Document wKK33LJ6QEx5eBYnLzj1XX1aV

1 client was asked about products, he said, well, I Page 694 2 sanded Borg-Warner brakes; and Ford's position then is 3 well, Ford never required sanding, so his ID must be 4 mistaken. 5 Mr. Williams and I talked last night, that 6 Mr. Grewe's ID must be mistaken, but none of these 7 companies required sanding and apparently that was 8 their position, and none of them required sanding and 9 grinding on the brakes. 10 He describes it in connection with Ford and 11 he described it in connection with Borg-Warner and the 12 others, so I just don't see the purpose, and I think 13 it is just an attempt to get in other product 14 exposures. 15 THE COURT: That objection will be 16 overruled. 17 It appears to the Court that that is proper 18 cross-examination, and I will permit those areas to be 19 included and shown to the trier of fact. 20 MR. SMITH: Thank you, Your Honor. 21 MR. WILLIAMS: Thank you.