Document pe2Xyj5O0VBpQJrKvL5ZvnmO7

si? X"* THE SOCIETY OF THE PLASTICS INDUSTRY. INC. t 250 PARK AVENUE NEW YORK. NEW YORK 10017 212/687-2675 ( ---- t 4^ L-xVv fa Hay 6, 1974 14 <"' > y TO: MEMBERS OF THE VINYL MONOMERS AND PVC PRODUCERS AD HOC COMMITTEE Gentlemen: The attached questionnaire is an attempt to gather some data which could be used in a presentation at OSHA hearings on a permanent standard for vinyl chloride monomer. The basic concept is that there are many polymerization and monomer plants in which there have been no cases of angiosarcoma. We must show that significant numbers of people are involved and that these people have been exposed long enough for the disease to become evident. We must also try to show what degrees of severity of exposure occurred in these opera tions. We must at least derive the implication that 1WA exposure levels were at least 50 ppm and possibly higher. Since we do not know when a permanent standard will issue, we must plan for the worst and handle this like a ,,crash,,_prograBcr> Please try to complete this form and return it to SPI offices by May 15, 1974 at the latest. Cordially, Thomas J. McGrath Director of Packaging Services TJM/nm att. 23280001  L THE SOCIETY OF THE PLASTICS INDUSTRY. INC. 250 PARK AVENUE NEW YORK. NEW YORK 10017 - 212/687-2675 QUESTIONNAIRE ON VINYL CHLORIDE EXPOSURE Exposure Levels: 1. Odor of vinyl chloride monomer present throughout much of the day. From years________ ~_______ to_________"___________ . 2. Odor of VCM present occasionally during the work day. From years1 ^ L* toI "73. 3. Odor of VCM a rare event in any work day. From yearsI <3 ~7 ^ to__________________ ________ 4. Have there been process or processing changes introduced which have resulted in an increased escape of VCM. List years when these occurred. 5, Have there been process or processing changes introduced which have resulted in a reduction in the escape of VCM. List years when these occurred. _________________________________ 6. Do you have environmental measurements prior to 1970?__ < Yes_________ No / . __ \s Personnel Exposure Data: 1. When did the plant sta$t to work with VCM? Give year/ Q J . 2. How many employees are working with VCM? Give number f C> O. 3. How many employees are still working for you who once worked with VCM but do not do so now? Give number 4. Of the persons identified in 2 and 3 above give the number who have been exposed for the following time intervals. 23280002 -2- More than 1 and up to 10 years 10 and up to 15 years 15 and up to 20 years 20 and up to 25 years 25 years and more ______ I 1 ** _____________ ______ __________ _____________ ____________ 5. Of the persons identified in 2 and 3 above give the number falling within each latent period given below and considering only employees with more than one years service. A latent period is the time lapse from first exposure to the present date. More than 1 and up to 10 years 10 and up to 15 years 15 and up to 20 years 20 and up to 25 years 25 years and more // _________________ _________________ _________ _________ Data From Current Examination Programs 1. Give the number of persons who have been examined since . January, 1974. & t. 2. Were liver profile studies made? Yes No. 3. Did the studies include at least bilirubin, SGOT, LDH and alkaline phosphatase? Yes S No. 4. How many of those examined showed an abnormality in: one test _______ *7 two tests ______________ three or more tests 5. Have you had any cases ojipgiosarcoma? Yes No 6. Was this determination made by your own survey? Yes v No . 23280003 t f -3- 7. What per cent of the total exposed population was covered in the survey? `"3' ``P . 8. Were retired personnel included? Yes / No. 9. Were persons who had left your employ and gone to work elsewhere included? Yes No ^ 10. Did you review causes of death of those who died while still employed by you? Yes ^ No. 11. Did your plant participate in the Tabershaw-Cooper epidemiologic survey? Yes ' No______ . May 3, 1974 23280004