Document wqQ86azr0942n37NeRbL84n3V
FILE NAME: Abex (ABX) DATE: 1972 Oct DOC#: ABX089 DOCUMENT DESCRIPTION: Internal Inspection Report-Abex Corp. Industrial Hygiene Survey, American Brakeblok Division
ABEX CORPORATTOfJ INDUSTRIAL HYGIENE SDRVRV Am e r i c a n b r a k e b l o k d i v i s i o n
WINCHESTER. VTPnTWTA PCTOBBR 2-6. 1972
Original; CCt
C. B. Mallory i/" C. C,, Blackwell, Jr., M.D. C. H. Boreherding, Jr. A. A. Borin E. H. Feierabend
D. K. Bannte
G. L. Botnine P. E. Taylor J. J. Walsh -- IC Industries G. A. Zania -- The Travelers
SPNY 000527
SCF-ABX-1520
ABEX CORPORATION INDUSTRIAL HYGIENE SURVEY AMERICAN BRAKBBLOK DIVISION
WINCHESTER. VIRGINIA OCTOBER 2-6. 1972
PURPOSE
This survey provides coverage of the majority of operations in the' plant to determine the extent of asbestos exposure to plant personnel. One additional survey will be scheduled in the near future to empiete the evaluation.
Several of the asbestos samples collected from locations pro cessing lead compounds were also selected for analysis to determine airborne lead concentrations at various operations.
SUMMARY
Personal samples were collected at a majority of operations throughout the plant including Strip Finishing, Block Preform, Block Press, Block Finish, Block Inspection & Packaging, com pounding, Book Preform, and Disc Brake Manufacturing, in addition, a personal sample was also taken from the operator of the mobile Tennant sweeper during routine sweeping opera tions. The sweeper was emptied of collected dust twice during the 66-minute sampling period.
To verify that airborne asbestos levels were below permissible limits, general air samples were collected from work and
traffic areas in shipping and Receiving and in the Machine * Shop.
Referring to the results in the Analyses of Air Samples for
Asbestos, 24 of the 72 samples reported exceeded the 5 fiber/ml
10 exposure limit.
of the fiber
"c" Of these 24 samples,
ceiling
limit.
seven
(7) were
in excess
Although the majority of the exposures were confined to Book Preform, Block Preform, and the Block Finish Department, ex cursions were also encountered at the Automatic preform machines in Disc Brake Manufacturing, and at the controls of the Tennant Sweeper.
SPNY 000528
As pointed out in our previous reports, the eight hour fr weighted average exposure limit established by OSHA will be reduced from 5 fibers/ml to 2 fibers/ml on July 1, 1976. During this survey, a total of 60 personal samples, represent ing 8336 of all samples collected, exceeded this projected exposure limit. The plant should anticipate the 1976 reduction of the permissible limit. Plans for expansion of existing exhaust ventilation systems or provision of additional engineer ing controls should be based on the projected 2 fiber limit.
Analysis of the personal samples for lead disclosed no con
centrations exceeding the proposed or "intended" threshold
limit of .15 mg/K3. In most instances, a number of samples
from each of the designated work areas were tested. None
contained more than trace concentrations of lead. Control of
exposure to airborne lead appears to be adequate at the present
time.
"
DISCUSSION
Block Preform samples were collected on both the first and second shifts. As indicated, highest concentrations were encountered at Block Preform Machine N0 . p-4 operated by . D. Jeffries. >(Refer to sample numbers 45, 52, and 56.) Three samples were collected in aeries over three short time inter vals to avoid filter loading and resultant masking of the fibers during analysis. This work station was selected for short term sampling because of the poor personal hygiene exhibited by the operator. Spillage, scattering, and genera tion of airborne particulates was most noticeable at this location.
Excessive concentrations encountered in the Block Preform Department may be partially attributed to the personal work habits and housekeeping practices of the individual operators. However, local exhaust systems at all work stations should be improved to affect maximum capture of airborne contaminants. Present design at each Block Preform unit consists of a flared exhaust hood suspended above the preform bench. Al though face velocity is adequate, the design and location of the hood permits capture of only a fraction of the airborne material being generated during the preform cycle. In addition, an open, branch exhaust trunk is connected to the ventilation duct above the flared hood, but is serving no useful purpose at the present time. No ventilation is provided for the adjacent
bin and weigh scale where a large share of the manual opera tions are conducted..
-2-
SPNY 000529
As point source collection of airborne asbestos fibers is not feasible clue to the inherent design of the Preform units, en closure of the presses and/or redesign of the existing hoods above the preform benches may be an acceptable alternative. Exhaust ventilation should also be provided at the mix and weigh scales. Intimate handling during this phase of the preform cycle contributes significantly to the total exposure.
Automation of all" or any part of the preform cycle should be investigated as a possible means of eliminating exposures.
Samples numbered 25 through 32 were collected at representative work stations throughout the Block Finish Department, including Inspection and Packaging and the Printer Machine. As Indicated, four of the eight samples exceeded the 5 fiber limit. Ex posures in this department can be primarily attributed to continuous handling of the dusty brake shoes, although grind ing and drilling may be contributing incidentally to the air borne concentrations. Please note the increased concen trations collected from inspection and Packaging where exposure is caused exclusively by handling.
To control asbestos exposures in Block Finishing, the blocks should be thoroughly cleaned by brushing, vacuuming, and/or the use of enclosed air pressure prior to extensive handling in the Block Finish Department. Final removal of loose material should also be done after block, finishing and before the shoes are inspected and packaged for shipment.
Hone of the samples collected in General Compounding exceeded
the 5 fiber limit, although two of the samples closely approached
it. (Refer to sample Hos. 20 & 57} Also please note that all
but three of the Compounding samples exceeded the projected
limit of 2 fibers/ml.
.
* t
To aid reducing airborne asbestos fibers throughout General Compounding., the feasibility of bulk storage of asbestos should be investigated in conjunction with enclosed conveyance or vacuum transport of the fibers. The elimination of bagged asbestos would decrease required handling and at the same time limit personnel exposures. It is our understanding that as bestos in compressed pellet form is available as a possible replacement for the loose fibrous product. If adaptable to brake shoe manufacturing processes, use of the pelletized product should be seriously considered.
-3-
SPNY 000530
Referring to pages 5 and 6 of the Appendix Book Preform samples exhibited higher concentrations than those encountered daring previous survey*. This condition may have resulted from cold weather closure of exterior openings supplemented hy direct air disturbance from the Dravo make-up air unit adjacent to the Preform machines. However the reduced sampling time of the more recent samples may also be a factor. Prolonged collection tends to overload the filter, masking * the fibers during analysis of the sample. Filter loading is especially common in areas where increased concentrations of airborne particulates are generated.
Reduction of elevated asbestos concentrations in Book Preform esquire increased enclosure of the existing hoods above
the preform units. All sides including a portion of the open front should be enclosed, in addition, the sides of the hoods should be extended downward to provide greater capture of as bestos dust generated during the pressing cycle. Adequate hooding should also be considered for the mix bins and weigh scales where intimate handling is a problem. Design and engin eering considerations should include the possibility of of all or any part of the preform cycle as a means of reducing or eliminating exposures.
* In Disc Brake Manufacturing, two automatic preform mnrh-infv? were sampled. Both units disclosed concentrations exceeding the 5 fiber limit. Intimate handling is a prohiem at these locations, and provision of additional ventilation should be considered.
A personal sample was collected from the Tennant sweeper
operator during normal sweeping operations. The mobile sweeper
was emptied of collected dust at least twice during the sampling
period.
3
It is apparent that the majority of the exposure to the opera
tor is incurred while emptying the unit. Heavy concentrations of airborne dust are generated while this activity is in progress.
Until further samples can be collected to determine sweeping and dumping exposures separately, the operator should be re quired to wear respiratory protection. In addition, the Tennant Sweeper should be emptied outside the pisuit in a pro tected area where scattering or spreading of airborne asbestos can be minimized.
--4 --
SPNY 000531
Methods of compliance, and required control measures were dis cussed on our previous Industrial Hygiene Survey Report dated
1972` P1`*" " t. ttat the r e ^ i r e S e at that tome apply to all areas listed in this report where asbestos concentrations exceed 5 fibers per milliliter.
copy J the Occupational Safety and Health Standards in
digest form is attached.
Our thanks to Charlie Mallory, Bob Brown, Charles Curtis, and associates for the cooperation extended during the survey.
12/27/72
SURVEY CONDUCTED BY:
M. David Gidley Industrial Hygienist
APPROVED BY: c. H . Borcherding, J'r. ^Ur-lnd.Hyg./Xioss Prevention
SPNY 000532
JKDUS^HIAL HYGIENE SURVEY ABEX CORPORATTOTJ
GLOSSARY
^-approved - Approved by the United States Bureau of Mines
BZ .
- Breathing zone
cfm
~ Cubic feet per minute
dB
- Decibels-symbol denoting the relative
intensity of sound pressure levels (re
0.0002 dyne/square centimeter)
fpm
- Peet per minute
GRA
tag/v?
mppcf ppm PS
~ General room atmosphere
- Milligrams per cubic meter of air - Million particles per cubic foot of air - - Parts per million by volume - Personal sample
TLV Threshold limit value for an 8-hour daily exposure
Ventilation
- The terms ventilated, ventilating, or
exhaust imply the use of mechanical means such as a fan for air movement, unless otherwxse noted.
SPNY 000533
)
V-
)
M A L V S E S OP AIR gAMPLRg
METHOD OP COLLECTION'
FOR Asbestos
Membrane filter with C-llO Pump at 2 LPM
METHOD OP ANALYSIS*
Phase Contrast Microscopy
<
DATE ANALYZED* 10/19-11/17/72 ANALYST* M. D. Gidley
TLV* 5 fibars/ml^ %u in length
ssaBjjL-lfe,-, , Field liSfe,,- . Date
1 2715 10/2/72
*\ 2716 10/2/72
__Ti-tte 9r49 AM
11:24 AM
9s34 AM
TotalfM3) Air Vol.
.180 Strip Finishing
.202 Strip Finishing
Fibers/m
Cone.
PAfflUrVft
2.45 Coil Saw #1 - Franklin Washington
2.36 Coil Saw # 2 - 0 Ryan
11:20 AM
3 2717 10/2/72 9:37 AM .204 Strip Finishing 2.09 Coil Saw #3 - E Kenney
11:23 AM
4 2718 10/2/72 9:40 AM .192 Strip Finishing 2-48 Do-All saw #7 - Lloyd Kinnia
11:24 AM
5 2719
10/2/72 9:44 AM 11*21 AM
.189
Strip Finishing
1.09 Coil Saw #4 - Johnny Allowact
6 2720 10/2/72 9:56 AM
11:07 AM 7 2721 10/2/72 12':17 PM
2:52 PM 8 2722 10/2/72 12:14 PM
.141 Strip Finishing
.291 .305
Block Preform Machine #4 Block Preform
OS 3.81
Backing Saw #12 - Albert Crosen
Loaded filter. Collection too heavy fof accurate fiber count Operator - Joe Roksandieh
2:51 PM
Machine #3
,
9 2723 10 2724
10/2/72 10/2/72
12:17 PM 2:52 PM 12:20 PM
.301 .301
Block Preform Macntns #2 Block Preform
3.8 ----
6.3*
Opei rator - Leonard Good
Operator - Orndorff
2:53 PM 11 2725 10/2/72 12:24 PM
2:54 PM
.292'
Machine #9 Block preform Machine #8
Opferator -* Carl Strosnider
13 2726 10/2/72 12:30 PM .283 Block Preform
6.3* Operator - Blane Wolford
2:53 PM
Machine #13
I
I
{*) Concentration in excess of TLV.
.
(**) Concentration in excess of ceiling "c" Limit
SPNY 000535
)
-2-
ftNAItVSgS QP AIR SAMPLES
METHOD OP COLLECT!OHt*
f o r -- Asbestos._________
Membrane Filter with C-110 pump at 2 LPM METHOD OP ANALYSIS
Phase Contrast Microscopy
DATS ANALYZED* 10/19-11/17/72 ANALYST* M. D. Qidley TLVt 5 f ibers/ml >5^ in length
Samol .NO Field Lab,
14 2727
Date LO/2/72
2728 L0/3/72 36 2729 L0/3/72
45 2730 LO/4/72
52 2731 LO/4/72 4
56 2732 LO/4/72
37 2733 LO/4/72
38 2734 LO/4/72
39 2735 LO/4/72
41 2736 LO/4/72
42 2737 10/4/72
51 2738 10/4/72
Time
TotaliM-*'[BZ samples unies otherwise noted
Air Vol. Location
12:44 PM .246
ilock Preform
2:50 PM
Service
4:05 PM .145
Slock Preform
5:16 PM
lach.P-11 (2nd sh:.
4:13 PM .136 slock Preform
520 PM
12*:2T ~PM ' .58
lach.#l(2nd shift 3lock Preform
12:51 PM
tech. P-4
12:51 Ph} .53
3lock Preform
1:16 PM
tech. P-4
1:16 PM 0.55 Blpck Preform
1:42 PM
tech. P-4
8:09 AM .334 3lock Press
11:05 At1
tech.B-10,B-ll
8:12 AM .334 3lock Press
11:05 AK
tech. B-4
,
8:16 AM .323 Block Press
11:04 Ah
Mach C-4.C-5
8:30 AM .302 Block Press
11:09 Ah
Mach. C-8
8:34 AM .293 Block Pjress
11:06 Ah
Mach. C-13.C-14
12:55 Ph .222 Block Press
2:44 PM
Deburring
'Fiber s/m Cone.
3.9
7.7* :tT~
8.1*
26.4**
22*. 0**
21*. 7**
2.9 1.4
2.4
2_o
2.6 ' ' 473
. Service man - Harry Kackley Operator-B. Reynolds Operator - John Thomas Operator - Jeffries Operator - Jeffries Operator - Jeffries Press Operator - E. Shanholtz
Press Operator - Walter Gray Press Operator __ Kenneth Burkhart Press Operator - Milford Michael Press Operator - Clifton Spaid Operator - W. Haines
{*) Concentration in excess of TLV.
.
(**) Concentration in excess of ceiling "c" Limit
I
SPNY
)
)
)
-3-
MMYfiBS OP M R
METHOD OF COLLECTION*
FOR Asbestos
Membrane Filter with c-110 pump at 2 LPM
METHOD OP ANALYSIS*
Phase.Contrast Microscopy
SAMPLBfi
DATE ANALYZED 10/19-11/17/72 ANALYST* M, D. Qidley
TLVi S fibers/ml > S/< in length
Sample Wo.
U l
25 2739
- 2740
21 2741
* 28 2742 29 2743 30 2744 31 2745
2746 17 2747 18 2748 19 2749
10/3/72
10/3/72
10/3/72
10/3/72 10/3/72 10/3/72 10/3/72 10/3/72 10/3/72 10/3/72 10/3/72
___Time 12 39 PM 3:15 PM
1243 PM 3*16 PM
12 *45 PM 3 :13 PM
12*49 PM 3*14 PM 12*53 PM 3*17 PM 12*56 PM 3*18 PM 1*01 PM 3*19 PM 12*58 PM 3*20 PM 8*09 AM 11*18 AM 8*15 AM 11*22 AM 8*18 AM 11*24 AM
Total(MJ: samples uniec otherwise noted)
3Fibers/r
l
Air vol. .Location
Cono.
Remarks
.314 Block Finish
5.5* Operator - F. W. Macomber
(Hammond Radius 1Grinder No. *1)
.307
Block Finish (Hammond Finish
8.8* Operator - r . Bingaman
Grinder)
.293
Block Finish (No.l Multiple
3,13 Operator - Billy Strother--- -----
.287 .289
Rivet Hole drill)
Block Finish(No. 2
Spring Hole Drill ) Block Finish(No.
F-16 Hand drill)
4.6 3.25
Operator - Ronald Turner Operator - H. Doleman
.281
Block Finish (Printer Machine)
"5,84* Operator - Donald Largent
.273
Block Finish (Mil 1 3.07 Operator - W. L. Smith Groove Machine)
.281
lock Inspection and Packaging
8.1* Inspector - Arnold Nesmith . {
.348
Compounding-First floor. ` . .
2.14 Dry< Line Operator - Porter
-- .352
CompoundingSecond floor
0.98 Powder Pumper - Gene Kline
.361
CompoundingSecond floor
0.58
Powder Pumper - Byron Billmyre -------------------- ----- --- ----
(*) Concentration in excess of TLV. {*) Concentration in excess of ceiling "c" Limit
c\
I
SPNY 000537 '
)
1
)
-4 -
M A L Y S R S OF AIR SAMPLES
METHOD OP COLLECTION
FOR Asbestos
Membrane Filter with c-110 Pump at 2 LPM METHOD OF ANALYSISt
Phase Contrast Microscopy
DATE ANALYZD|104*-11/17/72 ANALYST M. D. Gidlay TLVt 5 fibers/ml > 5/t in length
3aim>l< No. ?ield iab. 20 2750
2751 23 2752 24 2753 57 2754 58 2755 59 2756 60 2757 6S 2758 66 2759 71 2760 43 2761
-- .P M * ,
.0/3/72 10/3/72 10/3/72 10/3/72 10/5/72 10/5/72 10/5/72 10/5/72 10/5/72 10/5/72 10/5/72 10/4/72
Time 8:25 AM 11:15 AM 8:29 AM 11:26 AM 8:35 AM 11:45 AM 8:39 AM 11:33 AM 8:18 AM 12:30 PM 8:21 AM 12:26 PM 8:27 AM 12:28 PM 8:30 AM 12:27 PM 11:43 AM 12:43 PM 11:45 AM 2:28 PM 12:43 PM 2:27 PM 8:44 AM 11:28 AM
Total(M3 Air Vol.
.326
.343
.360
.323
.404
.387
.472
.399
.119 I
.323' t
.258
.310
(BZ Samples unle
CompoundingSecond Floor Compounding Second Floor Compounding First Floor Compounding Second Floor Compounding First Floor Compounding Rubber Mill #3 Compounding Rubber Mill #2 Compounding -
Rubber Mill #2 l
Compounding80 Mix Cabinets Compounding80 Mix Cabinets Compounding80 Mix Cabinets Book Preform (Heat & Pressure Inspection)
sFibers/
Cor^t 4.72
,,Remarks Asbestos Weigher - S. A. Dodson
1.15 Powder Weigher - Earl Largent
2.0 2.96-- 4.96
Mix Box service man-H. B. Hisghman
W0trTrtlSS"{Jperator - c. Bean
Meter Operator _ Frank McDaniel
2.14 Operator - F. Bly
2.6 Operator - John dowser
14
3.54
IX
3.14
Operator - M. Estep
Operator - Paul brooks
Operator - j. Cheshire
Operator - Paul Brooks
2.65 Inspector - J. Gardner
(*) Concentration in excess of TLV. (**) Concentration in excess of ceiling "C" Limit
I
)
)
)
SPNY 000538
ANALYAB8 OP AIR SAMPLES
METHOD OP COLLECTION*
P0R--- AshestOB_________
Membrane Filter with c-110 Pump at 2 LPM
METHOD OP ANALYSIS* Phase Contrast Microscopy
DATE ANALYZED* 10/19-11/17/72 ANALYST* M. D. Gidley TLV* 5 fibers/ml > 5 * in length
Samel No Field Lab,
44 2762
f ' 2763
62 2764 63 2765 73 2766
74 2767
75 2768
2769
77 2770
78 2771
-- ft*; 10/4/72 10/5/72 10/5/72 10/5/72 10/5/72
10/5/72
10/5/72 10/5/72
10/5/72 10/5/72
Time 8*49 AM 10:59 AM 8*51 AM 10:36 AM 8*54 AM 10*37 AM 8*58 AM 10*35 AM 4*05 PM 5*29 PM
4*07 PM 5*30 PM
4*14 PM 5*32 PM
4*17 PM 5*33 PM
4*11 PM 5*31 PM
4*22 PM 5*34 PM
Total(Mt
Air Voi. .247 Book Preform (Vertical saw) .203 Book Preform Mach.Nos. 2, 6 .202 Book Preform Mach. Nos. 3, 7
- --195" " "Book'preforra Mach. Nos.11, 15
.166 Book Preform Mach.Nos. 11, is (second shift)
.163 Book Preform
Mach.Nos.12,16 (Second shift) .154 Book Preform Mach.Nos.1, 5 , (second shift) .149 Book Preform Mach.Nos. 2, 6 (saaond shift) .161 Book Preform Mach.Nos.9, 13 (second shift) .145 Book Preform Mach. Nos. 3,7 (second shift!
SFibers/r Cone.
7.26* 3.05 2.05 7.85 Ifti*
10.5**
-7.24*
1*8*
10.,7**
12.5 * *
-Remarks Saw Operator - J. M. Anderson Operator w. L. Clark Operator - Robert Nave Operator - R. P. Putnam Operator - Ricky Ratliffe
Operator - w. Carlyle *
Operator - Lee Oates
Operator - Pat Votpe-- -
Operator - Mildred Hickey
Operator - R. Gillespie
(*) Concentration in excess of TLV. (**) Concentration in excess of ceiling "c" Limit
SPNY 000539
)
)
-6-
METHOD OP COLLECTION* Membrane Filter with c-110
METHOD OP ANALYSIS* Phase Contrast Microscopy
Pump at
MftLYSES QP M R FOR Asbeatoa
2 LPM
SAMPLES
DATE ANALYZED*10/19-ll/17/72 ANALYST* M. D. Gidley TLV* 5 fibers/ml>5* in length
amp; B--NO. Field Lab.
79 2772
od 2773
46 2774
47 2775
48 2776
49 2777
50 2778 86 2779 67 2780
Date 10/5/72 10/5/72 10/4/72 10/4/72
10/4/72 10/4/72 10/4/72 10/6/72 10/5/72
Tima 4*20 PM 5*35 PM
4:25 PM 5*36 PM
12*34 PM 2*50 PM
12*35 PM 2*51 PM
12*39 PM 2:53 PM
12*42 PM 2*52 PM
12*45 PM 2*54 PM 12:09 PM 1*15 PM 12*23 PM 3*27 PM
Total (M-* I'BZ Samples unie oterw|ennoted)
.51
Book Preform Mach.Nos.'4, 8
^Fibers/njl . 8.7* Operator
- Paul
.. ........... --
_ Meadows
Second Shift)
.143
Book Preform Mach.Nos.17,19
13.1** Operator - Daniel McKenzie
(Second shift)
.283
Di sc Brake Mfg. (Automatic Pre
a*
Operator - D. H. Clark
form Mach. #2)
.276
Disc Brake Mfg. (Automatic Pre
^3_*
Operator - R. L. Dove
form Mach. #5)
.272
Disc Brake Mfg. (Disc Brake Pres; i -
Operator - w. T. Wood
No.D-4 Side 1)
.264 Disc Brake Mfg.. 3.3
Operator - pavid Brown
(Disc Brake Pres
0
#D-4, Side 2)
.262 Disc Brake Mfg. 2-4
Disc'Brake Sprvice Man-Donald Clar::
.125 .361
Tennant,Sweeper
Machine Shop (Gen.Area sample
5.9* 1.5
Collected during sweeping, and dumping of collected dust.
Collected at south side of machine shop.
(*) Concentration in excess of TLV. (**) Concentration in excess of ceiling "c" Limit
I
SPNY 000540
)
)
)
ANALYSES OP AIR
METHOD OP COLLECTION*
POR
Asbestos
Membrane Filter with C-110 Pump at 2 LPM
METHOD OP ANALYSIS*
Phase Contrast Microscopy
DATE ANALYSED* 10/19-11/17/72 ANALYST* M. D. Gidley TLV* 5 fibers/ml > *. in length
2782
10/6/72
12*14 PM 3*27 PM 8*28 AM 12*58 PM
83 _27a3 10/6/72 8*36 AM 1*01 PM
84 2784 10/6/72 8*45 AM 1*00 PM
85 2785 10/6/72 8*41 AM 1*02 PM
.493 .492 .475
iQcatior
Machine shop (Gen. area sampl Shipping & Stor age (Gen. area sample) * Shipping & Stor age (Gen. area sample)
Shipping & stor age (gen. area sample) Shipping & stor age (Gen. area sample)
0.9 )
.07
0.16
0.15
0.16
Collected at north side of machine shop. Front of -shipping area (south) .
East aide of building.
Southeast corner adjacent to scale*
Center aisle.
(*) Concentration in excess of TLV, (**) Concentration in excess of ceiling "C" Limit
I
)
)
)
MM.Y6BS OF AIR BAHPffip
METHOD OH COLLECTION*
F0R---LEAD tm aTP
Membrane filter with C-110 pump at 2 LPM METHOD OP ANALYSIS:
Atomic Absorption
1
DATE ANALYZED: 10/19/72 ANALYST: M. Desoukey TLV:.15 mg/M3 (Intended)
10/2/72 12:17 PM .291 Block Preform
Trace
. Remarks_____
a. (0
2:52 PM
Machine #4
Operator - w. Jeffries
. 8 2674 10/2/72 12:14 PM .305 2:51 PM
Block Pfeform
Trace Operator - Joe Roksandich
9 2675 10/2/72 12:17 PM .301
Machine #3 Block Preform
2:52 PM 10 2676 10/2/72 12:20 PM .301
Machine #2
Traoe Operator - Leonard Good
2:53 PM
Block Preform Machine #9
Trace Operator - Orndorff
11 2677 10/2/72 12:24 PM] .292 Block Preform
Trace
2:54 PM 13 2678 10/2/72 12:30 PM
Machine #8
Operator - carl Strosnider
2:53 PM 35 2678 10/3/72 4:05 PM
.283 .145
Block Preform Machine #13 Block Preform
.0024 Operator - Blane Wolford
5:16 PM
Machine #P-U
Trace Operator - B. Reynolds
36 2680 10/3/72 4:17 PM 5:20 PM
.136
(second shift) Block Preform. Machine #1
Trace Operator - John Thomas
45 2681 10/4/72 12:23 PM .58
12:51 PM 52 2682 10/4/72 12:51 PM .53.
1:16 PM 56 2683 10/4/72 1:16 PM
0.55
1:42 PM
(second shift) Block Preform Machine #P-4 Block. Preform Machine #P~4 Block Preform Machine #P-4
Trace Trace Trace
Operator - Jeffries Operator - Jeffries Operator - Jeffries
Concentration in excess of TLV.
SPNY 000542
)
)
-2 *
&B&ftYgBg OP AIR SAMPLES
METHOD OP COLLECTION*
FOE-- LEAD IN ATft______
Membrane filter with C-110 pump at 2 LPM
METHOD OP ANALYSIS*
Atomic Absorption
DATE ANALY2BD* 10/19/72 ANALYST* M. Desoukey TLV* .15 mg/M3 (intended)
gann9 NO. Field Lab.
37 2684 .'8 2685 51 2686 25 2687
31 2688
32 2689 17 2690 18 2691 19 2692 21 2693 22 2694
Date 10/4/72 10/4/72 10/4/72 10/3/72
10/3/72
10/3/72 10/3/72 10/3/72 10/3/72 10/3/72
*10/3/72
8 t09 AM 11:05 AM 8:12 AM 11:05 AM 12:55 PM 2:44 PM 12:39 PM 3:15 PM
1:01 PM 3:19 PM
12:58 PM 3:20 PM 8:09 AM 11:18 AM 8:15 AM 11:22 AM 8:18 AM 11:24 AM 8:29 AM 11:21 AM 8:31 AM 11:35 AW
TOta^M3 Air Vo
.334 .334
.222 .'3TT
.273
.281 .348 .352 .361 .343 .339
(BZ SAMPLES) iQcatio
Block Press Mach. B-10,B-11 Block Press Machine B-4 Block Press (deburring) Block Finish (Hammond Radius grinder #1) Block Finish (Mill Groover machine)
Block Inspection & Packaging Compoundingfirst floor Compoundingsecond floor Compoundingsecond floor Compounding second floor Compoundingsecond floor
.002 Trace Trace
Trace
Trace Trace Trace Trace Trace .0045
Press Operator - E. Shanholtz Press Operator - Walter Gray
Operator - w. Haines Operator - F. w. Macomber Operator - w. L. Smith
Inspector - Arnold Nesmith Dry Line Operator - Porter Powder Pumper - Gene Kline Powder Pumper - Byron Billmyre Powder Weigher - Earl Largent Powder Man - L. Marpole
(*) Concentration in excess of TLV.
FOR D OP COLLECTION*
2 filter with C-110 pump at 2 LPM
3 OP ANALYSIS Absorption
w air LEAD IN AIR
DATS ANALYZED 10/19/72 ANALYST M.,Desoukey TLVi .15 mg/M3 (intended)
'le
_ Date
Total (M3 (BZ SAMPLES) mg/M-
24 10/3/72 8*39 AM .323 CompoiuantJd_i_n_g__- Trace _Wet Line Operatoarrks- c. Bean
.'7 10/5/72 8111:833AAMM .404 Csoemcpoonudndfilnogor-
12:30 PM
first floor
Trace Meter Operator - Prank McDaniel
58
10/5/72 8 21 AM .387 Compounding-
Trace Operator - p. Bly
12:26 PM
Rubber Mill #3
59
10/5/72 8:27 AM .472 Compounding
Trace "Operator - John dowser
12:28 PM
Rubber Mill #2
60
10/5/72 830 AM .399 Compounding-
Trace Operator - M. Eatep
12:27 PM
66
10/5/72 11:45 AM .323
Trace Operator - j. Cheshire
2:28 PM
61
10/5/72 8:51 AM .203
10:36 AM
Trace Operator - w. L. Clark
62
10/5/72 854 AM .202
Trace Operator - Robert Nave
10:37 AM
63
10/5/72 858 AM .195 ' ]
10:39 AM
1
73
10/5/72 4*05 PM .166 I
5*29 PM
1
Trace Operator - R. p. Putnam
Trace 15
Operator - Ricky Ratliffe
74 2705 10/5/72 4:07 PM 5:30 PM
.163 I i
Trace Operator - w. Carlyle 16
Concentration in excess of TLV
SPNY
)
-4
ANALYSES OP AIR BAMPfififl
POR METHOD OP COLLECTION*
I Membrane filter with C-110 pump at 2 LPM
LEAD IN ATP______
METHOD OP ANALYSIS*
Atomic Absorption
,
DATE ANALYZED* 10/19/72 ANALYST* M. Desoukey TLV* .15 mg/M^ (Intended)
garcpl'aJiSj_____ Field Lab.
Date
75 2706 10/5/72
16 2707 10/5/72
11 2708 lO/S/72
78 2709 10/5/72
79 2710 10/5/72
80 2711 10/5/72
47 2712 10/4/72
49 2713 10/4/72 86 2714 10/6/72
- Time 4:14 PM 5:32 PM
4*17 PM 5:33 PM
4:11 PM 5:31 PM
4:22 PM 5:34 PM
4:20 PM 5:35 PM
4:25 PM 5:36 PM
12:35 PM 2:51 PM
12:42 PM 2:52 PM
Total(m 3 -Aie Vol.
(BZ SAMPLES) Location
.154 Book Preform t Mach.Nos. 1, 5
(Second shift)
.149 Book Preform
Mach. Nos. 2, 6
.161
(Second shift) Book Preform
Mach. Nos. 9/ 13
(second shift)
.145 Book Preform
Mach. Nos. 3, 7
.151
(second shift) Book Preform
Mach. Nos. 4.8
.143
(second shift) Book Preform .
Mach.Nos.17,19
.276
(second shift) Disc Brake Mfg.
(Automatic Pre
form 'Mach .#5)
.264 Disc Brake Mfg.
(Disc Brake Pres
mg/MJ Cone. Trace
Trace .0076 .011
Trace Trace Trace
Trace
12:09 PM .129 uis.m
$eruUn!iwelper j Trace
(*) concentration in excess of TLV.
--
Remarks
Operator - Lee Oates
Operator - Pat Volpe
Operator - Mildred Hickey - --
Operator - R. Gillespie
Operator - Paul Meadows
Operator - Daniel McKenzie
Operator - R. L. Dove
Operator - David Brown -"pin. 1
I