Document rx17yDMBQ5BjXjzJVRwreb9Kr

FILE NAME Corning OC DATE 1967 DOC OC195 DOCUMENT DESCRIPTION Internal Report - Crosfield vs. Kaylo ft UNILEVER CROSFIELD . L process Advantages Advantages No need for expendive SID sylinders of using plass fibers as reinforce2 Offers opportunaistbyestos fres product possible 3. Helds precision molded product corners of product 4. Visual appearance air holes with square Manville Thermobestos Thermobestos superior to Kaylo par Disadvantages Disadvantages complicated Batch costs higher than those for Kayle 1. cooking of batch 2. Process more . filter press to form product 3. Process requires than Kayle to produce par 4. Product more expensive manufacturing costs with Manville Thermobestos Thermobestos Not adaptable to Berlin pan pouring process 5 all filter press products have 6. Higher density product higher densities than Kaylo 7. Inferior physical and handling properties divulged Corning cople permission permission without permision permission permis ion permis ion permis ion permision permission of of Fiberglas Corporation