Document x1BGG614955vQKNeBDoZQ0Ex0

M*C-ICOf Monsanto *o>4iocationi r. d. Coleman - Texas City, TX *" April 3, 1985 MN SHAC Minutes 3/27/85 TO D. A. Barfoot J. V. Cavender J. M. Gatewood R. T. Hammann B. J. Sanders R. V. Sharp CCG. L. Tromblee File A J The regular weekly meeting of the SHAC committee was called to order by J. Gatewood on 3/27/85 in the V.I.P. conference room. H.S.C. J. Gatewood reviewed with the committee concerns raised during the last HSC meeting. The problem of contractors not contacting Ray Shupak before working in the plant will be addressed by R. Hammann. Texas Southwest Safety Conference and Exposition Members of SHAC will attend the TSSCE on Tuesday afternoon, April 2. Of particular interest is the "off the job safety" exposition. First Quarter Safety and Housekeeping D. Barfoot reported that no feedback had been received from any of the crafts. J. Gatewood to follow up. Only two re sponses were received from office services. R. Coleman to follow up. Second Quarter Safety and Housekeeping Inspection D. Barfoot assigned SHAC members to inspection teams and distributed copies of key emphasis areas. Inspections will be conducted during the weeks of April 10 and April 16. Dual winners per group will be allowed. AVIP Extensions Due to the increasing number of requests for AVIP inspections, a form has been prepared by W. G. Blum to help facilitate evaluation of the requests. J. Gatewood asked SHAC members to be prepared to comment on the form at the next meeting. SC 000403 LA1V1001600 SHAC Minutes 3/27/85 page 2 1984 Safety Awards R. Sharp reported that all cards had been returned. The decision was made to require each person to pick up his own gift. This will help minimize confusion and offset potential inventory shrinkage. A location for storing the gifts must be found. The main gate guard house will be reviewed. HHMA Action Plan J. Gatewood asked SHAC members to review the HHMA Action Plan and be prepared to discuss it at the next meeting. R. D. Coleman /ec 000404 LAM001601 c 1985 2nd Quarter Housekeeping Inspection Emphasis Areas: 0 AVIP Status Interlock Bypass Procedure HHMA Communications o Condition of Contractor Equipment and Tools 0 Vent Hood Inspection & Velocity Settings o Knowledge of Instruction Points Operability of Fire Monitor 0 Operability of Plectron Review findings with group before leaving. This will take longer, but will improve communications and speed up action items. Allow for some time in each area to sit down with supervisors and hourly personnel for an informal evaluation. During the Inspection: Ask questions about AVIP status (need documentation of approval if inspection was delayed). Look for formalized Interlock Bypass Procedure. c Ask individuals their understanding of the High Hazard Materials Audits. Dates: Weeks of April 9 and 15 (inspection report out by April 26). Schedule at inspector's convenience. New SHAC members to set inspection up. Inspection Teams: Names attached. Inspection Report Feedback: By May 24. DAB/msd 3/20/85 SC 000405 LAM001602 Your Mane Supervisory Safety Meeting Quiz February IS, 1985 Job Safety Audit (JSA) - ?RS #35 Please answer the following questions. Sign and leave the completed quiz on the table by the doors as you leave. 1. What is the three-fold scope of the Job Safety Audit? 2. How many people participate in a JSA? What departments are they from? 3. What time limit does ?RS #35 place on the type of job to be audited' 4. How are jobs selected for a JSA? 5. According to PRS #35, when is a JSA posted on the JSA Bulletin Board? 6. When is a JSA considered completed? 7. How are JSA recommendations executed? 8. According to PRS #35, what is the frequency specified for JSA reviews by: a) The area General Superintendent? b) The Plant Manager? SC 000406 LAM001603 Number 35 **' Sfafety? Frxediinssr/f Rules /- oir Staifidai ds 1 Subieci JOB SAFETY AUDIT Supersedes NEW Dote 2/5/80 Page 1 Of 4 PURPOSE: This procedure is provided to define the scope, responsibility, methods, and accountability for the Port Plastics Plant Job Safety Audit program. SCOPE: Job Safety Audit (JSA) at Port Plastics is a method of addressing on-the-job safety concerns, communicating safety and developing safety awareness at all levels in the plant. JSA involves members of supervision and operations personnel examining job steps as they are executed, assessing related safety/ potential hazards of the job steps and providing solutions such as better procedures, techniques or facilities to eliminate safety concerns. The Job Safety Audit is limited in scope to examine clearly defined narrow job steps --not broad job descriptions. The JSA usually examines job steps which can be completed in less than 20 minutes. JSA is used for Operator involved job steps. Equipment is audited only as it relates to Operator involvement. Process and facility Safety Audits are beyond the scope of JSA and are covered by separate procedures. V RESPONSIBILITY: Safety as the Port Plastics plant is recognized as an individual responsibility. The Job Safety Audit provides a vehicle for communicating and training safety at all levels in the plant and for achieving an increased level of safety awareness. Member of the operating groups, as well as supervision, participate in Job Safety Audits. The responsibility of recording and communicating JSA recommen dations and implementing required corrective action rests with the department supervisor. PROCEDURE: I. Conducting Job Safety Audits A. Audit Committee The audit committee is a three member team -- one representative from department supervision, one department operator familiar with the job (usually one he normally does), and a member from outside the department in no way connected with the operation (enhances objectivity). B. Job Selection C The job to be audited is selected fron a list of jobs already identified by department personnel for JSA, or from a specific job step highlighted in safety meetings, or through the area safety representative, or through SC 000407 LAIVI001604 Safely Procedures / Rules / or Standards Monsanto #35 2 f 4 V JOB SAFETY AUOIT (cont'd) PROCEDURE I.Conducting Job Safety Audits (cont'd) B. Job Selection (cont'd) supervision as one of immediate concern, or jobs solicited from depart ment personnel as having potential for safety incidents, or new job requirements due to new, revised or additional job steps. C. Job Safety Audit 1. The audit committee meets in the Control Room or other designated area and discusses the job to be audited. The operator familiar with the job points out areas of concern, potential hazards he has observed, etc. 2. The committee goes to the job site. The operator performs the job as normally done. The committee observes steps and discusses things as observed during execution of the job. Operating procedures, facilities, job requirements, protective equipment used/needed and other pertinent safety aspects are assessed during this period. 3. The committee returns to the Control Room or other designated area and discusses observations about the job just audited. Potential problems are openly and candidly reviewed and recommended solutions acceptable to all members are agreed upon. Timing for non-mechanical changes is committed to at this time. 4. Department supervisor meets with area Maintenance Foreman/Supervisor for mechanical or engineering revisions. Timing for these items is agreed upon and committed to. 5. A one-page report (see typical format attached) is written up for subsequent review step. 11. Communicating Job Safety Audits A. Superintendent's Review 1. Each area General Superintendent holds a once/month Job Safety Audit review meeting. At this meeting: a. The department Supervisor with his/her Operating Superintendent/ M.T. Superintendent/Maintenance Supervisor presents his current audit and recommendations. General agreement on committed to results is achieved. Each supervisor with a current audit makes his/her presentation during this part of the meeting and is then s v. excused. SC 000408 LAM001605 Safety Procedures / Rules / or Standards Monsanto #35 Page 3 of 4 PROCEDURE: (cont'd) II. Communieating Job Safety Audits (cont'd) A. Superintendent's Review (cont'd) b. The Area Superintendent, M.T. Superintendent and area Maintenance Supervisor review status of all outstanding audits with the General Superintendent. Audit status is resolved and, if appropriate, changes to previously posted audits are authorized by the General Superintendent. 2. Each Department Supervisor issues his/her current audit after General Superintendent review meeting approval: a. one copy on JSA bulletin board. b. one copy in department JSA book, and c. copies to distribution list. Once the audit is posted on the JSA bulletin board it remains there until completed. Appropriate authorized revisions will be made to the bulletin board.and department JSA book copies as soon as available. When the audit recommendations are completed the bulletin board copy is stamped "completed" and left on the board for ten days to communicate status. It is then removed and filed. V 3. The Plant Manager holds quarterly review meetings. The status of all outstanding audits is reviewed. The scope and content of all completed audits are reviewed to ascertain general application to other plant operations. Ill. Executing Recommendations In addition to providing communication and training as increased awareness develops, it is expected that an effective Job Safety Audit program will generate procedural changes, minor mechanical revisions and some major mechanical changes. A. Procedure or process changes revisions to signs or personal protective equipment needs or any other recommendations within the control of the auditing department will be completed by department supervision. B. Mechanical Revisions: 1. Mechanical work covered by MRO will be submitted as a safety MRO. The Safety MRO will be designated by writing "JSA Recommendation" on the MRO. The timing commitment arrived at with area maintenance input will be written on the MRO, to allow prioritizing as needed. V 2. Mechanical work requiring PAFE or Engineering input will be submitted SC 000409 LA1V1001606 Safety Procedures / Rules / or Standards Monsanto #35 Page 4 of 4 PROCEDURE: (cont'd) III. Executing Recommendations (cont'd) B. Mechanical Revisions: (cont'd) on a Request for Estimate. The RFE will be clearly marked "JSA Recommendation" for proper assignment to designated JSA Co-op Engineering group. Committed timing should be clearly marked on the RFE for prioritizing. It is to be expected that mechanical inprovements requiring design or engineering work cannot be realistically assessed for completion before an engineering estimate is made. The JSA must have some target, however, as an initial best guess for this kind of work. It is appropriate to de signate "Engineering Work Required" on the JSA when it is posted, so delays do not significantly impact credibility. Delays for MRO or departmental recommendations should not be tolerated, however. SC 00041Q LAM001607 PRS #35 MONSANTOCOMPANY PORTPLASTICS PLANT JOB SAFETY AUDIT xc: S.d. Jackson G. Osterman D.W. Roberts ' DEPARTMENT __________ ' AUDIT NUMBER ________________ 1. Jobaudited ________________________________ __ 2. Committee ___________:__ 3. Day ____________________ Date ____________________ Time .4 Brief description of job ____________________________________________________________ 5. Hazards/problems uncovered by audit 6. Recommended action 7. Target date for completion 8. Date completed Supervisor SC 00041-j LAM001608 JOB SAFETY AUDITS The following Job Safety Audits have been completed in the Lustrex Area: AUDIT NO. DESCRIPTION 1 Loading a Hopper Car 2 Clearing a Rubber Cutter Jam 3 Draining a Vessel - DC Stripper 4 Making a Zinc Stearate Batch 5 Filling a Seal Pot 6 Operating the Bag Machine 8 Draining a Reflux Receiver 9 Loading a Bulk Truck 10 DI Stripper Filter Change 11 Loading a Spent Monomer Tank 12 R-l & R-2 Melt Sampling 13 Removing Char From Furnace 14 Clearing Jam on Palletizer LX--80--1 Putting Up a Stranding Line LX-80-2 Filling Peg 400 Tank LX-30-3 Chunking a Stranding Line LX-80-4 Changing Therminol Furnace Fuels LX-80-5 Clearing a Strand Cutter Jam LX-80-6 Making Up a Naugard Batch LX-80-7 Changing Foresberg Filters LX-80-S Replenishing Therminol Expansion Tank LX-80-9 Filling Catalyst Tank LX-80-10 Loading Bulk Trucks LX--80-11 'Retiming Rotex Screens LX-80-12 Hopper Car Puller LX-81-13 Filling the Molten Stearic Acid Tank LX-81-14 Loading the Bag Magazine 'LX-81-15 Pumping Waste 21 LX-81-16 Charging Caustic Wash System SC 000412 LAM001609 JOB SAFETY AUDITS The following Job Safety Audits have been completed in the Lustrex area: AUDIT NO. LX 82-01 LX 82-02 LX 82-03 LX 82-04 LX 82-05 LX 82-06 LX 82-07 LX 82-08 LX 82-09 LX 83-01 LX 83-02 LX 83^03 LX 83-04 LX 83-.0.5 LX ?3-OG L* ?7-d>7 l * P3 -OS' L* S>H-oi Lx DESCRIPTION Rate Check DC Reflux Purge System Palletizer and Associated Conveyors Screen Changing Hopper Car Puller Preparing T66 Line Charging of Stearic Acid to Melt Tank Charging TBC Solution to Underground SM Tank Transferring of Purge Monomer from Under ground Tank to A-2 Tank Changing Package Line Forsberg Filters Staging Drums Changing Bulk Area Forsberg Filters Changing Rubber Filter Basket Pellet Sampling at the Rotex Rubber Solution filter Changing Loath y flu.yb<r-Co nueyor fiopptr- Cay Loc.Ji{ru3 Ca.rpky /y)tancmcr -fra ^ A 2. \ U.\de rjr 0^)v?r-cci>C.i Car-LOn L> rt & fiddly TC Aa T~Xrks SC 000413 LAM001610