Document v65Q196jQ0nJNwJrO4dBVqawb

\t.y Xaroh Z? 2963 * HOVELL KB* A* H, EKSET^ a, S* B, STEVENS as. w. H. O'CONNELL . M, WILSON KB* J. 3* TRCKB MR. X. Kn BITCHIE 001301. PB. J, L* KOHUN KB. E> B. KC BRIDE PB. h.. a. caoRir:: PH. B> P. KC KES PB. fi, B. LAMKIN U W. SMITH gt8 ils^ S JWW r^JECT; COMPETITIVE AUDIT COttPlIATTOI, KASCH 1963. Attached is the cosplletjon of audits of competitive materials received end tested from Nevesber 1962 to Hsroh `.963- The figures reported for B^K-H ere the we lilted .-.veragsa for the full year 1962. It cannot be emphasised <oo strongly that the values reported for competitive fasterla1b are Individuals, not averages* These individual slues may overstate or understate the normal quality level of eon uaterial by some amount decoding on the normal ?2nge of variation of each particular process* Cooper.isone between B-S-H averages and competitive lndlv^uaTj. values _ "^ould nqfc be cade, except in a Tyrrjgen&ral.Hay* These general observations can be made* 1* All manufacturers except Hundet and B-E-H can pro duce material good to 1350 P. undar soaring heat. 2* Compressive strengths for TheraobeBtos ere amazing ly high. 3, Mundefc, Pabeo, B-E-K and Carey have either reduced fiber quality or Quantity as shown by significantly letter *mpsct strengths* JDK/rl 3, HC AIXISTES MC 422162 G 0003 WV-05836 0 0 0 0* f'C 4 2 2 *9 7 ,,s5*f*f* . ... ta & o