Document rp0rrMbqZ07QBn6V73prKmY2E

(Drislane - Purcell) 291 1 A No. I would say maybe it was '75 before they 2 were. I mean, you said most, several of them were busy on it 3 in '72. But when you say most, if I am saying most, most by 4 '75, perhaps. 5 Q Let me read a quote from your minutes August 1972, 6 quote, The committee discussed this and as most of them are 7 working on asbestos substitutes and some in particular have 8 marketed materials without asbestos, parentheses, primarily 9 metallics, closed parentheses, they felt this suggestion 10 would not be warmly received by many members, close quote. 11 Again what "this is" is substitutes for asbestos? 12 A Yeah. 13 Q Did I read that correctly? 14 A Sounds like it's correct, yes. 15 MR. FRIESTEDT: Objection to form. 16 BY MR. PURCELL: 17 Q Does that refresh your recollection that by 1972 18 most members were already working on substitutes for asbestos 19 and some of them had marketed materials that contained no 20 asbestos? 21 MR. FRIESTEDT: Objection to form. 22 A Apparently it was 1972 then. 23 MR. BOATTI: For clarification, is that most A.S.E. Reporting Service (518) 458-1091