Document rZKMybdL29XYVx6JqYO0gpB0
Quantitative risks of mesothelioma and lung cancer
Cohort identification
Process
Table 121 Summary of cohort (liba (part I )*
Fibre
Sex Average' Typical Predicted mortality Number
age at' follow for typical follow up of yean
first up" from avg. age lint latency
exposure
exposed*
Deaths by all causes
Mesothelioma deaths
Code
Name
lleferenee
Proportion Relative to age at fust exposure . of 30
Ohs Exp SMR Total 9k Excess number mortality
1 Whtenoom de Klerk et at. (1994)
M
o
m
29
35
0.24 1.08
10
719 601.8* 1.19
72*
12
2m
Carolina
Dement rt at. (1994)
T
y*
m
26
41
0.32 1.34
IS
607 410.1
1.48
2
0.49
(men)
2f Carolina (women)
T y*
r 26 41 0.32 1.34 15 362 299.2 1.21 0
0
J
Johns
Entcrline et at. (1987)
1 yao in 37 65
1
1
age>65 944
762J
1.24
8
1
hlanville
retirees
4
Ontario
Finkclstcin (I9K41
5a New Oilcans Hughes ci at. (I*>H7)
C y in
27 0.17 0.77 20
108 62.2 1.73
17
27
C yo* in 32 35 0.3 0.83 20 259 294.5 0.88 1 0.34
(plant 1)
5o New Orleans
c yo m 27 38 0.27 1.26 20 603 614.1 0.98 3 0.49
(plant 2)
b
Quebec
Liddell el at. (19971
7 Vocklahruck Neuhergcr and Kundi
M y in 23 72 1
1 age>55 6S87 5912.7* 1.11
33* 0.56
c
yo
inf
24
65
0.95 1.05
20
540 530.2*
--
5 0.94
(1990)
a US/Caiiada Seklntan and SctikufT
L yao* in
24
62
0.9
13)9
20
4626 3170.6
1.46
453
14
insulator* 0990)
9
Rochdale
Peto n at. (1983)
T yo* in 30 42 0.45 1
20 727 602.5* 1.21 10 1.7
10 Balangero Piolalto et at. (1990)
M y in 27 47 0.31 1.2 20 317 225.4 1.41 2 0.89
II
Pennsylvania McDonald et at. <l981a,b)
TF
ya*
ni
29
40
0J5
13)8'
20
895 821.1
1.09
14
1.7
12
Paterson
Seidman et </. (1986)
1 D in 37 40 0.6 0.63 5 593 355.9 1.67 17 4.8
IJa
SA amosite Sluis-Cremer et at. (1992)
M
a
m 31 40 0.4 0.93 0 648 456.3* 1.42 4 0.88
mines 1 Jo SA
M 1o
in 31 40 0.4 0.93 0 423 333.1* 1.27 20
6
crocidolilc
mines
14 Massachusetts Talcott ft at. (1989)
O 0 m 34 37 0.4 0.74 0 28 8.3 3.37 5 60
IS Alhin
Albin et at. (I990a.b)
16 Connecticut McDonald el at. (1984)
17
Ferodo
Newhouse and Sullivan
c yao* in 30 62 0.98 1
20 ' 592
493*
1.2
13 2.6
F
y*
in
31
40
0.41 0.93
20
557 . 550.7
1.01
0
0
F yo* tnf 30 45 0.56 1
10 2577 2646.3 0.97
13 0.49
(1989)
`Notes un starred entries in Table 14. "Follow up duration which divides the observation licld beyond the minimum latency into two equal areas.
*Sec text.
I*
j
!i
i