Document vVM4pb9DMpj6Yz936On5MpJm

FILE NAME Packings and Gaskets PAG DATE 2000 DOC PAG043 DOCUMENT DESCRIPTION Unpublished Report - Investigation of Asbestos Exposure During Valve Replacement & HR * nce 1978 NVIR NMENTA_ * NCC PORATED SL = REGIO KWELL STREET DOVER NJ 07601 L + OFFICES ATLANTA CHICAGO (973)366-1660 FAX 9731366-3116 344 2414 mail INFO@ATLENV.COM Wedsite ATLENV.COM aer a se ce - asec ! he j MARS INVESTIGATION INVESTIGATION INVESTIGATION OF ASBESTOS EXPOSURE DURING DURING VALVE VALVE PACKING FEPLACEMENT FEPLACEMENT FERFORMED FERFORMED BY AT _ANTIC ENVIRONMENTAL ENVIRONMENTAL INC 2 E. BLACKWELL ST DOVER NJ IN ESTIGATION PERFORMED AT T. E . RBOINE RBOINE MATI RIALS EXPOSURE CHAMBER AMEC 83 BASSETT HIGHWAY DOVER NJ epe ober RR E AROP ENTAL PINUS CONTENT TIPENT 1.0 INTI DUC CONOT F E CONTENTN S CT ONTES NTS TE ERIE| 2.0 TEST PROT COL 1.1 ckgr nd Clearance Clearance Samples 1 rticipats EL 2.3 ive Hory Hory + # eamfir eamfir Operato Operato oun eeececneecenenn sncusscserensecetanssscuecensueunqassneecenpess peeusumneansssocueres2 Sen . ane 2.52.5 . cking Replacemen ( -- RR TPP CAE 3.0 TEST RESU IS wa Opel + 11 ample malysis 4. 2 ir Sar le Results . ... 4.0 CON USI 1978 1978 1978 ENVIRONMENTAL ENVIRONMENTAL ENVIRONMENTAL Inve igation of Acbestos Exposure : uring Packing Replacement August 28.000 28.0 28.000 INT ODU TION A sum AMI NJ asbe sum val ~ Air : August os fibe e packing replacement was perit med at the Atlantic Environmental Inc. me Materials Exposure Chamber Chamber located at 83 Bassett Highway Dover August 2000. The evaluation inve ved monitoring for potential exposure to s during the replacement of pacing pacing in 1 inch steam valve 2.0 TES 2.1 PROTOCOL Background Clearance Samples Backgound clearance samples inside the chamber were obtained using uniform cleara ce criteria developed by Atlantic Environmental Inc. The results of the five se air samples utilizing TEM an lysis indicate levels of less than 0.005 o of asbestos fibers of 5 micron or greater in length ants lowing individuais were direct y involved in this study * Tom Merz Steamfitter a Robert Sheriff Acting is Steamfitter Assistant 8 Dr. Frederick M. Toca Observer and Coordinator of Activities outside the chamber a Ascestos Specialist to prepare chamber coordinate sampling and ee filming activities . EN . Environmental Technician to perform duties outside the chamber as required er et 2.3 Valy History et fe stem stem valve was received via Feder stem 1 Express from Mr. Roben Lee Lee General On Man er ADI Technologies Inc 12 Queens Street Honolulu Hawaii ^ n State nt from Mr Les dated 8/23/00 the the the inch steam vaive came from a tem Honc iu machine shop and was rated for 900 PSI at 775 Farenheit Mr. Les PRO confided of confided that it was from an ocean g ing vessel but could not identify the vessel in This valve was designated as vaive # HON002 The valve packing HERE from .ON002 was removed as part of a study performed on August 23 2000 Lu Ongust Ongust 28 2000 this same vaive was was repacked with John Crane Style No. 815 Pe in . packing 1 On ne Pee cee cre ee AI TEE AUR ATE Cee 100 ETH NT RQ NOP FROM DET bat Mera POZ POZPOZ POZ EN Wines. 2 # 1978 1978 1978 EN IRON ENTAL Inve igation of Asbestos Exposure turing Packing Replacement August 28,000 28,00 28,000 2.4 2.4 Stea fitter Operator Mr. perit peric foam omas C. Merz a journeyman p pipefitter with 25 years experience med the valve packing replacement Dunng his 25 years Mr. Merz has ned valve packing removals and replacements on water hot water steam COHalon and sprinkler systems systems 2.5 Pack g Replacement The packing replacement by Mr. Tom Mezz began at approximately 11:25 am Easter . Daylight Time on August 28 2000. Four pieces of John Crane Vaive Packing Packing Material Style 815 ...inch of the appropriate diameter to correcdy fit the vaive ter opening were measured and cut with a knife Each piece was the length of 1 diameter around the valve shaft The The packing was installed so that the ends were s'aggered around the shaft The entire replacement was completed at approximately approximately 11:38 am During the project project Mr. Merz used his own tools which he broightwith him and used procedures that he normally would utilize in his profes ion 3.0 3.0 Test results All New serial nd air samples were analyzed by Scientific Laboratories Inc. New York ork.cientific ork.cientfic ork.cientific Laboratories is a cert^-d laboratory 3.1 Sami le Analysis 3.1.1 Air samples were analyzed by CM Phase Contrast Microscopy using NIOSH 7400 and TEM Transmission Electron Microscopy using NIOSH 7402 Analyncal Methc is SOE nea _ atm ......... ATL cn ATL VTIC cen MMA jer EN IRON MENTAL AONE 7 in 3 1978 Inve gation of A bestos Exposure turing turing Packing Replacement August 28 2000 T un 3.2 3.2 Same Same Results 3.2.1 Air Sample Results Sor Three area samples inside the test test chamber were analyzed by PCM and all TES samples indicated actual concentrations concentrations of less than 0.023 fibers 5 microns or longer One area sample inside the chamber chamber was analyzed by TEM and indicated no asbestos fibers detected at the lower detecnon limit of 0.0093f cc Two personnel samplers using battery powered sampling devices on the steamfitter both indicated exposure exposure levels of less than the detection limit of 0.096f during the sampling period This translates to an hour time weighted average of less than 0.0026f Two personnel samples using battery powered personnel samplers attached to the assistant indicated exposure levels of less than the detection limit of0.093 Ebersic and 0.090 fibers respectively during the sampling period This translates to 8 hour time weighted average levels of less than 0.0025fcc al d 0.0024f respectively The two personnel samples 1 on the steamfitter and the other on the assistant using high flow sampiers sampiers at 10 liters per minute indicated levels of 0.040f and 0.024 ec respectively during the sampling period This translates to an hour weighted average of 0.001 fico and 0.00065fcc respectively r ATLA ... EN . 1373 TIC RON ENTAL Inves ation of Asbestos Exposure during during Packing Replacement A... TS TA Th 4.0 CON LUS ON August 28 2 00 Air sapling sapling steam valve curre OSH avera over levels of app est results during replacement of asbestos containing packing into the dicare exposure to the operator and assistant that is significandy below the allowable limits Calculating the exposure limits for a weighted in hour day based upon the high flow samplers indicates exposure ximately 121 times lower than he current OSHA limit of 0.1f cc In conclusion conclusion this evaluation of employee exposure during the replacement of asbestos conta ing pr king materials indicates that the overall exposure of individuals performing packing packing repli ement in conditions and circumstances involved in this test does not pose a sig ficant ealth risk bp: | Report prepa ed by El El El El ElM MT MTT Frederick M. Toca MT CIH President 3/30/10 3/30/10 ; 3/30/10 3/30/10 3/30/10 3/30/10 Testchamber " sexing iccrment e eg KURDITERFASTESTANTEW