Document xDrp9JyRZEZmbnp5oo30RyGQ
\
AR226-2385
PERSONAL AMD COflFroEblTIAL
CC! T. A. Foster June 14,1984
TOs J. A. Schiaid.
^^4Wf^-- FROM; J'J?- Doughty . UPDATE on G-8 IN frIATER SAMPLES
The
attached,
table
shows
the the
C-8 new
in water data including the moat data confirm the original data^
recent data,. I conclude
1.
The
Du Font
data
shows
that the test does not
nob contaminate the
see C-8 sample.
up
river
and the sampling system does
2. The second Washington sample had. essentially the same C-8
content as the first.
3.
The
new Lubeck
sample
shows essentially the Thus the Washington
sa-ae concentration sample is from the
as the Lubeck
Washington saTOple. Mater System as I suspect
or
at
least
the
Luheck
system
has
the same concentration,
4. The original detection limit
Little Hocking
for the test."
sample was very close The concentration now
to the
appears
to
he
below the detection limit.
I
do
not
plan to do additional The concentrations
sampling
are very
unless further information low and in my Judgement
is needed. are not cause
for
concern.
EXD079098
f
LOCATION
\
C-8 IN MATER <3/15/84) and (6/4/84-)
DISTANCE (MILES)
SIDE
ppti C-B*^*
PARKERSB'ORG
m POMT
(3/15/84) (6/4/84)
DISTRIBUTION CEHTER OF PKRKERSBURG
ViASHIKGTOH
(3/15/84) (6/4/84-)
LUBECK
(6/4/84.) LITTLE HOCKING
(3/15/84) (6/4/84)
BELLEVILLE
PEED5VILLE
RAVEMSTOOD
RACINE
POIWT PLEASMW
AA GALLIPOLIS
7.3 up stream
W
0.5 up sfcreaia
W
0..25 Ao^^n streatti* MWV
0.25 down stream WtW
0.2.5 down stream Ww
3 down stream
OHHTIO
12 down sbreaia 14 down stream 29 dcwi streaia 50 down stream 74 clown stream 79 down stream
IW OHIO .
wv OHIO
W OHXO
MD
IID ND
.
NO
'
AV?
1.2/f'J
l.O'
1,5 .
0^
-erB"HD
N^ ^
^/!
MD
m
HD
HD
HD
KD
AM@H is back ft-oia bhs river . AAfirsfc community to take water directly from the river AAAcvoanluveesrtobtotaiCn-e8d vfsroFm cEoxnpteenritmoernitgailnSatlalytiornepmoruteltdiplied by 1.5 to ND = below the detection limit o 0.6 as C-B (0.4 as T)
EID07S098.01