Document rpYxK8ONBbVz6aB85LqEky2X7

DownloadSearchable PDFRandom document
PLAINTIFF' S EXHIBIT GF-1052 row 2SI9-:~4A *CE> I* *J.S. A. INTEROFFICE CORRESPONDENCE GAF Corporation COMPANY CONFIDENT!A TO LOCATION FROM LOCATION SUBJECT: date July 11, 1973 Mr. W. Fassuliotis (5) 140 West 51st Street R. C. Hylan Corporate Environmental Engineering Linden ST. LOUIS ASBESTOS SURVEY NO. 17 cc Mr, C. F. Bien Mr. T. A. Dent Mr. E. C. Gutzwiller Mr. H. J. Holloway Mr. B. Latuchie Mr. A. M. Sobkowicz Mr. S. J. Stempien EED Files This asbestos survey is composed of three parts. The first part consists of three all-day, two short term and three peak asbestos samples taken by St. Louis personnel on June 4, 6, 12, 28, 1973. The second part is composed of concurrent asbestos samples taken by St. Louis personnel during an OSHA visit on June 14, 1973. The third part is composed of four peak samples taken by T. P. Martin during his visit to the St. Louis plant on June 18, 1973. The results of these surveys are summarized below: A. Regular Survey Results Sample Identification Time(min) Fibers/cc(T\VA) #7 Beaterman (6/6) 250 1,86 #1 Beaterman (6/6) 240 2.39 Raw Material Highlift Oper. (6/28) 245 0. 85 Fibers/cc(short term) Lift Box Operator #1 Machine(6/4) 30 0. 76 Wet Saw Operator #1 Machine(6/4) 30 1.18 > Fibers/cc(Peak) Raw Material Unloader (6/12) 15 1. 70 Lead Mechanic (6/12) 15 0. 75 Raw Material - High Lift Oper.(6/28) 15 1. 13 MICH07780 Mr. W. Fassuliotis 140 West 51st Street July 11, 1973 Page 2 B. Concurrent OSHA Samples Sample IdentificationTime (min) Fibers/cc(TWA) #2 Lincoln Saw Operator (6/14) 221 0.33 Fibers/cc (Peak) #2 Lincoln Saw Operator (6/14) 19 0.59 Fibers/cc(short term) #1 Beaterman (6/14) 24 1. 94 #1 Beaterman (6/14) 61 0. 81 #7 Beaterman (6/14) 64 2.20 #7 Beaterman (6/14) 47 2. 01 C. Peaks (T. P. Martin) Fibers/cc(Peak) #7 Beaterman (6/18) 15 2. 0 #7 Beaterman (6/18) 15 J #1 Beaterman (6/18) 15 1.1 #1 Beaterman (6/18) 15 0.9 The concurrent sample taken on the #2 Lincoln Saw Operator during the OSHA visit is composed of four cartridges taken at equivalent times with the OSHA sample. A TWA has been calculated for this sample. As St. Louis personnel had only two sampling pumps, one pump had to be used for the two beatermen. Therefore, the results on these two job classifications are reported as short term results. However, the times on these two job classifications do coincide with two of the samples taken by the OSHA inspector. If you have any questions, please let us know. Attach. R. C. Hylan MICH07781