Document wqDNmdKr20pbjEODggkjmL3XE

KAISER GYPSUM COMPANY, INC. INTER-OFFICE MEMORANDUM to g, B. Kirk at Oakland date March 1, 1974 (' copies to j. w. Blewett (via GBK) T. Y. Smith H. L. Weightman A. F. rtafiaelli SUBJECT DUST FROM JOINT COMPOUND JOB OPERATIONS From J. ^neahan at Antioch R & D PL 4.1.0 00022 We have received a group of three reports from the Gypsum Association covering amounts of asbestos and siliceous dusts generated during mixing and sanding of joint compounds on typical jobs. The overall summary by the testing agency states, "There was evidence of exposure of workers to airborne concentrations of asbestos and both total and respirable siliceous dust in excess of acceptable limits as estab lished by OSHA. Because of the high concentrations of total dust gener ated during the mixing and sanding activities, it is clear that control of the total dust problem would provide an inherent control rf the asso ciated asbestos and silica problems as well." The first report deals with dry and premix products fro:., the other five major gypsum companies, with KGC materials not included. The dust sam ples collected were so heavy that reliable tests for asbestos could not be made, and only siliceous dust values are reported. The second report covers a recheck using dry and premix products from two of the above companies on siliceous dust values. The third report covers asbestos dust from the products used for the second report. A summary of the test data is attached. Also attached is a summary of our own tests on our own products. ACTION REQUIRED: 1) Review and recommendation as to whether asbestos warning labels may legitimately be removed from our premix products. The 'raw states that "no label is required where asbestos fibers have been modified by a bonding agent, coating, binder or other material so that during any reasonably foreseeable use, no airborne concentre?io..s of asbes tos fibers in excess of the prescribed exposure limits will be released." Our company is the only major company carrying the asbes tos warning on its premix and it is costing us business. 2) Recommendation as to company's position on what is next step to be taken by the Gypsum Association Study Committee on this project. That committee is already on record in favor of placing the asbestos warning and a dust warning on all bags and pails of joint con.pound . JSS/sc Attachment 63 KG-0063 SUMMARY OF GYPSUM ASSOCIATION REPORTS FIRST REPORT .t . .' .` . . . September 1973 tests - Siliceous Dusts (asbestos dust data not reliable) . Mixing., of 5 dry powder joint compounds ' . Worker exposure (breathing zone): . 8. hr TWA OSHA Limit ** Total dust - 8.9 to 21.6 mg/cu m * . Respirable dust - 1.3 to 9.1 mg/cu m * - General area exposure: ' Total dust - 10.8 to 34.0 mg/cu m ` 3.1 to 9.7 Respirable dust - 0.8 to 2.6 mg/cu m ' *. Sanding of joints from 3 dry powders and 5 premixes Worker exposure (breathing zone): ' Total dust - 72.5 to 244.4 mg/cu m 2.4 to 15.0 . Respirable dust - 1.5 to 5.6 mg/cu m * ~ General area exposure: ' Total dust - 27.7 to 136.7 mg/cu m 4-0 to 15.0 Respirable dust - 4-4 to 23.0 mg/cu m 0.7 to 5.0 * not calculable because samples too small to analyze for free silica content needed for the calculation. Respirable dusts are specific size fractions of the total dust. #* The OSHA limit amounts vary because they are dependent on the amount of silica present. NOTES: . 1) There was no significant difference among dust levels generated by sending joints which used dry powder compounds versus those which used premix com pounds. ' 2) No one manufacturer's product was significantly closer to complying with OSHA limits than were the others. * 3) It is said that the individual worker is unlikely to have more than 2 hrs. direct exposure to mixing or sending each 'workday. ' SUMMARY OF GYPSUM ASSOCIATION REPORTS vaijirfaR'iiiiri-t''ii>'ii4Wa.iia'ir vii > liP -SBCOKP REPORT . . . . . November 1973 testa - Siliceous Dus.ts ;. Mixing of two dry powder joint compounds Worker'exposure (breathing zone): 8 hr TWA OSHA Limit ** ' Total dust - 11.7 and 33.8 mg/cu m Respirable dust - <8.5 and 6.9 mg/cu m General area exposure: . Total dust - 121.6 and 98.3 mg/cu m 6.7 and 5.4 Respirable dust - 13.8 and 12.2 mg/cu m 1.3 and * Sanding of joints from 2 dry powders Worker exposure (breathing zone): ' Total dust - 109.5 and 196:3 mg/cu m 8.8 and 5.0 Respirable dust - 3.3 and 2.0 mg/cu m ' General area exposure: . Total dust - 96.4 and 76.5 mg/cu m 8.3 and 4.0 Respirable dust - 14.6 and 7.6 m'g/eu m 3.3 and 1.9 Sanding of joints from 2 premixes Worker exposure (breathing zone): Total dust - 69.2 and 87.3 mg/cu m 9.4 and 10.0 Respirable dust - 3.9 and 6.4 mg/cu m General area exposure: ' Total dust - 54.9 and 91.3 mg/cu m 5.6 and 1.5 Respirable dust - 4.9 and 7.9 * and 3.1 * Not calculable because samples too small to analyze for free silica content needed for the calculation. ** The OSHA limit amounts vary because they are dependent on the amount of silica present. NOTE: 1) It is said that the individual worker is unlikely to have more than 2 hrs. direct exposure to mixing or sanding each workday. SUMMARY OF GYPSUM ASSOCIATION REPORTS XMfiP R5PQRX ' . ' ' November 1973 tests - Asbestos Dust (fibers longer than 5 micrometers) OSHA Standard - continuous exposure . 1 OSHA Standard - peak exposure 5 fibers/cc . 10 fibers/cc Worker exposure (breathing zone): Mixing: 1st dry compound 2nd dry compound Sanding: 10 min, samples avg 1st dry compound 2nd dry compound 4.4 fibers/cc 1st premix 2nd premix . 4.2 10.8 , 31.4 fibers/cc 7.6 fibers/cc 30 min, samples / allquoted & redeposited 39.4 fibers/cc 14.8 11.1 9.7 6 of 13 sanding tests (10 min. samples) indicated concentrations in excess of 5 fibers. ** 2 of 13 sanding tests (10 min. samples) indicated concentrations in excess of 10 fibers. . NOTE: . l) It is said that the individual worker is unlikely to have more than 2 hrs. direct exposure to mixing or sanding each workday. ' i i V RESULT? OF TEST WITH KGC COMPOUNDS BY UNION C.JtSIDE Asbestos Lust (fibers longer than 3 micrometers) Worker exposure (breathing zone): Mixing joint compound with drill mixoc Mixing finishing compound with potato masher Sanding joint donewith Premix Topping Sanding joint donewith Premil IXitl Purpose Sanding Joint donewith Finishing Compound fibers/cc 54.6 66.5 4.3 1.1 2.8 NOT e: Since in no case the sampling time was longer than 2 minutes, these dataashould be used only as general guides to indicate gross relative differences. 2 or "grey asbestos" (an iron magnesium silicate), crocidolite, or "blue asbestos" (a sodium iron silicate), tremolite (a calcium mag nesium silicate), and anthophyllite (another iron magnesium sili cate). Of these, chrysotile accounts for over 90 percent of the total usage of asbestos in this country, with amosite and crocido lite being the only other types used to any significant extent. Asbestos exists naturally in bundles of extremely fine fibers which can be subdivided easily into many smaller fibers. The potential health hazard associated with exposure to asbestos is that of inhala tion of airborne fibers resulting in'a type of pneumoconiosis referred to as "asbestos is." Small asbestos fibers can pass readily through the upper respiratory tract and be deposited in the terminal bronchi oles of the lung. There, they produce a local irritation which the body attempts to overcome by initiating a tissue response resulting in the encapsulation of the fibers and consequent formation of "as bestos bodies." If sufficient quantities of fibers are inhaled over an extended period of time, a generalized diffuse peribronchiolar fibrosis can develop. This pulmonary fibrosis can impair the trans fer of oxygen across the aveolar membranes and result in respiratory insufficiencies, or even cardiac failure. It has been determined, through toxicological and epidemiological studies, that long fibers, 20 to 50 micrometers in length, are most active in the production of the fibrosis. Fibers shorter than about two micrometers in length, are practically without an irritating effect. There is some evidence that other minerals having fibrous characteristics can produce simi lar react ions. Many recent studies have indicated an association between exposure to asbestos in both industrial and urban atmospheres and an increase in a relatively rare type of lung cancer known as mesothelioma. Al though it has not been possible to establish a connection with asbes tos in all cases of this disease, there is a strong correlation be tween exposure to crocidolite and occurrence of mesotheliomas. Other types of asbestos have been implicated to a much lesser extent. How ever, this "new hazard" has received much public attention because it has been suggested that very minimal, non-occupational exposure can be sufficient to produce the disease in some individuals. For many years the American Conference of Governmental Industrial Hy gienists has recommended a threshold limit value (TLV) of five mil lion particles per cubic foot of air (mppcf) for all types of asbes tos-bearing dusts containing less than one percent crystalline silica. The threshold limit value is defined as the concentration of an air borne contaminant to which it is believed that nearly all workers can be exposed for continuous and repeated work days without experiencing adverse effects. The TLV of five mppcf was based on the impinger sam pling technique which was selected as the standard method in the early epidemiological studies of occupational exposure to asbestos. With this method, air is drawn through an impinger containing water and the total particles (both grains and fibers) in an aliquot of the sample,are counted using light-field microscopic techniques. Within recent years, because of the increasing concern about asbestos in the environment and the resulting need for a more relevant sam pling method, the American Conference of Governmental Industrial 3 Hygienists has proposed a TLV of five fibers (greater than five micro maters in length) per cubic centimeter of air. This standard is base* on the membrane filter technique with actual microscopic fiber count ing at 400-450X magnification using phase contrast illumination. The Occupational Safety and Health Administration (OSHA) has estab lished the above concentration (five fibers, greater than five micro meters in length, per cubic centimeter of air) as an emergency stand ard and have announced that, effective July 1, 1976, the acceptable limit for an eight-hour, time-weighted average exposure will be re duced to two fibers/cc. In addition, OSHA has established the con centration of ten fibers (greater than five micrometers in length) per cubic centimeter of air as an acceptable ceiling concentration. Workers shall not be exposed to concentrations of asbestos in excess of this value, regardless of duration of exposure. SAMPLING AND ANALYTICAL METHODS The air sampling conducted to evaluate exposures of workers to asbes tos was all of the "breathing zone" type. These samples were col lected by drawing air through 37-mm diameter membrane filters (Millipore Type AA) at a rate of about two liters per minute using small, battery-operated pumps (Mine Safety Appliances Company, Model G). The sampling units were worn by the workers engaged in either mixing or sanding the joint compound; the pump was attached to the belt and the sampler head fastened on the outside of the worker's shirt at approximate breathing zone height. Thus, these samples were repre sentative of the time-weighted average conditions to which the men were exposed during the sampling period. The sampling head consisted of a three piece cassette (Millipore); during sampling the face cap was removed and the filter was used in an "open face" mode with the filter positioned slightly downward so as to minimize dust falling d.irectly onto the filter. Sampling was conducted for the entire duration of the mixing opera tions but because of the higher anticipated concentrations associ ated with sanding of the joint compounds it was decided to change filters approximately every ten minutes. Sampling during the sand ing on the various joint compounds was conducted over a total period of sixty minutes. Therefore six consecutive ten-minute samples were obtained for each sanding test. In additibn to the ten-minute tests, samples were collected over thirty-minute periods as well, i.e., two consecutive 30-minute samples for each sanding test. After collec tion of each sample the filter cap was replaced and the cassette, or sampler head, was sealed immediately and prepared for transfer to the analytical laboratory. The method of counting asbestos fibers was essentially the same as that used by the U.S, Public Health Service for the enumeration of asbestos dust on membrane filters. The description of this method first appeared in an article written by G.H. Edwards and J.R. Lynch and appeared in the Annals of Occupational Hygiene, Volume 2, pages 1-6 (1968) . 4 In summary, the method consisted of the following steps. A pie-shaped section of each sample was mounted on a standard microscope slide using a high viscosity solution of membrane filter in a 1:1 mixture of diethyl oxalate and dimethyl phthalate to render the filter transparent. The asbestos fibers which were on the surface of the filter were then counted using a 10X eyepiece and a 40X objective with phase contrast illumina tion. A number of fields, selected at random across the sample, suf ficient to reveal a minimum of 100 fibers were examined and fibers greater than five micrometers in length were counted. Any particle having an aspect ratio of three or greater was con sidered to be a fiber. Although it was conceivable that there would be fibers of paper or other materials present on the fil ters which would have been dislodged from the wallboard during the sanding operation it did not appear that these were of any adverse consequence during the analysis of the samples. Although it is realized that the counting technique is not specific in terms of being able to identify the chemical nature of the fibers present in the sample, all of the fibers observed in these sam ples appeared to have physical features characteristic of asbes tos fibers. For those samples collected over a thirty-minute period, and which were too heavily loaded to evaluate directly under the microscope, the collected material on the filters was dislodged in a highly purified distilled water bath using an ultrasonic unit (Dynasonic Corporation, Model G6 generator and Model T6 tank) and diluted to one liter. An aliquot of the resulting suspension was drawn, passed through a membrane filter (Millipofe Type HA) and was then analyzed according to the procedure described above. PRESENTATION OF RESULTS A total of four joint compound products were used during this study. These products (two dry mix and two "ready mix") were supplied by two manufacturers whose identities were not known to the investiga tor. The products were identified by code *(2D, 2R, 4D and 4R), a number referring to the supplier and the letter indicating whether the product was a "dry" or "ready-mix" compound. The results of the sampling program conducted during the mixing of the two dry mix products and sanding tests on all four joint com pounds are presented in Tables I through IV. Examination of these data reveals the following: 1. During mixing of Joint Compound 2D, the worker was exposed to a concentration of 31.4 fibers, greater than five micro meters in length, per cubic centimeter of air. 2. The amount of total particulate generated during the sand ing operation on Joint Compound 2D was so great that direct 5 analysis of the ten-minute samples was not possible. Anal ysis of the thirty-minute samples, which were redeposited, indicated an average concentration of 39.4 fibers, greater than five micrometers in length,per cubic centimeter of air. 3. The results of analyzing four of the six ten-minute samples collected during sanding on Joint Compound 2R indicated an average concentration of 4.2 fibers per cubic centimeter; two of the samples were too heavily loaded to analyze di rectly. Results of analysis of the two thirty-minute sam ples collected during the sanding on Joint Compound 2R indi cated an average concentration of 11.1 fibers per cubic cen timeter, a factor of over 2.5 times as high as the average obtained from analysis of the ten-minute samples. 4. The sample obtained during the mixing of Joint Compound 4D indicated a concentration of 7.6 fibers, greater than five micrometers in length, per cubic centimeter of air. 5. Results of analyzing four of the six ten-minute samples col lected during the sanding on Joint Compound 4D indicated an average concentration of 4.4 fibers per cubic centimeter. Analysis of the two thirty-minute samples, which were sub jected to the redepositing procedure, indicated an average concentration of 14.8 fibers per cubic centimeter, a factor of 3.4 times as high as results obtained fron the ten-minute samples. 6. The results of analysis of five of the six samples obtained during the sanding on Joint Compound 4R indicated an aver age concentration of 10.8 fibers per cubic centimeter. Re sults of analysis of the two thirty-minute samples indicated an average concentration of 9.7 fibers per cubic centimeter, a value essentially the same as that obtained from analysis of the ten-minute samples. 7. Six of the thirteen ten-minute samples obtained during sand ing on the four joint compounds indicated concentrations in excess of five fibers per cubic centimeter. Both mixing operations generated asbestos concentrations in excess of five fibers per cubic centimeter. 8. Two of the thirteen ten-minute samples collected during the sanding tests indicated concentrations in excess of ten fibers per cubic centimeter, the acceptable ceiling concen tration. One of the two mixing operations generated an as bestos -in-air concentration in excess of ten fibers per cubic centimeter. 9. Of the four products tested, sanding on 2R and 4d resulted in concentrations less than, but approaching, the current acceptable limit for continuous exposure of workers, five fibers per cubic centimeter. Product 4R consistently pro duced very high concentrations of total dust which obscured the asbestos fibers on the samples. 6 CONCLUSIONS The following conclusions ar e presented on the basis of observations and measurements made during the study reported herein. 1. Based on the results of the ten-minute samples, it is apparent that the exposur es of workers engaged in mixing and sanding of the various j oint compounds used during this test would be to concentrations approaching or exceeding five fibers, greater than five mi crometers in length, per cubic centimeter of air. 2. It is clear that persons engaged in the mixing and sanding of joint compounds similar to those used during this test would be exposed to concentrations of airborne asbestos In excess of two fibers per cubic centimeter during the entire course of their work. This value is the proposed acceptable limit for an eight-hour time-weighted average exposure to asbestos which is scheduled to become effective July 1, 1976. 3 With the exception of the tests conducted during sanding on joint compound 4R the results of analysis of the thirty-min ute samples, using the redeposition technique, were consist ently higher than those obtained by direct analysis of the ten-minute samples by a factor of 2-1/2 to 3-1/2. Therefore 3 it appears that use of the redeposition technique would re sult in the apparent concentrations of asbestos in air being higher than actually present and would therefore err on the "conservative" side. 4. Discounting the results obtained by analysis of the thirtyminute samples, for which the redeposition technique was used, three of the samples collected (mixing of 2D and sand ing on 4R) indicated concentrations in excess of ten fibers per cubic centimeter and are therefore a concern as peak exposures. With those exceptions, the problem is one of con trolling the time-weighted average exposures of workers to asbestos. In that respect, it must be pointed out that the sampling results reported herein are indicative of the expo sures of workers during the mixing or sanding operations and not their time-weighted average exposure for a full workday. RECOMMENDATIONS 1. The results of sampling reported herein should be analyzed in conjunction with a study of the work practices and routine of persons engaged in mixing, sanding or otherwise being exposed to Joint compounds similar to those used in this study. In this way a true evaluation of the time-weighted average exposure of such workers to asbestos can be made. If it is true that, as reported by workers used during this test, it would be unlikely for an individual to mix or sand on the joint compounds for greater than two hours per workday, then the time-weighted aver age exposure of such workers to asbestos likely would be within acceptable limits. Of course, the problem of controlling any 7 exposures to below ten fibers per cubic centimeter would still have to be contended with. - 2. From the standpoint of being able to eliminate or minimize the problem of excessive concentrations of asbestos being generated by handling and use of the joint compounds, consideration should be given to the following aspects. a. The most effective means of eliminating the asbestos problem obviously would be to eliminate asbestos from the joint compound formulations if this is feasible. Although the spe cific role that asbestos plays in the joint compound formu lations is not clear it is understood that manufacturers of joint compounds consider it necessary that asbestos be in the formulations. b. From an engineering standpoint, it may be necessary to imple ment the following measures in conjunction with mixing and sanding of the joint compounds containing asbestos. i. . Mixing of the joint compounds could be done in such a way that the material is more effectively wetted as it is removed from the containers or could be done within an enclosure, with or without mechanical ventilation, so as to minimize the amount of asbestos fibers released into the breathing zone of the workers. ii. Although the results of the air sampling reported herein indicate concentrations of asbestos fibers in excess of acceptable limits, either those currently enforced or those proposed to be made effective in July, 1976, it was obvious during the study that the sanding process in general has associated with it exposure of the worker to tremendously high concentrations of total dust. There fore, if means were implemented to maintain the exposure of the workers to total particulate to within acceptable limits there would be an inherent control of the asbestos problem as well. Although more extensive in nature, en gineering control of the total dust generated by the sand ing operations is feasible. Such control techniques would include, but not be limited to, the use of a wet sanding technique and/or use of a portable local exhaust ventila tion system incorporating, as the air moving device, a unit similar to common industrial vacuum cleaners and bag collectors. 3. The next phase of the testing program to control workers' expo sures to asbestos during use of the joint cement compounds logi cally would be evaluations of the various potential engineering control concepts indicated or inferred above. This report prepared by: Robert D. Soule, P.E. Vice-President, Industrial Hygiene Services CO o u Q ,Q0) OS < X Btf s H -H h V * (3 as o ss 3g -3 as0 .n e4 mn 2M o Mg S SB a a 4J e 0 H 4-1 m 4uJ a o B oo CO 14 <11 .io4 tn 0V HB aa B 0o CO > o O 5d_ m A CD nV .-t Vu H J3 a 0 E H 0 at CO S 00 14 o H *r4 o. &0 0p CO o 4J u 0 CO p CM 0 j3 a o jL| 0 J H . 44 aH M H Z U 0 Op o oB < 0 0. K a ao m ss o iJf 0 0 *0 *4 H u 9 p M ** St CM vO 1-4 in * * * ro * CO CO CO O r4 VO o VO t St CO CM o f^. o-4 r^. CM r* in r^. oo O'* o HCM iC-M4 C1-M4 Cr-M4 Cr--M4 CM r4 oo r^ r* r* r- r* cm in in o r-4 CM CM ON r--1 r-4 1-4 CM CM CM CM /-N >~\ /-N /n --N '\ 'rwO' SU-/ '-OZ vO-/ *o TD xj VO XJ o T3 so-/ *0 a 0 a aO a 0 o c aO d a o d a o d a o o cl CL CL a CL CL aE eO 0 o eO O B0 o e O o Bo o Eo u a P cc oo d 0 a o d o d o o 00 bO c bO d 00 a to a 60 d b0 a e H H H irl H t4 H T3 T3 t3 XJ rO XH s a C0/3 a C0O a C0O d 0 CO d C0O a C0O H CM CO <) in VO 1 11i SB CO CO CO CO CO CO Ppp ppp p CM CM CM CM CM CM CM ON ON On ON ON ON ON 1-4 *v. <s V -Ss., i-l H r4 i-4 H i-4 t4 H r4 H ** 1 r- rs m C1-M4 tC-M4 rv. rs. CO CM CM y-\ /*n NO-/ O xdj TD d aa OO CL a EE o0 ou ad o0 bO 60 dd H H T3 XI ad C0O 0 CO rs oo1 CO CO pp CM CM ON On -Ss i-4 r-4 H *H E i-4 0 i-4 0 M H - 0 s 60 > in CD u 60 0B Ad tH 14 v: o >a H 0 X ^4 44 r-4 d t4 in n >-4 H i-4 O 4J x4 0 i-4 0 4 rs M i X"S 0 44 > Oo 0 D P 4Jn cr* d H p 0o dE o N X3 i-4 0 f4 X3 0 i4 P0 e dd 0J 0 P 0 i4 60 o d )4 *r4 0 J3 W U 0 0M HE -o 6 -LI V 0 *H > *T3 4 d 44 o0 Vi o i-4 s0 oM >% *H ?s 0X JC 4-1 0 P M r5 4J CM 0 0 CM 0 - d O0 a0 *4 X3 T3 U P ^3 r-l mOa XJ 0 >> p 00 d *4 ? 0 44 CpM to P 4J P0 CM > P ^4 Ps P o X3 00 d r- o d 1 D I i-4 0 u 0 > dp o CL 4J B ^1 0P CL E u N O *H P o a o d r-4 0 0 i-4 o 44 p at 44 0 p 0 d p CL O CO CD >% s 3 60 d u 0 a .60 O d jc H a c h X3 o x: d XJ p ^4 r4 < X a Sc o H 0c CO O> o VO Hm *N 0 /-N P N4 u s-x * ** too h e a v ily m a te ria l on re d e p o s ite d lf io latdee rd fo r an fo r was a ly s d ir ta k is e e c n t i ana n to ly s s u is sp e n s io n and an a liq u o t < . GEORGE D . CLAYTON & ASSOCIATES IN D U S TR IA L HYGIENE SAMPLING SUMMARY C lie n t Gypaum A a a o c la tio n M a te ria lAsbestos (3 *O4 4J 4 h *J d o o c o CD a oh o ^ --3T * cn in CM H . k O*V 00 4H3 8rt CM -tf- OV * cn * fa in A V H a 83 8 -4 4O CO > CD h a> 4J O oOOoooo VO CM CM CM vO CM CM CM 0) 4J H 43 aM 8 H <0 0) CO 3 00 C TJ i4 O H 8 CO Ih CO CL O 4J CO h to u CO 00 0in0 00 o 00 oo 00 CM 0cn0 N00t VO m vO vO vO VO vO VO rH H r-1 H t--l co 00 st 00 in 00 O H00 00 1--1 0CM0 0m0 m m m vO vO vO vO VO i--i r--f rH H rH C<9M0 CO 3 .D o o H 2S H O o /-N /> r-s 4--S <n a o 43 43 rO v-/. JO 43 rO JO V/ ft . T3 -o TO TO T3 *o TO 'O 4-1 d d c d d d d d a H L 3 0 CL 3o CL 3 o CL 3o CL 3o CL 3o o. d o CL do a o to V Bo EO' Bo B o oB os B o B o ooVy0yaa o 00 60 60 60 60 60 60 60 cH d H d H Hd c *rrl ddd H H nj TO TJ TJ TO *o cd d d d d ad (0 cd CO * CO cd CO CcOd CcOd CcOd CcOd cd CO 4 H a ao as 00 rH CM cn <* in vO 00 CO CO CO CO CO CO CO CO erf CM erf CM erf CM erf CM erf CM irf CM erf CM CeMrf CO ` *4 ' Ov i--1 's*. o\ rH OV H N. OS CT> OV rH H H v \ NSs. av --i OV r-1 L4 p H H H H H H --l rH 1-1 t-i f--1 H rH ^"1 to ul I-I vt V h O -M . tC4 ' W 4J (0 4J 43 CM -H ,r*>. T3 iM 44 !=> B O3 0) cH 43 C * CD O ra > N CS *rH O 4J rl Q| 5 Sc > 4J h r-J a) 43 M 4J . d * hO O VO vO > O ^ 5s d-s H (0 "O d H *# B) S (H CM >. (0 fa p-l m cn J0O Te3 Or-' ' 3 15 ho. 3 01 1 O -H to P ,,h V <h ^ ih o a) . a 09 B Ms a G i-i jo:, CO ii--4i <C a c tdo oS in H 0) a) of i * ** too h e a v ily m a te ria l on lf io latdee rd fo r was d ire c t a n a ly s is ta ke n in to su sp e n sio n and an a liq u o t re d e p o s ite d fo r a n a ly s is M a te ria lA s b e s to s a liq u o t an and n io IN D U S TR IA L HYGIENE SAMPLING SUMMARY GEORGE D. CLAYTON & ASSOCIATES TABLE I I I . co 4J m M u e u u c o CO uM <u JO fe O o ***** B 3. m A V E 9* 9 6 _< CO 5> (0 IH 0) u *H p * * vO m cm - * * rs m in H * * rH rH. - * en -st* rH o oo O o oo o o oo CM o o o o o --i vO r--1 CM CM CM VO CM CM 4- rH JS aM e H aV CO bO C "a tI o rH H D. M e 0) 9b CO Ou o JJ w h qj iJ CO . O as O o O o O O i-1 m CN <1* m C CM rH CM bv o o o o rH rH rH rH o H rH rH rH rH rH rH rH a o o as o o o o o o CM CM CM m m o rH a o o o o o o rH rH o ' rH rH rH rH rH rH rH rH T> s n e is sp s u ly s ana in to t c n e e d ir ta k is fo r was a ly s lf io latdee rd fo r an G ypsum A s s o c ia t io n _____________ aN as t3 5 e 3 i 14 S <3 1 ii -H s iH (D Q ") /-N /^S /-s /*N . /-N /~\ /--s /-"S a so/ a VU 'wo' NCwJ' U >a 'a 'O T3 T3 rO 'O H3 'U s d 3 3 d d 3 3 d3d3dd33d 3o oooooooo CL CL CL Cl CL CL CL CL CL B B B B B s B B s0oooo0oo o u 0 o o a .o o a a 00 bO bO 60 u> 60 60 bO 00 d d d d 3 d b 3 c iH H H rH iH H rl H *o TJ b TJ T3 a X 3 3 3 3 d 3 3 d *rH d cd id d cd cd cd X CO CO CO CO CO CO CO CO ffl eu So <s as CO cn r- ** 9 rH Q r-H CM cn < m vo 11iiii 00 ii X 1 CO 1 CO 1 CO 1 CO 1 CO1 CO 1 COI CO 1 ppppppppp -si* <1* -3* <1* <1* a> o> ov o\ Ok a as as Ov r--* rH tH rH rH rH rH rH rH ***. V -*** V *>-- --N* rH H H *--1 rH rH rH rH rH rH i--4 rH r-l --1 rH rH rH rH co > as too h e a v ily m a te ria l on re d e p o s ite d * ** C lie n t V A sbestos * * m a te ria l on f i l t e r was ta ke n in to suspension and an a liq u o t re d e p o s ite d fo r a n a ly s is : M a te ria l IN D U S T R IA L HYGIENE SAM PLING SUMMARX GEORGE D . CLAYTON & ASS O C IATES TABLE IV . c o t4 4J CO H u c 0) u c o 00 O ou o d) ^ 43 e *rl 3. in A V QJ E ext 9 E 10 o C/3 > 00 M 41 4J H J ** ** co CO in OV rH CO r--1 vO rH OS 00 m rH o 1 m rH o oooo o o Oooo o VO CM CM CM vO CM O 1 vO CM ' a> u i-i a) c-l J* 1-t mX u * o Zu V 44 rH 43 a 60 e -h cO 0) co 3: 60 c v4 0 H rH an e QJ aa Vi CL O 44 CO 44 H <0 4J CO rH rH rH rH rH rH n rH o in o CO rH H CO O,, in m m m > m H rH rH rH rH rH 'rH rH rH 00 co CO sf in O o rH rH -if m m m m rH ' rH rH rH rH rH rH H pa Ctf W 3 se o 3 *r4 . a 44 S CL <3 CJ g i -i a !H 0) 3O "3 o s*/ TJ d d 0 cl B o o /-s XX S_4 TJ d d o CL oo XX v_^ TJ d o o. E o u /"N HO v TJ d d o Cl e o a rH 43 d d 0 a e o o /--\ ' 43 N-4 TD d o CL E o o 4^V XX > TJ d o a B .0 o /H XX w TJ d d o CL E o o 60 60 to 60 60 60 60 60 d C c d iH *H *H rH rH rH rH fH TJ T3 TJ T> TJ "O TJ TJ d d d d ' d cd P3 cd cd cd cd cd CO CO CO CO CO CO CO CO 0> CL 6o a ss CO rH CM CO m vO 00 CO CO CO CO CO CO CO CO 1 t1i 1 J 1i ctf oa ctf ctf Ctf Ctf ctf pa <t -3- 'd- <fr if <f <t Os OS as OS os On On On ro 0) rH rH rH i--t rH rH rH rH r- 44 \ \ -N*. \ Sv L1 OS H eg Q rH rH rH rH rH rH rH rH . rH f-H rH rH rH rH rH rH 9U W a> .c C h 00 . H 3 >1 <u 4J 4-1 d H U tM3 0-1-1 a to e aa D OJ3 > 43 H Si u 43 0) > i4 JJ <a i--i a) i-i 43 M 8-S 4J 00 0) \o B0 -w H 43 43 r-i a a> c U3 >v43 a ' a *j <u & 43 O TJ G 00 r-- a o 1 00 M Oo. 3 to > e 4J 1 o u 1-1 d 43 <-> e0o) 3 3 43 o 0) a B> >v S 60 a i-i -e O T3 to -H 43 TD d a c > <3 co o H <r sf eo xi . C lie n t Gypsum A s s o c ia tio n