Document qmjVvwRbzvjG0jVmGM1gkErwE

Industries Company Date: May 13, 1980 'Subject: O.E. Priorities Memorandum J. J. Brown J. J. Lukas Please consider this an amendment to my memo of May 12th. Under a non-asbestos, non-metallic block, please amend to include the following statement: yftiAr Js * These numbers are predicated for the years 1983-1985 on the fact that there will be government (state or federal) legislation mandating non-asbestos materials. / , i fst di/A ' V* - to#/ ^1, Per our discussion May 12th, it will be relatively easy to obtain non-asbestos approvals from brakp--manuf-aefcurer^ such .as Rockwell and Eaton. However,.-'iir~order to sell this iai--to Uie OEMs'"with the exception of Mack Corporation, evidence must be presented to cost justify the 30% premium*/ e-are requesting for non^asbestos materials^"CJEMs such as Whie and Ford Motor Company will'~not"Huy non-asbestos ^materials on the moral issue of non-asbestos versus asbestos, y/^SSt on-Ly if the government mandated them to do so or if the premium could be justified based on longer lining life, s' iif8f etc. _________ of this date f (r)p~~~ om^testijxcKiustifies tne~"-eaim that the cost of operation is in direct relationship to' the premium being charged for non-asbestos materials. AFSchmaltz/file jp za<-:(C--/ 1 . -c-c.. y>w& // y < /* SPNY 005362