Document qmVdEEo18YmL018gDkgQjqpeq

- - , - . i ' f\i3 July 18# 193k Dr* M* s Medical Department! Frlgldaire Corporation Dayton, Ohio ^ '* *! -2 Dear Dr* Shafer* v , 1 * *- >*?V^ jV*' ; We are enclosln herewith analytical ` - .report on the urine of Mr* 219 182 In view of the absence of any lead In the specimen. It would seem unlikely that any acute symptoms now present are related to lead* However, the sample is rather small and If there has been a considerable interval 6 fco 8 weeks * between his exposure and.the col)eetlon of the samples, a figure * such as the above is possible* It might be a good plan to secure a 2-1/2 or 3 liter sample on this man after he has been back at work a week or two* that is, if you wish to estimate the magnitude of hie exposure in the Paint ; Department* ^ '> Very truly yours. 7 - JVfc % WPMjIS Willard F* M8chle,M*D*: P*S* The count of 12 stippled cells per fifty fields on the blood smears Is not remarkable and can not be considered as evidence of abnormal exposure*