Document wrpV2rwQ9bx6NQGqNZzNYRaND

IWOWEUHATKO Wilmington, Delaware 19898 EMPLOYEE RELATIONS DEPARTMENT November 19, 1980 RECORDING ASBESTOS-RELATED CONDITIONS ON OSHA FORM 200 In light of an intensified medical detection program to identify asbestos-related conditions, additional cases of asbestosrelated abnormalities and illnesses will probably be revealed. Safety Fire Protection Guideline 11,1, "Classifying and - Reporting Occupational Injuries and Illnesses", Section`2.3, describes conditions which must be met for tabulating and log ging on OSHA Form 200 (U.S. only) occupational illnesses. In applying"this paragraph, all Du Pont work-related instances of asbestosrrelated abnormalities, whether judged "benign asymp tomatic"', "benign symptomatic", or "malignant", should be considered tabulatable and recorded on Form 200 (U.S. only). ' Tabulating and recording the benign asymptomatic abnormality is a change in practice. Du Pont's Medical Division does not regard the Benign Asymp tomatic Abnormality as an illness, and thus, our practice has been that of not logging. OSHA, however, maintains that this condition is loggable and has issued citations for failure to log. The change in logging practice is an administrative procedural change to avoid future citations, and does not reflect a change in Medical Division's position on the significance of the benign asymptomatic condition. The attached Guidelines "For the Management of Chronic Occupa tional Illnesses" and "For the Diagnosis and Classification of Asbestos-Related Medical Cases", published by the Medical Division are provided as background information materials. DUP 0810388 I There's a world of things we're doing something about DU 009378 The past practice of submitting Non-Tabulatable G-105's for benign asymptomatic asbestos-related cases should be dis continued. Accounting for medical expenses is described in Part 10 of the Service Manual. Questions on logging and classifying injuries and illnesses should be referred to D. G. Windsor, 774-5050, or J. I. Weir 774-2234. -' SAFETY FIRE PROTECTION DIVISION - . --------r Attachments TO: DEPARTMENT HEADS OSH COORDINATORS PRODUCTION/PLANT MANAGERS LABORATORY DIRECTORS SAFETY SUPERVISORS ? DUP 0810389 i x DU 009379 GUIDELINES FOR THE MANAGEMENT OF CHRONIC OCCUPATIONAL ILLNESSES When a medical examination of an employee or pensioner suggests a chronic illness which might have arisen out of and in the course of Du Pont employment, the site physician and site management should implement the procedure stated below. Medical Division guidelines for specific causal agents should be consulted as appropriate. ` 1. DIAGNOSIS The site physician should establish the diagnosis and degree of disability, if any, by a review of all pertinent data and consultation with the Medical Division. The diagnosis and degree of disability should be verified by appropriate medical specialists. . -' 2. CAUSALITY A comprehensive work history for the employee should be prepared by the site physician and site management and examined for a causal agent. Non-Du Pont exposures should also be identified where possible. It is the responsibility of site and departmental management, with advice from the Medical Division and appropriate consultants, to determine causality as promptly as possible. ' This determination and the exposure history should be made a permanent part of the employee's medical record. T-1 DUP 0810390 DU 009380 2 u, \ 3. EMPLOYEE NOTIFICATION The Du Pont Guidelines to Physicians on Informing Employees of Abnormal Findings should be followed and the employee or pensioner should be promptly notified of Du Pont's determination of causality. If there is an unavoidable delay in determining causality, employee notification of the known facts should not be postponed. Employee notification should be documented in the medical record. 4. MEDICAL MANAGEMENT AND COSTS If the causality is related to Du Pont employment, and if a preempting national health plan is not in place, the site should accept the responsibility for costs of -appropriate medical ^ evaluation, follow up, and treatment. In those cases in which causality has not been determined, site management may choose to assume the costs for appropriate medical evaluation by a medical specialist approved by site management. If the causality is non-Du Pont, the case should be treated as any other non-occupational illness. The employee should be notified as stated above and assisted in seeking and receiving appropriate medical follow up with a private physician. 5. RECORDING REQUIREMENTS A. U.S. - Recording in OSHA Log An illness with a Du Pont causality should be logged in the OSHA' log? an illness with a non-Du Pont causality should not be logged. Regulations require logging within DU 009381 DUP 0810391 4 obtaining workers' compensation or other state or federal disability benefits to which the employee may be entitled. Matters of employee compensation should be reviewed with Employee Relations and Legal through normal channels. Site job transfer and pay practices should be followed when an employee is temporarily or permanently placed on another job. 9/13/79 DUP 0810393 yrr--:----------y-vug.r. .lBafil, T-4 DU 009383 GUIDELINES FOR- THE DIAGNOSIS AND CLASSIFICATION OF ASBESTOS-RELATED MEDICAL CASES This guideline supplements the Guidelines for the Management of Chronic Occupational Illnesses (1). This guideline covers those asbestos-related conditions listed below. Use of this classification should be restricted to those cases in which there is evidence of probable asbestos exposure Benign Asymptomatic Abnormalities; Pleural thickening and/or plagues and/or calcification with no evidence of parenchymal disease Benign Symptomatic Illnesses: . Presumptive asbestosis Confirmed asbestosis Exudative pleural thickening Pleural effusion Malignant Illnesses; Mesothelioma of the pleura or peritoneum Carcinoma of the lung, larynx, or gastrointestinal tract (stomach, colon) A presumptive diagnosis of asbestosis is one in which there is good evidence of.parenchymal disease due to asbestos exposure even though there is no interstitial fibrosis noted on x-ray. Such a case would include pleural x-ray changes, symptoms," 4. abnormal spirometry and/or abnormal blood gases. Accepted medical practice and NIOSH guidelines suggest that a confirmed diagnosis of asbestosis should be made only with the presence of x-ray changes of interstitial fibrosisT' symptoms (dyspnea T cough, etc.), physical DUP 0810394 U- 1 DU 009384 2 findings (rales, etc.), impaired pulmonary function (abnormal ~ spirometry or blood gases), and a positive exposure history (2, 3). A comprehensive history of probable exposure to asbestos and other pulmonary irritants should be obtained by the physician from the patient at the time of the examination. (This history will assist in the determination of causality as well as aiding in the diagnosis.) The history should include all possible pre-Du Pont occupational exposure and off-the-job asbestos-related exposure(4). A detailed evaluation of smoking habits should be made. A supplemental work history should be prepared by site management listing all periods and/or circumstances of possible asbestos exposure. If the employee was not assigned to a job that involved handling asbestos-containing materials, an attempt should be made to determine whether the employee could have incurred exposure by working near an operation where asbestos dust was released. In determining when and whether causal exposure could have occurred, it should be borne in mind that asbestos-related disorders can result not only from long-term moderate exposure but also from short-term massive exposure. In all cases where the tentative diagnosis is a benign symptomatic illness or a malignant illness and in other cases if the evaluation is inconclusive, the tentative diagnosis should be discussed with the Medical Division. Where appropriate, the site should use an approved medical specialist to carry out the additional testing or evaluation required to establish a diagnosis. U- 2 DUP 0810395 DU 009385 3 The scope of further testing will normally be determined by the specialist, but should include certain minimum tests. A suggested referral letter indicating these tests is attached. Where an asbestos-related lung abnormality of Du Pont causality has been established, the follow up should at a minimum include a semi-annual posterior-anterior and lateral chest x-ray, and pulmonary function tests. If the employee refuses, this fact should be documented in the employee's medical record. Those employees with confirmed asbestosis, exudative pleural thickening, pleural effusion or malignant illnesses should be excluded from tasks with potential for exposure to asbestos. Those with benign asymptomatic abnormalities need not be excluded. Those with presumptive asbestosis should be handled on an individual basis. .. REFERENCES 1. Medical Division, Du Pont Employee Relations Department, "Guidelines for Physicians", Section T. 2. Preger, L., et al, "Asbestos-Related Disease", publisher Grune & Stratton, New York, 1978. 3. NIOSH, "A Guide to the Work-Relatedness of Disease", Rev. Edicion, January 1979. 4. National Cancer Institute, "Asbestos: An Information Resource", May 1978. DUP 0810396 U- 3 DU 009386 Dear Dr. , an employee of the Du Pont , is referred for pulmonary evaluation. Chest x-ray findings have been interpreted as containing some abnormalities. In your evaluation, the following minimums are requested: A detailed history of occupational and nonoccupational exposures, including smoking history. Examination of the lungs. Review of recent chest x-rays that include right and left oblique views. Complete ventilatory function testing without and with a bronchodilator. Measurement of arterial blood gases at rest, and after exercise. A statement of your evaluation ofr the respiratory impairment, if any. The etiology of the condition. Please send your bill for this service (examination, testing, and x-rays) and the report to me. If the employee requests that a copy of your report be sent to his or her personal physician, please ask that this request be submitted in writing to me. A copy of your report will then be sent from our office. Please return our x-rays by certified mail. Very truly yours, DUP 0810397 U-4 DU 009387 11/3/83 EMPLOYEE STANDBY STATEMENT OSHA ASBESTOS EMERGENCY TEMPORARY STANDARD (ETS) The Occupational Safety and Health Administration (OSHA) announced yesterday its promulgation of an Emergency Temporary Standard (ETS) reducing the Permissible Exposure Limit (PEL) for asbestos from the previous 2 fibers per cubic centimeter to 0.5 F/cc. The ETS is effective Friday, November 4, 1983, and allows the use of respirators to achieve compliance. Du Pont, has not yet received or reviewed a copy of the ETS and so further information is not yet available. We have reviewed personnel and area air monitoring for asbestos at the site, and find we are in compliance with the new ETS. Respirators will continue to be used wherever the potential exists for releasing airborne asbestos fibers over the ETS PEL of 0.5F/cc. We will inform you of any new developments when the emergency standard has been reviewed. 60 DUP 0810398 "SAFETY IS MY RESPONSIBILITY" DU 009388