Document peM2YgjeVDVjZ91m0Qe1r6v2j
May 25, 194?
Br. Mary M. Maher, Remington Arms Company, Bridgeport, Connecticut.
Bear Dr- Maher:
The results on
show a satisfactory drop (blood;,
indicating that tn^actualquantity of lead adsorbed by her
vas relatively small. The result on the urine is more in
keeping with the blood lead concentration than it wa3 formerly.
To my surprise the urinary results on^HHH^^K do not seem
to have demonstrated the severity of hei^Kac^eSposure. The results on the blood are in keeping with the lead line and the presence of suggestive symptoms and blood changes. It is cer tainly rare to see aucn a discrepancy between the blood and urine. It will probably be worth while to watch the progress of this woman carefully and perhaps to check her again.
Cordially yours,
RAK ef Enc.
Robert A. Itehoe, M. D.
(a b 6i 66)
Samples of. urine and blood received from an employee of the Remington Arms Company, Bridgeport, Connecticut, for lead analyses*
Urine
Analysis Number = J4.3A-I772
Volume
= 75 ml*
Mg. Pb/Liter = O.O35
Blood
Analysis Number = 1}_3A-1775
Spectrographic
Grams
13*1
Mg. Pb/100 g,
O.O85
Dithizone 13.2 0.09
KE 0018525
Samples Received: 5~20-4|.3 Samples Reported: 5~22~l\3
N19688.01
Samples of urine and blood received from an employee of the Remington Arms Company, Bridgeport, Connecticut, for lead analyses*
Urine
Analysis Number = li-3A-177U
Volume
= 38 ml.
Mg. Pb/Liter =0.11
Blood
Analysis Number = 1^3A-1775
Spectrographlc
Grams
9*55
Mg. Pb/100 g. "
0.06
Dithizone 12.6 0.055
0018526
Samples Received: Samples Reported:
5-20-10
5-22-1+3