Document q30DBDg7y4e2LzE0znB2nkLDR

i&tvth 13, 1961 George J. Bolnea, M,D. 413 N, Broom Street Wilmington, Delaware (ftDear Doctor Eolnea: ;| l am reporting herewith the results of the analyses of the urine and blood of your patient The interpretation of the results I i JTw recorded on the report is ample in itself, but I think I should '^cOTuaent a little further on this situation, with particular reference to the alleged exposure of this patient to lead. rs t is conceivable that a chemist in a research or service laboratory in fhe petroleum industry might he subjected to a significant degree of Exposure to tetraethyl lead in the course of his work of carrying out instillations and like procedures, This has sever occurred, however, so v.-' . 'far as the record shows, and investigations mad from time to time in characteristic laboratories of this typo have failed to reveal any (----..evidence of any measurable occupational exposure to lead. It is not to ; j 1 be anticipated, therefore, that any such disease would occur. Certainly j would not, except under atrocious conditions of operation of the laboratory. {1 am not being critical of your investigation in this instance, but am merely describing the situation that exists in this industry.) .With respect to the clinical aspects of tetraethyllead poisoning, where jit actually exists, X wish to point out to you that fch finding of /hematological abnormalities is not even vaguely suggestive of exposure / to or absorption of tetraethyllead. The metabolic behavior of this compound in the body is such that there are never any hematological _ changes in association with its absorption. Stippling, anemia, reticuloeytosia, polycythemia, and an increase in the production of hemic and urinary porphyrins fit into th picture of inorganic lead poisoning but are completely absent in tetraethyllead poisoning. This disease always involves the central nervous system, never the blood or the blood forming tissues. In view of the fact that the findings in your case are wholly negative, with respect to evidence of the absorption of lead, this information may, perhaps, be regarded as irrelevant, but it seemed to mm that I should point out these facts. I may suggest that the potential exposure to mercury of which you have spoken may have been significant. It is unlikely (if the exposure has bees eliminated completely) that exposure to rxrcuxy which ms terminated in in will be a*d apparent by analysis of the urine at this time (this is not tbe sane problem aa that of lead because of the relatively rapid. George J. Boines, M.D. 2 March 13. 1981 loss of mercury from the body) but if there is any suspicion of a continuing source of exposure to mercury, the urine might well be examined for mercury. Incidentally, unless the method of analysis is very good indeed, mercury will not be found in samples of urine of small volume. I am not impressed, therefore, by the negative results which you report in the absence of knowledge of the analytical method employed in determining the presence and the Quantity of mercury. This is a microchemical procedure which requires a high degree of precision for its proper conduct. Cordially yours. RAK: ss Enclosure Lee H. Miller, M.D. Robert A. Kehoe, M. D * f THE KETTERING LABORATORY COLLEGE OF MEDICINE 3DETT AID 3ETHESDA AVENUES CIHCI'n-TATI 19, OHIO March *1 n 1961 To: Dr. George J. Eoires )j .13 N. Broon Street Hilnington 99, Delaware For: P.einbursenent of The Kettering Laboratory for the analysis of the urine and blood of .'or the de teraination of lead, 2 Analyses at 312.50 each ;)2500 K 0 u i a i N13238.01 The Kettering Laboratory is a totally self-supported research unit of the University of Cincinnati engaged in research in the fields of industrial hygiene and medicine,. The Laboratory is not a medical serviclaboratory, and clinical diagnostic services, as such, are not performed We do undertake to assist physicians with toxicologic problems or other special problems in this and related fields, as a courtesy, when adequate facilities are not available locally,. We shall make every effo to be of assistance provided that we can obtain the information we requi and if the work that is to be done will yield, in#our opinion, informati that will be helpful in establishing a diagnosisin the management of a case, in teaching, or in contributing to a better understanding of physiologic or pathologic mechanisms. NO SPECIMEN WILL BE. ACCEPTED FOR ANALYSIS UNLESS PRIOR ARRANGEMENTS HAVE EEEN MADE BY THE ATTENDING OR OTHER RESPONSIELE~PHYSICIAfrWTTHT" ~~ PHYSICIAN IN THE KETTERING LABORATORY. This is necessary for a number of reasons. First, uqless proper specimens are collected with specified care, in specially processed containers, and in adequate amounts, they are likely to be contaminated or unsuitable for analysis. Second, we must be sure that we are aware of pertinent historical facts and clinica findings since we provide frequently interpretations of the results. Third, our staff members must frequently revise work schedules on sponsored research in order to carry out the analysis. The Laboratory makes a charge for reimbursement of the actual cost of the service performed, since otherwise funds earmarked for research will be expended for medical service. Deviation from this policy is mad when patients'are indigent or when the cost of the' service would cause undue economic hardship. Therefore, it is requested that the attending physician assist us by marking the appropriate line on the reverse side of this form. HE o o x a i i c N13238.02 THE KETTERING LABORATORY COLLEGE OP MEDICINE, UNIVERSITY OP CINCINNATI EDEN AND EE THESDA AVENUES CINCINNATI 19, OHIO INSTRUCTIONS; ffiPORE PROCEEDING PLEASE READ THE REVERSE SIDE OF THIS FORM. The i n form at-1 on required below is of major importance for "tHe"performance of the service that you have re.quested0 FAILURE TO COMPLETE THIS SECTION OF THE FORM FULLY will result In delay in carrying out both the" 'analysis~and the" subsequent interpretation (where applicable) of the results,. Please PRINT or TYPE. 2i)u..IL.3>tn Sfcji&lmingfcon.................................2._ Delaware__ Address City Zone State- Race W Sex M Age 29 Indigent Private X Other _____________ Hospital? Name ...Bf o osiaad., Caaa&mL-Jli:a. .wilmingLQXi______Dels&are- Address City Zone State Re que sted by; 5-g-r-, -fiaorge. Name J4LinesTsaarHe3 N. ss Rrnnm pf-.. Jillmingfcon City 99 Delaware Zone State Bill? Doctor _____ Hospital _____ Other patient Send Report to g Doctor X Hospital _____ Other _________ tajgjjfclgation Desired ; .Lead, content. of-blood and urine History; Include nature of exposure, actual time of exposure if known or surmised, and especially the last day or hour of exposure; character and time of onset of illness; course of illness and present status; previous pertinentmedical history. Patient is a chemist working for the Gulf Researcn Developing Co. at Philadelphia. Working there from Aug. 12, 1957 to Feb. 21,61. He was away from work June to Nov. 21, 1960, when he visited his family in Greece. He was constantly exposed to Lead in tetra ethyl gasoline analytical work, Sulfides, Hydrocarbons, Crude oils, and mercury fumes. The Mercury fumes exposure was from Feb. to June 1960 when in was discovered that mercury had oeen accidentally spilled in certain hidden areas in the lab. However urine specimen: tested in some of the other persons in the lab were negative.Patient is currently asymptomatic; hehad a cold about one month ago. During preemployraent examination Physical Findings; rfor a opoossifitciioon imn a laboratory dealing with radio-isotopes. his blood platelets were found to be 104,000'; 119,000; and 126,000 by different hospital laboratories. There is no history of recent immunization, no bleeding tendency, anemia, or purpuric rash. Skin is clear, scle&CL.clear, mouth & tongue negative, and no adenopathy. Spleen and liver not enlarged; kidneys normal. Pertinent. Laboratory Findings; Blood smears showed 22 stippled cells in 50 fields, and on another examination b}^ the hematologist blood smears snowed 1-2% sti^linr Hemogram showed 6,500,000 r.b.c.; 13.5 gms hgb; 90%; w.b.c 8,100; sgs. 48; lymp 46 Itonos 4: Eos. 2; Baso. 2.; Reticulocytes 0.9%; L.E. preparation negative. Bone J5PiLR4i_2E-,0 marrow study : No diagnostic abnormality. Other studies non contributo Impression: Thalassemia Minor with Polycythemia of microcytes.Possible Lead toxem Treatment-; Specify medications and dates of institution and completion of c" therapy. No therapy of any kind has been given. Because of the low platelets, and the stippling it is considered important to eliminate the possibility of lead intoxication since he was exposed to it. Blood has been zent to U. of Pa. for starch gel electrophoresis. ^ine amLb3fod collected in my presence & according,'your suggestions were mailec Wicoctay. Tnank mypju,3*jeerrvy mmuucchh ffroa-rr vyromu-rr tkinrdrxe,i ,, . Sincerely, 4. . v/' \ H February 28, 1961 George J. Boines, M.D. 413 N. Broom Street Wilmington, Delaware Dear Doctor Boines: I am sending to you one kit containing two tubes for duplicate samples of. blood and one spot sample of urine, together with instructions for collecting tho samples. Please follow the instructions with meticulous care. We must also have, as requested on the enclosed information sheet, the necessary information about your patient - be sure to describe the exposure, its duration and, above all, the last day of exposure. It is essential, for diagnostic purposes, that the patient should not be undergoing therapy with EBATHAMIL disodium calcium in any close time relationship to the analytical investigation. You should delay 3uch therapy until after the samples have been taken, or if such therapy has been initiated, you should wait for at least two weeks, preferably three, before taking the samples. We are not prepared to send containers ia excess of immediate needs, and therefore, I am not filling your request for extra containers. We cannot afford to have them scattered about the country, and only one set is required for diagnostic purposes. The charge made for these analyses is $12.50 for the blood (we analyse two samples in parallel, and charge as though they were one), and $12.50 for the urine. This is not a fee but merely the reimbursement of the actual cost to us of doing the job. This is not a diagnostic laboratory and we do not enter into this kind of work except as a courtesy to our colleagues or for purposes of our own information. Usually we are consulted about the clinical problem before undertaking any analyses, but l do not wish to delay your efforts and, therefore, I send the containers without advance information. Please follow my instructions, for we will not perform the analyses unless the samples are satisfactory in every way. Cordially yours. RAK:ss cc: Dr. Lee Miller Robert A. Xehoe, M.D N13238.03 GEORGE J. BOINES, M. D. 413 N. BROOM STREET WILMINGTON. DELAWARE February 24,1961 Dr. Robert Kehoe The Kettering Laboratories {University of Cincinnati Cincinnati, Ohio Dear Doctor Kehoe: I have an adult, white, male patient who has symptoms of lead intoxication. I would like to have three tubes for blood specimens and one doaen lead-free bottles for urine specimens. Please mail them to my post office Box 1853. What does your laboratory charge for these examinations? Any special instructions you have for our laboratory to follow in preparing these specimens would be greatly appreciated. Thanking you very much, I am Sincerely yours, GJB/mb Kt 001 N13238.04