Document pp5Rvvm8Keee2MywvznQp2R96

UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH PITTSBURGH, PENNSYLVANIA 15261 J-mthttsi,, iu*l lJJa lUrclx 12, 1974 yr. Ronald Mullinix P.O. Box,4455 Louisville, Kentucky 40204 Dear Mr. Mullinix, Ibis* is to acknowledge your vary detailed reply to my letter. This was most helpful. As of now, and since this is entirely exploratory and I do hot know whether any significance can be attached to this initial observation, I would prefer just to gather the facts from the workers themselves and then proceed. You mentioned three to five persons with skin lesions. First, I would like them to write to me as you did - let me know whether they had skin cancer or what type of lesions. If you do contact them, please be very careful not to make any assumptions about any relationship to work exposure. That is what I am trying to explore and it is very difficult. Nevertheless, your observation is worth pursuing. Si"n2cproly yours, Thomas P. Mancuso, m.D. 12a. Reaoarch Professor Occupational Health Graduate School of Public Health BFG23437 (.' *_ *V!rV JL'-'T'T v 'T'T* ,^/|,T\ j t sy<v fv/.^?yyfy>y vygfyy NEWS v,^ BULLETIN HEALTH NEWS There have been several rumors that Indicate there are other cases that have been diagnosed as angiosarcoma other than those previously mentioned. These rumors are false. There have been no other cases diagnosed as angiosarcoma* Further testing and evaluation is continuing. Certain employees have been hospitalized for further testing but there have been no Other finding^ of angiosarcoma, March 20, 1074 Industrial Relations Department 22985002 BFG23438