Document pmBqj0qbRVE0VNGZOJVmrMo9k

DIVISION OF POMOLOGY R IC H A R D W E L L IN G T O N , CHIEF IN RESEARCH H . B . T U K E Y , C H IEF IN RESEARCH R . C . C O L L IS O N . C H IEF IN RESEARCH F . E . G L A D W IN . ASSOCIATE IN RESEARCH G . H - H O W E , ASSOCIATE IN RESEARCH G . P . V A N E S E L T IN E , ASSOCIATE IN RESEARCH L . C . A N D E R S O N , ASSOCIATE IN RESEARCH G . L . S L A T E , ASSOCIATE IN RESEARCH B . R . N E B E L , ASSOCIATE IN RESEARCH J . D . H A R L A N , ASSOCIATE IN RESEARCH O L A V E IN S E T , ASSISTANT IN RESEARCH L . M . V AN A L S T Y N E , ASSISTANT IN RESEARCH K . D . B R A S E , ASSISTANT IN RESEARCH Dr. Robert A. Kehoe Medical College University of Cincinnati Cincinnati, Ohio NEW YORK STATE AGRICULTURAL EXPERIMENT STATION GENEVA, N. Y. U . P . H e d r ic k , d ir e c t o r P . J . P A R R O T T . VICE-DIRECTOR February 20, 1957 j t Dear Dr. Kehoe: Recently I noted in the Northwest Fruit Grower an article by Professor Talbot of Missouri on the "Spray Residue Hoax." In this article he calls attention to your studies. Have you any publication on the subject that you could send me? Personally I have been rather skeptical about arsenioc and lead poisoning. For 50 years I have been testing fruit that has been thoroughly sprayed and I have never used any precaution in removing the spray residue. In my Division there are a number of others who have pursued a similar course, and as far as I can Judge, no one has suffered from poisoning. Yours very truly, RW B KE A A Uv <> U r? o a 4 N 7963