Document pe9knvOZkDKqDKJgGkxb0636B

(Drislane - Purcell) 233 1 which is clearly very vague. Because he doesn't really 2 appear to have much of an independent recollection of much of 3 this. And then you come back to the document. Why don't you 4 just show him the document first and ask questions about the 5 document. It doesn't seem fair to the witness. 6 MR. PURCELL: I'm being exceedingly fair to the 7 witness and your record is noted and I will be happy to 8 proceed. 9 BY MR. PURCELL: 10 Q Sintered metals as a possible alternative to 11 asbestos, I want to be clear if I understand, when you 12 believed that that specific material was being considered as 13 an alternative to asbestos? 14 MR. FRIESTEDT: Objection to form. 15 A I don't think it was ever really being considered 16 as an alternative to asbestos in passenger car and light 17 truck brake linings or anything like that. Sintered metal is 18 what went into the sintered -- semimetallic -- I'm sorry; the 19 cerametallic material that I was talking of earlier. That's 20 sintered metals. Those are powdered metals, coppers, iron 21 powders, lead perhaps, stuff like that. 22 Q Do you see in the attached excerpt from the Annals 23 of Occupational Hygiene dated January 1970 the indication A.S.E. Reporting Service (518) 458-1091