Document ppYDjMOv03Y0xDXbpkn40kywX

-M---o--n--s:-a--n--t-o-- X>S%OTr2SCr3?3S XUfSXJRJWSrCS MATSHXAIi S KON3AKTO COVERAGE litigation O' iiwua*--coc*tio""*w**i C. A. Sweets - SC. Louis A3SA (2664)______ .______________ umijtcr * t March 2, 1981 J. F. Hussey C. Roush TO D.' R.' Bishop '} Cl C. Rankey ' Z'b not sure what Che approach should be as Co Che employee communications George Roush is (again) recommending. Personally, I feel Chere is a balance poinc somewhere between celling employees "all we know about all substances" and keeping them attuned to specific concerns of which ve (Honsanto management) decide they should be aware. I have no argument against a fully explanation of PCB's and employee exposure to them within Monsanto. As a matter of fact, X am such an employee. On the other hand, Roy "Red" Hall was/is exposed to hundreds of substances as an employee and union safety committeeman at Krumarich. Giving him all we know about all of them is going to be self-defeating. Would you two gentlemen recommend a practical approach which George Roush, John Hussey and _ .tight consider? George prefers (demands) a broad effort. I support a more specific (narrow) approach. X would like you experts to conciliate, so we can sort out a proper (or at least an approved) corporate effo . QQjZsC,----------- -- - C. A. Sweets /gme P.S. While Corporate Personnel is delighted to see the Monsanto Student Loan Program promoted, the EPS Monthly Report struck me as an odd place to publicize it. f DEPOSITION* | EXHIBtir Joush HCO 0216125 >-3 H m O S ij > s3 Z s>-3 (13XP1 OH1)_ C> W c fZ X MO HH KH3 o_ nn >n *e* :s HH H Xn -3 W Swh rCM/J nc ocw 3wzH PI Otw>* 53 J J J J WATER PCB-SD0000025388