Document peq44BNerNmmQvemQvg19w7pB

PLAINTIFF'S EXHIBIT GF-880 i- -1.. -J . - % - .* .... - : ..Wn-w./'-vv:?v-v".' udyi s the sirs stats Drsra::? caret ?ca the iastsb asisicr if T2s iastsh .tdicta:. ctstsic? if usscst:. SSTSSS TEHi:, 1934. PUurtirr. ;:a. 11241 S, SC.. 4 corporation, tad THE S232CS CS^AST, t corporation. Olr. So. 2*fnd*n*d. , SEPARATE ..S-T3 IT ISSTATT TTSSTT. SC. C^. IT" f| //T. f-V (si? A-*r< W--- is rsr csirsj states oistjict cocst tcr 12s eastss 3I7TSI02 CF SAS332 .'S3ICIU. iisinir :f "ISSCTRI. SEPTSiSER II23. 1334. ALZLUrOO. S-ITE, ?iai=tirr, *. E7Z5ITIT. 33., a corporation, ud THE 5DSSU3ID CC'JPAHT. a. corporation, ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) \ Dofandsoti. ' So, 11241 Olv. So. SEPARATE ASSTS OF DXFESOAi? EES SU3E20I3 GffigAST, Sow coaos Ths Rubroid Cospsny, on* of tha aaura -,aad da- ftndants, ud, for its iranti iowr to plaintiff* 1 patition filod harain, daaiaa aaoh ud ovary allajation La laid petition aoatsinad ud set forth. Tnmtrmirg hnvia* fully uumrtd, this d#f*nd*nt prays to bo homo dlaehargad with its costa. jilt* s/UliiM I _ ^ttororys ior 3afanout iha lucoroid Company.  :I :t a S X:- 7Ulag Of Petition - --....................................................... Pstitioa -- ----- -- .................................................. Susmoas to Stariff of Si. Louis ------Sheriff's Baturas tharaoa ---------erotica, petltlaa and Bond Tar donora.1, filed Mot lea------------ ------- --- -------------------------- --Haaoral Patltloa - -- -- -- -- -- -- -- Baaoral Boad ----------------Baaoral Order ---------------Motloa for Costa --------------Certificate---------------- - ------------------- - -----------3111 of Coats ---------------- i i 5 s 7 3 9 U. 12 1* 15 ia t--T t OMNDANTS 1 OHWT L- i r -1 i ki' ) SfAZZ 07 MISSOURI ) ( ss. ciit o? sr. louis ) BS 17 HBCEOZH2D, mat heretofore, to-wtt: on the fourteenth <Uf of Nowemher, Nineteen Hundred ui fiirt7-faur, there m filed la ilia offlca of the Clarlc of Circuit Court of the City of St. Louis, within and Tor tha Cit7 sad Stars aforesaid, a petition la Causa .To. 206312, Sarlaa *3" of tat oausas la said Court, wherein Alexander Salth, Is plaintiff and Tternit, lae., a Corporation and The Suberold Coapanj, a Corporation, i- -i.'V'iant. Tie said petition is In words and figures, as follows, ta-eit: ST123 0? MISSOURI ) ( S3. CITT 0? ST. LOUIS ) 3 TS2 CIRCUIT COURT QT 32 CUT 07 S7. LOUIS STAT2 07 MISSOURI ALEXANDER SMITH, ) Plaintiff, e. ) DamageSuit ETSRITIT, EIC., a Corporation and THE RUBEROEJ COM?ANT, A Corporation, Oefandanta ) 1 petition ' Plaintiff atates mat me defendants are corporations and as sued are engaged in me sanufaoture of mingles and operate a faotory or plant in the Cit7 of St. Louis, Hisaour1 and as siai were at all tiase dare in mentioned engaged ia a Mis or preesee mind angst prodsee 111 naee or disease jaaalter te t&e wort ar peeeeee eat wblsa subReeled emplorees to ma danger of lllneaa or disease ineident to sued sent, trade or proaaaa, ta wit, me manfastue of stoaglee. Plaint iff further wastes tnat be estared tbe eeplor of tbe defendanta In April, 1924 and remised ia tbs espisr of me defendants until on or about tho 3rd day of sa-veaber, 1333 and that during the entire time of bln employment by the defendants b iu engaged u a labarar at defendant* < plant or place of business In the City of St. Louis, XIas our 1 and as suoh was required to assist m various ys is tbs zanufaotura of shinglae. Plaintiff furthar atatas that la said work, trada or procaaa in watch the daftndanta vara engaged vast quaatitlaa of duat would ba emit tad Into the atmosphere; that plaintiff was required to breaths Into hi* lungs said duat; that said dust partlelaa ooatalnad sllloataa, lima, fraa silica, aabastoa and oarbon, whieh partlelaa wars injurious to da haalth of parsons so breathing said duat; and that as a direst result of tbs aagllgana# and earalassnaaa of tba defendants as bareleaftar aantlooad, plaintiff was caused to suffer Hisses or disease vblcb will ba barainaftar aora particularly described. One, tba defendants in tba conduct of said business operated Twrioua aaohins*, blowers, boppars, ebutas and grind ers wbicb while being operated caused Test quantities of dust to ba emitted Into tba atmosphere and did negligently and care lessly fall and amltto provide each and every such anchins nth a hood connected with a blower or auction fan of sufficient power to earry off said duat and prevent Its inhalation by the employees there, all in violation of the lava of tba state of Missouri than and thera in full force and effect, being Seotlon 13224 of the Sevissd Statutaa of Missouri, 1929. Too, that said rk and assofas taring in wftbah dsf--dmmta --re eogMpsd ma a aocfc vbisa eemld produce illness or ilaaooa peoallar to me verm or fossae smrriad am there, and that tba defendants aareleeaiy and negligently failed to adapt aad provide approved and affaetlvo dovuae, means nr aetbsds for the jreveatiaa of maw--and o--pmtioaal 4la-- me idaat to sown work all is violation of tba law >U of Via State of Missouri then ad there la full force end effect be lag Scotian 12232 of tht. aevised Statues, 1329. Three, tie defendants carelessly and negligently tad la rialatloa of lav failed aad omitted to provide work ing alothing to be used exclusively hr e*eh employee aad did negligently aad carelesalr and la violation of lav fall to provide adequate and approved respirators without aost to the employees and failed aad omitted to require employees to eear such respirators while engaged la said worm ell la riolatloa of the lavs of the State of Missouri than and there la full fores tad effeet, being Seotloa 12234 of the Sensed Statue# of Missouri, 1929. Jour, the defeadaata carelessly aad negligently . sad la riolatloa of lav failed aad omitted to cause plaintiff, while engaged la said work as aforesaid, to be examined by a compsteat, licensed aad reputable phyelslaa one# every calendar month for the purpose of ascertaining If say occupational or Industrial disease existed la plaintiff, ell la riolatloa of the lave of the Statv of Missouri than end there la full force end effect being Sections 12252 and 12255 of the Sensed Statutes of 1929. firm, the defendants carelessly end negligently la violation of lav failed to provide end mlntain adequate and afflclent facilities for ths carrying off of all Injurious dusts all In riolatloa of ths lavs of tha Stats of Missouri than and t&ere la full force aad effect, bclag Section 12280 of the Sensed Statutes, 1929. Six, ths defendants carelessly aad aagHgastly aad la r lain turns of lav filed aad united to grew Us all ftoppem, lyenta m tenon tm tao gmrpaao of dming ney fraa the eaployovo aaxieve, poisonous or Injurious dusts and failed to men dart sad rvfuao laaldomt to auod sort from the floors, all la riolatloa of the lan ef tha Stats of Missouri then la run ferw aad effort, being Seatinn 12282 of the 3ewia*d Statutes of Missouri, 1,329. 3*w#n, td# defendants negligeatl7 a ad oareleaelr ud La violation or la* fa Had and omitted to post m aaoasp'.. .--ia.;- .o* in avar7 work room where tde mu work u carried on, aotloes of td* caown dangers to td* d**ltd or td* inpioyaea arising from sued work or process toga tier with similar laatrustions as to tie down aaaos or avoiding the same, Ln type sumo lent to 0# e*all7 readable although td# darendaat knew or b7 td# exercise or ordlaar7 oar* would daws . down are dangers and injurious effects ecoompanrlng td# said process, all in rloiatlon or td* laws or tde 3tat* or Missouri tdaa and tdara in full force and effect, being 3eotioa 12264 of td* Harriaed statutes, 1929. light, tda defendants earelaaalr and aagllgentl7 and in Tiolatloa of la* failed and omitted to rantllata said plant so aa to reader daroleee so far as practicable all tde duete and otder impurities generated in said sanufaoturing proeees died 3S7 be injurious to tde health of the" eaplojeee all in islatioa of tda lava of tda State of Missouri, then and there in full force and effect, being Section 12284 of td* Bawiied Statues of Missouri. 1929. Mine, tde defendants carelesslf end aegligentlf failed and omitted to ezerels* ordinar7 oars to provida plain tiff vltd a reaaonablf safe place ln vdled to work in that noxious dusts were generated in said sanufaatur* vdisd wden taken into td* lunga would produce lllnasa or disease and td* defendants oareleeelr and aegligsatly failed td provide plain tiff *itd a ruftwtst or asm* t paawamt tda ladalatiaa ef sa id dust tr u preelde UMtte, rams or eeaSuater* fer tda purpose of mowing said dust &oa td# plant and from tde aae&inee tasrw. .* S Plaintiff further states that as a dlraot result of tda negligence and carelssanss* of tda defendants aa aforesaid, plaintiff n< permitted aad asked aad required to eork under tda olreuaataaoaa aforesaid; tdat da vaa eauaad to breaths into dis lungs noxious, harmful asd poisonous duata; and tfcnt aaid dusts contained harmful partial** aforesaid; tdat as a dirert result tdareof plaintiff eaa caused to con trast sllleoala, aebeatosis, pneumoooalosis, tuberculosia, bronchitis, peribroandltia aad dla aatlre system eaa weakened and dissipated; tdat dls lungs ears taflammad and iafaotad; tdat da was eauaad to auffar eltd loss of walgdt; and a saeara aougd; tdat da eaa eaused to sustain a fibrosis of tda laags; tdat tda fudotloa aad use of dls lungs and all parts tdareof are seriously impaired; weakened aad disturbed aad tdat da das been rendered incapable of resistlag any disease; tdat as a dlreot result tdareof plaintiff's Ufa das baaa sdortaaad; tdat da das lost dls vagas aad aarolags as a laborsr at tda rata of |3.dO par day aad in tda future da will loss tda same until da dies; tdat da daa baeoma obligated for aadteal aid aad attaatioa In tda sum of $100.00 to data and in tda future da will be re quired to obligato dins elf for additional sums for aadleal aid and attantlon; tdat all of said injuries are sarloua and per* sonant end tr-j function and use of dls respiratory aystam das bsan Impaired, limited and randarad painful and tdat plaintiff das suffered and will in tda future suffer grant pain of tda body and mind all to his injury and damage la tda sum of TVSHTT TSOCSilfD nnT.Ti.ra {$20,000.00) for eniod sum together with dla eoata plain tiff prays judgdant against tda defendant*. Ittarnsye for Plaintiff OOTNOANT'S Ojoa tbo filiag of said potitioa writ of ouazocs far otmeo upoa tbs dofoadsats m lsouod by ts* Clark of sold Court, dlraotod to tbo Sboriff of tbo City of 3t. Louio, which writ of otunnoas sad Shoriff'o returas thorooa *r rspootiToly la wrds sad figures-, u fallows, to-wit; 3TATS 0? MI3S0CTI ) ( ss Cl7 Of St. Louis ) T2S ST1T3 07 MSSOCai, To tbo Shariff of tbo Clt7 af St. Loula--Crestisg; V* a organ d you to siassoa - iso., s Corpora tion, sad Tbs Bubsrold Coapoay, * corporation to spposr boforo tbo Judges of our Clroult Court, on tbs first day of tbo best tors tbtroof, to bo bold La tbo City of St. Louis, ot tbo Clril Courts Buildlag. 12tb tad Markst Stroots, oa tbo first Monday of CZC. coxt, tboa sad tboro to saswor tbo eoaplaiat of Xlssaador 3aith so sot forth la tbo aaasxsd pstltloa; sad bats Tou tboa sad tboro this writ: Titso so 7QSN SCEIOLL, Clork of our sold Court, with tbo sool tbaroof boroto sffarad, st offloo la tbs Clt7 of 3t. Louis, tbls 14th dsf of Sottabor, la tbo roar of our Lord, also. (57JX) toon bundrod sod thirty-four. John 3ehaollClark Sorrod this writ la tbo Clt7 of 3t* Louis, Missouri, oa tba witila oaasd dsfsadaat tbs ftsrall ~ii--i poo o rsi (s sarparmtios. Quo ista day of Soroabsr, 1>M by 4 ai-irorise * soar of tao writ sad potitis* as fmiibod by tao Clark to XSsa Tro^s 3ss'y of iso said dsfsadant oarpacatloa, bs baiag la said dsforiOasts uaal susiasss offiso sad la *amrg tbaroof. Tbo Prootdsnt or otbor caiof st t&o ttao of owrriso. .\ *1 7 *'*.** Tv Thsaas -t, Madden 37 Carl Class ^Sheriff 2aput7 I further serred this art? la the CI?7 of 3t. Louis, Missouri, oa the etthia nased defasdaac the Buberold Ccspaay (a oorporatioa) this 19th day of ^creober, 1924, by deliverlag a eapy of the art? as furnished by the Claris to Idas Tracpe of the said dafaodaae Corporation, ba being la said defendants usual busiaasa office and la charge thereof. The President or other Chief officer of said Defendant eould aot be fouad la the CI77 of St. Louis at the tlae of service. fee's $3.00 Thsaas a. Madden By Carl Class Sir riff, Deputy. lad at the September Ten, 1924, the following furtbar proceedings were had la said cause, to-vit; frlday, .Vavesber 30, 1924. 11ereader Smith, ) -vs-209313-B. { Bteralt lao., et al. ) Oefendaata' notice, petition aad boad for ressrsl filed. The said aotlee, petltloa and bond of defendants far reaoeal of turn sailm to the JJlatanat Court of the doited dMtw far tha tarsara Btnaioa of tha testers. judicial District of xiaanorl are rwwpeotive ly la words aad figures aa follows, to-it: