Document r20V1k8JM6D2D6M0mOE0mDZJ

Message From: Sent: To: CC: Subject: Alan Matheson [amatheson@utah.gov] 7/18/2017 12:49:03 PM Bennett, Tate [/o=ExchangeLabs/ou=Exchange Administrative Group (FYDIBOHF23SPDLT)/cn=Recipients/cn=lfa92542f7ca4d01973bl8b2fllb9141-Bennett, El] Cody Stewart [codystewart@utah.gov]; Greenwalt, Sarah [/o=ExchangeLabs/ou=Exchange Administrative Group (FYDIBOHF23SPDLT)/cn=Recipients/cn=6cl3775b8f424e90802669b87bl35024-Greenwalt,] Re: Discussion Questions Thanks for the notice. Sent from my iPhone On Jui 18, 2017, at 6:44 AM, Bennett, Tate <BennettTate@epa.gov> wrote: Morning! Thanks for all your planning that went into today. Below are some questions state specific that COULD come up on our end, in case you wanted to take a look beforehand. State Specific 1. What are the biggest concerns you see for arid states as we define WOTUS? 2. UT provided rule text that was developed in coordination with counties. With the list of excluded waters provided, what impact might that have on the state's NPDES program where you would have an increase in conduits and conveyances? 3. Can you say more about what you mean by "regional variations that can swallow the rule?" Sierra Club v. EPA 18cv3472 NDCA Tier 10 ED 002061 00065566-00001