Document rBwrGZ65nqrDd86K8NrK0nrQ0
FILE NAME Reynolds Metals RM
DATE 1974 July 26
DOC RM012
DOCUMENT DESCRIPTION Confidential Memo - Industrial Hygiene Survey Results
wR
H. M. Cole - GOB
- - CONFIDENTIAL
:
.G
L.
Suffredini
-
Sherwin
_
.
JC
RECEIVED RECIVED
=
eee
eee
=o
a!
7"
July 25 1974
oe
mn
twee
ee
.
me
eee
INDUSTRIAL HYGIENE SURVEY
.
-
SHERWIN ALUMINA
PLANT
-
MARCH
24-29
1974
free Attached is the belated Industrial Hygiene Survey of
I apologize for this being late but I felt it
your plant
the the
plant institute certain changes prior to questionable silica problem which
appropriate that
its issuance Also
ambient air samples collected in bauxite
arose with regard to
took longer to resolve than
transfer operations
1
report
useful
and hope
that
expected I hope that you find this
I can be of further assistance to
at Sherwin Also I will send the information
you
appropriate review this
sampling equipment
report and can
after
you
have
on purchasing an opportunity
the to
take
see the direction that I feel we should
Again thank you very much
shown to me by the Sherwin
-
for your cooperation and the consideration
Plant Give my regards to all
,
Yours truly
HMC mfj mfj
ENCLOSURE
Th Th
H. M. Cole
wk
et
.
~~
CONF CONF
~
Oo
005192
t
TRACOMPANY TRACOMPANY CORRESPONDENCE
& Rev. 1-681
.
2 0O'M: H. M. Cole - GOB
CONFIDENTIAL CONFIDENTIAL
+ TO L. Suffredini - Sherwin -
OPY
ATE BJECT
C. Featherson S. C.
Ruth
Craig
Carson
H. R. Bratt M.D.
J.
Kinzey
R.N. R. M. Kibby
Christine Cline R.N. - Sherwin
R. B. Newman Drs MacMillan & ~ rby
J. A. Williams - EXO B.J.Sasser G^ B
July 26 1974
INDUSTRIAL HYGIENE SURVEY o
SHERWIN ALUMINA PLANT ~ MARCH 24
- 29
1974
At the request of plant management an Industrial Hygiene Survey was made of the Sherwin Alumina Plant March 24 - 29 1974 Following are the results of that survey
ITEM 1 -
Asbestos - Asbestos samples collected during the demo-
lition of insulating material from several reactor
vessels indicate compliance with present OSHA
guidelines See discussion
yw
4
:
DK
ITEM 2 -
Total Airborne Dust - Results of total airborne dust
samples collected in the bauxite transfer tunnels and
at alumina loading and unloading operations indicate
non compliance with OSHA regulations Although a good
respiratory protection program is in effect in most
much needs to be done with regard to the
areas
aspects of the problem
engineering
ITEM 3 -
.
ITEM 4 =
Solvent Vapors - Samples to determine solvent
collected in the
exposure
electrical shop at the motor dip tank
operatiaonnd while cleaning oil bulbs throughout the
plant indicate compliance with OSHA guidelines in all
areas tested
.
Sodium Hydroxide - Samples to determine caustic
were collected in the hydrate
filtration area
exposure
Fac 46
at the SOP filters Fac 35 on top of the percipitators
Fac 45 and in the recovery area Fac 230 Results
indicate compliance in all areas tested
.
ITEM 5 -
ITEM 6 -
Noise - Noise measurements were made in the
ment areas 110 and 111 on the Kiln Floor pcoawlecrindienpgart-
area and while scaling reactor vessels Results indicate that hearing protection is necessary and should be required in all scaling operations
Materials Screening Program - In order that the Medical
Department might better evaluate the hazard
of many chemicals used in
potential
become
our plant locations it
necessary for us to implement a materials
ing and evaluation program for
screen-
introduced
new chemicals as they are In order that we might achieve this
I will be in contact with the
purpose
plant in hopes of
Purchasing Agent at your
setting up a procedure to obtain this
information
a
...
~
005193
Sherwin Alumina Plant
Industrial Hygiene Survey
.-
July 26 1974
DISCUSSION
ITEM 1
Samples were collected for airborne asbestos while removing asbestos
insulation from several reactor vessels Results appear in Table 1
* Samples collected while removing asbestos insulation from reactor
-
vessels indicate compliance with the present OSHA guidelines
this to OSHA regulations require that you notify Mr. Enriquez in writing
within five days after receiving report that he was exposed
asbestos fibers in excess of permissible concentrations 10 fibers
per
of the cubic centimeter of air It is also required that Mr. Enriquez be
correct cori rev ctie ve action being taken to avoid future exposure
Mr. Enriquez as well as other employees involved in the demolition of
asbestos containing materials should also be provided with a
hensive medical examination as stated by Section 19.93 a j
Occupational Safety and Health Act It should be noted that
compre-
of the
all
corrective measures were instituted workers involved have been provided
immediately by the plant and all with thorough medical examinations
Also employees involved in the removal of asbestos during this sampling were wearing MSA Dustfoe 66 Respirators which have Bureau of Mines approval 21B for protection against asbestos
Thus this respirator afforded the workers involved with adequate respiratory protection during thesampling and demolition period However OSHA regulations having to do with the demolition of asbestos containing materials constitute a work practice standard requiring that a continuous flow or pressure demand type C supplied air respirators and special clothing be provided for employee engaged
in such operations In general it is felt that such operations are
quite dusty and result in the liberation of asbestos dust in concentrations several times the permissible exposure limits The plant has complied with these work practices and has instituted a comprehensive asbestos handling program I might also add that all spraying of asbestos insulations has been discontinued and substitutes
materials are presently being used and evaluated for performance
In the future we need to improve on our handling procedures and be sure that they are put into practice This requires an education
program on the part of everyone supervisors as well as hourly _workers Further monitoring is also needed to determine the ex-
posure parameters for individuals involved in other job classifi-
cations The following job categories need to be sampled
1 . Carpenters removing scaffolding after asbestos
demolition
005194
Sherwin Alumina Plant
Industrial Hygiene Survey
CONFIDENTIAL
3
July 26 1974
2
Iron workers welding studs onto digestor vessels in
preparation for new insulation
3 4 5
Employees or areas down wind insulation is being removed
from
where
asbestos
Employees involved in the installation of preformed asbestos pipe covering
Monitoring should also be accomplished on any Job category where an exposure exists which I
have overlooked
other
might
We need to monitor each of
determine our position and
these operations at to comply with OSHA
least yearly guidelines
yearly physicals would be in order for any other individual
of having asbestos exposures
to better
Also
suspected
ITEM 2
Total airborne Results appear
dust samples in Table 2
were
collected
throughout
.
the
plant
Samples for total airborne dust were collected for each job category
which involved either bauxite or alumina loading unloading or trans-
fer Samples were collected by the personal sampling technique as
set forth by NIOSH and OSHA in an attempt to better categorize employ-
ee exposure for each job classification Personal monitors were worn
by employees during their actual work Samplers were worn for
to
hours in an attempt to gain a representative sample
up Results are
reporteidn Table
cycle and as time
hours
2 as actual exposures obtained during the sampling weighted average exposures extrapolated to eight
Facilities 5 and 24 - Results of samples collected in the bauxite
unloading and
nuisance dust
transfer operations indicate compliance with
standards I realize that you have an effective
OSHA
res-
piratory protection program and employees were wearing approved Bureau of Mines respirators during my visit however this method of control of a hazard is considered a temporary means of control
In light of this fact we need to develop documentation that we we
this are looking into the feasibility of controlling this potential
problem
If process changes or work schedules were altered at any-
time in the past which relate to a
any-
lowering of dust exposures this
information should be extracted from past records and brought up to
date In addition any proposed engineering changes that might
bring about a similar reduction should also be documented In
general exposures of this nature up to 12 times the Value would result in a serious category citation
Threshold Limit The fact that
005005195 195
Sherwin Alumina Plant Industrial Hygiene Survey
CONFIDENTIAL
-4
July 26 1974
respirators are being worn would of course help but the outcome would depend on the judgement of the Industrial Hygienist involved Also I spoke with your Assistant Laboratory Director and he in-
dicated that the mean particle size of the airborne bauxite dust
was something in the order of 1-2 micons If this is in fact the
case the severity of the problem becomes much greater
- Also I had two air samples of airborne bauxite dust run for free
silica crystalline determinations These samples were processed by two outside independent laboratories and results indicate a
range of 0.4 - % free silica in total dust I have discussed
this possibility several people within the company and the
feeling is that anything above % free silica in Jamacian Bauxite
would be considered quite high As a result of these discussions
I would tend to question the reliability of results of greater than 1-2 free silica However it should be pointed out that
similar analysis from other independent parable results The analytical method silica is quite tedious and results are
labs might turn up comfor determining free
often scattered To
better determine our position in this matter I suggest that the plant periodically collect air samples by personal sampling method
and process them for free silica After we establish that we do not
in fact have a problem we then have available the information to
protect ourselves when such time comes
Also I think that the information collected here on our bauxite
handling operation is
to collect at a later
typical of information that date Therefore we should
we might expect
concern our-
selves with collecting only respirable samples in the future
This
procedure
will
allow us
to
separate
the respirable dust
from
the total dust exposure and information that will allow
hopefully provide us with
us to better determine the
additional
extent of
the problem if at all
of Facility 90 - Results samples collected in facility 90 involving
the unloading of alumina from railroad cars and the subsequent transfer and loading of this material into barges and other vessels in-
dicate compliance with OSHA guidelines There is no standard
at this point for Aluminum Oxide and it is therefore treated as a nuisance dust However more recent information implicates A1203 as having fibrogenic properties A recent updating of Aluminum In The Environment and Human Health University of Cincinnati incorporates several references on this subject In light of this material it would be appropriate for us to get our house in order
prior to new standards being developed In the future we should
sample this f^ cility routinely using respirable sampling equipment
to better determine the extent of the respiratory hazard associated
with this operation
-
.
.
005196
|
Sherwin Alumina Plant
Industrial Hygiene Survey
CONEIDENTIAL CONEIDENTIAL
;
.
5
July 26 1974
Also if there have been any process or administrative changes in this operation in the past or if engineering changes are planned that would reduce the above mentioned employee exposure then such information should be made available and appropriate records kept
Facility 51 - Alumina Loading Statements regarding the health related aspects of the Alumina exposure problem also apply to this facility however additional comments should be made regarding
this operation
It is my feeling that exposure to aluminum oxide at this operation is overly excessive and should not be allowed from a health or
safety point view I found it difficult to see much less to
walk such tion
on top of open hopper cars during my visit I might add that
an exposure would probably represent a serious category cita-
exposure 4-6 times OSHA standards can represent serious
violations
ITEM 3
Solvent Vapors - Results of solvent vapor samples collected in the
electrical shop and while cleaning oil bulbs in the Table 3. All measurements indicate compliance with
and should not pose any health related problem
field appear in OSHA regulations
ITEM 4
oe
Sodium Hydroxide - .Samples to determine collected throughout the plant Results
caustic exposure were appear in Tabel 4
Personal samples were collected throughout the plant to determine
sodium hydroxide exposure Samples were collected on fiber glass
filters wetted with deionized water and analyzed for both sodium
hydroxide
bined and
and all
sodium carbonate results appear as
Results of both analysis were sodium hydroxide Results are
com-
somewhat lower than expected but in light of a lack of clinical
manifestations of sodium hydroxide exposure the data appears in
order
ITEM 5
Noise - Noise suspected of a
measurements were taken
noise exposure problem
in all areas of Results appear
the plant in Table 5
Noise exposure determinations determidnatioens terminations
DuPont Audio DosimetDeosimetrers s DosimeDositmeteers rs whicwh hich
were made
integrate
throughout the plant
the workers exposure
using
over
the entire work shift shift shift Results indicate compliance in all areas
CONF
005197
. .
Sherwin Alumina Plant
Industrial Hygiene Survey
CONFIDENTIAL
CONFCOINFIDDENTEIALNTIAL
-6-
July 26 1974
tested except the scaling operations . It should be pointed out that scaler operators were wearing hearing protection during the sampling However it is difficult to determine the extent of
exposure for this job category in that different tanks will require varying times to complete a job Hearing protection should always be worn during this operation and employees should be
followed very closelbyy cur Medical Department to insure that
- employees hearing is being monitored Your plant has done an excellent job taking care of noise related exposures in the past and I'm sure that that performance will continue
S
ITEM 6
Materials Screening Program - The Medical Department is in the
process of dating its records concerning the raw materials used at each of our plant locations OSHA has been quite active in the past few years developing and setting standards for many
of these materials There have been occasions in the past where chemical substances have created considerable problem without
prior opportunity by the Medical Department to evaluate the hazard
potential As a result it has become necessary for us to re-
evaluate many of the materials in use and implement a materials
screening program for new chemicals as they are introduced In order that we might accomplish this purpose as well as eventually complying with OSHA I would like your support in collecting this
information
For example information that would be most helpful at your plant
would have to do with the different kinds of protective coatings
and their make up
~
.
In order that we might accomplish this purpose it is requested that each of your purchasing agents send out a copy of the enclosed letter with attached Material Safety Data Sheet in order that we might begin developing this list Whenever possible the
amount of material that is purchased for a given location should
be noted
In summary I would like to thank you for your help and the con-
sideration givetno me during my trip to Corpus If I can be of
any further help or answer any questions please don't hesitate
to call on me
Thank you
HMC mfj
Enclosures
Homer
Call
Homer M. Cole
005198
TABLE CONFIDENTIAL
SHERWIN ALUMINA PLANT
ASBESTOS SAMPLING STUDY
FEBRUARY 19 1974
SH
SH
Sample No. and
Description
;
W. Enriquez Service Repairman Knocking of asbestos from digester tank
1:30 pm - 1:42 pm
L. Cadriel Service Repairman Service Repair 1:30 pm - 1:42 pm
-SH SH SH SH
W. Enriquez Service Repairman Clean up of asbestos 1:45 pm - 1:59 pm
L. Cadriel Service Repairman Clean up of asbestos 1:45 pm - 1:59 pm
W. Enriquez Service Repairman Clean up 2:00 pm - 2:20 pm
L. Cadriel Clean up 2:00 pm - 2:20 pm
SH SH
W. Enriquez Service Repairman Clean up 2:40 pm - 2:50 pm
L. Cadriel Clean up )
:
2:40 pm - 2:50 pm
SH BLANK
Milliliter
of Air 0.92
3.18
10.25 _
~~
2.73
16.73
15.65
wre
3.31
1.50
# OSHA standard for asbestos fiber - 5 milliliter of air sampled eight weighted average or 10 milliliter ceiling value
So
005199
- TABLE 2
SHERWIN ALUMINA PLANT
TOTAL AIRBORNE DUST SAMPLING STUDY
MARCH 25-29 1974
Sample Number and
Description
Total Dust Concentration
mg
Facility 24 - Bauxite Transfer
.4 C. Gonzalez laborer shovelling
bauxite 9:00 am - 12:00 am
. 3-26-74
C. Gonzalez trainee bauxite
transfer tunnels 8:30 am - 10:10
3-27-74 .
am
C. Gonzalez trainee bauxite
tunnels 12:30 am - 3:55 pm
3-26-74
.
_
transfer
Y. Ramirez trainee shovelling
bauxite Jam 8:55 am - 12:00 am 3-26-74 .
Y. Ramirez trainee bauxite transfer tunnel & tripper 12:30 am - 3:45 3-26-74
R. Vasquez bauxite transfer man
9:05 am - 11:05 am 3-26-74
R. Vasquez bauxite transfer man 11:45 am - 3:45 pm 3-26-74
21 - C. Rodriquez RMW bauxite transfer tunnels 8:30 am - 12:00 am 3-27-74
.
28 - C. Rodriquez MW bauxite transfer tunnels 12:30 am - 3:30 pm 3-26-74
26 - A. Benauides BTM bauxite transfer tunnels 12:30 am - 3:45 pm 3-26-74
C7
62.58
21.80
71.02
16.27
13.02
15.75
18.91 4.56
23.28 113.29
005200
.
SHERWIN ALUMINA PLANT
.
Total Airborne Dust Sampling March 25-29 1974
Page 2
.
Study
Sample Number and
Description
Total Dust Concentration
mg)
Facility 24 - Bauxite Transfer continued
- 22 - A. V. Benauides slurry control
helper 8:45 - am 11:55 am 3-27-74
7 - J. Adams slurry control man
9:08 am - 12:00 am 3-26-74
23 - N. Shaw slurry control man
9:00 am - 12:00 am 3-27-74
27 1 N. Shaw slurry control man
12:30 am - 3:45 pm 3-27-74
158.10
6.16
5.74 4.56
Facility 5 - Bauxite Unloading
33 - R. Martinez RMM Raw materials man - 8:00 am - 12:30 am 4-10-74
, 34 - B. Swanner UEM Unloading equip-
ment man 8:00 am - 12:00 am 4-10-74
35 - A. B. Swanner UEM Unloading equip-
ment man 12:02 a.m. - 3:45 pm 4-10-74
18.18
3.04
10.56
Facility 90 - Alumina Loading and Unloading 1 - F. Atkinson scaler cleaning tunnels 8:00 am - 12:00 am 3-26-74
2 - C. Knox UEM cleaning tunnels
:
8:00 am - 12:30 am 3-26-74
3 - W. Reathy UEM cleaning tunnels 8:00 am - 12:00 am 3-26-74
6 - W. Shelley UEM Unloading cars 8:20 am - 12:20 am 3-26-74
contaminated 395.42
683.20 218.50
005201
"
SHERWIN ALUMINA PLANT Total Airborne Dust Sampling
March 25-29 1974 .
Page 3
Study
.
-
.
Sample Number and
Description
Total Dust
Concm eng trati) o- n
Facility 90 - Alumina Loading and Unloading
_
17 - W. Reathy UEM cleaning tunnels
.
+ 12:30 am - 3:15 pm 3-26-74
59.51
. 9 - F. Atkinson Scaler cleaning
tunnels 12:30 am- 3:15 pm
3-26-74
ert
26.06
;
12 Shelley UEM unloading cars
1:30 pm - 3:15 pm 3-26-74
.
_
11 - C. Knox UEM cleaning tunnels
.
1:30pm - 3:15 pm 3-26-74
. 9.17
.
662.9
-
~
|
Facility 51 1 Alumina Loading
;
18 - P. Primm weight master and car loader - 107.57
-
8:00 am - 12:00 am 3-27-74
oo
19 - P. Trevino car loader
8:00 am - 12:00 am 3-27-74
;
a
58.33
24 - P. Primm weight master and car loader
12:30
am
-
3:30
pm
3-27-74
ae
29 1 P. Trevino car loader
12:30 am - 3:30 pm 3-27-74
373.94
308.38
* OSHA standard for nuisance dust is 15 mg - eight
time weighted average
"
005202
SHERWIN ALUMINA PLANT SOLVENT VAPOR SAMPLING STUDY
MARCH 26 - 29 1974
Sample Number and
;
Description
_
G. Colmenro Electrician dipping electric motor
in varnish dip tank
8:50 am - 8:55 am
A. Groins area 33 bulbs in 5
varsol 8:15 am -
Oiler
cleaning cil
gallon can of
8:26 am
A. Groins Oiler
area 33 cleaning oil bulbs on bearing pumps ,
am am - 9:30 am
Xylene
PPM
11.05
,
Varscl
PPM **
9.38
.4.39
Exposure
Index 0.11
0.031
0.015
OSHA standard for xylene is 100 ppm - eight time weighted average
. .
Safety factor for varsol is 300 ppm
.
--
When exposure index equals 1 or more standards have been exceeded
me
005203
'
-
.
TABLE 4
|
COMIDENTIAL COMIDENTIAL COMIDENTIAL COMIDENTIAL
-
SHERWIN ALUMINA PLANT
SODIUM HYDROXIDE SAMPLING STUDY
MARCH 26-29 1974
'
Sample Number and Description
Sodium Hydroxide
Concentration
mg
Facility 46 - Hydrate Filtration
Cl Area sample Hydrate Filtration Area
232 and 234 filters 3-27-74
10:02 am - 10:28 am
C2 W. Allison Hydrate Filtration Operator : 10:00 am - 10:27 am 3-27-74
N.D N.D.
Facility 35
C3 E. Jones Filtration Man Helper FMH
10:50 am - 11:15 am 3-27-74
C4 H. Sneed Filtration Operator SOF filters
10:50 am - 11:24 am 3-27-74
05 H. Sneed Filtration Operator
11:24 am - 12:00 am 3-27-74 ~
C6 E. Jones FMH 11:18 am - 11:45 am 3-27-74
W.D. N.D.
Facility 45 - Percipitators
C9
.
R. Gutierrez TPMH 3:00 pm - 3:33 pm 3-28-74
--10 D. C. Powell TPMH 3:03 pm - 3:36 pm
3-28-74
C11
H. Bundock
TPMH
3:05 pm - 3:34 pm 3-28-74
C12
W. Hinchu 3:05 pm -
TPMH 3:35 pm
3-28-74
C13
W. Neville TPM pm 3:08 pm - 3:34 pm
.
3-28-74
.
N.D.
:
N.D.
005204
SHERWIN ALUMINA PLANT
Sodium Hydroxide Sampling March 26-29 1974 Page 2
Study
CONFIDENTIALCONFIDENTIAL CONFIDENTIAL
CONFIDENTIAL
CONFIDENTIAL CONFIDENTIAL
CONFIDENTIALCONFIDENTIAL
CONFIDENTIAL
CONFIDENTIALCONFIDENTIAL
CONFIDENTIALCONFIDENTIAL
Sample Number and
Description
Facility 230 - Recovery
C7 R. Trevino Recovery Operator Helper 9:04 am - 10:00 am 3-28-74
C8 W. B. Gerald Recovery Operator
9:04 am brow 9:50 am 3-28-74
Sodium Hydroxide Concentration
mg
N.D.
N.D.
135 135
m *
OSHA standard for sodium hydroxide is 2
. weighted average
eight time
**
Detectable
005205
~aVau ENO %NSOdya 98 95 09 6h 09 ep GS nL oS 96L) LE 49 09 LL
=" ON -x xX
xX
Xx
=X
XxX
Xx
xX
Xx
x
XxX
=X
UAO Veast SAX
SHERWIN ALUMINA ALUMINAPLANT =
x
x
X
dobad %L %L %L %L al NOISE
SURVEY
SURVEY
USING
AUDIO
DOSIMETERS
DOSIMETERS
DOSIMETERS
8
5
auNsodxa O0h2 MARCH MARCH - 29 1974 OOh2 O02 0080 of <2 O < <2 O20 O <L0 O&ST READOO9T O9T- 00n2 0OhZ 00g0 BADGE BADGE ODOT EXPOSURE EXPOSURE EXPOSURE PERIOD 115 OVER OUT
PowerGNVId hl6T Power J.
27
70
VNIWATY
Power
-
Se
NIAYSH Power HOU
wf
"
Wels ON G2ET 9ETT 110 Area 066T
Foster ealy Baty 110 Area B2ay TTT OTT 111 Area OTT Phagan
Power .
1 0 Francis ayted Area sagex
'T ST9A
Area
gq
'{ HM Ty Lf *Y
=
Terel dAamog leNod 110 Area damod
a
d
a gl 4) Qo
|
9 <hT 1600 1600 2400 8 Agel --,--,,,--,--, 58
\
_
Bauy Bady 080 160 160 8 CONFIDENTIAL --,--,,,--,--, 60
OTT ITT 0800 1600 1600 8 CONFIDENTIAL --,-- --,--,,--,--,--, 88
.
8 LaytVd UOSTN 080 080 --,--,,,--,--, 50
240 "TH D
2330 2330 73
*H 63
*q@ HY 1600 2330 2330 7 Ty --, 179
=
A9nod B 240 0730 0730 7 Lavo 37
Yates Yates Ze 20 Area le OL
6
1530
2T 9
1530 Z^' eh --, g
, :
77
nage: C92: Senigdh pln
LV hL~Se- hb-S2- h-9e- hL-9e hl-ge- he~92" Les Le Le- yL-Q2" hl-Qe- hoe: yl-Ge-
;
DEPTLNVId Ray Power J.
YNIWATV Power Saabs
-
TA
S@
VL
NIMWHS Scaler A.
Scaler
.
Vi unsodxaLNO % tL od L9 hh Gh <T <T Gzz ht 26h h&
Eh
YG ON x
Xx >
J
5
2x 3X
&
7 YA O GLT SHERWIN
ALUMINA
PLANT
x
x
x
x
x
'
NOISE SURVEY SURVEY USING AUDIO AUDIO DOSIMETERS DOSIMETERS 8 @ 9 @ 8
doLs MARCH 25 29 1974 O09T dO0n2 aQhz Oo9T O09T OOn2 O09T
AYNSOdXa Luis OO9T O09T 000 0080 00g0 O09T O0O09T OOg0 0090 OOST 0090
JOB v a
OOhZ
OO9T spaeuys
EXPOSUR ostou
gaoava"ON 110 Area Lg2t 1578 1578 A gogt 1600 2400 Otz2 LLLT
VHSO
.
Area
7 7
UITA
110 Area valy
JaT
adTayULFN) adteg67
=NOTLdIYSa 2019 2019 JaTBOS 0800 080 160 8
Scaler Scaler OTT
FUTIduao-~ aor
*oT
eg
X
*
oreo4848
i
,
;
Scaler 2019 080 SUWEFTA THITM a4geoTpu sTouelg 2019 8 .
Scaler SWYN Scaler STITH eyo y 160 Scaler Scaler [Ty 2219 2219 "DO *y 0800 1600 00 O
.
H quaode
Calc
.
Helper deo
177 177
aeTBOS aTeog 080
160
8
8
tadg
*a do
oQT
uty4
T80 I54RILFY Calc
. Helper
Le S8 9g
S
he
1600 2400 8 LL
gL
<7 se eas re a *.
ad oO i cD ~
non
compliant
compliant
with
OSHA
OSHA
noise
standards
standards
standards
.
in-Le
hi-Le:
f#Ll-Le:
SONTeA
Gentlemen
In view of the recent enactment of the Occupational Safety and Health Act we find it necessary to catalog in detail all materials which could possibly be construed as having any constituents harmful to personnel It is not enough to merely certify that such materials are safe or affix a label to the container warning of toxicity or other ill effect we must now be in a position of knowing exactly what the constituents are and in what proportions We are now purchasing or will possibly purchase the following materials classified as being subject to inquiry
Your cooperation with us in preparing this information will be appreciated
Very truly yours
REYNOLDS METALS COMPANY
Purchasing Agent
005208
13. 13. 3I 3I 3I 3I FW ke
Occupational Safety and Health Administration
MATERIAL SAFETY DATA SHEET
Required under USDL Safety and Health Regulations for Ship Repairing
Shipbuilding and Shipbreaking 29 CFR 1915 1916 1917
ONE NO ER1367
MANUFACTURER'S NAME
SECTION 1
EMERGENCY TELEPHONE NO
ADDRESS Amber Street City State and ZIP Code
CHEMICAL NAME AND SYNONYMS CHEMICAL FAMILY
TRADE NAME AND SYNONYMS FORMULA
SECTION II - HAZARDOUS INGREDIENTS
PAINTS PRESERVATIVES & SOLVENTS
PIGMENTS
. ras
TLV
%
Units
ALLOYS AND METALLIC COATINGS
,
BASE METAL
CATALYST
ALLOYS
VEHICLE
METALLIC COATINGS
SOLVENTS
FILLER METAL PLUS COATING OR CORE FLUX
ADDITIVES
OTHERS
OTHERS
HAZARDOUS MIXTURES OF OTHER LIQUIDS SOLIDS OR GASES
.
TLV
a4 Units
-
% Units
BOILING POINT FF
VAPOR PRESSURE mm Hg VAPOR DENSITY AIR SOLUBILITY IN WATER APPEARANCE AND ODOR
SECTION 11 - PHYSICAL DATA
SPECIFIC GRAVITY HO
PERCENT VOLATILE VOLATILE
ah
EVAPORATION EVAPORATION RATE
.
SECTION IV - FIRE AND EXPLOSION HAZARD DATA
FLASH POINT Method used EXTINGUISHING MEDIA
FLAMMABLE LIMITS
i
Lel
i!
Usl
1
L
SPECIAL FIRE FIGHTING PROCEDURES
UNUSUAL FIRE AND EXPLOSION HAZARDS
FAGE 1
*
Continued on reverse side
Form OSHA
Rev. May 72
005209
7.J. bt mb
Ok emcees
3I
Lene
Occupational Safety and Health Administration
MATERIAL MATERIALMATERIAL SAFETSYAFETY SAFETY
DATA
SHEET
SHEET
Required under USDL Safety and Health Regulations for Ship Repairing
.
Shipbuilding and Shipbreaking 29 CFR 1915 1976 1917
OMB No. 44-1387
MANUFACTURER'S NAME
ADDRESS Number Street City State and ZIP Codel
CHEMICAL NAME AND SYNONYMS CHEMICAL FAMILY
SECTION !
EMERGENCY TELEPHONE NO
TRADE NAME AND SYNONYMS
FORMULA
SECTION 11 -
.
PAINTS
PRESERVATIVES
PRESERVATIVES
&
SOLVENTS
ra
PIGMENTS
4
.
CATALYST
HAZARDOUS INGREDIENTS
TLV
Units
:
ALLOYS AND METALLIC COATINGS
BASE METAL
ALLOYS
VEHICLE
METALLIC COATINGS
SOLVENTS ADDITIVES
FILLER METAL
PLUS COATING OR CORE FLUX
OTHERS
OTHERS I
HAZARDOUS MIXTURES OF OTHER LIQUIDS SOLIDS OR GASES
TLV %
Units
-
TLV
% | Units
SECTION III - PHYSICAL DATA
BOILING POINT F
:
VAPOR PRESSURE mm Hg
VAPOR DENSITY AIR
SOLUBILITY IN WATER
SPECIFIC GRAVITY H2O
VOLATILE PERCENT VOLATILE
ee
BY VOLUME
&
EVAPORATION RATE
APPEARANCE AND ODOR
SECTION IV - FIRE AND EXPLOSION HAZARD DATA
FLASH POINT Method used
EXTINGUISHING MEDIA
FLAMMABLE LIMITS
i
Lel
|
SPECIAL FIRE FIGHTING PROCEDURES
|
Vel
fl
UNUSUAL FIRE AND EXPLOSION HAZARDS
PAGE 1
.
Continued on reverse side
Form OSHA
Rev. May 72
005209
we
THRESHOLD LIMIT VALUE EFFECTS OF OVEREXPOSURE
SECTION V - HEALTH HAZARD DATA
EMERGENCY AND FIRST AID PROCEDURES
STABILITY
UNSTABLE
SECTION VI - REACTIVITY DATA
CONDITIONS TO AVOID
STARLE
INCOMPATABILITY Materiais to areid~...
HAZARDOUS DECOMPOSITION PRODUCTS
HAZARDOUS POLYMERIZATION
MAY OCCUR
WILL NOT DCCUR
CONDITIONS TO AVOID
SECTION VII - SPILL OR LEAK PROCEDURES
STEPS TO BE TAKEN IN CASE MATERIAL IS RELEASED OR SPILLED
WASTE DISPOSAL METHOD
SECTION VIII RESPIRATORY PROTECTION Specify type
- SPECIAL PROTECTION INFORMATION
VENTILATION
LOCAL EXHAUST .
SPECIAL
MECHANICAL General PROTECTIVE GLOVES
OTHER PROTECTIVE EQUIPMENT
OTHER
| EYE PROTECTION
SECTION IX - SPECIAL PRECAUTIONS
PRECAUTIONS TO BE TAKEN IN HANDLING AND STORING
OTHER PRECAUTIONS
"
PAGE 2
GPO 934.110
.
Form OSHA
Rev. May 72
005210