Document x1x74no16RwQ0Rq4gBr6VoeEy

Ro b e r t L. Mu e l l e r Ro b e r t E. Da v u n Ric h a r d W. Gu n n in g De n n is S. O'Br ie n L, Ro b e r t Mu e l l e r Ke v in J. Da v l in LIVINGSTONE, MUELLER, GUNNING, O'BRIEN & DAVLIN, P.C. Attorneys at Law 620 Ea s t Ed w a r d s St r e e t Po s t Of f ic e Bo x 335 Sp r in g f ie l d , Il l in o is 62705 Te l e p h o n e (217) 525-1070 February 20, 1984 FORMERLY Liv in g s t o n e , Mu e l l e r , Dr a k e a n d Da v u n C. A. Liv in g s t o n e 1896-1982 Le s l ie V. Dr a k e 1895-1971 Mr. Steven Borgstrcm Raymond Sheakley & Associates, Inc 18W100 22nd Street - Suite 124 Oakbrook Terrace, Illinois 60181 Dear Steve: REDACTED In re: : v. Sherwin-Williams 8209 00116 May 15, 1981 This case was on the Litchfield docket February 2, 1984- There was no in dication frcrn Ron Scharf, by request for hearing or otherwise, that he wanted to proceed. The day to which Arbitrator Boyd put ovet the February cases was June 7, 1984. Your note to the bottom of the second request, Steve, asks if we need anything else. I think not, - except for the fact that you and I discussed the possibility of getting a toxicologist's opinion on zinc oxide. I've never done that, and now that I'm reminded will see if I can turn up someone here locally that would fit that bill. Other than that, I see no point in pushing Scharf. Sorry I overlooked answering your original inquiry of December 23. With best personal regards, I am Very truly yours. Robert L. Mueller RLM:ln N40291 0007-SWP-005 801062 CONFIDENTIAL