Document ppKvK0qEXGdYrBOGgoB2d61B6
FILE NAME: Union Carbide (UC)
DATE: 0000
DOC#: UC174
DOCUMENT DESCRIPTION: Newspaper Article - Asbestos Recognized as Cancer Risk
UNION CARBIDE CORPORATION
270 PARK AVENUE, NEW YORK, N. Y. 10017
ASBESTOS TOXICOLOGY REPORT
It has been known for many years that seme persons working in asbestos production were prone to develop a disabling lung disease. In time, this condition became known as asbestosis and was related to exposure to high concentrations of asbestos dust. With further experience? i^was found that men could work with asbestos without development of lung disease if dust concentrations were kept below a certain level. It is now gen erally accepted that a man can work a 40-hour week for a lifetime without developing asbestosis if the asbestos dust particle count is kept at or
"J1!" wUiQParticlea P*r cubic fot o air. This dust concentration
of 5 million particles per cubic foot of air is the Threshold Limit Value for asbestos, and no cases of asbestosis are known to have occurred when exposures have been maintained at or below this level, despite large-scale utilization (now approaching one million tons per year in the U.SA.). This concentration of dust is generally not visible In the average work area unless a beam of light causing a Tyndall effect is present. Usually the dust concentration must be from 8-10 million particles per cubic foot before its presence is visible in average lighting conditions.
.. Several years ago, it was reported that there was an increase in the incidence of cancerous tumors, especially of the lung, associated with asbestosis. Recently there have been reports of some cancers occurring in individuals exposed to asbestos dust, but who have not developed clinical asbestosis. It is believed by most authorities that these cases have been associated with exposures significantly exceeding the Threshold Limit Value. A major manufacturer of asbestos products who also mines asbestos has not been able to show an increase in cancerous growths in men working where dust concentrations were maintained at the Threshold Limit Value.
Control of asbestos dust exposure is therefore necessary. The
control methods are the standard ones applicable to a variety of dusty
operations. They include closed flow systems, wet processes where possible,
and adequate exhaust ventilation where openings in the system are
necessary. Pelletizing is sometimes used to improve the handling character-
5 5 " r W ,l # e d u s t y " t e r i a l s . Where satisfactory containment to stay
Wiw ? i th*
Limit Value is impractical or impossible, efficient and
reliable respirators are available for the protection of the employee. A
program of environmental monitoring Is highly desirable to determine that
Threshold Limit Values are not being exceeded. In paper manufacturing, it
would be desirable to know the dust concentrations where the asbestos is
dumped from bags into the pulp slurry. Concentrations should also be
determined where dusting occurs in finishing products. While initial dust
determinations should be made at frequent intervals, once the level has
been established as satisfactory, the frequency may be extended to
occasional tests to assure continuation of a satisfactory condition.
UCC 023543
-2
Pre-employment ar>d periodic physical examinations of workers are desirable. These should include chest X-rays to insure that the worker
has no chest condition prior to work with asbestos and to determine that no lung changes are resulting from work with asbestos.
i
I-t is believd that the addition of asbestos at the proposed
levels during the manufacture of paper products would be harmless to the
consumer. Total dusting would have to be well in excess of any levels
acceptable to the consumer for the asbestos concentration to approach the Threshold Limit Value.
In conclusion, while asbestos dust in excess of the Threshold Limit Value is potentially harmful, as are many other dusts encountered in industry, it is as readily controlled as other such dusts and it can be used safely with appropriate precautions.
Carl U. Dernehl, M. D . . Director of Toxicology
K. S. Lane, M. D, Assistant Director of Toxicology
UCC 023544