal wtaoxsicdiettyoerfmtihneedmitxotbuere49ismdgu/eLtwoitthhe a 95% Perfluorooctanesulfonate, the adjusted 48-hour EC,, value is 14 mg/L (49 mg/L X 0.28). Submitter: 3M Company, Environmental Laboratory,
P.O. Box 33331 St. Paul, Minnesota 55133
DATA QUALITY
cRoenlicaebnitlriattyi:onKsliinmithsechtersatnskoilnugti=on2s. aTndhesasmtpuldye lpaucrkistyanisalnyotticsaulffmiecaiesnutrleymcehnartaocftetreiszteds.ubstance
PAedrdfiltiuoonraololcyt,andcaetsaulisfofnoartaemaisxtthuerediaentdhytloexniecigtlyyccaolnnbouttybleeptohseirticvoeullydaatltsroibcuotnetdrtiobute to the
toxicity. were not
The basic water quality parameters included in the final report.
(hardness,
alkalinity
and
calcium/magnesium
ratio)
REFERENCES
HThaimsptsotund,yNwHasatcotnhdeurcetqeudesattofEtnvhiero3SMysCtoemmpsaDniyv.ision, Resource Analysts, Incorporated,
OTHER
Last changed: 5/3/00
CL ------------
nao
000143
ACUTE TOXICITY TO FISH (Reference No. 184)
TEST SUBSTANCE
Identity: Perfluorooctanesulfonate, Ammonium salt; `may also be referred to as PFOS NH," salt
or FC-93. (1-Octanesulfonic acid, 1,1.2.2,3,3,4,4,5,5,6,6,7,7,8,8,8-heptadecafluoro-, ammonium
salt, CAS # 29081-56-9)
Remarks: Test sample was taken from 3M production lot #1. The test sample is a mixture of
the
No
test substance in isopropanol and
calculations were made to adjust
water (25% test substance, 20% isopropanol, 55%
for the actual concentrationof the test substance in
water).
the test
sample.
METHOD
Method: Not noted.
GTyLpPe:: NoStatic acute
Year completed: 1974
Species: Pimephales promelas
Supplier: Not noted. Analytical monitoring: pH and DO content
Exposure period: 96-hours
Statistical methods: Plotted LC,,
Test fish age: Not noted. Length and weight: Average length =2 inches, Average weight = 1.5 g Loading: Not noted.
Pretreatment: Not noted
"Test Conditions
Dilution water: carbon filtered city of St. Paul, MN water
Dilution water chemistry: Not noted. Stock and test solution preparation: Not noted.
Concentrations dosing rate: Once Stability of the test chemical solutions: Not noted. Exposure vessels: Not noted.
Number of replicates: One.
Number of concentrations: five plus a `negative control
Water chemistry during the study:
Dissolved oxygen range (0 - 96 hours):
5.0-5.9 mg/L (control exposure)
4.2-5.0 mg/L (100 mg/L exposure) PH range (0 - 96 hours)
7.0-7.1 (control exposure) 7.0-7.1 (100 mg/L exposure)
`Test temperature range (0 - 96 hours)
21-220C (70-720F)
ot
000144
RESULTS
Nominal concentrations: Bk control, 10, 25, 50, 75, 100 mg/L
Element value: 96-hour LCy,= Mortality of controls: None
85
mg/L
(CL
not
determined)
wRaesmacroknsd:uct9e5d%oncotnhfeimdiexntcuerleoimfitsthweetreestnsoutbcsatlacnucleatiend2f0or%thiissopmraoteprainaoll. aAndddi5t5io%nawlaltye,r.teTsthieng
dveatleuremrienpeorttheediampppalcitcosftoththeatprmeisxetnucreeofantdhenootrgtahneitcesstosluvbesnttaonrcew.haNtopoartttieomnpotfwathsemtoaxdiecittoy can be
contributed to the Perfluorooctanesulfonate, ammonium sal.
CONCLUSIONS
`LTChe,tfeosrt sfaatmhpelaed cmoinntnaionwionfg8255%mgPe/rLfluorooctanesulfonate, ammonium salt exhibited a 96-hour
Submitter: 3M Company, Environmental Laboratory P.O. Box 33331 St. Paul, MN 55133
DATA QUALITY
Reliability: Klimisch ranking 3.
REFERENCES
`This study was conducted by the 3M Company, Environmental Laboratory, 7/29/74 to 8/2/74. OTHER
Last changed: 5/3/00
raf nisAsssnens Repos PFOS -Atachmen 1
1000145
ACUTE TOXICITY TO FISH (Reference No. 185)
TEST SUBSTANCE
Identity: or FC-93.
P(e1r-fOlcutoarnoeoscutlafnoesnuilcfaocniadt,e,1,A1,m2m,2o,n3,i3u,4m,4s,a5l,t;5,m6,a6y,7a,l7s.o8,b8e,8r-ehfeeprtraeddectaoflausorPoF-,OSamNmHo,n'isualmt
salt, CAS # 29081-56-9)
tRheematersktss:ubsTteasntcesaimnpilseopwraospatnaokleannfdrowmat3erM(p2r5o%dutcetsitosnublsotta#n1c.e,T2h0e%tesitsosparmopplaenoils,a5m5i%xtwuarteero)f.
No calculations sample.
were
made
to
adjust
for
the
actual
concentration
of
the
test
substance
in
the
test
METHOD
Method: Not noted.
Type: Static acute
GLP: No
Year completed: 1974
Species: Pimephales promelas
Supplier: Not noted.
Analytical monitoring: pH and DO content
Exposure period: 96-hours
Statistical methods: Plotted LC,
Test fish age: Not noted.
Length and weight: Loading: Not noted.
Average
length
=2
inches,
Average weight =
1.5 g
Pretreatment: Not noted
Test Conditions
Dilution water: Carbon filtered city ofSt. Paul, MN water
Dilution water chemistry: Not noted.
Stock and test solution preparation: Not noted.
Concentrations dosing rate: Once
Stability of the test chemical Exposure vessels: Not noted.
solutions:
Not
noted.
Number of replicates: One.
Number of concentrations: five plus a negative control
`Water chemistry during the study:
Dissolved oxygen range (0-96 hours):
4.5-5.7 mg/L (control exposure)
3.8-5.0mg/L. (125 mg/L exposure)
PH
Not recorded at highest range (0-96 hours)
conc.
(150
mg/L)
due
to
100%
mortality.
7.0-7.0 (control exposure)
7.0-7.0 (125 mg/L exposure)
rf nia NssostsmreenscoRerpdoesdPaFtSh-igthaecshtmecnotn1c. (150 mg/L) due to 100% mortality.
sa
000126
`Test temperature range (0 -- 96 hours) 20-210C (69-700F)
RESULTS
NEloemmiennatlvcaolnucee:ntr9a6t-ihoonusr:LCB;k,=con1t0r0olm,g5/0L, (75C,L.10n0o,t 1d2e5t,er1m5i0nemdg)/L
Mortalityof controls: None
wRaesmacroknsd:uct9e5d%oncotnhfeimdiexntcuerleiomfittshweetreestnsoutbcsatlacnucleatiend2f0or%tihissopmratoeprainaol.l aAndddi5t5io%nawlaltye,r.teTsthieng
value reported determine the
iampppalcitesotfotthheatprmeisxetnucreeofatnhdenootrgtahneitcesstosluvbesnttaonrcew.haNtopoartttieomnpotfwtahes
made to toxicity
can
be
contributed to the Perfluorooctanesulfonate, ammonium salt.
CONCLUSIONS
TLhCe,tfeosrt sfaatmhpelaed cmoinntnaionwinogf2150%0 mPger/fLluorooctanesulfonate, ammonium salt exhibited a 96-hour
Submitter: 3M Company, Environmental Laboratory P.0. Box 33331 St. Paul, MN 55133
DATA QUALITY
Reliability: Klimisch ranking 3.
REFERENCES
`This study 1019/74.
was
conducted
by
the
3M
Company,
Environmental
Laboratory,
10/15/74
to
OTHER
Last changed: 5/3/00
Cr --
ws
000147
ACUTE TOXICITY TO FISH (Reference No. 503)
TEST SUBSTANCE
Identity: Perfluorooctylsulfonate, Fluoroalkyl ammonium derivative.
d[i1d-eDceycladmiimneituhmy,lNa-mdmeocnyilu-mN.sNal-td;immeatyhyall-so,
be referred salt with
to
as
1,1,2,2,3,3,4,4,5,5,6,6,7,7.8,8,8-heptadecafluoro--octanesulfonic acid (1:1), CAS # 251099-16-
8]
Remarks: The 3M production [ot the test laboratory as P3025. The
number was Lot 1. sample was labeled
The test sample F-11615, Lot 1.
is L-14394 referred to The test sample is a
by
m0i-x5t%uroeforfetshieduatlesptesrufblsutoarnoccheeimnicwaaltse)r.(Aalplprvoaxliumeastreelpyo3rt0e-d4r0e%latteesttosutbhisstamnicxet,ur6e.0-7T0h%e tweastters,amapnlde
a`gaiptpaetairosn.to Nbeoaca2l-cpuhlaasteiodnisswpeerrseiomna(dceletaoraldijquusitd fwoirththoepaacqtuuaelscoolindc)enwthriacthiornaopfitdhlyesteepsatrsautbesstaafntceer
in the test sample,
METHOD
Method: OECD 203
Type: Static acute
GLP: No
Year completed: 1996
Species: Pimephales promelas
Supplier: Not noted.
Analytical monitoring: DO, Exposure period: 96-hours
pH,
temperature,
and
conductivity
were
monitored
daily.
NStOatEisLtiwcaalsmceatlhcuoldast:ed LusLi,ngvaFliusheesrc'aslcEuxlaacttedtesutss.ing the Trimmed Spearman-Karber method. The
Test fish age: Not given.
Length and weight: Loading: 0.26 g/L
Average
length
=
11.3
mm,
Average
weight
=
7.8
mg.
Pretreatment: None
Test Conditions
pDriilourtitoonusweatienr:theDteecsth.lorinated City of Duluth, MN tap water. Water was aerated for 24-hours
Dilution water chemistry:
Hardness: 48 mg/L as CaCO,
pH:
8.08
Lighting: Cool-white fluorescent bulbs. transition period noted.
Photoperiodof 16-hours light, 8-hours dark used.
No
pSrteopcakreadndintdeisvtidsuoallultyiofnorperaecphartaesttiorenp:licWaatteecronaccecnotmramtoidoantbeydmfarsacstiaodndsi.tTieosnot fsvoilugtoiroonusswleyrsehaken
(tevsotrtseuxbs1t/a2ntcoe 1i/n34sLooluftdiiolnudteipothn).watTerh.e aTqhueeosoulsutpihoanssewwearse sviipgohroonuesdlyfrsotmirrtehde fvoerss2e1l-hatoumrisd-
depth.
rf ni sscssmen ReposPFO Aachen 1
nse
000148
ee
Concentrations dosing rate: Once
Stability of the test chemical solutions: Not noted.
`ETxepfloosnu-rlienevdeslsiedlss:fit4te-dLwgiltahssstjaorpspecrosnttaoiancincgom3m-oLdoaftteesotxsyolguetniofn.lusThhinegojafrshweeadrsepsaecael.ed with
Number of replicates: two
Number of fish per replicate: ten
N`Wuamtbererchoefmciosntcreyntdruartiinognst:hethsrteuedyp:lus a negative control
Dissolved oxygen range: (0-96 hours):
9.1 - 14.6 mg/L (control exposure)
PH 8ra7ng1e8: .2(0m-g9/6Lho(u7r0s0)mg/L exposure)
7.80 7.78
8.08 -7.99
(control exposure) (700 mg/L exposure)
Test temperature range (0 - 96 hours)
208-209C
Conductivity range (0-96 hours)
128 - 142 118-154
Omhos/em Ombos/em
(control exposure) (700 mg/L exposure)
oRbesmearrvaktsi:onOpexryigode.n wTahse addisdseodlvteodthoexyhgeaednscpoancceenitnrtahteiojanrsswbeerfeorseupsecra-lsiantguirnaitteidalilny athnedtaetsteach
vessels, particularly in the 700 mg/L exposure concentration.
RESULTS
Nominal Element
loading concentrations: Bk control, 400, 700, value: 24-hour LL, = 618 (568 - 673) mg/L
1,000
mg/L.
48-hour LL, = 607 (554 - 664) mg/L
72-hour LLy, = 595 (551 - 643) mg/L.
96-hour LLy,= 562 (523 -604) mg/L
96-hour NOEL = <490 mg/L
All element values based Biological observations
on nominal concentrations. after 96-hours: No mortality
or
abnormal
behavior
observed
in
the
ncoengcaetnitvreatcioonntsr.ol Sduurrfiancgitnhgewtaesst. obMsoerrtvaelditiyn whasaooflbtshefrevefidshinatthtehere7m0a0inmign/gLeexxppoossuurree
coobnsceernvterdatiinotnheat42040-hmogur/sL,eaxnpdos2ufrieshcownecreentqruaiteisonc.ent at 96-hours. No abnormal behavior was
Or iisssmReeportnPOtS Anschme1t
ss
000149
Cumulative percent mortality:
Nominal
LCoonacdeinntgraTteisotn,1,urs [48-hour|72-hours
mNge/sLGomt Jo TJo oJo]
fmooo s Ts on es nfs]]
Lowest concentration causing 100% mortality: 1,000 mg/L Mortality of controls: None Remarks: Values reported are for the test sample. No calculations were made to adjust for the concentration ofthe test substance in the test sample. CONCLUSIONS
mg/L. `The test sample 96-hour LL, for fathead minnow was determined to be 562 mg/L with a 95%
confidence interval of 523 ~604 mg/L.. The 96-hour no observed effects level (NOEL) was <490
Submitter: 3M Company, Environmental Laboratory, P.O. Box 3333. 1, St. Paul, Minnesota, 55133
DATA QUALITY
cRoenlicaebnitlriattyi:onKsliinmtihsechterstanskoilnutgi2o.nsTahnedsstaumdpylleapcukrsiatnyaliystnioctalsumfefaicsiuerntelmyecnhtaroafctteesrtiszeudb.stance
Additionally, data is for a mixture and toxicity cannot be positively attributed to didecyldimethylammonium Perfluorooctyflonsautel salt alone. Also, supersaturation ofthe test solutions with oxygen could also have contributed to thetoxicity. REFERENCES
`This study was conducted at AScl Corporation, Environmental Testing Division, Duluth, MN, at the request ofthe 3M Company.
OTHER
Last changed: 5/24/00
Dr ttacmaatPOS.cn ee
wy000150
ACUTE TOXICITY (Reference No. 504)
TO
AQUATIC
INVERTEBRATES
(E.G,
DAPHNIA)
TEST SUBSTANCE
FIlduenotriotayl:kylPearmflmuoonroiouctmyldseurilvfaotniavtee., d(i1d-eDceycladmiinmieutmh,ylNa-mdmeocnyli-uNm,sNa-ldt;immeatyhyall-s,osbaeltrweifterhred to as
1,1:2,2,3,3,4,4,5,5,6,6,7.7.8,8,8-heptadecafluoro-1-octanesulfonic acid (1:1), CAS # 251099-16-
8Remarks: The 3M production lot number was Lot 1. The test sample is L-14394 referred to by
the test laboratory mixtureofthe test
as P3025. substance
The sample was labeled in water (approximately
F-11615, Lot 1. The test sample is a 30-40% test substance, 60-70% water,
and
0ap-p5e%aorfsrteosbieduaal2-ppehrafsleuodrioscpheermsiicoanls()c.leaArlllivquailduewsitrhepooprateqdueresloaltied)towthhiicshmirxatpuirdel.y sTehpeartaetsetssaafmteprle
aingitthaetitoens.t sNaomplcael.culations were made to adjust for the actual concentration ofthe test substance.
METHOD
Method: OECD 202
Test type: Static acute:
GLP: No
Year Completed: 1996
Species: Daphnia magna
SAtnaatliysttiiccaallmmeotnhiotdosri:nEg:L,DOv,alpueHs, ctaelmcpuelraatteudruesainngd TcornidmumcteidviStpyewaerrmeanm-oKnairtboerredmedatihloy.d. NOEL
value calculated using Test daphnid source:
Steel's Many-One Ran Obtained from cultures
test. maintained
by
AScl
Corporation,
Duluth,
MN.
`Test daphnid age Test Conditions:
at
study
initiation:
<24-hours
pDriilourtitoonusweatienr:theDteecsth.lorinated City of Duluth, MN tap water. Water was aerated for 24-hours
Dilution water chemistry:
Hardness: 44 mg/L as CaCO,
pH:
8.04
Lighting: Cool-white fluorescent bulbs. transition period noted.
Photoperiod of 16-hours light, 8-hours dark.
No
pSrteopcakreadndintdeisvtidsuoallultyiofnosr cparcehpacroantcieontnr:atWiaotnebry-amcacsosmamdoddiatitoendoffravcitgioornos.usTleystshsaokleutnitoensstwere
substance in I 10 1/3 solution
Lofdilution depth). The
water. The solutions were vigorously aqueous phase was siphoned from the
stirred vessel
for 23-hours at mid-depth
(vortex after
1/2
seutling for 1-hour.
sEoxlpuotisounrseweverseseKlesp:t2c5o0vemrLedbdourorsiinlgictahteeegslt.ass beakers containing 200 mLoftest solution. The
Number of replicates: Four
rNauhmbtielrAosfsdeanpthRnoidrsPEpOer rAeupaclhimceantse1: Five
sr
000151
WNautmebrerchoefmciosntcreyntdruartiinognst:hefsivteudpyl:us 2 negative control Dissolved oxygen range (0 -- 48 hours): 8.69.1 mg/L. (control exposure) PH 8ra0n-ge8(80-mg4/8Lho(u5r0s)mg/L exposure) 8.04-8.11 (control exposure)
`Test tem7pe.r9a2t-u8r.e00ra(n5g0em(g0/L4e8xhpoousrusr)e) 209-21.0C
Conductivity range (0 - 48 hours). 142-155 Smhosem (control exposure)
Eleme1n2t0-ba1s2is4: Ommorhtoasli/teyman(d50immmgo/biLleizxaptoisounre)
RESULTS
Nominal Element
loading concentrations: Bk control, 3.13, 6.25, value: 24-hour EL,, = 27.0 (18.7-39.0) mg/L
12.5,
25,
50
mg/L
48-hour EL, = 11.3 (9.6-13.2) mg/L
48-hour NOEL= 6.25 mg/L
All element values based on nominal concentrations.
`StTartiimsmtiecdalSpEevaalrumaatni-oKna:rbTehremEeLth,odv.aluTehseaNndO9E5L%wcaosnfciadlceunlcaeteidntuesrivanlgsSwteeerle'scaMlacunlya-teOdnbeyRtahnek BteisotluogsiicnagltohebsTerOvXatSiTonAs:T sDtaatpihsntiicdalssionftthwearneegVaetrisvieocnon3t.r2o,lU,nainvdertshiety3.o1f3Waynodm6i.n2g5.mg/L otvreerattmcelnitniscaalppseiagrnseodfhteoaxlitchiytya.ndTnhoeremfaflectthsrnooutgehdouitn tthhiestsesttudwyitwherneo mmoorrttaalliittyy;, inmomiombmiolbiitlyizoartion vwiassuanloltyeadnadtraencyortdesetdcionnicteianltlryaatinodn.aftTehre24nuamnbde4r8ohfosurusr.viving organisms were determined
Dra itlAsses Ror FOS uschmens 1
ss
000152
Cumulative percent mortality:
Nominal Loading Test
|Concentration
mg/L
24-hours
|48-hours
ff h i o h s] ] [F 2 o Jw]
Control response: satisfactory Remarks: Values reported are for the test sample. No calculations were made to adjust for the concentrationofthe test substance in the test sample.
CONCLUSIONS
`The test substance 48-hour EL50 for `Daphnia magna was determined to be 11.3 mg/L with a
95% confidence interval of9.6-13.2 mg/L.
6.25 mg/L.
The 48-hour no observed effect level (NOEL) was
Submitter:
3M Company, Environmental Laboratory P.O. Box 33331 St. Paul, MN, 55133
DATA QUALITY
`Rceolnicaebnitlriattyi:onKsliinmtihsechterstanskoilnugti2o.nsTahned sstaumdpylleacpkusriatnyaliystnioctalsumfefaisciuernetlmyenchtaorfatcteesrtizseudb.stance Additionally, data is foar mixture and toxicity cannot be positively attributed to
didecyldimethylammonium Perfluorooctylsulfonate salt alone. REFERENCES
This study was conducted at AScl
the requestofthe 3M Company.
Corporation,
Environmental
Testing
Division,
Duluth,
MN,
at
OTHER
Last changed: 5/24/00
000153
APPENDIX II AQUATIC EXPOSURE DATA (MULTI-CITY STUDY)
CONTENTS Analytical reports for water column samples from the following cities:
Cleveland, TN Decatur, AL Mobile, AL Pensacola, FL Columbus, GA Port St. Lucie,FL.
-- Dra itl AsseRepsortPOS Append 1
oo
a
000154
Analytical Report
Fluorochemical Characterization of Surface Water Samples
Cleveland, Tennessee (W1973)
Centre Analytical Laboratory Report No. 023-014A
------------rr-- esm-- e------ --
Testing Laboratory Centre Analytical Laboratory, Inc.
3048 Research Drive State College, PA 16801
-------- ee-- e -- ~em-- esmee ---- e
3M Environmental Laboratory Contact
Kent R. Lindstrom
Bldg. 2-36-09
SL PaPu.lO,. MBNox5353133331-3331
Phone: (651) 778-5352
cr e ----------
Requester
Kris J. Hansen, Ph.D. 3M Environmental Technology & Safety Services
Bldg. 2-3E-09 P.O. Box 33331 St. Paul, MN 55133-3331
Introduction Results are reported for the analyosfias seriesof surface water samples received by Centre Analytical Laboratories, Inc. (Centre) from the 3M Environmental Laboratory. The samples
were collected from Cleveland, Tennessee. The Centre study number assigned to the project is
023-014.
Specific fluorochemical characterization by liquid chromatography /tandem mass spectrometry (LC/MS/MS) was requested for all samples. A total of8 samples were received for analysis.
The samples were prepared and analyzed by LC/MS/MS for the following list of fluorochemicals:
[TT -- ~
ns000155
Table I: Target Analysis
[CC
CompoundName
[7]
[ Perfluor Sulo fonao ste| ct_ an | e
C P [e Prefrlfulou ro cSuo rlfoc o nyt lo ama ic den | | tc_ aa_ n t| e e|
`The analytical method results are on file with
used here was validated Centre. Data presented
by Centre. here is the
The validation protocol and highest quality data available
at
this time.
Sample Receipt `iTnhdeivsiadmupallessamwpelree csounbtmaiitnteerds winerinedirveciediuvaeld.plaSstaimcpcloenstawienreersraencediwveedreonno0t5/p0r3e/s0e0r.vedT.heEisgahmtple collection dates were not supplied. Chain-of-custody information is presented in Attachment A.
Sample Hansen
MC-102H was on 5/16/00).
not
analyzed
as
per
client
request.
(E-mail
communication
from
Kris
Holding Times sTthabeilaintayloyfttichael maneatlhyotdesoufseidntwearessvtafloirdaltoendgeargapienrsitoadsmhaaxsinmoutmbeheonlddientgertmiimneedo.f 14 days. The
Methods-Analytical and Preparatory 41 LOMSMS 4.11 Sample Preparation for LC/MS/MS Analysis
rSeammpolveesrweseirdeuailnicthilaolrliynet.reaStoeldidwipthhas2e00exutLraocfti2o5n0(SmPgE/)Lwsaosduisuemdtthoiopsruelpfaatree stohleutsiaomnplteos cfaorrtrLiCdg/eM.ST/hMeScaanratlryisdigse. waAsffoirrtsyt-emliultleidltweirtphor5timoLn ooff4sa0m%plmeewthaasntorlanisnfwerarteedrtsoolautCi,o,n.SPE mTlhepoerltuiaotne owfasmedtihsacnaorldewdaasndcotlhleecStPedEfcoorlaunamlnyswiassbtyhLenC/elMuSt/edMSwi.thTh1i0s0t%remaettmheanntolre.suAlte5d in an eight-fold concentrationof the samples prior to analysis.
4.12 Sample Analysis by LC/MS/MS
cInhrHoPmLatCo,graanpahliicqucootloufmne.xtrBaacsteids ionnjetchteedafafninditpyaosfstehdetharnoaulgytheafloriqtuhied-spthaatsieonary phase in
`tahemocuonltoumfntirmeel.atiFveoltlootwhiengliqHuPidLmCobseiplaerapthiaosne,,EtShe/ManSalpyrtoeviisdersetaairnaepdidfoarnadcahcacruarctaetreistic
of nia Asscssmen Repos PFO - Append 1
wa
000156
mEleeacntsrofsoprraaynailsygzeinnegraalwlyidoeperraantgeedoaft orrelgaatniivcelcyommiploduntedmsp,eriantculruedsi;ngmoflleucourolcehsemairecailosn.ized,
fragmented, and detected. Tons quantitated against standards.
characteristicofknown
fluorochemicals
arc
observed
and
A Hewlett-Packard HP1100 HPLC system coupled to a Micromass Ultima MS/MS was umosneidttoorianngal(ySzReMt)h.e sSaammpplleesexwtrearcetse.xAtrnaacltyesdisonwa5s/1p6e/r0f0oarnmdedanuasliynzgesdelbeyctMeSd /reMaSctioonn 5H/P18L/C00a.nSdaMmpSl/eMMSC-me1t0h8oHdswuassedexftorracatneadlyosnis5/a2n2d/i0n0satnrudmaennatlpyazreadmoetne5r/s23c/a0n0.beThfoeund in attachment D.
Analysis 5.1 Calibration
A 7-point calibration curve was analyzed at the beginning and endofthe analytical sequence 5fo0r0,thaencdo1m0p0o0unngd/sLo(fppitn)teTrehset.rTehspeocnasleiobfratthieonqupaonitnittsawtieorneipornevpearrseuds atthe0,co2n5c,e5n0t,ra1t0i0o,n 2w5a0s,. pcloortrteeldatfioorncacocehffpoiicnite.ntUs(ri)nganldinecaorerfefgirceisesnitonofwidtehte1/rxmiwneaitgihotning(,)theweslroeped,eyt-eirnmteirnceedp.t anAd calibration curve is acceptable ifr >0.985 (7 > 0.970).
Calibration standards are prepared using the same SPE procedure used for samples.
Cinajleicbtriaotniso)nthcrhoeucgkhousttatnhdeaarndaslywseisreseqauneanlcyez.edCopmeprliioadinccaelliys o(betvaeirnyeditfhrtehee sttoanfdiavred sanaamlpytlee. concentrations are within +/-20%ofthe actual valu.
For the results reported here, calibration criteria were met.
52 Blanks
eExxttrraaccttiioonnbbllaannkkssswheorueldprneoptahreadveanadnyantaarlgyezteadnwaliyttheesvperreyseenxttraatctoiroanbboavtechthoefcsoanmcpelnetsr.atTihoen
of the low-level calibration standard. compliant.
For these samples, the extraction blanks were
Instrument blanks in the formofclean methanol solvent were also analyzed afier every highlheavveel caanlyibrtaatrigoent satnaanldyatreds, parnedseanftteratknorowanbohviegh-tlheevellows-almepvleels.calAigbariant,iotnhestbalnadnakrsd.shoFuolrd ntohte samples presented here the instrument blanks are compliant.
53 Surrogates Surrogate spikes are not a componentof the LC/MS/MS analytical method.
S54 Matrix Spikes
M1a0t0rnigx/sLpiukseisngwealrlecpormeppoaruenddsfoorfeinvteerryesfti.eldMsaatmrpixlesp(iekxeclruedcionvgerbileasnkasr) gativaecnoninceAntttraactihomnenotf
--
na
000157
C. All laboratory matrix spikes showed recoveriesofall compounds between 70-130% Field spikes were prepared on sample MC-101H at a concentration of 100 ng/L using all compounds of interest. Field spike recoveries are also given in Attachment C. PFOSA showed low recovery in the field spike. All other compounds showed recoveries between 70-130%. 55 Duplicates All field samples (excluding blanks) were analyzed in duplicate. Results are given along with the sample results in Attachment B. 5.6 Laboratory ControlSamples Milliq water was spiked with all compoundofinterest at 25 and 250 ng/L. All recoveries for all compounds were between 70-130% in each LCS. Recoveries are given with the raw data in Attachment D. 5.7 Sample Related Comments Field blank samples consisted ofempty containers. Forty millilitersof type I water filtered through a hypercarb cartridge was added to the empty container and analyzed in the same manner as the other samples. Data Summary Please see Attachment B for a detailed listingof the analytical results Data/Sample Retention Samples are disposedof one month after the report is issued unless otherwise specified. All electronic data is archived on retrievable media and hard copy reports are stored in data folders maintained by Centre. Attachments 11 Attachment A: Chain-of-Custody 12 Attachment B: Results. 83 Attachment C: Matrix Spike Recoveries (Field and Laboratory Spikes) 84 Attachment D: LC/MS/MS Raw Analytical Data
Dr Iti some Ror FOS ppenic.
ws
000158
9 Signatures
-- John M. Flaherty, Operati_ ons Manager -- Date e
Kevin JLioyd, Vice President
Date
Other Lab Members Contributing to Data EKanraeknshSamiWtihckromesinhe David Boll
Dv nil sent Report POS Append
ne
000159
Analytical Results W1973 Cleveland,
Tennesse
Id3eMntSifaimcpaltieon MC-101H
MC-103H
MC-106H NA
NAMC-107H
MC-108H
DeSsacmrpilpetion
Site 1 PIN Surface Water
Site 1 P/N Surface Water
Duplicate
Site 2 P/N Surface Water Site 2 P/N Surface Water Duplicate
SSiittee 33 PPI/NN SSuurrffaaccee WWaatteerr Duplicate
Field Blank P/N
Empty
PFOS (ng/L) (PnFglOLS)A
14.7 .J 564
< 25
<25
< 25
<25
< 25
<25
<< 2255
<<2255
<25
<25
POAA (nglL)
16.74
<25
<25 <25
<<2255
<25
eJs--tiCmoatmepdovuanldue.is present, but below the reporting limit of 25 ng/L. The result is an Method Detection Limits are approximately 2.5 nglL for PFOS and PFOSA and 7.5
ng/L for POAA,
OviAsner spor PROS pnts
wr 0001.50
Analytical Report
Fluorochemical Characterization of Surface Water Samples
Decatur, Alabama (W1979)
Centre Analytical Laboratory Report No. 023-0148
------------eee ee i
Testing Laboratory
Centre Analytical Laboratory, Inc. 3048 Research Drive
State College, PA 16801
3M Environmental Laboratory Contact
Kent R. Lindstrom Bldg. 2-3E-09 P.O. Box 33331
St. Paul, MN 55133-3331 Phone: (651) 778-5352
Requester
Kris J. Hansen, Ph.D. 3M Environmental Technology & Safety Services
Bldg. 2-3E-09 P.O. Box 33331 St. Paul, MN 55133-3331
ous.Introduction
Results are reported for the analysis oaf seriesof surface water samples received by Centre Analytical Laboratories, Inc. (Centre) from the 3M Environmental Laboratory. The samples
were collected from Decatur, Alabama. The Centre study number assigned to the project is 023-
Specific fluorochemical characterization by liquid chromatography / tandem mass spectrometry (LC/MS/MS) was requested for all samples. A totalof 9 samples were received for analysis.
Ort itcseersPFS.Appnd1c
i0s 00161
`The samples were fluorochemicals:
prepared
and
analyzed
by
LC/MS/MS
for
the
following
list
of
Table I: Target Analysis
[ CompoundN|ame
`oTnhefialneawliyttihcaClenmteret.hoDdautsaepdrewsaesntveadlihdearteedisbtyheCehnitgrhee.stTqhuealviatlyiddaattaioanvpairloatbolceolatatnhdisretsiumlet.s are Sample Receipt Tinhdeivsiadmupallessamwpelree csounbtmaiitnteerds iwnerinedirveicdeuiavledp.laSstaimcpcloentMaCin-e2rs02anHdwwaesrenontotanparleysezrevdeda.s pNerincelient r0e5q/u0e3s/t0.0.(E-Tmhaeilsacmopmlmeunciolclaetcitoionn fdraotmesKwreirseHanontsesnupoplnie5d/1.6/C0h0)a.inS-oafm-pcluesstowdeyreinrfeocremiavteidononis presented in Attachment A.
Holding Times
`The analytical stabilityof the
method used was validated against a maximum holding timeof analytesofinterest for longer periods has not been determined.
14
days.
The
Methods - Analytical and Preparatory 41 LOMSMS 4.11 Sample Preparation for LC/MS/MS Analysis
Sraemmpolveesrweseirdeuailnicthilaolrliynter.eaStoeldidwipthhas2e00exutLracotfi2o5n0(SmPgE/)Lwsaosdiusuemdtthoiopsruelpfaatree stohleustiaomnpltoes cfaorrtrLiCdg/e.MST/hMeScaanratlryisdigse. waAsffoirrtsty-emliultlelditweirtphor5timoLnooffs4a0m%plmeewtahasntorlanisnfewrarteedrtsoolautCi,o,n.SPE "mTlhepoerltuiaotne wofasmedtihsacnaorldewdaasndcotlhleecStPedEfcoorlaunamlnyswiassbtyheLnC/elMuSt/edMSwi.thTh1i0s0t%remaettmheanntolr.esuAlte5d in an cight-fold concentrationof the samples priotro analysis.
41.3 Sample Analysis by LC/MS/MS
cTnhrHoPmLatCo,graanpahliicqucootluomfenx.traBcatsesdionnjetchteedafafninditpyaosfstehdetharnoaulgytheafloirqtuhied-spthaatsieonary phase in
athmeoucnotluomfntirmeel.atiFveoltlootwhiengliHquPidLmCobsieplaerapthiaosne,, EtShe/aMnSalpyrtoeviisderestaairnaepdidfaonardcahcacruarctaetreistic
mEleeacntsrofsoprraaynailsygzeinnegraalwlyidoeperraantgeed oaftorreglaantiivcelcyommiploduntedmsp,eriantculruedsi;ngmoflleuocruolcehsemairceailosn.ized,
fragmented, and detected. Ions quantitated against standards.
characteristicofknown
fluorochemicals
are
observed
and
ra ntlAssis Ror FOS Append
wo
000152
AuseHdewtloeatnta-lPyazcekatrhed sHaPm1p1l0e0exHtrPaLctCs.sAynsatleymsicsouwpalsedpetrofaorMmiecdroumsiansgssUellteictmeadMreSa/ctMiSonwas m5/o1n9i/t0o0rianngd(5S/R2M0/)0.0.SaTmhpeleHsPwLeCreaenxdtrMaSct/eMd Sonm5e/t1h6o/d0s0uasneddafnoarlaynzaeldysbiys ManSd/MinSstbreutmewneten `parameters can be found in attachment D.
Analysis
SI Calibration
Afor7-tphoeicntomcaploiubrnadtsioonfciuntrevreeswta.sTahnealcyazleidbraattitohne bpoeignitnsniwnegreanpdreepnadorfedthate0a,na2l5y,ti5c0a,l 1s0e0q,ue25n0c,e
p5l0o0t,teadndfo1r 0e0a0chnpgo/iLnt(.pptU)siTnhgelrienesaprornesgeroefsstihoenqwuiatnhti1t/axtiwoenigihotnivnegr,stuhse tshleopceo,ncye-innttreartcieopnt waansd
ccaolrirberlaattiioonn ccuorevfefiicsieanctcep(1t)abalnedifco>eff0i.c9i8e5nt(
of >
determination 0.970).
()
were
determined.
A
Calibration standards are prepared using the same SPE procedure used for samples. Cinajleicbtriaotniso)nthcrhoeucgkhousttatnhdeaarndaslywseisreseqauneanlcyez.edCopmeprliioadniccaelliys o(betvaeirnyeditfhtrheee sttoanfdiavred sanaamlpyltee concentrations are within +/-20%ofthe actual value.
For the results reported here, calibration criteria were met.
52 Blanks
eExxttrraaccttiioonnbbllaannkkssswheorueldprneoptahreadveanadnyantaarlgyezteadnwaliyttheesvperreyseenxttraatctoiroanbboavtechtohfe csoanmcpelnetsr.atTihoen
of the low-level calibration standard. compliant.
For these samples, the extraction blanks were
Ilenvsetlrucamleinbtrabtliaonnksstainndtahred,foarnmdoaffctlereaknnomwenthhaingohl-lseovlevlenstamwpelrese.alAsogaainna,lytzheedblaafnlksesvheoruylhdingoht-
have any target analytes present at or samples presented here the instrument
above blanks
the are
low-level compliant
calibration
standard.
For the
53 Surrogates Surrogate spikes arc not a component of the LC/MS/MS analytical method.
5.5 Matrix Spikes 1M0at0rnigx/Lspiukseisngwealrlecpormeppoaurenddsfoorfevinetreyrefsite.ldMsaatmrpixlesp(iekxecrleucdoivnegribelsanakrse) gativaecnoinnceAntttraactihomnenotf C. All laboratory matrix spikes showed recoveriesofall compounds between 70-130%
cFioemlpdosupnidkessowferineteprersetp.areFdieolnd ssapmikpelereMcCov-e2r0ie1sHarate aalcsooncgeinvternatiinonAtotfa1c0h0menngt/LC.usiPnFgOalSl
showed high 70-130%.
recovery
in
the
field
spike.
All
other compounds
showed
recoveries
between
Dra nilsscsmReerposrtPOS-Append
"5001.63
57 Duplicates
All field samples (excluding blanks) were analyzed in duplicate. with the sample results in Attachment B.
Results are given along
5.8 Laboratory Control Samples Mfoirllaillqcwoamteprouwnadssspwiekreedbweittwheaelnl c7o0m-p1o3u0n%dinofeaicntherLeCsSt.at 2Re5caonvedr2i5es0 anrge/Lg.ivAelnlwrietchovtehreies raw data in Attachment D.
5.7 Sample Related Comments
Field blank samples consistedof empty containers. filtered through a hypercarb cartridge was added to
Forty milliliters of type the empty container and
I water analyzed
in
the same manner as the other samples.
Data Summary Please sec AttachmentB fora detailed listing of the analytical results
Data/Sample Retention `Samples are disposedofone month afte the report is issued unless otherwise specified. All
electronic data is archived on retrievable media and hard copy reports are stored in data folders maintained by Centre,
Attachments 13 Attachment A: Chain-of-Custody 14 Attachment B: Results. 83 Attachment C: Matrix Spike Recoveries (Field and Laboratory Spikes)
84 Attachment D: LC/MS/MS Raw Analytical Data
rat niin sss Report PROS Append 1
"$00164
9 Signatures
John M. Fiaherty, ManagerOperations Manager
Date
TE
KevinJ Lloyd, Vice President
Date
`Other Lab Members Contributing to Data KEanraeknshSamiWtihckremesinhe David Bell
Dv nit AssessmentReportPFOS- Append If
maz 000165
Analytical Results W1979 Decatur, Alabama
3M Sample Identification
Sample Description
PFOS (ng/L) PFOSA (nglL)
POAA (nglL)
MC-201H MC-203H MC-206H NA MC-207H NA MC-208H MC-284H NA
Site 1 P/N Surface Water 23.1J
<25
924
Site 1 P/N Surface Water ~~ 8.3
<25
<25
Duplicate
Site 2 PIN Surface Water 14.5 J
<25
<25
Site 2 P/N Surface Water 22.0 J
<25
1.19
Duplicate
Site 3 P/N Surface Water ~~ <25 Site 3 P/N Surface Water ~~ <25
<25 <25
<25 <25
Duplicate
Field Blank P/N Empty
<25
<25
<25
Quiet PIN Surface
108
18.94
63.1
Water
Quiet P/N Surface Water ~~ 114 Duplicate
18.14
57.3
J = Compound is present, but below the reporting limit of 25 ng/L. The result is an estimated value,
Method ng/L for
Detection POAA.
Limits
are
approximately
2.5
ng/L
for
PFOS
and
PFOSA
and
7.5
Dr na cstRepo PFOS Appi 1
as
000166
Analytical Report
Fluorochemical Characterizationof Surface WaterSamples
Pensacola, FI (W2176)
Centre Analytical Laboratory Report No. 023-014C
e--e--------remeere------eme
Testing Laboratory
oe
Centre Analytical Laboratory, Inc. 3048 Research Drive
State College, PA 16801
ST
iis
3M Environmental Laboratory Contact
Kent R. Lindstrom Bldg. 2-3E-09
P.O. Box 33331 St. Paul, MN 55133-3331 Phone: (651) 778-5352
e-- e ----------------
Requester
Kris J. Hansen, Ph.D.
3M Environmental Technology & Safety Services Bldg. 2-3E-09
P.O. Box 33331 St. Paul, MN 55133-3333
Introduction
Results are reported for the analysis ofa seriesofsurface water samples received by Centre Analytical Laboratories, Inc. (Centre) from the 3M Environmental Laboratory. The samples.
were collected from Pensacola, FI. The Centre study number assigned to the project is 023-014.
Specific fluorochemical characterization by liquid chromatography/ tandem mass spectrometry
(LC/MS/MS) was requested for all samples. A total of 8 samples were received foranalysis.
Dr iiAssen epor PEOS Append
wae 000167
`The samples were fluorochemicals:
prepared
and
analyzed
by
LC/MS/MS
for
the
following
lst
of
Table 1: Target Analysis
[CC CompoundName
[1]
[ Perfluor Sulo fonao te| ct _a_ n| e
CC Perfluorcocta| n_c__ate
o`TnhefialneawliyttihcCalenmteret.hoDdautsaepdrewsaesntveadlihdearteedisbtyheCehnitgrhee.stTqhuealviatlyiddaattiaoanvpairloatbolceolatatnhdisretsiumlet.s are
Sample Receipt `iTnhdeivsiadmupallessawmpelree csounbtmaiitnteerds iwnerinedirveicdeuiavledp.laSstaimcpcloenstawienreresraencediwveedreonno0t5/p0r3e/s0e0r.vedT.heSisxatmepelne collection dates were not supplied. Chain-of-custody information is presented in Attachment A.
Holding Times
`The analytical stabilityofthe
maneatlhyotdesuosfeidntwearessvtafloirdaltoendgeargapienrsitoadsmhaaxsinmout mbeheonlddientgertmiimneeod.f
14
days.
The
Methods - Analytical and Preparatory 41 LOMS/MS 4.11 Sample Preparation for LC/MS/MS Analysis
rSaemmpolveesrweseirdeuailnicthilaolrliynter.eaStoeldidwipthhas2e00exutrLacotfi2o5n0(SmPgE/)Lwsaosduisuemdtthoiopsruelpfaatree stohleustiaomnpltoes cfaorrtLriCd/geM.ST/hMeScaanratlryisdigse.waAsffoirrtsty-lmuiltleidltweirtphor5tmioLnooffs4a0m%plmeewtahasntorlanisnfewrarteedrtsoolautCi,o,n.SPE `mTlhepoerltuiaotneowfasmedtihsacnaorldewdaasndcotlhleecStPedEfcorolanuamlnyswiassbtyhLenC/elMuSt/eMd Sw.ithTh1i0s0t%remaettmheanntolre.suAlted in an cight-fold concentrationofthe samples prior to analysis. 4.1.4 Sample Analysis by LC/MS/MS In HPLC, an aliquotofextract is injected and passed through a liquid-phase cthherocmoaltuomgnrarpehliatcivceoltoumtnh.e lBiqausieddmoonbitlhee pahffaisnei,tytohfe atnhaelayntaeliystereftoarintehde fsotrataiocnhaarraycptheraissetiicn `ammeoaunnstfoofr atniamle.yziFnogllaowwiidneg rHaPngLeCofsoepragraantiiocn,coEmSp/oMunSdpsr,oviindcelusdainrgapfilduoarnodchaecmciucraaltse. Eflreacgtmreonstperda,y ainsdgedneetercatleldy. opTeornastecdhaartacrteelraitsitviecloyfmiklndotwenmpfelruaotruorcehse;mmiocallescualreesoabrseerivoenidzeadn,d quantitated against standards.
Dra ilAssen:ReportPROS Append
was
00018
AuseHdewtloeatnta-lPyazcekatrhed sHaPm1p1l0e0exHtrPaLctCs.sAynsatleymsicsouwpalsedpetrofaorMmiecdroumsiansgssUelltecitmeadMreSa/ctMiSonwas m5/o1n9i/t0o0.riTnghe(SHRPM)L.CSaanmdpMleSs/wMeSremeextthroadcsteudsoend 5f/or17a/n0a0lyasnisd aanndaliynzsetdrubmyenMtSp/aMraSmeotners can be found in attachment D.
Analysis
5.1 Calibration
Afor7-tphoeicntomcaploiubrnadtsioonficnutrevreeswta.sTahnealcyazleidbraattitohne bpoeignitnsniwnegreanpdreepnadorfedthate0a,n2al5y,ti5c0a,l 1s0e0q,ue2n5c0e,.
p5l0o0t,teadndfor10e0a0chnpgo/iLnt(.ppUt)siTnhgelrienesaprornesgeroefsstihoenqwuiatnhti1t/axtiwoenigihotnivnegr,stuhse tshleopceo,ncye-innttreartcieopnt waansd
ccaolrirberlaattiioonn ccuorevfefiicsieanctcep(rt)abalnedifcro>ef0fi.c9i8e5nt(o1>f
determination 0.970),
()
were
determined.
A
Calibration standards are prepared using the same SPE procedure used for samples. Cinajleicbtriaotniso)nthcrhoeucgkhousttatnhdeaarndaslywseisreseqauneanlcyez.edCopmeprliioadinccaelliys o(betvaeirnyeditfhrtehee sttoanfdiavred asnaamlpyltee concentrations are within +/-20%ofthe actual value.
For the results reported here, calibration criteria were met.
52 Blanks
eExxttrraaccttiioonnbbllaannkkssswheorueldprneoptahreadveanadnyantaarlgyezteadnwaliyttheesvperreyseenxttraatcotiroanbboavtechtohfe csoanmcpelnetsr.atTihoen
of the low-level calibration standard. compliant.
For these samples, the extraction blanks were
lIenvsetlrcuamleinbtrabtliaonnkssitanntdhared,foarnmdoaffctlereaknnomwetnhhaingohl-sloevlevlenstawmpelrees.alAsogaainna,lytzheedbalfatneksevsehroyulhdingoht-
have any target analytes present at or samples presented here the instrument
above blanks
the are
low-level compliant.
calibration
standard.
For the
53 Surrogates Surrogate spikes are not a component ofthe LC/MS/MS analytical method.
5.6 Matrix Spikes M1a0t0rnigx/sLpiukseisngwealrlecpormeppoaurenddsfoorfevinetreryesfti.eldMsaatmrpixlesp(iekxeclruedcionvgerbileasnkarse) gativaecnoninceAntttraactihomnenotf C. All laboratory matrix spikes showed recoveriesofall compounds between 70-130%
Field spikes compounds
were prepared on of interest. Field
sample MC-301H at spike recoveries are
a concentration of 100 ng/L also given in Attachment C.
using all All field
spikes showed recoveriesofall compounds between 70-130%.
Of nia AsrsmenReposPFS-Append 1
us
000159
59 Duplicates
All field samples (excluding blanks) were analyzed in duplicate. with the sample results in Attachment B.
Results are given along
5.10 Laboratory Control Samples Mfoirllaillq cwoamteprouwnadssspwiekreedbweittwheaelnl c7o0m-p1o3u0n%dionfeaicntherLeCstS.at R2e5caonvedr2i5es0 anrge/Lg.ivAelnl wriectohvtehreies raw data in Attachment D.
5.7 Sample Related Comments
Field blank samples consistedofempty containers. filtered through a hypercarb cartridge was added to
Forty millilitersof typIe water the empty container and analyzed
in
the same manner as the other samples.
Data Summary Please sce Attachment B for adetailed listingof the analytical results.
Data/Sample Retention
Samples are disposed of one month afte the report is issued unless otherwise specified. All
electronic data is archived on folders maintained by Centre,
retrievable
media
and
hard
copy
reports
are
stored
in
data
Attachments 15 Attachment A: Chain-of-Custody 16 Attachment B: Results. 83 Attachment C: Matrix Spike Recoveries (Field and Laboratory Spikes) 84 Auachment D; LC/MS/MS Raw Analytical Data
Dr IiAssen ReprPOS Appencic
war
0001770
9 Signatures
JohnM. Faherty, Operations Manager KeJLvoydi,Vince President
Other Lab Members Contibuting to Data EKanraeknshSamiWtihckremesinhe David Bell
Tate
--
Date
Dra ilAsset Report POS ppentic
as
000171
Analytical Alabama
Results
W1979
Decatur,
Id3eMntSifaimcpaltieon DeSsacmrpilpteion
PFOS (ng/L) PFOSA (nglL)
POAA (ng/L)
MC-201H MC-203H MNCA-206H MNCA-207H MC-208H MC-284H NA
Site 1 PIN Surface Water Site 1 PIN Surface Water
23.1.J 8.3J
<25 <25
924 <25
DSiutpeli2caPtIeN Surface Water 14.5J <25
<25
Si2tPIeN Surface Water Duplicate
22.0.J
<25
1.19
Site Site
3 3
PIN PIN
Surface Surface
Water Water
<25 <25
<25 <25
<25 <25
Duplicate
Field Blank PIN
<25
<25
<25
QEumipettyPIN Surface
108
18.94
63.1
Water
Quiet P/N Surface Water Duplicate
114
18.19
57.3
J - Compound is estimated value.
present,
but
below the
reporting
limit of 25
ng/L.
The
result
is
an
Method ng/L for
DPeOtAeAct.ion
Limits
are
approximately
2.5
ngiL
for
PFOS
and
PFOSA
and
7.5
Dra nitAsses Repo POS ppei
wa
000172
Analytical Report
Fluorochemical Characterization of Surface WaterSamples
Mobile, Alabama (W2151)
Centre Analytical Laboratory Report No. 023-014D
-- eee--r---- Testing Laboratory Centre Analytical Laboratory, Inc. 3048 Research Drive State College, PA 16801 --eeeeee---- 3M Environmental Laboratory Contact Kent R. Lindstrom Bldg. 2-3E-09 P.O. Box 33331 StP.hoPnauel:, (M6N51)55717383--53335321 nnn Requester Kris J. Hansen, Ph.D. 3M Environmental Technology & Safety Services Bldg. 2-3E-09 P.O. Box 33331 St. Paul, MN 55133-3331 Introduction 014Results are reported for the analysis ofa seriesofsurface water samples received by Centre Analytical Laboratories, Inc. (Centre) from the 3M Environmental Laboratory. The samples were collected from Mobile, Alabama. The Centre study number assigned to the project is 023-
Specific fluorochemical characterization by liquid chromatography/ tandem mass spectrometry
(LC/MS/MS) was requested for all samples. A total of8 samples were received for analysis.
DrtasceaesPmOS ppd1
ao 000173
The samples were fluorochemicals:
prepared
and
analyzed
by
LC/MS/MS
for
the
following
lst
of
Table I: Target Analysis
o`TnheflaenawliyttihcaClenmteret.hoDdautsaepdrewsaesntveadlihdearteedisbtyheCehnitgrhee.stTqhuealviatlyiddaattaioanvpairloatbolceolatatnhdisretsiumlet.s are `Sample Receipt i`Tnhdeivsiadmupallessamwpelree csounbtmaiitnteerds iwnerinedrievciediuavledp.laSstaimcpcloenstawienreersraencediwveedreonno0t5/p0re3s/e0r0v.edT.heEisgahmtple collection dates were not supplied. Chain-of-custody information is presented in Attachment A. Holding Times sTthaebilaintaylyotfictahle maneatlhyotdesuosfedinwtearsesvtafloirdaltoendgeargapienrsitoadsmhaaxsinmoutmbeheonlddientgertmiimneedo.f 14 days. The
Methods - Analytical and Preparatory 41 LOMSMS 4.11 Sample Preparation for LC/MS/MS Analysis
rSeammpolveesrweseirdeuailnicthilaolrliynter.eaStoeldidwipthhas2e00exutLr.aocfti2o5n0(SmPgE/)Lwsaosduisuemdtthoiopsruelpfaatree stohleustiaomnplteos cfaorrtrLiCdg/e.MST/hMeScaanratlryisdigse. waAsffoirrtsty-emliultleldtweirtphorStmioLn ooffs4a0m%plmeewtahasntorlanisnfewrarteedrtsoolautCioon.SPE mTlhepoerltuiaotneowfamsetdihsacnaorldewdaasndcotlhleecStPedEfcorolaunamlnyswiassbythLenC/elMuSt/edMSwi.thTh1i0s0t%remaettmheanntolr.esuAlte5d in an cight-fold concentrationof the samples prior to analysis 4.15 Sample Analysis by LC/MS/MS
cInhrHoPmLatCo,graanpahliicqucootluomfne.xtrBaacsteids ionnjetchteedafafninditpyaosfsetdhetharnoaulygtheafloirqtuhied-sptahtaisoenary phase in
athmeoucnotloufmntirmeel.atiFveoltlootwhiengliHquPidLmCobsieplaerapthiaosne,,EtShe/aMnSalpyrtoeviisdersetaairnaepdidfoarnacdhaarcaccutraetreistic
Emleeacntsrofsoprraaynailsygzeinnegraalwlyidoeperraantgeedoaft orrelgaatniivcelcyommiploduntedmsp,eriantculruedsi;ngmoflleucoruolcehsemaircailosn.ized,
fragmented, and detected. lons quantitated against standards.
characteristicofknown
fluorochemicals
arc
observed
and
Dre iilAsssmes Ber POS Append
war
000174
AuseHdewtloeatnta-lPyazcekatrhed sHaPm1p1l0e0exHtrPacLtsC. sAynsatleymsicsouwpalsedpetrofaorMmiecdroumsiansgssUellteictmeadMreSa/ctMiSonwas `5m/o20n/i0t0o.rinTgh(eSHRMP)L.CSaanmdplMeSs/wMerSemeextthraocdtsedusoend5f/o1r7a/n0a0laysnids aannadlyiznesdtrbuymeMntS/paMrSamoenters an be found in attachment D.
Analysis
SI Calibration
Afor7-tphoeicntomcaploiubrnadtsioonficnutrevreeswta.sTahnealcyazleidbraattitohne bpoeignitnsniwnegraenpdreepnadrofedthate0a,n2al5y,ti5c0a,l1s0e0q,ue25n0c,e
5pl0o0t,teadndfor10e0a0chnpgo/iLnt(.ppUt)siTnhgelriencsaprornesgeroefstshioenqwuiatnhti1taxtiwoenigihotninvge,rstuhsetshleopceo,nyc-einnttreartcieopnt waansd.
correlation calibration
coefficient (r) and coefficient of curve is acceptable if > 0.985 ( >
determination 0.970).
()
were
determined.
A
Calibration standards are prepared using the same SPE procedure used for samples.
iCnajleicbtriaotniso)nthcrhoeucgkhousttatnhdeaarndaslywsiesreseqauneanlcyez.edCompeprliioadniccaellisyob(teaveirnyedtihftrehee sttoanfdiavred sanaamlpyltee `concentrations are within +/-20%ofthe actual value.
For the results reported here, calibration criteria were met
52 Blanks
eExxttrraaccttiioonnbbllaannkksswsheoruelpdrneoptarheadveanadnyantaarlgyeztedanwailyttheesvperreyseenxttraatcotiroanbboavtechtohfe csoanmcpelnetsr.atTihoen
of the low-level compliant.
calibration
standard.
For these samples, the extraction blanks were
Ilenvsetlrcuamleinbtrabtliaonnksstainndtahred,foarnmdofaftcelrekannomwetnhhaingohl-lseovlevlenstamwpelrese.alAsogaainna,lytzheedblafatnekrsesvheoruylhdingoht-
have any target analytes present at or samples presented here the instrument
above blanks
the are
low-level compliant,
calibration
standard.
For the
53 Surrogates Surrogate spikes are not a component of the LC/MS/MS analytical method.
5.7 Matrix Spikes M1a0t0rnigx/sLpiukseisngwealrlecpormeppoaruenddsfoorfevinetreryesfti.eldMsaatmrpixlesp(iekxeclruedcionvgerbileasnkasr)e agtivaecnoinnceAntttraactihomnenotf oC.thePr OcoAmAposuhnodwsedshloowwemdatmraitxrisxpiskpeikreescorveecroiveesriienssbaemtpwleeesnM7C0--410307%HiannadllMsCa-m4p8le4sH.. All
cFioemlpdosupnidkess owferienteprreespt.aredFioenldsaspmipklee rMeCc-ov4e0ri1eHs aatrea caolnsocengtirvaetnioinnoAft1t0a0chnmge/nLtuCs.ingAallll
`compounds showed recoveries between 70-130%.
Dr ni sscsmentReposPEOS Append 1
maz
000175
S11 Duplicates All field samples (excluding blanks) were analyzed in duplicate. Results are given along with the sample results in Attachment B.
5.12 Laboratory Control Samples Mfoirllaillqcwoamteprouwnadssspwiekreedbweittwheaelnl c7o0m-p1o3u0n%dinofeaicntherLeCstS.at 2Re5caonvedr2i5es0 anrge/Lg.ivAelnlwrietchovtehreies raw data in Attachment D.
5.7 Sample Related Comments
Field blank samples consistedofempty containers. filtered through a hypercarb cartridge was added to
Forty millilitersof type the empty container and
I water analyzed
in
the same manner as the other samples.
Data Summary Please see Attachment B for a detailed listingofthe analytical results.
Data/Sample Retention
Samples are disposedof one month afte the report is issued unless otherwise specified. All
electronic data is archived on folders maintained by Centre.
retrievable
media
and
hard
copy
reports
are
stored
in
data
Attachments 17 Attachment A: Chain-of-Custody 18 Attachment B: Results. 83 Attachment C: Matrix Spike Recoveries (Field and Laboratory Spikes) 84 Attachment D: LC/MS/MS Raw Analytical Data
Dra IlAsset Repo FOS Appenic
wa
000176
9 Signatures
John M. Faherty, Manager-Operations Manager
Date
Kevin J Loyd, Vice President
Date
Other Lab Members Contributing to Data KEanraeknshSaiWtihckremesinhe David Boll
rat tilAssRoarPmOS Append
mas
00dL77
Analytical Report
Fluorochemical Characterization of Surface Water Samples Columbus, GA (W2336)
Centre Analytical Laboratory Report No. 023-014E
Testing Laboratory
Centre Analytical Laboratory, Inc. 3048 Research Drive
State College, PA 16801
3M Environmental Laboratory Contact
Kent R. Lindstrom Bldg. 2-3E-09 P.O. Box 33331
St. Paul, MN 55133-3331 Phone: (651) 778-5352
Requester
Kris J. Hansen, Ph.D.
3M Environmental Technology & Safety Services
Bldg. 2-3E-09 P.O. Box 33331 St. Paul, MN 55133-3331
Introduction
Results are reported for the analysisof a seriesof surface water samples received by Centre Analytical Laboratories, Inc. (Centre) from the 3M Environmental Laboratory. The samples.
`owre.re collected from Columbus, GA. The Centre study number assigned to the project is 023-
Specific fluorochemical characterization by liquid chromatography / tandem mass spectrometry
(LC/MS/MS) was requested for all samples. A total of8 samples were received for analysis.
Dr titAssepePnOS Append
was 000178
`The samples were fluorochemicals:
prepared
and
analyzed
by
LC/MS/MS
for
the
following
list
of
Table I: Target Analysis
CompowndName
[1]
[PerfluoSr ulfo onatoe c| ta _n| e
L[L PerPef rflul orou octao ncSaur tlefoo nylo amic de |t | an ] e|
o`TnhefialneawliyttihcCalenmteret.hoDdautsaepdrewsaesntveadlihdearteedisbtyheCehnitgrhee.stTqhuealviatlyiddaattaioanvpairloatbolceolatanthdisretsiumlet.s are Sample Receipt `iTnhdeivsiadmupallessamwpelree csounbtmaiitnteerds iwnerinedirveciediuvaeld.plaSstaimcpcloenstawienreersraencediwveerdeonno0t5/pr0e3s/e0r0v.ed.TheEisgahmtple collection dates were not supplied. Chain-of-custody information is presented in Attachment A. Holding Times s`tTahbeilaintaylyotfictahle maneatlhyotdesuosfedinwtaersesvtafloirdaltoendgeargapienrsitoadsmhaaxsinmout mbeheonlddientgertmiimneedo.f 14 days. The
Methods - Analytical and Preparatory 41 LOMSMS 4.1.1 Sample Preparation for LC/MS/MS Analysis
r`Seammopvleesrweseirdeuailnicthilaolrliynet.reaStoeldidwipthhas2e00exutLracotfi2o5n0(SmPgE/)Lwsaosdiusuemdtthoiopsruelpfaatree stohleustiaomnpltoes cfaorrtrLiCdg/e.MST/hMeScaanratlryisdigse. wAasffoirrtsty-emliultlelditweirtphor5tmioLnooffs4a0m%plmeewtahasntorlanisnfewrarteedrtsoolautCi,o,n.SPE m`Tlhepoerltuiatoen owfamsedtihsacnaorldewdaasndcotlhleecStPedEfcoorlaunamlnyswiassbtyhLenC/elMuSt/edMSwi.thTh1i0s0t%remaettmheanntolre.suAlted in an cight-fold concentrationofthe samples prior to analysis 4.1.6 Sample Analysis by LC/MS/MS
cTnhrHoPmLatCo,graanpahliicqucootloufmenx.traBcatseids oinnjetchteedafafninditpyaosfstedhetharnoaulgytheafloirqtuhied-spthaatsieo.nary phase in
athmeocuonltuomfntriemlea.tiFveoltlootwhiengliHquPidLmCobsieplaerapthiaosne,, EtShe/aMnSalpyrtoeviisdreestaairnaepdidfoarnad cahcacruarctaetreistic
`Emleeactnrsofsoprraaynailsygzeinnegraallwyidoeperraantgeedoaft orrelgaatniivcelcyommiploduntedmsp,eriantculruedsi;ngmoflleuocruolcehsemairceailosn.ized,
fragmented, and detected. Tons quantitated against standards.
characteristic
of
known
fluorochemicals
are
observed
and
Dr ni sscsmens Repos PEOS Append 1
nas
000173
AuseHdewtloeatnta-lPyazcekatrhed sHaPm1p1l0e0exHtrPacLtsC. sAynsatleymsicsouwpalsedpetrofaorMmiecdroumsiansgssUellteictmeadMreSa/ctMiSonwas m5/o2n0i/t0o0rianngd(5S/R2M1)/.00.SaTmhpeleHsPwLeCreanedxtMraSc/teMdSonme5t/h1o8d/0s0uasnedd afnoralaynzaeldysbisyaMnSd/iMnsStrbuemtewneten parameters can be found in attachment D,
Analysis SI Calibration
Afor7-tphoeicntomcaploiubrnadtsionofcuinrtveerewsta.sTahnealcyazleidbraattitohne bpeoginitnsniwnegreanpdreepnadorfedthate0a,na2l5y,ti5c0a,l 1s0e0q,ue25n0c,e 500, and 1000 ng/L (ppt) The response of the quantitation ion versus the concentration was pcloortrteeldaftoiorneaccohefpfoiicnite.ntUs(ri)ngalnidneacroreefgfirceisesnitonofwitdeht1e/rxmiwneaitgihotning(,)thewesrloepe,deyt-eirnmteirnceedp.t anAd calibration curve is acceptable if>r 0.985 ( > 0.970).
Calibration standards are prepared using the same SPE procedure used for samples.
Cinajleicbtriaotniso)nthcrhoeucgkhousttatnhdeaarndaslywsiesreseqauneanlcyez.edCompeprliioadniccaelliys
(every obtained
three ifthe
to five standard
sample analyte
concentrations are within +/-20%ofthe actual value.
For the results reported here, calibration criteria were met.
52 Blanks
eExxttrraaccttiioonnbbllaannkkssswheorueldprneoptahraedveanandyatnaarlgyezteadnwaliyttheesvperreyseenxttraatcotiroanbboavtechthoefcsoanmcpelnetsr.atTihoen
of the low-level calibration standard. compliant.
For these samples, the extraction blanks were
Ilenvsetlrucamleinbtrabtliaonnksstainndtahred,foarnmdoaffctlereaknnomwetnhhaingohl-lseovlevlenstamwpelrees.alAsogaainna,lytzheedblafalnekrsesvheoruylhdingoht-
have any target analytes present at or samples presented here the instrument
above blanks
the are
low-level compliant.
calibration
standard.
For the
53 Surrogates Surrogate spikes are not a component ofthe LC/MS/MS analytical method.
58 Matrix Spikes M10a0tinxg/sLpiukseisngwealrlecpormeppoaruenddfsoorfeivneterryesfti.eldMsaatmipxlesp(iekxeclruedcionvgerbileasnkasr)e agtivaecnoinnceAntttraactihomnenotf C.. All compounds showed matrix spike recoveries between 70-130% in all samples.
`Fcieolmdposupnikdessowfeirneteprersetp.arFeidelodnsspaimkpelreecMoCve-rSieOs1HareatalascoognicvenetnriantiAotntoafch1m0e0ntngC/.LTuhseinfgiealldl
spike results showed low recovery recoveries between 70-130%.
for
PFOSA.
All
other
compounds
showed
matrix
spike
rat nial sso Repos PROS Append 1
war
000180
513 Duplicates
All samples (excluding blanks) were analyzed in duplicate. sample results in Attachment B.
Results are given along with the
5.14 Laboratory Control Samples fMoirllaillqcwoamteprouwnadssspwiekreedbweittwheaelnl c7o0m-p1o3u0n%dionfienatcehrLesCtS.at R2e5sualnfds2a5r0e gnig/vLe.n aAllolngrewciotvhertihees raw data in Attachment D.
5.7 Sample Related Comments
Field blank samples consistedofempty containers. Forty millilitersof type I water
filtered through a the same manner
hypercarb cartridge as the other samples
was
added
to
the
empty
container
and
analyzed
in
Data Summary Please see Attachment B fora detailed listingof the analytical results Data/Sample Retention `Sampleeslaercetrdoinsipcodsaetdaofios narechmiovendthonafrteetrritehvearbelpeomrtediisaisasnudehdaurndlecsospyothreerpworitsseasrpeecsitfoireedd. iAnldlata
folders maintained by Centre,
Attachments 19 Attachment A: Chain-of-Custody 1.10 Attachment B: Results. 83 Attachment C: Matrix Spike Recoveries (Field and Laboratory Spikes) 84 Attachment D: LC/MS/MS Raw Analytical Data
Dra nial sss Report PROS Append 1
was
000181
9 Signatures
`John M. Flaherty, Manager-Operations Manager
Date
_--
KevinJ Lloyd, Vice President
Date
Other Lab Members Contributing to Data Enaksha Wickremesinhe Karon Smith David Bell
ref iit AssessRmeeponrt PF-ApOpenSd 1
mas 000182
Analytical Results W2336 Columbus, GA
3M Sample Identification
Sample Description
PFOS (ng/L) PFOSA (ngiL)
POAA (nglL)
MMCC--550013HH MNCA-506H NMCA-507H MC-508H MC-584H NA
Site Site
1 1
PIN PIN
Surface Surface
Water Water
63.8 59.9
Duplicate
Site Site
2 2
PIN PIN
Surface Surface
Water Water
~~
76.6 83.3
Duplicate
Site Site
3 3
PIN PIN
Surface Surface
Water Water
55.4 55.4
Duplicate
Field Blank-PIN
<25
QEumipettySurface Water
<25
QDuuipleitcSatuerface Water
<25
174 264 1324 256
1654 1764
26.4 267
1204 14.94
2364 243)
<25
<25
<25 <25
<25 <25
J~ Compound is estimated value.
present,
but
below the
reporting
limit of 25
ng/L.
The
result is
an
Method nglL for
DPeOtAeAct.ion
Limits
are
approximately
2.5
ng/L
for
PFOS
and
PFOSA
and
7.5
[
--
nso
000183
Analytical Report
Fluorochemical Characterization of Water and Sediment Samples
Port St. Lucie Resampling (E00-2003)
Centre Analytical Laboratory Report No. 023-014P
~------------------e-- e.
Testing Laboratory Centre Analytical Laboratory, Inc.
3048 Research Drive State College, PA 16801
eee emer 3M Environmental Laboratory Contact
Kent R. Lindstrom Bldg. 2-3E-09 P.O. Box 33331
St. Paul, MN 55133-3331 Phone: (651) 778-5352
eem------------------e--.
Requester
Dale Bacon Ph.D.
3M Environmental Technology & Safety Services
PB.0l.dg.Bo2x-33E3-30391
St. Paul, MN 55133-3331
Introduction
Results are reported for the analysisof a seriesofwater and sediment samples received by Centre
Analytical Laboratories, Inc. (Centre) from the 3M Environmental Laboratory. The samples
were collected from Port St. Lucie, Florida and are partof 3M
`study number assigned to the project is 023-014.
Project E00-2003.
The Centre
Specific fluorochemical characterization by liquid chromatography/ tandem mass spectrometry
(LC/MS/MS) and ion
received for analysis.
chromatography
was
requested
for
all
samples.
A total of45 samples were
Dr issepon rPEOS pent1
an 000184
The samples were fluorochemicals:
prepared
and
analyzed
by
LC/MS/MS
for
the
following
list
of
Table 1: Target Analysis
`The analytical methods protocol and results are
uosnefdifloe rwwitahteCrenstarme.pleTshewemreethvoaldisdawteerdebmyoCdeinftireed,
The validation for the sediment
psraemspelnetse,dhhoewreeviesrthtehehipgrhoecsetduqruaelsihtyavdeatnaotavbaeielanblfeulaltytvhailsitdiamtee.d for this matrix. Data
Sample Receipt
iTnhdeivsiadmupallessamwpelree csounbtmaiitnteerds iwnerinedirveciediuvaeld.plaSstaimcpcloenstawienreersraencediwveedreonno7t/2p5r/e0s0e.rveTdh.eFsoarmtpyl-efsive
were collected Attachment A.
between
7/18/00
and
7/19/00.
Chain-of-custody
information
is
presented
in
Holding Times a`fTtheeratnhailsyttiicmael pmeertihododhaussendotwbaesevnavlaildiadtaetdeda,gahionswtevaemraixt ishmouumldhboeldniontgedtitmheatoffie1l4ddfaoyrst.ifSitcaatbiiolnisty have shown acceptable recoveries at the 100 ng/L for periods longer than 14 days.
Methods - Analytical 41 LOMSMS
and
Preparatory
4.11 Sample Preparation for LC/MS/MS Analysis
tWoatreermosvaemprleessiduwaelrechilnoirtiinael.lyStorleiadtepdhwaistehe2xt0r0acutLioonf(2S5P0E)mgwa/sL susoeddiutmo ptrheipoasurlefattheesolution CsyasmpSlPeEs cfaorrtrLiCdg/e.MST/hMeScaanratlryisdigse.wAasfofirrtsyt-meillultielditweirtphorStimoLnooff4s0am%plmeewtahasntorlanisnfewrarteedrto a mseoltuhtainoonl..TAhe$emluLatepowratsiodniosfcamredtehdaannodl wthaesScPolEleccotleudmfnorwaansaltyhseins cblyutLeCd/wMiSth/M1S0.0%This treatment resulted in an eight-fold concentrationof the samples prior to analysis fFiorsrttehxetrsaecdtiemdeninttoan5dmslluodfgmeetshaamnpolle.s, Tahreeperxetsreancttastiwveerepofritlitoenroedfasnadmpdilleut(e5dgtroaamsf)inawlas `vmoalnunmeeroafs t4h0emwaLtewritshamTpylpees,Ibweagtienr.ninTghewidtihluttheedseoxltirdacpthsawseereexttrhaecntitorne.ated in the same. 4.1.7 Sample Analysis by LC/MS/MS
cInhrHoPmLatCo,graanpahliicqucootloufmenx.trBaactsesd ionnjetchteedafafninditpyoasfstehdetharnoaulygtheafloriqtuhied-spthaatisoenary phase in
Dra IlAsset Ror POS ppenic
wa
000155
tahmeoucnotloumfntirmeel.atiFveoltlootwhiengliHquPidLmCobseiplaerapthiaosne,, EtShe/aMnSalpyrtoeviisdersetaairnaepdidfoarnadcahcacruacrtaetreistic
mEleeacntsrofsoprraaynailsygzeinnegraalwlyidoeperraantgeedofatorreglaantiivcelcyommiploduntedmsp,eriantculruedsi;ngmoflleuocruolcehsemairceailosn.ized,
fragmented, and detected. lons quantitated against standards.
characteristic
of
known
fluorochemicalsare
observed
and
AuseHdewtloeatnta-lPyazcekatrhde sHaPm1p1l0e0exHtrPaLctCs.sAynsatleymsicsouwpalsedpetrofaorMmiecdroumsiansgssUelltecitmeadMreSa/ctMiSonwas `amnoanliytzoerdinbgy(MSRSM/)M.SWabettewreseanmp8/l1e8s/w0e0raendex8t/r2a3c/t0e0d.bSeetdwiemeenn8t/a15n/d0s0laundgde8s/a1m7/p0l0esanwdere emxettrhaoctdesduosned8/f1o8r/a0n0alaynsdiswaenrde ainnsatlryuzmeednbtypaMrSam/eMteSrsonca8n/2b1e/0f0.ouTndheinHAPtLtaCchamnednMtsSD/MaSnd E
Analysis
5.1 Calibration
Afor7-tphoeicntomcaploiubrnadtsioonficnutrevreeswta.sTahnealcyazleidbraatttihoen pboeignitnsniwnegraenpdreepnadorfedthate0a,n2al5y,ti5c0a,l1s0e0q,ue2n5c0e,
500, and 1000 ng/L (ppt) `concentration was plotted
ffoorrcLacCh/pMoSin/tM. SUsanianlgysliisn.caTrhreegirnesstsriuonmewnitthre1s/pxonwseeigvhetrisnugs,
the the.
slope, y-intercept and correlation cocfiicient (r) determined. A calibration curve is acceptableif
and r>
coefficientofdetermination 0.985 (* > 0.970).
(r)
were
Calibration standards are prepared using the same SPE procedure used for samples.
Cinajleicbtriaotniso)nthcrhoeucgkhousttatnhdeaarndaslywseisreseqauneanlcyez.edCompeprliioadniccaellisyob(teaveirnyeditfhtrheee sttoanfdiavred sanaamlpyltee concentrations are within +/-20%ofthe actual value.
For the results reported here, calibration criteria were met.
52 Blanks
eExxttrraaccttiioonnbbllaannkkssswheorueldprneoptahraedveanandyatnaarlgyezteadnwaliyttheesvperreyseenxttraatcotrioanbboavtechtohfe csoanmcpelnetsr.atTihoen
of the low-level calibration standard. compliant.
For these samples, the extraction blanks were
lIenvsetlrcuamleinbtrabtliaonnksstainndtahred,foarnmdofafctlereaknnomwetnhhaingohl-lseovlevlenstamwpelerse.alAsogaainna,lytzheedblaaflnekrsesvheoruylhdingoht-
have any target analytes present at or samples presented here the instrument
above blanks
the are
low-level compliant.
calibration
standard.
For the
53 Surrogates Surrogate spikes are not a componentof the LC/MS/MS analytical methods.
vat nia sscxsmen Repos PR-ApOpendS1
was
000156
5.9 Matrix Spikes sMpaitkreixrescpoivkeersiewseraerepgrievpearneidnfAotrteavcehrmyefnitelCd.sample using all compoundsof interest. Matrix
iFnieAltdtsapcihkmeesnwterC.e sTuhbmeitretseudltwsitfhrotmhetwhaet2er00sapmpptlefsi.eldFiseplidkespfiokresraemcpovleeriQesSaWrePaalslomiCnictlyu-dCe-d FreMsSul-t2s0f0oprpQtSAWiPndailcmatCeitthyat-Ct-hiFsMsSa-m2p0l0eppwtasB sipnidkiecadteata1200000ppppttsrpaitkhienrgtchoannce2n0t0raptpito.n.The
5.15 Duplicates
All field samples in Attachment B.
were
analyzed
in
duplicate.
Results
are
given
along
with
the
sample
results
5.16 Laboratory ControlSamples
aFnodr 2L5C0/nMgS//LMdSurainnaglyesaecsh, eMxitlrlaicqtiwoantesert.waAsllspriekceodvewriitehs aflolrcaollmcpoomupnodusnofdisntweerreestbeattw2e5en
70-130% in each LCS. E.
Results are given along with the raw data in Attachments D and
5.7 Sample Related Comments There are no other sample related comments for this data set.
Data Summary rPelseualstes sareee rAetptoarcthemdeinntpaBrtfsorpeardtertialillieond (lpipstti)n(gongf/Lt)h.e Saenadliymteincatlarnesdulstls.udSguersfaamcpelweatreesrults are reported in parts per billion (ppb) (ng/g) on both an as-received and dry-weight basis.
Data/Sample Retention
Selaemcptlroensicardeatdaisi poasrecdhoifvoednoenmroentrtihevaafbtleer mtheedireapaorntdihsairsdsuceodpyunrleepsosrtosthaerrewsitsoeresdpeicnifdiaedt.a
All folders
maintained by Centre.
Attachments 111 Attachment A: Chain-of-Custody 112 Attachment B: Results. 83 Attachment C: Matrix Spike Recoveries
84 Attachment D: LC/MS/MS Raw Analytical Data (Surface Water Samples) 8.5 Attachment E: LC/MS/MS Raw Analytical Data (Sediment and Sludge Samples)
Dr iilAsssmens Report POS ppetic
as
000187
9 Signatures _Jo--hn M. Flaherty, Manager- Operations Manager -_ Kevin J Loyd, Vice President
Other Lab Members Contributing to Data Karen Smith
3
00
Date
ref ilAssn Repor POS pend
as
000188
Analytical (solids)
Results
E00-2003
Port
St.
Lucie,
FL
Resampling
3M Sample Identification NPWWTP Sludge-C NPWWTP Sludge-C dup SED #3 SH-C SED #3 SH-C dup SED#1 Penparkc SED#1 Penpark-C dup SED#2 MCM-C SED#2 MCM-C dup
PFOS (ug/Kg) (as received)
1.36 1.30 <0.200 <0.200 <0.200 <0.200 <0.200 <0.200
~ PFOSA (ug/Kg) (as received) <0.200 <0.200 <0.200 <0.200 <0.200 <0.200 <0.200 <0.200
POAA (ug/Kg) (as received) <0.200 <0.200 <0.200 <0.200 <0.200 <0.200 <0.200 <0.200
3M Sample Identification NPWWTP Sludge-C NPWWTP Sludge-C dup SED #3 SH-C SED #3 SH-C dup SED#1 Penparkc SED#1 Penpark-C dup SED#2 MCM-C SED#2 MCM-C dup
PFOS (ug/Kg) (dry weight)
629 602 <0.261 <0.261 <0263 <0263 <0.304 <0.304
PFOSA (ug/Kg) (dry weight) <93 <93 <0.261 <0.261 <0.263 <0263 <0304 <0.304
POAA (ug/Kg) (dry weight) <93 <93 <0.261 <0.261 <0263 <0.263 <0304 <0304
J - Compound value.
is
present,
but
below the reporting
limit.
The
result
is an
estimated
raf nis ssxsmen Repos PROS Append 1
mae
ens
APPENDIX IV
PLANNED ENVIRONMENTAL STUDIES ON PERFLUOROOCTANE SULFONATES (PFOS)
[eT ----
wo con150
`PTLheA3NMNECoDmpEaNnVyIiRs pOlNanMnEinNgTtoAcLonSdTucUtDsIevEeSraOl NstuPdiEesRiFnLthUrOeeRsOubOjeCctTaAreNasE: S(1U)LeFnvOiNroAnmTeEntSal sfaatmepalnidngtraanndsproretl,ea(s2e)ecsctiomtaotxiionc)t.y sTtuhdeisees,satunddie(s3)areenvliirstoendmienntTaalblmeonIiVt-1o.ring (environmental `Table IV-1. Planned Environmental Studies on Perfluorooctane Sulfonates (PFOS)
Environmental Fate and Transport
Soil and sediment adsorption/desorption | 3M Environmental
Laboratory
Multi-media modeling of PFOS distribution
D. Mackay, Trent University
Underway Underway
Bioconcentration in bluegill sunfish `Wildlife International, Ltd.
Biodegradability
closed bottle
-
acrobic,
acclimated
| Springbom Laboratories,
Inc.
|Underway
Biodegradability - aerobic soi/sediment | Springborn Laboratorics,
Inc.
spBeicoideegsr)adability - aerobic, pure culture (4| ISnpcr.ingbor Laboratories, | Underway
Biodegradability - anaerobic
Hydrolysis Hydrolysis on soils Photolysis Photolysis with humic matter Photolysis with metals. Photolysis with soils
`Springbom Laboratories,
Inc. 3M Environmental Laboratory 3M Environmental Laboratory 3M Environmental Laboratory 3M Environmental Laboratory 3M Environmental Laboratory 3M Environmental Laboratory
Underway Underway Underway Underway Underway Underway
Solubility - Confirmation Tests
3M Environmental
Laboratory
Underway
Activated sludge sorption isotherm
Brat ial vse Report PFS pend 17
3M Environmental
Laboratory
Underway
wT 0on191
`Table IV-1. Planned Environmental Studies on Perfluorooctane Sulfonates (PFOS)
Photolysis - atmospheric
Ecotoxicity Studies
3LaMboErnavtiorryonmental
Underway
9in6h-iHbritAinonabaenaflos-aquae growth
`Wildlife International, Ltd. |Underway
96-Hr Navicula
inhibition
pelliculosa
growth
`Wildlife International, Ltd. |Underway
96-Hr Skeletonema
inhibition
costatum
growth
`Wildlife International, Ltd. [Underway
7-day Lemna gibba growth inhibition `Wildlife International, Ltd.
Puphtyatkoetox - seedling emergence and plant | Wildlife International, Ltd. |Underway
FETAX (frog embryo teratogenesis)
`LWtidldlUifneivIenrtseirntaytioofnal, Maryland
Underway
Histo-pathological
mallard duck pilot
reexparomodufcttiiosnsues
from
| EPI Laboratory
Underway
bHoisbtwoh-iptaethqoulaoiglicpaillotexreapmroofdtuicstsiuoens from |EPI Laboratory
Pilot
final
study on mallard duck
comprehensive report
reproduction
-|Wildlife
Intemational,
Ltd.
Underway
[Underway
Pilot study on
reproduction -
bobwhite quail
final comprehensive
report
`Wildlife International, Ltd.
[Underway
Emavlallauradtiaonnod fquPaiFlOpSilpotrostteuidnybsipnedicnigmeunssing| Michigan State University |Underway
tViaslsiudeastoifonmaalnldadredtaenrdmiqnuaatiilon of PFOS in |Centre Analytical
`Acute toxicity (0 bluegill sunfish
`Wildlife International, Inc.
Acute toxicity to sheepshead minnow | Wildlife Intemational, Inc
Underway
Acute toxicity to honeybees - oral & contact exposure:
Acute toxicity
\foetida)
to
earthworm
(Eisenia
Mallard duck reproduction (dietary) Ey --r--------
|Wildlife Intemational, Inc.|Underway
`Wildlife International, Inc. | Underway
`Wildlife Intemational, Inc.
wa
C00192
foTable IV-1. Planned Environmental Toman Studies on Perfluorooctane Jon Sulfonates (PFOS)
effluent
sample points
Multi-city sample results
biosphere sampling.
000193
APPENDIX V ROBUST SUMMARIES
Dr itlAssessment Repors Append V
va
000194
ROBUST | TITLE SUMMARY
#
st
RS2 RS3
RS4
RST RS8 RRSS1Y0
Rs11
RS1Z RST3
RSTS
RS16
| Eye Irritation Report on Sample T-1117, 1974
An Acute Inhalation Toxicity StudyofT-2306 CoC in the Rat. 1979 | Fluorad Fluorochemical Surfactant FC-95 Acute Oral Toxicity (LDg,) Study in_Rats. 1978.
Skin Irritation Report on Sample T-1117, 1974.
Random Sample Assessment of Fluorochemical Serum Levels in
Decatur Production Employees, 1998
Analysis for Fluorochemicals in 39 Individual Swedish Blood Blood Samples, 1999 Clinical Chemistries, Hematology and Hormones from Voluntary Medical SurveillanceofMale Fluorochemical Production Workers, 1995 and 1997
Evaluation of the Mutagenic Activity of T-6906 [N-E{FOSE alcohol] iMnoaunseInLVyimtrpohMoammamaCellilsan(WCiatlhl IGnedneepeMnudteanttioRnepTeeastt),Wi1t9h98L5187Y
Mutagenicity Test on T-6292 [N-E(FOSE alcohol] in an In Vivo Mouse
Micronucleus Assay, 1996
Mutagenicity Micronucleus
Test on Assay,
1-5710 1993
[N-E{FOSE
alcohol]
in
an
In
Vivo
Rat
VGietnrootoUxnisccihtyedTuelsetdoDn NT-A57S1y0n.t1he[sNis-EafnFdOCSeEllalPcroohloilf]eriantitohneAIsnsVaiyvoi/nin
Rat Liver Cells, 1993
In Vitro Microbiological
Compounds T-2247 CoC
M[upteargfelunoircoiotcytyAlsssualyfsonoafte3DMECAomsaplta]naynd
T-
2248 CoC, 1978
Salmonella- Escherichia ColyMammalian-Microsome Reverse
Mutation Assay with PFOS, 1999
Salmonella Typhmurium Spot Test on FC-95 [PFOS], 1977
Bacterial Reverse Mutation Test of (x-1, 1996
]
Dra" nlAssn rRepeops dei V
v* 000195
RSIS RSTO RS20
RSZ3 RS24 RS25 RS26
Mutagenicity Evaluation ofT-2014 CoC [PFOS] in the Ames Salmonella/Microsome Plate Test, 1978 Mutagenicity Test on T6295 [PFOS] in an In Vivo Mouse Micronucleus Assay, 1996 Unscheduled DNA Synthesis in Rat Liver Primary Cell Cultures with PFOS, 1999 Chromosomal Aberrations in Human Whole Blood Lymphocytes with PFOS, 1999 Evaluation of the Mutagenic Activity of T-5874 [N-MeFOSE alcohol] in the Ames Salmonella/microsome test (with independent repeat), 1994 Evaluation of the abilityofT-5874 [N-MeFOSE alcohol] to Induce Chromosome Aberrations in Cultured Peripheral Human Lymphocytes, 1994 Evaluation of the Mutagenic Activity of T-5874 [MeFOSE alcohol] in an In Vitro Mammalian Call Gene Mutation Test With LS187Y | Mouse Lymphoma, 1994 Mutagenicity Test on T-5711 [N-MeFOSE alcohol] in an Zn Vivo Rat Micronucleus Assay, 1993 Genotoxicity Test on T-5711.1 [N-MleFOSE alcohol] in the In Vivo/in Vitro Unscheduled DNA Synthesis and Cell Proliferation Assays in Rat Liver Cells, 1993
RS29
RS3T RS3Z RS33 RS34
'RRSS336S RS37 RS38
Analysis of Pooled Blood Samples from 3 European Blood Banks
Analysis of Pooled Blood Samples from 18 U.S. Blood Banks `Analysis of PFOS from Pooled SerumofTwo Commercial Laboratories, 1998 APilot Study to Identify Fluorochemicals in Children With Limited Sera for Analysis, 1999 2Po6t-aWseseikumCaSpalstul(ePFTOoxSi;ciTt6y2S9t5u)diyn wCiytnhoPmeorlfgluusorMooocntkaenyesS.uUlfnoanuidciAtceiddDraft Final Report Two Year Oral (Diet) Toxicity Carcinogenicity Study of Fluorochemical FM-3924 [N-EtFOSE alcohol] in Rats 4-Week Capsule Toxicity Study with Perfluoroctane Sulfonic Acid Potassium Salt (PFOS; T-6295) in Cynomolgus Monkeys. Unaudited Draft. 1998. Second ninety-day rhesus monkey toxicity study [PFOS], 1978 Ninety day study in rats, [PFOS], 1978 13-Week Dietary Toxicity Study with N-Methyl
raf niasxe Report Appenis
va
000196
RS39
104-Week Dietary Chronic Toxicity and Carcinogenicity Study with
Perfluorooctane Sulfonic Acid Potassium Salt (PFOS: T-6295) in
[RS$0_TORraatsl.DeSvuemlmoapmreyntReaploTorxticWieteykSt5u3dyof N-EFOSEfnRabbits |
RS41
Oral Teratology Study of FM3422 in Rats - Experiment No.
RSE:
0680TR0010 [N-EtFOSE]
RS43
Combined Oral (Gavage) Fertility, Developmental and
Perinatal/Postnatal Reproduction Toxicity Study of N-EtFOSE in
Rats 3M 418-009; Argus Research Laboratories Study Number:
6295.9, 1999
RS44
Oral (Stomach Tube) Developmental Toxicity Study of PFOS in Rabbits - 3M T-6295.10, Argus Research Laboratories Study
Number: 418-012, 1999
RS45
Oral Teratology Study of FC-95 in Rats - Experiment No. 0680TR0008
RS46
RS47
RSE
Rat Teratology Study T-3351 Final Report -- Project No. 154-160
`Combined Oral (Gavage) Fertility, Developmental and
| Perinatal/Postnatal Reproduction Toxicity Study of PFOS in Rats Argus Research Laboratories Study Number: 6295.9, 1999. Protocol
418-008
RS49
Ninety day subacute rat toxicity study on FM-3422 [N-EtFOSE
alcohol]
RS51
Ninety Day Subacute Rhesus Monkey Toxicity Study on FM-3422 IN-
EtFOSE alcohol] 104-Week Dietary Carcinogenicity Study with Narrow Range
(98.1%) N-Ethyl-Perfluorooctanesulfonamido Ethanol in Rats. SUMMARY REORT - WEEK 53
Oral (Gavage) Pharmacokinetic Recovery Study of PFOS in Rats
(1999)
RS53
Determination of Serum Half-Livesof Perfluorooctanesulfonate and
Other Fluorochemicals
| RS54
28-Day Percutaneous Absorption Study with FC-95 in Albino
Rabbits (1981)
rttr rt
w
000197
[RRS5S6S RS57 RSS8 RS59
RS60
O`rAabsloTreprtaiotnolaongdySbtioutdryaonsffTo-rm2a9t9i9oCnooCfiNn-REatbFbOiStEs and tissue
|
distribution and elimination of carbon-14 after administration of N-
EtFOSE-"C in feed (1983)
Extent and Route of Excretion and Tissue Distribution of Total
(1979) Cholestyramine-Enhanced Fecal Elimination of Carbon-14 in Rats after Administration of Ammonium [14C]Perfluorooctanoate or Potassium [14C]Perfluorooctanesulfonate (1984) Analytical Laboratory Report on the Determination of the Presence and Concentration of Potassium Perfluorooctanesulfonate (CAS Number: 2795-39-3) in the Serum and Liver of Sprague-Dawley Rats Exposed to PFOS via Gavage (1999)
ref nia sss Report Appesic
vs
000198
ROBUST SUMMARY - RS1
Title: Eye Imitation Report on Sample T-1117. 1974
TEST SUBSTANCE
Identity: Potassium perfluorooctanesulfonate.
Remarks: 3M Sample T-1117, FC-95
METHOD
Note pHof test material: Not specified
Method/Guideline followed: Not specified
Test Type: in vivo
Species/strain/cell type or line: RabbivAlbino
Sex (males/females/both): Not specified
Number of animals/sex/dose: 6/single dose
`Total dose: Itis gram for solids,
assumed to be and FC-95 is a
0.1 grampereye solid as sold)
(the
method
specifies
0.1
mi
for
liquids
and
0.1
Lmeetnhgotdh,oifttiismaesstuemstedmattheatritahle misatienrciaolntwaacst winitcohnatancitmaflocreolnle: hoBuars,edalotnhotuhgehdtehsicsriisptniootnospfetcihfeied.
Observation period: Ihr, 24 hr, 48 hr, 72 hr Sacccoorridnigngmetoththoedsucsaleedo:fsNcootrsipnegciffoireddaomrargeefetroentcheedco-m"eTah,eirrse,acatnidontthoe tbhuelbtaesrtamnadteprailaplebwraasl read conjunctiva..." gRreammarokfst:heRtaesbtbistusbswtearneceplwaacsedinisnticlolleldarins osnoetheeyey,ctohueldotnhoetrreuybetwheaisr eleyfetsu.ntErietahteerd0a.s1 amclonotrro0l..1 SthiencceonFcCe-nt9r5atiisoanosfoltihdemastoelruitailo,nitisisnoatssspuemceifdietdh.at T0.h1egmreatmhowdascailnlsstiflolerd.rem1o0v.i1ngmlanwyarsesinisdtuielloedf, athsestuemsetdmattheartitahleactocnatcachtopbesreirovdatwiaosn poenreiohdo.urS;ianlctehtohueghficrsotnotabcsterpveartiioodnipsenroitodotihseartwoinsee hspoeucri,fiietdi.s cIotmsear,epiorrist,edantdhatthtehbeurlebaacrtiaonndtpoatlhpeebtreastl mcaotnejruinacltiwvaaseraetad1, a2g4a,i4n8s,t aansdca7l2e ohfoudrasmaafgteerttoretahtement. T9.h3e3sacta2le4chroituerrsiaaafreerntorteaptrmeesnetnttehdenordercefreeraesnecdedo.veIrt tahpepereasrtsoftthahtescsotruedsyrteoazcehreod aatmtahex7i2muhomurof observation. The authors conclude only T-1117 is irritating to the eyes.
--------
ve
000199
RESULTS
Corrosive: no
Irritation score: Only total scores provided. One hr: 8.00; 24 hr: 9.33; 48 hr: 3.33; 72 hr: 0.0. `Tool used to assess score: Not specified Description of lesions: none
Remarks: over time.
Inadequate description and discussion in report.
Scores appear reduced
in all
rabbits
ICnOaNdeCqLuaUtSeIiOnfNoSrma-tOinolnyiscpornecsleunstieodn ipnrorvepiodretdtionesvtaulduyaties qtuhaatlitteysot fsusbtsutdayncaendisviarlriidtiattiynogfto eyes. conclusion.
REFERENCE
J. A. Biesemeier and Project No. 4102871,
D.L. Harris. 1974. Eye WARF Institute Inc.
and
Skin
Iritation
Report
on
Sample
T-1117.
raf nasre Report Appentc
va
00ITH0
ROBUST SUMMARY - RS2
Title: An Acute Inhalation Toxicity Studyof T-2306 CoC in the Rat. 1979 TEST SUBSTANCE
Identity: Potassium Perfluorooctylsulfonate. CAS No.: 2795-39-3 Remarks: Dust, PFOS (T-2306 CoC)
METHOD
Method/guideline followed: Similar to OECD 403
GLP: N, 10 QA/QC indicated
Year study performed: 1979
Species/Strain: RavSprague-Dawley
Sex (Males/females/both): Both
No. of animals/sex/dose: S/sex/group
Route ofAdministration: Inhalation
Remarks: Concentrations of 1.89, administered to eight test groups. A
2.86, 4.88, 6.49, 7.05, 13.9, 24.09, Wright dust-feed mechanism with
45.97 mg/l dry air at a
PFOS were flow rate of
12
T10he16telsittegrrsopuepr rmaitnsuwteeiwgahesdu2s0ed1-t2o9a9dmgiantisstteurdythieniPtiFaOtiSon.duTsth.e cRoanttsrowlergeroeuxpporastesdwefoirgh1 ehdou2r0.3-
m2i6n3utgea.t sAtlludoythineirtipartoiotno.colTshewecroenttrhoelsraatmsewaesretheextpesotsgerotuopdrrayts.airTahtae rfaltoswwerartee oobfs1e2rvleitderfsorper
farbnoomrtmhaelesxipgonssuprreiocrhatmobeexrp,oshuoruer,lyatfo1r5-fmoiunruhtoeurisntaefrtvearlsexdpuorsiunrget,haendI-dhaoiulryetxhpeorseuarfiee,raftorre1m4ovdaayls.
Individual 7, and Day
b14o.dytwiesigrhetpsorwteerdethraetcoalrldaendiomnalDsadyyi0n(gprsipoornttoanecxopuossluryew)e,rDeanyec1r,oDpasyie2d,aDsasyoo4n,
Day as
possible analyses
after were
death. Blood not provided.
samples
were
collected
on
Day
14
from
all
surviving
animals,
but
RESULTS LCS0=5.2 (4.4 ~ 6.4) mg/L; referenced methodofLitchfield and Wilcoxon Numberof deaths at each dose level (by sex): 70..005mgm/gl/:l:0/81/01;0;12.849.0m9g/mlg:/l0:/1100;/21.00(6amutgh:ors1d/i1d0;no4t.8p8romvgi/ld:e s2/u1m0;ma6r.4y9bmyg/sle:x)8/10;
tReermmainraktse:d oTnheDahyig2h.esAttdotshaetgprooiuntp,, o4n5l.y97$ magn/ilm,awlsassunrovtiuvesdedanindtbhleoLodCs,acmapllceuslawteironestaankden at
Dra nialsss Report Appeic
va
ee
000201
tperrombilneatmidonu.rinTgheexp1o3s.u9rmeg./lTghreosuepawniamsalalsswoetreermailnsaotneodteuasrleyd (iDn atyhe1L) Cb,e,caduetseermoifnaatmieocnh.anical
In the 24.09 mg/l exposure group, 80% mortality. At4.88, 2.86, and
all animals died 1.89 mg/l there
by Day 6. was 20%,
At 7.05 10%, and
and 0%
6.49 mg/l morality,
there
was
mraetsepercitailvealryo.unTdhteherantsosien oalrlotthheesrengarsoaulpdsisschhoawrgeed,syieglnlsoowfmtaotxeirciiatly airncoluunddintgheemaanocgieantiitoanl, rreegdion,
dobrsyerravlaetsioornsotwheerrebrreepaotrhtiendgtdoisbteurlbeasnscferse,qaunendtgiennetrhaellpoowoerr ceoxnpdoistuiroen.grAobupnso.rmal in-lfe
`Twhaes amlossotocbsoemrmveodnianbcnoonrtmraollirtaytswaansddtihsecroelfoorraetimoanoyfntohtebleivterreaatnmdenlutngr.elaDtieds,coTlhoerraetfioornoe,ftthheemlousngt. sAimgnoinfigcaanntitmraelastmtehnatt-direedlaptreedmaabtnuorremlayl,idteycwraeassveadrbyoidngy dweegirgehe,sofdidsicsocloolroatriaotnioofnotfhtehleunlgi,vear.nd discoloration and distention of the small intestine were also observed. CONCLUSIONS LC50=52 (4.46.4) mg. Only conclusion provided; seems reasonable with available data REFERENCE
R2u3s0c6hC,oGCM.in,tWh.eER.at.RinPcrhoajretctaNnod.C.7A8.-7B1o8z5a,kB.io19/7d9y.naAmnicAscuIntce. Inhalation Toxicity Study ofT-
OTHER - Summary modified 8/11/00
----------
vo
000202
ROBUST SUMMARY - RS3
Title: 1978.
Fluorad Fluorochemical Surfactant FC-95 Acute Oral Toxicity (LD) Study in
Rats.
TEST SUBSTANCE
Identity: Potassium perfluorooctylsulfonate, CAS No.: 2795-39-3
Remarks: Fluorad Fluorochemical Surfactant, FC-95, White powder
METHOD Method/guideline followed: Similar to OECD 401
GLP (Y/N): N, no QA/QC indicated
Year study performed: 1978
Species/Strain: Rat/Charles River CD
Sex (Males/females/both): both
Number of animals/sex/dose: S/sex/dose
Vehicle: 20% acetone/80% corn oil
Route of Administration: gavage
aRdemmianrisktse:redLeavsevlsoloufm1e0s0,of21150,mi46/4k,g abnoddy10w0ei0gmhtg./kTghePFraOtSs wweeirgehteedste1d7.2-A2l1l2dgosaet tlheeveblesgwienrneing
oaftsthweesrteuodybsiemrmveeddiafotrelaybnporrimaotlro sdiognssindgurainndgwtehieghfotusrwheoruersreacftoerrdeedxpaotsDuraey, 7anadnddaDialyyth1e4,reTafhieer
for 14 days. It is reported as all rats that survived to
tthheateanldloafnitmhaels14d-ydianygsstupdoyn.tancously
were
grossly
necropsied,
as
well
RESULTS - LDS0: 251 (199-318) mg/kg, 3 references for statistical tables are given.
Numberof deaths at each dose level (by sex): 100 mg/kg: 0/5 males, 0/5 females;
215 mg/kg: 2/5 males, 1/S females; 1000 mg/kg: 5/5 males, 5/5 females
464
mg/kg:
5/5
males,
5/5
females;
Remarks: Al rats in raf nia ssssmens Report
the 464 and Append
1000
mg/kg
dose
groups
died
before
the
end
of
the
study. vio
000203
fTrherqeueenatnliymoablsseirnvethdei2n1c5lumdegd/:khgygporaocutpivdiiteyd, pdreecmraetausreedlyl.imbIttaopnep,eaarnsdsaitganxsioaf. tAotxinceictyrompossyt iorbrsietratviaotnoiofnsthiencglluadneddu:layremlulcowo-ssat,aiannedd luurnoggecnointgaelstrieogni.on,Nsotodmiaffcehrednicsetsenbteiotnweaenndsseixgenss owfere noted.
LDS0 male rats: 233 (160-339) mg/kg LDSO female rats: 271 (200-369) mg/kg
CONCLUSIONS - None specified beyond LDSO
REFERENCE
FDleuaonr,ocWh.Pe.m,icDa.lC.SuJrefsascutpa,ntG.FCT-h9o5mpAscounte,
G. Romig, and D. Powell. 1978. Fluorad Oral Toxicity (LD) Study in Rats. Study
No.
137-083,
RIanttesrnwaittihonTa-l2R2e9s7eaCrocCh. aPnrdojDeecvteNloo.pm7e8n-t14C3o3rApo,rBatiioosne.arc(hI,ncIlnucd.e)s Acute Oral Toxicity Study in
OTHER - Summary modified 8/11/00
rafniAsRsepore t Appn end ee
var
00N204
ROBUST SUMMARY - RS4
Title: Skin Irritation Report on Sample T-1117.
Identity: Potassium perfluorooctanesulfonate.
Remarks: 3M Sample T-1117; FC-95
METHOD
Note pH of test material: Not specified
Method/Guideline followed: Not specified
Test Type: in vivo
Species/strain/cell type: Rabbits/albino
Sex (males/females/both): Not specified
Numberofanimals/sex/dose: 6 total
Total dose: 0.5 grams per cachoftwo test sites per rabbit (intact-wet and abraded-wet) Vehicle: None
Length of test material is in contact with animal/cell: 72 hr fGorramdaitinognsacanlde:edSecmaalefsoorfma1titoon4,aricncurseeadsianngdisncsoerveesriftoyr feoarcehryetndhpeomianatnadreessuchmamre(dcosmubcihnethda)t the. score equals the sum of erythema and edema scores. Reference source not provided. oRfeomnaerkgsr:amS(i0x.5almbii)nooftraebsbtitmsahteardiatlhewirashapirlaccleidppoendafbrroamdetdheoirrbianctkacst apnredpaflraendkst,esatnsditfeisve(itnetnactth-s wweetrearndemaobvreaddeda-nwdett)h,e dtehgerneceoovfeerreydtwhietmhagaaunzdeepdaetmcahewsaasndretcaopredde.d Aafctceorrd2i4nhgotuorsa stthaencdoavredriiznegds scale. An additional observation and scoring was performed at 72 hours RESULTS
rReesdudletnsi:ngIonrasllweclalsiensgitdestercteepdo.rted the primary skin irritation scores were 0; which indicates no
Primary irritation score: zero
Remarks: No indicationofreliability. No QA/QC. No effects reported.
Dra iedAsses Ror Append
v2
00N205
CONCLUSIONS: No ofstudy and validityof
irritation. Inadequate conclusion.
information
is
presented
in
report
to
evaluate
quality
REFERENCE:
JA. Biesemeicr and DL. Harris. 1975. Project No. 4102871, WARF Institute,
Eye Inc.
and
Skin
Irritation
Report
on
Sample
T-1117.
Dfiil AsssRespomrt eAppnentd
vas
ceonee
ROBUST SUMMARY - RSS
Title: Retrospective Cohort Mortality Studyofthe 3M Decatur Plant, 1995 TEST SUBSTANCE
Identity: PFOS
Remarks:
METHOD
Study design: Retrospective cohort mortality study.
AMlaanbuafmaac.turing/Processing/Use: 3M chemical and film manufacturing facility in Decatur,
DHeycpaottuhrespilasnttewsatesd:sigTnoifdiecatnetrlmyidnieffwehreetnthefrrothmetmhoatrtwahliitcyhewxopuelridenbceeoexfpeecmtpedl.oyees at the 3M
Study period: The cohort Decatur plant from March
consistedofemployees who 1961 toDecember31, 1991
had
worked
at
least
one
year
at
the
Setting: Occupational. were physically distinct
Plants entities
located in Decatur, Alabama. The (approximately 300 yards apar).
chemical
plant
and
film
plant
Total population: 1957 employees were eligible for the cohort
Subject selection criteria: day after March 1, 1961.
Employed
at
least
oneyear
at
the
3M
Decatur plant
and
at
least
|
`Total #of 1050 men
esvuebrjeecmtpslionyestduidny:the1c6h3e9mmiaclaelspl(a7n0t
deaths),
318
females
(4
deaths)
1116 men ever employed in the film plant
iCnoAmlpaabraimsaonwhpeorpeulmaotrieont:haUn.So. npeop-ulhaoatfiltohnf,e Acloaunbtaymawapsopwuiltahtiinon1,0a0nmdilthees poofpDuelcaattiuorn, ienxccoluundtiinegs counties in which there was a city with greater than 100,000 persons. wPaerrteicliosptattoiofnolrlatoew:-upVi(taalll smtaalteu)s.was determinedfor99.7%ofthe cohort. Only 6 employees
----------
vas
N07
Subject description:
`Total numberof person-years Numberof deaths Average age started work Average yearof entry Average age at death Average yearofdeath Still employed at plant
Males 33,108 70 25 1971 a7 1984 81011639
Females 4,807
4 26 1977 2 1980 141318
Data from
sctoaltleecvittiaolnstmaettishtoidcss:offMicoerst,alEiqtuyifdaaxtaDdeeartihveSdeafrrcohm,:
National and TRW
Death FAC+
Index, death certificates Summary. Work
hfoirstaotrileesas(teomnpeloyyeaere. records) were used to verify that the employee worked at the Decatur plant
Exposure period: Potential exposure period was March 1, 1961 to December 31, 1991
Description/delineation of exposure groups/categories: 1639 males, 70 deaths; 318 females, 4 deaths. eMmepalsouyreeddionrtheestcihmeamitceadledxeppoasrutrmee:nt(1s))e;v3e)r eevmeprleomypeldoiynetdheincthheemifcialml ddeeppaarrttmmeenntt((ss));; 42)) oonnllyy employed in the film department(s).
Statistical methods: Program (OCMAP).
SMR calculated using the Occupational 95% confidence intervals provided.
Cohort
Mortality
Analysis
Odetahtehrs smpeetchiofidcolfoorgitchealcaiunsfeoorfmdaetaitohn,: rSaceM,Rsexc,alacguel,ataenddutsiimneg(obbasseerdveodn tIoCDe-x8p)e.cteTdhenuemxbpeecrtoedf
numberofdeaths was calculated the comparison population to the
by applying cause-, person-years at risk.
race-, sex-, age-, and time-specific rates Cohort members did not contribute
for
upeprwsoenr-eyecaornstruinbtuitletdhuenytihladdemateht, tlhoessmtionfiomlulomw-luepn,gtohrofthweoernkdocfrittehreiosnt.udyP.ersEomnp-lyoeyaeressofwefroellow
washsoummeaddteoatbhe cwehrittifeicbaetceacuosuelndonoitnfboermoabttiaoinnewdaosnalvyawilearbeleinocnlurdaceed.inDetcheea"saleldcsatuusdeysomfedmebaetrhs" for
and "unknown causeofdeath" categories.
tShMeRUsScDoemaptuhtReadteussipnrgotghreamO.ccuRpeastulitosnawlerCeohvoirrttuMalolrytaildienttyicAanla.lyMsoirstaPlriotgyrraamteasnfdorcwohmiptaersewdertoe used to calculate the expected numbers for all men and women.
rah iilAssn Ror ppesic V ee
vas
ocNzos
RESULTS
wDeerscersiibmeilraersutlo,tsb:utSlMoRwesr btahsane,d tohnostehebaAsleadboanmatahendUSAlcaobmapamraicsoounntpioepsulcaotmipona.riUssoinnpgoptuhleaUtiSonass the comparison population, SMR for men for all causesofdeath, heart disease, and respiratory.
disease (nonmalignant) were significantly less than 100 (62.9, 59.1, and 0, respectively). The SMR for all cancers was 68.4, although not significant. Most ofthe specific cancer SMRs were less than 100 except for cancofethre bladder and other urinary organs and cancer ofother
dleyamtphhsataincd awnedrehenmoattostpaotiiesttiiccaltliysssuieg.nifFiocarntt.hese 2 causes, the SMRs were based on only 1 or2
extemal causes, `There were only 4 deathsforwomen. When compared to the US population, no causeofdeath
had an SMR significantly different from 100. Threeofthe 4 deaths were from non-work-related
For men ever employed in the chemical department(s), the SMR for all causes wassignificantly
less than 100 (48.8; 95% C1 24.4, 87.4). SMRs for all cancer were 76.9 (95%CI 40.9, 131.5).
Although not statistically significant, SMRs > 100 were reported for men ever employed in the
chemical department(s) (n = 1,050) for cancer ofthe `bronchus, trachea and lung [SMR = 120.7;
95% CI 48.5-248.7), cancerofthe bladder and other urinary organs [SMR = 415.5, 95% CI 10.4
- 2,315.3],
aleukemia
cancer
[SMR
ofthe brain and
= 120.0, 95% CI
o3t.h0e-r66C8.H8S],[aSnMd Rca=n1c1er7.o2fo,th9e%r
CI 2.9 - 653.0], leukemia and
lymphatic and hematopoietic
tissue [SMR = 137.2, 95% CI 3.4-764. 5]. Allof these SMRs > 100, except for cancerofthe
`bronchus
findings
, trachea and
were reported
lung, were basedon just
when the analyses were
one
rest
observed death. C
ricted to men who
omparablenonsignificant
only worked in the
chemical plant (n = 485). All of the above SMRs were based on the US comparison population.
`There were 37 deaths among men ever `employed in the film department(s). Astatistically significant deficit was observed for all causesof death combined (58.6, 95% CI 41.3, 80.8). Eleven deaths were observed for men only employed in the film department(s). There were no statistically significant increases in SMRs for anyof the causesof death.
sSutbujdeyctsstwreernegtohlsdearntdhawnea4k5neyesasress:of Fageewadtetahtehsen7d4o/f19s5t1u,dyo,nlfyeawpwproomxeinmactoeullyd4b5e%ostfudtiheeds,tluednygth
o(fdoeemspnlootyamdednrteswsalsatneontcym,etausumroevde,r,PeFtcO.)S.
serumlevels
Onlyhalf of
were not examined in relation to mortality
the employees are still employed at the
plant,
This study has a very high rate offollow up for employees (97.3%), and will be updated in 2000.
ERnevsieraorncmhenstpaolnsaonrds:OccUunpivaetrisointayloHfeaMlitnhn.esota, Schoolof Public Health, Division of
Ort et sm eia.tenti
vaog en209
Consistency of results: There are no other mortality worker studies on PFOS. CONCLUSIONS
cAommopnargismaolnepso,pSulMaRtisonweurseedbetolocawlctuhleantuellthveaelxupeefcotreadllvamlaujeos.r cGaiuvseesnotfhdateatthehwroergakredrlepsospouflatthieon swmaasll50adydoiutniogn,alit aismodiufnfitcuolftitnofdorrmaawtimoann;yhocwoenvcelurs,ioonnsl.yhaAlnfoufptdahteeoefmptlhoeyseteusdayrweilsltiplreomvipdleoyaed at the plant, and PFOS-related products will soon be removed from the manufacturing site. REFERENCE
Mandel JS and Johnson RA. March 13, 1995. Decatur, Alabama. University of Minnesota,
Mortality studyofemployees Schoolof Public Health.
at
3M
plant
in
raf naAssos Report Appentic
var
oenzio
ROBUST SUMMARY - RS6
Title: Random Sample Employees, 1998
Assessment
of
Fluorochemical
Serum
Levels
in
Decatur
Production
TEST SUBSTANCE
Identity: PFOS
Remarks: here.
Other fluorochemicals were assayed in this study.
However, only PFOS is reported
METHOD
Study design: Random, cross-sectional occupational study.
Manufacturing/Processing/Use: employees.
Comparisonofchemical
plant
employees
to
film
plant
dHeytpeortmhienseisthetedsitsetdr:ibTutoiornaonfdoemmlpylosyaemeplseereummplfolyueoersocfhreommictahlelDeeveclastuarcccohredmiincgaltopdleamntogtroaphics, vcuorlruennttarayndnaltounrgeeostf thheeldmjeodbisc,alyesaurrsvewiolrlkaendc,e parnodgbruaimlddiindgnlootcaptrioonvsi.deTfhiosarwcaosmpdloenteesince the understandingofthe distribution of fluorochemical serum levels in the Decatur workforce.
Study period: October~ November 1998
Setting: Occupational--Decatur, Alabama.
p`aTrottiaclippoatpeul(atottiaoln#:of23w2orekmeprlsoayteeplsarntanndotomplryovcihdoesde)n + 76 "volunteers who requested that they
Subject selection Alabama.
criteria:
Current employment at thefilmor chemical plant in
Decatur,
`Total# of employees
subjects in study: who volunteered to
186 employees participate.
outof
the
random
sample
of
232,
plus
76
Comparison population: N/A
Participation rate: 80%ofthe random sample participated
rat nial ssn Report Append
vas
0031
Average age
Chemicalplant employees 42 years old
Avg. length of employment Gender
16 years mostly male
Film plant employees 46 years old 19 years mostly male
Data collection methods: Work history questionnaire and blood sera samples pDreotcaeidlusroen, danadtaPcFoOllSecwtiaosn:meSaesruaresadmupsliensgwheirghe-epxrtersascutreedluisqiuindgcahnroimona-tpoagirraipnhgye/xetlreaccttrioonspray tandem mass spectrometry evaluated versus an extracted curve, Exposure period: N/A
Dreecsocrrdiepdticounr/rdeenltiannedatlioonngeosfte-hxeplodsure groups/categories: On questionnaire, employees jobs, age, BMI, hand-to-mouth activity.
Measured or estimated exposure: PFOS serum level is surrogate for exposure Exposure levels: N/A
sStiantgilsetaicnadl mmuelttihvoadrsi:ablUesreedgrSeAssSioanndusJinMgPlitnoecaralacnudlatneonsltiundeeanrta'nat-ltyesset,s.chGiesoqmueatrer,icANmeOaVnAs, tcahlecLulLaOteQd (alnodg0nowramsalusdeids.tributions). For serum values less than the LLOQ, a midpoint between
`Oatnhdenronmreetshpoodnodleorgsiicnalrainndfoomrmsaatmipolne: bDyadtaemaongarlayspehsicwecrhaeraccotnedriuscttiecds;to2:) c1)ocmopmapraermeeraenspsoenrduemrs
fluorochemical within the film
levels within the chemical plant by similar factors.
plant;
3)
compare
mean
serum
fluorochemical
levels
RESULTS
Describe results: Chemical plant employees (n ppm (95% CI, 0.091 -- 10.600); geometric mean
= 126): arithmetic mean PFOS level PFOS level was 0.941 ppm (95% CI,
was 1.505 0.785
f1.r1o2m8)c.acMhaoltehe(r0..8O9n7 pavpemr)agaen,dsfeermuamlefl(u0o.r4o5c9hepmpimc)algleeovmeeltsrwiecrmeeaannsorwdeerreofsmiganginfiictaundtleyhdiigfhfeerrent
amemaonngPcFhOeSmilceavlelpl=an0t.1e7m2plpopymee(s9t5h%anCIo,th0e.r01w5or~ke0r.s9.46F)i;lgmepolmaenttriecmpmleoayneePsF(OnS=l6e0v)e:l =ar0i.t1hm3e6tic
ppm (95% CI, 0.114 -0.162).
pRleasnutltjsobwecrateecgoormipeasrwaebrlee stotrtohnegleympalsosyoceieast'edsewlift-rhepprorotdeudctlioonngebsuti-lhdeilndgjoabsss.igCnumrernetnst.cAhreimtihcmaeltic
[r--------
vas
oenn12
cmaetaegnorsieersu(mraPnFgOe)Swleervee:lsce(lrlaonpgeeriantoprasre2n.t9h0e3sips)pmfo(r0.t3h2e5e-i6g.h8t40c)h;emwiacsatlepolpaenrtactuorrrsen2t.j6o4b9 ppm (4.00.6205)4;-7s.u8p8e0r);vicshoermsi/cmaalnaopgeermaetnotrs1.18.77981(0p.p0.m09(10-.1407.16-070.)2;60m)i;llmaopienrtaetnoarnsc0e.w7o1r8k(e0r.s2310.-627.204(00).;291engincer/laboratory workers 0.634 (0.095-1.740); and sccretarics 0.497 (0.220-1.140). PFOS was modestly positively associated ( = 0.11) with years worked in the chemical plant. Shatvuedyocscturrernegdthisn parnedviwoeuaskDneecsasteusr:stTuhdiisesstinudwyhaidcdhrepasrsteidcitphaetipoonsswiablsevvoolluuntnatreye.r biTahsisthsattucdoyuladlso measured other perfluorinated compounds in blood serum.
`This study categories.
did
not
provide
exposure
information,
but
did
provide
additional
information
on
job
Research sponsors: 3M Environmental Lab
Consistency the voluntary
of results: The distributionofserum medical surveillance programs.
levels
are
consistent
with
those
reported
in
CONCLUSIONS Balalsoewdedonfaoarrabnedttoemr suanmdperlseotafnedmipnlgooyfetehse,dtishterdiabuttaioonbotafinseedvefnrofmlutohrioscbhieomliocgailcsalinastsheescshmeemnitcal oabnsdefrivlemdpwlearnte ecmopmlpoayreaeblpeoptuoltahtoisoensre(poonrltyedPFinOtSherevpoolrutnetdarhyerme)e.dicDailstrsiubruvteiiolnloanfcseeprruogmrasmasm.ples REFERENCE O1l1s,e1n99G9,.LFolguaonroPcWh,emSiicamlpseoxnpoCsAur,eBausrrsiesssJmMe,ntBoufrlDeewcaJtMu,r cShcehmuimcpaelrtanJdC,fiMlamnpdlealntJeH.mplAouygeuesst. 3M Medical Department, St. Paul, MN. FYI-0500-01378.
OTHER
er
Wong
ROBUST SUMMARY - RS7
Title: Analysis for Fluorochemicals in 39 Individual Swedish Blood Blood Samples, 1999 TEST SUBSTANCE
Identity: PFOS
Remarks:
METHOD
Study design: Cross-sectionaldataon Swedish disease laboratory.
PFOS
detected
in
individual
serum
samples
from
a
Manufacturing/Processing/Use: N/A
Hypothesis population.
tested:
To
determine
the
presence
of
PFOS
in
the
serum
of the
general
Study period: 1998
Setting: N/A
`Total population: Provided 39 information was also provided.
individual
Swedish
samples.
Age and gender demographic
Subject selection criteria: At discretion of the Swedish disease laboratory. `Total #of subjects in study: 39
Comparison population: N/A
Participation rate: N/A
8Su6byjeeacrts doefsacgrei.ptOionnl:y 3Thsearmeplweesrewe1r6emuanldeesratnhde 2a3gefoemfal1e7s.(agAegse5,r5anagnedd 1f2r).omM5etahnrough age was 42.
Health effects studied: PFOS levels in blood
Data collection methods: Blood scra samples
Details drawn,
on data collection: stored, etc
No
information
was
provided
as
to
how
the
blood
was
Dra nilsesRepsort Append
vai
oonzia
Exposure period: Unknown--PFOS serum levels used as surrogate for exposure. Description/delineation of exposure groups/categories: N/A Measured or estimated exposure: N/A Exposure levels: N/A Statistical methods: Means calculated. Other methodological information: RESULTS DLeoswcerribLeimrietsoulftsQ:uaAnttiottaatlioofn2(8L(L7O2Q%))owfhitchhe w3a9sin3d1i.v4idpupabl.s ThahdesmceraunmsPcFrOuSm PleFvOelSs lbeevleolwfotrhethe T1h1eirnediwveirdeuanlos wsihgonsifeicsaenrtudmemleovgerlaspwheircedaibffoevreentcheesLbLetOwQeewnaisn4di8v.i0dupaplbs(wrhaonghea3d1.L6L-8O5Q.4vpeprbs)u.s tPheorsceenwthmoasleesweerruem3P9FaOnSd v4a5lupeerscwenetr,er>esLpeLctOiQve.ly.AveArmaogengagtehsosweeriend4i0viadnuadls43w,hroeshpeacdtisveerluy.m PFOS values greater than the LLOQ, there was no association with age and/or gender. SintituidalyPsFtrOeSngltehvselainndtwheeagkenneersaslesp:opulTahteisoen-d-antoaoatrheercrdoesssc-rsiepcttiivoenailnfdoartmaautsieodn taoboduettetrhmeisnuebjaencts twhaasn cLoLllOeQc.ted.BlLoiomditdeodnonrusmcbaenrnooftsbaemcpolnessidaenrdedferweeprreyseetnttahtaitvheoafdtsheerugmenPerFaOlSpolpeuvlealtsigorne.ater Research sponsors: 3M Medical Department Consistency of results: N/A CONCLUSIONS NA
rat niassessmens Report Append
var
00ONT1S
ROBUST SUMMARY - RS8
MTiatllee:FlCulionrioccahleCmhiecmailstPrrioedsu,ctHieomnaWtoorlkoegrys,an1d9H95oramnodn1e9s97from Voluntary Medical Surveillance of TEST SUBSTANCE
Remarks:
METHOD
Study design: Cross-sectional
Manufacturing/Processing/Use: Facilities in Decatur, manufacture perfluorooctanesulfony! fluoride products.
Alabama and Antwerp, These fluorochemicals
Belgium which can metabolize
in the body to PFOS.
aHnydpohtohremsoinsaltesptaerda:metTeorsprionviredleatainonagtgorseegratuem aPnFalOySsisloevfeltsheashemmeaatsoulroegdy,inctlihneimcaeldiccheamlistries, surveillance examinationsofAntwerp and Decatur employes in 1995 and 1997. Study period: Fall 1994 to Spring 1995, and 1997
Setting: Occupational. Plants located in Antwerp, Belgium and Decatur, Alabama eTomtpalloypeoepsulwaetrieone:ligAipblperofxorimtahteesltuydy3.00TDheecattotuarl epmlapnltoypoepeuslaatnidon2s00weArnetwnoetrpprporvioddeudc.tion S1u9b9j7e--cotnsleylemctailoenscwreitreeriaan:alVyozleudnbteacrayupsaerotfiscimpaaltilonniunmbmeedriocfalfesmuravleeilwloarnkceersp.rogram 1995 and TTohtearle #waosf aslusbojeactssubisnetsotfudey:mplIony1e9e9s5,fo9r0wDheocamtuhroramnodn8a8l Apnartawmeertperesmwpleoryeesetsudpiaerdt:ici5p0a/t8e8d. Antwerp and 38/90 Decatur employees.
In 1997, 84 Decatur and 65 Antwerp employees volunteered in the medical surveillance program. Comparison population: N/A
pPaarrttiicciippaatteidoinnrtahtees:e vIonlbuonttharyyeamresd,icleasls stuhravnei5l0la%ncoefetxhaemeilniagtiibolensp.roOdnucltyi6o1n eemmppllooyyeeeess were `common to both time periodsofthe study.
ISnudbejxectthadnestchreipAtnitowne:rDpeecamtpulroeymepsloiynebeosthwe1r9e95siagnndifi1c9a9n7t.lyAonldtewreapnedmhpaldoyaeheisghaelsroBsomdoykMeadslsess
less (1995) than Decatur employees, consumed more alcohol, and had significantly different (p
fr --
vas
00216
(<l.o0w0e1r)),meHaDnLm(ehaisguherre)m,etnrtisgolyfcaelrkidaelsin(elopwheor)s,phaantdasMeC(HloCwera)c,rotsotsalbobtihlitriubmienp(ehriigohdes,r), glucose bHaesaeldthonefifneccrtseasstiundgiPedF:OTSoledveetlesr:mihneemiaftothleorgeyw(ehreemadtiofcfreirte,ncheesmoingltohbeifno,llRoBwCisn,g pWaBraCme,teprlsatelet acomuinnto)t,racnlsinfiecraalsec,heamliasntirnieesam(ianloktarlainnesfpehroasspeh,attoatsael,agndamdimraectglbuitliarmuyb!int,rbanlsofoedrausre,eaasnpiatrrtoagteen, tcrriegaltyicneirnied,esg)l,ucaonsde,hochromloenstaelropla,rlamoewtedernss(ictoyrtliispoolp,rdoetehiyndsr,oheipgihanddernossitteyrloinpeopsruoltfeaitnes,,esatnrdadiol, hfoolrlimcolenestbiimnudliantigngglohbourlmionn,er,ee17t-easltpohsatehryodner,oxbyopurnogdetsetsetroosnteer,onleu,teainndizitnhgyrhooirdmsotniem,ulpartoilnagctin, sex
wDeaitgahtc,olalnedctbiloonomdeptrheosdssu:re, Maenddicsatlanqduaersdticolinnniaciarle,chbelmoiosdtrsyeraansdamhpelmeast,olmoegaysutresetms,enatnsd opfulhemiognhat,ry
iDnetraeipolrst.onDdaattaaocnolblleocotdiocno:llQeucetisotnio(nanmaoiurnet,coenttee.n)tn,odtepsirgonv,idaeddm.inistration, etc. was not provided
MSienrnuemsoPtFaOuSsimnegahsiugrhe-dpeinrf1o9r9m5anbcye3liMq'usidEcnhvriormoantmeongtraalphTyecthhneromloosgpyrSaeyrmviacsesspiencSttr.omPeatulr,y. In p1e9r9f7,ortmhaensceerluimqusiadmcphlreosmwaetroegraanpahlyyzeeldecbtyroAspdrvaaynmcaesdsBsipoaencatlryotmiectarlyServices, Inc. using high-
Exposure period: Unknown. PFOS serum levels are surrogates for exposure.
Description/delineation of workers' sera were grouped
exposure groups/categories: for cach plant as: 0 <I ppm;
The PFOS 1- <3 ppm;
levels detected in 3 - < 6 ppm; >=
6
ppm
PFOS.
Distributionof Employees by Year andPFOS levels
1995: Antwerp (n = 88 39%<I0pp-m PFOS 36%1-<3ppm PFOS 22% 3-<6ppm 3% >6 p=pm
1995: Decatur (n = 90) 12%0-<1 ppm PFOS 66%1-<3ppm PFOS 18% 3-<6ppm 4% >=6 ppm
1997: Antwerp (n = 65 48% 0-<1 ppm PFOS 38% 1-<3 ppm PFOS 14% 3-<6ppm 0>=6 ppm [----------
1997: Decatur (n =84) 35% 0-<I ppm PFOS 45% 1-<3 ppm PFOS 14% 3-<6ppm 6%>=6 ppm
vas
onnnay
Measured or estimated exposure: Serum PFOS levels are surrogates for exposure. No worker
exposure data are available.
Statistical methods:
analysisofvariance,
Descriptive simple and stratified
and multivariable regression used
analyses, Pearson correlatiocnoefficients,
to evaluate associations between PFOS
and each hematological and clinical chemistry test and hormonal assay.
alcohol consumption, and cigarette use as potential confounders.
Adjusted
for age,
BMI,
Other methodological information:
RESULTS
Describe results:
0-<1ppm
1-<3ppm
3-<6 ppm
2 6 ppm
Distribution of Serum PFOS
1995
1997
Antwerp
34
Decatur
11
Antwerp
31
32
59
25
19
16
21
3
4
0
Decatur
29
38
12
5
In 1995 for both locations combined, PFOS was. significantly (p<.05) correlated with HDL (negative association), total bilirubin (negative), WBC (positive) and platelets (negative ). In
(1p9o9si7tifvoer),boatlhanlionceataimoinnsotcroamnbsifneerda,seP(FpOosSitwivaes),sidginriefcticbainltilryubcionrr(enleagtaetdivwei)t,hcahoglees(ptoesriotliv(ep)o,siBtiMvIe), LDL (positive) and hematocrit (negative).
The means of the 4 PFOS categories combined across both plants were all significantly different from each other. The youngest employees had the lowest PFOS levels. Ofall of the clinical
chemistries and hematological parameters, only total bilirubin had significant (p<.05) differences in means from the lowest exposure category (0 - <1 ppm) for both years. The lowest mean
platelet count was observed at the highest PFOS exposure category in both years, although they were not significantly different across categories.
Using linear regression and adjusting for potential confounders, PFOS was significantly (p<.10)
associated in both years only for total bilirubin. In oneofthe 2 years, PFOS was associated with
direct
`These
bilirubin creatinine,
variables were then
cholesterol, LDL,
separated by plant
HDL, hematocrit,
location and year.
hemoglobin, and platelet
Only total bilirubin and
count.
HDL
were significantly (negatively) associated with PFOS for at least one plant location for both time
inpebroitohdsy.eaTrostaalndbinloirsuibginnifhiacdanat saisgsnoicfiiactainotnneatgatthievAenatswseocripatpiloanntwiftorh cPiFthOerSyfeoarr.theHDDeLcawtausrplant
significantly negatively associated with PFOS in Antwerp in both years but not significantly
associated with PFOS in Decatur in either year.
Dra tidtsssmes Bepor- Append V
vas
c0d218
`There was the serum
no evidenceof a levels measured.
dTehcelionveerianlslelreuvmelcshboeletswteeernolpalsanstosciaantdedowvietrhboatnhiynecarreassweeirnePnOotS
at
statistically significant. Cholesterol levels by PFOS serum levels are presented below.
Serum Cholesterol Levels by Plant and Year
0-<ippm 1-<3ppm 3-<6ppm 26pm
1995 Antwerp 220 206 217 223 F=06 p=06
Decatur 215 21 209 206 F=05 p=07
0-<ippm 1-<3ppm 3-<6ppm 26pm
1997 Antwerp 192 213 228 228 F=29 p=01
Decatur 204 218 20 29 F=20 p=01
eSmixptlyo-yoeneesewmapslolyoeweesrptahratnictihpaatteodf itnhebi1o9m9o5nietmoprlionygeefosrabnodthhiygeahresr. thTahnethmaetaonfathgee 1of99t7hese
eTmwpelnotyye-esse.veCnhoolfetshteer6o1leamnpdlLoyDeLeswweerreesifgrnoimfitchanetAlynthwieghreprpilnantth.e 6T1hepsaerteimcipplaonytseeisn h19a9d7.
shiiggnhiefriccahnotlleystheirgohlervamleuaesntPhFanOtSheexApnotswuerersp,pwaertriecispiagnntisfiicnan1t9l9y7o.ldReer,gahraddlegsrseoatfeprlBanMtIsloacantdion,
`mean PFOS levels were measurements in 1995.
higher
for
those
employees
who
were
selected
for
hormone
Thihgehemsetaenxpaogseuroef tchaetelgoowreys;ttPheFreOfSoree,xpmoesaurneDcHatEeAgSor,y (107--<HP,1)fwicaeste1s0toysetaerrsonleesasntdhabnouthnadt of the
etxesptoossutreerocnaetelgeovreilzsaattiotnhse.thAidsjeuxsptoisnugreforletvheel dwiefrfeergernecaetserinthaagne t(haecmoenafonusnodferthfeorhimgahleer PFOS
tsiegsntiofsitcearnotneashsoocrimaotnioenslebveeltsw)eaenndPoFthOeSr caonndfothuendheorrsmoinnetshearneaglryezsesdi,onexmcoedpetlfsorreessutlrtaeddioiln no
However, (3
when
one
employee
with
12.83
ppm
PFOS
serum
level,
confounded
by
a
high
BMI
kg/m?) was excluded from the analysis, the finding was no longer significant.
--------
vas
0219
Study strengths and weaknesses: Cross-sectional design, voluntary participation, small bnoutmhbteirmoefpeemrpioldosy.eTehserwiewthasPFaOlSarlgeevetlusmaobvoevrer6atpepbme,twleoewnptahreti2cisptautdiyonyeraatres i(nonbloyth61pleamntpsloiynees `ancdomtmhoeny atlosbooctahnnsottudbyepecroinosdis)d.ereTdhienddaetpaenwdeernetcpoompublianteidonsa.croTshse2sseirteusmthlaetvewlesroefvPeFrOySdimffaeryenbte,. bNeoloocwctuhpeatnioo-ncaflfeecxtploesvuelreindaltaabwaenrimeaclosl.leSceterdumatPeiFtOheSr mplaanyt.not accurately reflect body burden. `This study provides data on PFOS serum levels and biological parameters not studied before, and provides a comparisonofthese data across plants
Research sponsors: 3M
Consistency of results: Thereare no other studiesof thiskind on PFOS; however, the results of
the hepatic Burris JM,
and lipid clinical chemistry tests have been published. The reference is: Mandel JH, Zobel LR Serum Perfluorooctane sulfonate and hepatic and
Olsen GW, lipid clinical
chemistry tests in fluorochemical production employees. JOEM. Sept. 1999;41:799-806.
CONCLUSIONS `The authors concluded that among Antwerp and Decatur male employees, significant hematological, clinical chemistry and hormonal abnormalities were not associated with scrum PFOS concentrations less than 6 ppm.
RinEveFsEtiRgaEtNioCnoEfcOllisneincaGlWc,hemBiusrtrriisesJ.M,HeMmaantdoelloJgHy,aZnodbehlorLmR.oneAspriinlr2e2l,ati1o9n98t.o sAenruempildeevmelisoloofgic perfluorooctane sulfonate in male fluorochemical production employees. 3M Medical Department. FYI-0300-01378.
OTHER There are several methodological issues that should be noted. They are:
1)
Cross-sectional association.
design
does
not
allow
for
a
direct
analysisofthe
temporality
ofan
2)
The voluntary participation.
participation
rates
were
low
as
both
production
sites
had
less
than
50%
3) Gbiiovleongitchael saucscpoemcmteoddaltoinognhatlof-tlhiefeeofffecPtFsOoSf,PiFt OmSaywhbiecchonwcoeuilvdabmlientihmaitztehetrheempaosysibbeilsitoyme
of finding an association
4) Serum PFOS measurements may reflect body burden. In the cynomolgus primate, liver
tdiossseuegrcoounpcse)n.traHtoiwoenvsearp,prinoxtihmeartate,dtshiesruramtiPoFwOaSs ilnevtehlesruapngtoe o1f003:p1p1m0 6(:l1o.w- and mid-
5) Temhpel2oycereosssw-seercetisotnuadlieadnailnysbeosthcaynenaorts (bdeuveiteoweladrgaes tiunmdoevpeenrdbeenttwpeoepnulsattuidoynsyeaasrs6)1.
6) 7)
TThheerpeuclsoautlidlebneamtueraesoufrseommenet oefrrtohre ihnoirmmpoonretsansttcudoinefdouhnadsirnegsuvlatreidabilnesp.rior
recommendations that mean hormone measurements should be the resultofpooled blood
from multiple samples taken at short intervals; however, this was not feasible in this
study.
rat ntlsessmentReport Append V
var
000220
ROBUST SUMMARY - RS9
Title: Serum Fluorochemical Levels in Sumitomo employees, 1999
TEST SUBSTANCE
Identity: PFOS
Remarks:
METHOD
Study design: Cross-sectional.
Manufacturing/Processing/Use: Processing and formulation of fluorochemicals into products.
Hypothesis tested: To determine PFOS serum levels in employees at the Sumitomo, Japan 3M Plant
Study period: 3 weeks in March 1999
Setting: Occupational--Sumitomo 3M employees, Sagamihara Plant, Japan.
Total population: Total numberofemployees working at this plant was not provided in the report.
`Subject selection criteria: Voluntary participation in medical surveillance program at Sumitomo 3M Plant.
Total #ofsubjects in study: 94 volunteers (managerial and production employees)
Comparison population: Sagamihara plant management employees (n = 32) and management employees from the Tokyo Head Office (n = 30)
Participation rate: Not provided.
Subject description: Across all 3 "exposure groups", the age range was 31 ~ 67 years old. No other information was provided.
Health effects studied: PFOS levels in blood
Data collection methods: Blood sera samples
Details on data collection: Sera was analyzed for fluorochemicals using high-pressure, liquid chromatography/clectrospray tandem mass spectrometry. The LLOQ for PFOS was 0.0314 ppm.
rot iil Assam Report ppendc
vas
conz21
Exposure period: N/A
eDmespclroiypeteison(/nd=el3i2n)e;atSiaognaomfiehxarpaosure groups/eategories: Sagamihara Plant production p3l0a)n,t4m0ankamgefmreomntSaegmapmliohyaereas P(lna=nt32); Management employees from Tokyo Head Office (n =
Measured or estimated exposure: PFOS serum level is surrogate for exposure
Statistical methods: those employees with
Descriptive values less
statistics and t-tests than the LLOQ)
(calculated
using
the
LLOQ
value
for
Other methodological information:
RESULTS
3De8s%corfibteherepslualntts:ma2n4aogfem94enetmpelmopyleoeyseehsadhasdersuemrulmevleelvsel<sL<LLOQL.OQ, and 40%ofTokyo office, PFOS was quantifiable in all production employees.
Sagamihara Plant production 0.0475-0.628 ppm.
employees:
arithmetic
mean
PFOS
level
=
0.135
ppm,
range
Sagamihara ppb
Plant
management
employees:
arithmetic
mean
PFOS
40.3
ppb,
range
31.9-
56.6
Management 96.7 ppb
employees
from
Tokyo
Head
Office:
arithmetic mean PFOS 52.3 ppb, range 33 --
`The arithmetic mean (0.135 for both managers' groups.
ppm)
was
significantly
different
(p<.05)
than
the
mean
PFOS
value
Study strengths and weaknesses: information on the employees.
No
information
on
exposure
in
the
workplace,
no
descriptive
Research sponsors: 3M
Consistency of results: No other processing employees have been sampled.
CONCLUSIONS wTehreeabuetlhoowrstchoosnecolfudweodrktheartssaetrtuhmeP3FMOSAnltewveelrsopfanSdagDaemciahtuarraplPalntasn.t production employees
REFERENCE FBulruroirsocJ,heOmlisceanlGLWev,elMsanindeSlumJiHt,oSmcohu3mMpeErmtpJlCo.yeSeesp,tFeimnbaelrRe3,po1r9t9,9.3MDeMteedrimcianlatDieopnaorftmSeenrtu,m Epidemiology, 220-3W-05. FYL0500-01378,
[----------
vas
000222
OTHER
Ovanial Assessment Report Appendic
van c00223
ROBUST SUMMARY - RS 10
TMiuttlaet:ioEnvaTleusattiWointohfLt5h1e8M7uYtaMgoenuisceALcytimvpithyoomfaT-Ce6l9l0s6(iWnitahn /InndVeipternodMeantmmReapleiaat)n,C1a9ll98Gene TEST SUBSTANCE Identity: T-6906; N-E{FOSE alcohol
Remarks: "Creme coloured solids" purity 97%; Identification: T-6906 batch 040016. METHOD
Method/guideline: L133 & L248
OECD
Guideline
476;
EEC
Directive
67/548/EEC,
EEC
Publication
No.
`Test type: Reverse mutation assay Test System: Mammalian cell line GLP: Yes (OECD Principles of Good Laboratory Practice). Year study performed: 1998
Species/Strain: LS187Y mouse lymphoma cells. Metabolic activation: S9 from Aroclor-induced adult male Wistar rat liver added at 8% v/v. Statistical methods: None
Remarks:
Study Design:
Concentration: Rangefinding test: 3, 10, 33, 100, 333, and 1000 g/ml with and without 9;
Experiment 1: 10, 9; Experiment 2:
18, 10,
33 42, 56, 75 & 100 20, 30, 40, 45, 50 &
ug/ml without $9; 33, 55 ug/ml without $9;
100, 333 & 10, 33, 100,
1000 175,
pg/ml with 250, 375, 500
&750 pg/ml with 9
Numberofreplicates: 2
Platesest: two 96-well plates/concentration for
plates/concentration for cloning efficiency mutation frequency (~2000 cells/well).
(~1
celliwell;
three
96-well
Solvent: Dimethylsulfoxide (final concentration in culture medium not specified).
Pwoistihtoiuvte ccaolnctiroulms:anWditmhaoguntes8i9:ume)t;hywlimtehtSh9a:nedsiumleftohnyaltnei(t1romsaMmiinne H(a0n.5k'ms MbalinanHcaendk'sasltbaslolauntcieodn,salt
solution, without calcium and magnesium)
RESULTS
Cclyotnoitnogxiefcfciocinecnecnytratatainoyn:doIsner(atnegstefmiantdeirniagltepsrtewciiptihta$t9e,dnaot hriegdhuecsttiodnoswe)a.s sWcitehoinutce$ll9,ncuemllbecrouonrt
#agn/dmlc.lonIinngExepfefriciimeenncty i1,mmweitdhioauttelSy9,afctoencternetartamteinotnsweorfe56reudgu/cmeld saingdnihfiigchaenrtlwyearte3"3t3ooantdoxi1c,0f0o0r
further testing." In the presenceof$9, no severe toxicity was seen and all dose levels were
rat itlsess Report Append
vai
oceozza
wevearleua"t1e0d0 ftoorximcu"taagnedniicnitthye.prIenseexnpceeroifmeSn9t, 2c,onwcietnhtoruattiSo9n,scoofnc3e7n5traantdio5n0so0fji5g0/malnwder55e "gt/oomtoxic"
and were not evaluated for mutagenicity.
mGuetnaonttoxfirceqeufefencctys:wiNtoh Sin9crweaassesciennmuotnalnytatftrheequheingchyessteednosweitihnoeuxtpeS9r;imaenntap1p,abruetntthiinscwraesa.se in
confounded by precipitation of test material no significant increase in mutant frequency
(i.., unphysiological was seen without S9.
conditions). In Slight increases
experiment in mutant
2,
mfarteeqruieanlcpyraetci7p5i0taatinodn 2a5t 075p0g/umgl/m(lnoatnddosaen-parboeprorratntiodnoasle)-wrietshpoSn9sewecrurevaelsfoorcsounrfvoiuvanlde(dsebeytatbelset).
ARletmhaorukgsh:thAe sstuumdymaaurtyhoofrsthceonrcelsuuldtesodfthtahtethtewotesetxpmearteirmieanlts"isiscpornessiednetreeddimnutthaegteanbilce ibneltohwe.
pprroecseednucreoesffSo9r-tmhiixs,a"sstahyi,s cisonafhoiugnhdliynqguebsytiteosntabmlateecroinacllupsriecoinp.itaDteivoina,tainodnsabfeorrrmatsitoannsdianrddose-
nreosvpaolnisdecroenlcaltuisoinsohnispscafnorbteodxircaiwtynafnrdomputthaetmi.ve Imnuteaxgpeenriicmietnytr2e,ndweirthth$e9,redsoulstes lqeuveesltsioonfa3b7le5,aanndd
m5a0t0erpiga/lmplrewceirpeitdatiesdcairndtehdeatsrbeeaitmnegn1t0m0etdoxiiucm,,buwtatsh(eihniagphpreorplreivaetleloyf)7i5n0clgu/demdl,inatthweheivcahlutahteiotenst
of mutagenicity.
rat nial sessmesReport Append
va
CO02RS
Summary of Cytotoxic and Mutagenic Response of L5178Y Cells to N-EtFOSE Alcohol
Concentration
(ng/ml)
Relative Cell Survival|
(% Control)
CE at Day 3 (%)| MutationFrequency
x10
[SoheniComol
100 Tm Experiment 1, Without S9
[es
|
[ E [B e ffe o imes m ff f3r aysas]|
Fosiive Control GS)[82
[79
[555
|
Solve Conol [10 ExperimentT1,oWisth 9 Tra
pfe so fm w e a]
foFosoitve Conbol ONT)[01 r6 5f1 f e 7 i5 e8 ]|
SolvenConol [100 Experiment 2, os Without S9 [75
|
f fp s o o s Tf os e e w n a a ]
Posive Conia (EVES) [8
OJ s es
f[B SlovoewConmol TT m Ex1 perimenttm 2,f Wew0 imth S9 a 0 faaa rs 7 ]
[ os yh w es f] aa]
FPosive Conrol OVI)[10
[[ 3 sie]
CONCLUSIONS
Methodological problems prevent reaching definitive conclusions. Dr. Brian Myhr, Associate
DirectorofGenetic and Cellular Toxicology at Covance Laboratories, Vienna, VA, has prepared a detailed nine-point critiqueofthis study, and concludes that the results are "not believable `without confirmation under better assay conditions." His criticisms include:
Inadequate identification ofmouse lymphoma test strain;
Useofexcessive, potentially toxic levels of S9 mix;
Use of an inappropriate positive control chemical for the non-activation assay;
LTeoerfmomSTi. evto,aCoveLabor oP. Licht, 3M, hy 1199
000226
Poor detection ofsmall colony mutants; Useofexcessively high concentrationsoftest chemical in mutation assays; Useofan excessively long mutant expression period (3 days); Useofinsufficiently large numbersofcells for mutation assays; and Over-interpretationofstudy results.
REFERENCE
NOTOX. 1998. Gene Mutation
Evaluationofthe Test With LS187Y
Mutagenic Activity Mouse Lymphoma
ofT-6906 in an In Vitro Cells (With Independent
Mammalian Repeat)
Cell
NOTOX Project 223458
------
vas
000227
ROBUST SUMMARY- RS11
Title: MUTAGENICITY ASSAY, 1996
TEST
ON
T-6292
IN
AN
IN
V10
MOUSE
MICRONUCLEUS
TEST SUBSTANCE
Identity: T-6292, N-EFOSE alcohol
Remarks: Amber waxy solid; purity not reported; Identification: T-6292 METHOD
Method/guideline: No regulatory guideline
Test type: micronucleus assay
GLP: Yes
Year study performed: 1996
Species/Strain: Mouse; Crl:CD-1 (ICR) BR
Sex: Male and female
No.of animals: 5/sex/dose
Route of administration: Oral gavage in acetone:comn oil (40:60 v/v) emulsion.
Doses/concentration levels: 550, 1100, and 2200 mg/kg
Frequency of treatment: Single dose; subgroups examined after 24, 48, and 72 hours.
hSteatteirsotgiecanleomuest)hpordosp:ortAinoanlsyosfiscoeflvlsarwiiathncmeicornonuunctlreain,sffoolrlmoewde(dobrryaDnukntnreatnts'fotersmteidf sifivganirfiiacnacnte.
sRteudmya.rkAs:ranAgdeuflitndmiincges(taudgye (439/sdeaxy/sdoastet)iwmeeroefdcoosnidnugc)tewderweitqhuadroasnetsionfed10f0or0,7 1d4a0y0s,p1r8io0r0,to2200, saenldec2t6e0d0fomrgm/kagi,nasdtmuidnyibsatesreeddobnyhoyrpaolacgtaivvaigtey sineeanceattodnoes:ecsoomfo1il40su0smpegn/skiogn.or mDoorsee, laenvdelosne 1de0autph aotf2S2/0s0exmrge/ckegi.vinTghethmeahiinghstduodsyeulseveedlgwraosupusosefd St/osreexp/ldaocsee/phrairmvaersyt htiimgeh.-dAosseecaonnidmaarlys that pdioesdi.tivFeicvoenmtraolles(cayncdlofpivheosfpehmaamliedser,ec8e0ivmign/gkvge)hiwcelree(eaxcaetmoinnee:dcofmoromili,cr40o:n6u0c,le1i0amtl2/4kgh)ouarnsdafter sdotsuidnyg.forAslilgannsoimfaltosxiwceirtey.obFseemrovreadl ibmomneedimaatrerloywafwtaersdroescionvgeraendd apterthieoddiecsailglynattherdouhgahrvoeustttthieme aGnedimsspar.eaCdoodnesdlisdleisd,esfiwxeerdeinanmaeltyhzaendolf,oraPndCEst/aNinCeEd wraittiho Maandy-1G,r0u0n0wPaClEd pseolruatniionmaflolwleorweedscboyred for micronuclei.
ref niAssam Report Appedic
vas
000228
RESULTS
`Toxicity: females at
Significant bone all dose levels at
marrow toxicity was the 72 hour harvest,
evidenced by reduced and in positive control
PCE/NCE females.
ratio
seen
in
`doGseen.otToxhiecpeofsfietcitvse: cNonetgraotlivperoduncoedintchreeaesxepeinctmeidcrsoignnuicfliecaatntedinpcorleyacsherionmamtiiccroenruyctlherioccyotmespaarteadny
to vehicle females).
control
(3.36
+
0.97%
v.
0.02
+
0.2%
in
males
and
4.52
+
0.72%
v.
0.14
+
0.06
in
tRoeximcairtyk,sa:s eAvniidmeanlcsedinbayllhytproeaacttmievnittgyr(osuopmsereaclesiovwiintghNe-xEc(esFsOiSveEsaallciovhaotilosn)hoswhoerdtlsyiganfsteorfdosing. o`tThheerslorwe-mdaoisneedanhiympaolasctainved.soHmieghm-iddo-sdeoasneimmaallessdheavdelroepceodvedryesdpnbeya,20r.o4uhgohuhrasirafctoeartds,oshiunngc;hed p4o7s.t5urheo,urssquaifnttereddoesyiensg,.anOdncehmriomdo-ddaocsreyfoermrahleea,waasndalosnoefhoiugnhd-ddoesaedfaetm6a8l.e4whaosurfsoaufntderddeoasdinagt. CONCLUSIONS
N-E(FOSE alcohol erythrocytes.
was
negative
for
inducing
micronuclei
in
mouse
bone
marrow
polychromatic
REFERENCE
Murli, H. 1996. Mutagenicity Test Coming Hazleton Inc., Vienna, VA
on T-6292 in an Jn Vivo Mouse Micronucleus Assay. 22182. Final Report, May 2, 1996. CHV Study No.
17384-
0-455. Submitted to 3M, St Paul, Minnesota, 55144-1000.
Dra ilsesResport Append V
vas
000229
ROBUST SUMMARY- RS12
`Title: 1993
MUTAGENICITY
TEST
ON
T-5710
IN
AN
IN
VIVO RAT
MICRONUCLEUS
ASSAY,
TEST SUBSTANCE
Identity: T-5710, N-EIFOSE alcohol
Remarks: (1-5710)
Cream-colored granular material; purity not reported;
Identification:
L-10059
METHOD
Method/guideline: FIFRA Guideline 84-2
Test type: In vivo rat micronucleus assay
GLP: Yes
Year study performed: 1993
Species/Strain: Charles River Sprague-Dawley rats.
Sex: Male and female
No. Animals: S/sex/dose
Route of administration: Oral gavage in com oil suspension.
Doses/concentration levels: 1250,2500, and 5000 625, 1250 mg/kg in com oil (10 ml/kg), Trial IT
mg/kg
in
com
oil
(20
ml/kg),
Trial
I;
312.5,
Frequency of treatment: Single dose; subgroups examined after 24, 48, and 72 hours. cSetlaltsiswtiitchalmimcertohnoudcsl:ei,AnfaollylsoiwseodfvbyarTiuaknecye'soSntsuqdueanrteizreodotraanrgeesitneset-rwiatnhsfaodrjmuesdtmpernoptforotrimounlstoifple comparisonsifsignificant.
ARneimmaarlkss:werAedurlatndraotmsi(zaepdpraonxdimwaetieglhye8d wpreieokrstoolddo)siwnegr.eGqruoaurpasnotifne5d/sfeoxr/7dodsacy/shaprrvieosrtttoimsteuwdye.re
cusoemdp,opulnusdatno abdediutsieodn,alif8n/eseedxed(T,riaaslr)epolrac1e0m/esnetxs(fTroiraalnIi)matlhsattrhaetcediiveeddptrhieorhitoghcedlolsheaorfvesttes.t Five
pmoaslietsivaencdonftirvoelf(emcaylcelsoprheocsepihvaimngidvee,hi6c0lem(gc/okmg oiinl,st2e0rilmeUd/ekigoinnizTerdiawlaIt,er1,0 1m0Umklg/kign)TrwiearleIT) and
p`eerxiaomdiinceadllayt t2h4rohuoguhrosuatfitehredsotsiundgy.foArlsligannsiomfatlosxiwceirtey.obMsearnvyedaniimmmaeldsiaitneTlryiaalftIedrideodsianngd aalnld
baneaclyasmies,msooritbheuntrdiaplrwioarstaobtohreteedndaonfdtThreiasltIuldyw.asTcooondfuecwteadn.imTailbsiaslurbvoinveedmtaorprroowviwdaesarveacloivdered
--------
var
00050
GatrtuhnewdaelsdigsnoaltuteidohnafrovelsltowteidmebyanGdeismpsraea.d Coondseldidessl,idfeisxewderien maentahlaynzoeld,faorndPCstEa/inNeCdEwirtahtiMoaayn-d 1,000 PCE per animal were scored for micronuclei.
RESULTS
`Toxicity: No significant bone marrow toxicity was seen, based on the PCE/NCE ratio
dGoesneo.to`xThiecpeofsfietcitvse: cNonetgraotlivpero-d-uncoedintchreeaesxepeinctmeidcrsoingnuicfliecaatntedinpcorleyacsherionmamtiiccroenruyctlherioccyotmepsaarteadny
10 controls females).
(4.64
0.64%
v.
0.12
0.05%
in
males
and
3.12
+
0.70%
v.
0.12
0.04%
in
oRfemtoaxrikcist:y (TartiaaxliaI)wwaassabsoeretneadtdaullcdtooseexscaetssaibvoeutmo5rthaoluirtsyaafntdermdoorsiibnugn.diLtoy.w-IannTdrimaildI-I,doesveidence
`groups recovered by and two males were
~23 hours; found dead
high-dose animals at ~71 hours.
remained
ataxic
through
the
endof
the
study
CONCLUSIONS
N-EWFOSE alcohol erythrocytes.
was
negative
for
inducing
micronuclei
in
rat
bone
marrow
polychromatic
REFERENCE
`MWuarslhii,nHg.ton1,99V3i.enMnuat,agVeAnic2i21t8y2T.estFionnalTR-e5p7o1r0t,inAparnilJn23V,iv1o99R3.at MHiWcrAonSutculdeyusNoA.ssa1y5.51H6a-z0l4e5t4o.n
Dra idl ses Report Append
var
oceania
ROBUST SUMMARY- RS13
`DTiNtlAe:SGYENNTOHTEOSXIISCAINTDY CTEELSLT PORNOTL-I57F1E0R.1ATIINOTNHAESISNAVYIVION/RIANTVILTIRVEORUCNESLCLHS,ED1U99L3ED TEST SUBSTANCE
Identity: T-5710, N-E{FOSE alcohol
Remarks: Cream-colored granular material; purity not reported; Identification: T-5710.1 METHOD
Method/guideline: Williams 1980, Mirsalis et al. 1982; Butterworth 1987
"Test type: In Vivo/ln Vitro Unscheduled DNA synthesis and cell proliferation in rat liver cells. `Test System: Primary cells from animals dosed in vivo
GLP: Yes
Year study performed: 1993
Species/Strain/cell (CRL:CD BR).
type/cell
line:
Primary
hepatocytes
from
male
Sprague-Dawley
rat
Metabolic activation: NA
Statistical methods: For UDS assay: ProcedureofCasciano and Gaylor (1983). For cell ptrroalnisffeorramtaitoinoansosafy:daotnaew-awsaypearnfaolrysmiesdofivfavrariiaanncceesfwoellroewehdetbeyroDguennnoeuts)s.t-test (rank REMARKS
Study Design:
UDS Assay:
G`mratoeuripasl.oAf3ddirattiso/ndaolseg/rtoiumpespoofitnthrreeceeirveecdeiavesdintghleevoerhailcgleavoargpeosdiotsievoefcoonnterolo.f tThirmeeepdooisnetssofwteerset2-
3obhtoauirnsedabndy p1e5r-f1u6sihoonurosfraaftterlidveorsiinngsiwthu ewnithhecpaaltcociyutmeasnwdermeaghnarevseistuemd.freHeeHpaatnokcsytbeaslawnecreed salts
containing 0.5 mM cthyleneglycol-bis(B-aminoethy!ether)-N N-ietraacetic acid (EGTA) and
(HWeMpeEs).bufCfeelrl,spwHer7e.2,cuflotlulroewdeidn bWy M50E-1w0i0thun1it0s%/mfleotfalcoblolvaigneensaesreuimn(WFiBlSl)iaimnscMuletdurieudmisEhes
containing plastic coverslips. After incubation for2 hours at about 37C to allow attachment,
utrniattiattaecdhtehdycmeildlsinweer(4e7rCeim/omvmeodlca)n.d cAufltteurrea mleabdeiliunmg rpeeprliaocdeod wf4ithhouWrsM, Ecelclosnwtearineirnegfe1d04wCiitfhml
WME + 10% FBS containing 0.25 mM thymidine and incubated for 18-19 hours. Nuclei were
then swollen by addition of 1% sodium citrate for 7-10 minutes, cells were fixed in acetic acid:
LO --------
vas
000222
aetshsaensosled(1b:y3)c,oaunndtidnrgiendu.clFeiaxregdracionvserasnldipssuwbterraectpirnogctehseseadvefroargaeutnourmabdieorgroafgprhya.insUDinSnuwcalseus csoivzeerdsalriepa(so3 fcocvyetrospllipass/ma.niTmhale)nweet rneucmleeaasrugrreadinacnodunatvseroange5d0 froar ncdaocmhltyresaeltemcetnetdccoenldlistipoenr. Doses: 203, 405, 810 mg/kg Number of replicates: One
Animals/dose: Three per timepoint (2 timepoints). Solvent: Com oil (10 ml/kg)
Positive controls: Dimethylnitrosamine, 10 mg/kg. CfeorllpoPsriotliivfeercaotnitornolA)sswaeyr:eGdroosuepdsaosfffoirvteheyoUuDnSg maaslsaeya7du2lthoCurrls:bCefDoBrRe Ssapcarrifaigcue.e-ADtawalbeoyutratthse(4 ssuarmfeactei)mweit"htharneeAdlazyest p2rMiLorItoossamcortiificcep,u"mtphesleoaadneidmawlisthwe2rmeliomfplBarndtUedssoulubtciuotnan(e2o0umsgl/yml()do.rsa7l2 Hfioxuerdsinafnteeurtdroaslibnugf,felirveedr afonrdmaalicnr.ossP-asreacftifoinno-femdbuedoddeednsuemct(iloanbsel(i5ngumco)ntfrrool)m wtheerelerftelmaotevreald,arnidght dmeetdeicatne,d ainmdmurnioghhtisanttoecrhieomrilcoablelsyanwditfhrDomABdusotdaienn.umOnwceereappprreopparrieadt.e sCtealilnipnrgooliffedruatoidoennwuams sceocutnitoinnsgwoafslacboenlfeidrmceeldl,sawnadssptearinfionrgmwedasuscionngfitrhemeldeftaslastiemriallalroboen. aAltl tlheraeset 2li0v0er0lnoubcelseiexpaemrined, a`tanriamanldowmerbeyecxoammpiunteedr)fpreormseactmiionni.mumofthree sections, covering 8 microscope fields (selected
RESULTS
Genotoxic any dose.
Effects:
No
increase
in
net
nuclear
grains
or
%
cells
with
>
5
net
nuclear
grains
at
Cell Proliferation to controls.
Effects:
No
increase
in
proportionof
labeled
liver
cells
at
any
dose
compared
Remarks: There were no test-specific confounding factors
of nissn Reps Append
va
ceo223
In Vivo/In Vitro UDS and Liver Cell Proliferation in Rats Dosed with N-EXFOSE alcohol
Mean Net Nuclear Grains
|
%
Cells with = Net Nuclear Grains
|
Percent of Labeled Hepatocytes
Control
0042037
0.73068
hod
267
0.73040
hid
0610.18
203wmhe sm
Ris $10mke
Positive Control
(DMN 15 mg/kg)
0434040
733
0.630.41
73
0.05+054
72
20.10023
33
075020
733
0400.12
267
029%140
933
040048
13
-024+1.07
667
395236
igi
4053.38
38.00
5012262
an
0264026 TORT PT
315141586
CONCLUSIONS
N-E(FOSE alcohol was negative for inducing Unscheduled DNA synthesis.
REFERENCE
CSiyfnotnhee,siMs.aAn.d C1e9l9l3.PrGoelniofetroaxtiicointAysTseasyt iOnnRaTt-5L7i1v0e.r1Ceilnltsh.eHIanzVlievtoo/nlnWaVsihtirnogUtnosnc,hVeideunlnead VDANA
22182. Final Report, September 14. HWA Corporation, St Paul, MN 55144-1000.
Study
No.
15516-0-494
Submitted
to
3M
DriassesReprs pedi
var 0enz34
ROBUST SUMMARY - RS14
CTiOtlMe:POINUNVIDTSRTO-M22I4C7RCOoBCIAOLNODGTI-C2A24L8MCUoTC,AG1E97N8ICITY ASSAYS OF 3M COMPANY TEST SUBSTANCE
pIedrefnltiutoyr:oocTt-a2n2e4su7lCfoonCa;teLi-n42w9a9t,era 50% by weight solutionof the diethanolammonium salt of pTy-r2i2d4i8niCuomCc;hl2o2r.id5e%soalfat orfeaanctiNo-nmeptrhoydlupcteorffleutohryolocatnadnmseutlhfyolnammeitdhoaectrhyalnaotels-baansded22gl.u5t%aorfylthe amide.
Remarks:
METHOD
Method/Guideline Mayer, 1973
followed:
Ames
etal,
1975;
Zimmermann
and
Schwaier,
1967;
Brusick
and
`Test type: Reverse Mutation; Recombination
Test system: Salmonella typhimurium; Saccharomyces cerevisiae GLP:N
Year study performed: 1978
Species/Strainicell-type/cell line: TA100; Saccharomyees cerevisiae
Salmonella D3
typhimurium
TA1535,
TA1537,
TA1S38,
TAOS,
Metabolic activation: 0.5 ml of 10% S9 liver homogenate from Aroclor 1254 induced rats
Cweo/npcleatnet,ra1t0i0o0nsugt/epsltaetde:,
Plate
5000
pign/cpolraptoeration
assay:
10
ug/plate,
50
pg/plate,
100
pg/plate,
500
DYeesassitcraetcoormmbeitnhaotdi:on0:.10.m1l%/,de0s.si5c%a,to1r.,00%.,55m.i0e%ssicator, 1.0 ml/dessicator, 5.0 ml/dessicator
Yeast repeat assay at 1.0%, 2.0%, 4.0%, 5.0%
Statistical methods used: None
SR.ecmearrekviss:iaTehaesrseawyewreerneopseirgfnoifrimceadntwpirtohtobcootlhdcehveiamtiicoanlss. (a1n).d wTihtehpolanteepilnactoerppoerratteisotncaosnscaeyntraantdiotnh;e tohnelydesstsriacianstoTr Aas9s8ayawnadsTpAe1r0f0orfmoerdtwheitthesTt.-2H2o4w7evCeor,C guisvienngtthewocopmlpatleesxipteyrocfotnhceentdreastsiiocnatbourtaussseady and -- the li-- mitati-- ons i-- nvolv-- ed in setting it up, this is acceptable; (2) the positive controls we"re0c0ho0se2n 25
anictcroorfdliunogretnoe tahendstr2a-ianntahnrdamacitnievaftoironthceonpdliattieonisncaonrdpoirnactliuodnedasssoayd;iu1m,1a-ziddiec,hl9o-raomeitnhoyalcerneidifnore,th2e-
dneesgiactciavteocronatsrsoalygwriotuhp Tf-or22al4l7asCsoayCs waansd w1a,te2r,.3,(43-)diTehpeoxpylbautteainnecofroprortahteioS.n acsesraeyviwsiitahe baostsahy.ageTnhtes
adensdictchaetyoeraasstsaasy,sapylawtietshwTe-r2e24pr8ewpearreedraespefaotredt;hetshetadnedsaircdcaatsosraaysbsuaty nwoasterstunchoenmliycoanlcew.a(s4)adFdoerdtthoe
the agar. The strains tested were S. typhimurium TA98 and TA 100. The test was performed both
wshietlhfainndaw9i-tlhitoeurtdmeesticacbaotloirc. aActikvnaotiwonn.vPollautemsewoifthTo-u2t24li7dswwaesreadpdleadcetdosaidgelabsys sPiedreiindiashpetrhfaotrawtaesd
p0.l5acmeld ainndth0e.1cemn1teorfotfeastncdheamtitcacahlewde1r0ethaeddbeodtttoomthoefdtehseicschaetlofr..ITnhdeecnreegaastiinvgeocrodnetrr,ol5.c0hemmii,ca1.l0wmals,
water; the positive control chemical was 1,1-dichloroethylene. Both were treated in the same manner
aats3T7-22C4.7.A Tmahgendeetsiicccstaitrorrerwwaisthsevaalneedsawnadsppllaacceeddoinn 2thmeabganseetoifceasctihrredrepsliactceationratrooeonsmurmeaiandetqauianteed:
dispersion ofthe chemical. Plates were incubated for 8 hours, removed from the desiccators, their
lids replaced and they were incubated at 37C counted.
for an additional 42 hours before revertants were
RESULTS
Overall results: positive, negative, ambiguous: All tests were negative,
Genotoxic effects (unconfirmed, dose-response, equi--vwitoh/cwitaholut activation): Negative both with and without activation.
Cytotoxic concentration: T-2247 was not cytotoxic,
In the other
plate incorporation assay, T-2248 was toxic strains at 5000 ug/plate when tested without
to strain TA1538 activation. It was
at 1000 toxic at
pg/plate and to all 1000 pg/plate to
sTt-r2a2in48TAwLaSs3s7liaghntdlyatto5x0i0c0tougS./pclearteevfiosriaaellDo3thaetr5st%racionnscwehnternattieosntewdiwtihtohutmemteatbaobloilcicacatcitviavtaitoino.n.
Statistical results: No statistical results were determined.
Remarks: In the first assay with T-2248 and S. cerevisiae D3 without metabolic activation there. saseseamyewdatso rbeepesaotmeed satlig1h%t,i2nd%i,ca4t%i,onaonfdm5ut%agceonnicceinttyraattiothnes hwiigthhesatndcownictehnoturtataicotnivtaetsitoend., T5h%e.reThe wdiadsnnoot cianduisceatrieocnomobfianamtuitoangeinniSc.dcoesreevriesisapeonDs3e. aTnhdetrheewteersetinngoltaebsotr-sapteocriyficconccolnufdoeudndtihnatgTf-ac2t2o4r8s in any aspectofthe test.
CONCLUSIONS TtyhpehtiemsutirnigumlaTboAr1a5t3or5y,cToAn1c0lu0d,eTdAtIhaSt3T7-,2T2A4I7Sa3n8d,Ta-n2d2T48A9w8erwehneonnmtuesttaegdeinnica pfloart.e incorporation assay with and without metabolic activation; that T2247 did not induce mutation in S.
ref niasssmensReport Append
va
000226
typhimurium TA98 and TA100 when tested neither chemical induced recombination in S.
in a dessicator assay cerevisiae D3.
for
volatile
chemical
and
that
`These conclusions are accurate.
REFERENCE CSiOmMmoPnA,NVY.F.CO19M78P.OIUNNVDISTRTO-2M2I47CRCoOCBIAONLDOGTI-2C2A4L8 MCoUCT.ASGREINIIntCerInTatYioAnaSl,SFAiYnaSl OReFpor3tM. Prepared for 3M Company, St. Paul, Minnesota 55101
OTHER None
Dr ilAssssment Report Append
vas
ona?
ROBUST SUMMARY - RS15
`MTiUtlTe:ATSIAOLNMOANSESLALYAW~IETSHCHPEFROIS,CH1I9A99COLIMAMMALIAN-MICROSOME REVERSE
TEST SUBSTANCE
Identity: PFOS; CAS #2795-39-3; FC-95; potassium perfluorooctylsulfonate, T-6295 Remarks: Lot 217; White crystalline powder; Stored at room temperature
METHOD
Method/Guideline 1983
followed:
Ames
ct
al.,
1975;
Green
and
Muriel,
1976;
Maron
and
Ames,
Test type: Reverse mutation
`Test system: Bacterial
GLP: Y
Year study performed: 1999
Species/Strain/cell-type/cell line: Salmonella typhimurium TA1535, TA100, TA9S, TA1S37 Escherichia coli WP2urA
Metabolic rats
activation:
0.1
ml
89
liver
homogenate
from
Aroclor
1254
induced
Sprague-Dawley
Cngopnlcaetnet,ra3t,i3o30nsigt/epsltaetde:,Sa.ntdyp5h,i0m0u0rgi/upml:at3e3.u3g/ppgl/aptleatwei,th10a0ctpigv/aptliaotnea,n3d330.p3g3/3plpagtpel,a1t,e0,001.00 nHgg//ppllaattee,a3n.d335,u0g0/p0lautge/,pl1a0t.e0wuigt/hpoluattea,ct3i3v.a3tipong./plate plate, 100 pg/plate, 3333 pg/plate, 1,000
E. coli: 33.3 ug/plate, ng/plate both with and
100 ug/plate, 3333 without activation.
pg/plate,
1,000
pg/plate,
3,330
pg/plate,
and
5,000
Statistical methods used: None
Rcoenmcaenrtkrsa:tiTohnearnedwceornetrnolo;stihgenipfoisciatnitvpercootnotcroollsdewveirateiosntrsa.in(1)aTnhdearcteivwaetrioen3coplnadtietsiopnerspteecstific and
niintcrlouqdueidnobleinnzeo-[Na-]opxyirdeen.e,Th2e-nviterhoifcllueorceonnet,ro2l-wamaisnoDaMnSthOr;ace(2n)e,thseosdoiluvemnatziwdaes, DICMRS-O19;1(a3)ndth4e-
aasnsdayWPw2ausvnroAt,retpheearteehd.ad(4t)oFboeratthleetaessattar2t-ifcolledtionbcerecaosnesiindetrheedmpeoasnitirveeveirntasnttrsaipnesrTpAl9at8e,oTveAr1t0h0at
ofthe appropriate vehicle control. The increase had to be accompanied by a dose response to
Dra itlsesRepsort Append V
vas
COOnC8
ain3c-rfeoalsdinignccroenacseentirnatthieonmseoafnthreevteersttanatrtsicpleer. pFloartesotrvaeirnsthTaAto1fSt3h5eaanpdprToAprIiSa3te7vtehheircelheacdonbteroalt. lTehaset
increase article.
had
to
be
accompanied
by
a
dose
response
to
increasing
concentrationsof
the
test
RESULTS
Overall results: positive, negative, ambiguous: Negative
Genotoxic effects `was not genotoxic
(wuhnecnontefsitremdeedi,thdeorswei-trhesoprownisteh,ouetqumievtoacbaolli--cwaicttihv/awtiiotnh.out activation):
PFOS
`CThyitsotcoyxtiotcoxciocnicteyntwraastieovni:deCnycteodtboxyicaitsyliwghatsrneodtuectdiaotn5i0n0t0heugb/apclteartiealwiltahwon.ut metabolic activation.
Statistical results: Results were not evaluated statistically.
tRheemraarnkgse:ofTthheerevewheircelencoonttersotl-ss.pecific confounding factors. Mutation frequencies were within
CONCLUSIONS Author's conclusions are that PFOS is negative in this assay. This is accurate.
REFERENCE
AMsecscahyiw,iMt.hSP.FO19S9.9.CoSvalamnocneelLlabao-raEtsocrhieersiIcnhci.a(CCoolvian/cMea)mmVaileinnaan,-MViircgrionsioam2e2R1e8v2eFrisnealMuRteaptoirotn
Covance Study 55144-1000
No.:
20784-0409.
Submitted
to:
3M
Corporate
Toxicology
St.
Paul,
Minnesota
OTHER None
[Lp -- ---- te ------ec
vas
000229
ROBUST SUMMARY - RS16
`Title: SALMONELLA TYPHIMURIUM SPOT TEST ON FC-95, 1977 TEST SUBSTANCE
Identity: FC-95 (CAS #2795-39-3; potassium perfluorooctylsulfonate, T-6295, PFOS) Remarks:
METHOD
Method/Guideline followed: Spot test
Test type: Reverse mutation
Test system: Bacterial
GLP:N
Year study performed: 1977
Species/Strain/cell-type/cell line: Salmonella typhimurium TA1535, TASS, TA100 Metabolic activation: Aroclor 1254 rat liver $-9
Concentrations tested: 10 meg
Statistical methods used: None.
cReenmtaerrkofs:plaPtaepsoefrSd.isctsypsahtiumruarteidumwictihthtehreweiqtuhivoralweintthoofut10ramt eligveorfSF-9C.-9T5hewesorlevepnltacweadsinDtMhSeO. `Twhaes ppoossiittiivvee cinontthriosltewsta.sN2o-armeipneoaftlsuwoerreenepeartf1o0rmmede.g aAndpo1simteigv.e r2e-spAoFnsreeqiusijreusdgaectdivbaytitohne and formationof a ringofmutant colonies around the disc with the test agent RESULTS
Overall results: positive, negative, ambiguous: Cannot bejudged. UGnecnoontfoixrimceedffbeecctsau(suenocfotnefsitramnedd,redpoosret-irnegscpoonndsiet,ioenqsu.ivocal -- with/without activation):
Cagyetnottodxififcusceosncienntotrtahteiaogna:rCfornocmentthreatdiisocnsancdancnaontnobte
judged from the be quantitated.
spot
test
because
the
test
Statistical results: None [-------- --
var oenzio
aRequmaalritkast:iveThiendsipcoattotresotfimsurteaggaerndiecditays,hniegghaltyiviensreenssuilttisvemuasntdbwehicloenfpiosrimteidveinreasuplltastemay serve as incorporation assay. CONCLUSIONS iTnhfiosrimsaatioonnep-rpeasgeentmeedmtooerveaplourat.teInthaeddreistuilotns.to being an insensitive assay, there is insufficient REFERENCE LRaobholrfaitnogr,iSe.sR.Inc1.97I7n.teSroaflfmicoenCeolrlryeMsapmomnadleincaen-tMo iAc.rNo.sWoemleteMru,taEgnevniircointmyenTtesatlinEgn.gi3nMcerRiinkger& Control. OTHER None
Lr ----
vas
oon2a1
ROBUST SUMMARY - RS17
Title: BACTERIAL REVERSE MUTATION TEST OF 9-1, 1996 TEST SUBSTANCE
I(dCe=n0t-i2t)y:ey5c-l1o;heRxeyalcstuilofnopnryo!dfulcutoorfidpe,erpfoltuaosrsoiduimmectahrybloyncaltoeheaxnydlssuullffuorniyc]acfildu;orCidAe,Sp#er6f7l5u8o4r-o4a2lk-y3l [the main component A(n=2)]
Remarks: Lot 293, White powder, MW ~500, 100% wiw% pure, Stored at room temperature METHOD
Method/Guideline September 1, 1988
followed:
Standards
for Toxicity
Investigations
(Japan's
MOL,
No.
77,
Test type: Reverse mutation
Test system: Bacterial
GLP: Y
Year study performed: 1996
Species/Strain'cell-type/cell TAIS37
line:
Salmonella
typhimurium
TA100,
TA98,
TALS35
and
Escherichia coli WP2uwrA
Metabolic activation: 5.6-benzoflavone
S9
homogenate
from
male
SD
male
rats
pretreated
with
phenobarbital
and
Concentrations tested: For S. typhimurium TA100, TA1S35, TAIS37 and E. coli WP2urA. wngi/tphloautte.activation: 39.1 ug/plate, 78.1ug/plate, 156pg/plate, 313 pg/plate, 625pg/plate, and1250 For S. typhimurium TA98 without activation and for all strains with activation56] g/plate,
315 uglplate, 625 pg/plate, 1250 pg/plate, 2500 pg/plate, and S000 pg/plate.
Statistical methods used: None
cRoenmtraorlkwsa:sTtheesrteedwienrdeupnloicsaitgen;iftihceanntepgraottiovceoclodnetvrioaltiwoanss.te(s1t)edEaicnhtrtiepslticcaotnec;e(n2t)rathteiosnolavnedntpoasnidtive
nacetgiavtaitvieoncosnytsrtoelmwaansdDiMncSlOud;ed(:3)2t-hAeF;possoitdiivuemcoanztirdoel,sIwCeRr-e19c1h,osaennd a2c-caomridnionagntthorsatcreainne;an(d4) the
tceosltowniaessnwoatsrtewpeiacteedo;r m(5o)rTehtehetensetgsautbisvteacnocnetrwoals, jthuedrgeewdatso apodsoisteiv-erewshpeonnstehreenlatiuonsmhoipfbraenvdeertthraent
orefsulntsiawesrerreeproRdepuocritblAep.penis
vay
conzaz
RESULTS Overall results: positive, negative, ambiguous: Negative NGeegnaottiovxeiwcietfhfeacntds (wiutnhcoountfiarctmievda,tidoonse-response, equivocal -- with/without activation): CcoyltioWtoPx2icucvornAceanntdra5t0i0o0n:pg1/0pl0a0teugw/iptlhatSc. itnySp.htiympuhriimuumrTiAum98TAw1i0t0ho,uTtAaLctSi3vaSt,ioTn.A15S03070,uagn/dplEa.te with S. typhimurium TA100, TAIS35, TA1537, and E. coli WP2 uvrA with activation. Statistical results: Statistics were not used to evaluate the results. tReestmeadr.kTsh:eTphoesirteivweacsonntoroilnscrgeaavsee tinhetheexpneucmtbederroefsproenvsee.rtaNnetgsawtiitvhe aconnytrsotlrasiwnearteanwyitchoinncetnhteration historical range for the assay. CONCLUSIONS The authors conclude that the test substance is negative in this assay. This is correct, REFERENCE OBiAtaCT87E7RJIaApaLn,REFiVnaElRRSepEorMt.UTFoArTSIuOmNitToEmoST3MOFLi9m-i1.ted1,99K6a.nHaigtaawRae,s2ea2r9cJhaLpaabnoratories, Hita,
OTHER Nothing
rat ilAssent Ror Append
Vso
000293
ROBUST SUMMARY - RS18
Title: MUTAGENICITY EVALUATION OF T-2014 CoC IN THE AMES SALMONELLA/MICROSOME PLATE TEST, 1978
TEST SUBSTANCE
Identity: T-2014 CoC, CAS #2795-39-3, potassium perfluorooctylsulfonate FC-95, PFOS
Remarks: White Powder
METHOD
Method/Guideline followed: Ames, 1975
Test type: Reverse mutation
Test system: Bacteria; Yeast
GLP: N
Year study performed: 1977/1978
Species/Strain/cell-type/cell line: Salmonella typhimurium TA100, TA1535, TAIS37, TAIS38, `TA09, Saccharomyces cerevisiae D4
Metabolic activation: 0.1 + 05 ml S9 homogenateofAroclor 1254 induced Sprague Dawley rat liver
Concentrations tested: 0.1ug/plate, 1.0 pg/plate, 10.0 pg/plate, 100 pg/plate, 500 pg/plate nonactivated; 0.1 ugplate, 1.0 pg/plate, 10.0 ug/plate, 100 pg/plate, 500 pg/plate activated
Statistical methods used: None
Remarks: There were no significant protocol variations. (1) For the time when the test was done
(1977) a single plate per concentration was routine. (2) the negative control was the solvent DMSO;
the positive controls were chosen according to strain being tested and activation condition and
included ethyl methanesulfonate, quinacrine mustard, nitroflourene, 2-anthramine; and
dimethylnitrosamine. (3) a limited repeat study was done with strain TA100 both with and without
activation because the testing laboratory believed that there was some evidenceofmutagenicity with
this strain. The doses tested without activation were 100 pg/plate, 500 ug/plate, and 1000 ug/plate
and 500 ug/plate, 1000 pg/platc, and 2000 wg/plate with activation. However,a reviewof the data
shows that was originally thought to be mutagenicity was within the normal variationof the assay.
`The repeat was inadequate because the doses tested were too high and to toxic to shed any light on
possible mutagenic activity; there were no signs ofmutagenicity in anyofthe other strains tested.
"The test with Saccharomyces was also negative. (4) criteria to evaluate results were as follows: dose-
rat nial sess Report Appi
vai
oeo244
response over 3 concentrations with lowest increase equal to 3X the solvent control for TALS3S, TAI537 and TALS38. Dose-response over 3 concentrations with lowest increase equal to 3X background for TA100 and 2x-3X background for TA98 and D4.
RESULTS Overall results: positive, negative, ambiguous: Negative Genotoxic effects (unconfirmed, dose-response, equivocal -- with/without activation): Negative with and without activation Cytotoxic concentration: 1000 ug/ml both with and without activation. Statistical results: No statistics performed. Remarks: None CONCLUSIONS Author's conclusions are accurate but for wrong reasons. The test chemical is negative not because it was negative on repeat testing but because what was taken as mutagenicity in the first test was within normal variationofthe assay.
REFERENCE Litton Bionetics, Inc. Kensington, Maryland 20795 1978. Mutagenicity Evaluation of T-2014 CoC in the Ames Salmonella/Microsome Plate Test. Final Report. Submitted to: 3M Company, Saint Paul, Minnesota 55101 OTHER None
raf niaAssos Report Appecic
v2
000295
ROBUST SUMMARY - RS19
`Title: MUTAGENICITY TEST ON T-6295 IN AN IN VIVO MOUSE MICRONUCLEUS ASSAY, 1996 TEST SUBSTANCE Identity: T-6295, CAS #2795-39-3, potassium perfluorooctylsulfonate, FC-95, PFOS Remarks: Off-white mixture of powder and flakes METHOD Method/Guideline followed: Heddle, 1983 Test type: Micronucleus GLP: Y Year study performed: 1996
Species/Strain: Mouse; Crl:CD-1(ICR)BR
Sex: Males & Females No. animals/sex/dose: 5/sex/dose Vehicle (if used): Deionized water Route of administration: Oral Doses: 237.5 mg/kg, 450 mg/kg, 950 mg/kg, Frequency of treatment: Single dose Statistical methods used: Analysis of variance; Dunnet's t-test Remarks: There were no significant protocol deviations. (1) Animals were 9 weeks and 1 day old at startofdosing males; weight range for the males was 29.9 ~37.0 g; for females it was 23.129.2 g; (2) the vehicle was deionized water; (3) the test lasted 72 hours; (4) the test material was a(6d)mitnhiesvteehriecdleascoantsrionlglweaosralH,d0o;set;he(5p)oasliltitvreeactomnetnrtolgwroausps80wemrge/ksgamcpylceldopatho2s4,ph4a8miadned d7i2sshooluvresd; in water and administered by gavage. Controls were sampled at 24 hours only. Control groups consisted of5 males and 5 females cach. (7) No clinical examinations were made. (8) No necropsics or other gross examinations were made on these animals. (9) Micronuclei were evaluated in the bone marrowoftreated animals. Frequency of PCE vs. NCEs was determined Dbry sncoirinAgstsheenntuRmepboretropfePiCEV and NCES in the optic fields while scoring the first 100v0r
onN296
erythrocytes. A positive was judged by an increase in micronucleated polychromatic erythrocytes.
over levels observed in the vehicle controls in either sex or at any harvest time. Bone marrow
toxicity was judged by a significant reduction in PCE/NCE ratios in cither sex at any harvest time. (10) The M.T.D. was chosen on the basis o2f preliminary dose sclection assays both of `which showed significant toxicity at the highest dose tested.
RESULTS
Effect on mitotic index or PCE/NCE ratio by dose level and sex: PCE:NCE Ratio 237.5 mg/kg
24 hours: males 0.57 + 0.11; females 0.52 + 0.10 48 hours: males 0.48 + 0.04; females 0.80 0.10 72 hours: males 0.39 + 0.11; females 0.42 + 0.14 450 mg/kg 24 hours: males 0.75 + 0.11; females0.59 + 0.08 48 hours: males 0.71 + 0.05; females 0.37 + 0.07 72 hours: males0.29 + 0.06; females 0.40 = 0.12 950 mg/kg 24 hours: males 0.56 + 0.13; females 0.59 + 0.08 48 hours: males 0.54 + 0.08; females 0.44 + 0.11 72 hours: males 0.17 + 0.05; females 0.17 0.05
Genotoxic effects (unconfirmed, dose-response, equivocal): Negative
Statistical results:
`The PCE:NCE ratio was reduced in 237.5 mg/kg males at 48 and 72 hours; in 450 mg/kg males at 72 hours and in 450 mg/kg females at 48 hours and in 950 mg/kg males at 48 and 72 hours and in 950 mg/kg females at 72 hours. There was no statistically significant increase in the number of micronucleated PCE over the controls in any treatment group. The positive control induced a significant increase in the number of mPCE in both males and females and reduced the PCE:NCE ratio in females only at 24 hours.
Remarks:
(1) Animals were examined approximately 1-2 hours before sampling for signsof toxicity and
`mortality. Animals in the 237.5 mg/kg group remained healthy throughout the treatmentperiod.
(2) Both males and females in the 950 mg/kg dose group began dying about 22 hours after
treatment. Also at 22 hours 2 males in the 950 mg/kg dose group went into convulsions when their cage was opened but recovered in a few minutes. At about 46 hours after treatment 1 female
from the 450 mg/kg dose group and more males and females from the 950 mg/kg dose group were found dead and at about 71 hours after treatment, one male from the 950 mg/kg dose group was found dead. All surviving animals appeared normal at that point. (3) No other clinical signs were noted or reported. (4) Body weight changes were not reported. (5) Food and water
OttdosntsmnSpnur pec
vaycoozay
consumption were not reported. (6) There was no increase in the percentofmicronucleated PCEs at any dose level tested or at any time period sampled.
CONCLUSIONS: The author concludes that PFOS is negative in the mouse bonemarrow micronucleus assay. This is an accurate assessment.
REFERENCE:
Murli, H. 1996. Mutagenicity Test on T-6295 in an In Vivo Mouse Micronucleus Assay. Coming
Hazelton Inc. (CHV), Vienna, Virginia 22182. Final Report. Submitted to 3M St. Paul, Minnesota 55144-1000
CHV Study No.:
17403-0-455.
OTHER: None
------
vas
0N02eg
ROBUST SUMMARY - RS20
Title: Unscheduled DNA Synthesis in Rat Liver Primary Cell Cultures with PFOS, 1999
TEST SUBSTANCE
Identity: PFOS; CAS #2795-39-3; potassium perfluorooctylsulfonate; T-6295
Remarks: Lot 217, White crystalline powder; Stored at ambient temperature
METHOD
Method/Guideline followed: Williams, 1977; Williams, 1980; Butterworth et al., 1987
Test type: Unscheduled DNA Synthesis in Mammalian Cells in Culture
`Test system: Primary cells in culture:
GLP: Y
Year study performed: 1999
Species/Strain/cell-type/cell line: Primary hepatocytes from a Fischer 344 rat male rat.
Metabolic activation: None
C1.o0ncpegn/tmlr,at2i.o5nusg/temslt,edS:p1g5/mclo,nc1e0n.t0raptgi/omnls abnedtw2e5e.n00p./02m5,igc/homsleanndfor40e0va0luga/tmilon.bSaisx,ed0.u5popgn/ml, cytotoxicity.
Statistical methods used: None
Rweermeariknscu:baTtheedrefowre1r9e.6n-o20s.i0gnhiofiucsa,nttphreonttohceolasdseaviyatwiaosns.ter(m1)inTartiepdliacnatde'cHu-ltthuyremsidoinnecoavderdseldiptso the
cmuolutnurteesdfoonr 3sl0idmeisn,udtiepspaefdteirnwehmiuclhsitohne acenldlsstwoerreed ffioxred6,ddaryisedatov2-e8rnCighatf,tecrowvehrisclhiptsheweermeulsions
mweeraendneevtelnuocpleeda,r fgirxaeidn acnodunsttadienetde.rm1i5n0edc.el(l2s)pTehredossoelvweentreforreatdhe(a5s0sfayrowmacsaDchMcSoOve;rs(l3i)p)thaenred wtahes
no follow-up repeat considered positive,
study; (4) the there must be
positive control was 2-AAF; (5) for an increase in the mean net nuclear
a treatment grain count
to to
be at
least
5
ogrfaniuncslpeierwintuhclfeiuvse aorbomvoertehenectongrcauirnrsenstucvhehtihcaltetchoenptreorlcevnatlaugee,oafntdh/eosreannuicnlcerieaisneteisnttchueltnuurmesbeisr
10% above the percentage of these criteria.
seen
in
the
vehicle
control
cultures.
The
positive
control
satisfied
both
RESULTS
Or itssmeRneposrt ppedic
vss
cooze9
Overall results: positive, negative, ambiguous: Negative
Genotoxic Negative
effects
(unconfirmed,
dose-response,
equi--vwitoh/cwitaholut
activation):
C25y.t0otpogx/imlc.coCnecllenmtorratpihoonl:ogEyxcweasssisvueitcaybtloetofxoircaintaylaytsiasnadtaabnodvebe5l0o.w0 2u5g./0mlg;/wme.ak cytotoxicity at Statistical results: The results were not evaluated statistically.
Remarks: There were no test-specific confounding factors
CONCLUSIONS The author concludes that PFOS is negative in this assay. This is accurate. REFERENCE CCiofvoannecMe.LAa.bor1a99t9o.riUesnsIcnch.edVuileendnaD,NVAAS2y2n1t8he2sFiisnainl RRaetpoLritv.eCroPvrainmcaerySCteuldlyCNuol.t:ur2e0s78w0it-h04P4F7O.S. `Submitted to 3M Corporate Toxicology St. Paul, MN 55144-1000 OTHER None
--------
var
0Co250
ROBUST SUMMARY - RS21
Title: CHROMOSOMAL ABERRATIONS IN HUMAN WHOLE BLOOD LYMPHOCYTES WITH PFOS, 1999
TEST SUBSTANCE
Identity: PFOS; FC-95; CAS #2795-39-3; potassium perfluorooctylsulfonate; T-6295
Remarks: Lot #217, White crystalline powder, stored at room temperature
METHOD
Method/Guideline followed: Galloway, 1994
Test type: In vitro cytogenetics Test system: Human cells in culture
GLP: Y
Year study performed: 1999
`Species/Strain/cell-type/cell line: Human lymphocytes
Metabolic activation: Aroclor 1254 induced rat liver S9 homogenate, 15.0 uL/ml, plus NADP and isocitric acid.
Concentrations tested: 12.5 pg/ml, 24.9 pg/ml, 49.7 pg/ml, 99.3 ug/ml, 149 ug/ml, 199 pg/ml,
249 pg/ml, 299 pg/ml, 349 ug/ml, 449 pg/ml, 599 pg/ml without activation.
12.5 pg/ml, 24.9 pg/ml, 49.7 pg/ml, 99.3 ug/ml, 149 pg/ml, 199 pg/ml, 249 pg/ml, 349 ug/ml,
449 pg/ml with activation
Statistical methods used: Cochran-Armitage test for linear trend; Fisher's Exact Test Remarks: There were no significant protocol deviations. (1) Each concentration was tested in replicate; each replicate was considered an independent unit. The negative control for the nonactivation assay was DMSO at 10 pl/ml, which was the highest concentration used in the test cultures; in the activation assay it was DMSO plus the S9 mix; the positive control was mitomycin C for the nonactivation assay and cyclophosphamide for the activation assay. Three
`concentrationsof each positive control were tested. Cultures were exposed to chemical for 3 hours and harvested 22 hours later. One hundred metaphases from cach replicateofthe useable
treatment cultures and the solvent and one dose ofthe positive control were used; mitotic index
was evaluated by analysing the numberofmitotic cells in at least 1000 cells per culture; (2) the
solvent for the chemical was DMSO; (3) there was no follow up study done although in a study such as this where there are negative results after 3 hours incubation with a 22 hour harvest time
Dr AsmA et Append ovha ozE1 a second study with a continuous exposureof 22 hours for the nonactivated portionofthe assay
siisgrneifciocmamntenidncerde.as(e4)(pT<h0e.0t1e)stinartthieclne wuoumldobfhaceveelrlbseweintchocnhsirdoemroesdopmoaslitaibveeirrfataitohnesreathoandeboerenmoare ocobnsceernvteradtiinontsh.e nThuembteesrtoafrcteicllleswwaisthcocnhsriodmeoresdomnaeglaatbievrerabteicoanusseattahneryecwoancsenntorastiignoinfitceastnetdi.ncrease RESULTS
Overall results: positive, negative, ambiguous: Negative NGeegnaottiovxeicboetfhfewcittsh(aunndcowniftihromuteda,ctdivoastei-onr.esponse, equivocal -- with/without activation): aCcyttiovtaotxioincwceornecetnhterafitristonc:yto2t9o9xipcgc/omnlcewnittrhaotuitonmsettaesbtoeldicasaectviivdaetnicoendanbdy a19r9eduugc/tmilonwiinthmitotic index.
Statistical results: Negative
cRuelmtuarreksst:reMaitetdotwiicthin1d2e.x5wuags/mrle,du2c4e.d9 u3g8/%m,l,84%9.175%p,g/1m5l%,,991.23%u,g/1m9l%,,12449%,ug6/m9l%, 2an4d9 9ug2/%mli,n
299 pg/ml, 149 cultures treated
pg/ml and 199 ig/ml,
449 249
ug/ml pg/ml,
without activation. Aberrations 299 pg/ml, and 349 pg/ml,
were
analysed
from
t`rWeiatthemdewtiatbhol4i9c.7acutgi/vamtli,on1,99mituogt/imcl,in2d4e9x gw/amslr,edauncded29b9yu1g2/m%l,. 4A1b%e,rr7a1t%io,nsanwder5e3%anailnycsueldtufrreosm `cumlettuarpehsasterseawteedrewiatvhai9l9a.b3legf/omrla,na1ly4s9ispgf/rmolm, c1u9l9tuprge/smtlr,eaatnedd w2i9t9hu2g9/9mlg./Omnl,ly 27 and 4
CONCLUSIONS: lymphocytes; this
Author's conclusions is correct as stated.
are
that
PFOS
does
ot
cause
mutation
in
human
REFERENCE: Murli, H. Lymphocytes with PFOS.
1999. Chromosomal Aberrations in Human Covance Laboratories Inc. (Covance) Final
Whole Blood Report. Covance
Study
No.: 20784-0-449. Submitted to: 3M Corporate Toxicology, St. Paul Minnesota 55144-1000.
OTHER: None
--------
vs
000252
ROBUST SUMMARY - RS22
T(iwtilteh:inEdveapleuantdieonntorfeptehaet)m,u1t9a9g4e.nic activity of T-5874 in the Ames Salmonella/microsome test
TEST SUBSTANCE
Identity: N-Methy! perfluorooctanesulfonamido ethanol (N-McFOSE) Remarks: Cream solid; Identification T-5874, batch 2334, purity "100%" METHOD
Method/guideline: OECD Guideline No. 471
Test type: Salmonella- mammalian microsome reverse mutation assay GLP: Yes (OECD)
Year: 1994
Species/Strains Salmonella typhimuriumTA-1535, TA-1537, TA-98, TA-100. Metabolic activation: $9 from Aroclor-induced rat liver. Statistical methods: None
REMARKS
Study Design:
Concentration (with and without $9): 100, 333, 1000, 3330, 5000 pg/plate with all strains, plus 3,10,33 ugplatefor TAL00.
Number of replicates: Two
Plates/test: Three per dose.
Pmorlotceenduargea:r sAulpipqlueomtesnotfed10w0ituhlobfiocteilnlsaonfd aeatcrhacsetorfaihnisftriodminoeve(fronrigShatlmcounletulrleas)woerrweitmhixed with tturbyep,toapnhdanpo(ufroredE.ovCoelri)t.he Asunrfaapcperoofprsiealteectqiuvaentaigtayropflatteesst.maFtoerriaaclti(vinatDioMnSaOss)ayws,as0.a5dmdledoftoSe9ach mix was addedbeforemixing and pouring. Salmonella plates were incubated for 48 hours at 37C and scored for numbersofrevertants. Yeast D4 plates were incubated at 30C (nonactivation) or 37C (with $9) for 3-5 days and scored for convertants. Solvent: DMSO (100 plate)
Positive controls: Nonactivation: Sodium azide, | pg/plate for TA-1535; rat nilsessment Report Append
ven
000253
methylmethanesulfonate, 650 ug/plate for TA-100; 9-aminoacridine, 60 pg/plate for TA-1537;
daunomycine TA-1537, and
4 pg/platc for TA-98. Activation: 2-aminoanthracene, 0.5 g/plate for TA-98 and TA-100.
$
g/plate
for
TA-1535,
RESULTS
pCryetcoitpoitxaitciocnoonfcteensttramtaitoenri:alNaot ttowxoichiitgyhsesetendowsicts.h or without S9 in TA100 at any dose. Some
Genotoxic effects: No metabolic activation.
increase
in
mutants
seen
at
any
dose,
with
any
strain,
with
or
without
REMARKS
`Some precipitationoftest material at two highest doses.
CONCLUSIONS
N-MeFOSE was not mutagenic in the Ames assay.
REFERENCE
NSaOlTmoOnXell1a9/9m4i.crEovsaolmueattiesotno(wfitthheimnduetpaegnedneinctarcetpievaitt)y.ofNTO-T58O7X4 iPnrotjheectAm1e15s932; NOTOX Substance 38187
Dr iAsseRnpotr-Append V
val
.
000254
ROBUST SUMMARY - R23
Title: Evaluationof the ability of T-5874 to induce chromosome aberrations in cultured peripheral human lymphocytes (with independent repeat)., 1994
TEST SUBSTANCE
Identity: N-Methy! perfluorooctanesulfonamido ethanol (N-McFOSE)
Remarks: Cream solid; Identification T-5874, batch 2334, purity "100%"
METHOD
Method/guideline: OECD Guideline No. 473
Test type: Chromosomal aberrations in human whole blood lymphocytes
GLP: Yes (OECD)
Year: 1999
Species/Strain: Venous blood from healthy adult male humans.
Metabolic activation: S9 from Aroclor-induced rat liver (method ofAmes et al. 1975).
Statistical methods: Chi-square test
REMARKS FIELD FOR TEST CONDITIONS
Study Design:
wWehroeleinbcluoboadtecdulftourr2esdianysF1p0ricourlttouraeddmietdiionumo,f tseustppmlaetemreinatlewdiwtihthS99mmigx/mflorp3hhyotuorhse,maogrewliutthionuitn 89 for 24 or 48 hours. Fresh medium was added and the cells incubated with S9 for an additional 20-22 or 44-46 hours, with 0.5 ug/ml Colcemid added during the last three hours prior (t3o:h1)a.rveSslti.deCsewlelsreweprreepcaernetdr,ifaiurgeddr,ietdr,eaatnedd swtiatihnehdypwoittohni5c%KGCiIemasnda fsioxleudtiionnmfeotrhaannaolly:siasceotfic acid mitotic index and chromosome aberrations. A pilot study with concentrationsof3, 10, 33, 100, `and 333 ug/ml was used 10 set the concentrations for the aberration test
Concentration: -S9: 10, 33, 56, 100, 178, & 333 pg/ml (24hr exposure); 33, 100, 178, & 333
ng/ml (48 exposure)
hour used
exposure); for scoring
Only 56, 100 chromosome
and 178 g/ml aberrations.
(24
hr
exposure)
and
178
ig/ml
(48
hour
+89: 10,33, 100, & 333 ug/ml (24 hr & 48 hr exposure); 33, 100, and 333 pg/ml (24 hr exposure) and 100 & 333 g/ml (48 hour exposure) used for scoring chromosome aberrations. (Repeat trial used doses for 24-hour exposure only, and scored slides at 33, 100, & 178 pg/ml 59,and 33, 100, & 333 pg/ml +59.
------
va
0002TS
Number of replicates: Two
Cultures/test: Two.
Solvent: DMSO (0.9%)
Positive controls: Nonactivation: Mitomycin C, 0.2 ug/ml in HBSS for 24-hour treatment; ,0.1 ng/ml in HBSS for 48-hour treatment. Activation: cyclophosphamide, 15 jig/ml in HBSS. RESULTS
Cytotoxic concentration: Some reduction in mitotic index compared to control seen at 178 and 333 pg/ml
Genotoxic activation.
effects:
No
increase
in
chromosome
aberrations
with
or
without
metabolic
REMARKS
CONCLUSIONS
N-McFOSE was negative for inducing chromosome aberrations. REFERENCE
cNuOltTurOedXpe1r9i9p4h.erEavlalhuuamtaionnolfymtphheocabyitleisty(owfitTh-5i8nd7e4pteondienndtucreepecaht)r.omNosOoTmOeXabePrrroajteicotn1s1i5n919; NOTOX Substance 38187
--------
vas 000256
ROBUST SUMMARY - R24
TMiuttlaet:ioEnvaTleusattiWointohftLh5e18M7uYtaMgoenuisceALcytimvpithyoomfaT-Ce5l8l7s4(iWnitahn IInndVeipternodMeantmmReapleiaat)n,C1al9l94Gene TEST SUBSTANCE
Identity: N-Methyl perfluorooctanesulfonamido ethanol (N-McFOSE) Remarks: Cream solid; purity "97%"; Identification: T-5874 batch 2334, METHOD
Method/guideline: L133 & [248
OECD
Guideline
476;
EEC
Directive
67/S48/EEC,
EEC
Publication
No.
Test type: Reverse mutation assay
Test System: Mammalian cel line
GLP: Yes (OECD).
Year study performed: 1994
Species/Strain: LS187Y mouse lymphoma cells. Metabolic activation: S9 from Aroclor-induced adult male Wistar ratliveradded at 20% v/v. Statistical methods: None
Remarks:
Study Design:
CEoxnpceernitmreantti1on&: 2R:an1g0e,f3i3nd1i0n0gatnesdt:331,33p.3g,/m1l0,w3i3t,h 1a0n0d, waintdho3u3t3Sp9g./ml with and without $9; Number of replicates: 2
Plates/test: Three P90 plates/concentration plates/concentration for mutation frequency
for cloning efficiency (~150000 cells/plate).
(200
cells/plate);
ten
P90
Solvent: Dimethylsulfoxide (final concentration in culture medium, 0.8%).
Pwoistihtoiuvteccaolnctiruomlsa:ndWimtahgonuets$i9u:m)e;thwyiltmhet9h:anedsiumleftohnyaltneit(r2omsaMminien (H0a.n5k'msMbailnanHcaendk'ssalbtasloalnuctieodn,salt
solution, without calcium and magnesium).
RESULTS
Cefyftioctioexnciycwcaosncseenetnraattitohne:hIinghrearngceofnicnednitnrgattieostnss(otmeset rmeadtuercitailonpriencciepliltagtreodwatthhaingdhecsltoning concentration
Genotoxic effects: No consistent evidence of genotoxicity seen with or without $9
[--------
vat
:
000257
|Cm `Concentration | ColmCE at Day 0 |CoO[ee CE at Day 3(%)| Mutation Frequency
f[SoolemComal h[1e00
fTee
T{z33s
p fo sf h0 wpft Jh ee e s Ts; ] ]
[postiveContr BMS)[129
Jo
{159
|
f[Sm ooentConrol 100 y {ss airs
Ee C J e J e I
p[Posoitive Contol DMN)f[ee 30r [3 a Tog |
[fSF lovoemConrole [1e0s0 efa [ee[ s 5 s {s5 o ]
f 5 off e f as
[PositiveControl(BMS) [94
[or
{70
|
f[Sp f oolvenComal e [100e w Tos m pi 5 y e 3] ]
Cfpo olsoiveControl@MN)f [41 o om TaJ or a r f 3g sia] ]
CONCLUSIONS
N-MeFOSE was not mutagenic in the L5178Y mouse lymphoma gene mutation assay. REMARKS
`The protocol used for this study differed in several ways from normal practice. These
differences include: use ofrather high levelsof S9 mix (20%); use ofa positive control chemical
b(eEtMwSe)enfosrmtahlel-noann-dacltairvgaet-icoonloansysamyuttahanttsi;ndauncdesusfeeowfa"snmaulnlu-scuoallolnyy"lomnugtamnuttsa;ntnoexdpirfefesrseinotniapteiroinod
(3 days).
REFERENCE
an Ves NOTOX. 1994. Evaluation of the Mutagenic ActivityofT-5874 in an Jn Vitro Mammalian Cell
Gene Mutation Test With L5187Y Mouse Lymphoma Cells (With Independent Repeat).
000258
NOTOX Project 115921; NOTOX Substance 38187
On iitAssessment RepApopernd t
vi 000259
ROBUST SUMMARY - RS25
Title: 1993
MUTAGENICITY TEST ON T-5711
IN
AN IN VIVO RAT MICRONUCLEUS ASSAY,
TEST SUBSTANCE
Identity: N-Methyl perfluorooctanesulfonamido ethanol (N-MeFOSE)
Remarks: (T-5711).
ACrseeapmar-actoelodroecdumgeranntul(aMremmatoerfiralo;m pBu.rCi.tyCnooptlereypotrotRe.dD;. IdHeonwteiflilcsa,tiSoen:ptLe-m1b2e7r614,
1995,
KMeeyFtOoSFECaanldcoshmoalllTaomxoSuanmtpsle(s~)5%idoenrtilfeisess)otfhirselaast"ewdifdleuorraoncghee"miMccaFlsO,SpEa,rticcounltaarilnyisnhgor8t3e.r8c8h%aiNn-
(Cy, C5, Cy, C, C;, and C,) analogs.
METHOD
Method/guideline: FIFRA Guideline 84-2
Test type: In vivo rat micronucleus assay
GLP: Yes
Year study performed: 1993
Species/Strain: Charles River Sprague-Dawley rats.
Sex: Male and female
No. Animals: S/sex/dose
Route of administration: Oral gavage in 0.5% carboxymethyleellulose suspension.
Doses/concentration mike).
levels:
1250, 2500, and 5000 mg/kg in 0.5% carboxymethylcellulose (10
Frequencyoftreatment: Single dose; subgroups examined after 24, 48, and 72 hous. cSetlaltsiswtiitchalmmicertohnoudcsle:i,AnfaollylsoiwsedofbyvaTruikaenyc'esoSntsuqdueantriezreodotraanrgcesitneest-twriatnhsfaodrjmuesdtmperonptofrotriomnusltoifple comparisonsifsignificant.
RAneimmaarlkss:werAedurlatndraotmsi(zaepdpraonxdimwaetieglhyed wpreieokrstoolddo)siwnegr.eGqruoaurpasntoifne/dsefxo/rd7osdca/yhsarpvrieosrtttoismteudwye.re
ausserde,ppllaucsemaenntadsdfiotrioannailmSa/lssetxhtahtatdireedcperiivoerdttohecehlilghhardvoesste.oftFeisvet mcaolmepsoaunnddftiovebefeumsaelde,sirfenceeeidveidn,g
vweehriecleexaamndinpeodsiattiv2e4choonutrrosla(ftceyrcdloospihnog.sphAalmliadnei,m6a0lsmwge/rkegoibnssetrervielde diemimoendiizaetdelwyataefrt,er1d0omsli/nkgg)
and periodically throughout the study for signs oftoxicity. Tibial bone marrow was recovered at
rf niaAssReepnosAppend
var
000260
Gthreundewsailgdnastoelduthiaornvefsotlltoiwmeedabnyd Gsepirmesaad.onCsoldideeds,sfliidxeesd winermeetahnaanloylz,edanfdorsPtaCiEne/dNwCiEthraMtaioy-and 1,000 PCEperanimal were scored for micronuclei.
RESULTS
Toxicity: No significant bone marrow toxicity was seen, based on the PCE/NCE ratio.
dGoesneo.toTxhiecpeofsfietcitvse: cNoentgraotlivpero-d-uncoedintchreeaesxepeinctmeidcrsoingnuicfliecaatntedinpcorleyacsherionmamtiiccroenruyctlherioccyotmepsaarteadny
0 controls (2.24 0.64% v. 0.12 females).
0.05% in males and 2.22 0.33% v. 0.02
0.02% in
aRneimmaarlkssf:roTmox4i7cihtoyurinstahfetehridgohs-idnogsetogtrhoeupenwdaosftehviedesntcudeyd abnydablyantghueiddeaatphpseaorafancteootafl tohfefour
males and two females among the primary and secondary female was found dead at 47 hours after dosing.
high
dose
groups.
Also
one
mid-dose
CONCLUSIONS
N-MeFOSE alcohol erythrocytes.
was
negative
for
inducing
micronuclei
in
rat
bone
marrow
polychromatic
REFERENCE WMuarslhii,ngH.ton1,99V3i.enMnuat,aVgeAni2c2i1t8y2T.esFtinoanl TR-e5p7or1t1,iAnparinlJ3n0,Vi1v9o93R.atHMiWcAronSutculdeyuNsoA.ss1a5y5.15H-a0z-l4e5t4o,n
rat nialsss Report Appeic
vas
000263
ROBUST SUMMARY -RS26
DTiNtlAe:SGYENNTOHTEOSIXSICAINTDY CTEELSLT OPRNOTL-I5F71E1R.A1TIINOTNHAESISNAVYISVOI/NIRNAVTITLIRVOEURNCSECLHLSE,DU19L9E3D TEST SUBSTANCE
Identity: N-Methyl perfluorooctanesulfonamido ethanol (N-MeFOSE)
Rdoecmuamreknst:(CMreemaom-fcroolmorBe.dC.grCaonupllaerymtaoteRrDia.l;HIodweenltlifsi,caSteipont:emT-b5e7r111.4,1,19L9-51,27K6e.yAtoseFpCaraatlec:ohol sTmoaxllSaammpoluenst)si(de~n5t%ifioersltehsiss)oafsr"ewliadteedrafnlgueo"roMcheeFmOicSaEl,s,cpoanrttaiicnuilanrgly83s.ho8r8t%erNc-hMaienF(OC,S,ECa,ndCy, C,, C,, and C,) analogs.
METHOD
Method/guideline: Williams 1980, Mirsalis et al. 1982; Butterworth 1987 `Test type: In Vivolln Vitro Unscheduled DNA synthesis and cell proliferation in rat liver cells. `Test System: Primary cells from animals dosed in vivo
GLP: Yes
Year study performed: 1993
Species/Strain/cell (CRLCD BR).
type/cell
line:
Primary
hepatocytes
from
male
Sprague-Dawley
rat
Metabolic activation: NA
pSrtoaltiifsetriactailonmeatshsoayd:s:onFeo-rwUayDaSnaalsyssaiys:ofPvraorciedaunrceeoffoClalsowceidanboyaDnudnnGeaty'lsort-(te1s9t8(3r).anFkor cell transformationof data was performed ifvariances were hetcrogencous). REMARKS
Study Design:
UDS Assay:
m`aGtreoruipasl.oAf3ddriattiso/ndaolseg/rtoiumpespooifntthrreeceerievceediavesdintghleevoerhailcgleavoargpeosdiotsievoefcoonnteroolf.thTriemeepdooisnetssofwteerset2-
o3bhtoauirnsedabndy p1e5r-f1u6sihoonuorfsraafttelridveorsiinngsiwthuewnithhecpaaltcociyutmeasnwdermeaghnarevseistuemd.freHeeHpaatnokcsytbeaslawnecreed salts
Hcoenpteasinbiunfgfe0r.,5pmHM7.2e,thfyollelnoewgeldycboyl-5b0i-s1(0B0-aumniintose/tmhiyoleftchoelrl)a-gNenNa-sieetirnaaWcieltliicaamcsidMe(dEiGuTmA)Eand
(WME). Cells were cultured in WME with 10% fetal bovine serum (FBS) in culture dishes
containing plastic coverslips. After incubation for 2 hours at about 37C to allow attachment,
Dra tlAssRepeortnAppetnd V
ver
000262
turniattiattaecdhtehdycmeildlsinweer(4e7rCeim/omvmeodlea)n.d cAufltteurreamlaebdeiliunmg rpeeprliaocdeod fw4ithhouWsM,Ecelclosnwtearineirnegfe1d0uwCiit/hml
WME + 10% FBS containing 0.25 mM then swollen by addition of 1% sodium
thymidine citrate for
and 7-10
incubated for 18-19 minutes, ces were
hours. Nuclei fixed in acetic
were acid:
aetshsaensosled(1b:y3)c,oaunndtidnrgiend.uclFeiaxregdracionvserasnldipssuwblerraectpirnogctehseseadvefroargaeutnourmabdieorgrofagprhayi.nsUDinSnuwcalseus-
csiozveedrsalriepas(o3 fcocvyetrosplliapssm/.aniTmhale) nweetrneucmleeaasrugrreadinacnoduantvseroange5d0froarnedaocmhltyresaetlemcetnetdccoenldlistipoenr.
Doses: 250, 500, 1000 mg/kg
Number of replicates: One
Animals/dose: Three per timepoint (2 timepoints).
Solvent: Con oil (10 ml/kg)
Positive controls: Dimethylnitrosamine, 10 mg/kg. fCoerlhliPgrhoelsitfedroastieoannAdsspaoys:itiGvreocuopnstroofl)fiwveeryeoduonsgemdaalsefaodrutlhteCUrDlS:CaDsBsRayS7p2arhaoguures-bDeafwolreeysarcartisfi(c4e. sAutbcaubtoaunteotuheslsya(mdeortsiamlesu"rtfharecee)dwaiytshprainorAltzoestac2rMifLi1ce,o"stmhoetsiecapniummaplslwoeadreediwmiptlhan2tmedl of BrdU csoonlturtoilo)n w(e2r0emgr/emmlo)v.ed72anHdoufirxsedafitnerneduotsrianlg,bulfifveerreadndfoarmcarloisns.-sePcatriaofnofifn-deumobdeeddneudms(elcatbieolnisn(g5 pprme)pafrredo.m tCheelllepfrtollaitfeerarla,tiroinghwtamseddeitaenc,teadndimrmiughntohanitsetroicorhelmoibceaslalnydwfirtohmDdAuBodsetaniun.m wOenrce:e oapnpralolprthiraetee lsitvaeirnilnogboefs edxuaomdiennedu,mcsoeucnttiionnsg owfaslacboenlfeidrcmeeldl,s waands sptearifnoirngmewdausscionngftihremleedftaslasteirmaillar 8lobmei.crAotslceoapset 2fi0e0l0dsn(uscelleeictpeedraatnrimaanldowmerbeyecxoammpiunteerd)fpreormsaecmtiionn.imumof three sections, covering Doses: 625, 1250, 2500, 5000 mg/kg Numberofreplicates: One Animals/dose: Five.
Solvent: Corn oil (10 ml/kg)
Positive controls: Dimethylnitrosamine, 15 mg/kg.
RESULTS
Genotoxie Effects: any dose (see Table
No 1).
increase
in
net
nuclear
grains
o%r
cells
with
>
5
net
nuclear
grains
at
Cell Proliferation Effects: the two highest doses) was
A dose-related increase observed (see Table 2).
in
labeling
index
(statistically
suignificant
at
Remarks: There were no test-specific confounding factors raf nisss Report Appents
vo
000263"
Table 1
Control
me
0920.41
0.11020
Ulm
250 mg/kg
-0.15035
0.03035
500 mg/kg
023020 0610.58
-0170.15)
0.790.57
fem
0.170.15 0,890.01
-0.37:+ 0.48
0.520.05 0.91022
eC
Nea
4.00
1.34
Aon
007
ER
267
133
33
000
100
067
333
0.00
200
0.00
FE EEE EOL E 1000 mg/kg
0.36% 0.51
-0.580.36
2.00
0.00
006+023
0020.14
1.00
Loo
Positive Control | 17.98 2.06 03998524028664 9056373
0380607
(DMN 10mg/kg) | 0947.98
4054338
36.00
38.00
Table 2
|__Dose TT LabelingIndex(%) | LiverWeight(z) |TerminalBodyWeight(9) |
(DMN 15 mg/kg)
CONCLUSIONS
pNr-olMifeeFraOtiSoEn.alcohol was negative for inducing unscheduled DNA synthesis, but did cause cell
REFERENCE
Cifone, M.A. Synthesis and
1993. Genotoxicity Test Cell Proliferation Assay
On T-5711.1 in the in Rat Liver Cells.
In Vivo/In Vitro Unscheduled Hazleton Washington, Vienna
DNA. VA
22182. Final Report, September 14. HWA Study No. 15515-0-494 Submitted to 3M
`Corporation, St Paul, MN 55144-1000.
Dra tilAssam Bor Append V
var 000264
ROBUST SUMMARY- RS27
Title: DetectionofFluorochemicals in 35 Lotsof Commercial Sera, 1999
TEST SUBSTANCE
Identity: PFOS
Remarks:
METHOD
Study design: Cross-sectional data on PFOS detected in 35 lotsofindividual or pooled human sera samples from US chemical or biological supply companies.
Manufacturing/Processing/Use: N/A
Hypothesis tested: To determine the levels of PFOS in the serumofthe general population.
Study period: 1999
Setting: N/A
`Total population: 35 lotsofindividualorpooled human sera samples from US chemical or biological supply companies. No other information provided.
Subject selection criteria: Not provided in report.
Total# of subjects in study: Approximated--see "total population" above
Comparison population: N/A
Participation rate: N/A
Subject samples
description: were taken.
No
information
was
provided
on
the
individuals
from
whom
the
sera
Health effects studied: PFOS levels in blood
Data collection methods: Blood sera samples
Details on data collection: stored, analyzed, etc.
No information was provided as to how the blood was drawn,
Exposure period: Unknown. PFOS serum levels used as surrogate for exposure.
[----------
2 oozes
Description/delineationofexposure groups/eategories: N/A Measured or estimated exposure: N/A Exposure levels: N/A
Other methodological information:
RESULTS
Describe results: The mean PFOS serum level was 35 ppb, with a range of5 to 85 ppb.
Study strengths and weaknesses: These data are only preliminary cross-sectional data used to
determine PFOS levels in the general population--no other descriptive information about the
subjects was collected. The blood serum collected is from 2 small pool. Geographic regions
were not specified. Other demographic considered representativeofthe general
information was not available. populationofthe US.
Blood
donors cannot
be.
Research sponsors: 3M Environmental Lab
Consistencyof results: N/A
CONCLUSIONS NA
REFERENCE
Supplemental Notice on Sulfonate-based and Carboxylic-based fluorochemicals. Analyses of
blood sera samples from the general population. 37.
May 26, 1999.
3M Company.
SEHQ-0699-
OTHER
Dra itlsessReport Append
va
000266
ROBUST SUMMARY - R$28
Title: AnalysisofPooled Blood Samples from 3 European Blood Banks TEST SUBSTANCE
Identity: PFOS
Remarks:
METHOD
SintuthdryeedeEsuirgonp:eaCnrocsosu-ntsreicetsi:onBaelldgaituamo,nNPetFhOerSladentdescatendd
in pooled Germany.
serum
from
blood
banks
Manufacturing/Processing/Use: N/A
Hypothesis population.
tested:
To
determine
the presence
of
PFOS
in
the
serumofthe
general
Study period: 1998
Setting: N/A
TBoetlagliupmopbulloaotdiobna:nkSperrouvmidpeodol5epdoforleodm s3armepglieosna(l10bldooondorbsanpkesr sinamtphlree)e.EuTrhoepeNaenthceorulntarnidss. The,
sample pooled
provided 6 pooled samples (10 donors per sample). samples (30 donors per sample). Altogether, these
The Gremany blood ank proivded 16 pooled sampled represented 290
6
donors.
`Subject selection criteria: Telephone request. requested but permission was not granted.
Other European
country blood
banks
were
Total# of subjects in study: Approximated--see "total population" above Comparison population: N/A
Participation rate: 50% response
Subject description: No sera samples were taken.
information
was
provided
on
the
individuals
from
whom
the
.
Health effects studied: PFOS levels in blood
Data collection methods: Blood sera samples
Details on data collection: drawn, stored, etc.
No information was provided as to how the blood was
DraIntlsss por ppeic
vas 000267
Exposure period: Unknown--PFOS serum levels used as surrogate for exposure. Description/delineation of exposure groups/eategories: N/A
Measured or estimated exposure: N/A
Exposure levels: N/A
Statistical methods: Means calculated.
Other methodological information:
RESULTS
D(reasncgrei4b.e9r-e2s2u.l2tsp:pbT)h.eTmheeanmesaenrusmcrPuFmOPSFlOeSvellefvoerl tfhoer 5thBee5lgNieutmheproloalneddpsoaolmepdlessamwpalses17wpapsb53
ppb ppb
(range (range
39-61 ppb). 32-45.6 ppb).
The
mean
serum
PFOS
level
for
the
6
Germany
pooled
samples
was
37
SintiutidalyPsFtrOeSngltehvselainndtwheeagkenneersaslesp:opulTahteisoen-d-antoaoatrheercrdoesssc-rsiepcttiivoenailnfdoartmaautsieodn taoboduettetrhmeisnuebjaencts wbaanskcsolcloencttaedc.tedBdliododnostepraurmticwiapastec.ollPeFctOeSd flrevoemlsonvlayri3edbbloyogdebogarnakpshi--cortehgeironE;urhoopweeavnerblwohoedther ntohitskisnotowngeaosgrtahpehilactatlerdwiaffserneontceasvaoirlatbolet.heBdleomoodgrdaopnohrisc ccahanrnaocttebreisctoincssiodfertehderpeoporleesedndtaotniovresoifs the general population.
Research sponsors: 3M Medical Department
Consistency of results: N/A
CONCLUSIONS NA
REFERENCE
OTHER
raf niaAssam Report Append
vas
000268
ROBUST SUMMARY- RS29
Title: Analysis of Pooled Blood Samples from 18 U.S. Blood Banks TEST SUBSTANCE
Identity: PFOS
Remarks:
METHOD
Study design: Cross-sectional in different regionsofthe US.
data
on
PFOS
detected
in
pooled
scrum
rom
blood
banks
Manufacturing/Processing/Use: N/A
Hypothesis tested: population.
To determine the presence of
PFOS
in the serumof the
general
Study period: 1998
Setting: N/A
Total population: the US. There were
Serum pooled 68 pools and
from 18 regional blood banks an estimated 340-680 donors.
in
various
geographic
regions
in
Subject refused.
selection
eriteria:
Many
blood
banks
were
approached
to
participate,
but
manyof
them
`Total #of subjects in study: Approximated--see "total population" above Comparison population: N/A
Participation rate: 50% response
Subject description: No sera samples were taken.
information
was
provided
on
the
individuals
from
whom
the
Health effects studied: PFOS levels in blood
Data collection methods: Blood sera samples
Details drawn,
on data collection: stored, etc.
No information was provided
as to how
the blood was
Exposure period: Unknown--PFOS serum levels used as surrogate for exposure.
raf nia ssessmen Report Append
vas
000269
Description/delineation of exposure groups/categories: N/A
Measured or estimated exposure: N/A
Exposure levels: N/A
Statistical methods: Means calculated.
Other methodological information:
RESULTS
Describe results:
PFOS serum level
PFOS
across
serum levels varied by geographic location. The overall mean
pools was 29.7 ppb. The range across geographic regions was
9
ppb (Omaha, NE) to 56 ppb (Greenville, SC). The rangeofthe averages was 14 to 52
ppb.
Study strengths and weaknesses: These data are cross-sectional data used to determinane
initial PFOS level in the general population--no other descriptive information about the subjects
`was collected.
contacted did
Blood serum
not participate.
was collected
PFOS levels
from only
varied by
18 blood banks--hoaflthfe
geographic region; however
blood banks
whether this
is
to geographical differences or to the demographic characteristics of the pooled donors is not
k`gneonewrnal apsoptuhlealtaittoenr owftahsenoUtSa.vailable. Blood donors cannot be considered representativeof the
Research sponsors: 3M Environmental Lab
Consistency of results: N/A
NA CONCLUSIONS
REFERENCE Perfluorooctane sulfonate: Current Summaryof Human Sera, Health and Toxicology Data, Jan. 21,1999, 3M Company. 8EHQ-0299-373
Buxton B, Struass W, Chang O. Working Memorandum on Data Quality Assessment.
Columbus (OH): Battelle Laboratory, September 22, 1998. OTHER
Or mtdesert Append
wr
0002770
ROBUST SUMMARY - RS30 `Title: Analysis of PFOS from Pooled SerumofTwo Commercial Laboratories, 1998 TEST SUBSTANCE
Identity: PFOS
Remarks:
METHOD
Study design: sources.
Cross-sectional data on PFOS
detected in pooled serum
from commercial
Manufacturing/Processing/Use: N/A
Hypothesis tested: To determine levels ofPFOS in the serumof the general population. Study period: 1998
Setting: N/A
`STiogtmaal)p.opTuhlearteiowne:reSaipxpproooxliemdatseelrya s5a0m0pliensd,ivoibdtuaalisneidn fthreomdo2nocormpmoeorlcsifarlosmouIrntceersg(eInnatenrdgean and minimumof 200 donors in the pools from Sigma.
Subject selection participate.
criteria:
Ii was not
reported how these sourcesofblood were identified
to
`Total#ofsubjects in study: Approximated---see "total population" above
Comparison population: N/A
Participation study was not
rate: The provided.
total
numberof
commercial
sources
approached
to
participate
in
this.
Subject samples
description: were taken.
No
information
was
provided
on
the
individuals
from
whom
the
sera
Health effects studied: PFOS levels in blood
Data collection methods: Blood sera samples obtained from 2 commercial sourcesofblood
Details on data collection: stored, analyzed, et.
No information was provided as to how the blood was drawn,
Dra nial sss Report Append
vas
000271
Exposure period: Unknown. PFOS serum levels used as surrogate for exposure. Description/delineation ofexposure groups/categories: N/A
Measured or estimated exposure: N/A
Exposure levels: N/A
Statistical methods: Means calculated.
Other methodological information:
RESULTS
DPoeoslcsr.ibTehrees3ulptoso:lsPFfrOoSmsSeirgummalceovenltsaiwneerdeP43F,O4S4,atanldev4el4spopfb2(6,me2a8,n a=n4d44p5ppb)pbfr(ommeathne=3 3I3ntpeprbge)n
Study levels
strengths and weaknesses: These in the general populationof the US.
data It is
cannot be considered representative of the a small sample and no other descriptive
PFOS
iwnefroermnaottiaovnaialbaboluet. thTehseusbejedcattsawsahsouclodlloenctleyd.beGuesoegdraasphaipcrealnidmoitnhaerry daneamloygsriasopfhgiecnienrfaolrmlaetvieolsn of
PFOS levels in blood in aspecified human population.
Research sponsors: 3M Environmental Lab
Consistency of results: N/A
CONCLUSIONS NA
REFERENCE
PJearnfulauroyr2o1oc,t1a9n9e9,su3lfMonaCtoe:mpCaunryre.ntSESHuQm-m0a2r9y9-o3f7H3u.man Sera, Health and Toxicology Data,
OTHER
rat niasess Report Appeic
vo
000272
ROBUST SUMMARY - RS31
`Title: 1999
A
Pilot
Study
to
Identify
Fluorochemicals
in
Children
With
Limited
Sera
for
Analysis,
TEST SUBSTANCE
Identity: PFOS
Remarks:
METHOD
Study design: Cross-sectional pilot data.
Manufacturing/Processing/Use: N/A
Hypothesis tested: To could be used on a small
determine that the volumeofserum.
analytic
technique
used
to
test
PFOS
in
human
serum
`fTlhueorobojcehcetmiivcealosfitnhea sstaumdpylteoofbcehciolmdprleentteodpirsotvoiddeetaermmoirnee stpheecisfeircuumndceorncsetnatnrdaitnigoonfstohfeselected. distribution of these compounds in children.
Study period: Child sera samples were samples were analyzed in Spring 1999.
collected
from
January
1994
to
March
1995.
The sera
Setting: N/A
`Total population: n= 10
SMuibnjneecstotsaelDeecptiaorntmcerintteorfia:PedTihateriscesr.a sTahmepylewserweeroebtparionveiddefdrotmo 3a Mlarbgye tchleinUincailvetrrsailtoynoGfroup A cshtirledprteoncopcrcealseinntfeedctwiiotnhs siingcnhsiladnrdens.ymTphteocmhsilodfreancuwteer-eonrseestidpheanrtysnogfi2ti3s.stAatlelsoifn tthheecUhSi.ldrTehnehsaed positive throat cultures at the initial visit
Total #ofsubjects in study: n= 10
Comparison population: N/A
Participation rate: N/A
Subject description: samples were taken.
No
information was provided
on
the
children
from
whom
the
sera
Health effects studied: PFOS levels in blood Dra iilsss Ror Append
va0
000273
Data collection methods: Blood sera samples
pDreotcaeidlusroen. dTahteaecxotlrlaeccttsiown:ereSeqruaanstaimtaptlievselwyearnealexytzreadctfeodr PusFiOngSaunsiinogn-hpiagihr-ipnrgeesxsturraectliiqounid cQuharloimtaattoigvreaapnhayl/yesliescwtraosspcroanydutcatneddebmymcaosmspsapreicntgropmeeatkryreasnpdonesvealiunattheed svaemrpslusesantoetxhtartacotbetdaicnuervde. wfarosmbsatsaenddaorndsr,eawshoennabploessHiPbLlCe-.reIfstetnatnidoanrdtimmaetearnidalprweadsicntoetd amvaasilsabslpee,cctroommpeoteurndreisdpeonntsief.icaLteisosn than 100 uL_of sera were available for analysis. The limitof detection was 3 ppb. Exposure period: N/A
Description/delineation of exposure from children 6 - 12 years old.
groups/categories:
Blood
sera
samples
were
collected
Measured or estimated exposure: N/A
Exposure levels: N/A
Statistical methods: Means calculated.
O`Tthheemretmheotdhoddeotleocgtiiocnalliimniftsoramraetsiiognn:ifiTchanetlsymahlilghsearmtphlaenvroelpourmteedpoisneedarlainearlysttiucdailesr.estrictions. RESULTS
Describe results: average level was
PFOS 54 ppb.
scrum levels in these 10 These individual levels
children ranged are higher than
from those
31 to 116 ppb. The reported in pooled
samples in adults (29-44 ppb) in the general population. samples is ongoing.
A study analyzing over 600 pediatric
Study strengths and about the subjects.
weaknesses:
Very
small
number of samples,
no
descriptive
information
Research sponsors: 3M Environmental Lab
Consistency children.
of results:
To
date,
no
other data
have
been
collected
on
PFOS
serum
levels
in
CONCLUSIONS Tothheerauctohnocrlsuscioonncslucdaen tbheatdrPaFwOnSacbaonutbtehdeelteevcetlesddientevcetreydsimnatlhlisvosmlaulmlessoafmpsleeroufmc,hibludtretnh.at no REFERENCE
Lr --------
var
000274
LEanbvoirraotnomreyntRaelpoLratb,orAantaolryys.isoRefpoFrCtsNion.SFamApClTe-sGoEfNC-h0i1ld1ren's Sera, May 21, 1999, 3M
OTHER
The samples analyzed in small volumes of serum.
this
pilot
project
were
collected
to
verify
the
analytic
technique
used
on
[--------
v2
00027s
ROBUST SUMMARY- RS32
T(iPtFlOe:S;2T66-2W9e5e)kiCnaCpysnuolmeoTlogxiucsitMyonSktuedyys,wi2t0h0P0erfluorooctane Sulfonic Acid Potassium Salt
TEST SUBSTANCE
Identity: PFOS; T-6295, FC-95, CAS #2795-39-3
Remarks: Lot 217, white to off-white powder, stored at room temperature. METHOD
Method/guideline followed: Twenty-six week treatment period, followed by 52 weeks recovery. Study duration: 78 weeks
GLP (Y/N): Y
Year study performed: 2000
Species/strain: Cynomolgus monkeys
Sex: Males and females
Number of animals/sex
animals per for group 2.
dose
group:
6
animals/sex/dose
group
for
groups
1,
3,
and
4;
4
Route of administration: Oral capsule
Doses tested and frequency: 0 mg/kg/day, 0.03 mg/kg/day, 0.15 mg/kg/day, or 0.75 mg/kg/day Post-observation period: 52 weeks
Statistical ANCOVA,
mceotvahroidasteu-asdejdu:stLeedvemneea'nss,te5st%fotrwov-atraiialnecde
homogeneity: ANOVA, probability level
Dunnett's
t-test
RESULTS
NOAEL (dose and effect): 0.15 mg/kg/day.
LOAEL (dose and effect): 0.75 mg/kg/day. Death, liver effects, effect on cholesterol
Tloixviectorrebsopdoynswee/iegfhftecptesrcbeyntdaogsees,lelvievle:r D(0eabtrhaiantw0e.i7g5htmgr/aktgio/sdainy;feimnaclreesasaetd0a.b7s5olmugt/ekgli/vdearyw;eight,
alboswoelruttoetaalndchroelleasttievreolliavenrdwleoiwgehtr;hiMgahledsenasnitdyfleimpaolpersotieninthceho0l.e7s5temrgol/,kgl/ivdearyordgoasen-wgerioguhps.had
r--------
"000276
S0t.a7t5ismtgi/ckalg/rdesauyltfse:maTlheetdriefaftemreenntcegrinouwpesigwhatsastttathiesteincdaollfytsriegnaitfmiecnantt;betthweeeefnfetchteocnotnottraoll and the csthaotliessttiecarlollyasnigdnihfiigchandte;nisnitmyalliepsopirnottheein0.ch7o5lemsgt/ekrgo/ldianytdheos0e.7g5romugpkgth/edloisveergorroguapnwwaesights and twheeigohrtgsa,n-tthoe obrogdayn-wteoi-gbhotdypewreciegnhttagpeesrwceenrteasgteatainsdtictahlelyorsgiagnni-fbircaainntwaenidghint freatmiaolsewsetrhee allilver significant,
Rsteumdya.rkAst:thMeaelnedsowfei26ghweedc3k.s3-o3ft.r4ekagtmaenndt,femmaalleesswweeiigghheedd 32..78,-23..89,k3g.5a,tatnhde b3e.3gikngnifnogrotfheth0,e 02..083k,g0.f1o5r tahned00,.07.503m,g0/.k1g5/daanyd t0r.e7a5tmmegn/tkggr/oduapystrreesaptemcetnitveglryo.uFpesmraelsepesctwievielgyh.edTh3.e1,di3f.f1e,r3e.n1ceand bAetttwheeeenntdhoeftcohnetrroelcaonvdertyhepe0r.i7o5d,mdgi/fkfge/rednacyesfeimnawleeitgrhetabtmeetnwteegnrotuhpescwonatsrosltaatnisdtitcraelaltyesdiganniifmiacalnst. `were no longer obvious.
`diTewdoamfatleresdofsrionmg tohneD0a.7y5 1m5g5/k(gW/edeaky 2g3r)o.uCplidniidcanlotsisgunrsvinvoetetdo tihnethsicshaendiumlaeld sianccrlifuidceed.:Oconnestarniicmtaedl
phuyppiolasc,tipvailtey,gulmasbo,refdewr,esmpuicroaitido,n,lidqeuhiyddraantdiobnl,acakn-dcorleocruedmbfeencets,polsoitwiofno.oIdncaodndsiutmiopnt,iotnh,e animal
wdeatsercomlidnetdo ttohebetoupcuhl.moAnnareynlnaercgreodsilsivweirtwhassevdeerteecatceudtebyinpfallapmatmiaotni.onC.auOsneodfayde1a7t9h, wthaessecond
male was sacrificed in a consumption, excessive
moribund salivation,
condition. Clinical signs noted included low labored respiration, hypoactivity and ataxia.
food Causeofdeath
`was not determined.
Mfeamlaelsesanidn tfheema0l.e1s5 ianndth0e.07.575mgm/gk/gk/gd/adyaygrdoouspes-ghraoduphihghaddelnoswietrytloitpalopcrhootleeisntecrhoolleasntedromlalleoswearnd tmheaansucronetdroolnlayt tohnedtawyost1i5m3e apnoidnt1s82i,t waands nmoeapsruerdeodsidnugrivnagluterseaatrmeeanvta.iHlaDblLe cfhoorlceosmtepraorliswoans for eTahcehedfofescet gornoutpo.talHcohwoelevsetre,roolnwlyasthreevefefrescetdiwnitthhein0.57w5 emegk/skgofgrreocuopvewraysasntdattishteiceaflfleyctsiognnihfiicgahnt. density lipoprotein cholesterol was reversed within 9 weeksofrecovery. oEfsvtarraidaitoliovna,lounelsywethreedlaoywe1r82invmaallueeswagisvesingn0i.f7i5camngt./kEgs/tdraoyneonvadlauyess 6w2e,re91g,eannerdal1l8y2hbiugthebrecianutshee tvraelauteesdwfeermealseisgnoinfidcaanytsly37di6ff2eraenndt.91Trbiuitodaogtahiynrboencinaeusveaolfuveasrwiearteionnotianbtlhye ldaotwae,rnoonnedoafysth9e1seand h1o82rmionnmealveasluaensdinfetmreaalteesd ggirvoeunps0.w1e5raenddif0f.e7r5enmtg/fkrgo/mdtahyo.seoTfhecroentwreorles obtuhterthienssetadnicfefserienncwehsicwehre: nreoltacteodnstiosttehnetaodvmienritsitmraetoironboefttwheeentessetxemast,erwiearl.e nAoptpcalreeanrtlydidfofseer-ernecleasteidnatnhed sdeixdunaoltmaaptpuerairtytoofbe. Abdodtihtimoanlaelslya,nndeiftehmearlmesaluessednoirn tfheemaslteusdyincothmepl0i.c1a5tdesostehegrinotueprphraedtattriionioofdotthhyerhonoirnmeovnaeludeast.that differed from predosing values at any time during the study, and variations in triiodothyronine
Dra itlsesResport Append V
vas
000277
levels were not histopathologic
accompanied changes).
by
other
indicationsofthyroid
effects
(TSH
or
T4
level,
or
Awetitgehrtm,ilniavlersa-ctroi-fbiocde,y fweemiaglhetspeinrctehneta0g.e7s5,magn/dkgl/ivdeary-tdoo-bsrea-ignrwoeuipghhatdraitnicors.eaIsnedmaalbesso,lultievelri-vteorbody
wlieviegrhstweperrecoebntsaegrevsedweirnetwionchriegashe-ddoisnetmhaelheisgha-nddosien gonreouhpigcho-mdpoasreefdemtaolteh.eOcfotnthreolts.wo"mMaoltetslendo"t
shuirgvhi-vdionsge umnatillesth(eisncclhueddiunlgedthtoesremithnaatldsiadcrniofitcse,urovnievehatodsac"hmeodtutlleedds"acarnidfilcaer)ghealdivceern.tTrhirloebeuloafr4or
diffuse hepatocellular hypertrophy which was also Centrilobular or diffuse hepatocellular vacuolation
observed occurred
in in
all high-dose females. 2of 4 females and 2 of4
males
in
the high-dose group.
No PFOS related terminal sacrifice
lesions were reversible.
observed
at
recovery
sacrifice
indicating
that
the
effects
seen
at
This been
is a draft report completed.
that
willbe
finalized
afer
electron
microscopy
and
light
microscopy
have
CONCLUSIONS cPhFolOeSstiserotlo,xiacndtoecfyfencotmionglgloivuesr wmeoingkhetyasndatc0a.u7s5inmgg/hkepga/tdoacyelclauulsairnhgydpeeartthr,opalhtyeraantdiovnsaciunoltoattailon in breovtehrstirbelaetewdimtahilneds waenedkfsemfaolretso.taHlocwheovleesrt,ertohle, e9ffweecetsksonfocrhoHlDesLtecrhoollaesntdertohle,lainvedrwaiptpheianrato27be `week recovery period for microscopic liever effects. Remarks: None
REFERENCE
TPhootamsfsoirudm,SPaJl.t((2P0F00O)S.;2T66-2W9e5e)kinCaCpysnuolmeoTlogxuisciMtyonSkteuydsy.wiUtnhauPdeirtfelduoDrroaofcttaFnienaSlulRfeopnoirctAPcriedpared
for 3M, St Paul, Minnesota April 12, 2000. 502 pp.
by
Covance
Laboratories,
Inc.,
Madison
Wisconsin
53704-2595.
OTHER
raf nial sscssmet Report Appenic
vas
000278
ROBUST SUMMARY - R$33
Identity: N-Ethyl Perfluorooctanesulfonamido Ethanol (N-EtFOSE alcohol) Remarks: Fluorochemical FM-3924, Lot No. 547 METHOD
Method/guideline: None Test type: 104 week oral toxicity study GLP: No
Year: 1987
Species/Strain: Rat; Sprague-Dawley [Cr:COBS CD(SD)BR] Routeof administration: Oral (in chow)
Doses/concentration levels: 0, 10, 30,100 ppm N-E(FOSE alcohol Sex: Male & Female
Exposure period: 104 weeks
Frequency of treatment: ad libitum Control group and treatment: Concurrent vehicle Post exposure observation period: None Duration of test: 104 weeks
Sctoantsiusmtpictailonm,etahbosodlsu:teBaarntdlertetl=astitveestofrogranvawreiiagnhctesh,oamnodgeotnheeirtylawboarsatuosreyddfaotra;biofdtyhewediagthatws,erfeeendot sIifg,nhiofiwceavnetra,t Bpa=r0t.l0e0t1t,=sttheestdawtaaswseirgeniffuirctahnetraatnpal=yz0e.d00u1s,itnhgeadattwoa-wteairleedraDnuknendetatnd=sattewsot-(tpai#l0e.d05). oDrugnanne/tltes=isotnesctlawsasisfipceartifoonr.meAdpon=t0h.e05ranskisg.nifAicatnwcoe-tlaeivleeldwFiitshheBro=nsfeErxraocnti=Tessatdwjuasstmuesnetd ffoorr each meualcthicpellelcwoamspagrrieastoenrstwhaans2u0s,edthweinthYiantecsa=chcoorrrgeacnt/eldesCihoin-/Ssqexuacraetetgeosrtyw.asIftusheed.expected value of Remarks:
Test Subjects:
Age at study initiation: 39 0 41 days
Weight at study initiation: (Mean)
Male: group,
165.3 g for 168.2 g for
control group, 165.6 100 ppm dose group
g
for
10
ppm
dose
group,
169.1
g
for
30
ppm
dose
Female: 138.2 `group, 138.7 g
for control for 100 ppm
group, 135.6 dose group.
g
for
10
ppm
dose
group,
135.8
for 30 ppm dose
No.of 50 per
animalsper sexper dose: sex in 30 ppm dose group,
65 65
per per
sex sex
in in
control group, 100ppm dose
50 per group
sex
in
10
ppm
dose
group,
fr --
vs
000279
Study Design:
Vehicle: Chow
tSarteealtleidtaengdro3u0pwsiathndthreeacosnotnrsolthreatys)w. erDeuraidndgedt:he6f0irusnttwreeeakte,dasten1 tminoenltrhatasn(d30ath3oumsoendthwsi,th5 the
animals per sex were sacrificed and plasma samples were analyzed for organic fluorine.
EClaicnhicaanliombaslewrvaastiroenmsopveerdfofrrommedcaangde afnrdeqeuxeanmciyn:eOdbosnecrevewdeefkolry.morFboiodditcyo/mnosruimbputnidointydadtaailyw.ere
collected for Weeks 1 through determined weekly for the first
16 and once ever4y weeks 6 monthsoftreatment and
thereafter. once every
Body weights were 2 weeks thereafter.
Eye
`coenxtarmoilnaatnidonhsiugshidnogsiendriartescptroioprthtomotrsecaotpmeynat,nda/toarpsplritoxliammaptebliyomoinceroyseacro,paynwde2retope3rwfeoermkesdporinor to
terminationof the study. urinalysis were collected
Blood and urine from 15 animals
samples for hemotology, per sex per dose group at
clinical chemistry, and 3, 6, 12, 18, and 24 months.
Termination schedule: An interim control and high dose groups.
termination
at
1
year
involved
15
animals
per
sex
from
the
Organs examined at necropsy:
Organ weight: Adrenal glands, brain, heart, kidney, liver, uterus and testes for 15 animals per sex
per group.
Macroscopic examination: thorax, and cranium.
External
surfaceofbody,
all
orifices,
and
contentsofabdomen,
hMiigchrodsocsoepigrcoeupxsa:minadarteinoanl:, Taohretaf,oblrlaoiwni,negyeosr,gahneasrwt,ersemaelxlaimnitensetdinfe,orlaarngiemailntsesftrinoem,tkhiednceonyt,rolilvearn,d
slpuinnga,llcyomrpdh/bnoondeem(amrerseonwte(rviecr)t,ebmraa)m,msaprlyeeng,lasntdo,moavcahr,ietsh,ypraonicdrepaasr,atphiyturiotiadr/yt,rsaaclhievaa/reysgolpahnadg,us,
atensytigsr/oespsidlieysmioind.es,Alulrionfartyheblaabdodveer,tiustseureusswoerrperoesxtaatmei,naendyfiosrsauneimmaalsssienst(hseuslpoewctaenddtmuimdodrsl)e,daonsde
groups except: marrow.
aorta,
brain,
eyes,
small
and
large
intestines,
lymph
nodes),
and
spinal
cord/bone
Additional Endpoints:
`Mmeotnatbhoslainsdm seaxmapmliensaotfiloinv:eOrv,ekmiidgnehyt,usrpilneeena,ndlunfegc,aalnsdambpolneesmwaerrreocwolwleercetetdaakten2,f5r,o1m1,$ aanndim2a3ls
per the
sex per group at the 1 and 2 year scheduled presence ofN-EtFOSE alcohol and POS.
sacrifices
for
total
organic
fluoride
analysis
for
RESULTS
bNeOnAotEeLd t(hNatOiEnLc)i:denTcheoefinovveasrtiiaganttourbsucloanrshiydpeerrepdlaasdioasweaosfs3i0gnpifpimcanttolbyeinthcereNasOeAdEfLor.allIttsrheaotueldd `groups and apparently dose-related.
LefOfeActEs,Lin(cLluOdEiLn)g:hyTpehretrionvpehsytiagnadtovrascucoolnastiidoenr.edAg1a0i0np,pitmsthooubledtbhee nLoOteAdEtLhabtaisnecdidoenncleivoerf ovarian tubular hyperplasia was significantly increased for all treated groups and apparently
rat niasess Report Appeic
var
000280
dose-related.
Remarks:
Bfoordtyhewefiigstht6:wBeoedkysowfeitghhetsgtauidnysawnedrethdiseplroewsesredboidnythweeitrgehatte(dapmparloexsimwahteenlyco1m4p%ardeecdrteoasceonftorrols
hstiugdhy.dosTheiasnedff2ectto w6a%sdaelcsroeoabsseefrovredloiwn atrnedatmeiddf-edmoaslee)s,waasltmhaoiungthatihneedonfsoerttwhaesdusrlaotwieornoafndthtehe
difference from Tow dose at the
controls wes greater endofthe study).
(21%
decrease
for
high
dose,
15%
for
mid,
and
3.5%
for
gFeonoedr/awllayteirnccroenassuedmpitnitornea:teDdaialnyimfaelesd,cgornasduuamlpltyioinncpreeraskiinlgowghreamnmceoamnpabroeddytwoeciognhttrowlagsroup feed
intake. the last
This effect was 10 study weeks
pronounce
in
treated
males
and
less
consistent
for
treated
females
unil
cToesntsuMamteedribaylaCnoinmsalusmpotnioanm:g/Tkhge/dfaoyllboawsiins:g table summarizes the amountoftest material
TeTre Target Dore
Achieved Dose Levels - Mean (mg/kg/day)
[ ow mw ee ]
Colcicnuircraeldsiatgnsslig(hdtelsycreilpetviaont,edsreavteersitiyn, htiigmhedoofsoensmeatleasn,dwdeurreattihoen)o:nlCylocnliinciccaolnsviuglnsioocncsu,rwrihnigcmhore sfiraeqluoednatclryyoiandterneiattsedviarnailmailnsf.ectTiohne, twrietahtecdlipnoipcuallastiigonnseixnpcelruideinncgesdwoalsluesnpescutbemdanoduitbbruelaakrosfalivary `rgelsaonldvseadnwditohcicnas1i0ondaalyoscaunladrtmhaeniinfecsitdaetnicoenosf,rbeseitdwueaeln otchuelafirrscthaanndgessccwoansd emxotnrtehm.elTyhleosww.elTlhieng control population had comparable signs during Month 16. tHheemdaitfofleoregnyc:eRferdomblcoonotdrocellslwcaosunsttsatwisetriecaldleycrsiegansiefdiciannthiagth6,do1s2e, afnedma1l8esmotnhtrhosu.ghoMuotrpthheolsotguidyc;al cofhacnhgaensgeinrweasdbgleonoerdalcleyllnsowteerdeasobssliegrhtv.edHienmhaitgoheraintdvmaildu-esdofsoer fheimgahldeossaetf2e4mamloensthwse;rethe degree dsiegcnriefaisceandtilny hdiegchredaosseed fatemtahleeMsofnrtohm 3Moenvatlhua3titoonMaonndthhe2m4o.glSolbigihntvdailfufeesrewnecrese isnigwnhiifticeabnltloyod cell parameters were not considered treatment-related or biologically meaningful. aCmliinnoitcraalnCshfeemraisset,rya:lkAatliMneonphtohsp3h,astlaisghet, ianncdrebalsoeosdinuraelaanniinteroagmeinnowterraensofbesrearsev,edasipnatrrteaatteed males. Hamiignhotdroasnesf(earnadsoecacnadsiaosnpaalrltyatmeida-midnooster)amnsafleersahseadfrmoomreMopnrtonho6unucnteidl itnhcerseatsuedsy icnonacllaunsiinoen.
[Er r--------
vas
000281
Ophthalmologicfindings: No treatmentrelated effect.
Mortality and time to death: The following table summarizes the survival data:
a=
EYEN
[om we [e we]|
om] on wn]
Gross pathology incidence and severity: At the Year 1 sacrifice, high dose males had an
increased incidenceofpale and/or tan livers (other dose groups were not examined). Other
organs from treated animals were not notably different from controls. For scheduledstudy
termination sacrifices and unscheduled deathsofanimals in the `high dose group, gross findings
were primarily limited to the liver, including a increased incidence.of hepatic masses, nodules
and raised lesions, mottled livers, and yellow or `pale focal lesions.
were observed for animals in the low and mid-dose groups.
No treatment-related effects
Organ weight changes: Year | Sacrifice: Animals in the high dose group had statistically significant increased absolute and relative liver `weights and significantly decreased absolute `heart and spleen weights. Relative kidney and brain weightswerealso observed to be significantly increased in these animals. High dose males also had significantly lower adrenal (absolute) and pituitary (absolute and relative) weights and significantly increased relative testicular weights. High dose females had significantly increased relative uterine and adrenal weights. Endof Study: Only high dose animals had statistically significant increased absolute liver weights; high and mid-dose animals had significantly higher relative liver weights. Relative kidney weights were significantly increased in high dose animals. Absolutespleen weights were significantly decreased in both high and mid-dose males; however, only high dose males had significant decreases in relative spleen weights.
examined. Histopathology: Year | Sacrifice: Hepatocellular hypertrophy and vacuolation was common for
animals in the high dose group and hepatocellular necrosis was found in 6 of 15 high dose males
Endof Study:
`animals in the
Hepatocellular `hypertrophy
high dose group and found
and vacuolation were consistently observed
at lower incidence rates in the male low and
for
mid-dose
groups. Incidenceof hepatocellular cystoid degeneration appeared to be associated with dose in
`males, while this affect was observed only in high dose females. The incidence of nodular
hyperplaofstihae adrenal c
statistically significant and
ortex
dose
was. significantly increased in the high dose
dependent increase in tubular hyperplasia of
males. There was
the ovarian stroma
a
of females (0/50 in controls; 13/50 at 10 ppm; 23/50 at 30 ppm; 31/50 at 100 ppm; p<0.001 for
Pr v0e 00282 all doses by Fisher's exact test). The incidence of nodular `hyperplasiaofthe adrenal cortexwas.
significantly increased in high dose males. A statistically significant increased incidence of
foamy macrophage
neoplastic changes
accumulation in the
were not considered
lung of high dose
treatment-related.
animals
was
observed.
Other non-
Sporadic incidencesof various neoplasms were noted, including pituitary adenomas and
mammary gland adenocarcinomas; however, these did not appear to have a relationship to dose.
Hepatocellular carcinomas and adenomas were observed with the following incidences:
incidence of Hepatocellular Carcinomas and Adenormas No.of Animals Affected (%)
Joe [imme
1
aww | oom |
weeenn
||
oTchcueriinncainynocneeofacnairmcail)norn ad adenoma id nt ovrep (both nels id nor
statistical significance. `The investigators noted that while the incidenceof hepatocellular adenomas and carcinomas in
high dose females was outsideofhistorical control limits, the difference did not achieve Additional Endpoints: Metabolism examination: Results not provided (analysis performed by
Sponsor)
CONCLUSIONS
The most pronounced treatment-related effects were seen
more frequently in high dose animals than in controls. A
in the liver
statistically
and occurredsignificantly
significant increased
incidence of foamy macrophage accumulation in the lung ofhigh dose animals was observed and
thought to be possibly related to treatment. In addition, there
dose-dependent increase in tubular hyperplasiaof the ovarian
was a. statistically
stromaoffemales
significant and
rats. Based on
tumor incidence, types of tumors, onset time of tumor appearance, malignancy patternsoftumors
and the final mortality values at 2 years, the investigators concluded that
not carcinogenic in the rat under the design and conditionsofthe study.
N-EtFOSE
alcohol
was
DraftInitialAssessment Report - Appendix
V0 000283-
REFERENCE RSiTkUerDLYabOorFatForLieUs,OIRncO.CH19E8M9.ICTAWLOFYM-E3A9R24OIRNARLAT(SD.IET()RTIOKXEIRCEIxTpeYriCmAeRntCINoN.OGENICITY 0281CROO12)
--------
var
a)
000284
ROBUST SUMMARY - RS34
`Title: 4-Week Capsule Toxicity (PFOS; T-6295) in Cynomolgus
Study with Perfluoroctane Sulfonic Monkeys. Unaudited Draft. 1995.
Acid
Potassium
Salt
TEST SUBSTANCE
Identity: Potassium Perfluorooctylsulfonate, CAS No. 2795-39-3
Remarks: PFOS; T-6295
METHOD
Method/guideline followed: Range finding ~ Unaudited Draft report, sections missing Study duration: 28 days
GLP (Y/N): Y, sections missing
report
contains
GLP
statement,
but
as
submitted,
unaudited
draft
report
with
Yearstudyperformed: 1998
Species/Strain: Monkey/Cynomolgus
Sex: both
Number of animals per dose: per sex, 2.0 mg/kg/day
2
per sex, 0 mg/kg/day:
3
per sex, 0.02 mg/kg/day;
Routeofadministration: Capsule in stomach
Doses tested and frequency: 0 mg/kg/day; 0.02 mg/kg/day; 2.0 mg/kg/day
Post-observation period: none
Statistical methods used: none
wReermearrekcso:rdTedhetwmiocnekweeyesklwye.reHeombasteorlvoegdiactalleaasntddcaliilnyicfaolr cgheenmeirsatlrcylianniaclaylsseisgnwseraendcobnodduyctweedigohnts
samples collected before the beginning of the study at
day -7 (baseline values) and collected on study days 2, 7,
day and
29. 14.
Additional blood samples Blood samples for serum
for clinical chemistry were PFOS concentrations were taken
odnayda-y7sa-n7d,2d,a3y,279, w1e4,reanadna2l9.yzeIdn afodrdilteivoenl,ssoafmpesltersadfirolo,mestrone, estriol, thyroid stimulating
hormone, days. At
triiodothyronine, and necropsy a sample of
thyroxin. liver was
The study animals were terminatedas scheduled at 30 collected from each animal for palmitoyl CoA oxidase
\
ref nia ssssnens Report- Append
var
.
00028%
activity analyses. Samples of liver, testes, and pancreas were collected for proliferation cell nuclear antigen evaluation. A sampleofliver was also collected from each animal for PFOS
concentration analysis. The following organs from control and all treated groups were examined
microscopically: adrenals, eye, kidney, liver, lung, spleen, pancreas, femoral bone marrow, testes, and thymus. RESULTS NOEL (dose and effect): 0.02 mg/kg/day
LOAEL (dose and effect): 2.0 mg/kg/day. Dramatic reduction in serum cholesterol both male and female
`Toxic response/effects by dose level: Only high-dose effect, 2.0 mg/kg/day. Dramatic
reduction in serum cholesterol both male and female
Statistical results: None, high-dose too few animals (1 male, 1 female)
CONCLUSIONS
Dramatic reduction in serum cholesterol in the high dose animals. Estradiol andtriiodothyronine levels were lower in the high dose animals at the endofthe study. Since the numbersoftested
`animals are small (one male and one female in the high-dose group) and baseline levels are
variable, it is not clearifthese hormone level changes are treatment-related.
Remarks: Draft report does not discuss drop in serum cholesterol
REFERENCE
"Thomford, P.J. 1998. 4-Week Capsule Toxicity Study with Perfluoroctane Sulfonic Acid
Potassium Salt (PFOS; T-6295) in Cynomolgus Monkeys. Unaudited Draft.
for 3M, St. Paul, MN, by Covance Laboratories Inc., Madison, WI.
Study No.T-6295.6,
OTHER
`Summary revised 8/11/00
Ot etsmepu.pent
6v 00286 .
ROBUST SUMMARY - RS35
Title: First ninety-day rhesus monkey toxicity study, 1979
TEST SUBSTANCE Identity: Potassium perfluorooctylsulfonate, CAS # 2795-39-3
Remarks: FC-95
METHOD
Method/guideline followed: None
Study duration: 90 days
GLP (Y/N): No
Year study performed: 1978 Species/strain: Rhesus monkey
Sex: Males and females Numberof animals per dose group: 2/sex/group
Route of administration: Gavage Doses tested and frequency: 0, 10, 30, 100, 300 mg/kg/day
Post-observation period: None
Statistical methods used: None
sRteumdayriknsit:iatDiiosntialnldedthweatfeermawlaessuwseeidghfoerdt2h.e7v5e-h4i.c1l0ekcgo.ntrTohle. mTohnekmeaylsewsewreeiogbhseedr3v.e0d5d-a3i.l8y0fkogr at
cgheenemriasltrcyliannicaallysseisgnasnadnudribnoadlyyswiseiwgehrtescwoenrdeucrteecdoradtetdhweebeekglyi.nniHnegmoaftotlhoegsitcuadly.anTdhcelisntiucdaly was
tspelremeinn,atpeitduaitfatreyr,2k0iddnaeyyss,duteesttoest/hoevadreiaetshaonfdbtrheaimnonwkeeryes.weiAgthende.crTophseytthhyerohieadr/tp,arlaivtehry,roadirdewnearles:,
wpereisgehrevdedafitnerRufsisxaetlilo'n.s fiTxiastsiuvee.s wTehreefporlelsoewrivnegdoirngabunfsfferreodmnceountrraoll 1a0nd%aflolrtmraelaitne;d tghreouepyseswweerree
ecoxraomnianreydvmesiscerloss)c,opdiucoadlelny:uma,dreinlaelusm,, jaoerjtuan,ubmr,aicne,ceusmo,phcaogluosn,, reyeecst,umg,alklibdlnaedydser,,lihveearr,tl(uwnigt,hskin,
mspelseeennt,erpiacnclryeamsp,hpnroosdtea,ter/euttreorpuhsa,rbyonngee/albolnyemmpahrnroodwe,(mrbamjumnactriyon)g,lasnadl,ivnaerryvegl(awnidt,hlmuumsbcalre)s,pinal
Dre ii sessment Report Apps
vou000287 :
cord, pituitary, stomach, testes/ovaries, thyroid, parathyroid, thymus, traches, tonsil, tongue, urinary bladder and vagina.
RESULTS
NOAEL (dose and effect): None
LOAEL (dose and effect): None Toxic responseleffects by dose level: Allofthe monkeys in the treated groups died.
Statistical results: None
R10e0mamrgk/skg:/dTahyegmroonukpedyisedinbetthewe3e0n0dmagy/sk3g-/5d,atyhegrmoounpkdeiyesd binetthweee3n0dmagy/skg2-/4d,atyhgermoounpkdeiyesd in the
btreetawtemeenntd.ayTshe7-m1o0,nkaenydsthfermoomnaklletyhseignrotuheps10shmogw/ekdg/sdiamyilgarrosuipgndsioefdtboextiwcieteynidnacylsud1i1ng-20 of
decreased twitching,
awcetaivkinteys,se,mecsoinsvuwlistihonssoamneddpiraorsrthreaat,iobn.odyAtstnieffcernoipnsgy,,gesneveerraallboofdtyhetrmeomnblkienygs,
in
the
e1x0a0mainndat3i0o0n msgh/okwge/ddanyo gmircoruopsschoapdicalyeesilolnos.wisCho-nbgreoswtniodni,schoelmoroartrihoanogefatnhed lliivpeird;dheipslteotlioogniocf the
adrenal cortex was noted in al treated groups. No other lesions were noted.
CONCLUSIONS Remarks: Authors conclusions stated above in results. Reviewer agrees.
REFERENCE Goldenthal, EL,
D.C.
Jessup,
R.G.
Geil
and
1.5.
Mehring.
1979.
Ninety-day
subacute
rhesus
monkey toxicity study. Study No. 137-087, Intemational Research and Development
Corporation, Mattawan, ML
OTHER
PT ------
vas
.
000288
ROBUST SUMMARY - RS36
Title: Second ninety-day rhesus monkey toxicity study, 1978 TEST SUBSTANCE Identity: Potassium perfluorooctylsulfonate, CAS # 2795-39-3
Remarks: FC-95
METHOD Method/guideline followed: None
Study duration: 90 days
GLP (Y/N): No
Year study performed: 1978 Species/strain: Rhesus monkey Sex: Males and females
Number of animals per dose group: 2/sex/group
Route of administration: Gavage
Doses tested and frequency: 0,0.5, 1.5, 4.5 mgkg/day
Post-observation period: None `wSetrateisctoicmaplamreetdhboydsanuaslyesdi:s oBfovdayriwainsc,eh(eomnaet-owlaogyicclaals,sibfiiocacthieomni),caBlaratlnedttu'rsintaelstysainsdatnhdeorgan wis appropriate t-test using Dunnett's multiple comparison tables to judge significance of differences.
Rsteumdayrkinsi:tiatDiiosntialnldedtwhaetfeermawlaessuwseeidghfoerdt2h.e7v-e3h.i7c5lkeg.conTtrhole.moTnhkeemyaslweesrweeoibgsheerdve2d.5d5a-i3l.y55fokrg at
`cgheenmeirasltrcylianincaallysseisgnasnadnudribnoadlyyswiseiwgehrtes
cwoenrdeucrteecdoradtedthweebeekgliyn.niHnegmoafttohleogsitcuadly
and and
clinical after 30
and
9te0stdeasylsoovfartireesaatmnednbtr.aiAntwenreecrwoepisgyhtehde. hTeahret, tlhiyvrero,ida/dpraernaatlhs,yrsopildeewne,rpeiwtueiitagrhye,dkiadftneerysf,ixation.
Tfiixsastuievse.weTrheepfroelsleorwviendgionrbguafnfserferdomnecuotnrtarlol10an%dfaolrlmtarleiant;edthgereoyuepss wweerree perxeasmeirnveedd in Russell's
microscopically: adrenals, aorta, brain, esophagus, eyes, gallbladder, heart (with coronary
ef na ssssmen Report Append
"000289
vessels), duodenum, ileum, jejunum, cecum, colon, rectum, kidneys, liver, lung, skin, mesenteric
Iymph node, retropharyngeal lymph node, mammary gland, nerve (with muscle), spleen,
pancreas,
pituitary,
sptroosmtaacthe,/utteesrtuess,/obvoanreie/sb,otnheymroairdr, opwar(artihbyjruonicdt,iotnh)y,musasl,ivtarraychgelaa,ntdo,nsliul,mbtaorng`usepi,nuarlicnoarrdy,
`bladder and vagina.
RESULTS
NOAEL (dose and effect): None (Reviewer disagrees, see remarks)
LOAEL (dose and effect): 0.5 mg/kg/day (Reviewer disagrees, see remarks)
"Toxic response/effects reported by dose level:
4.5 mg/kg/day - 4/4 monkeys died between: `weeks 5-7, clinical signs (anorexia, emesis, black
stool, dehydration), significant
the adrenals, moderate diffuse
reduction
atrophy of
in serum cholesterol, marked diffuse lipid depletion
pancreatic acinar cells, moderate diffuse atrophy of
in
serous alveolar cells.
1.5 mg/gk/day ~ clinical signs (soft stools, diarrhea), reduced
alkaline phosphatase activity and serum potassium (females),
body weight, reduced serum
reduced serum cholesterol (1/2
females), reduced inorganic phosphate (1/2 females).
0.5 mg/kg/day -- clinical signs, (soft stools, diarrhea), slight reduction in serum alkaline phosphatase
`Statistical results:
Statistical results are generally reported as a comparison to the controls, and males and females
are treated separately. With
caught rhesus monkeys, this
the small numbers (2/sex/group) and the fact that
type of comparison may not be as appropriate for
these were:wild-
manyofthe
endpoints as acomparisonofthe actual change in individual values for various parameters from
pre-study individual values. A case in point is the analysis of alkaline phosphatase, as discussed
at length below.
Remarks:
All monkeys in the 4.5 mg/kg/day group died or were sacrificed in extremis between week $ and
7ofthe study. Beginning on the first or second day of the study, these monkeys exhibited signs
ofgastrointestinal tract toxicity including anorexia, emesis, black stool and dehydration. All of
the monkeys
convulsions,
had decreased activity and just prior to death
generalized body trembling and prostration.
showed marked to severe rigidity,
The mean body weight decreased from
3.44 kg at the beginningof the study to 2.7 kg at week 5. After 30 daysoftreatment, there was a
sacitginviiftiyc.anAttrendeuccrtoiposny,inmseearnumorcghaonlewsetiergohltsanwderae5c0o%mpraerdaubclteioanmionnsgertuhem caolnktarloilneapnhdotsrpehaatteadse
monkeys. Histologic examination showed several treatment related lesions. All the male and
f`meomdaelreastehaddifmfausrekeatdrodipfhfyuosfetlhiepidpadnecprleeattiiocn eixnotchreinaedrceenlallss.witOhndeemcraelaeseadndcetllwosifzeemaanldeslohsasdof
ot
ret
000290
Zalyvmeoolgaernceglrlasnuclheasr.actTewriozemdalbeysdaencdreoanseedfceemlallseizheadanmdodleosrsatoef cdyiftfoupsleasamtircopghryaonfuletsh.e serous
Awlelemkoonfktehyesstiundtyh,eth1e.5mmogn/kkegy/sdahyadgrdoeucpresausrevdivaecdtiuvnittiyl. thSeigennsdoofftghasetrsotiundtye.stiDnuarlitnrgactthteoxfiircsitty wanedreblnoooteddy osctcooals;ioantatlhleyednudroifngtthheesstutduyd,yaannodreixnical,uddeedhybdlraactkiostnooolr,gdeinaerrrahleab,omduyctoruesmbilninthgewsetroeol ndortoepdp.edAlftrhoomu3g.h15staktgisattictahlesbigengiifnincianngceofwatshensottuadcyhtioev2e.d9,3tkhge matetahne beonddoyfwetiheghsttuodfy,thaenmdatlhees `thmeeafnebmaoldeyswheaidghatosifgntihfiecfaentmarleedsucdtrioopnpiendsferroumm3a.l2k2aklignteoph2o7sp5hakte.aseAfatcetriv9i0tydaanyds osferturmeatment, paontdaasnsoituhmerlehvaeldsawreerdeucntoitoendiinnitnhoergreapnoirct.phOosnpehaotfet.hNeefcermoaplseys hraevdevaleerdy nloowtrseeartummencthroelleastteedrol lesions.
All monkeys in gastrointestinal
the 0.5 mg/kg/day tract oxicity were
group noted
oscucravsiivoendalulnytidlutrhienegntdhoef
stthuedysatunddy.incSliugdnesdodfiarrhea,
soft
S`tAooelrs,9a0nodraeyxsioafantrdeaetmmeesnits,. aOsclciagshitodneaclrleya,sdeeicnresaesreudmaacltkivailtiynewpahsonsopthaetdaisnetwhareseonfottehdeimnotnhkeeys.
report. Necropsy revealed no treatment related lesions.
"STihgenisftiucdayncreepaoprptesasrisgtnoifbiecaantcdoemcpraeraisseosnoinfalmkaalleinaenpdhofsepmhaalteagsreoiunpalmleoasnsewgirtohupcso.ntrTolhse. teDstueforto tchoempsamralilsonnumobfeirnsdiovfidaunailmvaallsuaesndobwtiadienepdotaefnttriasltvuadryiaitniitoinatiinowniwlidt-hcapurgeh-tstruhdeysuvsalmuoenskweoyusl,daseem mExoarmeianpaptrioopnroiaftteh.eTihneditvaibdluealbevlaolwuepsraesnednttshealmlatghneitinuddieviodfuaclhadnagtae fionrtahleksaelivnaelupehsosfprhoamtatshee.preSotcucduyrrteodtihnettheerm0.v5amluge/kwgitahnidn t0h.e15comngt/roklgadnodsdeodsgerdougprso.uAps sruegpgoersttesd tshiagtninfoicsaingtn"ifdieccarnetasceh"anignes allekvaellianse aphLoOsEpLh.ataTsheeinretphoert0.t5abmlge/s kagctduoalsleydsghroowupa issitghneifpircianmtardyifbfaesriesncfeorartetprhpeese<nt0i.n0g5tlhiesvedlofsoer a{lhkeasltianteispthicoaslpchoamtpaasreiisnotnheagmaailnesst,tahendcotnhtirsolis; thaokweenvaesra, idnecrreeaalsiety., tTihsisclmeaarylybeinceorrrroerc,tsbiansceedbootnh mvaallueessajcutsutalhlayppsehnoewdedtoabpeprcooxnismiadteerlaybl1y0l%oweirnctrheaansetsheiinr atlwkoalminaelephcoosnpthraotlacsoel.lTehaeguiersp.reB-assteuddyon his analysis, it would appear that a NOAEL for the study does exist, and that this NOAEL is 0.5
mgke.
Dr niilAssessReport pedi
v1000291
Table. Individual and group mean alkaline phosphatasevalues.
Tndividual and Mean Alkaline
`Phosphatase (IU/L) by Time Period
`Absolute
| Change,
| Percent.
| Change,
and Dose Group
Dose Animal
Pre-Study | Pre-Study
Through | Through
Group
Term Term
CMoonmkeoys
M[T de [m0 |T G0] 671] Pre-Study | 1 Month 3 Months FFs [Tmo [iiss [5% | _ea| 2513]
SDomseog[Me[aMan7AS [r [e72s5 [[9sm% a [[[6os3oe| ||__s -A7s5oe5|] tfoa6so6o]]l
GMroonukpeys [Ven [s [sw i | 4s 2 er]
DGTorSsomewoke[[MF77458060 [11[ 02800 {Tss o [o6 | t | 380e 04|] 2336.0114]]
MToinknegyss[[[FVM7e701[[f4[ o96u0s Dfo[ ns o [7se | | s d8r s6]] 1db8ee7so0s)]]
DGorsoew [[FM7assosr [[9t6osts Monkeys [F7soy [7a
[[[ ssiees | || r4o0a1]] d4o1a5r5]] [o[ es | Atl isis]
[ew [10s [So |= | 4ss| 877]
`CONCLUSIONS
As reported,
noted in the
the
0.5
study
mg/kg
does
dose
not have
group (t
a 'NOAEL, s
he low dose).
ince
In
areduction in
actuality, this
alkaline
reviewer
phosphatase
believes that
is
a
NOAEL of 0.5 was obtained in the study as aresultofinappropriate analysis of alkaline
`phosphatase values.
REFERENCE
Goldenthal, EL,
`monkey toxicity
D.C.
study.
Jessup,
Study
NRo..G.1G3e7i-l09a2n,dIJn.tSe.mMaetihornianlg.Re1s9c7a8.rcNhiannedtyD-edvaeylsoupbmaecnutte
rhesus
Corporation, Mattawan, MI.
"
----
--
ROBUST SUMMARY - RS37
Title: Ninety day study in rats, 1978 TEST SUBSTANCE Identity: Potassium perfluorooctylsulfonate, CAS # 2795-39-3
Remarks: FC-95
METHOD
Method/guideline followed: None
Study duration: 90 days
GLP (YIN): No
Year study performed: 1978
Species/strain: Charles River CD (Sprague-Dawley) rat
Sex: Males and females
Number of animals per dose group: S/sex/group
Route of administration: Dict
Doses tested and frequency: 0, 30, 100, 300, 1000, 3000 ppm Equivalent to 0, 2, 6, 18, 60, 200 mg/kg/day
Post-observation period: None
Swtearteisctoicmaplamreetdhboydsanuasleysdi:soBfodvayriwainsc,eh(eomnaet-owloagyicclaals,sibfiicoacthieomn)i,caBlaratlnedttu'rsintaesltysainsdatnhdeorgan wis appropriate t-test using Dunnett's multiple comparison tables tojudge significance of differences.
RTehmearankism:alTswheermealoebssewreviegdhedadil1y96fo-r23ge2ngeraanldcltihneicfaelmsailgensswaenidghbeoddy1w6e5i-g2h0t6sgwaetrsetruedcyoirndietdiation.
wbeeegkilnyn.ingHoefmatthoelosgtiucdyalanadndafctleirni3c0alacnhdem9i0sdtaryysanoafltyrseeastmaenntd.urAintalnyescirsowpesryethceo,nldiuvecrt,eaddratentahles,
sfipxlaeteino,n.pitTuiistsaurye,skwiedrneeypsr,easenrdvberdaiinnbwuefrfeerweedignehuetdr.alT1h0e%thfyorromiadl/ipna;ratthheyeryoeisd wweerree pwreeisgehrevdedafitner
R`muiscsreolslc'ospifciaxlaltyi:ve.adrTehnealfso,laloorwtian,gbroarigna,n,sefyerso,m ,choenatrrtol(waintdh aclolrtorneaatreydvgerssoeulpss),wdeuroedeexnaummi,neildeum,
Dv nit AssRepeort nAppetdic
"000293
j`geljaunnd,umn,ercveecuspml,eecno,lopna,ncrreecatsu,m,prkoisdtnateey/su,telriuvser,,blounneg,/bsoknine,mmaersernotwer(isctelmyummp)h, nsoadleiv,ar, ymaglmamnda,ry lumbar spinal cord, pituitary, stomach, testes/ovaries, thyroid, parathyroid, thymus, and urinary bladder.
RESULTS
NOAEL (dose and effect): None
LOAEL (dose and effect): 30 ppm (2 mg/kg/day)
Toxic responseleffects by dose level: 3000 ppm -- 10/10 rats died between days 7-8.
1000 ppm 300 ppm --
-- 10/10 rats died between days 8-14. 5/5 male rats died between days 13-25;
5/5
female
rats
died
between
days
18-28.
"sAec1o3n0d,ar1y0(0s0plaenedn,30me0s0enptpemri--c hliysmtpolhogniocdelses)ilonysmpinhotihed porrigamnasr,y s(ttohmyamcuhs,, ibnotnesetimnaesr,romwu)scalnedand
skin. 100
ppm
--
2/5
males
and
2/5
females
died
during
week
S
and
a
third
male
died
during
week
11,
`fmoeoadncboondsyumwpetiigohntssiwgenrifeicraendtulcyerdedbuyce1d6,.s7i%gn(imfailceasn)t raendduc1t6i.o3n%in(fheemmaalteosc)riatt (smtauldeyst)e,remriyntahtrioonc,yte
s(imganliefsi)c,anhtemioncgrleoabseinin(maablseolsu&te f(efmeamlaelse)s,)laenudkorceyltaeti(vmea(lmeasl)e,sa&nd freemtailceulso)cylitveer(fweemiaglhets)ancodunretlsa,tive
Kidney weight. A100, 300, 1000
and
3000
ppm
--
slight
to
marked
focal
necrosis
of
hepatocytes.
(3f0empaplmes--) aSingdnirfeilactainvterleidvuecrtwieoingihntf(omoadlecsonasnudmpfetmiaolnes()m.ales), significant increase in absolute
`Atall dose levels -- very slight to slight cytoplasmic hypertrophy of hepatocytes in the
Scteanttirsitliocbaullarresruoltmsi:dzo1n00alprpemgi--onssi,gneisfpieccainatllryediuncmtailoens.in food consumption
Remarks: days 13-25
Allofthe and days
1r8a-t2s8infotrheth3e00m,al1e0s0a0nadndfe3m0al0e0s,ppremspgerctoiuvpeslyd,ieidn.
Death the 300
occurred between ppm group. At
of100tr0eaptpmmen,t.deaTthheocractusrriendalblebtuwtetehnedlaoywses8t-1d4o,seangdroatup30s0h0owpepdm,sitghnesorfattsoxdiiceditbyetiwnceleundidnagys 7-8
emmaatceriiaatlioanr,ocuonndvtuhlesiaonnosgefnoiltlaolwrienggiohna,ndilnicnrge,asheudncsehnesditbiavictky, troedexmtaetrenrailasltiamruoluin,drethdeuceeydesa,ctyievliltoyw
and moist red material around the mouth or nose.
`Tmharleees maanldetsheantdwotwfoemfaelmeasledsieidndtuhrein1g00wpeepkm5graonudptdhieetdhiprrdiomra1l0esdciheeddudluerdinsgacwriefeicke.11oTfwtohoefthe
astnuddyf.emAatlestgurdoyuptse,rmrienspaetcitoinv,elmye.anAvbeordaygewefiogohdtscownesruemrpetdiuocneddubryin1g6t.h7e%enatnidre1s6t.u3d%y pienrtihoedmale
t(@r/eraattmiednaty,)hweamsatsoilgonigfiiccavnatlluyersewdeurceedcofomrpamraalbelseaandmofnegmatlheescaotnt1r0o0lpapnmd. 10A0ftperpm30grdoauypsso.fClinical
cuhreeaminsittrryogaennalvyasleusesationnmealmeosnatnhdsfheomwaeleds,a asingdnicfriecaatnitniinnecrpehaossepihnomkienaanseglauncdosaelkianlimnaeles, blood
phosphatase values for females. After 90 daysof treatment at 100 ppm, the two surviving males,
rap nia sss Report Append V
vor
000204
shuardvisivginnigfifceamnatllyesrehdaudcseidgneirfyitcharnotclyytre,edhuecmeodglhoebmiong,lohbemiantaocnrdirteatincdulloecuyktoeccyotuenctosu,natss;wetlhle atshree sSlhioghwteldy lsloiwgehrt teorymtohdroecryattee, ihnecmraetaoscersitinapnldalsemuakogclyutteamciocunotxs.alaTcewtoicoafntdhepysruurvviicvitnrganfseammailneasse dacatyisv.itieRse.latUirvienalliyvseirswreeisguhlttswwaesresicgnoimfpiacranatbllyeiancmroenasgedtrienattehde amnadlecsonatnrodlagbrsoouluptseaat n3d0 raenladti9v0e liver weights were significantly increased in the females. Relative kidney weights were significantly increased in both sexes.
bAoldyratwseiinghtthse w3e0rpeprmedgurcoeudpbsyur8v.i7vaenddun8t%il itnhetheenmdoafltesheansdtufdeym.alAets,srteusdpyectteirvmeliyn.atiAovn,ermaegaenfood
c3o0npspumm.ptiHoenmadtuorlionggitchevaelnutiersewsetruedycopemrpiaordab(gl/eraatmidoanyg) wtahescsoingtnrioflicaanndtly30repdpumcegdrfoourptahte 3m0alaensdat
i9n0cdraeyass.edOanlkealfienmeaplheossphhoawteadsaesllievgehltalty3e0ledvaaytse.d gAltu9co0sdealyesv,elonaendmaolnee smhaolweesdhmoowdeedraates.lightly
hinacdresaisgensifiincagnltucionscere,absleosoidn uarbesaolnuitteroagnednraenldatyiv-eglluitvearmywleitgrhatnss.peTphtiedamsaeleacstihvaidty.sigTnhieficfaenmtales
decreases in absolute and absolute pituitary weight.
relative adrenal The biological
swiegingihftisc,anacbesoolfuttehethcyhraonigde/spairnatmhaylreoiodrgwaenigwhetigahntds
is
unclear since similar changes were not noted in higher dose groups.
VAatrnyeicnrgodpesgyr,etersoeaftmdeinstcorleolraatteidognroasnsd/loersieonnlsarwgeermeepnrtesofetnhteinlialvlertraenadteddigscrooluoprsatainodn oifnctlhueded g`grloaunpdsu.larCemnutcriolsoaboufltarhetosmtiodmzaocnha.l Hciysttooplloagsimciecxhaympienrattrioopnhyaolsfohsehpoawtoeedytleessiaonnsdifnoaclallrneeactreosdis wadadsitoibosn,erevsepdeciinaltlhye alimvoern;gthreatisnicnidtehnec3e0a0,nd1r0e0l0atainveds3e0v0er0itpypwmergerogurpesa,tetrreianttmheentmarleelsa.tedIn `himsetsoelnotgeircicllesyimopnshwneordeesn)otleydmpihnotihde porrgiamnasr,ys(ttohmyamcuhs,,ibnotensetimnaesr,rmouws)calnedasnedcsoknidna.ryIn(stphleeetnh,ymus, `thmiasrcroonwsihsytpeodcoelflduelparliettyiownasinntohteedn.umTbheersapnldeesnizweaosftslhieghltylympahtoroipdhifeoldlwiciltehs aancdorirnetshpeobnodnineg dinectrheeasmeesiennttheeriscizleyamnpdhnnuodmebse.r Mofucloysmaplhohiydpefroklelricalteossiasndancde/llosraancdanathsoismiislawradsepolbesteirovnewdaisn ntoheted fDoercersetaosmeaacthroapnhdymiunctohsealhehieghmtorarnhdatgheisckwneersesonfottehde ivniltlihewgelraendnuoltaerdpionrtthieonsomfatllheinstetsotmianec.h. Atrophyof the skeletal muscle was noted, as well as epidermal hyperkeratosis and/or acanthosis `was noted in the skin.
CONCLUSIONS
Remarks: Authors conclusions stated above in results. Reviewer agrees.
REFERENCE Goldenthal, EL,
D.C.
Jessup,
R.G.
Geil
and
J.5.
Mehring.
1978.
Ninety-day
subacute
rat
toxicity
study. Study No. 137-085, International Research and Development Corporation, Mattawan, M1.
OTHER rat itlsess Report Appi
. "000295 -
ROBUST SUMMARY - RS38 Title: 13-Week Dietary Toxicity Study with N-Methy! Perflurooctanesulfonamido Ethanol (NMFOSE) in Rats.
TEST SUBSTANCE Identity: N-Methy! Perflurooctanesulfonamido Ethanol (N-MeFOSE) Remarks:
METHOD Method/guideline: None Test type: 14 week dietary toxicity study GLP: Yes Year: Not specified (Study start date: August 27, 1998) Species: Rat Strain: Crl:CD'(SD)IGS BR Route of administration: Oral (in chow) Doses/concentration levels: 0, 3, 30, 100 ppm N-McFOSE
Sex: Male & Female Exposure period: 14 weeks Frequencyoftreatment: ad libitum Control group and treatment: Concurrent vehicle Post exposure observation period: Not specified Duration of test: 14 weeks (Stpa<t0i.s0t5i)ca,ltmreatnshfoodrsm:atLieovnisnew'esretesutsefdortvoasrtiaabnicleizheotmhoegveanreiiantcye;. inCocamspeaorfishoetnetreosgtesntcoiotkyovfarviaarnicaence ahentaelryozgeednebiotdyyiwnteoigchotnssiadenrdatbioodny. wOenieg-hwtacyhaanngaleyss,ifsooofdvcaornisauncmept(iAoNn,OVoArg)a,nifweaipgphltisc,abalned: gcornotuipncuoomupsapriastohnosl.ogGyrvoaulupesc.om1pfasriigsniofniscawnet,reDuenvnaeltuta'tsedteastt tpheerf5o.r0m%e,dtwfoor-tcaoinlterdolprvos.batbrielaitteydlevel.
Test Subjects: Age at study initiation: 39 10 45 days Weightat study initiation: 184 10 236 g (males); 140 to 179 g (females) No.ofanimalsper sexper dose: 20 per sex in each dose group
Dra itl Assesment Report Append V
00396
Study Design:
Vehicle: Chow Satellitegroups and reasons they were added: Not specified dCaliilnyic(aalmobasnedrvpamt)i.onEsapcehrfaonirmmaeld waansdfrreemqouveendcyf:roOmbsceargveeadndfoer xmaomribindeidtyat/mloearsitbounndcietwyetewkilcye. oFfotordeactomnesnutmpatnidownedeaktlaywtehrereeacfotlelr.ectBedlowoedekslaym.plBeosdfyorwheiegmhattsolwoegryeadnedtecrlimniinceadl cohnetmhiestfriryst day euvrianlaulaytsiiosnwweerreeccoolllleecctteeddffrroomm1100aanniimmaallss//sscexx//ggrroouuppdduurriinnggWWeeeekks145. and 14. Urine samples for wTeerremicnoaltliecotnedscfhoerdpuallem:it5oaynliCmaolAs/osxcixd/agsreouapndwePrFeOsSacrainfailcyesdisa;t bWleocodk s5amapnldeWseweekre14c.ollTehceteldifveorrs Serum PFOS determination. These animals were not necropsied. The remaining animals were sacrificed at Week 14 and necropsied. Organs examined at necropsy: Macroscopic examination: External surfaceofbody, all orifices, thoracic, abdominal, and cranial cavities, organs, tissues Mhiecrfoivsecro,psitcomeaxcahm,inaatnidomn:acrLoivsecrospiacndlemsaicornsoswceorpeicexlaemsiionnesdweforremeixda-mdionseedanfiomrallso.w-dToissesuaensimlaisltse;d under Tissues preserved were examined for the control and high dose groups and for animals undergoing unscheduled sacrifice. Organ weights: Adrenal, brain, kidney, liver, ovary, spleen, testis, thymus, thyroid with parathyroid T`eissospuheasgupsr,eseeyrevse,d:feAmdurrenwailt,haboortnae, mbraarirno,wc,ecHuamrd,ecreiravnixg,lacnodl,onh,eadruto,dielneuumm,,jeepjiudniudmy,miksi,dney, lgelsainodn,s,ovlairveyr,,plaunncgrewaist,hpmiatuiintsartye,mprborsotnacthei,,rlecytmupmh, nsoadlievsar(ymegsleanntde,rsicciaatnidc nmearnvdei,busleamri)n,almavemsimcaler,y stkheylreotiadlwmiutshclpea,rastkhiynr,osipdi,ntarlacchoerad,, usrpilneaerny, bsltaedmdeurm, wuitetrhusb,ovnaegimnaar,roZwy,mbsatlo'msacghl,antdests, thymus, Additional Endpoints: Serum PFOS determination: 5 animals/sex/group were sacrificed at Week 5 and Week 14 and blood samples were collected. Palmitoyl-CoA oxidase analysis: Liver samples were collected from each animal at sacrifice. Liver PFOS determination: Liver samples were collected from each animal at sacrifice. Proliferation Cell Nuclear Antigen (PCNA) evaluation: Liver samples were collected from 5 `animals/sex/group at terminal sacrifice.
RESULTS NOAEL: 3 ppm (reduced weight gain, but no significant effect on absolute body weight). hLyOpAerEtLro:ph3y0apndpmva(curoeldautcieodn,boddeycrweeaisgehdt,seirnucrmecahsoeldesltiveerrolweaingdhtt,ricgelnytcreirliodbeuslar hepatocellular
ratntlAsessmes Report AppiV
Vos 000297
Remarks: `Baondd yfowremiaglhte:s Taensdtfmeamtaelreiaslg-rievleante1d00lopwpemr.boSdtaytiwsetiigchaltlsywseigrneifnioctaendtlfyorlomwaelremsegainvebno3dyanwdei3g0htpspm w1e0r0epnpomteddobseeggirnonuipn.g aStigWneifcikca4ntalnydlcoownetrimnueianng btohrdoyuwgehitghhetsenwdeorfethnoetesdtubdeygifnornianngimaatlWseicnkth7e cahnadncgoenstiwneuriengsptohrraoduigchaltlhyeseingndoiffitcahnet sfotrudmyalfeosr mianltehse i3n0tphepm30dpospemgdroosuepgarnodupf.orBaondiymawlesiggihvten 100 ppm. Overall body weight changes (Weeks 1 - 14) were statistically significantly lower for all treated groups. F1o0o0dp/pwamtdeorsceognrsouumpp,tifooond:cAolntshuomupgthisotnatwisatsicallolwyesrigfnoirfmicaalnetsognilvyenat3W0eaenkd 11300foprpmmalwehseinn the cloowmeprarfeododtococnonsturmopltsifoonr tmhoasntcoofnttrhoelsstautdyW.eeFkesma3l,e4s, i6n,7t,he111,00anpdp1m2.dose group had significantly Test Material Consumption: The following table summarizes the amountoftest material consumed by animals on a mg/kg/day basis:
RT `Target Dose
`Test Material Consumption
Mean we Achieved Dose | ewe Levels (Range) [mg/kg/day] |
os oasos0n | ozmeuss-oan sonasmson | asmesams ssussose zn | 1miss-0am
Clinical signs (description, severity, timeof onset and duration): There were no apparent test `material-related observations noted. Hematology & Clinical Chemistry: Treatment was associated with:
Tower hematocrit (100 ppm animals), higher albumin (100 ppm males), lower globulin (30 or 100 ppm males), Tower cholesterol (30 or 100 ppm males & 100 ppm females), lower triglycerides (30 or 100 ppm males & 100ppm females), higher alanine aminotransferase (100 ppm males), and higher ureanitrogen (100 ppm animals).
Dra itl sessReport Appi
aos
_
000298
`Emfofdeecrtastwe.erAelmliflidndeixncgesptwetrheosmeoornecphroolmesitneernotl aatnWdeterikgl1yc4etrhidaensaftoWrehiegkh-5.dosMeemaanlecso,rpwuhsiccuhlawrere
tVooltruemaetmwenats. siOgtnhiefricsatnattliystliocwalelry sfoirgnhiifgicha-ndtosdeifffeemraelnecse;s twheirseficnodnisnigdewraesdoifncuindceenrttaaliannrdelnaottionship
treatment-related.
Ophthalmologicfindings: No treatment-related effects
tMoorsteavleirteylaancedrattiimoenotfotdheaettha:l.OnTehefreemawleereinntohema3cpropsmcodpoisce ogrromiucprwoascsospaiccricfhiacnedgeosntDo aiynd5ic9atdeue
that this condition was test material-related. All other animals survived to scheduled sacrifice.
hGirgohs-sdpoastehaonliomgayl,s.incDiadrekncfeocai nodr saerveearsitwye:rLeaorbgseeravnedddiinfftuhseelgyladnadruklalirvsertsowmearcehoofbhsiegrhv-eddoisnesome,
animals. Test material-related findings were not observed for animals in other dose groups.
Organ weight changes: Liver weights (absolute and/or relative ratios) were significantly
increased for animals in the 30 and 100 ppm dose groups.
hHiigsht-odpoastehoalnoigmya:lsO:nseliogrhmt-otroe-omfotdehreatfeoclelnotwriinlgobturleaartomrendti-frfeulsaetehdeplaitvoecreelflfuelcatrs
were observed hypertrophy,
in
c`meinntirmiallo-btuol-asrltioghmticdozaognuallatoirvdeinfefcursoeshise,pamtionceilmlaullahrepvaatcoucoellaltuiloanr. pCiegnmternitl,obmuilnairmahle-ptaot-oscleilglhutlar
dheycpreeratsreodphayt wthaiss daolsseo.obAselrovwedinicni3d0enpcpemofamniimnailmsa,lahletphaotuogcheltlhuelairncviadceunocleatainodnsoecvceurrirtyedwiansmales
rienltahteiv3e0lyplpomw dionsciedgernocuep.ofmTuhcosliavleroerfosoinoens30inptphemgfleamnadluelahrasdtmoimnaicmhawlacsoaogbusleartvievdeinnectrhoesis1.00A
`ppm dose groups and was considered to be possibly related to treatment. No test material-related
changes were seen in animals in the 3 ppm dose group.
Additional Endpoints:
`Serum PFOS determination: Analyses reported separately by Sponsor.
Palmitoyl-CoA oxidase analysis: Treatment was associated with higher hepatic palmitoyl CoA
oxidase for animals in the 100 ppm dose group.
Liver PFOS determination: Analyses reported separately by Sponsor.
Proliferation Cell Nuclear Antigen (PCNA) evaluation: Analyses will be included in the final
report
CONCLUSIONS
dCohsreosniecxadmiientaerdy.exHpeopsautroecetloluNl-aMrehyFpOeSrtErowpahsy aasnsdocoitahteerdhweiptahtolcoewlleurlabrodeyffewcetisgwhtesreatoablsletrrveeadtmiennt
haneimmaatloslofgryompatrhaem3et0earsn,d p1a0r0tipcuplmarldyosdeecgrreoauspes.d chCohlaenstgeersolinanvadrtiroiugslyccleirniicdaellcevheelmsi,swterryeaanldso
obscrved for animals in the 30 and 100 ppm dose groups.
>
REFERENCE oCcotvaannecseulLfaobnoraamtiodroieEst,haInnoc.l 1(9N9-9.Mc1F3O-SWEe,ekT-D6i3et1a4r)yiTnoRxaitcsi.tyAUStDuIdyTEwiDthDNR-AMFetThyMlayPer2f5l,uo1r9o9-9. oo
Dv mii Assent Report -Appi V
"1900299
ROBUST SUMMARY - RS39
STiutllfeo:ni1c0A4c-iWdeePkotDaisestiaurmy SCahlrto(nPiFcOTSo:xiTc-i6ty29a5n)diCnarRactisn.ogSenuimcmitayrSytRuedpyowrittWhePeerkfl5u3o.rooctane
TEST SUBSTANCE
Identity: PFOS: T-6295 Remarks: No details in interim report
METHOD
Method/guideline: Not specified; presumably standard 2-year chronic toxicity and
carcinogenicity trial
Test type: Chronic Toxicity and Hepatocellular proliferation rate;
PCaarlcmiintoogyeln-iCcoitAyowxiitdhatSiaotnel(lmiteeasAunraeloysfepseroofxSiesroumme
PFOS
levels;
proliferation); Mitochondrial activity; Interim histopathology
GLP: Yes
Year: Interim report issued 1999 Species/Strain: Rat; Crl:CD' (SD) IGS BR Route of administration: Oral (dietary) Doses/concentration levels: 0, 0.5, 2.0, 5.0 20.0 ppm T-6295 in diet. Sex: Male and Female Exposure period: 104 weeks, but this is 53 week interim report Frequencyoftreatment: Daaid llibityum Control group and treatment: Basal diet Post exposure observation period: NA, one recovery group (see table below) Duration of test: 104 weeks, but this is a 53-week interim report. Statistical methods: Unknown for bioassay. Student' T-test for Palmitoyl Co-A oxidation analysis.
Remarks:
Test Subjects:
Age at study initiation: 6-8 weeks Weight at study initiation: 100-300 grams No. ofanimalsper sex per dose: 360 males, 360 females. See table below.
rat itlsess Report Append
7 000300
Dietary Level (ppm)
Number of Animals per Sex per Dose
| Males| Females | Week 4 sac* | Week 14 sac* | Week 53 sact*
(n) 0)
mon
(m) 0/0
(m) 0/0
Tw eo TTeewe[ [ws [w ws [[w wenn]] Tm Tele TT |
* Sacrifices at week 4 and 14 were performed to determine hepatocellular proliferation rates
((vpiaalmmeitaosyulr-eCmoeAntooxifdaptrioolni)f,ermaittioocnhcoenldlrniuaclleaacrtiavinttyigaennal(yPseCsN,A)an,dbhiioscthoepmaitchaollaongayl(ysWeesek 14
only).
** Intermediate sacrifice after at least 52 weeksoftreatment. Hepatocellular proliferation rates were determined via BrDU incorporation.
Vehicle:
Basal diet
Hepatocellular proliferation rates, performed by Pathology Associates International. See
separate write-up. Determination ofcyanide insensitive Palmitoyl-CoA oxidation . Performed by Centre for
Xenobiotic Research, Universityof Dundee, Study Number XRO108. See separate write-up.
Mitochondrial activity analyses
Histopathology
Recovery
Clinical observations performed and frequency:
Hematology, clinical chemistry, urinalyses, urine chemistry during weeks 4, 14, 27, and 53
Organs examined at (interim) necropsy:
Week 14: adrenals, brain, eyes, kidneys, liver, mesenteric lymph node, pancreas, spleen, testes, and ovaries.
000301
Week 53: All tissues from Control and 20.0 ppm interim group members
RESULTS NOAEL (NOEL) LOAEL (LOEL)
None identified by testing lab None identified by testing lab.
REMARKS All remarks apply for weeks 4, 14, 27, and 53, unless otherwise noted. Bweoidgyhtwseicgohmtp:arMeadletso:coAnntirmoalldsuraitntghewehiegkhses9t-5d3.oseAl(l20o.t0heprpmtr)eahtaedd sgirgonuipfsicsanhtolwyeldowneorsmigenainficbaondty differences in body weights relative to control. Fceommaplaerse:dAtnoicmoanltsroaltdtuhreihniggwheesetkdso3e-s53(.20.A0llpoptmh)erhtardeastiegdnigfriocaunptslyshloowweerdmneoasnigbnoidfiycawnetights differences in body weights relative to control
Food/water consumption:
M(2a0l.e0s:ppAmlt)htoeungdhednotto ccoonnsissutmenetlleyssstaftoiosdtidcaulrliynsgigwneiefikcsan1t-,2a4;ninmoalssigrneicfeiicvanitngditfhfeehriegnhceesitndfoosoed
consumption relative to controls (or other treated groups) observed in weeks 28-52.
Females: At highest dose (20.0 ppm) animals showed a statistically significant decrease in food
consumption relative to controls during weeks 2-44.
Clinical signs (description, severity, time ofonset and duration):
Test lab reports no apparent test Unscheduled deaths occurred in
material-related 3 males and one
clinical female
observations fed 20.0 ppm
noted through Week 53. PFOS. 2/3 males and 1/1
fatetmrailbeusteedxthoibtihteeaddlmairngies,tmroatttiloendo,fotrhdeitfefsutsemlaytedrairakl lwieverres.obNseorvoetdh.er gross changes that could be
Hematology: Nseogmreemnatrekdanbeluetrfoipnhdiilnsgsinexmcaelpetsftoraeratsetdataitst2i0c.a0llpy psimgnaitfitchaent14i-ncwreeeaksesaimnptlhienagb.soTlhueteenffuemcbtedridonfot persist, and may have been spurious.
Biochem: Urea nitrogen: mildly higher (statistically significant) for males and females fed 5.0 or 20.0 ppm. Not considered adverse. Cholesterol: mildly to moderately lower for males and females fed 20.0 ppm. Not considered adverse. A{elsatnlianbesaompiinnoetsratnhsatfefriansdei:ngmsilldikleylyhiagshseorcifaotremdawlietsh fheidst2o0p.a0thpoplmog.icNaoltficnodnisnigdseorfedheapdavteorcseel,laulnadr hypertrophy and vacuolation. Glucose: mildly lower for males and females fed 20.0 ppm; statistically lower for males fed 2.0 or 5.0 ppm at week 53.
ratntlAssesses Report Append
va
000302
Satellite Study: Determination of cyanide insensitive Palmitoyl-CoA oxidation Ophthalmologicfindings: Nothing remarkable. Mortality and time to deat Males: no significant changes in survival up to interim (53 week) sacrifice Females: sight decrease (unknown statistical significance) in treated groups (100% vs. ~94-98%, no dose-response) Grosspathology incidence and severity: Males and Females. No clear or consistent gross observations at Week 53 sacrifice attributable to administration of test material.
Organ weight changes Males: absolute and relative liver weights increased in animals treated at 20.0 ppm. Absolute and relative spleen weights decreased in males given 20 ppm. FAebmsaolleust:e slipvleeretnowbeoidgyhtwseiiggnhitfircaatnitolystdateicsrteicaasleldy astig2n0i.f0icpapntml,y aisncwraeasseadbsionlu2t0e.0lupnpgmwegiroguhpt.at 2.0, 5.0, and 20.0 ppm. Spurious, significant increases in left thyroid/parathyroid to body weight percentages observed at 5.0 or 20.0 ppm. Histopathology: Males: Centrilobular hepatocyte hypertrophy and midzonal to centrilobular vacuolation were increased in incidence and severity at 5.0 and 20.0 ppm. Fmaelmeasl,esa:ndCeinntcrrielaosbeudlacrenhtyrpielrotbruolpahryh,epwaittohcoyuttevpaciugomleanttiowne,raenodbwsietrhveldesisnstehveer2e0.e0ffpecptms tghraonupi.n
CONCLUSIONS Consistent with other studies, the liver is the primary target of PFOS in rats.
REFERENCE
Covance Laboratories. 1999. with Perfluorooctane Sulfonic
A1c0i4d-WPeoctaksDsiieutmarSyalCth(rPoFnOiSc:ToTx-i6c2i9t5y)ainnd
Carcinogenicity Study Rats. Summary Report
Week 53. Covance Study Number: 6329-183.
Dr nitAssent Ror pperdic
van
000303
ROBUST SUMMARY - RS40
Title: Oral Developmental Toxicity Study of N-E{FOSE in Rabbits (Argus 1999)
TEST SUBSTANCE Identity: N- Ethyl FOSE. Lot FM 3929
Remarks:
METHOD Method/Guideline followed (i.e, OECD 414, etc.): ICH Harmonized Tripartite Guideline, stages C&D
GLP (Y/N): Yes
Year study performed: 1999 Species/Strain: Rabbit Hra:(NZW) SPF Number of animals per dose: Twenty-two Route of administration: Oral (intubation) Dgeosstiantigonredgaiymse(nG(Dl)ist7-al2l0w(idtahyu0n).itTs)h:e Dveoheisclweewraesd2os%edTwateaenvo1l8u0mewiothf$remvle/rksge,oosnmcoesidsaily, on deionized water Doses: 0,01, 1.0, 2.5, or 3.75 mg/kg bodyweight. SBtaartliesltticsa,ltmesettahnoddsANusOeVdA: .CliIfniBcaarltldeatttasbigynivfairciaanntc@e te0s.t0f5otrhheonmoKgreusnkeailtly-.WCaolnlitsinuusoeudsfdoaltlaowbeyd by either Fischer's Exact or Dunn's Methodof Multiple Comparisons. IfANOVA significant at 0.05 then Dunnett's Test. Rweermeaexrtkras--anDietmaaills afnordadsiastceullsisteasntyudsyigwnhifeirceantthepyrowteorceoldopsaerdasmiemtielarrstaonmdadienvigartoiuopnss:anTdhekrileled ownerGeDfr2o1z.enSaamnpdlsehsipcopleldectotesdpwonesroers(e3rMu)m., Nliuvmerb,eprosoolfeddofeestusteostaalnleddp1l9acweinttahs,3,f5r,o3m,3e,acahnddoc,inth0a,t 0.1, 1.0, 2.5, and 3.75 mg/kg groups, respectively. Tkihlelreed wonerGeDex2t1r.a aSnaimmpallessfcoorlalescatteeldliwteersetsuedryuwmh,elrievetr,hepyoowleerdefdeotsuesedssainmidlaprlatcoenmtaais,n fgrroomupesacahnd
PO --------
van
000304
doe, and
that $i
0w,e0r.e1,fr1.o0z,en2.a5,ndansdhi3p.p7e5dmtgo/skpgongsroorup(s3,M)r.espNeuctmibveelrys.ofdoes
totalled
19
with
3,5,
3,3,
RESULTS NOAEL (dose and effect) - maternal and developmental: Matemal 0.1 mg/kg. Developmental 1.0 mg/ke.
LOAEL (dose and effect)~ maternal and developmental: Matemal. 1.0 mg/kg reduced weight gain on GD 7-10only. Developmental 2.5 mg/kg - abortions dTuorxiincgrGesDpo7n-s1e0leifnfe1c.t0smbgy/kdgosdeosle.evTeh-lermeatwearsnaaln:acMtautaelrwneailgwhetigdhetc:reMaeseaninwtehiegmhteagnaiBn rWediunctehde a2.l5soasnidgn3i.f7i5camntgl/ykdgedcroesaesgerdoduuprsinatgtthheesGeDti7m-e1p0earnioddGs Dat t1h0e-s1e4tpweoridoodsse.s.Food consumption was Toxic response/effects by dose level - developmental. There were 1,2 and abortions in the 0, 2.5 and 3.75 mg/kg dose groups.
Statistical results: Results discussed above were statistically significant aRestmaatirsktisca--llAydhdiigthieornianlciidnefnocreomfatliaotne troesaodrepqtiuoantselinytahsese3s.s75thmegd/aktga:grTohuep;rhepoowretvestra,tetshet.here was incidenceoftotal resorption was similar to controls.
CONCLUSIONS
Comment on author's conclusions and the GD 7-10 time period at the 1.0 mg/kg
whether you agree: The dose is the sole basis for
reduced body assuming this
weight dose is
gain a
in
LOAEL. While plausible, it is very weak data upon which to establish a LOAEL.
Tinhethsetfuadcyeoafuothnoersaabtorritbiuotneitnheth2e caobnotrrtoilosn.sTahte2r.e5 wmegr/ekg$ taobobretiroenlsataetdtthoeEntexFtOhSiEgheexrpodsousree.thTahtiiss, Gliikveelyncthheembiocadlylywerieglahttedl.osAsbaorntdiroendsuacreedlfisotoedd ibnytatkheeisntutdhey daoutehsoirtssaesemasdemvoerleoppmleaunstiablleeftfeoctb.e: associated with maternal toxicity.
REFERENCE
Final Argus Report, protocol 418-010, Oral Developmental Toxicity Studyof N-EFOSE in
Rabbits. 3M 6316.8. CD#1 00012621.pdf
Dr nitAssentReport ppeic
van
-
000305
OTHER Need to establish status of tissues taken for possible analytical work.
af iilAvsssment RepAopprentd V
560306
ROBUST SUMMARY - RS41
TITLE: Oral Teratology Study of FM3422 in Rats - Experiment No. 0680TR0010 [N-E(FOSE]
TEST SUBSTANCE
Identity: N-EtFOSE (FM3422) NR-eEmtaFrOkSsE:,Mwaittehri3a%l ipdreinmtairfiieldy aasCF6MF3O4S2E2,alLcootho7l84p.erFM3M34m2e2miodeonftiDf.RieRdiacsk9e6r%dnaatrerdow range Decemberl0,1980.
METHOD
Method/Guideline followed (i.e, specified but appears to be similar
OECD 414, in design to
etc): OECD
Actual 414.
guideline
followed
was
not
GJaLnuPar(yY,/N1)9:66T(h"eGupirdoecleidnuersefcoormRpelpireosduwcittihotnheStguednieersalforreScaofmemteynEdvaatliuoantsioonfotfheDrFuDgAs fiosrsuHeudmiann Uasned")S.afeTthyeEsvtaulduyatwiaosn cLaobnodruacttoerdy'asccSotradnidnagrdtoOtpheera1t9i7n8gGPoroocdedLuraebso.ratory Practice regulations
Year study performed: 1980
Species/Strain: Charles River Sprague-Dawley rats
Number of animals per dose: 22
Route of administration: Gavage Dadomsiinnigstreergeidmteesnt (mlaistterailallwiinthcournnitosf)l:bFyoguarvaggroeuopnsogfes2t2atitoinmed-amyast6e-d15S.prDaogsuees-Dwaewrleeaydrjautsstewdere according to the most recent recorded body weight.
Doses: 0, 25, 37.5, and 75 mg/kg/day S`tgaetniesrtaitceadlrmaentdhoomdnsuumsbeedr:sTthabele.aniTmhaelsstwaetirsetiacaslsimgentehdocdasgteosbaeccuosreddinfgortaonaalcyosmipsoutferth-e data are: oDufninmeptlta'nsta{ttieostn sfiotreds aamndannudmpbueprwoefigchotrsp,ornaumlubteear;oCfhfietsuqsueasr,enfuomrbpeerrcoefntreasbonroprtmiaolnitsiiteess., number RFeMma3r42k2s w~aDsetaadimlinainsdtedriesdciunsscoanmyoisligbnyifgiacvaantgeprtootfoocuorlgpraoruapmsoefte2r2s tainmde-dmeavtieadtiSopnrsa:gueDgeaswtlateiyonra(tGsowrteniegrh,in1g9810)7.5-T26h1e3,anaitmdaolssewseorfe0,do2s5e,d37a.c5c,oradnidng75atmag/ckongs/tdaanyt odnosdeayvsol6u-1m5e ooff comlloi/fnkincgaoalfsAibgsonssd.yenwBeoRiedgpyohrttwaeAinpgpdehdotibsssweerrveedredaciolrydefdroomn ddaayys33t,h6r,o9u,gh12d,ay152,0anodf 2ge0sotfatgieosntaftoiroanvbananonerdmtahle
000307
rcaotsn.tenAtlsl waenriemaelxsawmeirneedsafcorriftihceednuomnbdearyof20cborypcoerravilcuatelad,insulomcbaetiroonfavnidabtlhee aonvadrineosn,-vuitearbileand
sfeetxuesdesa,nndusmubbejreocfterdestoorepxttieornnalsitgerso,sasnndecnruompbsey.r
of implantation Approximately
sites. Fetuses were weighed one-thirdof the fetuses was
and
friexmeadinininBgoufietnu'ssessowleurtieosnuabnjdecetxedam1i0naesdkefloertvailsecexraamlinaabtnoiromnaulsitiinegsabliyzafrrienerheda.nd sectioning, The
RESULTS
NAONAOEALEL(doofse25anmdg/ekfgfe/cdta)y-fmoratmeartenranlalantdoxidceivteylwoapsmeinntdiacla:ted.
IAflNenOsAeEffLectfsoradreevceolnospimdeenrteadlatnoaxritciiftayctc,otuhledrenoits abeNeOsAtaEblLisohfed25whmeg/nkgl,ens effects are considered.
LOAEL (dose and effect) ~ maternal and developmental:
Matemal: 37.5 based on significant reductions occurred in 3 rats at the 75 mg/kg dose.
in
mean
body
weights
during
gestation.
Death
pDaertviecluolpamrleyntsatle:me3b7r.a5e.baIsnecdidoenncceleofft pballoaotdeirnetdhuecekdidfneteayl pbaordeynwcehiygmhatwaansd ssikgenlieftiaclacnhtlayngeelesvated
atthe 75 mg/kg dose.
TduorxiincgrGesDpo1n2s-e/2e0faftectthse hbiyghd-odsoeselegvrelou-pmaotfe1r0namlg:/kSgi/gdnaiyf.icant reductions in mean body weights
`dTeovxeilcoprmesepnotnasle/veafrfieatcitosnbsyanddosaebnloervmeall-itdieevseolfotphmeenlteanlso:fUtnhueseuyaellwyehriegohbisnecrivdeednciensalolfFM-3422 groups.
Statistical results: controls (Dunnett's
Mean test p
maternal < 0.05).
body
weights
were
statistically
significantly
lower
than
Mean liter P<0.05).
data
and
pup
weights
were
not
significantly
different
from
controls
(Dunnett's
test
Np<u0m.0b5e),roffetuses with gross findings were not significantly different from controls (Chi-square
Number controls
and percentof fetuses (Chi-square p<0.05).
with
skeleton
findings
were
not
significantly
different
from
Nseucmobnedarraynldenpseracbeenrtraotfifoentsuwseersewistighniifnitceamnatllyfihnidgihnegrst-ha-ndecvonetlrooplmse(nCthail-slqeunsaraebnpo<r0m.a0l5i)t.ies with
Rapepmeaarraknsce~,Tlhertehearrgayt,saitnaxtihae,hbilgohoddoyssetogorlosuapnddieedn.crCulsitneicdabllsoiogdnsarinoutnhdesteheanniamraesl.s Siingcnlsudoefd thin
`maternal gestation
toxicity were period in rats
not seen from the
in other rais. 37,5 and 75
Significant reductions in mean body mg/kg groups. There were no effects
weights seen on
the
DrIti Assent Report AppenVd
vais
000308
nmuamtbeemrasloofvvairayb,lmeemaanlen,umfebmearloe,fainmdpltaontatlatfieotnusseisteast,
corpora lutea, any dose.
resorption
sites
and
the
mean
sMteatainstifceatlallywseiiggnihfticwaanst isingcnriefaisceanitnlcylelfotwpearlattheaticnotnhteromlivdalaunedshiingahlldotrseeatwehdegrreoauspsn.oTclheeftwpaaslaates
swoemreetsiemeensaitntchiedecnoncterionl sotrelmoewbrdaocsem.alTfhoermsattudiyonasutahtoarlsl tdreesactrmiebnetd daonseisn;crsetaasteedinasserveelraitteyd atnod
exposure exposure
to to
FM the
t3e4st22s.ubOsttahnecres.keAlentoatlaabbleersraitginoonfs
dweevreeloalpsmoensttaatledtoaxsicbietiynogbassesrovceidatiend
with all Fm
3422
glorcoaulpiszecdontsoitshteedaroefaoafbtnohremaelmibtrieysoonfatlhleenlsennsuocfletuhse, eaylet.hoAulglheayevaarbineotrymoaflimtoirepshaoplpoegairceadl to be
aappppeeaarreandcteosbweearne aprrreessetntinwdietvhienlotphamtenlotcoafttihone. pArcicmoarrdyilnegnstofitbheersauftohromrsi,ngthtihseaebmnborrmyaolniatlylens
snuucrlreouusn.diSnegctohnedaabrnyolremnaslfeibmebrrdyeovneallopnumcelnetusp.roAgrnesasmeednndomremnatlltyo etxhceerpetsuilmtmseadnidatdeilsycussion
sseeccttiioonnicnognacnldudtehse trhaantgteohefggrroossssfilnednisnogbosefarvalteinosncsleafnt dwathse adnifafretirfeancctescraematoendgbythefrdeoesheangdroup
finrceicdheanncdessewcteiroenidnugeatnodththeemlainmniteartiaonnds ifnrheeqrueenntcyinivniwshuailcihzitnhgetlheensemclberfytoanratilfancutclweauss.creAated by
subsequent study was not able to repeat this finding.
CONCLUSIONS
tChoemsmtuednytauotnhoarsu.thHoorw'sevceornciltuissiboenlsieavnedd twhhaettthheerleynosudeafgercete:isRaenvairetwifearctgaesnseorcailaltyeadgwrietehs twhieth
wmietthhoPdFOoSf.frOetehhearnsdtusdeicetsioinninogt.heTrhilasbloernastoerfifeescthawvaesnaelvseororbespeorrvteedd ilnentshiesffleactbso.raAtorsyumwimtahrsytuodfies
the lens issue in Study Director,
the EG
GRoirktenrerL,abdoartaetdorNioevseims bceonrt6a,in1e9d81i.n
a
memorandum
to
the
file
written
by
the
REFERENCE
3Go4r2t2neinr REaGt,s"L,aJnapnrueacrhyt 2E2G,,19C8a1s.eEMxTp.erRiimkeenrtLNaubmorbaetro:rie0s6,80ITnRc.O0"0O1r0a.l TCeDraRtoOloMgy0S0t0u1d2y29o1f.FpMdf-
DGaotret"n,er3pEpG,.NMoveemmobetor
Study Files 6, 1981.
titled
"Fetal
Rat
Lens
Artifact
~
Summaryof
Developments
to
Ricker DR. 3M memo to WC McCormick. Dated December 10, 1980. CD ROM 00012992.pdf
OTHER
Any other information deemed appropriate: None
fr -- ---- ee--------------
360309
ROBUST SUMMARY - RS42
Title: Oral (GAVAGE) Developmental Toxicity StudyofN-EtFOSE in Rats (Argus 1998) TEST SUBSTANCE
Identity: N- Ethyl FOSE. Lot FM 3929
Remarks: Material, room temperature.
described
as
a
waxy
solid,
was
received
on
May
28,
1998
and
stored
at
METHOD
Method/Guideline followed (i.e., OECD HarmonizedTripartite Guidelines stages C
414, &D
etc.): The requirementsofthe ICH were used as the basis for the study
design.
The
Dpuarwploesye)orfattsheasntduddyevwealsoptomednetteocft aedmvberrsyeoeafnfdectfsettuosNc-onEs(eFqOuSenEtitnoperxepgonsaunrteCofRt:hCeDd(aSmprfargoume the
periodof implantation to hard palate closure.
(GGLLPP)(Yr/egNu)l:atiYoenssoTfhtehsetuUdSy wFaosodcoanndduDctreudgiAndmcionmipsltiraantcieonwi(tFhDAth)e,GtoheodJaLpaabnoersaetMoirnyiPsrtarcytiocfe
sHieganlitfhicaanntddWeevlifaatrieon(sMfrEoWm)thaendGLthPe rEeugruolpateiaonnsEcthoantoamfifcectCeodmtmhuenqiutalyit(yEEoCr)i.nteTghreitryeowfetrheeistoudy.
Quality has been
Assurance Unit documented.
findings
derived
from
the
inspections
during
the
conduct
of
this
study
Year study performed: 1998
Species/Strain: Rat. Sprague Dawley [Crl:CDBR VAF Plus]
tNiussmubesewreorfeatnoibmealcsolpleecrteddosfeo:r
Twenty-five in main study, possible future analyses of
3 or ina satelite study where N-E(FOSE or metabolites
Routeof administration: Oral (intubation)
gDeosstiantigonredgaiymse(nGD(l)st6-a1ll7w(idtahy u0n).itTs)h:e Rveahtisclweerweasdo2s%edTawteaevnol1u8m0ewiotf5h rmelv/ekrgs,e oosnmcoesdiasily, on deionized water
eDfofseecsts:w0e,re1,o5b,se10r,veodr 2at01m0g/mkg/gkbgodbyw/wdeaiyghatn.dBhaisgehedr.on dose-range study where bodyweight
BSatrattliesttti'csa,l tmeestthaonddsAuNseOd:VAC.linIifcaBlardtlaettatbsyigvnairfiicaanncte@test0.f0o5r thhoemnogKernuesiktalyl.-CWoanltliinsuuosuesddfaotlalboywed
by either Fischer's Exact 0.05 then Dunnett's Test.
or
Dunn's
Method
of Multiple
Comparisons.
If ANOVA
significant
at
Dr ilAsset Ror Append ee
var
000310
gRreomuaprskasnTdhkeilrleedwoenreGeDxt1r8a.aSnaimmapllsesfocrolalseactteeldliwteersetusdeyrwuhm,erleivetrh,eypowoelreeddfoesteusdessiamnidlaprltaocemnataisn,
from cach dam, that were 3,5,3,3, 2nd 5in0, 1,5,
frozen and 10, and 20
smhgi/pkpgedgrtoousppso,nrseosrpe(c3tiMv)e.lyN.umbersof dams
totalled
19
with
aFcecmlailmeatriaotns pweerrieodo,bosnerGveDd 0twaincde dGaDily4faonrdvidaabiilliytyd.urBiongdythweediogshatgseweanrde proesctorddoesdawgeeepkelryioddur(iGnDg.
6-20). 20.
Food
consumption
was
recorded
on
GD
0,
4,
and
on
alternate
days
thereafter
through
GD
RESULTS
NOAEL (dose and effect) - maternal and developmental: Maternal 5 mg/kg. Developmental 5 mg/kg.
LOAEL (dose and effect) - maternal and developmental: Maternal. 10 mg/k-g reduced weight gain. Developmental 10 mg/kg reduced fetal body weight and delays in caudal vertebra ossification. TduorxiincgrGesDpo8n-s1e2/eifnfe1c0tsmgb/ykdgodsoesel.eRvee-dlumcaetderfentaall:weMiagthetrngaalinwediugrhti:ngMteheanGDwe6i-g2h0t pgeariinordeadtuctheed 2in0tmhge/2k0gmdgo/skegggroruopu.p.Food consumption was also significantly decreased during this time period
m`Tgo/xkicg raensdpodneslealyeefdfeocstssifbicyatdioosneinlecvaeuld-adlevveerlteobprmaee.ntIanlc.reRaesdeudciendcifdeetanlceboodfywwaeviyghritbsatin1020anmdg2/0kg group.
Statistical results: Results discussed above were statistically significant
tRheemrearwekrseNnoocldienaitchasl,spirgensmaattutrriebdueteldivteorieefsfeocrtsaobforttheiontseswtemraeteoribasle.rvMeidnidmurailnagntdhetrsatnusdiyenatn(dGD
8pe-r1s0i)stdeenctraetas1e0smign/mkagtedronsael wbhoedryewtehiegrhetwgaasinawseirgenisfeiecannattddeocsreesasoefdSumrgi/nkgg,theEfGfeDct8s-w1e2rpeermioorde
rfeodlulcoewdedwbeyigahntdgianicnrienastehde w2e0igmhgt/kggaignrdouurpinthgrGouDgh1o4u-t16t.heThGeDre6w-a20spaecrtiuoadl.weFiogohdt cloosnssuomrption
decreases were observed observed on body weight
in
the
10
and
20
mg/kg
dose
groups
in
a
pattern
similar
to
the
effects
gFretoaulpsb.oFdeyrtwieliitgyhatnwdafsetsailgnviiafbiiclainttylyparreadmuecteedriwnelritetecrosmfpraormabdlaemsacirnostsheth1e0caonntdro2l0 amngd/kNg- dose
EfrtohmyItFheOS1E0 garnodup2s0.mSgig/nkigfigcraonutpdse;laanysinicnroesassiefiicnattihoenoifncciaduednacelovferwtaevbryaeriwbserweasnoatlesdo isnefnetiunsetshe
20 mg/kg fetuses. All other gross, visceral or skeletal observations (malformation and
--------
vais
000311
variations)werejudged to be unrelated to exposure to N-EtFOSE.
CONCLUSIONS
Comment on conclusions.
author's
conclusions
and
whether
you
agree:
Agree
with
the
study
authors"
REFERENCE
RFaitnsa,l Dreepcoertm,bPerrot1o7c,ol1949188.-031M1,63O1r6a.l7.(GCaDva#g1e)00D0e1v2e3l4o5pmpednftal Toxicity Study ofN-EFOSE in
OTHER
Need to establish statusoftissues taken for possible analytical work.
raf nitAsscssment Report Append V
600312
ROBUST SUMMARY - RS43
PTIETRLIEN:ATCAOLM/BPIONSETDNAOTRAALLR(EGPARVOADGUEC)TFIEORTNITLOITXYI,CIDTEYVSETLUODPYMEONFTNA-LEtAFNOSDE IN RATS 3M 418-009; ARGUS RESEARCH LABORATORIES STUDY NUMBER: 6295.9, 1999, TEST SUBSTANCE
Identity: N-E(FOSE alcohol
tReemmpaerraktsur:e.LoPtrnepuamrbeedrsFusMp-e3n9si2o9nswawserreecsetiovreedd oatnrMoaoym 2t0e,mp1e9r9a8t,uarendovsetronriegdhta,t rIonofmormation
regarding Sponsor.
the
purity,
identity,
strength
and
compositionof
the
test
article
is
on
file
with
the
METHOD
AMdemtihnoids/tGrautiidoenl(inFeDAf)olwleorweedu:sAedmaosdiafbiacsaitsiofnoorftthheestruedqyudierseimgenn.tsof the US Food and Drug `Type of study: Two-generation reproductive toxicity.
(GGLLPP)(Yr/egNu)l:atYieosn.soTfhtehestUudSyFwoaosdcaonndduDcrtuegd Aidnmcionmipsltiraatnicoenw(iFtDhAt)h,e GthoeoJdapLaanbeosreatMoirnyisPtrracytiocfe.
sHieganlitfhicaanntddWeevlifaatrieon(sMfrHoWm)thaendGLthPe rEeugruolpateiaonnsEcthoantoamfifecctCeodmtmhuenqiutalyit(yEoErC)i.nteTghreitryeowfetrheensotudy.
Quality has been
Assurance Unit documented.
findings
derived
from
the
inspections
during
the
conductof
this
study
Year study performed: 1999
Species/Strain: Rat. Sprague Dawley [Crl:CDBR VAF Plus]
Sex (males/females/both): Both.
fNeummalbeesrfoorfdaentiemramilnsaptieorndoofsree:prF,od=uc3t5iv[e25stfaetmuaslaetsDfGor f1u0l]l. eFv1alhuaadti2o5noefacFh,gseenxe,rpaetriodno;se1.0 Route of administration: Oral (gavage).
aDdomsiinnigstreergedimEeFnO(lSisEt ablyl wgiatvhagueniftosr):siFxidveaygsropruiposrotfo c35ohraabtistapteirosnexanpedrdduorsienggr1o4udpaywseorfemating. fTermeaaltemerantts winerFematrleeaterdatdsaciolynttihnruoeudghuontuitl goensetadtiaoyn,bepfaorrteursiatcironi,fiacned(alpapctraotxioinm.atFe,lyrat6s3rdeacyesivteodtal); daily gavage commencing on LD 22 and each day thereafter until sacrificed.
[--------
vam
000313
-
Doses: 0, 1,5, 10, 15 mg/kg bw/day
Premating exposure period for males/females F,, F,: F, males were dosed daily beginning 28
days before cohabitation, during mating, and until the dayofsacrifice fora totalof ~60 days
dosing. F,
sacrificed.
females were dosed for
F, rats exposed in utero
28 days before cohabitation
and during lactation; direct
and daily thereafter
dosing commenced
until
at weaning
and continued until their litters were weaned.
Statistical methods
`Homogeneityof the
used: Proportion data
Binomial Distribution.
were analyzed using the
Continuous data (body
Variance Test
weights, body
for
weight
changes, and feed consumption) were analyzed using Bartlett's Test of Homogeneity of
Variance and AnalofyVs ariiansce (ANOVA).If the ANOVA was significant(p < 0.05),
Dunnett's Test was used to identify the statistical
ANOVA was not appropriate, the Kruskal-Wallis
significanceof
Test was used.
the
In
individual groups. If the
cases where the Kruskal-
Wallis Test was statistically significant (p 0.05), Dunn's Methodof Multiple Comparisons
`was used to identify the statistical significanceof the individual groups. If there were greater
ntheacnro7p5sy%dtaitesa, fFoirshtehre'psuEpxs,acwthTiecsht wwearse ussteid.llbFoimsohrerfsouEnxdacdteaTde.stDawtaasoabltsaoiunseeddattoCeevsaalrueaatne-
bseehctaivoinoirnagl, dnaattaurianlvdoellviivnegryd,ispcrreet-ewedaantian(gnruemfbleerxo/pfhycsoircpalordaevluetleoa,pmneunmtbalerdoaftpauapnds ppoesrtl-iwteera,nitrnigals
10 a criterion) were evaluated by the Kruskal-Wallis Test.
Remarks ~ Detail and discuss any significant protocol parameters and deviations:
SSteuedyT.able [Schema on page 1-4ofthe Report to be reproduced] for schematic description of
F, Generation:
Parental rats (F,) were observed twice dailyforclinical signs. Body weights and food consumption values were recorded weekly during the treatment period in male rats; andweekly during mating and then daily during gestation, and on lactation days 1, 4,7, 10, 14, and at sacrifice in female rats.
necropsicd. Each dosage group consistedoftwosetsof female rats. Onesetconsistedofthe first ten female rats
`with confirmationofmating that were
to determine the number of corpora
dosed until `gestation
lutea, implantations,
day
and
(GD) 10,
number
sacrificed, and
of viable and
necropsied
non-viable
embryos. The remaining females comprised the second set, which delivered naturally. During the
21-day lactation period, the dams were evaluated for clinical signs during parturition and length of
gestation, and the
Pup observations
n
d
each
uring
litter
the 2
was
1-da
evaluated
y lactation
at least
period
twice daily for size and
included physical signs,
pup
body
viability at birth.
weights,`nursing
behavior, surface righting reflex,
righting reflex. Pupil constriction
pina unfolding, eye
was evaluated only on
opening,
lactation
acoustic startle response and air
day 21. On lactation day 4, liters
were randomly culled to four male and four female pups. The remaining pups were sacrificed and
Ort ttascent pends
van
000314
(TlhaectaFtyiomnaldeayrats1).werTehseacrteisftiecse,d eapniddindeycmriodpessi,edparfotsetratteh,e aennddofsdemoisnianlgvaetsitchleestiwmeeroef wpaeritguhreidt.ion Evaluations of sperm number, motility, and morphology were not included in the protocol. nTehceroFp,sigced.nerOavtairoinesfewmearleesexthaamtidneeldivaesraedbonvaetuarnadlltyhewenre usacraminfidcdebidstore nibluatrcitoantioofn idmapyla(nLtDat)io2n1saitneds wwearserceoclorldeecdt.ed fTrhoemlSivmeralferormatesatchhatpharaedntmaalteradt awnads frreommovedf,emwaeliegrhaetsdoanndLaDna2l1yzfeodr.phBalromoacdoskaimnpetliecs aTnhaleysfiisn;allrievseurlstsfroofmthtehseepaunpaslyfsreosmwtehreelniotterasovafitlhabelseeatfitvheedtaimmseofwtehriesalrseoviceowl.lected for analysis F, Generation:
gSrionucpesF,,ognelnyerthaeti1onanpdupS vmiga/biklgi/tydawyasdossiaggniefigcraonutplsy rweedruecceadrriinetdhient1o0atnhedse15comngd/gkegn/edraaytidoon.sages dTowseenstyo-ffi1,veanFd, 5gemnge/rkatgi/odnaryatbsepgeirnnsienxgpoenr LdoDse22graonudpcwoenrteinaudimnigntishtreoruegdh PthFeOdSaybybegfaovraegseacartifice. aAvto2i4dadnacyesopafraagdei,gmo.neOrnatLpeDr2s8e,xfpeemrallietteevrailnueaaticohndsocsoamgemegnrcouepdwtaosdetteestremdinien tahpeasasgieovef vaginal speaptaernactyioann.dOonneLrDat 3p4e,r msaelxepreart lietvtearluwaatsioenvacloumatmeednicneadwtaotedre-tfeirllmeidneM-tmheazageeoonf pLrDep7u0t.ial wAistshigenvmiedenntcteoocfomhaabtiitnagtiwoenrweitchoinnsiedaecrheddotosabgeeagtrGoDup0beagnadnaosnsiagpnperdotxoiminadtievliyduLalDh9o0.usiFnegmafolres ntheecrroepmsaiienddaenrodfetvhaeluadtoesdiansgdpeesrciordi.beTdhienFt,hegeFnOergaetnieornatmioanl.e rAaltls wF,ergeensearcartiifoincefdeamfatleersmawteirneg, saalclroiwfeicdedtoadnedlinveecrrnoaptsuireadlloynaLndDr2a1i.scAlliltteFr,s ugnetnielraLtDio2n1.pupDsawmesrtehastacdreilfiicveedr,ednelcirtoeprssiweedr,eand examined on LD 21 as previously described for the F, generation pups.
RESULTS
NOAEL -F,, F,, and F: F, Img/kg bw/day; reproductive NOAEL 5 mg/kg. F< 1 mg/kg bw/day based on body weight effects; reproductive Sme/kg . F, | mg/kg bwiday.
LOAEL (dose and effect) ~ F., F,, and F:
FS F, 1
mg/kg mg/kg
based based
on on
body body
weight weight
effects; effects,
reproductive greater than 5
10 mg/kg based on mg/kg, the highest
stillbirths. dose tested;
F, 5 mg/kg. Based on effects on viability & growth
Toxic responseleffects by dose level:
FF: F, had reductions in food consumption and body weight gain at 10 and 15 mg/kg bw/day.
DrIiAsses Ror Append
vz
000313
Flo,ssh,adrerdeudcuecdtilointsteinsibzeo,dpyuwpeivigahbtilgitayi,ngarto5wtmhg/akngd;sautrv1i0vaalnd 15 mg/kg there was preimplantation
mFe\//Fk:g Idnostehse.FI,ntthheereF,wetrheererewdeurcteisotnisllibnirftehsedancdonrseudmupcttiioonns ainndlibttoedr ysiwzee,igphutpgvaiianbialtittyh,eg1roawntdh, and survival in the 5 mg/kg dose group.
Statistical evidenced
droesseulrtes:spIonnstehechmaarianct,erriesstuilctss.summarized
above
were
statistically
significant
or
Remarks~ Additional information to adequately assess the data: F, Generation.
dGoesneertahlerteoxwiacistya.n Nimopatirreeatdmreingthtrienlgatreedfldeexa,tthhseorcecwuerrreednionterietahtemresnetx-.reIlnatmeadlcelirnaitcsaaltstihgens15ofmg/kg twoexriceitoyb.seSrigvneidfiicnafnetmianlcerseaisnesthien5l,oc1a0l,iaznedd a1l5opmegc/ikagd/udraiyngdopsrae-gmeatgrionugp,s.gesRteadtuicont,ioannsdilnacmtaalteioannd pfheamsaelseobfotdhyewsetiudgyh.t Rgeadinusctoicocnusrriendfionodthceo5n,su1m0patnidon15wemrge/kcgon/sdiasytednotslaygseegenroiunptsheth1r0ouagnhdou1t5all mwegi/gkhgtsgrwoeurpesraendducferdeqiunenmtallyessefernoimntthhee,5 m1g0/akngdg1r5oumpg/thkrgogurgohuopust.tOhbessetruvdya.tiToenrsmfionuanldbaotdy necropsy in both sexes were unrelated to treatment.
RnoetprsoedeuncitnivaenyTodxoicsietyg.roMuapl.eR-aretlsaftreodmeftfheect1s5omnym/aktginggroourpawneyrfeerhtailditsytaptairsatmiceatlelryssiegvnailfuiactaentd were rauetdhuocrtsiotnoibneacbhseomliutcealsleymirenlaaltedv.esiWchlielaenad dperocsrteaatseewienipgrhotsttahtaetawnedreseimnitneraplrevteesdicblye wtheeigshttudwyas ssiegennifoincaanntlaybdsioflfuetreenbtasfirso,mwchoenntroelxsp.reEsvsaelduaatsiaonnoofrgsapnertombnoudmybewre,igmhottirlaittiyooitrwmaosrpnhootlogy was not partofthe study protocol
Eresdturcotuisocnysclininlgi,ttemraatvienrgaagensd ffoerrtiilmiptlyawnetarteiosinmsilaanrdalmivoenegmbalrlygorsouwpes.reStoabtsiestrivceadlliynstihgeni1f5icmangt/kg nfoetmeadleisnetxheam1i5nmegd/okngDdoGse10g.rAoupreidnuctehed mnauimnbeporrotifoinmopfltahnteatsitoundys,itwehsearnedfleimtaerlessizbeiwrtahsedaltshoeir litters. The gestation duration was significantly reduced in the 5, 10, and 15 mg/kg dose. F, Generation
oDtehveerlsohpamdenrteadlucTeodxilciitteyr.sFizoeuranfdempaoloerspiunpthveiab1i5limtgy;/kagl gpruopuspwheardendoealdivbeyboDrLn p5.upTshean1d0tmhge/kg
cgarnonuipbahlaidzeadn oinncDreLas1e;daidndictiidoennacleopfusptsildlibeodrninptuhpeso2-r4,p4u-p7s atnhadt 8d-i1e4d doarywelarcetaptrioensupemreidods.
Vviaalbuielsitayrein92d.e8x,v9a9l.u1e,s92d.e0m,3o0n.s2traatnedth1e.s2t.e0e%pfnoartuthreeo0f,t1h,e5,do1s0ea-nrdes1p5onmsge/fkogr pdouspe,morretsapleicttyi;vely.
raf nia sesame Report Append
vam
000316
---- ee--------
mDogsgerdoeuppse.ndTehnetreanwdasstaatlissotiacatlelyndseignnciyfifcoarnrterdeudcuecdedpubpodweyiwgehitgihntsthweer| emgse/ekng
in the , 10 and group. These
15.
cwoenisgihstteenftfleyctrsevpeerasliesdteddeltahyrsouinghpouuptdtehevellaoctpamteinontpdeurriiodn.g tAhenlacutatimoofnbpbieorlieoodg.ircianllimtetearssubroersn of
imnoctlhuedresdtshuartfraecceeriivgehdti$ngorre1f0lemx,g/pkingnEatuFnfOoSlEdi(nagl,l e1y5e mopge/nkigngp,upascowuestriecdsetaardtlbeyreDsLpon5)s.e,Thaensdeair
driegvhetilnogp.mAenttrawnassieunlttdiemaltaeyliynaacgheioefvepdinfnoracuancfhoolfditnhgesweasinadliscoesseiennalilngtrhoeup|s.mgD/ukeg tgorosuepv.erNeoprumpal
imonrvtoallviitnygdtuhreisnugrvlaicvtiantgionratins wthoeul1d0 omcgc/ukrgagnrdoutpheiyt wwearsedeeuttehramniinzeedd.tThawtennotyfufritvheercascthu,dimeasle and
TfheimsaldeosFi,nrgatrsecgoimmmenencconetdinrueecdeitvhirnogudgahiltyhegagvraogwethdoasnedsomaft0i,ng1,paenrdiod ming/bkotghEs(eFxeOsSaEnadtiwneaning,
females through gestation and 21 days of nursing and lactation.
vInagtihneaplospatt-ewnecayniinngthpeer1ioadn,daSgemogf/pkrgepduotsiealgrsoeupparsawtiaosnsiinmitlhaer|tomgco/nktgroglrpouupps.anPdreaptuttaiianlment of
cseopnasriadteiroendwnaots tsoigbneiftiocxainctollyodgeilcaalyleydiimnptohreta5nmtgb/yktghebystaupdpyraouxtihmoarst.elTywooneneduaryo;ltohgiiscawlastests were.
performed maze at 70
on one daysof
rat per sex per liter; age. No chemically
passive related
avoidance at 28 days of effects were observed.
age
and
a
water-filled
M
nReecprroodpuscytiinvmeaPleersfofrrmoamnctehe. 5Bomdgy/kwgeiggrhoutpw.aMsasliegsniifnictahnetl|ymrge/dkugcegdraotutpicmoeomfmownelaynihnagdarnedduatced
rbeodduycewdeiignhtthega5i,nsbudtunroitngthtehe1,fimrsgt/mkogngtrhouopf.thIen pfoesmtal-ewseafnrionmg tpheeriSodm.gF/okogdgrcoounps,umwpeitgihotn wwaass
reduced at weaning gestation generally
and was
stihgrnoiufgichaonuttlythreedpurec-ecdohinabtihteat1ioanndpe5rimodg./kBgodgryouwpesi.ghTthigsairnedduucrtiinogn
in
wweeiigghhtt egfafienctpse.rsAits9te0ddtahyrsouogfhaoguet mlaacltaetsioan.ndRfeedmuacleeds wfeorode cmaotnesdu.mpAtfitoern mwaatsincognmsaislteesntwewritehkiblloeddy
tahnedynweecrreopksiillde.d Faenmdanleecsrowpesrieeda.llNooweedffteoctlsitotenr maantdinnugrasendthfeeirrtiyliotuynwgerunetiolbsDeLrv2e1d aitnwchitihcehr steixm.e
No toxicological findings were noted at necropsy.
F, Generation
gNroouspi.gnHiofiwceavnetre,fftehcet nonumlbitetrerosifzde,amnsuwmibtehrosftillilvboernorpuspisllwbaosrspiugnpisfiwcaasntnlyotiendcrienatsheed 1atotrhe m5g/kg dmugr/ikngg dtohseeD.LTh1etnhuomugbher1o4fpepruipodsd.eatVhisaboirliptryeisnudmeexdwcaasnn9i8b.a8l,i9z7e.d1,waasndsi8g5n.i1fi%canitnl0y,el1,evaantded smigg/nikfgicdaonstelygrroeudpusc,edresatpebcitritvhelayn;d tthherSoumgghouwtasthseiglnaicftiatciaonntlpyerreidoudceidn.thPeu5p mwge/ikghgtgwroausp.alCsloinical and necropsy findings in the F,pups were unremarkable.
CONCLUSIONS
Comment on author's conclusions and Drnialnie.esses ReRporpt ort AppAepnpdi
whether you
agree:
Generally agree.
Do not $v6e0317
suenpdaerrasttiaonnditshneotbarseilsatfeodr tdoetcehremmiincianlgetxhpatostuhreeslaitghtmbgu/tkgsi.gnWihfiilcaentsudcehlaaydienlaaygesohfopurledpnuottiable
`cmoantsuirdaetrioendala rdeeplraoydsusceteinveateftfheicst,doist ei.s entirely consistent with reduced body weight and other REFERENCE Christian M, Hoberman A & York R. Argus Research Laboratories. COMBINED ORAL (GAVAGE) FERTILITY, DEVELOPMENTAL AND PERINATAL/POSTNATAL PRrEotPoRcoOlD4U1C8-T0I09O;NSTTOUXDIYCINTUYMBSETRU:DY63O16F.5N,-EtFOSE IN RATS. Final Report, 30 June, 1999.
Oat Ameprorr pends
0i00318
ROBUST SUMMARY - RS44
RTiAtlBeB:IOTRSA-L3(MSTT-6O2M95A.C10H,TAURBGEU)SDERVEESELAORPCMHENLTAABLORTAOTXOIRCIIETYS SSTTUUDDYYONFUPMFBOESR:IN| 418012, 1999. TEST SUBSTANCE Identity: Potassium Perfluorooctylsulfonate (PFOS), CAS No. 2795-393 DRoecmuamreknst:atiPoFnOfSile-d Laolton2g17w,it9h8f.i4n%alpruerpoert(,SMNoDteA:naSlaytmiecallotRaesquuessetd 5i3n0t3w0o)-yAenaarlyrtaitcPalFOS carcinogenicity study (T-6295, Covance 6329-183). METHOD
CMoentfheorde/nGcueiodnelHianremofnoilzlaotwieodn(i(.cI.C,HO)EHCarDmo4n1i4z,eedtc.T)r:ipaTrhteitereGquuiidreelmiennetsoonftDehteecItnitoenomaftiToonxailcity rtoodReenptrsopdeucciteisownefroer uMseeddicaisnathlepbraosdiusctfso,r ssttaugdeysdCesaingdnD(Uo.fS.thFeoordeparnodduDctriuvgeApdrmoicneissstriantaionno,n1994. Federal Register, September 22, 1194, Vol. 59, No. 183). rGeLguPla(ti/oNns)o:f tThhee Us.tSu.dyFwoaosd caonnddDucrtuegdAidnmicnoimsptlriaatnicoen w(iFtDhA)th,etGhoeoJdapLaanbeosreaMtionriysPtrraycotficHee(alGtLhP) daenvdiaWteilofnasrfer(oMmHthWe)GaLnPd rtehgeuElautrioopnesatnhaEtcaofnfeocmtiedc tChoemqmuualniittyyor(EinEtCe)g.ritTyohefrtehewesrteudny.o significant Year study performed: 1999 Species/Strain: New Zealand White rabbits Number of animals per dose: 22 Route of administration: Gavage wDeorseinagdmriengiistmeerned(lPsottaalslswiiutmhPuenriftlsu)o:roFooctuyrlsgurlofuopnsatoef(2P2FpOrSe)gniann0t.N5e%wTwZeeaelna-n8d0Wbhyitgeavraagbbeiotsn igensdtiavtiidounaldabyosdy7-w2e0i.ghAts.dose volumeof S ml/kg was administered, adjusted daily on the basis of Doses: 0,0.1, 1.0, 2.5, and 3.75 mg/kg/day Sctoamtipsuttiecra-lgmeenetrhaotdesd ursaendd:omTuhneitsa.niTmahleslwititler bweasastshiegnuneidtotofimnedaisvuidrueamlenhto.usiCnlginoincatlheobbsaesrivsaotfion BainndomoitahelrDpirsotrpiobruttiioonn.datCaonwteirneuoanuasldyastead(ucs.gi.n,gmtahteeVmaarliabnocdeyTweesitghftors,Hobmoodgyewneeiigthytofchtahneges, DrfeaediciolnsAumvpteiosRnepvomratleusepsneansndd Vliter averages for percent male fetuses, percent resorbedS031
cuosnicnegpBtaurstelse,tt'fsetTalesbtodofyHwoemigohgtesn,efiettaylofaVnaormiaalyncdeastaaannddthfeetaAlnaolssyisfiiscoatfiVoanrsiiatnecdea.taI)fwtehreeAannaallyysziesd oifnVdiavriidauanlcegrwouapss.siIgnfiftihceanAtn,alDyusninesotftV'sarTiesatncweaswaussendottoapipdernotpirfiyatteh,etshteatKisrtuiscaklals-iWganilfliicsanTceestofwathse uMseetd.hodIon fcasMeusl,tiipnlwehCiocmhpKarruisskoanls-WwaalsliussTeedsttowiadsensttiaftyistthiecasltlaytissitgincailfisciagnntif(ipc<a0n.c0eo),fDtuhnen's pirndoicveidduuraelsgdreosucprsi.beCdofuonrtthdeatKaroubstkaailn-eWdalaltiCsaeTessatr.ean-sectioning were evaluated using the
pRreemganarnktsN-eDwetZaeiallaannddWdhiistceusrsababniytss(iogbntiafiincaendtfprroomtoCcoovlapnacreaRmeesteearrschanPrdodduecvtisa,tiIonncs.):, T2i2mpeedr-
ggarovuapg,ewoenregegsitavteinondodsaeysso7f-200,.0.1A, d1o.0s,e2v5olourm3e.7o5fm5gm/lkg//kdgawyaPsFaOdSmiinnis0t.e5re%d,Twaedjeuns-t8e0d dbayily on
the basis of individual body weights. clinical observations were recorded 1
hTohuerdporeiosrwteoraenodbasfetrrveddostiwnigcedudariilnyg ftohre vtiraebialtimteyn,tapnedriod
awenidgohntscewedarielyredcuorridnegdtohne pgoesstt-attrioenatdmaeynst p0earniodd6(-i2.9c.;gfeosotdatcioonnsduamypst2i0o-n29w).asMraetceorrndaeld bdaoidlyy
tthhorroaucgich,ouatbdtohemisntuadly.anOdnpeglevsitcatviiosncedraayw2a9s, ctohnedduocetsedwearnedctuhtehannizued;moafbgcrooerspsornreacrloutpesayoifn tcahceh
oanvdardyeawdasferteucsoersd,eadn.dTeharelyutaernidwlearteereexsoarmpitnioendsf.orThneufmetbusaeensrdwedriestwreibiugthieodn,ofsiemxpeldanatnadtieoxnasm,inlievde
`faonrdetxhteerbnraalinaobfnoromnaleit-iehso.afltAhlfel ffeettuusseess wweerree efxreaem-ihnaendd cfrorosvsi-ssceecrtailoannedd asknedleetxaalmaibnneodrmianlistitiue.s
RESULTS
N`TOheANEOLAE---Lmaftorerdnevaellaopnmdendteavleltoopxmiceinttyails:1T.0hemgN/kOgA/dEaLy.for maternal toxicity is 0.1 mg/kg/day.
iLs O1.A0EmLg/k(gdo/sdeaya,nbdaesefdfeocnt-a)bomrattieornsn,alinacniddendceevseolfospcmaennttafle:cesT,haendLdOeAcrEeLasfeosrimnabtoedmyalwetiogxhictity graeidnusctainodnsfionodbocdoynswuemipgthitona.ndTihnecrLeaOsAedEiLncfiodrednecveselionpfmeetnaltaalltteorxatiicointsy.is 2.5 mg/kg/day, based on
`cToonxsiicstreedsopfotnhsee/effoflelcowtisnbg:y adboosretiloenvselat- m2a.5temrgn/aklg:/dMaaytaenmdalabtoovxeicoictycuwrarsinegvoidneGntDat2a2l-l2d8;oses and
increased `gain at all
incidenceofscant doses; reductions
ifnecfeosodatcaollnsduomsepst;iornedautct2i.5onmsgi/nkmge/daanybaonddyawbeoiveg.ht
and
body
weight
d`oTosxeiscorefsp2o.5nmsge//ekfgf/edcatys banyddaobsoevleevaenld-codnesviesltoepdomfetnthael:foDlleovweilnog:pmernetdaulcttiooxnisciitnymweaasnevfeitdaelnbtoadty weight at 2.5 mg/kg/day and above; delayed ossification at 2.5 mg/kg/day and above.
Statistical results: Of nia scone Report Append
--_--
Co
az
000320
IMnactiedrennaclesdoatfa:scSatnattifsetciecsalalty 3s.i7g5nimfigc/akngt/idnacyreraeseaschiendasbtoarttisitoincsalwseirgeniofbiscearncveed(pa<t03..0715).mgD/oksga/dgaey-. dtheepe1n.d0,en2t.,5,saignndif3i.c7a5ntmbgo/dkgy/wdeaiyghdtosraegdeucgtrioounspsorfobrotdhye wenetiigrhetdloossasgees p(epr<i0o.d05(ocra0lc.u0l1at)edocaesuGrrDed7-in 2d1o)s.agDeosgraoguep-sdefpoerntdheenetntrierdeupcetriioondsoifngbeosdtaytwieoing(htGDga0i-n2s9o)cacnudrefodr itnhethgees2t.a5tiaonndp3e.r7i5odmgaf/tkegr/tdhea.y Ainvietriaatgioenobfoddoyswieniggh(tsGDwe7r-e29s;igsniigfniicfainctalnyt raetdpu<c0e.d01(pi<n0.th0e52o.r50m.g0/1)kgo/ndaGyDdo1s7a-g2e4girnoutph)e.3.75 ming/thkeg/2d.5ayanddos3a.g7e5 gmrgo/ukpg./dFaeyeddocsoangseumgprtouiposn fvoarlutehse wenetrieresdigonsiafgiecapnetlryiorded(uGcDed7-(2p1<)0,.0a5ndorth0e.01) entire period after the initiationofdosage (GD 7-29).
PFe=ta0l.0d1a,tar:esFpeetcatlivebloyd)yinwetihegh2t.s75(taotnadl,3m.a7l5edoasnadgfeegmraoluep)s.werSeigsniigfniicfainctandtellyayrsed(upc<e0d.0(5p<a0n.d050.a0n1d)
in litter groups.
and
fetal
averages
for
ossification
were
seen
at
both
2.5
and
3.75
mg/kg/day
dosage
Remarks -- Additional information to adequately assess the data:
Maternal toxicity mg/kg/day group
was and
evident at nine does
idnotshees3o.f751.m0gm/gk/gk/gd/adyaayboarntdeda.bovAel.l
One doe abortions
in the 2.5 occurred on
gsiegsntiaftiicoanntdaiynscr2e2a-se28inatnhdewienrceidceonncseiodfesrceadnttrefaetcmeesnti.nrtehleat3e.d75bymgt/hekgs/tduadyy agurtohuopr.s.ScTahnetrefewcaess a
mwaetreemaallsobnoodtyedweiingohntegaanidnstwhreereedsoicgsniifnictahnetl1y.0readnudc2e.d5imngt/hkeg3/.d7a5ymggr/okugp/s,daryesgpreoctuipveolny.gesMteaatinon
dtraeyastm1e0n-t13p,er1i3o-d16(,da1y6s-179-2a1)n,d p2o1s-t2-4t.reMatemaenntbpoedryiowde(idgahytsg2a1i-n2s9w)earnedadlusoractailocnuolfatthedefsotrutdhye (days
p7e-2r9i)o.d iTnhethree 1w.a0,s2a.5siagnndif3ic.a7n5tmrge/dkucgt/idoanyignrmouepas.n mMaetearnnablobdoydwyeiwgehigthgtaignaifnordutrhienegnttihreetsrteuadtyment
(p&e/rkigo/ddwaya)s waalssossiiggnniiffiiccaannttllyyrreedduucceeddiinnttheh2e.52.5 mmgg//kkgg//ddaayyggrroouupp.onMgeeastnatfiooonddcaoynssu16m-p1t9i,on19-21
and 21-24, as well as significantly reduced
for the entire study period (days in the 3.75 mg/kg/day group on
g7e-s2t9a).tioMn edaaynsfo13o-d16c,on1s6u-m19p,ti1o9n-2w1asand
21-
2(48,6.a4s%)w,el1l7as(7t7h.e3%en)t,iraentdr2e1at(m9en5t.4p%er)iorda.bbiPtrseignneaancchydoocscaugreregdroiunp.20 C(e9a0s%a)r,ea1n9-s(e8c6t.i4o%n)i,ng19
observations on GD 29 were respective dosage groups.
based
on
20,
18,
19,
16,
and
12
pregnant
rabbits
in
cachofthe
five
cDoervpeolroapmluetneta,alretsooxripctiitoynsw,alsievev/iddeeandt fatetdusoesse,solfit2te.r5simzeg/akngd/sdeaxyraantidoawbeorvee.coTmhpearnaubmlbeearmoonfg.
tsriegantiefdicaanntdlycornetdruoclegdroiunpts.he 2M.e5aanndfe3t.al75bomdgy/kwge/idgahytg(rmoaulpes,.feTmhaelreeawnadssaelxseosacsoimgbniinfiecda)ntwas
rgreoduupcst,ioannidn athseigonsisfiifciacnattiroendoufcttihoensintethmeuomss(ilfiitceartaivoenroafgtehse) hinyothied2.(l5itaenrdav3e.r7a5gemsg)/,kmge/tdaacyarpal
1li0t5tesreaxvteerrangale,s)soafntdtipsusbuiesalnidtesrkealentdalfeatlatlearvateiroangses()mailnftohrema3t.i7o5nmsga/nkdg/vdaraiyatgiroonusp). weOrtehecronfseitadlered
Draft InitialAssessmReepnortt- Appendic
viz
000321
------------------ ean
CS
huinsrteolraitceald tcoonttrreoaltrmaenngte.because the incidences were not dosage-dependent and/or were within CONCLUSIONS Caboomvmeeanndttohnisaruetvhioerw'esrcagornecelsu.sions and whether you agree: Conclusions are summarized REFERENCE P1r9o9v9.ideArfuglulsciRteasteiaorncohfLsatbuordaytorreiveise,wIendc.: PCrhortiosctioalnN,uMm.bSe.r,:Ho4b1e8-r0m1a2n,,JAanMu.a,ryan1d99Y9.ork",OrRaGl. (Stomach Tube) Developmental Toxicity StudyofPFOS in Rabbits". OTHER None
of nia Assos Report Appedic ----------------------------
$603z22
ROBUST SUMMARY - R45
Title: Oral Teratology StudyofFC-95 in Rats - Experiment No. 0680TR0008 TEST SUBSTANCE
Identity: Potassium Perfluorooctylsulfonate, CAS No. 2795-393 uRneimfaorrmkist:y, cTeosmtpoasnidt/ioornc,opnutrriotlyaortrioctlehecrhaprearcttienreinztacthiaornafcotrerFiCz-a9ti5o,nsLooftt6h4e0.tesTthaenidd/eonrtictoyntsrtorlength, substances were determined and documented asof May 8, 1950. METHOD
sMpeetchifoide/dGbuuitdealppienaersfotlolboewesdim(iilca.r,
OECD 414, ete): in design to OECD
Actual 414.
guideline
followed
was
not
JGaLnuPar(yY,/N1)9:66T(h"eGupirdoecleidnuersefcoromRpelpireosduwcittihotnheStguednieersalforreScaofmemteynEdvaatliuoantisoonfotfheDrFuDgsA fiosrsHueudmiann aUnsed"S)a.feTthyeEsvtaulduyatwiaosn Lcaobnodruacttoerdy'asccSotradnidnagrdtoOtpheera1t9i7n8g GPoroocdedLuraebso.ratory Practice regulations
Year study performed: 1980
Species/Strain: Sprague-Dawley rats
Numberof animals per dose: 22
Route of administration: Gavage
aDdomsiinnigstreeregdimpeonta(slissituamllpewriftlhuournoiotcst):ylsFuolufrongartoeuipnsocfom22oitlibmye-gmaavtaegdeSopnragegsutea-tDioanwldeayysra6t-s1w5ere Doses were adjusted according to the most recent recorded body weight. Doses: 0,1,5,and 10 mg/kg/day
gSetanteirsattiecdalrmaentdhoomdnsuumsbeedr:s tTahblee.anTimhaelsstwateirsteicaaslsmiegtnehdodcsagteosbaeccuosreddinfogrtaonaalcyosimspuotfetrh-e data are:
Dunnett's t test of implantation
for dam and pup sites and number
woefigchotrsp,ornaulmubteear;oCfhfietsuqsueasr,enfuomrbpeerrcoefnrtesaobrnportmiaolnitsiitcess.,
number
PRoetmaasrsikusm--peDreftlauiolroaoncdtydlsiuslcfuosnsaatenywsaisgnaidfmiicnainsttperroetdoicnolcopmaroaimlebtyergsavaangde tdoevfioautriognrso:ups of 22 time-mated Sprague-Dawley rats weighing 175-261, at dosesof0, 1, 5, and 10 mg/kg/day
DcPoFrnOsItnStainotntdsdosasmyeesnv6so-lR1uo5mroefoAgpefpsetmantdli/okng(oGforbtonedry,w1e9i8g0h)t. aTndheobasneirmvaelds wdaeirley dforsoemddaacyco3rtdhirnoguagthaday 20 Vino
----------------
CS
000323
oafngdes2t0aotfigoenstfaortiaobnnoarnmdatlheclriantis.calAslilgnasn.imBalosdywewreeigshatcrsiwfiecreed roencodradyed20onbydacyersvi3,ca6l,d9i,sl1o2c,at15i,on
avinadblteheaonvdarnioens-,viutaebrlieafnedtucsoens,tenntsuwermoeferbxeasomeripnteirdonfosrittehse, nanudmbneurmobfecroropfiomrpalalnutteaat,inounmsbiteers of
Ftheitrudsoesf wtheerefewtuesiegshweedraenfdixseedxeidn Baonudinsu'bsjescotluetditoon eaxntderenxaalmgirnoesds nfeocrrvoipsscye.ralApabpnroorxmiamlaitteielsyboyne-
free-hand sectioning. alizarin red.
The
remaining
fetuses
were
subjected
to
a
skeletal
examination
using
RESULTS
NOAEL indicated.
-maternal A NOAEL
and developmental: A NOAEL for developmental toxicity could
onof5t bmeg/esktga/bdlaiyshefodrwmhaetenrlneanlsteofxfieccittsyawracs
considered. Iflens effects are considered an artifact, there is a NOAEL of 10 mg/kg.
LmaOteArEnaLl (todxoisceitaynwdaseifndifc-atemedactbeatrsned)alonansidgndiefviecalnotprmeednutcatli:onsAinLOmeAaEnLboofdy10wemigg/hktgs/dduaryinfogr gtoexsitcaittiyonwadsayno1t2-e2s0taabtlitshheehdiagsh-hdioghseesgtrdoouspeoftes1t0edmgw/aksg/adaNyO.AEAL,LOAEL for developmental
Toxic during
responseeffects GD 12-20 at the
bhiygdh-odsoesleegverlou-pmoafte1r0namlg:/kSgi/gdnaiyf.icant
reductions
in
mean
body
weights
d`eTovxeileopremsepnotnasle/veafrfieatcitosnbsyanddosaebnloervmeall-itdieevseolfotphmeenlteanlso:fUtnhueseuyaellwyehriegohbisnecrivdeednciensalolfdose groups.
cSotnattirsotlisca(lDruensnulettst: tMesetapn<ma0t.e05r)n.al body weights were statistically significantly lower than
Mean litter p<0.05).
data
and
pup
weights
were
not
significantly
different
from
controls
(Dunnett'sttest
Number p<0.05).
of
fetuses
with
gross
findings
were
not
significantly
different
from
controls
(Chi-square
Number controls
and percent (Chi-square
of fetuses p<0.05).
with
skeleton
findings
were
not
significantly
different
from
sNeucmobnedarryanldenpseracbeenrtraotfiofnestuwseersewistighniinftiecrannatllyfihnidgihnegrst-ha-ndecvonetlrooplmse(nCthail-slqeunsaraebnpo<r0m.a0l5i)t.ies with
cRoenmsiasrtkedsof--sAidgdniiftiicoannatl riendfuocrtimoantsioinn mteoaandebqoudaytweeliygahstssedsusrtihnegdGatDa:12S-i2g0nsatofthmeahtiegmha-ldotsoexicity gtorxoiucpitoyfev1i0dmegn/tkagt/ddoays.es oNfo1o0thmegr/ksigg/ndsaoyfcmoantseirsntaedlotforxeicdiutcytwioenrse irneptohretemde.anDenvuemlboepmreonftal ainmdpltaonttaaltfieotnusseiste,s,buctorthpeordaiflfueterae,ncreessowreprteionnostitsetsatainstdictahlelymseiagnnifnicuamnbte. rsInoafddviitaibolne,muanlues,ufaelmlaylhei,gh iL ncidencesy of unossifie--d, a--ssymetrical, bipartite, and missing sternebrae were observedvainnall
000324
rdaotseeagnrdoutphser;ehfoorweevweerr,etnhoetsecosnkseiledtearledvatroiabteiotnrseawtemrenet-arlesloaotbeds.erTvehdeimnocsotntnrootlabfleetussiegsnatofthe same ydeev,elwohpimcehntwaalstnooxticsieteynobinsecrovnterdolisn. alTlhdeosperogproorutpisoncoofnsfiesttuesdesofwiabtnhotrhmeallietniseasobnfortmheallietnysoifn othnee. boreblootcahllizeendsetsowtahse asrieganioffictahnetleymhbirgyhoenrailnltehneshniugchleduoss,eaglrtohuopu.ghAallvaeryieetaybnoofrmmoarlpihtoielsogaipcpaelared to aappppeeaarreandcteosbweearne aprrreessetntinwdietvhienlotphamtenlotcoafttihone. pArcicmoarrdyilnegnstofitbheersauftohromrsi,ngthtihseaebmnborrmyaolniatlylens snuucrlreouusn.diSnegctohnedaabrnyolremnaslfiebmebrrdyeovneallopnumcelnetusp.roAgrnesasmeednndomremnatlltyo etxhceerpetsuilmtmseadnidatdeilsycussion sseeccttiioonnicnognacnldudtehde trhaantgtehoefggrroossssflienndsinogbsoefravalteinosncsleafntdwtahseadnifafretriefnacctescraemaotendgbtyhefrdeoesheangdroup finrceicdheanncdessewcetiroenidnugeatnodthtehemlainmniteartiaonnds ifnrheeqrueenntcyinivniwsuhailcihzitnhgetlheensemcblreyfoanratilfancutclweauss,creAated by subsequent study was not able to repeat this finding.
CONCLUSIONS
cChoemmimceanlltyornelaatuetdhobra'ssedcoonnclsuusbisoenqsueanntdstwuhdeietsh.eAr ysouummagarreyeo:ftThhee lleennssdiesfseucetiinstnhoetRcioknesridered GLoarbtonreart,ordiaetsedisNcoovnteamibneedri6n, a19m8e1m.orandum to the file written by the Study Director, EG
REFERENCE
RPirkoevridLeabfourlaltcoirtiaetsi,onInoc.f sEtxupdeyrirmeevnitewNeudm:bGeorr:t0er6,80ET.RG0.010988,0.DeScaefmebtyerE,va1l9u8a0t.io"nOLraabloTreartaotroylaongyd Study ofFC-95 in Rats".
DGaotret"n,er3pEpG,.NMoevemmobetor
Study Files 6, 1981.
titled
"Fetal
Rat
Lens
Artifact
-
Summaryof
Developments
to
OTHER
Any other information deemed appropriate: None
rat nie sscssmens Report Append
"$b0azs
ROBUST SUMMARY - RS46
TITLE: Rat Teratology Study T-3351 Final Report ~ Project No. 154-160 (Hazelton 1983) TEST SUBSTANCE
Identity: Potassium Perfluorooctylsulfonate, CAS No. 2795-393
Remarks: sponsoron
The test January
material, T-3351 (Lot No. 5, 1983 and was stored at
r8o0o2m75t)e,mpaerwahtiutree.powTdheer,teswtamsatreercieailvewdasfraosmstuhmeed
to on
bceom1p0os0i%tiaocnt,ivoercootmhpeorucnhda.ractIenrfiosrtimcastiwohniocnh
the methodof define the test
synthesis, stability, as wellas material, are on file with the
data
sponsor.
METHOD
sMpeetchifoide/dGbuuitdaeplpienaersfotlolboewesdim(iil.ca.r,
OECD 414, in design to
etc.): Actual OECD414.
guideline
followed
was
not
cGoLndPuc(tYe/dN)a:ccQouradliintgytAostshuersatnacnedairndspoepcetriaotnisnogfpthreocesdtuurdeysaonfdtrheevOifefwiocfetohfeQufianlailtryeAposrsturwaenrcee and iascscuoerddionngDteoctehembgeenrer22a,l r1e9q7u8i,rbeymetnhtesoFfootdheanGdooDdruLgabAodrmaitnoirsytrPartaicotnicfeorrecgoumlpaltiioannscethaotnwaenrdeafter June 20,1979,
Year study performed: 1983
Species/Strain: Sprague-Dawley rats
Numberof animals per dose: 25
Route of administration: Gavage
aDdomsiinnigstreergedimpeonta(slissituamllpewriftlhuournoiotest):ylsFuolufrongartoeuipnscoofm25oiplrbeygngaanvtaSgperoangugees-tDaatwiloneydaryatss6w-e1r5e. Doses were adjusted according to the most recent recorded body weight. Doses: 0, 1, 5, and 10 mg/kg/day
Statistical control vs.
cmoemtphooudnsd-utsreeda:teSdtagtrisotuipcamlemaenthcoodmspaursiesdonfso.r
analysis of the data:Dunnett's { If the variances were proved to
test be.
for
Mhoemaongefenteaolubso,dythweediagthatswepreer alintatlerysweedrebystoatnies-tiwcaalylyclaansasliyfisceadtiaosnfaonlalloywssi:soBfarvtalretita'nsctees(tAfNorOVA).
IhFoAmoNgCenOeVitAyowfasvasriigannicfiecsanwta,scopnetrrfoolrvmse. dtbreyaotnmeen-twgaryoculpascsoifmipcaartiiosnoonfscwoevraeriaannacleys(eAd NuCsOinVgAt)h.e
rfGoaarfmhenosimaoagnresdneseHsimoetwnyseolReflpovrmatordiAiapfnpiceceiaste,iYoAnoNfOtVhAe,TuankdeyA-NKrCaOmeVrAhowneersetleyvasliugnaitfeidcaantttdhief5fe%reonncee-tteasit.ledTests
van
000326
pervoablaubaitleidtyatletvheel.5%Cotnwtor-otlaivlse.dcopmrpoboaubnidl-ittryelaetveeld. gPreorucpenmteafentaclovmipabairliitsyo,npseorfcetnhtefaebtaolvelodsast(adewearde.
waenrdereasnoarlbyisnegdfbeytunseosn)p,aprearmceetnrticeaorlnye,-lwaatey, AanNdOtoVtaAl arensdortphteioTnesr,psatnrda-thJeonncukmhebeerreotfesdtefaodr ftreetnuds,es
`The liter Amnitage
was test
used as the experimental unit. for linear trend in proportions.
TIefraastioglnoigfyicdaanttatwreenrdewaansalnyosteedd,ustihnegretshueltCsocohfran-
oFbissheerrv'esd,"eoxriafctthteerset wwaesreaesviaglnuiafitceadntatttrheendonwei-tthaisleevde,r5e%depleavrelt.ureIffarosimgniti,ftihceanrtesturletnsdowfaFissnhoetr's
"exact" test were evaluated at the two-tailed, 5% level,
RPoetmasasriukms~peDreftlauiolroaoncdtydlissulcfuosnsaatenywassigandimfiicnainstteprreodtoicnoclopmaroialmebtyegrasvaagnedtdoevfioautrigornso:ups of 25 p(rGeDg)na6n-t15Sp(rWaegzueel-,Da1w98l3e)y.raStesxautaldloysemsaotfu0r,e S1,pr5,agauned-1D0awmlge/ykgra/tds,ayonPeFpOeSr osenxgpeesrtactaigoen,dwaeyrse dpaaiilryedvaugntiinlalcoenxfaimrimnaattiioonnosffmoarttihnegproersuenntcile tawnod wvieaebkilsithyaodfeslpapesremd.orMtahteipnrgesweanscecoonfafircmoepdulbaytory oplfu3g.mIT/hkegodfabyoodfycownefiigrhmtatwiaosnoafdmmiantiisntgerweadsanddesdiogsneastewdearsedaadyju0stoefdgeasctcaotridoinn.g Atodtohseemovsotlume mroercteanltliytyreacnodrmdeodribboudnydiwteyigahntd moenacseudraeimleyntfsor.clDinaimcasl wsiegrnesoofbsteorxivceidtyt.wiIcnedidvaiildyuaflorbsoidgynswoefights aGnDd 2fo0obdycConOs;umasppthiyoxniawteiroen raencdortdheedfeotnusGesDw6e,re8,d1e2l,iv1e6r,eadnbdy2c0.esaArneiamnaslesctwieorneonsaGcrDifi2c0e,d oAn garnodsesxnaemcirnoepdsyfowrasthpeenrufmobrmeerdaonnd apllladcaemmse.ntTohfeimutpelraunstaftrioomn seiatcesh, fneummableerwaansdeoxfcliisvede,awnedidgehaedd tfheetucsoens,tennutmsbweerreofrecmarolvyeda.ndTlhatee orveasorripetsiownesr,eaenxdaamniyneadbnfoorrmatlhietniuesmbaenrdotfhecnorwpeoirgahleudteaag.aiEnacafhter efxetmeamlaellwya.s Aepxparmoixniemdabteylgyroosnes-ntehcirrodopsfy.theEafcethusfeestuwsewraesfsixeexdedi,nwBeoiugihne'ds,saonludtieoxnamainndeedxamined afonrdvbirsacienr.alTahbenorremmaaliitniiensg bfyettuhseesWwielrseonsutbejcehcntieqduet,owaistkhelpeatratliceuxlaamriantatetnitoinonthtaottihnecleuydeesd,.palate, epevlavliucatgiiorndolefs tuhseinskgulall,izlaroinng rbeodn;ebs,onveeratleibrganlmecnotluamnnd,dreigbrceaeogef,oesxstirfeimciattiieosn, waenrdepeacltsooreavlalaunadted.
RESULTS
NThOeANEOLAE--Lmaftorerdnevaellaonpmdednteavleltoopxmiceinttyails:1
The NOAEL mg/kg/day.
for
matemal
toxicity
is
|
mg/kg/day.
LbaOseAdEoLn -climnaitcaelrnsiaglnsanofdtdoexviceiltoy,pmdeenctreaals:esTihnebLodOyAwEeLigfhotramnadtefmoaodl ctooxniscuimtpytiiso5n,mgd/ekcgr/edaaseys, in uterine weights, and an increased incidence in gastrointestinal lesions.
The and
LOAEL increases
for in
edxetveemlaolpmaenndtavlistcoexriacliatynoimsa5limegs/kagn/ddavyar,iabtaisonesd.
on
decreased
fetal
body
weight
Toxic response/effects by dose level - maternal: Clinical signsoftoxicity, decreases in body
Or nilAssmRaepanrs- ppends
van
000327
ee
weights and food consumption at 5 and 10 mg/kg/day; decreases in uterine weights, increased incidence in gastrointestinal lesions, and two deaths at 10 mg/kg/day. `Toxic response/effects by dose level - developmental: Decreased fetal weight at 5 and 10 mg/kg/day; external and visceral anomalies and skeletal variations at 10 mg/kg/day. Statistical results: Statistically significant differences between controls and treated were noted for the following matemal endpoints: mean body weight gain, mean total food consumption, and mean gravid uterine weight. Nonparametric analysisofthe mean incidence of late resorptions, total resorptions, number ofdead fetuses, and fetal loss did not indicate statistical significance; however, there was a significant linear trend towards an increased incidence in these data with respect to control. The primary trend component was contributed by the highdose group. ~ Statistically significant treatment-related increases in the incidences of visceral anomalies and skeletal variants were also observed. Remarks -- Additional information to adequately assess the data: Evidenceofmatemal toxicity, that was observed at the and 10 mg/kg/day dose groups both during and following treatment and considered to be treatment-related, consistedof hunched posture, anorexia, bloody vaginal discharge, uterine stains, alopecia, rough hair coat, and bloody crust. Significant decreases in mean body weight gains during GD 6-8, 6-16, and 0-20 were also observed at the 5 and 10 mg/kg/day dose groups. These reductions were considered to be treatment-related since mean body weight gains were greater than controlsduring the post-exposure period (GD 16-20). Significant decreases in mean total food consumption were observed on GD 17-20 in thel0 mg/kg/day dose group, and on GD 7-16 and 0-20 in both the 5 and 10 mg/kg/day dose groups. `The mean gravid uterine weight in the 10 mg/kg/day dose group was significantly lower when compared with controls. The mean terminal body weights minus the gravid uterine weights were lower in all treated groups, with significant decreases at 5 and 10 mg/kg/day. High-dose animals also exhibited an increased incidence in gastrointestinal lesions. No significant differences were observed in pregnancy rates, numberofcorpora lutea, and number and placementof implantation sites among treated and control groups. Two dams in the 10 mg/kg/day dose group were found dead on GD 17, Signs of developmental toxicity included a dose-related trend toward an increased incidence of late resorpions, total resorptions, numberofdead fetuses, and fetal loss, although, none of these effects were statistically significantly different from controls. Significant decreases in mean fetal weights for both males and females were observed in the 5 and 10 mg/kg/day dose groups. The percentofmale fetuses was 52%, 54%, and 60% for 1, 5, and 10 mg/kg/day, respectively, compared to 44% in controls. Statistically significant increases in the incidences in the number oflitters containing fetuses with visceral anomalies, delayed ossification, and skeletal variationswere observed in the high dose group of 10 mg/kg/day. These included extemal and visceral anomaliesofthe cleft palate, subcutaneous edema, and cryplorchidism as well as delays in skeletal ossificationof the skull, pectoral girdle, rib cage, vertebral column, pelvic girdle and limbs. Skeletal variations in the ribs and stemebrae were also observed.
rat nial sessmens Report Append
vax
000328
CONCLUSIONS Comment on author's conclusions and whether you agree: The developmental eye abnormalities that were seen in Gortner (1980) were not observed in the present developmental toxicity study even though the study design and doses were the same. REFERENCE Wetzel, LT. 1983. Hazelton Laboratories America, Inc. Project Number: 154-160, December 19,1983. "Rat Teratology Study, T-3351, Final Report". OTHER None
Draft Initial AssessmentReport- Appendix V
va
000329
ROBUST SUMMARY- RS47
Title: COMBINED ORAL (GAVAGE) FERTILITY, DEVELOPMENTAL AND PERINATAL/POSTNATAL REPRODUCTION TOXICITY STUDY OF PFOS IN RATS -- ARGUS RESEARCH LABORATORIES STUDY NUMBER: 6295.9, 1999.Protocol 418-008
TEST SUBSTANCE
Identity: Potassium Perflurooctylsulfonate (PFOS), CAS No. 2795-39-3.
Remarks: The test article, FC-95 (lot 217) was received on May 20, 1998, and stored at room temperature. Prepared suspensions were stored at room temperature overnight. Information regarding the purity, identity, strength and compositionofthe test article is on file with the Sponsor.
METHOD
Method/Guideline followed: This study was designed to evaluate ICH Harmonized Tripartite Guideline stages A-F. A modificationof the requirements of the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) were used as a basis for the study design.
Type of study: Two-generation reproductive toxicity
GLP (Y/N): Yes. The study was conducted in compliance with the Good Laboratory Practice: (GLP) Regulations of the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA), the Japanese Ministry of Health and Welfare (MHW) and the European Economic Community (EEC). There were no significant deviations from the GLP regulations that affected the quality or integrityofthe study. Quality Assurance Unit findings derived from the inspections during the conductofthis study `were documented.
Year study performed: 1999
Species/Strain: Rat Crl:CDBR VAF Plus (Sprague-Dawley)
Sex (males/females/both): Both
Numberof animals per dose: F, = 35. Twenty-five females for full evaluationofF,generation; 10 females for determinationofreproductive status at DG 10. F, had 25 each sex, per dose.
Route of administration: Oral (gavage)
Dosing regimen: Five groupsof 35 rats per sex per dose group were administered PFOS by
`gavage for six weeks prior to cohabitation and during 14 daysofmating. Treatment in Fymale
rats continued until one day before sacrifice (approximately 63 days total); female rats were
treated daily throughout gestation, parturition, and lactation. F1 rats selected for mating and
rearingofthe F2 generation received daily (gavage) dosesofPFOS at 22 days ofage and
thereafter.
ratntlsesRepsort Appeic
$60330
Doses: 0,0.1, 04, 1.6, and 3.2 mg/kg/day
Premating exposure direct dosing starting
period at day
for males/females: continuing until LD
Six weeks foPr 21 of F, liters.
(E,);
in
utero
and
lactation,
SHtoamtoigsteinceailtmyeotfhtohdesBuisneodm:iaPlroDipsotrrtiibountidoant.a Cwoenrteiannuaoluyszdeadtuas(ibnogdtyhweeViaghrtisa,ncbeodTyeswteifgorht changes and feed consumption) were analyzed using Bartlett's Testof Homogeneity of Variance and Analysisof Variance (ANOVA). If the ANOVA was significant (p < 0.05), Dunnett's Test was usedto identify the statistical significanceof the individual groups. If the ANOVA was not appropriate, the Kruskal-Wallis Test was used. In cases where the Kruskal`Wallis Test was statistically significant (p < 0.05), Dunn's Method of Multiple Comparisons was used to identify the statistical significanceofthe individual groups.If there were greater than 75% tes, Fisher's Exact Test was used. Fishers Exact Test was also used to evaluate necropsy data for the pups that were stillborn or found dead. Data obtained at Ceasarcansectioning, natural delivery, preweaning reflex/physical developmental data and postweaning behavorial data involving discrete data (numberof corpora lutea, numberofpups per liter, trials toa criterion) were evaluated by the Kruskal-Wallis Test.
Remarks~ Detail and discuss any significant protocol parameters and deviations:
Sce Table [Schema on page 1-4ofthe Report to be reproduced] for schematic description of study.
F, Generation:
Parental animals (F,) were observed twice daily for clinical signs. Body weights and food consumption values were recorded weekly during the treatment period in male rats; and weekly during mating and then daily during gestation, and on lactation days 1, 4,7, 10, 14, and at sacrifice in female rats.
Each dosage group consistedof two sets of female rats. One set consisted ofthe first ten female rats with confirmationofmating that were dosed until gestation day (GD) 10, sacrificed, and necropsicd to determine the number of corpora lutea, implantations, and number of viable and non-viable embryos. The remaining females comprised the second set, which delivered naturally. After the 21day gestation period, the dams were evaluated for clinical signs during parturition and length of gestation. During parturition each litter was evaluated at least twice daily for size and pup viability at birth. Pup observations during the 21-day lactation period included physical signs, body weights, nursing behavior, surface righting reflex, pinna unfolding, eye opening, acoustic startle response and air righting reflex. Pupil constriction was evaluated only on lactation day 21. On lactation day 4, litters were randomly culled to four male and four female pups. The remaining pups were sacrificed and necropsied.
`The F, male rats were sacrificed and necropsied after the end of dosing at the timeofparturition
(lactation day 1). The testes, epididymides, prostate, and seminal vesicles were weighed.
Evaluationsofsperm number, motility, and morphology were not included in the
rat nial sos Report Appeic
va
000331
protocol. `The F, generation females that delivered naturally were sacrificed on lactation day (LD) 21 and necropsied. Ovaries were examined as above and the number and distributionof implantation sites was recorded. The liver from each parental rat was removed, weighed and analyzed. Blood samples were collected from male rats that had mated and from female rats on LD 21 for pharmacokinetic analysis; livers from the pups from the litters of these five dams were also collected for analysis. `The final resultsofthese analyses were not available at the timeof this review. F, Generation: Since F, generation pup viability was significantly reduced in the 1.6 and 3.2 mg/kg/day dosages groups, only the 0.1 and 0.4 mg/kg/day dosage groups were carried into the second generation. `Twenty-five F, generation rats per sex per dose group were administered PFOS by gavage at dosesof 0, 0.1, and 0.4 mg/kg/day beginning on LD 22 and continuing through the day before sacrifice. At 24 daysofage, one rat per sex per liter in each dosage group was tested in a passive avoidance paradigm. On LD 28, female evaluations commenced to determine the age of vaginal patency and on LD 34, male rat evaluation commenced to determine the ageofpreputial separation. One rat per sex perlitterwas evaluated in a water-filled M-maze on LD 70. Assignment to cohabitation within each dosage group began on LD 90. Females with evidence of mating were considered to be at GD 0 and assigned to individual housing for the remainder of the dosing period. The F, generation male rats were sacrificed after mating necropsied and evaluated as described in the FO generation. All F, generation females were allowed to deliver naturally and raise liters until LD 21. Dams that delivered liters were sacrificed and necropsied onLD 21. All, generation pups were sacrificed, necropsied, and examined on LD 21 as previously described for the F, generation pups.
RESULTS `The results incorporate the findingsofthe original report and Final Report AmendmentI dated 13 April, 2000 submitted by the study director (RG York) and cosigned by the quality assurance `manager (NJ Gongliewski).
NOAEL for F,, F,, and F,: The NOAEL for the , generation males and females = 0.1 mg/kg/day, the lowest dose tested. The NOAEL for the F, generation = 0.4 mg/kg/day, the highest dose tested. The NOAEL for the F, generation = 0.4 mg/kg/day, the highest dose tested. ,
LOAEL (dose and effect) ~ for F., F,, and F,: The LOAEL for the F, generation males and females = 0.4 mg/kg/day, based on reductions in body weight gain and food consumption. The LOAEL for the F, generation = 1.6 mg/kg/day, based on significant reductions in the number of implantation sites, litter size, pup viability, growth and survival. A LOAEL for the F, generation was not established as 0.4 mg/kg/day, the highest dose tested, was the NOAEL.
Toxic response/effects by dose level and generation: Dra ntlAsset Ror ppendic
% Vaasg
000332
F, /F,. In F, generation rats reductions in both body weight gains and in absolute and relative food consumption occurred at the 1.6 and 3.2 mg/kg/day dosage groups during the pre-mating, period. Following mating, food consumption was significantly reduced in the 0.4. And 1.6 mg/kg/day dosage groups. Terminal body weights were also significantly reduced in the 1.6 and 3.2 mg/kg/day dose groups. There was no reproductive toxicity in the F, generation mals. `While significant reductions in the absolute weights of the seminal vesicles (with fluid) and the prostate were seen at the highest dose groupof3.2 mg/kg/day organ to body weight ratios were not significantly different from controls.. A significant increase in the number of males with brown liver at 3.2 mg/kg/day dose group was reported.
`The only findings reported in the F, dams occurred in the 0.4, 1.6, and 3.2 mg/kg/day dosage `groups and included localized alopecia during pre-mating, gestation, and lactation; and reductions in body weight and food consumption values observed during the pre-mating period and continuing throughout gestation and lactation. Significant reductions (p < 0.01) in gestation length, implantation sites, and liter size were observed at 3.2 mg/kg/day. Interestingly, reduction in implantation sites was not seen in the 10 rats sacrificed at DG 10.
In F, males; the only reported effects were significant reductions in absolute food consumption on postweaning days 1-8 occurring at the 0.1 and 0.4 mg/kg/day dose levels. F, females; observations at the 0.4 mg/kg/day dosage group included, reductions in body weights on day 1 postweaning, significant losses in body weight on LDs 1-4, and significant reductions in food consumption on days 1-8 postweaning and during lactation.
FF; Gestation length was significantly reduced at 3.2 mg/kg/day. Significant reduction in the number of implantation sites followed by a concomitant reduction in liter size was observed at 3.2 mg/kg/say. Other adverse signs in the 3.2 mg/kg/day dose level associated with reductions in pup viability and maternal care included liters with pups that were not nursing or who had no evidence of milk in the stomach, as well as maternal cannibalization of pups that were stillborn or found dead. Toxic effects in the F, generation pups consistedofreduced pup viability at the two highest dose groups (1.6 and 3.2 mg/kg/day). In the 3.2 mg/kg/day dose group 45% (71/156) of the pups were found dead on LDI; no pups survived beyond LD 4. In the 1.6 mg/kg/day dose `group, 10.6% (27/254)ofpups were dead on LD1; and an additional 26% (59/227 died between LD 2-4. Viability and lactation indices were significantly reduced in these same dosage groups (viability index = 0% at 3.2 mg/kg/day and 66% at 1.6 mg/kg/day; lactation index = 94.6% at 1.6 mg/kg/day). Statistically significant reductions in pup body weights were also observed at the two highest dosage groups.
"Toxic effects in the F, generation pups consistedoftransient reductions in mean pup body weights (on aper liter basis) observed at 0.1 mg/kg/day on LD 4 and 7. At 0.4 mg/kg/day, statistically significant reductions in mean pup body weights were observed on LDs 7-14.
Statistical results:
F, generation male animals: Significant reductions (p < 0.05 or p< 0.01) in body weight gains at
0.4 mg/kg/day and higher. Absolute and relative food consumption values were significantly
reduced (p< 0.05 or p< 0.01) in the 1.6 and 3.2 mg/kg/day dosage groups. A significant
increase (p < 0.01) in the number ofmale rats in the 3.2 mg/kg/day dosage group with brown
liver. The gross lesionsofthe liver were considered to be treatment related because the
rat nitsessmen Report Appenic V
vaso
000333
incidences were dosage-dependent. Significant reductions (p < 0.05 and p < 0.01) in terminal body weights were observed in the 1.6 and 3.2 mg/kg/day dosage groups. Significant reductions (p= 0.05 orp< 0.01) in the absolute weightsofthe seminal vesicles with fluid and the prostate were observed in the 3.2 mg/kg/day dosage group.
F, generation female animals: Significant increases (p < 0.05 or p < 0.01) in localized alopecia were observed in the 0.4, 1.6, and 3.2 mg/kg/day dosages groups. Significant reductions in body weight gains and food consumption (p < 0.05 orp < 0.01) were observed in the 1.6 and 3.2 `mg/kg/day dosage during premating and gestation and then in 0.4 mg/kg/day dosage group and above during lactation. Significant reductions (p < 0.01) in gestation length, implantation sites, and litter size was observed at 3.2 mg/kg/day.
F, generation offspring: Pup viability was significantly reduced (p < 0.05 or p < 0.01) in the 1.6 and 3.2 mg/kg/day dosage groups. At the doses significant increases (p < 0.05 orp < 0.01) were observed in the numberofdams with stillborn pups, while significant reductions (p < 0.05 or p < 0.01) were observed in the viability index, lactation index, and averages for surviving pups. A dosage-dependent pattemofreduced pup body weight was evident in each dosage group, with statistical significance (p < 0.01) in the 1.6 and 3.2 mg/kg/day dosage groups.
F, generation adult animals: Males - Significant reductions (<p 0.05 or p < 0.01) in absolute food consumption at 0.1 and 0.4 mg/kg/day; females - significant (p < 0.05) body weight loss on lactation days 1-4 at 0.4 mg/kg/day; and significant reductions (p < 0.05) in food consumption at 0.4 mg/kg/day on days 1-8 postweaning.
F, generation offspring: Pup body weights in the 0.4 mg/kg/day dosage group tended to be reduced, though not significantly, on lactation days 4-21, with significant reductions (p < 0.05 and p < 0.01, respectively) on lactation days 7 and 14, as compared to controls
Remarks -- Additional information to adequately assess the data:
F, Generation.
General toxicity. In male rats, there were no treatment-related clinical signsoftoxicity. Localized alopecia during pre-mating, gestation, and lactation were the only findings reported in some females in the 0.4, 1.6, and 3.2 mg/kg/day dosage groups. Mortality was not seen in cither sex. Reductions in male and female body weight gains and in absolute and relative food consumption occurred in the 1.6 and 3.2 mg/kg/day dosage groups throughout all phases of the study. Following mating, food consumption was significantly reduced in the male 0.4 mg/day dosage group. However, terminal body weight was different than control values only at the 1.6 and 3.2 mg/kg doses. Observations found at necropsy in females were unrelated to treatment. In males a brown discolorationofthe liver was seen in some rats gavaged with 3.2 mg/kg body weight PFOS.
Reproductive Toxicity. Male-related effects on mating or any fertility parameters evaluated were
not seen in any dose group. While a decrease in prostate and seminal vesicle weight was seen on
an absolute basis at 3.2 mg/kg, when expressed as an organ to body weight ratio it was not
significantly different from controls. This was interpreted as a generalized effect rather than a
rat nial ssssmens Report Appi
060334
specific effect on a reproductive organ. Evaluationof sperm number, motility or morphology was not part of the study protocol.
Estrous cycling, mating and fertility were similar among all groups. No statistically significant or biologically important differences in litter averages for corpora lutea, implantations, live and dead embryos were observed in the females examined on DG 10. However, a reduced number of implantation sites and litter sizes was noted, along with an increase in stillborn pups, in the 3.2 `mg/kg dose group that was partofthe main portionof the study. The gestation duration was also significantly reduced at this dose.
F, Generation
Developmental Toxicity. At the doseof3.2 mg/kg, 71/156 (45.5%) pups were found dead or presumed cannibalized on DL 1; the remaining pups died during DL 2-4. At the 1.6 mg/kg dose, 27/254 (10.6%) were found dead or presumed cannibalized on DL 1; an additional 59/227 (26%) died during DL 2-4. Viability index values demonstrate the steep natureofthe dose-response for pup mortality; values arc 98.7, 98.3, 98.3, 66.1 and 0.0% for the 0, 0.1, 0.4, 1.6 and 3.2 mg/kg dose, respectively.
A statistically significant (p < 0.01) reduced pup body weight was seen in the 1.6 and 3.2 `mg/kg/day dosage groups at birth. This effect persisted throughout the lactation period in the 1.6 mg/kg group. There was a tendency for slight reductions in body weight at the lower doses; these differences did not achieve statistical significance. A numberofbiological measures revealed delays in pup development during the lactation period in litters born ofmothers that received 1.6 mg/kg PFOS. These included surface righting reflex, pinna unfolding, eye opening, acoustic stare response, and air righting. The mean age at eye opening was also delayed at the 0.4 mg/kg dose; a transient delay in ageofpinna unfolding was also seen at this dose. Normal development was ultimately achieved for cach of these indices. At weaning the pups in the 1.6 mg/kg dose `group had gained 20% less weight than the controls and for humane considerations, it was determined that no further studies involving these rats would occur and they were cuthanized. `Twenty five cach, male and female F, rats commenced receiving daily gavage dosesof0, 0.1, 0.4 mg/kg PFOS at weaning. This dosing regimen continued through the growth and mating period in both sexes and in females through gestation and 21 days of nursing and lactation.
In the post-weaning period, ageofpreputial separation in males and attainmentof vaginal patency in females was similar in control and treated pups in the 0.1 and 0.4. mg/kg dose groups. `Two neurological tests were performed on one rat per sex per litter; passive avoidance at 28 days of age and a water-filled M maze at 70 days of age. No chemically related effects were observed.
Reproductive Performance. Body weight gain during the pre-cohabitation period was not significantly different from the controls. At 90 daysofage males and females were mated. After u`nmtaitlinDgLma2l1esatwwehriechkitlliemdeatnhdeynewcerroepskiieldl.edFeamndalneescrwoepsrieeda.llNooweedffteocltisttoernamnadtinnugrsaentdhefierrtyiloiutyng were observed. Body weight during gestation similar to thatof controls except for atransient decrease at DG 1-4 in the 0.4 mg/kg group. No toxicological findings were noted at necropsy.
F, Generation rat nial sess Report Appi
van
000335
No effect on litter size, numberoflive or stillborn pups were noted. Viability index was 97.1,
98.6,and 96.7 %in 0, 0.1, and 0.4 mg/kg dose groups, respectively. Evidence of treatment
related effects were confined to a statistically significant reduced mean body weight in the 0.4
`mg/kg group during unremarkable.
the
DL
7-14
period.
Clinical
and
necropsy
findings
in
the
F, pups
were
CONCLUSIONS
Comment on author's conclusions and whether you agree: Conclusions stated above and this reviewer agrees.
REFERENCE
Christian, M.S., Hoberman, AM. and York, R.G. 1999b. Argus Research Laboratories, Inc. Protocol Number: 418-008, Sponsor Study Number: 6295.9, June 10, 1999.
Final Report Amendment I dated 13 April, 2000. "Combined Oral (Gavage) Fertility, Developmental and Perinatal/Postnatal Reproduction Toxicity Study of PFOS in Rats'.
--------
van
000336
{ i mgerd
poms
foro
i
a
.
i
BE
T=
ROBUST SUMMARY - RS48
TITLE: Oral (Gavage) Cross-Fostering Study of PFOS in Rats
TEST SUBSTANCE
Identity: Perflourooctanesulfonate (PFOS) (FC-95)
Remarks: The test material was received on 21 October 1998 and stored at room temperature.
METHOD
Method/Guideline followed: The general guidelines of the FDA were followed. The objective ofthe study was to evaluate the survivalof F1 generation pups following PFOS treatment of FO
female during pre-mating, gestation, and lactation. F1 pups were cross fostered during the lactation period to differentiate effects on pups exposed to PFOS in utero and pups exposed to PFOS via maternal milk. Selected tissues were collected from the FO female rats and F1 pups and analyzed to determine the presence and amountof PFOS.
Females treated for 42 days with either 0 or 1.6 mg/kg bw/day PFOS were cohabitated with
untreated males. All pups ina litter were removed from their dams as soon as parturition was
completed and placed with a dam treated with eithe0r or 1.6 mg/kg PFOS. The cross-fostering procedure resulted in four groupsof either 12 or 13 dams & pups, i.c., pups from a control dam fostered on a control dam (CC), pups from a control dam fostered on a PFOS treated dam (CT), pups from a PFOS treated dam fostered on a control dam (TC) or, pups from a PFOS treated dam fostered on a PFOS treated dam (TT). Litters were normalized to 10 pups on DL 4.
GLP (Y/N): Yes. The cross-foster study was conducted in compliance with Good Laboratory Practice Regulationsof the US Food and Drug Administration, Japanese Ministryof Health and `Welfare, and the European Economic Community. The analytical analyses for PFOS were also conducted in compliance with FDA Good Laboratory Practices. There were no deviations from the GLP regulations that affected the quality or integrityofeither study.
Year study performed: 1998-1999
Species/Strain: Rat. Crl:CD BR VAF (Sprague-Dawley)
Number of animals per dose: Twenty five litters from control or treated dams were crossfostered with 12 or 13 control or treated dams; thus four treatment groups were established. In
addition, 2 and rats from the 0 and 1.6 mg/kg groups were allowed to keep their litters and `were used as a sourceofbiological specimens for determinationof PFOS levels in dams and pups on DL 14. Maternal serum, liver and mammary gland and pup serum and liver (pooled per
litter) were collected.
Route of administration: Oral (gavage)
ME
000338
Dosing regimen: Female rats were administered appropriate test material daily during a 42 day pre-cohabitation period and continuing through mating, gestation and a 21 day lactation period. Doses were selected based on the resultsof a 2-generation reproductive toxicity study performed using the same route and rat strain in the same laboratory. `Suspensionsofthe test material were prepared daily at concentrations of0 and 0.32mg/mL using 0.5% Tween 80 in reverse osmosis membrane processed deionized water. Doses: 0, 1.6 mg/kg bw/day Statistical methods used: Averages and percentages were calculated. Litter values were uscd where appropriate. Remarks - Detail and discuss any significant protocol parameters: Dayofbirth was designated as lactation day 1. Each liter was evaluated for viability twice cach day. Pup count and physical signs were recorded daily. Pup weights were recorded on DL 1, 4,7, 14 and 21. The lungs and livers were collected from the first 10 culled pups on DL 4 and preserved. On DL 21 six litters from eachofthe four cross-foster subsets had pooled litter samplesof liver and serum collected for possible analysis for PFOS. RESULTS `Toxic responses - maternal: All FO females survived to scheduled sacrifice. There were no clinical or necropsy observations attributed to PFOS administration. Absolute body weights were slightly reduced in the 1.6 mg/kg groups at the endof cohabitation and continued through gestation and lactation. Feed consumption was also reduced in the group throughout the study. Litter size at birth was slightly reduced in the 1.6 mg/kg group, 16.2 and 14.8 in the 0 and 1.6 mg/kg groups, respectively. Nuomfimbplaentatrion sites in the 1.6 mg/kg group was also reduced, 16.0 vs. 17.7 in control Toxic response -- pups: Pup mortality is summarised in the table below. It was increased in pups from treated dams that foster nursed control dams. Mortality was greatest in pups from treated dams that foster nursed treated dams. There were no differences in mortality in pups from control dams that foster-nursed treated dams when compared with pups from control dams that foster nursed control dams. PFOS exposure via maternal milk appeared to reduce pup body weight gain regardlessof in utero exposure to the chemical. For example, mean pup weight per litter was 29.0 (CC), 26.2 (CT), 26.7 (TC) and 24.6 (T'T) grams on DL 14. The greatest reduction in weight gain was in those pups exposed in utero and during lactation.
Evaluationoflivers from LDI pups from dams in the 1.6 mg/kg group revealed increased (2X) cneulmlbmeermsborfanpeersowxeirsoemneostwohbseenrveexd.amTiynpeed bIIypenleeuctmroocnymtiecsrwosecroepyin.crDeiafsfeedreinncensuminbemritaoschwoenrderitahle numberoflamellar bodies in samplesof lung.
ret iltscssmens por Append V
vais
000339
Cross-foster PFOS Study Postnatal Pup Effects During 21 Day Lactation Period
PFOS Exposure' Number Total Percent Litters Pup Gestation Lactation Dead Pups Mortality Affected Weight
0
0
3 9 16 302 200
0
16
2 181 20 201) 262
16
0
16 166 96 10011) 267
16
16 3 7 192 812) 246
# refers to daily female doseof 0 or 1.6 mg/kg PFOS. *mean weight in Grams on LD 14.
Additional information to adequately assess the data: Serum samples collected from dams and litters on scheduled day of necropsy (LD 21) have been analyzed for PFOS content and the resultsarepresented below. Other samples have not been analyzed. Pooled sera from liters born of control dams that were cross-fostered on control dams had values below the lower limit of detectionasdid their foster mothers. In contrast, pooled sera from liters bornoftreated dams who also foster nursed treated dams had values of 89.71 uG/mL, similar to their foster mothers and other treated mothers. Pooled sera from liters bornoftreated dams but who foster nursed control dams had values that were 60% (53.88 ug/mL)ofthe TT litters. Interestingly, their control foster mothers developed low sera values probably as a result ofgrooming their litters and coprophagy. Pooled sera from litters bomof control dams that foster-nursed treated dams had PFOS valuesof 22.35 ug/ml. indicating significant transfer of PFOS through milk. Considering pup viability data it is suggested that matemal sera levels in the rangeof 82-89 ug/L are associated with pup mortality.
Dra iilAsses Report ppenic
vig
000340
PFOS Values in Serum Collected From Dams and Pups at Time of Necropsy
Pup Exposure Regimen Gestation Lactation
Nursing Dams Mean
Litters Pooled Mean
Control Control
005" (12)
0.05" (6)
Control Treated
8296 (13)
2235 (6)
Treated Control
202 (13)
53.88 (6)
Treated Treated
8.97 (12)
8971 (6)
***0N.0u5mbueGr/miLn piasrLeonwtehresLeismiitsonfuQmubanetritoaftisoanm.ples
CONCLUSIONS In utero exposure to 1.6 mg/kg PFOS can cause postnatal pup mortality. Continued PFOS exposure in the postnatal period appears to have an additive effect on the incidenceofpostnatal pup mortality. At 1.6 mg/kg effects on maternal weight, implantations and liter size were similar 10 those observed in a prior 2 generation study. Significant quantities ofPFOS appear to be scereted in milk. The quantities secreted in milk can plausibly account for the additive mortality in pups exposed in utero and through lactation compared to mortality levels in pups solely exposed in utero. Sera levels in pups exposed to PFOS during gestation and lactation are equivalent to maternal values at time of weaning
Commenotn author's conclusions and whether you agree: Agree
REFERENCE Christian M, Hoberman AM & York RG. Argus Research Laboratories, July 23, 1999. Oral (Gavage) Cross-Fostering Studyof PFOS in Rats. Protocol 418-014 Sponsor Study T-6295.13 CD 00001108pdf
Hansen KJ, Perkins JR. 3M Environmental Laboratory, June 28, 1999. Analytical Laboratory
Report Report
on Determinationofthe PresenceofPFOS Number U2779. Sponsor Study T-6295.13
in
the
Serumof Sprague-Dawley
Rats.
Lab
Nold JM. Pathology Associates Intemational, April 5, 1999.
------
Vass
000341
ROBUST SUMMARY - RS49
Title: Ninety day subacute rat toxicity study
TEST SUBSTANCE
Identity: N-EtFOSE alcohol
Remarks: Lot FM-03422 41d-2700-3422-0 Lot 784/ Net-35 DR-1
METHOD
Method/guideline: Not listed
Study duration: 90 days
GLP: No, prior to start of GLP
Year study performed: 1978
Species/Strain: Rat; Charles River CD
Route of administration: Oral, diet
Doses tested and frequency: 100, 300, 1,000, 3,000 and 10,000 ppm in initial (11/4/1977) trial, an addition 30 ppm group initiated 11/25/1977 in accordance with an approved protocol modification. Treated feed available ad lib.
Sex: Male and female
Control group and treatment: Purina Laboratory Chow (ground basal dict) Post exposure observation period: none
Statistical methods: Analysis of variance (1-way classification), Bartlett=s test for homogeneityofvariances, and the Aappropriate t-test (for equal or unequal variances) as described by Steel and Torrie, using Dunnett=s multiple comparison tables to judge significance ofdifferences
Remarks:
Test Subjects:
Age at study initiation: not specified
`Weight at study initiation: 240-306 g (male); 180-226 g (female)
No. of animals per sex per dose: 5
Study Design:
Vehicle: Purina lab chow
Satellite groups and reasons they were added: none
Clinical observations performed and frequency: Animals observed twice daily for duration of
trial. Body weight, food consumption, gross behavior, eyes, nose, mouth.
eOyregsa,nhseaertxa(wmiitnhecdoraotnnaercyrovpesssye:ls)A.drDeunoadlse,nuamor,tai,lbeoumn,e,jebjruainnum(,wictohlosne,gkmiednnteoyfs,cleirvveirc,allucnogr,d)
thymus, mammary gland, nerve (with muscle) spleen pancreas, prostate/uterus, bone marrow
J --------
Yoosez
(sternum) salivary gland, spinal cord (lumbar) pituitary, stomach, testes/ovaries,thyroid, parathyroid, urinary bladder, mesenteric lymph node, and any other tissues with abnormalities. RESULTS NOAEL (NOEL) 30 ppm NOAEL/LOEL (because of lackofstatistical significance and additionof 30 ppmgrouppost hoc) LOAEL (LOEL) 100 ppm LOAEL
Remarks: Body weight:
e ee w. w me] Ts wor| wen |
Food/water consumption:
Dose (ppm)
Toaww
| Average Food Consumption (g/ratday)
mew] ET
Femile
we
"Statisticallysignificant relative contolap001,
Clinical signs (description, severity, timeof onset and duration):
ii a
boon
l[iommeornT [+T TwT Tw |owT J wow[| T oww w[]om [vespome|]TT] +]
fempen ]T--T55]|
=--T
;
im
Netw |TT5|T 5]
Haematology: For rats at the 30 and 100 ppm dosage at 1 and 3 months of study, and for rats treated at 300 ppm at 1 month, all hematological levels were within the expected range. 3w`meornethsteatriystthircoalclyytesicgonuinftisc,anhtleymolgolwoerbirnelaantidvehetmoactoonctrroilts.vaAllulesotfhoerrmhaelmeataonldofgeimcavlaelruaetss water3e00noPtP
significantly different from controls at the conclusionof thestudy.
Biochemistry: Statistically significant responses (see table): Glucose elevaled in female rats at 300 ppm; BUN elevated in males at 300 ppm; Alkaline phosphatase elevated in males and females at 300 ppm; PGOT decreased in males at 100 ppm, but not at 300 ppm. PGPT elevated
in males at 300 ppm. No compound related changes noted in urinalysis
Slewlawlaw]o]
I
ws000344
[Frermem|CelaTmweeTlouelel=elne|] Summaryof Biochemistry Results from 90 Day Study
]
1
IB
6
2
Creatine
| Pretest
| prosphokinsse 1
25
6
20 8
5
6
5
9 10
13
[catciummeat,| pretest
02 | 98 | 75 | 77 | 107 | 97 | 07 | 9s
|
Si, PG=PplaTsma glutamic pyruvic mansaminase
PGOT = plasma glutamic oxalacete transaminase
hmoechng
`Mortalityand time to death: (see table below. Time to death not reported).
rarer --
I tiem
|| ve000345
IEE Loo |ow [ow]
[oo | wo [ow]
Gross pathology incidence andseverity: Liver Lesions: All rat treated at 300 ppm exhibited compound-related gross liver lesions, occurring singly or in combination. Changes included liver enlargement, accentuated Iobulations, diffuse brown discoloration and gray/yellow/white areasofdiscoloration. Males appears to be more severely affected than females. Similar but less severe liver lesion observed in animals from the 100, 1,000, and 3,000ppm groups. Stomach: Compound related gross lesions including hyperemia/congenstion, red/brown foci/hemorrhage in the some animals receiving 1,000, 3,000, or 10,000 ppm. Organ weight changes: Liver: Statistically significant increase in absolute and relative liver weights in 100 and 300 ppm groups, with males more severely affected than females. Other organs: statistically significant variations observed at 100 and 300 ppm, without `morphological changes (see table).
ref niasss ReposAppend
vas
000346
[ooame Towwno[wsoJ[woasenJ[ceommss[[ro=o]]
[[oromaarrsams| 0 0 | [roismeerJeoeeJ[oooor]]
Histopathology:
Liver: Microscopic alteration observed in livers from all treated groups consisting ofvery slight to marked centrilobular to pan-lobular hepatocytic hypertrophy in 30, 100, 300, and 1,000 ppm groups. Hepatocytic hyperplasia observed in the 3,000 and 10,000 ppm groups. Very slight to moderate increase in lipid-containing cytoplasmic vacuoles at 100 and 300 ppm. Focal to
multifocal coagulative centrilobular to midzonal hepatocellular necrosis of very slight to marked
severity observed in 300, 1,000, 3,000 and 10,000 groups. Minimal amount of associated
hienpfaltaomcmyatteosryanidnfKilutprfafteerobcseelrlsveodb.sIenrcvreedasperdimianrtirlaycyatto3p0la0smpipcm.accKuulpuflfaetirocnoelflsbsrtoaiwnnedpipgosmietnitvse
in
for
iron; hepatocytes did not.
Kidneys: Most animals in the 300 ppm group exhibited very slight to marked tubular nephrosis with associated proteinaceous cast formation, and intracellular accumulationof brown pigment
(staining positive for iron) and reddish-brown hyaline droplets in tubular epithelial cells. Mineralizationof luminal tubular debris observed in some rats.
Other tissues: Lesions in other tissues were not considered compound-related.
CONCLUSIONS
30 ppm Slightly depressed weight gain compared to controls. Significant increase in y-GTP in
`males and females, but no dose-dependence.
100 ppm Reduction in body weight for both sexes; depressed food consumption in females, one
female rat demonstrated behavioral change. Statistically significant liver weight increase.
300
and
ppm
food
2 premature
consumption
deaths in females following blood collection.
were significantly lower. Hematologic values
Group mean
(erythrocyte
body`weights
count,
`hemoglobin and hematocrit were slightly but statistically significantly lower than controls.
Changes observed in biochemical values (e.g., alkaline phosphatase, PGPT, PGOT, y-GTP and
BUN). Gross liver lesions observed. Statistically significant liver weight increase; changes in
kidneys observed.
beter Se Remarks: Although old, study appears to have been well conducted and results well reported.
It clearly would have benefited from having a range-finding study. Some concem about post hoc. addition of 30 ppm group, and the lackofan additional control group entering at the same time,
which makes
dose spacing
it
to
difficutlot rely wholeheartedly on
the next exposure level was 3-fold
the effects noted
and not 10-fold,
at
it
30 ppm. Given that the
is not inappropriate to
consider 30 ppm a NOEL, and 100 ppm a LOAEL. REFERENCE International Research and Development Corporation. 1978. Ninety day subacute rat toxicity study on FM-3422. IRDC Study No. 137-086. Final Report, November 10, 1978.
Draftsessment Report Appenic
Vass
000348
ROBUST SUMMARY- RS50
`Title: Ninety Day Subacute Rhesus Monkey Toxicity Study. TEST SUBSTANCE
Identity: N-E(FOSE alcohol
Remarks: FM-3422 41-2700-3422-) Lot 784/Net-35 DR-1 METHOD
Method/guideline: Nonespecified Test type: 90 day gavage GLP: None specified
Year: Study performed in 1978; final report 1979 Species: Monkey
Strain: Rhesus
Route of administration: oral gavage
Doses/concentration levels: 1,3, 10, 30 mg/kg/day Sex: Male and female
Exposure period: 90 days Frequency of treatment: daily
Control group and treatment: propylene glycol Post exposure observation period: none Duration of test: 90 days
oStfavtairsitiacnaclesm,eatnhdodtsh:e AAanpaplryospirsioatfevarti-taenscte(f(o1r-ewqauyalcloarssuinfeiqcautailonv)a,rBiaarntcleest)t=ass dteesstcfroirbehdomboygSetneeeilty
and Torrie, using Dunnett=s multiple comparison tables tojudge significanceofdifferences.
Remarks: On days thereafter,
days 2 ml
1 and 2of was used.
study, test material Controls mirrored
was dissolved in treatment groups.
5
ml
propylene
glycol;
on
all
Test Subjects:
Age at study initiation: Not specified Weight at study initiation: males: 3.04.35 kg; females 3.05-4.20 kg No.ofanimals per sex per dose: 2 Study Design:
Vehicle: propylene glycol
Satellite groups and reasons they were added: none
bCleihnaivciaolroabnsderpvhaatrimoancsotpoexrifcosrimgensd. aInnddifvrieduqaulenbcoyd:y wtweiicgehtdsairleycoforrdegdenweereakllpyh;ysgiecnaelraalpppheyasriacnacle,
ref nia Assn Report Append
vase
000349
oexnacmeipnraitoirotnostmhoenbtehgliynndiunrgionfg stthuedey.xpeHreimmaetnotl,ogaincdala,t b1iaoncdhe3mimcoanlthasnodfusrtiunadl.ysis were conducted
Organs examined at necropsy: brain, eyes, thyroid/parathyroid.
heart, liver, adrenals, spleen, pituitary, kidneys, testes/ovarics,
RESULTS
NOAEL (NOEL): 10 mg/kg/day LOAEL (LOEL): 30 mg/kg/day Remarks:
ofBosdtyudwyeiagllhtt:heDmuorniknegytshweefriresat tmoonrthn,eaarllthmeoonrkiegiynsalinbcolduydiwnegicgohnttreoxlcsepltostfowreitghhet.groAutps1r2ewceeievkisng
`1w0eiagnhdt l3o0ssmgw/aksg/odbasye.rvAeldthfoorugahnyongeromuopnaktetyheschoonwceludsaiowneoifgthhteloesxsp,enroimsetnatti.stically significant
Food/water consumption: Food consumption was cstimated.
tChleinsitcuadly,siagllnsth(edemsocnrkiepytiso,n,inscelvuedriintgy,cotnitmreoolsf, osnhsoewteadnsdlidguhrtattoiomna)r:keOdndeacnrdeaasfeteirntahcetsiveictoy,nd day
ataxia, glycol
and was
raneodruecxeida.frTohme5attoax2iamld/iskagpopneasrteuddyfrdoamy
all 3.
tSheevmeroanlkweeyeskasftienrtothteheamsotuudnyt,osftpoorlopylene
ocbhsaenrgveesdwienrmeoosbtseorfvtehde imnotnhkeemyosnkferyosm,cwaicthhgbroluapc.k sTtowolo,omfutchuesmaonndkeblyosordeycemiuvciungs3i0n tmhge/kstgo/odlay
had these symptoms persist for mostofthe treatment period.
Haematology: mg/kg/day exhibited
a
No unusual changes observed slight decrease in hematocrit,
for blood. One monkey receiving 10 hemoglobin and erythrocyte counts at
1
`month ofstudy that was ot observed at 3 months.
Biochemistry: Glucose: lower range of expected values.
Most
ofthe
monkeys
exhibited
blood
glucose
values
in
the
2Chmoloenskteeryosl:re1cemiovninkge3y0rpecpemivsinhgow1e0dmgl/okwgc/hdoalyes(tesrhoolwveadluaelso(w56chaonldes6te7romlg/l1ev0e0lm(l8,4 amlgs/o1w0i0tmhl)l;ow
potassium (3.5 meq/L)).
Ophthalmologic findings: None reported.
tMhoertsatuldiyt.y aDneadthtiwmaestoprdeecaetdhe:d Obynea mmoarnkkeedylroescseoifvbiongd3y0wmegi/gkhgt/(d1a.y25dikegd)dwuirtihngattahxeialaasntdwaeek of
marked decrease in activity. All other monkeys survived until sacrifice
Gross pathology incidence and observed at the endofthe study.
severity:
No
gross
lesions
considered
compound-related
were
aOnrdgabrnaiwneiinghatnicmhaalnsgetrse:ateSdtaattis1t0icaalnldy 3si0gnmigf/ikcga/ndtavya.riaNtoionmsoripnhsoelxoggircoaulp cmheaanngewseiwgehrtesoofblsievrevred
in these organs relative to control.
Dra iilAsses Report Append
vast
000350
Te
=
fr | 0 D (mg/kg/day) oJoe Joe oo]
[on[00 I5o oomwer relative JJoomnmee 0oo]]
Histopathology:
1,3, or 10 mg/kg/day: No changeswereobserved in tissues.
30 mg/kg/day: One male and two females exhibited slight to severe lipid depletion in adrenal gcellalndssi.ze Tanwdolfoessmoaflzesymexohgibeintegdramnoudleesr.atOenaetrpoapnhcyorefatshaelspoahncardeasteivecreaxloecorsiinneocpehlillsi,cwiintthradneuccrleeaasre
inclusions in the exocrine cells. No changes in tissues other than the adrenal glands and pancreas were considered compound-related.
CONCLUSIONS
Clear NOEL and LOEL can be derived from this.study.
Remarks: Old, but generally well-conducted study. Some concerns about effectof vehicle, due
etxoaGcIersbyamtipotnoomfssiynmapltl oamnsim.als, although there does appear to be a compound-related
REFERENCE
International Research and Development Corporation. 1979. Ninety Day Subacute Rhesus Monkey Toxicity Study, on FM-3422. IRDC Study No. 137-088. Final Report, January 16, 1979.
OR
--
ROBUST SUMMARY - RSS1
TPietrlfel:uo1r0oo4c-tWaeneeksuDlifeotnaarmyidCoarEctihnaongoelniicniRtaytsS.tuSdyUwMitMhANRarYroRwERPanOgRe-T(9W8.E1E%)KN-5E3thylTEST SUBSTANCE
Identity: N-Ethyl Perflurooctanesulfonamido Ethanol (N-EtFOSE alcohol) cRoemmpaoruknsd:sTest substance is Anarrow range, consistingof98.1% N-EFOSE plus other related
METHOD
Method/guideline: None Test type: 104 week oral toxicity study (Week 53 Interim Report) GLP: Yes
`Year: Not specified (Study start date: January 26, 1998)
Species/Strain: Rat; Crl:CD'(SD)IGS BR
Route of administration: Oral (in chow)
Doses/concentration and 1 ppm N-EFOSE
levels: 0, 3, 30,100, 300 alcohol added at a ater
ppm date)
N-E(FOSE
alcohol
(Additional
doses
of0
Sex: Male & Female
Exposure period: 104 weeks (53 week interim)
Frequency of treatment: ad libitum
Control group and treatment: Concurrent vehicle:
Post exposure observation period: At least 52 weeks following 52 weeksofexposure
Duration of test: 104 weeks (53 week interim)
Statistical methods: Not specified in Week 53 Summary Report
Remarks:
Test Subjects: Age at study initiation: 6-8 weeks
Weight at study initiation: 100-300 g
No. per
of animals per sexper dose: sex in 30 ppm dose group, 70
70 per sex per sex in
in control group, 60 per 100 ppm dose group, 70
sex per
in 3 sex
ppm dose group, in 300 ppm dose
60
group, 40 per sex in 100 in 1 ppm dose group, 70
ppm recovery group, per sex in additional
c4o0ntpreorlssefxoritnh3e010ppppmmdroesceovgerroyupg.roup,
70
per
sex
Study Design:
Vehicle: Chow
Satellite groups andreasons they were added: Not specified in Weck 53 Summary Report
Cdlaiinliyc(aalmobasnedrvpamt).ionEspaecrhfaonrimmaeldwaansd frreemqouveendcyf:roOmbsceargveeadndforexmaomribnideidtoyn/mcoerpirbiuonrdtiotytrtewaitcmeent
ET --------------
vas
000352
oanncdeoenvceerywe4ckwleyektshertehaefrteearf.ter.FooBdodcyonwseuimgphttisownedraetadewteerremicnoelldewcteeedklfoyrfWoereWkesek1sth1rtohurgohug1h6 a1n7d uarnidneonccheemeivsetrryy,4awnedeukrsintahleyrseiasflwere.reBcloololdecatnedd furrionme$saamnpilmealssfpoerrhesmexationltohgey,cocnltirnoilcaalncdhehmiigshtry, gdroosuepgrdouurpisngdWureienkgsW1e4e,k278, aanndd f53r.omB1l0ooadniamnadlsurpienresseaxmpinletshefo1rphpemmadtoosleogayn,dcslienciocnald control scehxemiinsttrhye,cuonrtirnoel,ch3e,mi3s0,trayn,dur1i0n0alpyspims, daonsde sgerrouumpssdaumrpilnigngWeweerkes c1o4l,le2c7t,edanfdro53m. 10Blaonoidmaslasmppelres `foWrecsker4u;mfranoaml5ysaensiwmearles pcoelrlseecxteidnftrhoemcoSntarnoilm,a3l,s3p0e,r1s0e0x,iannadll3b0u0tptphemrdeocsoevegrryougrposudpusridnugring a`nWdecfkr8o;mf5raonmi$maalnsimpaelrsspeexrisnetxheinboaltlhbcuotnttrhoelhgirgohudpos,sethaend1,raencdovtehrey1g0r0oupppsmdudroisneggWreouepks 1d4u;ring Week 53.
fToelrlmoiwniantgitoinmescihnetderuvlael:s:5 Waneiemkal4s:pAelrlsgerxouwpesrebnuectrhoeprseiceodveforrytghreoufposl;loWwienegkg8r:ouCposntarotlheand 300
ppm dose groups; Week 14: Both control groups, 1, 3, 30, and 100 ppm dose groups.
During Week the additional
53, ive control,
atnhiem1a,lasnpderthseex10f0ropmpmthedoisnietigarlocuopnstrwoelrgeroneucproapnsdie1d0.animals
per
sex
from
eNfOfeTcEts:sDeuernifnogr Wboedcykw8e,igthhte,30fo0opdpcmondsousmeptgiroonu,psanwdercelinriecmalovpeadthforloomgytahendsttuhdeyrbeemcaaiunsienogfhtiogxhic
dose non-recovery concurrent control
animals were discarded without group were subsequently added.
necropsy.
The
1
ppm
dose
group
and
its
Organs examined at necropsy:
lOurngga,novwaeriyg,hts:plAetenW,eteeskte4s,,otnhlyyrotihde/plairvaetrhwyaroside,vaalnuadtoevda.rieWse.ekWe8:eAkd1r4e:naFlo,rbcroanitnr,olk,id3n,e3y0s,, alinvder1,00
ppaprmathdyorsoeidg,roaunpds,ovaadrrieensalwse,rberaeixna,mkiindende.ys,Folrivetrh,elaudndgi,tioovnaarly,cosnptlreoeln,antedst1esp,ptmhydrooisdewgirtohups, only
the liver was evaluated. thyroid/parathyroid, and
Week 53: ovaries.
Adrenal,
brain,
kidneys,
liver,
lung,
ovary,
spleen,
testes,
cMoircdr,oskcidonpeiyc,elxiavemri,ntathiyomnu:s,AtlyWmepehkn4o,doensl(ymtehseenltievreircw,amsanedvailbuualtaerd., meWdeieaskti8n:aEl)y,e,spblreaeinn,, spiptiuniatlary,
aWdereenkal1,4: stFoomraccohn,trdoul,od3e, n3u0m, ,ajnedju1n0u0mp,ppmandcorseeasg,roeuppisd,ideyymei,dbersa,int,eskteisd,neoyv,arliievse,r,vmaegisnean,teurteircus,
1lypmppmh dnoosdeesg,rsopulpese,n,liavderrewnaals,epxaanmcirneeads., teesteesk, o5v3a:riEeyse,,vbargaiinna,,suptienrauls.corFdo,rkaidddnietyi,onlailvecro,ntlrunogl,and
thheayrrto,idfewmietrh bpaornaethwyirtohidm,artrraocwh,eas,teesmopuhmagbuosn,eswailtivhamryargrloanwd,s,skhealretdaelrimaunscgllean,ds,ctiahtyimcunse,rvley,mph
sntoodmeasc(hm,esceonltoenr,irce,cmtaudmi,bduluaord,enmeudmi,asjteijnuanlu,ml,umiblaeru/mi,lpaacn)c,rsepalse,enb,lapdidteuri,tasrkyi,na,dmreanmalm,acreycugml,and,
prostate, seminal vesicles, epididymides, testes, ovaries, cervix, vagina, uterus, tail
oCorlglaencwteedigohrtgsanwserweerneotalrseocoerxdaemdiannedd lmiavcerrossacmoppliecsalwlye.reUnnostcchoeldleuclteedd.deaths were necropsied, but
Additional Endpoints:
Dra nilAsset Report Append
vaso
000353
Proliferation Cell Nuclear Antigen (PCNA) evaluation
Mitochondrial control, 3,30,
analyses: 100, and
Liver samples collected 300 ppm dose groups.
from
animals
sacrificed
during
Week
4
from
the
Palmitoyl-CoA oxidase analyses
RESULTS
NOAEL (NOEL): Week 53 Interim Report: 3 ppm
LOAEL (LOEL): Week 53 Interim Report: 30 ppm (decreased cholesterol levels)
Rpepmmahrakds:sigBniofdiycawnetliyghlto:weArftbeordtyhewefiirgsthtwseceokmofptarreeadtmtoencto,ntraonlism.alAsngiimvaelnsdionsethseof301p00pmord3o0s0e
gstraotuisptihcaaldlylsoiwgenrifbiocdanytwuenitiglhtasppcroomxpiamraetedltyoWceonetkrol8.s, Bbuotdythweediifgfhesroefnaceniwmaaslnsotingetnheera1lolry3 ppm
dToowseergfroorupasniwmearles niontthseig3ni0f0icpapntmlyddoisfefegrreonutpfsrwohmecnonctroomlps.arBedodtyo cwoenitgrhotlsgabiengiwnansinsgiginniftihceanfitrlsyt
wweeiegkhotfgatirne;atmfoerntt.he A3n0ipmaplmsdionstehegr1o0u0p,pcphmandgoessewgerroeupsspofrraedqiuceanltllyyshiagndifsiicgannitf.icOanvtelryalllowcehranbgoedy
in body weight (Week 1 ppm dose groups. Body
to Week 53) was significantly weight gainofanimals in the
lower 1 or 3
than ppm
controls for dose groups
the was
100 not
and
the
30
significantly different from controls.
Ffoooodd/cwoantseurmpctoinosnumcpotmipoanr:edAntiomcaolnstrionlsthseta1r0ti0nganidn t3h0e0fprsptmwdeoeskeofgrtoreuaptsmehnatd,sigSntiafritcianngtilny Wloeweekr
3i,ntmearvlaelss iwnhtehne 3co0mpppamreddostoecgornoturoplhaandimaanlsu.mbTehriosfesfifgenctifwiacasntnloyt loobwseerrvfeododfocrotnhseufmepmtailoens in the
same dose group, nor for the animals in the 1 and 3 ppm dose groups.
Test Material Consumption: The following consumed by animals on a mg/kg/day basis:
table
summarizes
the
amountof
test
material
raf ni sss Report Append
vast
000354
Cm
Achieved Dose Levels - Range (mg/kg/day)
ere owaw
Clinical signs (description, severity, timeof onset and duration): There were no apparent test
material-related observation noted through Week 53.
Hematology: At a dose levelof 300 ppm for approximately 8 weeks, administrationofN-
EtFOSE alcohol was associated with hematological effects, including lower red blood cell count, `hemoglobin, and hematocrit. Mostofthe effects were moderate to marked in magnitude.
`Dcioeutnta,ryheamdmoignliosbtirna,tiaonnod fheNm-atEotcFriOtSEforalfceomhaollewsaisn
tahseso1c0ia0tpedp`mwidtohsmeilgdrloyupdse.crNeoaseefdfercetds
blood
were
cell
seen for the 1 and 3 ppm dose groups.
Clinical Chemistry: At a dose level of 300 ppm for approximately 8 weeks, administration of N-
gEltoFbuOlSinE,waansd acshsoolceistaetreodl,wiatnhdmhainghyerefufreectasnointrcolgienni,caallbcuhmeimni,sttroytarlebsiulltisr,ubiinncl(umdailnegs loonwlye)rg,lucose,
aspartate aminotransferase (males only), and alanine aminotransferase. Mostof the effects were `moderate to marked in magnitude.
Mildly lower glucose and
(predominantly at Weeks
`mildly
14 and
higher urea
27). Males
gniivternoge1n00wapspmobwseerreveodbsfoerarvneidmatolshagvievemnod1e0r0atpeplmy
higher albumin and moderately lower globulin (predominantly at Weeks 27 and 53). Males
given 30 or 100ppm and females given 100ppm had moderately to `markedly lower cholesterol.
No effects were seen for the 1 and 3 ppm dose groups.
Ophthalmologicfindings: Not performed
`Mortality andtimeto death: Two males and 2 females given 1 ppm, 2 males given 3 ppm, one
`male and one female given 30 ppm, 6 males and one female given 100 ppm, 4 males given 300
ppm, and a total of8 control animals died on test or were sacrificed `moribund. Oneof the males
given
undet
3 ppm was
ermined for
sacrificed
one male
due to a fractureofthe
given 100ppm and one
hard palate.
male given
The causeof death was
300 ppm. Histopathology
w
as
not performed on animals from the I ppm dose groups; the macroscopic findings were typical of
those observed in rats in long term studies. All ofthe other treated animals that died or were
000355
sacrificed at
to treatment
unscheduled
with the test
intervals
material,
ohradbo`thhe.paOtfoctuhlleuslearanhiympaelrst,rtohpehy3
or `hepatocellular
ppm dose group
necrosis due
male was
msaaclreifainceddobneeca3u0seppomfadolasregegrsouubpcufteamnaeloeusweurnedisfafcerriefnitcieadtemdorsiarbcuonmda,wiotnhep3it0u0itparpymaddeonsoemgarso,up
hepatocellular ppm, and one
necrosis 100 ppm
dwoassetghreocuapusmeaolfeddeiaetdhwifotrh2nemcarloessisogifvetnhe1m0u0spcuplmataunrdeo3ftmahleesanguisv,en
300
The following table summarizes the survival data for the 53 week interimreport:
en [ree] omll aene Taw m] oomm] weoo wwee] ome |oe
Gross pathology incidence and severity: Week 4: No gross findings.
lWieveerkwa8:sEonblsaerrgveeddliinveornsewefreemafloeu(n3d0i0npapllmoftdohsee `gmraolueps).andTh2eorfetwheerefenmoaloetshearnadb`nmoorttmlailng of the `macroscopic findings. Week 14: No gross findings.
Week 53: No grossfindings.
Organ weight. changes:
Week 4: Absolute
dose groups.
and
relative
liver
`weights
were
higher
for
animals
in
the
100
and
300ppm.
dWoeseekgr8:ouApbs(oolnultyetraenadtmreelnattigvreoulipveerxawmeiingehdt)s.weTrheerseigwniefriecannotloythhiegrhteerstfomrataenriimaal-lrseliant3ed00chpapnmges
for absolute or relative organ weights.
Week 14:
ppm dose
gArbosuopl,utbeutannodtrfeolratainveimlailvesrfwreoimghtthse
were
1, 3,
significantly higher for
or 30 ppm dose group.
animals from the 100
There were no other
test material-related changes for absolute or relative organ weights.
J Boose Week 53:
ppm dose
gArbosuopl,utbeutannodtfroerlaatniivemlailvserfwreoimghtthse w1eprpesmigdnoisfiecgarnotulpys.higThheerrefowrearneimnaolsotfhreormtetshte
100
material-related changes for absolute or relative organ weights. Histopathology:
Wtheeelkiv8e:rsoHefpaantoicmealllsulfarrohmytpheert3r0o0phpyp, mhedpoasteocgerloluulpa.r
necrosis, and hemorrhage were Other findings unremarkable.
observed
for
Week given
14: 100
Hpeppma.tocOetlhleurlafrinhdyipnegrsturnorpehmyawrakasboleb.served
for
males
given
30
or
100
ppm
and
females
pWpemekdo53s:e Hgreopuapt.oceHlelpualtaorcehlylpuelratrrnoepchryosainsdwvaascuooblsaetriovnedweforreoonbesemravleedafnodr a2nfiemmaallsefsrformotmhteh1e01000
pOpnmed1o0s0epgpromupdsosaendgroonuepmfaelmealaenhda2d faehmeaplaetsocferlolmultahrea1d0e0nopmpam, dwohsiechgraoruepocecxahsiibointaeldlbyiloebsstearsivse,d
as an incidental finding in 1 year old rats. Other findings unremarkable.
Additional Endpoints:
`PrSoulmimfearraytiRoenpCoerltl (NauncalleysairsApnetrifgoernm(edPCbNyAS)poenvsaolura)tion: Results not provided in Week 53
Mitochodrial by Sponsor)
analyses:
Results
not
provided
in
Week
53
Summary
Report
(analysis
performed
PEa(lFmOiStEoyall-cCoohAoloxwiadsasaessaoncailaytseeds:wiAtth tmhieldWley,ekbu4t astnadtiWsteiceaklly8ssiagcnriiffiiccaenst, hadimgihneirshterpaattiiocnpoaflNmi-toylCoA oxidase activity in the animals given 300 ppm.
CONCLUSIONS
CchhorloensitcerdoiletinarryatesxaptoasudroesetolNev-eEltoFfO3S0Epaplmcoahonld wabaosvea.ssoHceipaatteodcweiltluhldaerchryepaesretdrloepvheylsaonfd other threepaattmoecnetl-lruellaarteefdfeecftfsecwtesrweeroebsoebrsveerdveidn aatniamnalesxpforsoumrethleev3e0l oanf3d 1p0p0mp.pm dose groups. No
REFERENCE
CRoavnagnec(e98L.ab1o%r)atNo-rEitehsylI-ncP.erfNlouoDratoeo.cta1n0c4s-uWlefeoknaDmiiedtoarEythCaanrocliniongReantisc.itSy UStMuMdyAwRitYh RNaErPrOowRT WEEK 53. Prepared for 3M. COVANCE STUDY NUMBERS: 6329-212 and -228.
[ --------
Vaiss
000357
--
ROBUST SUMMARY - RS52
Title: Oral (Gavage) Pharmacokinetic Recovery Study of PFOS in Rats (1999) TEST SUBSTANCE
Identity: Perfluorooctylsulfonate, potassium salt (FC-95), CAS 2795-39-3 Remarks: Purity 98.9%, Lot #217
METHOD
Method/guideline followed: GLP, FDA, EEC
Test type: in vivo
Species/strainicell type or line: rat/Sprague-Dawley/pregnant Crl:CD(R)BR VAF/Plus(R) Sex: Fo: female, Fl: both
Age and body weight range of animals used: 65 days, 192-231 g Number of animals/sex/dose: Fo: 8, F1: 5 male and female pups/ltter Routeof administration: oral
Vehicle: 0.5% Tween(R) 80 in R.0. deionized water, dosage volume ml/kg
Dproisoerst:o c0oh(vaebhiitcaltei)o,n0u.n1tialncdon1.f6irmmge/dkge/vdiadyenicnevooflmuamteinog.fSOmnilkyg,thoenFcoe fdeaimlaylebsegwienrneindgos4ed3.days
Excretion routes, body fluids, Fo urine, feces, serum, liver. F1
and tissues monitored liver and serum.
and/or
sampled
during
study:
Statistical methods used: averages and percentages
Minetterhvoalds:roenmeardkasy:prUirorinteo ainnidtifaetciaolnosfamcpolheabsiwteatrieoncotloletchteedfoflrloowmiFnOg mfoemmailneg,ratdsafyosr6thteo f7o,l1l4owtiong (15D,LSa)nd2120toto222.1oBflporoedsusammepdlegseswteatrieonco(lDleGcste6d tforo7,m 1e4acthoof15t,haendma2t0ertnoa2l1)r,atasnodndtahyesdofalyactation csouhravbiivtiantgiroantswaasssiinginteidatteod t(phreiosrtutdoycwoeharbeitsaatciroifni)c,eDd Gosn D7,L1522.andA2l1i,vearnsdeDctLison1w4aasncdol22l.octAeldlfrom cach dam. aDnadyf1iovfelfaecmtaalteiopnupwsaspedrefliitneerd, awshetrheedpaosysoibflbei.rthO.nODnLD2L1,4a,lllirtetemrasiwneirnegcpuulplsedwteorefisvaecrmiafliecedp.ups rTehfe nliiavlerAsfsrcsommencsRaecphorptuAppwpeansdcollected and pooled per litter. Blood samples were collVecatsesd and
000358
pooled per liter. UOrnindea,ysfec1al1,0 s4eorfutmhean4d3-lidvaeyr spraemmpalteisnwgepreerisohdi,pFpeodfteomatlhee Sraptosnrseecreifvoerdan2a5ly%sigsreater dose due to an incorrect calculated amountoftest substance in vehicle,
RESULTS
Detailed results: PK results not final.
Metabolites measured: none
CONCLUSIONS
REFERENCE
OLraabolra(tGoarviaegse,)InPch.arPrmoatcoockoilnc4t1i8c-0R1e5c,o3veMryReSfteurdeynocfe PNoF.OST-6i2n9R5a.t1s4,,FiAndavlaRnecpeordtB,iAoarngaulsytRiecsaelarch
Services Study Report Author:
No. RG
FACT-TOX-111, York et al.
July
23,
1999.
OTHER
Dra iidsss por Append V --
Bb N
vss
000359
ROBUST SUMMARY- RS53
`Title: Determinationof Fluorochemicals
Serum
Hal-Livesof
Perfluorooctancsulfonate
and
Other
TEST SUBSTANCE
Identity: PFOS
Remarks:
METHOD
S1t9u98d)yfdreosmig2n:7 rCeotlirleedc,tfalnudoraoncahleymziecsalerpurmodeuvcetriyonsiexmmpolnotyhesesfoirnourpdteortyoeadrest(ebremgiinnentihnegsNeorvumemhbalefrlife ofPFOS and other fluorochemicals
Manufacturing/Processing/Use: N/A
Hypothesis tested: Determine serum half-life ofPFOS and other fluorochemicals. Study period: 1998-2003
Setting: N/A
mTaontuaflapcotpuurliantgiosint:es.27 refirces from 3M Decatur (n = 24) and Cottage Grove (n = 3)
Subject selection criteria: Not provided in report.
`Total #of subjects in study: N =24
Comparison population: N/A
Participation rate: 100 percent,to date
rSeutbijreeectwadses6c0riypetairosn:(ra2n5gema5l5e-a7n4d y2eafrse)m.aleMereatnireneus.mbAesrooff mbeognitnhnsinfgroofmstruedtiyr,emaevnetratgoethaegestoarft of the study was 30 months (range 5 - 130 months).
Health effects studied: None
Data collection methods: Blood scra samples
TDhetraeielscoolnledctaitoanscohlalveectoicocnu:rrBeedg,itnonidantge,inacNcoovredmibnegrt,o t1h9e981*bilnotoedriims croeplolretc.tedNoevienrfyosrimxatmioonnthwsa.s
Drproovindieldsasssto hoRewpotrtheAbplpoeondd was drawn, stored, analyzed, ete.
vas
000360
Exposure period: Unknown.
eDxepsocrsiuprteitoon/fdleuloirnoecahteimoincoaflsexposure groups/categories: Retirees with prior occupational
Measured or estimated exposure: N/A
Exposure levels: N/A
`Stmaotnitshtiicnatlermvealtsh)oadsss:umSienrguamohnaelf-cloimfpeacratlmcuelnattaeld mboadseeld.on three data points (approximately six
Other methodological information:
RESULTS
ODfesPcFrOibSewraessul3t4s4: dIanyistiaflorse2r0ummaPleFOanSdlfeevemlalrearnegteidreefsrowmho0s.1e-lo3.g1lipnpcma.r reMgerdeisasinonsemroudmelhahlafdliafen
> 0.6. Neither age nor calculation for PFOS.
the
number
ofmonths
retired
was
associated
with
the
serum
half-life
sSttuudyd.y sItnrteenrgitmhrsepaonrdtswweialklnbeessiesssu:edTehviesriys stihxemfiornstthisnt(earfitmerrecpaocrhtonfewthdisatsaecroulmlePctFiOonS).haRlef-sluilftes ssuhbojuelcdtsbeweirnetenroprterteepdocratuetd;iosusolmyedbueectaoustehethpeayucdiitdyonfotdayteta haavvaieltahbelierttohidradted.atSaepvoeinnotfantdheot2h7ers becauseofthe lack of fitofthe linear model.
Research sponsors: 3M Medical Department
Consistency of results: N/A
CONCLUSIONS Na
REFERENCE
Interim Report #1. Company: St. Paul,
Determinationof June 8, 2000.
Serum
Half-Lives
of Several
Fluorochemicals.
3M
OTHER
Dra nil AsesmensRepors Append V
vas
000361
ROBUST SUMMARY- RS54
"Title: 28-Day Percutaneous Absorption Study with FC-95 in Albino Rabbits (1981) TEST SUBSTANCE
Identity: Potassium perfluorooctanoic acid, CAS 2795-39-3
Remarks: FC-95
METHOD
Method/guideline followed: NA
Test type: in vivo
Species/strain/cell type or line: rabbit, New Zealand White
Sex: male and female
Age and body weight range of animals used: 1.82 2.37 kg
(Nduefmibnietriveo)f animals/sex/dose: 2 male and 2 female (range-finding); 10 male and 10 female
Route of administration: dermal (approximately 40%of body surface area) Vehicle: None specified
Doses: Single (definitive)
doses
of
1,000
and
5,000
mg/kg
(range-finding);
Single
dosesof
5,000
mg/kg
fEoxrcrseetriuomntraokuetnesf,robmodreytrfol-uoirdbsi,taalnsdintuissspureisormotonidtosoirnegdaanndd/oonrdsaaysmp1l,e7,d 1d4urainndg2s8tuafdtye:r bdlosoiondg. Statistical methods used: Not specified
tMheetihntoadctrsekmianrtkosc:ovTehreaptprurnokxoifmcataeclhy r4a0bb%itofwatshecslkiipnpesdurffraeceeofarheaa.iraInmdpetrhveiotuesstpalratsitcilce pshleaecteidnogn twhaast aunsiemdatlosomcaclyuddiestthurebtetshteaarptpilcilec.atiAon.flexAifbtleerp2l4asthiocurcsoollfarcwonatsacuts,etdhetotemsitnmiamtierziealthweapsossibility ardemmionvisetdraftrioomn,tahte osnkien.anAdntiwmoalhsouwresrpeosotb-sdeorsvee,dafftoerrprheamromvaaclootfoxtihce stiegsntsaritmimcleediaantdedlayilayfter stthuedrye)a.fieIrnutnhteildtefeirnmiitniavteisotnu(d1y,4 bdlaoyosdfworasthoebrtaanignee-dfifnrdoimngthseturdeytrao-nodrb2i8tadlasyisnufsorfotrhesedrefuimniatniavleysis trprhaietodrneif(a0ilnaisptepislvsiemcseattsuiRdoeynp,oratbnodAdpoypnewdidecaiygsht1s,7w,e1r4earnedco2r8depdositn-idtoisalilnyg.andSeornudmawysas7,fr1o4zaenndfo2r8.anaGlryosisss. In
Vie
000362
necropsy was performed on day 28.
RESULTS
Ddeeftianiilteivdersetsuudlyt.s:HyNpeoradcetaitvhistwyewraesobnsoetrevdeadmaotnagny5 doofs1e0imnabloetshotnhedraaynsg6e-afnindd7inpgosstt-uddoysianngd. thNeo vOinsliyblseelreusimonfsrowmertehenodtaeyd1atanndecdraopysy2.8 bOlnooedmdarlaewhsafdrwoemiognhet lmoaslsenaonteddoantetfheemeanldeorfabtbhietswteurdye. arensapleyczteidv.elyF.emMaalleeddaayy1 1aannddddaayy2288sseerruummtottoatlalflfulouroirnienelleevveellsswweerree0.190.a3nadnd1281.300.p2ppmp,m, respectively.
Metabolites measured: Total fluorine (assumed to represent perfluorooctane sulfonate) CONCLUSIONS
`The dermal LD, is greater than 5,000 mg/kg. Nthoe dfaecftintihtaitveabcsoonrcpltuisoinonasppceaanrsbetodorcacwunr.from the pharmacokinetic phase of this study other than
REFERENCE
O'Malley, K. D. Albino Rabbits,
and Ebbens, K. L. Safety Evaluation
L(a1b9o8r1a)to2r8y,DRaiykePrerLcaubtoraanteooruisesA,bsIoncr.p,tEixopneSrtiumdeyntwiNtoh.
FC-95
in
0979AB0632.
OTHER
`1T0hiesstwaablsisnhotthaeGlaLcPkosftsuidgyn;ihfoicwaenvterd,erimt awlastoaxuicdiittyedfrboymtshienQglAe Uappfluincctaitoino.n oTfhaelsatrugedydoissea.deTqhuaete study is not adequate in providing useful information on the dermal absorption of PFOS.
[--------
vam
000363
ROBUST SUMMARY - RS55
Title: Oral Teratology Studyof T-2999CoC in Rabbits TEST SUBSTANCE
Identity: Lot FM 3924.
Remarks: Identified as "wide-range" N- Ethyl FOSE alcohol in an internal 3M memo from DR Rickerto WC MCCormick dated December 10, 1980. Wide range was given to be:
88%C,F ;SO,N(CH,CH,)CH,CH,0H 10% C,,C, and C,-F,n,, SO,N(CH,CH,)CH,CH,0H, 1% N-Ethyl amide and 1% high boiler.
METHOD
Method/Guideline followed: Complied with general recommendation ofthe US FDA issued in January, 196.6 "Guidelines for Reproduction Studies for Safety Evaluationof Drugs for Human Usage." `GLP: Yes. Stated to be conducted in compliance with the FDA 1978 Good Laboratory Practice Regulations.
Year study performed: 1981
Species/Strain: Rabbit, New Zealand White/Miniken from Dutchland Laboratories.
Number of animals per dose: Rangefinder study, six. Principal study, eighteen
Route of administration: Oral (intubation)
Dosing regimen (list all with units): Does were dosed at a constant volume of 1 ml/kg, once daily, on gestation days (GD) 6-18 (day 0). The vehicle was com oil. Doses: Rangefinder: 0, 6,9, 12, 15, 25, 50, 75, or 100 mg/kg bodyweight.
Principal study: 0, 1.5, 5, 15 mg/kg bodyweight
Statistical methods used: Dunnett's t test for dam and pup weights, numberoffetuses, number ofresorption sites, numberof implantation sites and numberof corporea lutea. Chi square for percent abnormalities.
RESULTS
NOAEL:
Matemal 5 mg/kg.
Developmental 5.0 mg/kg.
TM
000364
LOAEL (dose and effect~) maternal and developmental:
Maternal. 15 mg/k-g reduced terminationofthe study.
mean
body
weight
gain
commencing
with
dosing
through
Developmental period.
15
mg/kg
abortions,
total
resorptions,
poor
survival
during
24
hour
incubation
`Toxic responseleffects by dose level - maternal: aRanndgesfiignndsoefr.abDorotsieosn.ofO1v0e0r, 5750,%5o0f,foerm2a5lemsg/dikegdraetsutlhteed2 hinigchoemstpoduosnedlaenvedlsd,odseeartehlsataeldsodeaths loictcteurrsrwedheatntthheelsotwuedry lweavesls.terAmlilndaatemdsaetiGthDer2a2b.orTtheedreorwwaesrealisno athmeeparoncebsosdyofwaebisgohrtblionsgstahteiarll cdoosnecse.ptIunsaes2"atrtahnegehfiignhdderossetu(d1y5 tmhge/rkegw)erweerneomcaoimntpaoiunnedd druelraitnegdpdreeagtnhasncayn.d a majorityofthe
tPhrirnocuigphaolusttutdhye.dToshieng15pemrgi/odkgundtoilsetehrmaidnaatrieodnoufcetdhmeesatnudyw.eiTghhet rgeadiuncctioomnpawraesdsttaoticsotnitcraollly
different during the Sor 1.5 mg/kg dose.
GD
6-9
period.
There
were
io
compound
related
maternal
effects
seen
at
the
m`Tgo/xkicgraessepvonisdee/necfefdecbtyssbtaytidsotisceallleyvsei-glnidfeivcealnotpimnecnrteaalse.s Einmbrreysootrpotxiiocnitayndwadescorbesaesredvevdiaabtle15
ffeettuusseess.eTxhpeernieunmcbeedrpofoiomrpsluarnvtivaatliodnursiintegs,thceor2p4ohraoulrutienacaubnadtifeotnalpewreiiogdh,t1w4a/2s8nvost a1f6f/e8c1tedi.n cTohnterol
(p<0.03)." related.
No gross, internal, or skeletal malformations were considered to be compound
`There were no compound related fetal effects seen at the 5 or 1.5 mg/kg dose.
Statistieal results: Statistically significant results discussed above.
Remarks -- Additional information to adequately assess the data: None.
CONCLUSIONS
Comment on conclusions.
author's
conclusions
and
whether
you
agree:
Agree
with
the
study
author's
REFERENCES
Report: St. Paul
Oral MN.
Teratology Studyof T-2999CoC in Experiment Number 0681TB0212.
Rabbits,
January
7,
1982.
Riker
Laboratories,
LRaebpoorratt:orOireasl,RSat.ngPeafuilndMeNr.StEuxdpyeorifmTe-n2t9n9u9mCboeCri0n6P8r0eRgBna0n0t19Rabbits, June 25, 1981. Riker
of niaAsssmen Report Appests
van
000365
ROBUST SUMMARY - RS56
Title: Absorption and biotransformation of N-EFOSE and tissue distribution and elimination of carbon-14 after administration of N-EtFOSE-""C in feed (1983)
TEST SUBSTANCE
Identity: 2-N-ethyl perfluorooctanesulfonamido ethanol labelled with carbon-14 at the carbon alpha to the sulfur atom (Riker Isotope Inventory Number 468, 0.483 0.020 uCi/mg)
Remarks: FC-95-14C (carbon-14 label alpha to sulfur atom, Riker Isotope Inventory Number 442). The specific activity is 0.459 +- 0.008 uCiimg. Thin-layer and column chromatography showed the FC-95-14C to be at least 99% radiochemically pure. The FC-95-14C was found to be suitable for metabolism studies. (Synthesis described in Johnson and Beh, 1979).
METHOD
Method/guideline followed: NA
Test type: in vivo
Species/strainicell type or line: rat, Charles River CD
Sex: male
Age and body weight range of animals used: weeks, bw mean 277 g (range 220-329)
Number of animals/sex/dose: 3 per each time-point experimental group (only one dose used) for time points 1,2,4,8,16 and 32 days post-dose.
Route of administration: dietary, mixed in feed, given to fasted rats for two hours (time-point `groups for 1,2, and 4days) or 12 hours (time-point groups for 8,16 and 32 days)
Vehicle: feed only
Doses: 0.531 mg/g feed (531 ppm in diet) given as a single "dose" to fasted rats with a mean dose of 10.13 mg/kg as calculated from the weightoffeed consumed
Excretion routes, body fluids, and tissues monitored and/or sampled during study: Urine and feces (continuous 24-hour collectionsfor time-points 1,2,4and 8 days and pooled collections for each animal in time-point groups for 16 and 32 days). Tissues and fluids taken at terminal sacrificeofeach group were blood/plasma, liver, kidney, lung, spleen, bone marrow, subcutaneous and abdominal fat, and muscle (all animals), as well as digestive tract (esophagus, stomach and intestines) and remaining carcass (time-point groups for 1 and 2 days post-dose).
ref nitsre Report ppenic
vars
ov366
Statistical methods used: mean, standard deviation Method remarks: Rats were fasted with free access to water for 24 hours prior to dosing. Groupsofthree rats for each time point were assembled such that their individual body weights did not differ by more than 21 grams. The diet/test compound mixture was provided for two hours to animals in the groups for 1,2 and 4 days. All feed was consumed in this period. For animals in tme-point `groups 8,16 and 32 days, feeding was allowed for 12 hours; however, mostofthe feed was immediately consumed. Dose was verified by analysis ofthe feed/test compound mixture and by weighing the amountoffeed consumed. The authors note that very little feed was spilled. RESULTS Detailed results: `The authors conclude that at least 70 %of the dose administered in feed was absorbed. Elimination in urine was concluded to be poor, with less than 3.0 %ofthe dose being eliminated in urine by 32 days post-dose. Fecal elimination was 20-30 times more extensive than urinary elimination, with approximately 60 %ofthe dose being eliminated in 32 days. Total recovery of radioactivity over 48 hours was 86 %. A meanof9.5 %of the dose was in the liver after 32 days. After 32 days, the mean liver/plasma, spleen/plasma and bone marrow/plasma ratios were 11.8, 0.4 and 0.4, respectively. Liver to plasma ratios increased rapidly to plateau after 16 days. `The serum elimination half-life was found to be 7.5 days over the first 16 days; however, there was practically no change in the serum concentration from day 16 to day 32 (2.2 pg equivalents versus 2.1 pug equivalents at day 32). Perfluoroctanesulfonate (PFOS) was identified as a `metabolite in the liver extractsofrats sacrificed at 48 hours post-dose. PFOS represented at least 22 %ofthe radioactivity found in the liver at 48 hours. Perfluorooctanesulfonamide was tentatively identified as another metabolite in the 48-hour liver extracts. This metabolite, assumed to be perfluorooctanesulfonamide, represented at least 32 %of theradioactivity found in the liver at 48 hours post-dose. Other metabolites were present but not identified. `The distributionofcabon-14 in tissues over time is represented by the following table. Data are expressed as a percentof dose in tissue.
Drath nial sscsmers Report Append V
van
000367
Table. Carbon-14 content oftissues after an oral dose of N-EtFOSE-"C in feed to male rats
(mean dose, 10.13 mg/kg)
Bay
Post Liver
Kidney| Lungs |RBC
GI Carcas
12[f7o%o [[aanns JJoosst [[oodasr[[570090 [[22582 [[Treaeil[[10587 || OIEC 2 XE0 OE T 3 C ECO 5OE EBEELL [6 {106sToe [o0 a JCorC oCsXs [CooEr [E WW E|
((ba))
Estimate
Sample not
taken
Metabolites measured: Perfluorooctanesulfonate identified and quantitated. Perfluorooctanesulfonamide tentatively identified.
CONCLUSIONS The study is well-conducted and thorough. Agree with the conclusionsofthe authors.
REFERENCE Extent and Routeof Excretion and Tissue Distribution of Total Carbon-14 in Rats after a Single Intravenous Dose of FC-95-14 C. Riker Laboratories, Inc., Subsidiary of 3M, St. Paul, MN.
Johnson, JD, Gibson, SJ, and Ober, RE , December 28, 1979.
Ong
HoT
vay
000368
ROBUST SUMMARY - RS57
Title: Extent and RouteofExcretion and Tissue Distributionof Total Carbon-14 in Rats after a Single Intravenous DoseofFC-95-14C (1979)
TEST SUBSTANCE
Identity: FC-95-14C, Carbon-14 labeled potassium perfluorooctylsulfonate, CAS 2795-39-3
Remarks: FC-95-14C (carbon-14 label alpha to sulfur atom, Riker Isotope Inventory Number 442). The specific activity is 0.459 +- 0.008 uCi/mg. Thin-layer and column chromatography showed the FC-95-14C to be at least 99% radiochemically pure. The FC-95-14C was found to be suitable for metabolism studies. (Synthesis described in Johnson and Behr, 1979).
METHOD
Method/guideline followed: NA
Test type: in vivo
Species/strain/eell type or line: rat, Charles River CD
Sex: male
Age and body weight range of animals used: weeks, bw mean 288 g (range 262-303)
Numberof animals/sex/dose: 6
Route of administration: iv, via tail vein
Vehicle: 0.9% NaCL solution containing 1.2 mg FC-95-14C/2.0 ml
Doses: 4.2 mg/kg average, single dose
Excretion routes, body fluids, and tissues monitored and/or sampled during study: urine, feces, liver, plasma, kidney, lung, spleen, bone marrow, adrenals, skin, testes, muscle, fat, eye, brein
Statistical methods used: mean, standard deviation
Method remarks:
Rats were conditioned to individual metal metabolism cages for 24 hours prior to dosing. The
rats were allowed free access to Purina Ground Chow and water before and after dosing. Each
rat was weighed, anesthetized with diethyl ether, then given a single iv dose using a 3.0 cc
disposable plastic syringe fitted with a 26 gauge 1/2" needle. Urine and feces were collected at
Dra ntlsess Report Append
va
000369
intervals for each of the six rats for 89 days. At 89 days post dose, the rats were anesthetized with diethyl ether; blood was drawn from the descending aorta, animals were sacrificed by exsangination, and tissue samples were collected.
RESULTS
Detailed results: By 89 days post dose, mean urinary excretion was 30.2+-1.5%oftotal C-14 administered. Mean cumulative fecal excretion was 12.6+-1.2%. Radioactive content in feces was 00 low to `measureafter64 days. Mean tissue C-14 concentrations above one ug FC-95-14C equivalents/g were as follows: liver, 20.6; plasma, 2.2; kidney, 1.1; and lung, 1.1. Other tissues such as `muscle, skin, bone marrow, and spleen had concentrations ranging from 0.2 0 0.6 ug/g. There was a difference in C-14 contentof subcutaneous fat (0.2 ug/g) and abdominal fat (<= 0.08 ug/g). Very little C-14 was found in whole eye (0.16 ug/g) and no detectable C-14 was found in brain. Only liver and plasma contained a substantial percentageofdose at 89 days post dose, 25.21% and 2.81%, respectively. The low levelsofradioactivity found for kidney, lung, testes, and spleen are due in part to blood still contained in these organs when homogenized.
Mean Excretion of Total Carbon-14 in Urine Over Time
Collection Period
Percent Dose
(Days)
During Period
00.5
091
05-1
077
12
121
23
1.03
34
093
45
083
56
07
67
076
78
075
89
0.68
9-10
0.68
10-11
0.59
11-12
0.58
1213
059
13-14
055
14-15
054
15-16
051
16-17
048
17-18
043
18-19
:
039
19:21
084
2123
0.78
23.25
0.66
2527
0.68
2729
068
2932
086
Dra itl Assn:Report Appedic
"500370
32:36
1.05
36-40
099
40-43
075
4347
092
47-50
0.68
50-54
078
5457
0.61
57-61
079
61-69
1.50
69-78
1.64
78:89
2.08
Total
302
Mean Excretionof Total Carbon-14 in Feces Over Time
Collection Period
Percent Dose
(Days)
During Period,
00.5
0.049
05-1
0.842
12
0.795
23
0.649
34
0.656
45
0577
56
0510
67
0.588
78
0.482
89
0.421
9-10
0.387
10-11
0370
11-12
029
12:13
0310
13-14
0281
1415
0276
15-16
0272
16-17
0.187
17-18
0.163
18-19
0.129
1921
0311
21-23
0302
23.25
0262
2527
0208
27.29
0202
29-32
0223
32:36
0526
36-50
1530
50-64
0833
Total
126
--
"7 000374
Metabolites measured: none. CONCLUSIONS agree REFERENCE Extent and Route of Excretion and Tissue DistributionofTotal Carbon-14 in Rats after a Single Intravenous Dose of FC-95- 14 C. Riker Laboratories, Inc., Subsidiaryof3M, St. Paul, MN. Johnson, JD, Gibson, SI, and Ober, RE , December28, 1979. OTHER
DropnilAsessmReepnorst - Append
vam 006373
ROBUST SUMMARY - RS58
Title: Cholestyramine-Enhanced Fecal Eliminationof Carbon-14 in Rats after Administration `of Ammonium [14C]Perfluorooctanoaotre Potassium [14C]Perfluorooctanesulfonate (1984) TEST SUBSTANCE Identity: Potassium [14C]Perfluorooctanesulfonate (14C-PFOS) Ammonium [14C]Perfluorooctanoate (14C-PFO) Remarks: 14C-PFOS: sp act 0.46 uClmg, radiochemical purity >99%, 14C label in PFOS is adjacent to sulfur 14C-PFO: sp act 0.51 uClmg, radiochemical purity >98% METHOD Method/guideline followed: NA Test type: in vivo Species/straincell type or line: rat, Charles River CD Sex: male Age and body weight range of animals used: 12 weeks, 300-342 g Number of animals/sex/dose: 5 Route of administration: iv Vehicle: 0.9% NaCl, 2 ml/rat Doses: Potassium [14C]Perfluorooctanesulfonate (POS): 3.4 mg/kg mean, single dose, 0.56 mg/ml PFOS control animals: 3.5 mg/kg mean Ammonium [14C)Perfluorooctanoate (PFO): 13.3 mg/kg mean, single dose, 2.1 mg/ml PFO control animals: 13.5 mg/kg mean Excretion routes, body fluids, and tissues monitored and/or sampled during study: Urine, plasma, red blood cells, liver Statistical methods used: mean, standard deviation, Student's test Method remarks: rReatfsnwiearAeshaounseRdepionrtinAdpipevniddual stainless-steel metabolism cages and fasted with free aVcciesss to
000373
`water for 24 hrs prior to receiving the fluorochemicals. The radiolabeled compounds were administered as single intravenous doses (lateral tail vein). Two mlofdosing solution was administered to cach rat. Ten rats were dosed with each compound. Five rats from each group `were fed cholestyramine (dried and ground resin Z-620), 4% in feed (Purina Lab Chow), for 14 days after administration ofPFO andfor21 days after administrationof PFOS. Control rats `were administered radiolabeled fluorochemical but were not treated with cholestyramine. In order to allow comparisonofthe radiometric results on an absolute basis, the radiolabel doses were not adjusted for individual body weights. Urine and feces samples were collected at intervals for individual rats in each group until 14 days after 14C-PFO administration and 21 days after 14C-PFOS administration. At these times, rats were anesthetized with diethyl ether and exsanguinated by drawing blood from the descending aorta. Plasma and red blood cells were prepared promptly by centrifugation. Liver was collected as the whole organ and stored frozen until analysis.
RESULTS
Detailed results: After 21 daysofcholestyramine treatment, the mean percentage of 14C-PFOS dose eliminated via feces (75.8 +- 5.0) was 9.5-fold the mean percentageofdose eliminated via feces by control rats (8.0+ 0.8). After adjustment for the amountofcarbon-14 excreted in urine (18% for controls and 5% for cholestyramine-treated), the amountsofcarbon-14 remaining to be excreted are 19% for cholestyramine-treated rats and 74% for control rats. Afier 14C-PFOS administration, the mean liver carbon-14 content at 21 days represents 11% and 40% of the dose forcholestyramine treated and control rats, respectively. Mean plasma and red blood cell carbon-14 concentrations are significantly lowerafter21 daysofcholestyramine treatment.
After 14 daysofcholestyramine treatment, the mean percentage of 14C-PFO dose eliminated via feces (43.2 + 5.5) was 9.8-fold the mean percentageofdose eliminated via feces by control rats (44+ 1.0). After adjustment for the amountofcarbon-14 excreted in urine (67% for controls and 419% for cholestyraminetreated), the amountsof carbon-14 remaining to be excreted are 16% for cholestyramine-treated rats and 28% for control rats. After 14C-PFO administration, the mean liver carbon-14 content at 14 days represents 4% and 8%ofthe dose for cholestyraminetreated and control rats, respectively. Mean plasma and red blood cell carbon-14 concentrations are significantly lower after 14 daysof cholestyramine treatment.
Carbon-14 Concentration (expressed as ug eq/g tissue or ml fluid)
Treatment Group Liver Plasma Red Blood Cells
14C-PFOS
Cholestyramine ~~ 9.4+-16* 09+0.1* 0340.1
Control
356456 69+06
18+0.4
14C-PFO
Cholestyramine~~ 12.1+2.1%
Control
23+62
5.1+-1.7* 147+638
18-07 42424
*Significantly different from control values (p<0.05)
rpntl Ascsmens Roepoort Appendic
vas 00374 .
`The authors conclude that the high concentration of 14C-PFOS or 14C-PFO in liver at 2 to 3 weeks after dosing and the fact that cholestyramine treatment enhances fecal elimination of carbon-14 by nearly 10-fold suggest that there is a considerable enterohepatic circulation of 14CPFOS and 14C-PFO. Metabolites measured: none CONCLUSIONS agree REFERENCE Johnson, J. D., Gibson, SJ, and Ober, RE (1984). Cholestyramine-Enhanced Fecal Elimination of Carbon-14 in Rats after AdministrationofAmmonium [14C)Perfluorooctanoate or Potassium [14C]Perfluorooctanesulfonate. Fundamental and Applied Toxicology 4, pages 972-976. OTHER Seealso Johnson, J. D., Gibson, SJ, and Ober RE (1984). Enhanced eliminationof FC-95-14C and FC-143-14C in rats with cholestyramine treatment. Project No. 8900310200, Riker Laboratories, Inc. St. Paul, MN.
Dr ntissn Rpor- ppeic
vas
000375
ROBUST SUMMARY - RS59
`Title: Analytical Laboratory Report on the Determinationofthe Presence and Concentration of Potassium Perfluorooctanesulfonate (CAS Number: 2795-39-3) in the Serum and Liver of
Sprague-Dawley Rats Exposed to PFOS via Gavage (1999)
TEST SUBSTANCE
Identity: Potassium Perfluorooctanesulfonate (PFOS), CAS Number: 2795-39-3
Remarks: PFOS purity 99.28%, 3M Chemical Lot Number 193
METHOD
Method/guideline followed: US FDA GLP Final Rule 21 CFR 58
Test type: in vivo
Species/strain/cell type or line: rat, Sprague-Dawley
Sex: both
Age and body weight rangeof animals used: 60 days, males 300-325 g, females 200-225 g
Number of animals/sex/dose: FO 35, F125
Route of administration: oral
Vehicle: 0.5% Tween 80, 5 ml/kg
Doses: 0.1, 0.4, 1.6, or 3.2 mg PFOS per kg/day in 0.5% Tween 80. These doses correspond to concentrationsof 0.2, 0.8, 0.32, and 0.64 mg/ml. Groups of vehicle control FO rats were
administered only Tween 80. Male FO animals were treated 42 days prior to mating and through
`mating period; female FO animals were administered PFOS daily 42 days prior to mating,
through gestation, and up to 20 days following litter delivery. FI male and female rats were `exposed to the chemical in utero and during lactation. Following weaning at 21 days ofage,
selected F1 animals were treated during development and productionof F2 animals.
Elixvcerreatnidonserrouutmes, body fluids, and tissues monitored and/or sampled during study:
Statistical methods used:
Means and standard deviations were calculated using Microsoft Excel, and relative standard
deviations were calculated manually.
ort Annger pnd
vadmooa7e
Method remarks: Liver and sera samples collected from the initial populationof dosed animals (F0) and their offspring (F1) were analyzed for the presence ofPFOS. Liver samples were homogenized, and liver and sera samples were extracted by an ion-pairing extraction procedure. The extracts were quantitatively analyzed using high-pressure liquid chromatography/electrospray tandem mass spectrometry, and PFOS levels were evaluated against extracted standards. Some minor deviations from US FDA GLP Final Rule 21 CFR 58 are listed in the report
RESULTS
Detailed results:
FO results by dose group:
Dose group Average PFOS conc.
(mgkg/day) in serum (ug/ml)
00:
female 0.0307
male 0.0244
0.1:
female 5.28
male 10.5
0.4:
female 18.9
male 45.4
16:
female 82
male 152
32
female NR*
male 273
*samples not received
Average PFOS conc. in liver (uglg) female 0.171 male 0.665 female 14.8 male84.9 female 58.0 male 176 female 184 male 323 female NR* male 1360
Average PFOS concentrations in pooled liver samples from F1 animals shortly after birth were 0.0511, 6.19, 57.6, and 70.4 ug/g in the 0.0, 0.1, 0.4, and 1.6 mg/kg/day dose groups, respectively. No samples collected from F1 males or females that received 3.2 mg/kg/day were submitted for analysis.
Metabolites measured: Analyses were performed to determine the presence of EIFOSE, PFOSA, POAA<PFOSEA, PFOSAA, and the monoester; however, these data were collected for informational purposes only, and were not reported.
CONCLUSIONS: agree
REFERENCE Analytical Laboratory Report on the Determinationof the Presence and Concentration of Potassium Perfluorooctanesulfonate (CAS Number: 2795-39-3) in the Serum and Liver of Sprague-Dawley Rats Exposed to PFOS via Gavage. Argus Research Laboratories, Inc., Horsham, PA. Laboratory Report No. U2006, Requestor Project No. 3M TOX 6295.9, 3M Environmental Laboratory Report No. FACT Tox-012. York, RG, Hansen, K, and Clemen, L., October 27, 1999.
OTHER Dra ntlsesResport Append V
vi900377
raf nil Assesment Repor Append
V14000378
ROBUST SUMMARY - RS60
Title: Absorption of FC-95-14C in Rats after a Single OralDose (1979)
TEST SUBSTANCE
Identity: FC-95-14C, Carbon-14 labeled potassium perfluorooctylsulfonate, CAS 2795-39-3
Remarks: sFpCe-ci9f5i-c1a4cCtiv(ictayrbison0-.14459la+b-el0a.l0p0h8atuoCi/smuglf.urTahtionm-,laRyiekrearnIdsoctoolpuemInnvcehnrtoomraytNougrmabpehry 4s4h2)o.weTdhtehe FC-95-14C 10 be at least 99% radiochemically pure. The FC-95-14C was found to be suitable for metabolism studies. (Synthesis described in Johnson and Behr, 1979).
METHOD
Method/guideline followed: NA
Test type: in vivo
Species/strainicell type or line: rat, Charles River CD
Sex: male
Age and body weight range of animals used: weeks, bw mean 285 g (range 243-315)
Number of animals/sex/dose: 24
Route of administration: oral
Vehicle: 0.9% NaCL solution containing 1.2 mg FC-95-14C/2.0 ml
Doses: 4.2 mg/kg average, single dose:
rEexdcrbeltoioodncerlolust,epsl,absmoad,yufrliunied,s,feacnesd, tsipslseueens, mdiogneisttoivreedtraacntdp/loursscaonmtpelnetds (deusroipnhgagsutsu,dys:tomach, small intestine, large intestine, and colon), and carcass
Statistical methods used: mean, log mean concentration versus time least squares line
Method remarks:
Rats were conditioned to individual metal metabolism cages for 24 hours prior to dosing. Rats
wfaesrteedarlaltowwaeds fwreeiegahcecdesismtmoedPiuartinealyGrbeofuonrde Cbehionwg gainvdenwaatesirnbgelfeoorrealanddosaefotefr FdCos-i9n5g-.14ECa.chTnhoen-
dhoalsfinhgousrolauttmioondewraasteprseppeaerdedinbaymaedcdhianngi~ca2l00shmakgeorf, aFnCd-9ce5n-t1ri4fCugtion0g..9T%heNasCulpe,rsnahtaaknitngwafosr one
rat iil Assn Ror ppendicV
vase
000379
rdeetmeorvmeidneadndbyusdierdecftorcoduonstiinngg.solTuhteiond.osTehewacsardbeolni-ve1r4ecdownittehntaof2t.0hce dgolsaisnsgssyorliuntgieon(Twraylson) fitted with a stainless steel intubation tube.
`poGsrtoudpossoef.thRraetes rwaetrseweanreestsahcertiifziecdedwibtyhedxiseatnhygluientahteiroannadtb1l,o2o,d6,wa1s2,d2r4a,w4n8,fr9o6,m atnhed d1e4s4cehnoduirnsg
aortaofeach rat and by centrifugation. In
imediately transferred to a heparinized tube. addition toplasmaand red blood cells, otal
Plasma was prepared promptly urine, total feces, spleen,
driegmeasitnidveertroafcctarplcuassscownetrenetssa(veesdopfhraogmuse,acshtoofmatchhe,tshmraelelraitnsteisntitnhee,2l4aragendin4te8sthionuer,sapnodsctodloons)e, and
`groups for carbon-14 analysis.
RESULTS
Detailed results: Arafttse,raat lseiansgtl9e 5or%aolfdtohseeotfotaFlC-ca9r5b-o1n4-C14(msesaynstdeomsiec,a4l.l2y magb/sokrgb)eidnasto2lu4thioounrtso.gTrohuephsoalfft-hlirfeeefomrale eliminationoftotal carbon-14 from plasma is 7.5 days.
`eTxhceredtiigoenstiisv1e.t5ra5c%toafndthceondtoesnetsatc2on4thaoiunresd aonndt3he.2a4ve%raagte4,83h.o4ur5s%.oftAthe24dohsoeu.rs,Ththeemmeeaannfsecuaml of
tloitkaellycarrepbroens-e1n4tsinsyfsetceemsiacnaldldyiagbesstoirvbeedtraccatrpblouns-1c4onptreenstesntisc5it%hoerftinhethedodsieg.estSiovmeetorfactthtiisss5ue%s or
in of
the digestive tract rats are consistent
contents with the
as 24
a resultofexcretion. hour post dose data.
The data from the 48 hour post dose Thus, at least 95%ofthe FC-95-14C
group dose
wraadsioaabctsiovribteydrfercoovmesroeldutwiaosn fafotuenrdadinmitnhiestcarractaisosn. toTnhoen-cfaarsctaesds draattsa. aTrehenomtaajsorreploiratblieonoasftthheeother
twiasssudeifdfaitcaulstintcoeaslsaurrgee.voThleurmee ihsosmoomgeeneaxtcerestwioenreofnetocteaslscaaryrbaonnd-1h4ominoguerinnceit(y1o-2f%/sdaamyp)l.e Talhiequots
asnpldeetnhse pferrocmentthoef24thheoduorsaenidn4t8hehwohuorlpeosotrgdaonsewraasts~w0e.r2e%.anTahlyezceodncfeornttroatatliocnasrobfotno-t1a4lccoanrtbenotn,14.
icnonrceedntbrlaotoidoncealtls24anadndpl4a8smhaouwresries c0o.m2p5aarnedd.0.3T9h,eremsepaecntirvaetliyo.ofrTheuds,blaot o2d4 caelnld t4o8plhoausrmsa aflera
single oral dose of FC-95-14C, there is no selective retentionof carbon-14 in red blood cells;
`gTrhoeuphasloff-tlihfreoefe eraltismiatna1t,i2o,n6f,r1o2m, p2l4,as4m8a, w96a,sadnedte1r4m4inheodurbsyaaftnearlyasissiongflpeloarsalmadossaeompfleFsC-f9r5o-m l1i4nCe.thTrhoeuglhogtohefimnediavnidcuoanlcpeonitnrtastifornovme2rs4ustoti1m4e4 hfoorurtshefsoerdtahteasewadastpaloftittsedt.heTehqeuatleiaosnt:sCqpua=res i1s5.16759h(o-u0r.s00(37.8571d)aywsh)e.reThCups, ies lpilmaisnamtaicoonncfernotmraptlioans.maTohfetohtaallf-claifreboonfe-l1i4maifntaertiaonsinfgrloemoprallasdmoase Of FC-95-14C is slow.
Metabolites measured: none CONCLUSIONS agree Dra itl Assesment Repors Append V
: var
000380
REFERENCE `Absorption of
FC-95-14C
in
Rats
after
a
Single
Oral
Dose.
Riker Laboratories, Inc.,
Subsidiary
of 3M, St. Paul, MN. Project No. 890310200. Johnson, JD, Gibson, SJ, and Ober, RF, October
26,1979.
OThTisHEorRal dosing experiment (FC-Experiment 4) was paired with an iv dosing experiment (FCExperiment 3) which was designed to provide data on the route and extentoftotal C-14 excretion.
Dv miiAssent Report Append
"$o0as1