Document qm8rryNkZqXby3weM0B8oG6gE

11/02/92 MMM WCH KJW Please review and forward your comments to me before Friday, Nov.6. I will then coordinate the MfinalM response with the NGC 12558 UIFGoodrich INTER-ORGANIZATION CORRESPONDENCE TO Mike Marshall FIELD POINT OR DEPT. & BLDG. NO. FROM FIELD POINT OR 0S>T. & BLDG, NO. Phil Donataccio SUBJECT Corporate E> H&S Audit Corrective Action Plan (Draft) DATE YOUR LETTER DATE THIS LETTER 11/2/92 Attached is the Henry Plant reply to the 1992 Corrective Audit conducted August 10-14, 1992. If you or your staff have any questions, please let us know. /ZCJ Phil Donataccio MM/PD9284 cc: G.E. Higby - without attachments* J. D. Krumholz - without attachments* M.E. Guyer - without attachments* R.J. Grahek - without attachments* K. J. Willings - without attachments* * Attachments not sent due to "Confidentiality" requirements. BFG-495S-E U 4 D Priming Co.. Msnry, 111. 1437 200'30Ud SI wodd 80:01 26. I HON aUDIT-PC 1.=1 Vorksheet Primatech Inc. Company: BFGOODRICH Facility: HENRY Page: 1 Session: 1 06-10-92 Revision: 0 10-26-32 System: 1 MANAGEMENT OF CHANCE Category: BECOMMENDaTIONS Dwg$: ---------------------------------------- -+----------------------------------------------------- -----+--------------------------- * I QUESTION ; A i ROiABAS ; RECOMMENDATIONS |BY j COMMENTS 1 WWTP V-NOTCH WEIK WaS NOT alibratel. p; ! : ; \ i : ; ;! ; :[ !; :: \\ \ :; ti : ' . the radiation safety FFICEB HAS NOT BEEN TRAINED AND THE PERMIT HAS NOT BEEN UPDATED. ; pj JJ ;; 5; :; i 3. ENVIRONMENTAL PROJECT? !c1 (IMPACT) ASSESSMENTS WERE NOT J J COMPLETED. 11 ;; ]J ;: :; *| * 4. SCAFFOLDING WAS NOT INSPECTED QUARTERLY- ic; ;; ;; [[ :; :; ;; j [1. CALIBRATE 1 1V 1 J 11 1 1 I t 1 11 11 11 l k 1 11 1i 44 1 [2. TRAIN OFPICER nh it t 11 a l1 1 [3. PROVIDE JASSESSMENTS 1 1 t Tf k k k 11 )1 j-|. INSPECT 11 1 1 1 X l ;wjg;i. 11/92: the v- : 1 [NOTCH WEIS IS TO BE : 1 }CHECKED IN I ; ;ACCORDANCE WITH : ; \CHAPTER 6 OF THE [EPS'S NPDES [ ` iCOMPLIANCE ; ; [ INSPECTION MANUAL. :this will be ;PERFORMED ON AN IANNUAL BASIS, a [calibration check [WILL BE PERFORMED ;MONTHLY THE [SECONDARY MRaSUBINC `.DEVICES AND THE [COMPUTER READOUT TO 1INSURE RELIABLE [DATA. (SDJ.WJG) {12/1/92. DEG[2. 11/92: TRAINING [HAS BEEN SCHEDULED [FOB D.E.GIFPIN THE [WEEK OF NOV 9TH TO [ATTEND TEX TN [RADIATION SCHOOL[(DEG) 12/1/92 DMK[3- 11/92: ALL RA'S, JAR'S, AND GPO'S NOW [HAVE ENVIRONMENTAL [IMPACT ASSESSMENTS [INCLUDED TO INSURE [THAT ENVIRONMENTAL [CONCERNS ARE [ADDRESSED. COMPLETE [9/1/92 DEG[ 4. A PM MAINTENANCE ; [WORK ORDER HAS BEEN [ ;GENERATED TO INSPECT [ J THE SCAFFOLDING ; [ON A quarterly [ [BASIS. THE PLANT [ [PRESENTLY AND IN THE : [Past inspects prior : [TO Each use of the NGC 12560 G00 ` 39tid 61 UOdd 80:01 26 I 0 ON AUDIT-PC l.l W'ortsheet Prtaatech Inc. Coapany: BFCOOD6ICH Facility: HENRY Page; 2 Session; i 08-10-32 Revision: 0 10--26--82 System: 1 Management op change Category: RECOMMENDATIONS Dvg*: --------------- ---------- * -- -+ QUESTION ; a; REMARKS ; recommendations ;by ; COMMENTS l1 {SCAFFOLDING WHICH IS 1 {MORE FREQUENT THAN r [QUARTERLY. {(COMPLETE) [10/30/32. Session: 1 08-10-92 System: 2 RESPONSIBLE CARE Category: RECOMMENDAtIONS Revision: 0 10-26-92 Dwgi: QUESTION ; a; -+-+- . THERE HAS NOT SUFFICIENT [P[ ocumrntatiok supporting stage; ; I PROGRESS or THE RESPONSIBLE; ; ARE POLLUTION PREVENTION ODE. {; * REMARKS ------------------------------------------------- --- ---------- *-----------T- recommendations 1bv ; COMMENTS . PROVIDE AN [DMKi1. 11/92: AN UP-TO- 5 UP-TO-DATE {DATE POLLUTION ; QUALITATIVE !PREVENTION CODE ; EMISSIONS INVENTORY. ;INVENTORY OF ;EMISSIONS Has been ;DEVELOPED. {priorities roe 2REDUCTION WILL BE ;mabe based on {POTENTIAL HEALTH AND JSAFETY IMPACTS. [(DMK) 3/1/93- 2. EVALUATE POTENTIAL IMPACT OF RELEASES ON THE ENVIRONMENT AND THE HEALTH AND SAFETY OF EMPLOYEES aND THE COMMUNITY. MKJ2. 11/92: AN {EVALUATION OP THE {POTENTIAL RELEASE ON {THE ENVIRONMENT AND ;thb safety of [EMPLOYEES AND THE JCOMMUNITY HAS BEEN !PERFORMED THIS WAS {PERFORMED IN {CONNECTION WITH THE [REQUIREMENTS OF THE {ILLINOIS CHEMICAL {SAFETY ACT. 3. ESTABLISH DKK[3. 11/32: ONCE THE PRIORITIES TAKING [PRIORITIES HAVE BEE INTO CONCERN {ESTABLISHED, POTENTIAL HEALTH AND {MEETINGS WITH PLANT SAFETY IMPACTS. {EMPLOYEES AND THE [PUBLIC WILL BE HELD [TO RECEIVE THEIR [RECOMMENDATIONS. {fDMK, PD) S/1/93 e------ --------- ------------------------------------- * NGC 12561 t? 0 0 39Ud 61 UOdd 66:01 26. I HON AUDIT-PC 1.51 Worksheet Prioatoeh Inc. Coopany: BFCoodrich Facility: HENRY Page: 3 Session- 1 OS-10-92 Systeo: 2 RESPONSIBLE CARE Category: RECOMMENDATIONS Revision; 0 10-26-92 Dvgs: * QUESTION l1 41 1 t 1 \1 ;a REMaRKS { RECOMMENDATIONS [BY COMMENTS ! 1 [4. PROVIDE DME 4. SEE ABOVE [ { {MEASUREMENT OF ON { {GOING REDUCTION ;PROGRESS. <t k t Session: l 06-10-92 Revision: 0 10-26- 92 Syste*: 3 SOLID AND HAZARDOUS w.\STE MANAGEMENT Category: RCOMMENDATIONS DvgJ; QUESTION {A : remarks { RECOMMENDATIONS {BY { COMMENTS { :i. Hazard waste management was*p :i. all seven {DEFICIENT l1 > IN SEVERAL AREAS. { :satellite ; [accumulation areas ! [WERE NOT INSPECTED '.OK A WEEKLY BASIS. 1. ADDRESS : ; i > ;2, DRUMS OF ;Hazardous waste os {THE FLAMMABLE {STORAGE PAD HERE NOT {LABELED WITH THE ! WORDS '`HAZARDOUS {WASTE'' OR THE {ACCUMULATION DATE. {3. CONTAMINATED {MATERIAL, CONTAINED 1IK DRUMS LOCATED ON [THE FLAMMABLE {STORAGE PaD. HaS NOT {BEEN DETERMINED TO {BE A HAZARDOUS OR | NONHAZABJDOUS VaSTI. {4. ONE BULK {CONTAINER OF waSTE [WAS IDENTIFIED AS ; {CONTAINING A ; {Hazardous waste su : [WAS NOT LABELED AMD : {DID NOT HAVE an : [ACCUMULATION DATE- { {S. A DRUM OP ; [hazardous waste in ; ithe laboratory JDMK {1. 11/92; THE PLANT [Waste handling 1 [PROCEDURES HAVE BEEN {THOROUGHLY REVIEWED [WITH RESPECT TO 8CRA [GUIDELINES, BEG `POLICY AND GMP SINCE [THE AUDIT AND [CORRECTED {ACCORDINGLY. { 1) ALL SATELLITE {ACCUMULATION AREAS {ARE NOW INSPECTED {WEEKLY BY AN SAE {OPERATOR. THE {PRODUCTION OPERATORS {ARE RESPONSIBLE FOR {MAINTAINING THE {SATELLITE {ACCUMULATION DRUMS [IN ACCORDANCE WITH ;bcsa regulations. ;(COMPLETE) 3/1/92. J 2)317) PROCEDURES [HAVE BEEN [ESTABLISHED AND [TRAINING GIVEN TO {INSURE THaT NO {Hazardous waste is {STORED ON THE {FLAMMABLE STORAGE [PAD. THE S&S {OPERATORS ARE {RESPONSIBLE FOR {RECEIVING ALL { {Hazardous waste promj NOC 12562 00 * 36dd 61 UOdd 66=01 66, \ HON Aimit-pc i.5i Worksheet Primatech Inc. Cotcpany' BFGOODRICH facility: HENRY Page: 4 Session! L 08-10-92 Revision: 0 ID-26-92 System: 3 SOLIS AND HAZARDOUS UaSTE HaKaGSMEXT Category: RECOMMENDATIONS Dwgs: QUESTION {A| REMARKS 1 ; RECOMMENDATIONS : ;satellite ; [accumulation area ; ;as not closed with ! ;a lid. [ * 6. potentially [ [REUSABLE MATERIALS ; [WERE STORED IS DRUMS : :labeled scrap- and [ J-UaSTE- at the I !FLAMMABLE STORAGE ; ;pad. ;; 1 ri * ** i i 1 < ia at a ii ii It ia ii 4J 1 ai :; ;; I ; BY [ T^ COMMENTS [ ; ;PRODUCTIONS ; ; 1 OPERATIONS- ; 1 5(COMPLETE) 3/1/92 ; 1 ; 41 THE BOX IN ;QUESTION WAS LABELED '.THE SAME DaY AND WaS iSHIPPED S/21/92. 1THERE ARE [ INDICATIONS THAT THE `.material presently JBEING DISPOSED OF IN [THE CONTAINER IS NO iLONGER HAZARDOUS [SINCE THE MATERIAL [WHICH MADE IT `.HAZARDOUS IS NOV * SOLD AS OFF-GRADE I PRODUCT. WE ARE IN '.THE PROCESS OF [CHARACTERIZING THE '.WASTE. (DM*, SDJ) [12/1/93. 1 S> PROCEDURES AND 1 CHECKS ARE IN PLACE !TO INSURE THAT LIDS `ARE CLOSD AT TIMES :on satellite ;ACCUMULATION DRUMS [EXCEPT WHEN BEING [FILLED. (COMPLETE1 [9/1/92. 2. waste oil was sent to a FACILITY WHICH WaS NOT AUTHORIZED BY BPG. J ; ;c;7. the facility 2. CORRECT J [DISPOSED OP WASTE : [OIL AT aN OIL ; ;RECYCLING FACILITY ; [THAT Was NOT [ ;INCLUDED ON THE ! !FACILITY'S LIST OP ; APPROVED TREATMENT *, 'STORAGE AND DISPOSE ; ;<tsdi facilities. DHK[2. 11/92: PERMISSIO [WAS RECEIVED FROM [DIVISION [ENVIRONMENTAL PRIOR [TO SHIPPING THE USE [OIL TO SAPETY K1EEN 1(COMPLETE). ;i 300 " 39bd NGC 12563 61 UOdd 0t7:0I 26. I n ON AUDIT-PC 1.51 Worksheet Primatech Inc. Company: BFGOODEICH Facility: HENRY Page: S Session: 1 0S-10-92 Revision: 0 10-26-92 System: 4 DRINKING WaTER MANAGEMENT Category: RECOMMENDATIONS Dwg QUESTION ; a; REMARKS RECOMMENDATIONS :by COMMENTS ;i. sampling results were not ;bepobted to the state within 130 Days. ;p; ;; ; . THERE IS NO DOCUMENTATION THAT POTABLE WATER SYSTEM IS LEAD FREE". JPJ ;| '! , l . resolve . GENERATE OCUWENTaTION mk;i. n/92: THE ;analytical ; ; 1 REQUIREMENTS I ;REQUIRED UNDER THE 1 ILLINOIS PUBLIC ;HEALTH DEPARTMENT ;aRE BEING BEVI ETWEE ;to determine ;COMPLIANCE- (DHK) 212/31/92 i DttKU- 11/92: KO RECORDS ;are available to !DETERMINE IF "LRaD JFREE" SOLDEE AND 5 FLUX HAS BEEN USED `.IN THE POTABLE WATER 1 SYSTEM SINCE JUNE 219, 1936. a JMGNITORING PROCEDURE `.WILL BE ESTABLISHED `FOB LEAD IN THE }POTABLE WaTER. .NOTICE WILL BE ;POSTED FOR POSSIBLE ;LEAD CONTAMINATION 2IN DRINKING WATER, SPROCEDURES WIU- BE lESTABLISHED TO {INSURE THAT "LEAD :FRE" PIPES, SOLDER JAND flux are used 1 2 ALL FUTURE CKANGfcS !TO THE DRINKINC JWATER SYSTEM, <PMK) ;12/31/92. 3. THESE AS NO NOTIFICATION IP; POSTED INFORMING PERSONNEL OF \ \ THE LEAD CONTENT IS THE 5I drinking water. i: !4. the facility has not ;demonstrated that the water !SYSTEM IS "LEAD FREE". ! p: "S. NON-POTABLE WATER SYSTEM IS I Pi ;not labeled : . 3. POST NOTITICATIO DMKiS. SEE ABOVE :i. ADDRESS Js. LABEL dhk;4. see above ;DMKj 5. 11/92: A PLOW IDlAGRAtt OF THE NGC 12564 ^00'39Ud G l UOdJ 0t- : 0 I 3B , 1 n ON AUDIT-PC 1.51 Worksheet Primatech Inc. Coapany: BFGOODBICR Facility: HENRY page: 6 Session: 1 0S-10-92 Revision: 0 10-26-92 System: 4 DR1NKINC WATER MANAGEMENT Category: RECOMMENDATIONS I>wg : QUESTION { A{ remarks ; RECOMMENDATIONS { BY : COMMENTS jpotable water {SYSTEM WILL BE {DEVELOPED. {APPROPRIATE LABELING {WILL BE MADE TO {PREVENT INADVERTENT {CONSUMPTION OF NON[POTABLE WATER. (DMK) [8/31/93. Session: 1 08-10-92 Revision: 0 10-26-92 system: 5 AIR OUALITY MANAGEMENT Category: RECOMMENDATIONS Dwg? ' -QUESTION {A J REMARKS -------------- ----------------------- - ----------------------------------------------- EECOMMENDATIONS {BY { COMMENTS -------------------------------------------------- . THERE ARE NO WRITTEN PROCEDURES POE RNSURXHC aIR {Pi ;: {l. ISSUE PROCEDURES {DMK{1. 11/92; ALL ; ; [EXISTING WRITTEN POLLUTION SOURCE COMPLIANCE. \ < [PROCEDURES WILL RE ; { {CHECKED TO DETERMINE ; : {IF PROCEDURES ABE IN { 1 {PLACE TO INSURE ; ; {PROPER operation of : : :thr pollution { {CONTROL DEVICES. ALL ; : {aib pollution I { {CONTROL DEVICES THAT { { {ABE NOT INCLUDED IN { { {WRITTEN PROCEDURES { { {WILL HAVE A { { i `PROCEDURE { { ; {ESTABLISHED TO { { { {INSURE PROPER { ; { {OPERATION. RECORDS { ; { {OP CONTROL DEVICE { ; { {MAINTENANCE (WHERE J : { {APPLICABLE) WILL BE { * i {MAINTAINED. { ! { {(MEG,JDK) 8/31/93 800'B9bd 6 \ UOd d I t? : 0 I EG . I HON iUDIT-PC 1.51 Coopany: BPGOODE1CH Facility: HENRY Worksheet Priatech Inc. Page: 7 Session: 1 06-10-92 Revision: 0 10-26-92 Systes: 6 COWUNITY-RICHT-TO-KNOU Category: RECOMMENDATIONS Dug#: l QGESTXOK : a: ;l. THEEf IS NO DOCUMENTATION c: [THAT SaBa 302 NOTIFICATION WaS i t 1 SUBMITTED- 41 l 11 t J 1 1 ezmaeks RECOMMENDATIONS ; BY 1 COMMENTS 1. GENERATE DOCUMENTATION DMS'l. 11/92: A COPY OF [THE SARA 302 [NOTIFICATION LETTER [SUBMITTED TO THE [SERC IS ON FILE IN !THE ENVIRONMENTAL [OFFICE. (COMPLETE! [5/6/87. Session: 1 03-10-92 Systea: 7 HAZARD COMMUNICATION Category: RECOMMENDATIONS Revision: 0 10-26-92 Dvg<: [ QUESTION [A 6 l. BOXES OF PVC DISPERSION IP STRAININGS HaD TWO CONFLICTING*. ; Hazard labels. ; i a k 1 1 REMARKS [ RECOMMENDATIONS [BY J COMMENTS | . CORRECT [11EG [ 1. THE CZON 11 [WAREHOUSE WILL BE ll [AUDITED FOR a \ [NONCOMPLIANCE AND ai [THE PaCKaCINC ta ;labeling will be [CORRECTED. (NEC) [12/31/92. 1 [ [ [ ; [ [ Session: 1 08-10-92 Revision: 0 10-26-92 System: S INDUSTRIAL HYGIENE MANAGEMENT Category: RECOMMENDATIONS Dug#: QUESTION [A[ 1. APPROXIMATELY FIVE (5) *1 PERCENT OF EXPOSURE MONITORING RESULTS FOR VINYL CHLORIDE l a EXCEEDED THE PEL. ii l i< t ti i ii ii ii i 2. PROCEDURE FOR "YELLOW LIGHT** ALARM DOES NOT ENSURE EXPOSURES WILL BE LESS IHAN THE PEL. P[ k *1 l k REMARKS RECOMMENDATIONS [BY [ COMMENTS [ 1. MAINTAIN FOLLOWUP DEC[1. PLANT CURRENTLY PROGRAM [CONDUCTS BOARD OF [INQUIRES WHENEVER AN [INDIVIDUAL EXCEEDS A [PEL WITHOUT [RESPIRATORY [EQUIPMENT. ACTION [ITEMS ARE GENERATED [AND FOLLOWED UP [OCCURS AS Part op IOUR BOX PROGRAM. [(CONTINUING A [COMPLETE ) 2. CORRECT DEC[2. ALTERNATIVES ABE [BEING [INVESTIGATED TO [INSURE THAT NGC 12566 60039bd 6 l UOdd I V : 0 I 26. 1 HON aUDIT-PC 1.51 Worksheet Primatccb Inc. Company: BPGOODEICH Facility: HENRY Page: S Session: 1 05-10-92 Revision: 0 10-2E-92 System: S INDUSTRIAL HYGIENE MANAGEMENT Category: RECOMMENDATIONS QUESTION *-*--------------------------------------------- 1 ;a; remarks ; + -+ Dwgi: RECOMMENDATIONS THEBE IS HOT A PORTlAl HEAT (P( TRESS PROGRAM. (; ADDRESS IBY ! COMMENTS (PERSONNEL ' ;arb not exposurrp to; ;greater than the pel; ;WITHOUT USE OP a (respirator while (PERFORMING WORK ; 1 I UNDER A YELLOW ; I LIGHT. (MSG/RDM) I ( 3/1/93. I EG(3. a PLANT SAERTY '.POLICY WILL BE I ISSUED IDENTIFYING ;the current training ;program plus (ADDITIONAL (ADMINISTRATIVE and (EQUIPMENT CONTROLS. ((DEG) 6/1/93. . DOCUMENTATION POE NVESTIGAT1NG STS'S WAS ISORGaNIZED AND INCOMPLETE ;P( (( (| . ADDRESS DEC(4. A PLANT PROCEDURE (WILL BE ISSUED (IDENTIFYING THE ;ADMINISTRATION OF (STS'S AND HEABING (BECORDABILITY. THE (PROCEDURE WILL (INCLUDE THE (DOCUMENTATION (REQUIREMENTS. (DEC) (12/31/92. 5. SEVERAL EXIT SIGNS WERE NOT! ( ILLUMINATED. J; 5. COMPLETE EXIT SIGN PROGRAM DEG(5. THE PRESENT ;PROGRAM TO REPLACE (EXISTING EXIT SIGNS (THAT DO NOT MEET TH (ILLUMINATION (REQUIREMENTS WILL BE| JCOMPLETED ALONG WITH( (THE AUDITING OP EXIT* (SIGNS THAT ARE (LOCATED ON THE ( ! (DOORS. SIGNS THAT ( (ARE NOT VISIBLE WHEN; (THE DOOR IS OPEN ( (WILL BE RELOCATED. ;<DEC) 12/31/32. ( ( NGC 12567 0 I 0 39bd 61 UOdd IP0 I 26 I HON AUDIT-PC 1.51 Worksheet Pru3Tofh Inc. Company: BFGOODRICF. Facility: HENRY Page: 9 Session: 1 QS-10-32 Revision: 0 10-26-92 System: S INDUSTRIAL HYGIENE MANAGEMENT Category: RECOMMENDATIONS Dwg*: [ QUESTION :A; REMARKS RECOMMENDATIONS [BY l COMMENTS 5 [6, PALLETS IN PVC SACK AREA [WERE BOWED. 1 1 1 1 1 4 41 11 41 11 k <1 1 1 :c: 11 11 1 k a 11 11 11 1 1 11 I1 l| 1 kI t1 * 1 l 1a tl 1 It 16. ADDRESS 1 1t 11 >1 k 1 > 1 1 4 1 1 K % l 1 l 1 * EC [6. THE WOODEN !PALLETS THaT WERE 1 BOWING IN THIS ;application have ;been taken out oy 'SERVICE. IN ADDITION ;the super sacks are I BEING STACKED IN a ; MANNER THaT *INDIVIDUALS ARE NOT [PHYSICALLY EXPOSED [TO A SECOND LEVEL OP [BAGS. (COMPLETE} ;a/i4ys2. 1 4 t `7. EYEWaSH STATIONS WERE ; p; 7 . ADDRESS DEG[7 EACH PRODUCTION :UNCLEAN. k 1 1 1 1 X i l 1 ta kl lk kk 1k 11 1 1k 1 1 1 4 1 k 4 1 1 a 1 i 1 1 t 1 [AREA WILL BE [RESPONSIBLE TOR THE [CLEANING OF [EYEBATHS UNTIL THE [PO&CSLEIN EYEBATHS [CAN BE CHANGED OUT [WITH MORE MODERN 1 1 [NON-BOWL DESIGNS. 1 1 1 11 [(MEG/JDK) 12/31/92. f----------------------------------- --------------------- ------------------------------------- -------------------- -------T-------- . -- --------------------- ---------+-------- * -- ------- ------------------ 110 * 39yd NGC 12568 G i uoa 3 2t? : 0 1 2S , I C\ ON 11-04-1992 07:44 3093649510 The BF Goodrich acc*ny Chanical Group Bwixcnmental Office R R. lf BOK 15 terry, XL 61537 FAX NO: 309-364-9510 P.01 DATE: // / 3 / 9*- TIME: raw: __ fCt$D________ IKWE: \ 3 < W ~9So ^ FACSTKTTJC mtfpg TCTITO TO: _ <j-/" *e / g. X- CCHPANY: ,,_________________________._________ FAX: _ (3J6J VV7-4/7? Total Fagoo sent: __________ ^(Including this aover latter). If all pages are rot received, please oontaot: et" sender at above number Q Barbara sandsrs 309-364-9405 a************************************** MESSAGE: ___Bo b , TL^r*______^_____________________________ lyaM-h____5 L r*vn iy 4^. ______ lit?2.________^ AuJl A________________________________ ..tiiAA ______ /j/i^.i/*?-2-____________________________________________________________ T4c- NOC 12569 11-04-1992 0?:44 3093649S10 P.02 AUDIT-PC 1.S1 Worksheet Pri*it*ch Inc. Coapenv: BFCOOORICH Facility: KERRY Pace: $ Session: 1 06-10-92 Revision: 0 10-26 -92 Svstea: 4 DRINKING WATER MANAGEMENT Category: RECOMMENDATIONS Dwg: QUESTION Ja; remarks ECOMMENDATIONS (BY ! COMMENTS ! 1. SAMPLING RESULTS WERE NOT REPORTED TO THE STATE WITHIN 30 DAYS. JPl \\ ;< 1 11 i* 11 1 11 ;j ft 1 14 'RRMUTF j JDMK;1. 11/92*. Tilt \ LaJjaLyticai/ ' 1 iremirehe/ts ` REQUl^Ur UNDER THE yt \ ULiiNohf public \ ; health/mpaRTMent i ; :ARE UXKGIUVXEKED 1 ; ;to determines. ; J CqrfpLlANCE (WK) i J ; nm/ia /o : THERE IS NO DOCUMENTATION HAT POTABLE WATER SYSTEM IS LEAD FREE". JPJ } ;` 1I \\ \; l* j l 4 1t 1 41 I :j !! s; ;; ; * ;j 14 :i 11 ;j ^I Ji GENERATE CCMEKTaIION MK;2. 11/92. NO RECORDS :are available to idetermine IF "LEAD ;FREE" SOLDER AND JF1UX HAS BEEN USED ;IK THE POTABLE VaTER 5 SYSTEM SINCE JUNE 119, 1986. A '.MONITORING PROCEDURE (WILL BE ESTABLISHED irOR LEAD IN THE '.potable water. NOTICE WILL RE ;POSTED FOR POSSIBLE HEAD CONTAMINATION UN DRINKING WATER. !PROCEDURES WILL BE !ESTABLISHED TO UNSURE THAT "LEaD ! FREE** PIPES. SOLDER jAND FLUX ARE USED l '.ALL FUTURE CHANGES !TO THE DB1NK1NC I WATER SYSTEM, tDHK) ',12/31/92. 3. THERE AS NO NOTIFICATION SPJ POSTED INFORMING PERSONNEL OF l [ THE LEAD CONTENT IN THE J: DRINKING WATER. | 4. the facility has not demonstrates that the water SYSTEM IS "LEAD FREE". 1I ;? :: !1 3. POST NOT1FICATIO DMK',3- SEE ABOVE ; 14 1J 4. ADDRESS |OHK!4. SEE ABOVE ;; *J ;s. non-potable water system isip; ;not labeled ;: S. LABEL iDMK!5. 11/82; A FLOW ; 1 DIAGRAM OF THE NOC 12570 11-04-1992 07:44 3093649510 IPGoodrieh P.03 4 ^ fve Vfa '" t~ k* 1UI> /4^iM __ Sg r:_ Of *0 6-4-JT m-Ao/ /.. li m ' f-f ^ i'ilOkJ 7 ')' \/Od- r~f c~cj A*" k) l*a.// i*>& 'V~T3 ft"7N /o /2-0 / -______________________________________A 9 ----1 <1^ 1 ?- ^ ____ C-Q ,-- l *- w- / - ^.k-A-flyx- .______________ NGC 12571