Document rj9peDEop05bYXKrNQ9VL7M7
FILE NAME Firestone FIRE DATE 1978 Sept
DOC FIRE038
DOCUMENT DESCRIPTION UNC Mortality study of workers in 42 plants finds SMR for all cancer in retirees Lung Cancer SMR Ex 939
UNC - 1977
Mortality IC4 September 1978
Study
Pltf Exh
939
JACKSON 025904
Occupational Health Studies Group
SJ
THE UNIVERSITY OF NORTH CAROLINA
AT CHAPEL HILL
The University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill NCNB Plaza Suite 32 322A Chapel Hill N.C. 27514
September 27 1978
Joint Firestone Occupational Health Committee
Addressees
Dr. Dr.
Mr. Mr. Mr. Mr.
L. H. Ballou
Theodore Georgiadis
R.V. Hassmiller Peter Bommarito
Louis Beliczky
Jake Miller
Gentlemen
RECEIVED
1978
ner 1978
INDUSTRIAL HYGIENE
Enclosed is a copy of the report of the 1977 Mortality Study I.C. This study was begun by the Occupational Health Studies Group in January 1978. This is the first application of surveillance techniques using mortality registry and population enumeration procedures Although it was our stated intent to report in July I feel that this report still demonstrates the timeliness with which surveillance activities can yield health information
We were able to get data in time for this report from 42 of the 48 plants and local unions with which we work in the Joint Occupational Health Program We expect to report further for all 48 plants later in
the year
If you need additional copies of this report we will be pleased to provide them
Sincerely yours
dcm
Robert L. Harris Jr. Ph.D.
Director
Enclosure
Identical letter and enclosure sent to all Joint Committees
JACKSON 025905
1977 MORTALITY STUDY
RECEIVED
OCT 1978
INDUSTRIAL HYGIENA
INDUSTRIAL DEPARTUERT
Occupational Health Studies Group
School of Public Health
University of North Carolina Chapel Hill North Carolina
IC SEPTEMBER 1978
JACKSON 025906
1977 MORTALITY STUDY
by
Dale R. Herman M.S.P.H.
Dragana Andjelkovich M.D.
_
Robert DesJardins Ph.D.
4
Dianne Byrne M.S.P.H. Eileen Cella M.S.
7
Occupational Health Studies Group
School of Public Health
University of North Carolina .
_
Chapel Hill North Carolina
Submitted To
> The
Firestone
General
Goodyear and
Uniroyal
Joint Occupational Health Committees
SEPTEMBER 1978
JACKSON 025907
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS
We acknowledge with appreciation the professional advice of Dr.
Robert Harris Dr. Michael Symons and Dr. Herman A. Tyroler the statistical assistance of Ms. Claire Bourguet and Mr. Donald Doerfler
the programming expertise of Mr. Leland Jones and Mr. Chester Hoover
and the invaluable assistance in manuscript preparation and corres-
pondence Ms. Julie Banhart and Ms. Jackie Brown
JACKSON 025908
TABLE OF CONTENTS
wane
LIST OF TABLES-
eeee nese eee nee anne wenn
i
LIST OF APPENDICES-- ii
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY- fanaa SUMMARY- seen - iii
.I INTRODUCTION AND STUDY DESIGN-- nent 4]
II
DATA COLLECTION PROCEDURES- eawennecnne
6
A. The Creation of the Workforce Enumeration File ---
6
Selection of the Study Population-- a
B. Creating the Death Certificate File- -13
C. The Creation of the 1977 Mortality Analysis File- File- ------- 18
D. Processing Comparison Population Data- 20
III ANALYSIS AND RESULTSee eee eee
eee
were
21
IV
SUMMARY AND CONCLUSION- _ 30
REFERENCES
.32
TABL eee eeE e n S e - e 34
JACKSON 025909
LIST OF TABLES
Table 1
Table 2
,
Deaths Distribution of Population and
a
by Age and Sex wae
e
eset
ncceee
34
Observed and Expected Deaths and SMR's for
Major Disease Categories among Males for All
Plants
Combined- saa Doran anon naa=
nana
anna
35
Table 3
Observed and Expected Deaths and SMR's for Neoplasms among Males for All Plants Combined--
- 36
Table 4
: |
Table 5
Table 6
Observed and Expected Deaths and SMR's for
Circulatory Disease among Males for All
.
Plants Combined-- Combined-- nner nnnn nese ene
37
Observed and Expected Deaths and SMR's for
Major Disease Categories among Females for
All
Plants
Combined- Combined-
------ -
.
Observed and Expected Deaths and SMR's for
Neoplasms among Females for All Plants Combined
38
39
Table 7
Table 8
.
Observed and Expected Deaths and SMR's for
'
Circulatory Disease among Females for All
;
Plants Combined-- Combined-- errr ennn---
a
40 -
SMR's by Plant for Males for Selected Major
Disease Categorieas nne- nen- e anne nen . 41
Table 9 Table 10
SMR's by Plant for Males for Selected Causes
.
of
onan
Death
on nanan
wennen ns
nanan
-~----
Major SMR's SMR's by Plant for Females for Selected
'
Disease Categories- Categories- -
1.42 43
Table 11.
Table 12
'
Comparison of Mortality Rates Between Rubber|
Industry All Plants Combined U.S.
Population for All Causes of Death among Males-
44
Comparison of Mortality Rates Between Rubber-
Industry All Plants Combined and U.S.
Circulatory among Population for All
Deaths
Males- more seennen- meee eter tn enn r enn ne- mann:
45
Table 13
Comparison of Mortality Rates Between Rubber |
Industry All Plants Combined and U.S.
Population for All Neoplasms among Males-
46
JACKSON 025910
LIST OF APPENDICES
Appendix I.
Appendix II
List of Individual Plants nnn 47
Employees the Diagram : Types of Employees
-Included in
Study Population- Pieietatatatatatatatateteteetatate _.
48
ene
Appendix III . Data Analysis Program-awen-------
neeneesnnee .
49
}
-
ii
JACKSON 025911
Executive Summary
Mortality studies have great value in assessing the health experience |
Occupational years of occupational groups
past Over the
several
the
|
Health Studies Group has completed a number of studies of mortality experience among populations of workers from individual plants and local .
unions These studies have dealt with deaths which occurred in past
years Most have used the 10 year interval 1964-1973
The Occupational Health Studies Group as part of its obligation
under the Company Joint Occupational Health Prograhams also been
developing a health surveillance system A major part of such a system
is surveilolf acunrrcenet mortality experience The study described in
this report is the first application of surveillance techniques to
current mortality experience The study covers 1977 the most current .
year of mortality experience and it includes all of the plants and
|
local unions inthe Joint Occupational Health Program
_ Oneobjectivoef the study was timely reporting Our stated intention
|
was to report in the first six months of . 1978. Although this report has
been delayed beyond that time a number of tasks which have been done'
will be useful in
in the future
subsequent reportansd will
| |
permit more rapid
reporting
|
The
University
of
North
Carolina
works
with
48
in
plants
the
Joint>
Occupational Health Program Data relative to this study for six of
these plants were not available during the first half of this year As
a consequence this report is limited to analysis of data from 42 plants Further analyses are underway and 48 plants will be included in
subsequent report
iii
JACKSON 025912
A total of 1,277 deaths are known to have occurred in 1977 among
the 79,500 active and retired rubber workers from the 42 plants included
in this report The relatively few deaths among women 149 deaths do
not permit extensive analysis The overall mortality experience for the
year among female workers was not markedly different from that of the general population More detailed analysis among male workers was
possible The Standardized Mortality Ratio SMR which compares the
mortality experience of the study population to that of men of the same :
ages in the general population is used in reporting results An SMRof
100 means that the study population and the general population had the
same mortality experience A higher value greater than 100 means that ; more deaths occurred among the study population than were expected based
general population experience and an SMR lower than 100 means fewer
than expected numbers of deaths occurred among the rubber worker group ~
The SMR for all causes of death in 1977 among male rubber workers
in the 15-64 year age range was 73 that for retired workers in the 64- _
84 year age range was 106. The SMR of 73 for the active age range
reflects the healthly worker effect which has been identified in
our
studies and by others with actively employed workers The SMR of 73 for
deaths from all causes in the active age range makes SMR values greater
-
than than 100 for any specific causes of death even more
noteworthy |
|
would be the case with a higher causes SMR
The SMR for all forms of cancer among retired rubber workers in the
study was 119. This is a statistically significant excess and consistent
with findings of several other epidemiologic studies done for past
years SMR's for a number of site specific cancers were elevated for
iv
JACKSON 025913
|
this group Particularly noteworthy is the statistically significant
excess of lung cancers SMR = 145 this is in contrast to the results
of our earlier mortality studies on several individual plant populations
This finding merits further serious investigation An excesosf cancers
of the lymphataincd hematopoietic systems SMR = 135 among active
workers was also found this excess although real was not statistically
significant the 95 percent level of confidence A similar excess
SMR = 130 was found for leukemia among retired workers These latter two findings are consistent with results of past studies
Overall and cause specific mortality experience as was expected varied among the individual plants Some statistically significant
excesses were
merit further
observed for attention
some
causeosf
death
in some
|
plants
These
|
The importance of annual mortality surveys increases as times goes by and as results for successive years become available Such surveys
provide data for comparisons and for detectioonf trends and changeisn
the health of working populations A major purpose of studies such as
this is to identify plant population and disease types which need more
detailed investigatiwiotnh the ultimate goal being to recommend actions
which remove hazards to the health of workers
BATO JACKSON 025914
I.
INTRODUCTION AND STUDY DESIGN .
The 1977 Mortality Study is an analysiosf the deaths among
approximately aproximately 94,000 active and retired hourly workers who were members of the United Rubber Workers Union and who during the year 1977 were
forty employed at or retired from one of the
plants which are |
affiliated with the occupational health research program at the Uni-
| | |
versity of North Carolina
Past cohort studies conducted by the Occupational Health Studies .-
Group OHSG at the University of North Carolina have concentrated on
single plants and have been retrospective in nature reconstructing a
workforce at some time in the past and then following that group of
people for long periods to determine their mortality experience The-
cost of such studies and the time involved prevented us from conducting-
similar studies for all of the plants in the industry Yet observations
made
at one plant raised questions about other similar plants It was -
clearly desirablteo be able to study all of the plants in the industry
Other studies done in the past have examined data from a large number of
plants but have done so using a proportional analysis which again raised
questions makinigt obvious that a more definitive study was necessary
Past studies have gone back in time and although they could give much
information about the experience of workers some years back we felt that
it was important to conduct a study based on the most current data
-
available which would be more pertinent to workers today
- The OHSG has been collecting death certificates on an ongoing basis
for most of the plants in this study since 1972.
We have not previously
|
enumerated the entire population of workers for the four companies
aan
JACKSON 025915
Based on our experience it was obvious that until a weestablished
continuous surveillance system which included enumerations of both the
entire workforce and all of the deaths an industry mortality study
~
would be difficult time consuming and expensive With the establish-
ment of an efficient means of enumerating the population as part of the
surveillance system this study has become possible |
7
The initial plan for this study was presented at the Company
University scientific meetings at the OHSG in December 1977. With the
cooperation of representatives present at the meet froi m tn he g Unios n .
and from each of the four companies the study was begun in January -
| | |
1978
The purposes of this study are
1 To test and documetnhte feasibility of conducting a cross- -
company mortality study on an ongoing basis as part of an
|
|
overall surveillance system in the industry
2
To explore differences morttha e l moi rtat liy ty experience of the
rubber industranyd that of a comparison population
3
To identify differences in mortality experience between plants
and processes
4 To compare the mortality experience in 1977 with that reported
earlier by the OHSG
This study is unique our knowledge this is the first time that
the annual mortality experiencoef a working population has been studied
in a cohort fashion We see as an important contribution to the ~
health of workers in the rubber industry to be able to condausc tut dy ~
of this nature and report on it within six to nine months of the end of
a
year
The value of this study will increase as the study is repeated
JACKSON 025916
each year permitting comparisontso be made between years and making it
possible to observe trends in mortality in the rubber industry
wide
The study demonstrates
Pay
annual mortality study
that it is
within six
feasible to prepare an industry-
to nine months after the end of
the year provided that most of the information is which required for
the study be made available in computer readable form from corporate
|
headquarters rather than from the individual plants Although few
companies maintain files that are specifically designed for occupational
health research almost all of the information which is required for a
mortality analysis can be obtained from files which are maintained for
operational purposes such as the administration of benefit programs and
personnel management With the cooperation of the participating com-
panies this information can be obt qua itei rapin dly e andd can be processed
very easily thus making it economically feasible to prepare an annual
mortality study for the active
+ Since the major objective
and retired employees
of the 1977 Mortality Study was
to develop
the data collection procedures and the data analysis programs which are
required to enumerate a complete study population and to investigate the
causes of death among the deceased members of that population this report 1 summarizes the procedures which were used to collect data for
the 1977 Mortality Study 2 discusses some of the difficulties which~ |
were encountered in implementing these procedures 3 describes the
data analysis programs which were developed and 4 presents some pre- ._
liminary results from an analysis of the data for 79,496 employees who
worked at 42 plants second report which will be completed by the -.
end of the year
all 48 plants
will
contain more
7
a
extensive analyses of
.
:
the data from
.
ee
|
JACKSON 025917
A mortality analysis is the first step in a comprehensive program
of health surveillance Morbidity information environmental exposure |
data and personal health information are also required to monitor the
health conditions in an industrial setting The 1977 Mortality Study is
the beginning of a comprehensive health surveillance system which is being developed by the OHSG for the workers in the rubber products industry Other OHSG surveillance research projects are presently :
developing procedures for the collection and processing of several types
:
of related information These studarie e als so concerned with the development of procedures which will protect the privacy of the individuals who are included in the study population As the results of
these studies become available they will be incorporatinetdo future mortality studies so that the scope of the analyses can be expanded to provide a more accurate assessment of health conditions in the rubber products industry 7
The 1977 Mortality Study is a cohort study of mortality in the
rubber industry A cohort study is a study of a group of people the
cohort or study population who all have some characteriisn tcoimcmosn
This study population is followed for a period of time to observe the
occurrence of disease among its members The experience of the studystudy
population is compared with the experience of some other population often the total U.S. population to detect what health hazards the
. study population may be exposed to For the present study the common characteristics are membershiipn
the United Rubber Workers Union URW and employment in one of the plants participating in the Joint Occupational Health Program in the four
companies Firestone General Goodyear and Uniroyal in the rubber
JACKSON 025918
industry The group people defined by these characteristics can actually be separated into two distinct cohorts The first cohort
consists of all URW members who were active employees at one of the 48
plants listed in the appendix at any time during the year 1977. The
second cohort consists of all URW members who were retired from one of
plants these 48
prior to Januar1y 1977 but who were living on that |
date Although the discussion which follows on data collection and
preparation deals with these as a single population the analyses were done separately and the results section of this report treats them as
ae
separate groups
The data necessary for this study were a complete enumeration of the study population including age sex racae nd employment status on each person in the study date of death and cause of death for each -
deceased person in the study the number of people in the comparison
population in this case the U.S. population together with the age
sex and race distribution of this population and the number of deaths
by cause of death for each age sex and race group in the comparison ;
population The information on the study population came from records
from the four companies and from death certificates obtained from the
companies their insurance carriers and from state health departments
The number of people in the comparison population came from a publica-
tion of the Bureau of the Census 1 and the information on deaths.in deaths.in
the U.S. came from data generated by the National Center for Health :
Statistics and provided to us on computer tapes 2 The most recent
information available on deaths within the U.S. U.S. was for the year1975.so 1975.so
the data for that year were used for comparison-
JACKSON 025919
II DATA COLLECTION PROCEDURES
The 1977 Mortality Study required the creation of two major da,,>a
files the Workforce Enumeration File and the Death Certificate File
These files were created separately and are maintained separately to
provide a cross checokn the completaned n ace cursacsy of the informa-
- tion which was collected for the study Section A below describes the 7
procedures which were usetdo create the Workforce Enumeration File and . Section B the describes procedures which were used to collect informa-
tion for the Death Certificate File After both files been.com- been.com-
pleted the information from the Death Certificate File was merged with
the information on the Workforce Enumeration File to creat thee 1977 -
Mortality Study File which was used to prepare the mortality analyses The procesosf merging the two files is a critical step in the study
procedure because any unexplained deaths which are identified at that point must be explained before the mortality analysis can be undertaken
The procedures which were used for merging the two working files to
create 1977 Mortality Study File are described in Section C. Sec-
tion D describes the processing of data for the comparison population .
A. The Creation of the Workforce Enumeration File The first step in the creation of the workforce enumeration file
active was the collection of information concerning all
and retired
|
employees from each of the participating companies We requested this
information from corporate headquarters rather than from the local-
plants for the following reasons
JACKSON 025920
1 If the data we receive for each company were processed at one
central location the methods used to collect code and store
the information would be more likely to be consistent
2. Computer readable data which is much easier for us to work
with are more likely to be available from corporate head-
quarters | 3 The data for all the plants for each company would be sent to
us in common format with the same information being avail-
able
4 We would work with a smaller number of computing centers and
all the data for one company would arrive at OHSG at the same
- time and could be copied and editeidn one batch . The strategoyf obtaining the required information from a single source for each company worked quite well. We were able to obtain a
single file of retired employees from each of the four participating
companies three of these files were sent to us in a computer readable
form We were also able to obtain most of the information concerning -
active employees from a single source for each of three companies a few
|
plant files were required to supplement the data received from one .
|
company but the fourth company could only provide us with files from
each of the participating plants All information on active employees was received ina computer readable form except for the information
one plant which was provided on computer prepared listing -
Selection of the Study Population
In January 1978a letter was sent each company requesting the following information for all hourly employees who worked at one of the
BATO JACKSON 025921
participating plants during 1977 and retired employees who had previously
worked at one of the participating plants and were living as of January
1 1977
Identifying Information
Name .Social Security Number and Company Identification Number
Demographic Information
Date of birth
Sex Race
Employment Information
Planatt which the employee is currently working if active or
the last plant at which the employee worked if retired -
Date of initial employment and
-
Union Membership
Current employment status and the
the continuous service date
SS
date this status became effective
If avail theafb olll owie ng information was also requested
Department in which the employee currently works Current job assignment code or job title Date and type of retirement if retired
Date of death if deceased ;
The responses to this request varied from company to company generally
included information on all hourly employees
The first step in the processing of this data involved the selection
of those employees who were to be included in the study population
Three basic constrainwterse critical to the formulation of the criteria
/
which were used to select the study population
1 Members of the study population had to be members of the URW
Union and had to work one of the 48 plants which
| | |
included in the OHSG contract .
2
A person included in the study population only if the
person was entitled to life insurance benefits so wecould be
.
JACKSON 025922
fairly sure that we would learn of each death through the
company insurance office if the person died during 1977
3 Data for all categories of people included had to be consistently recorded in the data files from each of the four
;
companies which were included in the study .
The first constraint is probably not too critical to the resultosf this study but is does prohibit the inclusion of salaried employees ,
such as supervisors who frequently work for many years as hourly em- .
ployees and who still have environmental exposures which are similar to
| |
those of the hourly employees
The second constraint is more important because it eliminates all
employees who left the companies prior to 1977 who did not receive a
termination allowance or a pension This constraint not critical to
the 1977 Mortality Study because we made no efforts to obtain information
on former employees as would be done in retrospective study However
this constraiwniltl become more important for the 1978 Mortality Study because we must decide if we will keep short term employien ethse
workforce enumeration file and attempt to obtain death certificatferosm
|
sources other than the company insurance offices are presently
at plant analyzing the data which was collected
one pilot surveillance
. |
a part of the experimental surveillance system to guidues in the
development of appropriate selection rules for the 1978 Mortality Study
The third constraint had an important effect on the 1977 Mortality
Study Since some employees who received termination awards or deferred
pensions do not qualify for life insurance and since we were not able to
obtain information concerning these people from some of the companies
we decided to eliminate all of the employees in this group from the
BATO JACKSON 025923
10
study population even though we received a large number of death certifi-
cates for these employees We are investigating alternative procedures
|
which might be used so this group of employees can be included in future
| | |
mortality studies
| Using these constraints the following rules were developed to oa
select employees for inclusion in the study population These
illustrated in Diagram 1 in the appendix
|
1 The employee had to be an hourly worker - who was a member of
the URW Union and who worked at one of the 48 plants which
were included in the study-
2
The employee had to work at least one day during 1977 if
she had not retired before Januar1y 1977 and was not on
|
leave for the entire year
3 The employee had to have received a pension during 1977. if
she had retired before January , 1977
4 Employees who were on leave during 1977 were includeidn the
- population provided that they had life insurance benefits so i
that the company would have received a death certificate if
they had died during 1977
It should be noted that the use of these rules eliminated the
| |
following following employees from the study population | .
1. employees who were on Jan priou r toa Janr uary y 1 1977 and did not return to work before December 31 1977. Because of
the Union members' rights there are probably very few if any employees in this category who will return to work at
a later date If such employees do exist they will be picked- -
up in future mortality studies.
JACKSON 025924
11
2 All employees who went on educational leave or military leave
priotro January , 1977 and did not return to work before
December 31 1977. There is a very small number of employees
in this group These employees will be picked in subse-
quent mortality studies if and when they return to work
.3
All employees who terminated with a lump sum payment award or
|
who left with a deferred vested pension prior to January 1
1977. Employees in this category who retired during 1977 were :
included in the 1977 Mortality Study and will be included in
all subsequent studies We hope to be able to add all of the employees in this group retroactively to the workforce
enumeration file for future mortality studies
4. All salaried employees unless they transferred from hourly to
salaried status during 1977.
|
We will not be able to include
these employees in future studies unless arrange to collect
the death certificates for all salaried employees and obtain
agreement to extend the study to include selected employees
who are not currently members of the URW Union
Since the data for retirees and active employees were received from -
different sources for each company , we initially created two separate
files for each company file for active employees and one file for
retirees
These
files
were
edited
to
identify
missing
data
-
duplicate
~
records and data discrepancies - Whenever data for an employee were
missing or apparent discrepancies were discovered record was checked
and corrected if necessary For example employees employees who records
which indicated that they began work before they were 14 years old oo
sometimes before they were born or were still actively employed
BATO JACKSON 025925
12
although they were more than 65 years old were identified and the
accuracy of the recorded information was checked Since the corporate
headquarters do not have the original data files for the hourly em-
ployees error lists had to be prepared for each plant These lists were sent to the personnel offices at each of the plants with requests
to check the original records to obtain the correct or missing informa-
tion At the time of this report we have received the missing informa-
tion or corrections from all but 12 plants eight plants have not yet >
responded to our requests and four plants have not yet been contacted because we receive thde initial information concerning the workforce at these plants very recently Only six of the twelve plants have a signi-
ficant amount of missing information thus we were able to include 42
plants in the preliminary analyses which are included in this report
Race was information not recorded on most of the files which were
obtained from the corporate headquarters Since race is known to be an
important variable in mortality analysis we made a special effort to
obtain race information for the 1977 Mortaltiy Study Race informationinformation
which had been obtained for several plants from company for earlier
OHSG studies was transferred to the Workforce Enumeration Files for both
the active and retired employees Lists of employees for whom we did /.
each the not have race information were prepared for
plant because
only
|
source of race information is the original employee records which are
a
stored at the plants These lists were sent either directly to the
local planot r s to the corporate headquarters for forwardtionthge .
local plants At the thoi f ts his report race information has been
obtained for all active employees of three companies and all re-
tireeosf one company Since race is still missing for a large number --
JACKSON 025926
of employees the preliminary mortality analyses which are included in
this report do not use race as a variable However race information
will be used in the mortality analyses which will be run at a later
|
|
|
|
date
After the active and retiree files for each company had been edited . and all available correction entered the two files for each company
were merged to create a single Workforce Enumeration File for each company Since the employees who retired in 1977 were entered in both
the active and retiree files the duplicate records for these employees | had to be removed The resulting file was later merged with the Deat|h-
Certificate File to create a 1977 Mortality Study File for each company
B.
Creating the Death Certificate File
Death certificate processing is an important part of any mortality
study , especially if the study involves comparison among companieosr comparisons with national vital statistics . Comparability is best
achieved by following clearly defined processing procedures which in- |
clude the coding of the cause of death by certified nosologist an
expert in determining the underlying cause of death from the information
provided by the attending physician on the death certificate and in coding this information in accordance with International Classifi-
|
cation of Diseases
. |
Although the size of the 1977 Mortality Study required few modi-
fications and careful implementation the procedures which were used to
process the death certificates for this study are essentially the same .
as the procedures which have been used by OHSG personnel to process
death certificates for retrospective epidemiologic studies The major - -
steps in this procedure are described below
JACKSON 025927
14
In January 1978 a letter was sent to the medical director or his counterpart at each company requesting a copy of the death certificate .
for each hourly active employee or retiree who died in 1977. The medical
directors forwarded this request either to the company insurance department
or to the insurance company which underwrites the company's life insurance
program
Since OHSG receives many death certificates for other research projects some of the requested death certificates were already on file
at OHSG before the request was sent However most of the death cer-
tificates had to be duplicated and processed after the request was
- received in January Most of these death certificates were received by
the end of March but a large number of certificates were delayed for
several months We received more than 110 death certificates almost
10 of the total number received after July % the last large group | was
received about August 15. Although some death certificataerse still
outstanding the time of this report we had received complete death
certificate information concerning about 99 of the known 1977 deaths
In addition to death certificates we also requested proof
forms and a year claims listing as they were available
a
Although
claims listings do not include information on the cause of death and
may not always be complete they are very useful for checking our
records to be sure that we have received all certi deaf thicecrta ift ice ats es
When a requested death certificate had not been received we checked with
the company to determine if they had received it If they had not yet
receiveidt we requested supplementary information such as the social.
security number and the state in which the death occurred so could
request a death certificate from the vital statistics of office that
JACKSON 025928
.15
state Because of the lengthy delays involved in obtaining information
from some states we attempted to obtain as much information as possible from the companies However if the company did not have the death
certificate the state vital statistics office is usually the only other
|
source of information
_
Death certificates were usually received and processed in groups
|
Therefore the processing procedure was designed so we could account for
each certificate in a group after the processing for that group of death
certificates had been completed The steps in the processing procedure
are as follows
1 Since some companies send OHSG copy of the death certificate
for all deceased employees the first step in processing each
group of death certificates was to remove all certificates for
|
employees who were obviously not included in the 1977 Mortality oo
Study All certificates for deaths which did not occur in
1977 were removed first other certificates were removed if
information provided by the company indicated that the employee
was not an hourly worker nota member of the URW Union or did
not work at one of the 48 plants which were included in the
study The number of death certificates which were removed.. - durti hisnstg ep was noted and the death certificates were
filed for future reference or use in other OHSG studies
2 All county city and local death certificates were removed and
replacement certificates were requested from the state office. _ of vital statistics It has been found that the forms issued ~
by countoyr local registrars of vital events may omit some of
the
causes
of
death
or
list
them
in
a
different
-
sequence than
_
JACKSON 025929
16
the official state certificate does Since these discrepancies
can affect the coding of the causoef death we use only those
death certificates which are issued by the state
All of the informatioonn the remaining death certificates was
checked for legibility and completeness The information was
other :
also checked to see if it was consistent with any
infor- .
mation which was available from proof forms or claims
listings Minor errors omissions or inconsistencies were
corrected by using informatito hant was available at OHSG or
by contacting the corporate insurance office or the local-
|
planatt which the employee workeIdf much of the information
was illegible a copy of the death certificate was requested
from the state vital statistics office If the causoef death
was illegibloer listed as pending the state vital statistics
office was contacted to obtain a supplementary medical certi|
fication of the cause of death
Each death certificate which was complete and legible was
copied and a nosology form was attached The certificates
were counted and the group of certificates was sent to the
nosologist for coding
|
When the coded certificates were returned to OHSG they were
checked to be sure that they were all returned and that the
coding was complete If the nosologist had not been able to read the cause of death information a new copy of the death~
certificate was requested from the state vital statistics
office and the certificate was recycled through the processing -- ae
procedure
JACKSON 025930
17
6 The coded death certificates were then sent to data processing
to be converted into a computer readable form and entered into
the death certificate file The information on each certificate
was typed on an OCR Optical Character Recognition typewriter
and was entered into the computer file via an optical character
reader Each certificate was typed by two different operators |
and both copies were entered into the computer which compared - ~ 7
them to determine if they were exactly the same If any
'
differences were noted the records were printed the differ- .
ences were rectified and both records were again entered into the computer When no differences were detected the information was added to a working file When the processing for the entire batch of death certificates was completed it was added
to the Death Certificate File
7 After most of the death certificates had been received and
processed the information on the Death Certificate File was -
merged with the information on the Workforce Enumeration File Since death certificate information is available from a restricted
number of sources and is not available in a computer readable form the processing of death certificatweis ll always be time consuming However
the time required to process the death certificates for an annual _ mortality study could be substantially reduced if all of the companies
would followa few guidelines when they prepare death certificates for OHSG We would like to suggest that the following guidelines be adopted
for future studies
1. We are aware of the fact that the copies of the death cer-
tificates which are sent to the companies are sometimes barely _
JACKSON 025931
greatly legible Our work would be
expedited if the copies of
|
death certificates which are sent to OHSG are as clear as
7
possible
|
|
2. Checking for the completeness of death certificates is greatly
7
expedited by the availability of a claims listing Thus we
et would appreciate receiving a copy of the year claims | co
listing if it is available - .
3 It is useful to have the employee's employe's pay status hourly or
salary and plant entered on the death certificate especially especially
if this information is not on an accompanying insurance claims
listing or if a proofdeath insurance form containing this
information is not attached to the death certificate :
C. The Creation of 1977 Mortality Analysis File After the Workforce | Enumeration File for each company was completed
it was compared with the Death Certificate File and death information te
was added to all matching records on the workforce file During this
process lists were made of all of the records either file for which matching records should have existed but were not found All of these
unmatched records were then checked to determine why matching records
did not exist
.
.
.
All employees on the workforce file who were coded as deceased in
1977 should also have had a record on the Death Certificate File Some -
did not To determine why these death certificate records did not .
employees exist we contacted the local plants to find out if these
had
|
indeed died in 1977 and were URW hourly workers In the majority of
cases the date which was recorded as the death date was actually a
JACKSON 025932
.19
benefit payment date and the death itself occurred prior to 1977. Since
this study did not include deaths which occurred before 1977 these records were removed from the workforce enumeration file At the time
of this report all but five deceased records on the workforce file
which did not match the death certificate file have been explained and
| 7
appropriate corrections made
Since each record on the Death Certificate File represents a 1977
|
death there should also have been a matching record on the Workforce
Enumeration File. All death certificate records without a matching Work-
force Enumeration record were listed and the cause of the discrepancy :
was investigated The majoritoyf these matches were for employees-
who left the company witha termination award priotro 1977 and who - ;
were not included in the study population for the 1977 Mortality Study In a few cases we discovered that an employee for whom we received a
death certificate did meet the criteria for inclusion in the 1977 Mor-
-
tality Study but the employee's record was not included in the workforce '
information which we had received from the company Apparently these
records had been deleted from the company's file when pension benefits .
were discontinued thus we did not receive the record when they copied . the file for us in the Spring of 1978. By using some information which -
one company had provided for another study in 1976 we were able to identifalyl such deleted records for that company and to add every|
record which met our selection criteria to the 1977 Mortality File For another company letters had bebe written to the local plants
to determine if the unmatched records should be addetdo the Workforc~e~
Enumeration File At the time of this report answers had not been
received from all plants so there are still 23 records of 1977 deaths'
_
ae
JACKSON 025933
20
for which we do not have a record the Workforce Enumeration File We ~ cannot add these 23 records to the 1977 Mortality Study until we have
oe
received information from the local plants
Because of the problems we have had in obtaining some information
and removing all known errors from the information which we have received the mortality analyses which are presented in this report are preliminary
analyses which are based on approximately 85 percent of the total study
population By the time the final report is written before the end of 1978 we hope to be able to determine whether these 23 deaths should be included and we hopeto have adequate data for the six plants which are
excluded from this report
D. Processing Comparison Population Data
As mentioned in the Introducdt atia ofonr the U.S. population came
froma publication of the Bureau of the Census This data was key oo
.
punched and double checked for accuracy by OHSG staff The information
on deaths in the U.S. however came to us on computer tape The file we received from the National Center for Health Statistics had about
1,900,000 records on it or onerecor fodr each death in the U.S. during
the year 1975 identification information had been removed This
massive file had to be copied and summarized by the OHSG data processing
staff The summary data from this file was then compared with the ;
published mortality figures for 1975. The 1975 mortality data has not
yet been published in the detail needed for this study so the procedure
used provided us with early access to recent data'
JACKSON 025934
III ANALYSIS AND RESULTS
The mortality of the rubber workers studied was analyzed and is
reported here in terms of age standardized mortality ratios SMR's SMR's
The SMR is the ratio of the number of deaths in the study population to
the number of deaths which would be expected based on the mortality mortality - -
experience of the comparison population To adjust for the age distri-
bution differences between the study population and the comparison
population the
|
year age group
numbers of expected
and these are added
deaths are calculated for together to get the total
each five
|
number
expected Although the final formula for an SMR includes only the
number of deaths observed and expected -
oo
observed number of deaths = SMR number of deaths expected X 100
the earlier steps in this calculation involve the computation of death
greater rates The SMR is uaually multiplied by 100 so that an SMR
than
|
100 means that more deaths were observed in the study population than
would be the case if the same death rates appltioetd he study popula-
tion as were present the comparison population Conversely an SMR
less than 100 means that the study population had fewer deaths than it
present would have had the same death rates applied to it as were
in
>
|
|
the comparison population .
Mortality rates for most diseases change over time It is there--
fore important that the comparison population data be as close time
to the study population dataas possible As was mentioned above the .
most recent U.S. data available were for the year 1975. These were
obtained from the Bureau of the Census and the National Center for
Health . Statistics The death rates used for comparison in this study
JACKSON 025935
22
were then calculated the OHSG Since the data from the National
;
Center for Health Statistics NCHS were provided on computer tape they
were checked for accuracy against preliminary figures publishebdy the
| |
| |
NCHS
Because of the uniqueness of this study in looking at mortaliftoyr
.
many plants during only one year a special computer program was written
to analyze the data This program is discussed briefly in the appendix -
The mortality experience of the rubber workers in this study was
analyzed separatefloyr males and females for 42 of the 48 plants in the
study The remaining six plants will be in included the final report to
be released befo theree nd of the year These six plahn avetbes en
, omitted from this report because of inadequate daIt t a was mentioned
earlier that this studiys compriosf etwdo separate populations namely
active employees and retirees These are separated in this report by
age those under 65 being considered as active employees and those over
65 being consiads e rer tie red es Because there are retirees under the
age of 65 a further refinement of this separatiwoilnl occur in future | |
reports
Death certificates have been located for 99 percent of the known~ deaths All causes of death stateodn the death certificates were coded
by a qualified nosologist according to the Eighth Revi ofs thi e Io nten r-
7
national Classification of Diseases Adapted for Use in the United States
(3)
ICDA
i
|
Included in this study are 48 plants ranging in size from less than
100 to over 5500 hourly workers During the year 1977 over 65,000
people were active employees employees in plants These plants are scattered
throughout 22 states The major concentratioonf the plants in the .
JACKSON 025936
23
East North Central geographic region including Ohio Indiana Illinois
Michigan and Wisconsin where 20 plants are located with a totaolf over
23,000 actively employed hourly workers
In Ohio
alone
there
are
~~
seven
plants from all four companies employing approximately 21,000 hourly
_ workers In addition to the active employees there are over 25,000
retirees from these 48 plants As mentioned mentioned above this report covers 42 7
of the 48 plants including 79,496 active and retired rubber workers As
can be seen from the age and sex distribution in Table 1 79 percent of
the population was in the active age range while the remaining 21 per- -
cent was at least 65 years of age Approximately 87 percent of the
acti werv e e mals es and 78 percenotf the retireweesre males
to occurred During 1977 a total of 1277 deaths are known have
_
within the study population of 42 plants Most of these occurred among
retirees with 331 deaths among those under age 65. Of these 1277 deaths|
1128 were among males and 149 among females .
Tables 2 thr 7 o of tu hisg reph ort present SMR's for various disease categories for all 42 plants combined Because all plants are combined ~
for these tables many very different processes and chemical exposures
are included and it should not be assumed that because an SMR is low :
there are no problems in the industry relative to that cause of death : Looking at large heterogeneous groups such as the rubber industry as a whole may mask specific conditions which exisitn subgroups of the
population 4,5 On the other hand a high SMR does not necessarily -
mean that every plant in the industry has a problem with that particular
disease At the same time high SMR in these tables should be taken
seriously Because it is based on the experience of thousands of workers
it is not likely to be a chance happening It may either represent
JACKSON 025937
24
a serious problem at a few plantosr it may be a rather widespread
_
problem in the industry
_ The next step the analysis is to look at individual plants to
see if there are particular problems at some plants Tables & through
10 present SMR's for the individual plants In order to prevent iden-
tification of specific plants each plant was assigned a numbeart random.
and only that number appears as identification in the tables In addition the numbers of observe andd expected deaths do not appear in
Tables8 throug1h0. The URW will given a list of the plant codes
and each company will be given a list identifying only its own plants Tables 2 through 7 show the numbers ofobserveandd expected deaths
for each cause listed SMR's however have been calculated for only -
those causes which have at least five observed deaths becaoufsthee
statistical instability of rates which are based on small numbers
While not reporting some high but probably meaningless SMR's some
posbust ipobssliby ly meaningful SMR's will remain unreported well
Although Tables 8 through 10 do not report numbers of observed and
expected deaths the same rule applies for calculating SMR's Dashes in
the tables represent plants or diseases with fewer than five deaths as
well as the six plants not included in this report
The test of statistical significance used in this report is the .2
test
expected x observed deaths -
x _
expected deaths
2
deaths )
>
.. Although SMR's are not reported for fewer than five deaths each cause of _
death was examined and a test for statistical significance based on the
Poisson distribution was usetdo check the probabilitthayt what was
~~
observed was a chance occurrence These cases are discussed later
BATO JACKSON 025938
26
do not currently have death certificates were included in this category
When death certificates are obtained these deaths will be reclassified
| |
to other disease groups
Diseases of the circulatory system account for about 54 percenotf
all deaths Similarly in the U.S. general population about 55 percent
of all deaths are attributed to circulatory diseases The next most
frequent cause of death was neoplasms which accounted for 23 percent of
the total deaths Because these two groups of diseases consist of
categories - several smaller disease
of special interest they are pre-
|
sented in more detail in Tables 3 and 4
As seen in Table 3 several site specific neoplasms have elevated
SMR's in the study population In the active group stomach cancer~
and neoplasms of the lymphatic and hematopoietic elesv howaet leveatd ed
SMR's Within this latter group the category other neoplasms |.
lymphoid tissue polycythemia vera and myelofibrosis had a statistically
i
elevation significant threefold
in the SMR
.
Among retired men several site specific cancershad elevated
mortality ratios
Interestingly
while
our
earlier
mortality
7
study
showed fewer deaths than expected due to cancer of the respiratory
system
for
both
active
employees
and
retirees
this study
a
shows
s,,>a-
tistically significant elevation for lung canceramong retirees
Table 4 presents mortality ratios for certain selected diseases of
the circulatory system for males from all plants combined In all cases
fewer deaths were observed than expected among those in the active age
range Among retirees the number of observed deaths was quite close to
what was expected
JACKSON 025939
.25
In this report the results of the cause specific mortality for all
plants combined and for individual plants were presented primarily for
large disease groups and for a limited number of smaller groups or
individual causes of death Additional analyses for other plant combi- combi- combi-
nations and for other diseases may be included in future reports
Tables 11 through 13 present a comparison of combined plant death :
rates with U.S. death rates for each five year age group for total
aan deaths total neoplasms and for total circulatory disease These rates
|
are expressed as the number of deaths per 1000 population
The discussion which follows is by no means intendetdo beexhaustive but highlights soom f te he more noteworthy findings in these tables
.
Table 2 presents the observed and expected numbers of deaths and
the corresponding SMR's SMR's for males for major disease groups The SMR - for
all causes combined for men age 15-64 is 73 which represents a statistically
significant deficit of deaths This is usually usually explained by what is
known the healthy worker effect 6 In other words the fact .
that the study population is composed of people who are healthy enough to be working while the comparison population in additt o i heao ltn hy
workers includes the disabled the institutionalized and others in ill
health means that the study population should compare favorably to the
comparison population A high SMR then becomes all the more noteworthy
Statistically significant deficits also appear in the same age group for
,
circulatory diseases respiratory diseases accidents poisonings and
violence and digestive diseases Two disease groups have statistically
. significant elevations in their SMR's among the retirees These are for .
neoplasms and for symptoms and defined conditions The SMR for this
last group is artificially infsl inca e st omee knd own deaths for which we ce
JACKSON 025940
|
27
Because of the small number of deaths among females the tables for 7
females show much less detail than those for males Table 5 which is
for all plants combined has one SMR which is statistically significant
That one is for accidents poisonings and violence among the active
aged women This is particularly noteworthy since five of the seven
deaths in this group were suicides These deaths were not restricted to
a
any specific plant It is interesting that the SMR for total deaths
ICDA 000-999 does not follow the same pattern among women as it did
among men that is with a low SMR for those aged 15-64 and an elevated .
. SMR for those aged 65-84 65-84 _ Instead for women the two SMR's are quite
similar The SMR's for the same two age groups for circulatory disease
are likewise quite similar to each other Neoplasms however , show
what is a more typical pattern among men The elevated SMR for neoplasms
among retirees appears to be consistent for several specific neoplasms -
as shown in Table 6 specifically digestive cancer breast cancer and | |
genitourinary cancer
Although the SMR of 221 for cerebrovascular disease in Table 7
/ among those people over 85 years of age is statistically significant it
. may not be very meaningful because of the unreliability of diagnoses for
people of that age Yet this is something which should be kept in mind
when
future studies are done Consistent results over several years are
|
Te
likelyto be meaningful wg
:
As mentioned above Tab8laends9 give plant specific SMR's for
males for select causes of death To illustrate the earlier mentioned 7
reference to the masking effect when large heterogeneous populations are
studied notice that although the SMR of 106 for all causes among retirees -
is not particularly noteworthy some individual plants do show SMR's
that are quite high
BATO JACKSON 025941
'. 28
Two plants show statistically significant deficits of deaths in the
age span 15-64 for total deaths ICDA 000-999 Plant 8 has an SMR of
46 while plant 18 has an SMR of 57. For plant 18 this deficit also
. shows up for circulatory disease in the same age group with an SMR of
46. Although the SMR for neoplasms in age group 65-84 at this plant
is only 112 the SMR for lung cancer ICDA 162 as seen in Table is
oan
.
7
186 whicihs statistically significant a
,
Plant 10 shows a statistically significant elevation among those
age 65-84 for deaths due to neoplasms with an SMR of 222. Plant 33 had
three times number of total
SMR of 302 was not attributable
deaths to any
expected
specific
among the retired This
|
cause however The
elevation due to circulatory disease in plant 36 SMR of 208 is largely
due to cerebrovascular disease notice the SMR of 452 in Table 9 al-
though deaths due to ischemic heart disease were also elevated This
particular plant is being investigated further because 82 percent of all
deaths in the plant were due to circulatory disease The SMR of 186 for
neoplasms among retirees at plant 41 is statistically significant
Similarly Table 9 shows an elevateSMdR of 226 for lung cancer in the .
same age group for this plant Plant 47 has consistently high SMR's for
myocardial infarction for both age groups 15-64 and 65-84 Boot f th he
SMR's 283 and 231 are statistically significant Plant 48 has three
|
SMR's for the age group 65-84 which are statistically significant
These are
for total
deaths
SMR =
132 neoplasms
=
SMR
172
and
myocardial infarctSiMoRn= 198 Although the SMR of 240 for cir-
culatory disease among those people over 85 yearosf age is statistically a
e
7 significant as mentioned above this is something to be watched in
future studiebust it may not be important because of diagnostic unre- a
JACKSON 025942
liability Only five plants had enough female deaths to report plant
specific SMR's These are shown in Table 10. Although not statisti-
cally significant the elevated SMR's for total deaths in the 15-64 year
old age group in plants 18 and 39 the SMR of 132 for total deaths among
retirees at plant 26 and the SMR of 153 for neoplasms among retirees in plant 32 should be noted and checked for consistenciyn later studies
Although SMR's were not reported when there were fewer than five
observed deaths yet each SMR was examined and tested for statistical
significance Statistically significant elevations in SMR's with fewer
than five deaths appear in Tables 8 through 10 as *** In each of
these cases there
appear in Table 9
was
for
more
lung
than one death but less
cancer among actives at
than five These
plant 33 and in Table
10 for all causes and circulatory diseases among retir atepe las nt 8 and
|
for neoplasms among retirees at plant 26. Although these are based on
few deaths they should be noted for further observation
As can be seen in Table 11 the death rates for all causes combined
is lower in the rubber industry than in the U.S. population for all ages
up through age 64 although the differences are not statistically sig-
nificant through age 49. After age 65 the rubber industry rates are
higher than the U.S. rates for some age groups and lower for others
The comparison of the rateisn Table for circulatory diseases does
not show any pattern with the rubber industry having higher rates than the U.S. for some age groups and lower rates for others Table 13
which is for neoplasms shows a statistically significant difference in
the rates for age group 70-74 In this case the rubber industry has a
higher death rate than the U.S. population
JACKSON 025943
IV SUMMARY AND CONCLUSION
The principal purpose of the 1977 Mortality Study has been to
demonstrate the feasibility of conducting a mortality study on an annual
basis as part of a health surveillance system and at the same time to
report on that study within a reasonable amount of time This has been accomplished Some of the problems encountered in this first study of
_ this type such as obtaining race data will be avoided in subsequent
studies because the data will not need to be collected again for the
vast majority of the population
As mentioned before the importance of an annual mortality study
increases as time goes by because it provides valuable data for comparison
and for observing trendosr changes in the health of working populations
over time The function of studies such as thiiss to indicate what
plants and disease groups particularly need further investigation with
the ultimate goal being to recommend actions which remove hazards to the
|
health of workers
.
A final report on
which will include all
this study will be prepared by the end of 1978
48 plants as well as further analyses of the 42
plants included here Additional checks will be made on the quality of
the data presented here for example checking for additional death
certificates checking on the correct identification of people for whom
we have death certificates but who are not part of this report and
checking the accuracy of the nosology coding although samples of records
checked in the past have indicated a high degree of accuracy As men-
tioned earlier this study is in reality made up of two separate popula-
tions actives and retirees All 1977 actives regardless of how long
JACKSON 025944
31
they worked in a plant were included in the study Because a minimum
'
length of service is required for retirement the retirees all had to
have at least ten years of service in a plant This gives the two
groups quite different exposure characteristics For this reason we
hope to continue the analysis of this data by looking at actives and
retirees separately This report separated on age prior to 65 and 65+
which approximates the retiree separatiobunt because many
people retire prior to reaching age 65 this is not as precise as we
would like
Other analyses planned for the next report will include length of
service and race neither of these variabebinl g reeas dy for use at this
time We also plan to group plants according to products to see if
there are problems which common to plants of one type Individual company analyses will be done for the next report as well The final
report on this study will also include analyses using other methods of
standardizing for age Instead of using only the U.S. population for
comparison populations based on smaller geographical areas mabye used
and the total rubber industrmayy be use asda comparison for specific
companies or plants
JACKSON 025945
32
REFERENCES
U.S. Bureau of the Census Current Population Reports Series 25 No. 614 Estimates of the Population of the United States by Age Sex and Race 1970 to 1975 U.S. Government Printing Office Washington D.C. 1975
A description of the data available on computer tapes is available |
from the U.S. Government Printing Office in a publicatieonn-
titled Standardized Micro Tape Transcripts |
National Center for Health Statistics Eighth Revision Inter-
national Classification of Diseases Adapted for Use in the
-
United States U.S. Government Printing Office Washington D.C.
Mancuso TF Ciocco A Attar AA An epidemiological approach to
the rubber industry JOM 213-232 1968
.
Andjelkovich D Taulbee J Symons M Williams T Rubber Workers with Reference to Work Experience 405 1977
Mortality of|
JOM 397-
McMichael AJ Standardized
Worker Effect Scratching 168 1976
Mortality Ratios and the Healthy
Beneath the Sur.fJOa M 1c 65e -
McMichael AJ Andjelkovich DA Tyroler HA Cancer Mortality Among Rubber Workers An Epidemiologic Study Ann New York Acad Sci 125-137 1976 .
JACKSON 025946
'
TABLES
NOTE
In Tables 2-7 which follow the number of observed and
expected deaths for all causes all neoplasms and all circulatory which appears at the bottom of each | table may not equal the sum of the observed and expected
deaths for the individual diseases listed in the table
This is because the disease groups are not always
exclusive and because the bottom line may include
diseases than are listed in the tables
mutually
more
JACKSON 025947
34
wy
TABLE 1
Distribution of Population and Deaths by Age and Sex
Age
Males
Population
Females . Total
Males
Deaths
Females
- Total
15-19
510
87
1597
0
20-24
5433
640
6073
10
25-29
8148
725
8873
30-34
7989
8734
8
35-39 5844 | 684 6528 8
1
1
1
11
0
9
1
9
1
40-44
4440
581
5021
11
1
12
45-49
4414
710
5124
24
1
25
50-54
5765
1006
6771
33
5
38
55-59
6182
1479
7661
74
10
84
60-64
5871
1544
7415
119
14
133
65-69
4697
1367
6064
180
23
203
70-74
|
75-79
80-84
|
85+
3674 2482 1487
704
1108 669 375 136
4782 3151 1862
840
217
183 158
94
29
246
26
209
19
177
17
111
Total | 67640
11856
79496
1128
1277
JACKSON 025948
TABLE
TABLE 2
OBSERVED AND EXPECTED DEATHASND SMR's FOR MAJOR DISEASE CATEGORIES
AMONG MALES FOR ALL PLANTS COMBINED
Cause of Death
Circulatory Diseases Neoplasms Respiratory Diseases Accidents Poisonings Violence
Digestive Diseases
Endocrine Nutritional Diseases~
Symptoms defined Conditions Nervous System Diseases Genitourinary Diseases
Infective Diseases
Blood forming Organ Diseases Congenital Anomalies
Mental Disorders Skeletal Diseases
All Causes Combined
ICDA Codes
390-458
140-239
460-519 800-999
520-577
240-279 780-796 320-389 580-629 000-139 280-289 740-759 290-315 710-738
Observed 15-64 65-84
Expected
85+ | 15-64 65-84
85+
137
74
8
42 13
5
6 5 3 0 1 1 1
0
411 58
175
57 842NOH120
18 842NOHO120
26 =. 842NOH120
17
842NOH120
15 842NOH120
5652OH
842NOH120
5652OH 842NOH120
|
5652OH
842NOH120
5652OH
842NOH120
5652OH . 8422NOHO1220
5652OH 842NOHO120
5652OH . 842NOH120
174.80 89.27 19.65 65.49 24.23 6.88 7.82 3.80 3.53 3.28
0.86
0.93
4.59
0.78
401.65 147.56
57.88
20.15 20.15 13.05
8.05 4.63 10.59 4.69
.1.56
0.31 1.99 1.10
67.10 11.23
8.38 2.44 2.07 1.59 1.27 0.32 2:28
0.58
0.26 0.03 0.25
0.13
SMR'S 15-64 65-84 85+
** 83 41 ** 54 73 77 132
--
---
--
--
--
102
119 98 89
129 130 186 108
57 107
-~
86 116
95
--
-Sate
-
~
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
000-999
296 738 94 406.15 693.97 98.01 98.01 ** 106 96
|
Note
.
The SMR's for Symptoms and defined cates for known deaths are included in
and the deaths reclassified to another
Conditions are artificially inflated because missing death certifithis category temporarily death certificates can be obtained
disease category
;
= Statistically significant at the 0.05 level of significance
** Statistically significant at the 0.01 level of significance
|
JACKSON 025949
TABLE 3
OBSERVED AND EXPECTED DEATHS AND SMR's FOR NEOPLASMS AMONG MALES FOR ALL PLANTS COMBINED
;
;
Cause of Death
ICDA Codes
Observed 15-64 65-84
Expected 85+ | 15-64 65-84
-
85+
Buccal Cavity Pharynx Digestive Organs Peritoneum
'
Esophagus
Stomach
Large Intestine
. Rectum
Liver Pancreas
Peritoneum Unspecified Digestive Respiratory System
Larynx Trachea Bronchus Lung Other Unspecified Respiratory Bone Skin Breast Genitourinary Organs
Prostate
Bladder
Other Unspecified Urinary Other Unspecified Sites
Brain Nervous System Lymphatic Hematopoietic
Lymphosarcoma
Multiple Myeloma ,
Leukemia
Lymphatic Leukemia Myeloid Leukemia
Monocytic Leukemia
Other Lymphoid Polycythemia Vera Myelofibrosis
Benign Neoplasms
Unspecified Neoplasms
'
All Neoplasms
140-149
150-159 150
151
153
154
155
157
158 159
160-163 161 162
163 170-174
180-189
185
188
189
190-199
|
191-192
200-209
200
;
203
204-207 204
205
206
!
|
202,8,9
~
210-228
230-239
140-239
1
5 1
3.27 3.41 0.23
18
48 5 21.52 41.14 3.44
3
4 1
2.88 . 3.34 0.19
5
8
ONHOOH
3.51 7.03 0.68 0.68
6
19
ONHOOH
6.79 15.11 1.35
2
OH724610-2
ONHO OH
1.97 4.31 0.45
0
OH7246210-2
ONHOOH
0.79 1.10 0.05
2
OH724610-2
ONHOOH
4.61 8.21 0.53
0
OH724610-2 ONHO H
0.20 0.25 0.01
0
OH724610-2
ONHOOOH
0.11
0.29 0.04
27
OH7246210-22 NONO 35.39 46.65 1.62
.
0
NONO
1.48 1.84 0.08
25
OH7246210-22 NONO 33.41 44.23 1.50
2
OH7246210-2
NONO
0.28 0.34 0.01
2
OH7246210-2 OH
2.72 2.53 0.29
6
OH7246210-22 OH
7.60 28.54 3.64
4
OH7246210-22 HO
2.94 19.37 2.73
1
9 HO
1.71 6.01 0.72
1
4
ONQOHOH
2.31 2.88 0.16
8
11
ONQOHOH
9.17 11.61 0.82
2
1 .0 3.05 1.82 0.03
11
9
ONQOHOH
8.42 12.28 1.05
2
-0
ONQOHOH
1.63 1.92 0.12
2
1 ONQNOHHOHO 1.19 2.22 0.15
2
7 ONQOHOH
3.11 5.37 0.60
1
3 ONQOHOH
0.71 1.72 0.25
ane)
4 ONQOHOH
1.70 2.27 0.21
1
0 ONQOHOH
0.08 0.19 0.02
a
4 ;
5
1125
0
1.48 2.21 0.16
1125 0
1
1 25 . 0
74 175 13
0.40
0.79
|
89.27
0.41 0.04
0.97 - 0.11
147.56 11.23
* u Statistically significant at the 0.05 level of significance
***== Statistically significant at the 0.01 level of significance
1
wa
ow
i woot
SMR's 15-64 65-84 85+
12128
12128
12128
142 88
-----
76
--
75
---
79
--=
- 87
--
131
-------
147
--
145
--
--
114
~~
126
--
139
--
ee
85
--
-~ -~
=
--
141
--
--
145
--
---
-~
--
112 98
150
--
--
--
=~
-
-
95
--
73
--
-ae G --
--
130
}
--
|
--
|
~-
338
---
83
----
119
1 12 1
116
36
JACKSON 025950
TABLE 4
OBSERVED AND EXPECTED DEATHS AND SMR's FOR CIRCULATORY DISEASE
AMONG MALES FOR ALL PLANTS COMBINED
;
Cause of Death
Chronic Rheumatic Heart Disease
Hypertensive Disease
Ischemic Heart Disease
Acute Myocardial Infarction
Cerebrovascular Disease
All Circulatory Diseases
ICDA Codes
Observed
Expected
15-64 65-84 85+ | 15-64 65-84 85+
SMR's 15-64 65-84 85+
393-398
400-404
3 20
1
5 1
3.10 3.46 0.20 --
Tose
--
2.29 5.77 1.25
87
--
410-413
410 430-438
103 294 41 131.38 274.36 41.64 78 107 98
62 152 12
14
70 10
87.98 148.48 14.34 ** 102 84
18.17 71.15 14.79 77
98
68
390-458
137 411 58 174.80 401.65 67.10 ** 102 86
* = Statistically significant at the 0.05 level of significance
** = Statistically significant at the 0.01 level of significance
37 37
JACKSON 025951
TABLE 5
OBSERVED AND EXPECTED DEATHS AND SMR's FOR MAJOR DISEASE CATEGORIES
AMONG FEMALES FOR ALL PLANTS COMBINED
Cause of Death
Circulatory Diseases
Neoplasms
Respiratory Diseases Accidents Violence etc. Digestive Diseases Endocrine Nutritional Diseases Symptoms defined Conditions Nervous System Diseases Genitourinary Diseases
Infective Diseases
Blood forming Organs Congenital Anomalies Mental Disorders
Musculoskeletal Diseases
Complications of Pregnancy
All Causes
ICDA Codes
Observed
Expected
15-64 65-84 85+ | 15-64 65-84 85+
. SMR's 15-64 65-84
390-458
140-239
460-519 800-999 520-577 240-279 780-796 320-389 580-629 000-139 280-289 740-759 290-315
710-738 630-678
11
53 12
15.60 67.68 10.85
71
78
10 27 2 15.08 22,42 | 1.17 66 120 |
3
3 1
1.91
5.05
0.82
--
-
7
3
Qa
3.02
2.52 0.30 232
--
2
2
0
2.55 3.21 0.31
-
--
1
2
0
1.39
3.95
0.29
-
~-
1
3 0
0.68
1.17
0.18
=
-
e)
0 Q
-
_
-~-
~-
~~
0
NHOHOO
1
0.57
1.64
0.20 | --
~~
@)
NHOHOO
0
0.41
0.72
0.07
--
=~
0
NHOHOO
0)
-~-
-~
--
--
6
NHOHOO
0
0.12
0.08
0.00
-
--
0
NHOHOO
0
--
--
--
--
0
NHOHO O
1
0.25
0.42
0.02
--
~-
0
NHOHOO
0
--
--
--
--
-~
.
85+ 111
-_
---a --_ --
_ ---
-
000-999
35
97 17
82
88
118
* = Statistically significant at the 0.05 leveolf significance
38
ro
+
JACKSON 025952
TABLE 6
OBSERVED AND EXPECTED DEATHS AND SMR's FOR NEOPLASMS ~ : AMONG FEMALES FOR ALL PLANTS COMBINED
Cause of Death
Digestive Organs Peritoneum
Esophagus
Stomach
|
Large Intestine
Rectum
Gallbladder
Pancreas
Respiratory System Trachea Bronchus Lung
Bone Skin Breast
Breast
Genitourinary Organs Genital Organs
Cervic Uteri
Ovary Fallopian Tube Other Unspecified Urinary
Other Unspecified Sites|
; Brain Nervous System
Lymphatic Hematopoietic
Lymphosarcoma
Multiple Myeloma . Other Lymphoid Polycythemia Vera
"
Myelofibrosis Benign Neoplasms
ICDA Codes
Observed
Expected '
15-64 64-84 85+ | 15-64 65-84 85+
SMR's
15-64 15-64 65-84 85+
150-159
HO OHMA
9
0
3.20
7.39
0.46
--
122
--
- 150
151 153
154 156
HO OHMA
1
0)
0.18
0.24
0.02
--
--
--
HO OHMA
1
0
0.37 0.93 0.07 --
-~
-~
HO OHMA
4
O 1.39 3.35 0.22 --
=~
-
~
HOOHMA 1
- 0
0.30 0.67 0.05
--
~
--
~-
HO OHMA
1
0
0.16
0.47
0.02
-~
_
a
| 157
HO OHMA
1
0
0.65
1.45
0.07
--
-~
-~
160-163 162
HO OHMA
0
1
2.35
2.29
0.07
--
--
-~
HO OHMA
0
H HO
2.25
2.18
0.07
--
--
--
170-174
HO OHMA
6
HHHO
3.84
3.96
0.20
--
152
--
| 174
HO OHMA
6
HHHO
3.53
3.56
0.16
--
169
~-
180-189 180-184
0
Q5A
HHHO 2.63 3.69 0.17
136
ated
DOONHO
4
O
2.29 2.83
0.12
-
--
--
180
DOONHO
1
O
0.62
0.53
0.02
--
~~
--
183
DOONHO
IMHOMAL
O
1.15 1.28 0.05 --
--
--
189
DOONHO
IMHOOMAL
O
0.21 0.41 0.02 -~
--
--
190-199 | 191-192
DOONHO
3
O
1.47
2.39
0.13
--
--
--
DOONHO
0
O 0.43 0.36 0.00 --
--
--
200-209
DOONHO
3
O
1.12
2.13
0.10
--
--
-~
: 200
203
DOONHO
IMHOMAL
O
0.23
0.38
0.02
~~
--
Seed
O
1
O
0.20
0.41
0.02
--
--
<
:
:
202,8-9 202,8-9
210-228
Q
1 0
.0.19 0.46 0.02 | |
||
|
0
1 0 0.08 0.10 0.00 |
|
|
All Neoplasms
140-239
10
27
2 15.08 22.42 1.17 66 120 -~
39
JACKSON 025953
TABLE 7
OBSERVED AND EXPECTED DEATHS AND SMR's FOR CIRCULATORY DISEASE
AMONG FEMALES FOR ALL PLANTS COMBINED
Cause of Death
Chronic Rheumatic Heart Disease Hypertensive Disease
Ischemic Heart Disease
Acute Myocardial Infarction
:
Cerebrovascular Disease
All Circulatory Diseases
ICDA Codes
Observed
Expected
SMR's
15-64 65-84 85+ 15-64 65-84 85+ | 15-64 65-84 85+
393-398
400-404 410-413
.410 430-438
106
02320
0
0.62
1.00
0.05
11211
--
106
02320
0
0.36 1.38
0.22
11211
--
Sted
106
35
5
9.31 42.28 6.40 64
83 78
3
02320
1
5.64 20.23
1.86
11211
109
--
3
10
6
3.10 15.61 2.72
11211
64 221
390-458
12
53 12 15.60 67.68 10.85 77
78 111
* = Statistically significant at the 0.05 level of significance
40
ao 1
vr
JACKSON 025954
41
TABLE8
SMR'S BY PLANT FOR MALES FOR SELECTED MAJOR DISEASE CATEGORIES
All Causes
Circulatory
Neoplasms
Accidents
:
000-999
390-458
140-239
800-999
.
| | | | Plant
15-64 65-84 85+
15-64 65-84 85+
15-64 65-84 85+
15-64 65-84 85+
,
1
72
109
--
95
93 0 --
-
122
-- Joo
-
2
--
--
--
-
=
-~
-
--
-
=
3
101
--
oe
--
soo
--
oo
--
4
5 6 3.7 8 9 10 11 12
76
~~
46
--.
139
-
100
--
=
wwe
wl
118
--
79
0
=
91
190
-=-+
oe
-~~ a a
77
--
151
~a
.98
==
ania
~
a
104
=
mee
-
-
=
a
oe
--
mae
~
Pore
==
a
~~
_
wee
~--
222
--
oo
a
=
== ==
~~
oe
---
_
-~
-a ~ -_-
oe -
_
---
_ oe
ae
= =
--
* :
13 14 15
. _ ~~
-
~e
=
_ ~-
1112111
~ -~
-
_
=
--
_
_
~
-
-
16 -
--
~-
oo
--
1112111
--
-
--
mats
-
.
17
-
aan
1112111
-
a
-~
-
a
18 19
**
a
101
~-
109
--
**
--
1112111
98
1112111
97
ae-
112 . 109
--
---
=
a
20
-~
=
--
1112111
--
--
=
--
aoe
21
94
--
=n
--
1112111
=
--
--
=e
--
--
=
22
~~
-Q
=
--
-
oa
--
-
-
-
.
23
79
71 178
--
70
--
-
--
=
_
-
-
=
24
73
135
=
--
114
==
166
130
-~
--
-
=
.
25
--
wee
-
eee
-~
-
=
--
_
26 27 28
108
_
_~
~~
--
== =
130
__ --
145
_
=
-
=
-PTO
a-
oe
_
_
-
=
--
a
--
moe
--
-_
-
F 29 --
-
=
--
--
=
--
--
--
=
30
~~
~~
=
~
--
=
--
--
=
-~
-
is
:
31
--
=
--
-
=-
-
-
=
~~
=
32 107 91 145 95 -
=
--
-
_~
--
+
33
--
302
-
-~
-
-
=
--
-
=
--
-
-
=
34
--
=
--
~~
-
o-
--
-
=
35
--
--
=
--
-
=
36 37
2168121
2168121
139
-
~
=
-_
208
~
-
=
--~
--
=
--
+e
--
=
Oo
38
2168121
-
=
-~
-
=
--
--
=
-
-
=
39 40
2168121
2168121
81
-
-=
---
69
=
=
---
96
--
---
---
-
=
=
41 42
2168121
2168121
117
-
as
56
82
--
--
213
213
186
-
--
181
-~
_-
-
a
43 44
45
2168121
2168121 --
107
86
~
Oo
64
--
--
102
--
77
= =
213
-- 0
--
106
~-
ee
--
ose
: 46
~-
-
a=
-
-
-
Bt
n
All
47 48 Plants
100
86
**
130
132
106
--
165 96
| 159
90
78
129 138 102
==
240 |
86
-==
83
=~
=
172 --
119 116
* = Statistically significant at the 0.05 level of significance
** Statistically significant at the 0.01 level of significance
-~
188
--
--oo
--
--
211 **
-
os
nae
a~
a
=
a
89 =
JACKSON 025955
TABLE 9
SMR'S BY PLANT FOR MALES FOR SELECTED Causes of dEATH
42
+
Plant
Acute Myocardial
| 15-64
105
410
65-84 73
Infarc 85+
Cerebrovascular Disease
430-438)
15-64 65-84
85+
Cancer Trachea Bronchus
15-64
162
65-84
85+
Lung
113
~~
--
102
--
96
--
87
--
186
~
--
452
73
87
--
127
---
226
--
127
283
231 **
_-
198
--
112
--
145
--
at)
All Plants
70
102
84
77
98. 68|
75
145
* Statistically significant at the 0.05 level of significance.
**
** = Statistically significant at the 0.01 level of significance
*** *** ***
Statistically significant at the 0.05 level of significance SMR not reported
because of less than five deaths
JACKSON 025956
TABLE 10 | -
.
SMR'S BY PLANT FOR FEMALES FOR SELECTED MAJOR DISEASE CATEGORIES
43
All Causes 000-999
Plant | 15-64
165-84
85+
Circulatory 390-458
15-64
65-84
85+
Neoplasms 140-239
15-64
65-84
85+
Accidents 800-999
15-64 64-85 85+
ey
toa All
Plants
82
88
118
71
78
111
***
level Statistically significant at the 0.05
of
. of less than five deaths
*
Statistically significant at the 0.05 level of
66 120
232
significance SMR not reported
significance
--
oe
because
-
JACKSON 025957
TABLE 11
COMPARISON OF MORTALITY RATES BETWEEN RUBBER INDUSTRY
ALL PLANTS COMBINED AND U.S. POPULATION FOR ALL CAUSES
OF DEATH AMONG MALES
Age
Study Population
Person
No. of .
Years
Deaths
15-19
20-24
426.1 4849.9
25-29
7608.7
30-34
7429.6
35-39
5357.8
40-44 | .4278.9
45-49
4398.5
50-54
5824.1
55-59
6065.4
60-64
5712.8
65-69
4507.3
70-74
3433.5
75-79
2299.4
80-84
1287.0
85+
557.7
.0 10
9 8
8
11 24 33 74 119 180 217 183 158 94
Deaths Per 1000 Population .
'
Rubber Mortality
U.S. Mortality
Kate
Rate
0 2.062 1.183 1.077 1.493 2.571 5.456 5.666 12.200
20,830
39.935 63.201 79.586 122.766
168.549
1.473 2.094 1.999 2.058 2.765 4.191 6.670 10.439 ** 16.151 *
25.216*
36.373 55.602 82.589 115.933 175.726
44
Note Calculation of person is explaineidn the appendix
*
Statistically significant difference at the 0.05 level of significance-
**
**
Statistically significant at difference the 0.01 level of significance-
JACKSON 025958
45
TABLE 12
COMPARISON OF MORTALITY RATES BETWEEN RUBBER INDUSTRY ALL PLANTS COMBINED AND U.S. POPULATION
FOR ALL CIRCULATORY DEATHS AMONG MALES
Age
15-19
20-24
25-29 30-34
35-39 40-44 45-49 50-54 55-59 60-64 65-69 70-74 75-79 80-84
|
85+
Study Population
Person
No. of
Years
Deaths
426.1 4849.9 7608.7
7429.6
5357.8
4278.9
4398.5
5824.1 6065.4 5712.8 4507.3 3433.5 2299.4 1287.0
557.7
0 1 1 2
2 15 14 40 61 90 115 108
98 58
Deaths Per 1000
Rubber Mortality ~
Rate
Population
U.S. Mortality Rate
0 0.206
0.131 .
0.269
. 0.187 0.467
- 3.410 2.403 6.595
10.678 19.968
33.494
46.969
76.146 -
103.999
0.043
0.066 0.117 0.244 0.623 1.422 2.746 4.830 ** . 7.971 12.916 19.432 31.223 ... 48.987
73.204
120.295
Note Calculation of person years is explaineidn the appendix ** = Statistically significant difference at the 0.01 level of significance
JACKSON 025959
46
TABLE 13
COMPARISON OF MORTALITY RATES BETWEEN RUBBER INDUSTRY
;
ALL PLANTS COMBINED AND U.S. POPULATION
FOR ALL NEOPLASMS AMONG MALES
Age
Study Population
Person
No. of
Years
Deaths
15-19 -
426.1
20-24
|
25-29
4849.9 7608.7 -
30-34
7429.6
35-39
5357.8
40-44
4278.9
45-49
4398.5
50-54
|. 5824.1
55-59
6065.4
60-64
5712.8
65-69
4507.3
70-74
3433.5
75-79
2299.4
80-84
85+
1287.0 557.7
0 1 1
0
1 4 6 10 18 33 50 60 36 29 13
Deaths Per 1000
Rubber Mortality
Rate
Population U.S. Mortality
Rate
0 0.206 0.131
0 0.187 0.935 1.364 1.717 2.968 5.777 8.752 17.475 15.656 22.533 23.310
0.074 0.096 0.130
0.188'
0.323 0.655 1.356
2.437:
4.055 6.493
9.112
12.834 * 16.408 19.183
20.124.
Note Calculation of person is explained in the appendix * = Statistically significant difference at the 0.05 level of significance
-
JACKSON 025960
FIRESTONE
Akron Albany
Bloomington
Decatur
Des Moines
Los Angeles
ete
Memphis
Noblesville
Pottstown
Russellville Ruselvile
Russellville Russellville
SaSlianalsinas
GENERAL Akron
Mayfield
Waco .
GOODYEAR
.
Akron
Conshohocken
Cumberland
Danville
Freeport Gadsden
Jackson
Lincoln
Los Angeles
'
Madisonville
Marysville
New Bedford
North Chicago
GS
St. Mary's
2
Sun Prairie
. Topeka
47
APPENDIX I LIST OF INDIVIDUAL PLANTS
GOODYEAR continued Tyler Union City
Windsor
UNIROYAL
.
Chicago =-.
:
Chicope
_ Chicopee ......
Detroit
Detroit
;
Claire
Eau Claire
Los Angeles
Masland
7
Mishawaka
Naugatuck Chem & Syn
Naugatuck Footwear
'
. Opelika.
Painesville
Port Clinton Coated Fabrics
Port Clinton Industrial Products
;
Scotts
Bluff
Washington
JACKSON 025961
APPENDIX II
DIAGRAM 1 TYPES OF EMPLOYEES INCLUDED IN THE STUDY POPULATION
Employment Status as of
December 31 1977
+
Jan. 1 1977
| | | | | |. | | | |
+
Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sept Oct Nov Dec. 31 1977
Active hired before Jan. 1 1977
Active hired during 1977
Sick leave
Military or Educational leave
Other leaves
off
Transfer to salary
Quit discharged Retired prior to 1977
normal early disability
Retired during 1977
early normal disability
deferred vested
Termination Award
Deceased during 1977
| ; ~
date of hire
|
|
|
z
|
|
|
4 date of exit
dateof off
date of off + 90 days
date of transfer
| date of exit
|
;
.
ve
date of - retirement
:
| date of exit i date of exit
| date of death
Employees who 1 began a military or educational leave before 1/1/77 2 retired before 1/1/77 with deferred
vested benefits but received no benefits in 1977 3 received a termination award before
1/1/77 population 1/1/77 before
were not included in the 1977 Mortality Study
or 4 died
7? Zoe
:
a era
48
.
are
c
i
7
JACKSON 025962
-49
an
APPENDIX III
Data Analysis Program
2
Past mortality studies done at the OHSG have identified study
populations at given points of time and then have followed these pop-
ulations for a number of years usually ten This study has some
unique featuir n e ths at it is for only one year and people can enter the
study at different times and can leave the study as well Diagram 1 7
illustrates the categories of people who enter or leave during the year
1977.
Because of these differences from past studies a new computer |
|
program was written to analyze the data
Basic to a cohort mortality study is the population from which the
deaths occur The death rates in the comparison populatioarne applied
to this study population to determine the number of expected deaths
Yet when people enter and leave the study population it is difficult to
determine exactly how many people are in the study population at any one
time or even durinagn entire year Including people fora whole year who either entered or left during the year results in overestimating the
population and consequently overestimating the number of expected deaths
and underestimating the SMR An illustration may be helpful Suppose
that a person is hired on February 1 1977 and quits on June 1 1977
If he died after June 1 theries a good chance that we will never learn
of his death his death cannot be included in the study then neither
'
should he be included in the underlying study population
Yet if he
2
had died on May 25 1977 his death would be recorded on company files
we would learn of it and we would get a copy of the death certificate
It becomes clear then that he be should included in the study population
JACKSON 025963
. 50
for that portion of the year during which he worked and for which his
death will be recorded in company records or in other words for that
portion for which he qualifies for life insurance The concept of the
person year was used to account for the number of people in the study :
population Person years are the number of years in this case a
fraction of a year which a person contributes to the study population
The task of the computer program is to calculate for each person that fraction of a year that he contributes to the total person years of the population This is made more complex by virt ofute he fact that
-
expected deaths are calculated separately for each race group so
that the person years must be accumulated separately for each of these
groups. The program that was written at looks each individual record If a person was hired before January 1 1977 and was still working on
December 31 1977 the program adds one person year to the appropriate
ce
race category If however a person was hired during the year .
or left other than for retirement or leave of absence the program cal-
culates the fraction of the year he was eligible for life insuranacned .
that fraction of a person year is added to the appropriate group This
entire process is complicated further by the fact that each person a _
birthday during the year so that the person years of any individual may
be divided between two different age groups The end result is a popu-
lation which has been broken down into 60 different race groups
with the appropriate number of person years in each group
After the study population has been processed the expected number
of deaths can be calculated The number of deaths in each race
disease group in the comparison population are read into the computer
These numbers are divided by the corresponding race population .
ro
| ?
oa
7g
JACKSON 025964
51
figures to get the comparison population death rates These rates for
each disease group are multiplied by the study population
figures to get the number of expected deaths for each race
disease group There were 78 different disease groups studied for this report resulting in a total of 4680 possible disease groups
Finally the deaths in the study population are tabulated according
to the same race disease groups The SMR's can then be calculated
for any combination of these groups by summing the observed and expected
deaths across groups and then dividing the sum of the observed by the
sum of the expected
JACKSON 025965