Document qdL3Ea8wdO0r8EZqLo6dbE1r5

Copy made 5/2/79. ROM ,(NAM C -- LO CATIO N-- PHONE) H. M. Keating - G4WA (4-8171) April 24, 1979 SU BJECT QSA - AGENT ORANGE REFERENCE TO mm\ D. R. Bishop - A3NB N. G. Higgins - G4NG W. J. McCarville - A3NC J. W. Molloy - 1740 G. Roush - A2SA J. J. Spano - G4NH * In response to your early April request, a Q&A is attached for use per Dr. McCarville*s memo of 4/24/79. The one word insert in question two and the last two Q&A's on page two were subsequently added by agreement with Dr. McCarville. If the QfiA does not satisfy your needs, please let me know. HMK:ku Attachment Confidential-Subject to Protective Order 01163 anto * / /*' * AM C -- L O O T (O H -- P H O N E I / r 5U Q JC C T REFERENCE w. J v McCarville - A3NB - 4-*32S7 April 24, 1979 Q&A - AGENT ORANGE W. G. KRUHMRICH PLANT Hr. D. R. Bishop Hr. H. M. Keating G4WA/ Dr. George Roush - A2SA Hr. M. C. Throdahl - DIB T O Mr. W. B. Papageorge - G4WA Attached is a preparedness Q&A on Agent Orange for internal use at W. G. Krummrich Plant. Questions from outside should be referred to Dan Bishop or myself. /hmv Attachment v W. J. cCarville Confidential-Subject to Protective Order v* April 24, 1979 Q&A re "Agent Orange" at/vJGKlInternal use only) Q: When did Monsanto make "Agent Orange" at WGK? A: "Agent Orange", which was a mixture of the n-butyl ester of 2,4-D and the n-butyl ester of 2,4,5-T, was supplied to the U.S. Government during the period 1965 through 1963. most Q: What is the material in "Agent Orange" that is''?toxic to humans? A: An impurity in the 2,4,5-T known as 2,3,7-, 8-tetrachlorodibenzo p-dioxin (2,3,7,8-TCDD). Q: How much 2,3,7,8 TCDD was in Monsanto's 2,4,5-T? A: We don't know for sure. There are more than 20 different tetrachloro dioxins possible, all of which analyze about the same, using the techniques we had available 10 years ago, but-only the 2,3,7,8 isomer has'been shown to be highly toxic.in animal studies.' Q: What are,the long-term effects of exposure to 2,3,7,8-TCDD? > A: There are no long-term health effects known in humans, but because of some recent studies in monkeys and earlier studies in mice and rats, the government has started a study to examine human exposures. - * Q: What is Monsanto doing to study workers exposed to 2,4,5-T? , , ,A: Although we have had experience with 2,4,5-T and presumably with 2 3 7 8-TCDD at Nitro dating back* t o .1949 , we have seen no long-term effects on health other than chlorahne. .Last summer'we agreed to take part in an independent study or Nitro employees carried out on behalf of the World Health Organization. Nitro was chosen because exposure levels believed to be many times what would be expected in the normal production and handling of 2,4,5-T were experienced in 1949 during a process accident. vSince even in the routine operations the exposure _.evels at the Nitro locarxon were believed to be considerably higher x han lvi>K.r w e hgJiRVP if is n e c e s s a r y tn rompl ara rV.-. g I T ^ o o n as `possible..'^ wnen We finish this study later in 1979. we will know whether there is any need to' expa-nd f-h,e study ' ^ y^ uf ' Confidential-Subject to Protective Order r"2, Q&A - Agent Orange - WGK Q: Why did Monsanto agree to the Nitro study last summer? A: Since the Nitro experience is the oldest recorded incident involving 2,3,7,8 TCDD and since it involved the largest exposed population (228) until the Seveso, Italy, episode in 1976, and also because we had not observed any long-term effects, the WHO believed that a detailed follow-up after 30 years might provide valuable information. 'At the time 'we agreed to the Nitro study, the "Agent Orange" question had not even been raised. Q: From the studies with monkeys, mice and rats what would you say is the possible effect on my health of my four years of exposure to contaminated 2,4,5-T? A; The only known human effect is chloracne. The purpose of the study at Nitro is to uncnvpr arty ntihnr long-term-of feet cu A / O ' T S<5-~ . of* Qi What has been the effect so fax on the exposed population at Seveso . Italy? A: The initial irritating effect caused some cases of chloracne* We are not aware of any other known effects. Confidential-Subject to Protective Order: