Document p2gK929rEOg6qBKkwRj9bkqyE
AUDIT-PC 1.51
? ^ Company: BPGOODRICH Facility. HENRY
Worksheet
Primatech Inc. Page: 1
Session: 1 08-10-92
Revision: 0 10-26-92
System: 4 DRINKING WATER MANAGEMENT
Category: RECOMMENDATIONS +--------------------------------------------------------------------t-t----------------------------------------------i
Dwg# :
;
question
;a;
remarks
: RECOMMENDATIONS
+-+
!Z, THERE IS NO DOCUMENTATION |THAT POTABLE WATER SYSTEM IS {"LEAD FREE".
Jp;
\\
|{
2. GENERATE DOCUMENTATION
! ; ; ; ; ! ; ; ; ! ! ! !
; { ; ; ; ; :
*------ + ; by ;
COMMENTS
{DMK[2. 11/92: NO RECORDS!
1 !ARE AVAILABLE TO
{
! !DETERMINE IF "LEAD |
{FREE" SOLDER AND
!
! {FLUX HAS BEEN USED
! {IN THE POTABLE WATER!
; ;system since june
;
! !19, 1986. A
!
: ;monitoring procedure;
! JWILL BE ESTABLISHED ! .
; !FOR LEAD IN THE
i
; ;potable water.
;
i ;notice will be
;
! ;posted for possible 1 ; ;lead contamination ;
! !IN DRINKING WATER. !
! !PROCEDURES WILL BE !
! !ESTABLISHED TO
!
; {insure that -lead
;
! !FREE" PIPES, SOLDER,!
; `.and flux are used in;
; ;all future changes ;
; ;to the drinking
;
; ;water system. (dmki ;
; !12/31/92.
!
| ; ; 3. 2/93: PLANT HAS !
; | !INITIATED A SAMPLING!
;
'.PROGRAM OF THE
!
; ; ! DISTRI BUT I ON" SYSTEM !
1 i ;and is currently ;
; ;WAITING ON ANALYSES.;
{ ; 1NO NOTICE WILL BE !
| ; ! POSTED UNTIL RESULTS',
; : [HAVE BEEN OBTAINED. !
;
! !POLICY HAS BEEN
!
| ! |WRITTEN TO PROHIBIT [
; ; ;use of lead bearing ;
; 1 |MATERIALS. ANALYSES !
; ; [WILL BE COMPLETED BY!
;
; :END OF FEBRUARY
!
;
! ;(DGFI 3/15/93.
;
; ; {4, 5/93: SAMPLES ARE; ; ! !ST ILL IN PROCESS OF ! ; ! '.ANALYSES.
{3. THERE WAS NO NOTIFICATION 1F:
; 3 . POST NOTIFICATION ;UMKi 5 . SF.E ITEM 2 ABOVE.;
NGC 12498
AUDIT-PC 1.51
Worksheet
Primatech Inc
Company: BFGOODRICH Facility: HENRY
Page: 2
Session: 1 08-10-92
Revision: 0 10-26-92
System: 4 DRINKING WATER MANAGEMENT
Category: RECOMMENDATIONS
Bwg#:
+--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------+ - +------------------------------------------------------------- t------------------------------------------------------
; QUESTION ;a:
------------------------------------------------------------------------------- -- --------- + -+
REMARKS
1 RECOMMENDATIONS +
;POSTED INFORMING PERSONNEL OF S 1
;the lbad content in the
;;
;DRINKING WATER.
!I
+ +--------------------------+
;by ;
comments
;
+--------------------------- --------------------+
14. THE FACILITY HAS NOT
1P1
;demonstrated that thewater
;;
!SYSTEM IS "LEADFREE". II
\\
1I I1
15. NON-POTABLE WATER SYSTEM ISJC!
;not labeled
:;
!4. ADDRESS . LABEL
;dhk;6, see item 2 aboye.;
MK;7. 11/92: A FLOW
J
1 DIAGRAM OF THE
!'
'.POTABLE WATER SYSTEM;
JWILL BE DEVELOPED BY!
|8/31/93. LABELING IS'.
'.PRESENTLY BEING DONE',
'. TO PREVENT
!
I INADVERTENT
[
I CONSUMPTION OF NON- '.
1 POTABLE WATER. <DMK)[
',8/31/93.
J8. 2/93: underground;
; DRAWINGS HAVE BEEN
[COMPLETED; ABOVE
;
| GROUND DRAWINGS ARE
;PRESENTLY BEING
;
iWORKED ON. 1ST
;
;QUARTER AUDIT IN
|1993 WILL INCLUDE |
!REVIEW OF LABELING |
lOF ALL NON-POTABI.F. |
I WATER SYSTEMS.
|
; ;9. 5/93: ALL ABOVE ;
I [GROUND DRINKING
;
[WATER LINE DRAWINGS ;
: ;have been completed.;
; ;(COMPLETEl 5/93.
;
_ +---+-------------------------- +
\2A99
AUDIT-PC 1.51
Worksheet
Pritoatech Inc.
Company: BPGOODRICH Facility: HENRY
Page: 3
Session: 1 08-10-92
Revision: 0 10-26-92
System: 8 INDUSTRIAL HYGIENE MANAGEMENT
Category: RECOMMENDATIONS
Dwg#:
QUESTION
; a;
3. THERE IS NOT A FORMAL HEAT STRESS PROGRAM.
;c;
i il
ii i
i ti
i
i
i
i1
t
t
ii i i ii
ri ii ti
ii
t t
il i|
ii ii
i4 <l
1i |<
ik 4
11
ri
i i
ii ii i
i
REMARKS
; RECOMMENDATIONS
[BY 5
COMMENTS
1
[3. ADDRESS 11 <* 1 t t 11
(J ^
\ i
1 11 11 1
1
1 l1 11 11
1l i\
;deg ;4. A PLANT SAFETY
1
a
POLICY WILL BE
it 1 ISSUED IDENTIFYING
41 !THE CURRENT TRAINING
11 5 PROGRAM PLUS
11 !ADDITIONAL
11 iADMINISTRATIVE AND
1 1 EQUIPMENT CONTROLS. 11 }(DEG) 6/1/93.
11 S. 5/93: HEAT STRESS 11 J POLICY HAS BEEN
1 !DRAFTED AND WILL BE
11 !ISSUED IN JUNE AND 14 1 ANNUAL AWARENESS 11 '.HEAT STRESS TRAINING
11 ;has been completf.d 14 IFOR ALL PLANT PEOPLE * '.DURING THE MAY 14 !SAFETY MEETINGS BY 11 I THE PLANT NURSE. 11 (COMPLETE) .
NGC 12500
AUDIT-PC i . -j 1
rumpaiiv : BFC00DR1vH Facility: HENRY
Works, fleet
Pninsi 1 *. c11 I nr.: .
Pae: 1
Session: 1 08-10-92
Revision: 0 10-26 92
System: 1 MANAGEMENT OF CHANCE
Category: RECOMMENDATIONS
Dwgfc:
+-------------------------------------------------------------------- + -- ------------------------------------------------*----------------------------------------------t-------,--------------------------------
; QUESTION
: A;
+-------- -------------------------------
REMARKS
; RECOMMENDATIONS 1 BY ;
COMMENTS
; 1 . WWTP V-NOTCH WEIR WAS NOT [CALIBRATED.
;
|1, CALIBRATE I [
[WJG[1. 11/92: THE V-
;
[ [NOTCH WEIR IS TO DE [
[ [CHECKED IN
[
[ [ACCORDANCE WITH
J
[
[ [CHAPTER 6 OF THE
[
[
[ [EPS'S NPDES
[
: [ [COMPLIANCE
: : [INSPECTION MANUAL.
: ; [THIS WILL BE
; [ [PERFORMED ON AN [ : [ANNUAL BASIS. A [ ; [CALIBRATION CHECK
[ ; [WILL BE PERFORMED [ [ [MONTHLY ON THE 1 [ |SECONDARY MEASURING : [ [DEVICES AND THE [ [ [COMPUTER READOUT TO [ ; [INSURE RELIABLE ; [DATA. (SDJ/WJG) : ; [12/1/92.
[ [ [2. 2/93: IN DECEMUER [ [1992, THE V-NOTCH
[ [ [WEIR WAS CALIBRATED. [ ; [THE REFERENCE FOR [ [ [INFORMATION ON [ [ [CALIBRATING PRIMARY [ ; [DEVICES IS THE NPDES [ 1 [COMPLIANCE ; ; [INSPECTION MANUAL. [ [ [THIS REFERENCE ; [ [COMBINED WITH VERBAL [ [ [INTERPRETATION [ [ iPROVIDED BY KEN I [ [NEUMANN OF IEPA [ [ [SUPPLIED ALL THE [ ; [INFORMATION [ : |NECESSARY TO CONDUC 1 [ [INSTANTANEOUS RATE ; ; [CHECKS. SEE IOC : : [12/16/92 FROM SCOTT [ [ ;JOHNSON TO DAVE
[ : [GIFFIN. COMPLETE
2. THE RADIATION SAFETY OFFICES HAS NOT BEEN TRAINED AND THE PERMIT HAS NOT BEEN !UPDATED.
[2.. TRAIN OFFICER
DEG[3. 11/92: TRAINING [HAS BEEN SCHEDULED [FOR D.E-GIFFIN THE [WEEK OF NOV 9TH TO
[ [
\
|
NGC 12501
AUDIT-PC 1.51
Worksheet
Prisaatech Inc.
Company: BFGGODRICK Facility: HENRY
Session: 1 08-10-92 System: 1 MANAGEMENT OF CHANGE
Category: RECOMMENDATIONS
Revision: 0 10-26-92
Dwg#:
Page: 2
I-
<1
--h
11
11
1I f1
QUESTION
-- 1
REMARKS
[ RECOMMENDATIONS
;by :
COMMENTS
;
+--- ---------------------------+
: !ATTEND THE TN
[
; [RADIATION SCHOOL.
[
[ [ONCE CERTIFICATION [
[ [HAS BEEN OBTAINED
[
[ [THE PLANT LICENSE
[
[ [WILL THEN BE
[
[ [AMENDED. (DEG)
! [4. 2/93: DAVE GIFPINJ
1 [WAS CERTIFIED BY
[
[ [TEXAS NUCLEAR ON
[
[ !11/13/92 TO QUALIFY [
[ [AS RADIATION
[
| [OFFICER. THE
[
[ [ILLINOIS DEPARTMENT [
; [OF NUCLEAR SAFETY [
[WAS INFORMED IN
[
; [JANUARY (1/20/93 > 0F[
;; [THIS TRAINING AND [
[REQUESTED TO
[
[ [UPDATE THE PERMIT [
[ [ACCORDINGLY. PROJECT;
| [COMPLETE.
[
3. ENVIRONMENTAL PROJECT? (IMPACT) ASSESSMENTS WERE NOT COMPLETED.
3. PROVIDE ASSESSMENTS
[ [5. SDJ IS SCHEDULED [
[ [FOR RADIATION
[
[ [TRAINING ON 7/18-23.[
[DMK',6. 11/92: ALL EA ' S , [
[ [AR'S, AND GPO'S NOW |
; [HAVE ENVIRONMENTAL [
[ [IMPACT ASSESSMENTS [
[ [INCLUDED TO INSURE [
[ [THAT ENVIRONMENTAL [
[ [CONCERNS ARE
[
; [ADDRESSED. COMPLETE [
[ [9/1/92
[
4. SCAFFOLDING WAS NOT INSPECTED QUARTERLY.
4. INSPECT
;deg;7. a pm maintenance ;
[ [WORK ORDER HAS BEEN [
[ [GENERATED TO INSPECT;
| [THE SCAFFOLDING ON A[
[ [QUARTERLY BASIS. THE[
[ [PLANT PRESENTLY AND [
[ [IN THE PAST INSPECTS;
: [PRIOR TO EACH USE OF|
; ;the scaffolding
;
; ;which is more
;
NGC 12502
AUDIT-VC 1.51
Worksheet
Pr imat.och Inc.
; ompanv . Bt tOODRI C.II Facility . HENRI
Page: 9
Session: 1 OS-10-92 System: 1 MANAGEMENT OF CHANGE
CateSorV- RECOMMENDATIONS
Revision: 0 10-26-92
Dwr# :
QUESTION
i1 *1 l
l 1
1
1 t1 1
r \
1i 1
l AREMARKS
11
1
t
1%
l1
11
\ S|
1 |1
1
1 1
11
tt
1*
t* *|
11 11
i RECOMMENDATIONS
' 1
i1
<*
I
1
{BY COMMENTS
: ;FREQUENT THAN
1
: ;QUARTERLY.
I
; '.(COMPLETE) 10/30/92.1
; {8. 2/93: DISCUSSED ;
; ;and verified the
:
; ; ABOVE WITH DDM ON
: :12/21/92 WHILE
:
; ;preparing for the
;
; 4TH QUARTER SAFETY !
; ;audit.
:
Session: 1 0S-1Q-92 System: 2 RESPONSIBLE CARE
Category: RECOMMENDATIONS
Revision: 0 10-26-92
Dw#:
; QUESTION
;a;
;i. THERE WAS NOT SUFFICIENT
_i
ii
; DOCUMENTATION SUPPORTING STAGE! 1
;vi PROGRESS OF THE RESPONSIBLE',
|CARE POLLUTION PREVENTION ;code. 1
i* ii
*i t i
*i
i
ii ii
i
i
i
I)
ti ii
11
i
i t
i i
ii
1
i i
i
11 t1 T|
1 11 1|
1 11 1 tI
1 11 1 1( 1 1 1 11
11 1 1*
1 t1 1 t1
1 1t
t 11
> 1|
1 1| 1 11
1 1
1| 11
1 1
11 i1
1 \\ 1 11
1 1| 1 1|
]
; >%
j 1|
-+
REMARKS
RECOMMENDATIONS
;BY }
COMMENTS
;i. PROVIDE AN UP-TO-',DMK;i. 11/92: THE
{
;date qualitative
; ;POLLUTION prevention;
{emissions inventory.;
ICODE INVENTORY WILL ;
i
i ;BE UPDATED AND
;
i i
i >
;SUBMITTED. (DMK)
1
i
ii 112/1/92.
}
;2.. EVALUATE
;dMKJ2. 11/92: AN
{
;POTENTIAL IMPACT OF J
!EVALUATION OF THE |
1 RELEASES ON THE
POTENTIAL RELEASE ON;
1 ENVIRONMENT AND THE ;
{THE ENVIRONMENT AND ;
[HEALTH AND SAFETY OF;
I THE SAFETY OF
1
;EMPLOYEES AND THE
}EMPLOYEES AND THE }
!COMMUNITY.
1 1 t 1 1 1 1 1 1 t 1 1
! JCOMMUNITY HAS BEEN }
1 1
;PERFORMED. THIS WAS j
( t
}PERFORMED IN
;
1 I
'.CONNECTION WITH THE }
1
}REQUIREMENTS OF THE }
1 t
{ILLINOIS CHEMICAL }
1 I
1 SAFETY ACT.
}
1 I
'.(COMPLETE) 1/1/92 }
J3. ESTABLISH
|DMK{3. 11/92: ONCE THE |
1 PRIORITIES TAKING *
I PRIORITIES HAVE BEEN;
; INTO CONCERN
[ [ESTABLISHED,
;
;POTENTIAL HEALTH AND}
{MEETINGS WITH PLANT {
iSAFETY IMPACTS.
} {EMPLOYEES AND THE {
1 t
1 I
|PUBLIC WILL BE HELD {
\ 1
^ 1
;to receive their
;
t 1
;RECOMMENDATIONS.
;
NGC 12503
AUDIT-PC 1.51
Worksheet
Prioatech Inc.
Company: BFGOODRICH Facility: HENRY
Page: 4
Session: 1 08-10-92 System: 2 RESPONSIBLE CARE
Category: RECOMMENDATIONS
Revision: 0 10- 26-92
Dwg#:
QUESTION
I A1 REMARKS
! RECOMMENDATIONS
1 BY 1
COMMENTS
*
11
11 *1
*
1
4
{8/1/93
41
1
1 i 1 14
a
1
41 4t
11
1
|4. 2/93: THE ABOVE ti
1
11 I1
11
1
4
{ACTIVITY OF MEETING ii
41 11 11 11 11 {WITH THE EMPLOYEES ti
11
(1
I
i
11
11
{AND PUBLIC IS DONE
t
i
11 it 41 <1 {ON AN ANNUAL BASIS 4
l1
11 1I
11
41 {AND IS NORMALLY
4
11
11 1i
4 4
11 {PLANNED FOR LATE
(
11
11 iI
i1
1
{SUMMER. PROJECT
4 1
r <
J1 14
1 1
1 1
{COMPLETE.
1 1
<
4t
1
11
4
1
i t
14 14
14. PROVIDE
;dmk;5.
update pollution
1 4
i i
11 i
!MEASUREMENT OF ON
i
{PREVENTION CODE
4 1
4
44 41
I GOING REDUCTION
i
{INVENTORY ANNUALLY.
4 4
i i
1t 1I
{PROGRESS.
i i
{(DMK) ANNUALLY.
4 4
14
1i
1
i i
4 14
4 4
i l
{6. CHANGE ABOVE
l 4
i 14 i 11
i 4
{NAMES TO SDJ FOR
4 1
t1 (
1
{GEON AND DGF FOR
1 1
t 4( i 1l
1 1
{SP&C.
1 t
+------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ 1- +--------------------------------------------------------------------- +---------------------------------------------------------------------*----------+---------------------------------------------------------------------*
Session; 1 08-10-92
Revision; 0 10-26-92
System: 3 SOLID AND HAZARDOUS WASTE MANAGEMENT
Category: RECOMMENDATIONS
Dwg#:
; QUESTION {A{ +----------------------------- ---------------------------------------------------------------------- 4 - *--------------
{1. HAZARD WASTE MANAGEMENT WAS{-{
{DEFICIENT IN SEVERAL AREAS.
(1
4 4
\ 4
1 4
11 1
{{
14 |
44 t
14 l1
14
' 1
41
<
1
1<
i1 11 i1
l 14 l 41
1 1
4<
1 1
l
1 1
1
1 1i
1 11
i
i| <4
li 1 1i
REMARKS
{ RECOMMENDATIONS {BY {
COMMENTS
{
_+--------- 4----- ------------------------ ------------- 4-
{1. ALL SEVEN {SATELLITE {ACCUMULATION AREAS {WERE NOT INSPECTED {ON A WEEKLY BASIS. {. ADDRESS
11 11
1 1
{ DMK {1. 11/92: THE PLANT {
1
4
{WASTE HANDLINC
{
44 {PROCEDURES HAVE BEEN',
4 4
{THOROUGHLY REVIEWED {
4
{WITH RESPECT TO RCRA{
< {GUIDELINES, BFG
{
11 {POLICY AND GMP STNCE{
{THE AUDIT AND
J
1 4
{CORRECTED
1 1
{ACCORDINGLY. ALL
4 {SATELLITE
{ { {
{ACCUMULATION AREAS {
{ ARF. NOW INSPECTED
{
i t
1 1
{WEEKLY BY AN SAE
1
1 4
{OPERATOR, THE
{
1 1
{PRODUCTION OPERATORS',
1 1
1 1
{ARE RESPONSIBLE FOR {
1 {MAINTAINING THE
{
1
( 1
{SATELLITE
1 l
r t
{ACCUMULATION DRUMS {
.
NGC 12504
AUDIT-PC 1-Jl
Company: RFGOODRICH Facility: HLNR1
Worksheet
Primatech Inc. Page: 5
Setis ion: System:
Category:
1 08-10-92
Revision: 0 10-26 -92
3 SOLID AND HAZARDOUS WASTE MANAGEMENT
RECOMMENDATIONS
D-rlgS :
QUESTION
1i 1* 1I 1
11 t* tl 1 11 1
I1 11 11 11 11 1I
i
t1
ii ii >
t
ii i1 1
i
i i1
t
*1 11 11 1i t i1
a *
ll
l
i
i j
A', 11 :: ;; |;
;: ;; ;; 1; ;i :; ;: :; ;; 1 !; :; !; I|
::
( 1 !; li ;i ;; :i ;; ;; 1
;; i: ;; i: ;i ;; !j ;; ;; [ [; ;; :i t ii !; !; ;;
REMARKS
; RECOMMENDATIONS
* ; ; |
Yi
COMMENTS
1
JIN accordance with
JRCRA REGULATIONS.
J(COMPLETE > 9/1/92.
1
: J J
;2. DRUMS OF ; HAZARDOUS HASTE ON
MK[ 2 . PROCEDURES HAVE [BEEN ESTABLISHED AND
[ THE FLAMMABLE
J TRAINING GIVEN TO
|STORAGE PAD HERE NOT
JINSURE THAT NO
1 LABELED WITH THE 1 WORDS "HAZARDOUS
|HAZARDOUS WASTE IS JSTORED ON THE
|WASTE" OR THE
;ACCUMULATION DATE.
'.ADDRESS. 11 11 1* 1
J FLAMMABLE STORAGE J PAD. THE SAE JOPERATORS ARE JRESPONSIBLE FOR J RECEIVING ALL !HAZARDOUS WASTE FROM J PRODUCTION`S [OPERATIONS.
1 J(COMPLETE) 9/1/92.
1 ',3. CONTAMINATED I MATERIAL, CONTAINED
DMKJ3. ALL DRUMS THAT [WERE HAZARDOUS OR
JIN DRUMS LOCATED ON J THE FLAMMABLE
JSPECIAL WASTE WERE J LABELED ACCORDINGLY
J STORAGE PAD, HAS NOT|
JAND MOVED TO PROPER
J BEEN DETERMINED TO
JSTORAGE LOCATION.
J BE A HAZARDOUS OR
J(COMPLETE) 9/1/92
JNONHaZARDOUS waste. JRESOLVE.
I ;
1 J4. ONE BULK
DMKJ4. THE BOX IN
JCONTAINER OF WASTE '.WAS IDENTIFIED AS JCONTAINING A
[QUESTION WAS LABELED [THE SAME DAY AND WAS [SHIPPED 8/21/92.
JHAZARDOUS WASTE BUT JWAS NOT LABELED AND
[THERE ARE [INDICATIONS THAT THE
J DID NOT HAVE AN
[ACCUMULATION DATE.
J LABEL. 1
1
11 11 11 11 1
1
1
[MATERIAL PRESENTLY [BEING DISPOSED OF IN [THE CONTAINER IS NO [LONGER HAZARDOUS [SINCE THE MATERIAL [WHICH MADE IT [HAZARDOUS IS NOW
[SOLD AS OPF-GRADE [PRODUCT. WE ARE IN [THE PROCESS OF [CHARACTERIZING THE
; NGC 12505 [WASTE. (DMK, SDJ)
AUDIT-PC 1.51
Worksheet
Priaatech Inc.
Cpmpany: BFGOODRICH Facility: HENRY
Page: 6
Session: 1 08-10-92
Revision: 0 10-26-92
System: 3 SOLID AND HAZARDOUS WASTE MANAGEMENT
Category: RECOMMENDATIONS
Dwg#:
QUESTION
11 1
i1 11 1
l 1 ll 11 14 11 l
4
11 11 1
4
1l 14 1 11 1
1l 11
t
;2. WASTE OIL WAS SENT TO A
I FACILITY WHICH WAS NOT
;AUTHORIZED BY BFG.
11 1
t1 f1 t1 11
: a: REMARKS
; RECOMMENDATIONS
[BY [
COMMENTS
[
i
11
14 [12/1/93.
|
i 11
ii
V
1c [5. 2/93: PROJECT
[
ii
1t
(1 [COMPLETE.
[
i1
i
IS. A DRUH OF
JDMK[6. PROCEDURES AND [
i
[HAZARDOUS WASTE IN
[CHECKS ABE IN PLACE [
ii
{THE LABORATORY
1 [TO INSURE THAT LIDS [
41
SATELLITE
11 [ARE CLOSED AT ALL [
11
[ACCUMULATION AREA
11
[TIMES ON SATELLITE [.
11
[WAS NOT CLOSED WITH
<
4
[ACCUMULATION DRUMS [
11
[A LID. REMEDY.
11 [EXCELPT WHEN BEING [
1< 11 l1 [FILLED. (COMPLETE) [
11
1
11 [9/1/92.
[
1 11 1
1
[t>. POTENTIALLY
[DMK[7. ALL DRUMS HAVE [
1
[REUSABLE MATERIALS 11
[BEEN LABELED
[
1
[WERE STORED IN DRUMS[
[PROPERLY ACCORDING [
11
[LABELED "SCRAP'' AND 11
[TO THEIR CONTENTS [
14
["WASTE" AT THE
11 [AND MOVED TO PROPER [
l1
[FLAMMABLE STORAGE
1
[STORAGE AREAS.
[
<
[PAD. CORRECT.
41 [(COMPLETE) 8/21/92. [
1
_ THE FACILITY
[7. CORRECT
1r DISPOSED OF WASTE
[
ii OIL AT AN Oil.
[
ii RECYCLING FACILITY [
ti THAT WAS NOT
[
ii INCLUDED ON THE ir FACILITY'S LIST OF [
ii APPROVED TREATMENT, [
i STORAGE AND DISPOSAL!
ii (TSD) FACILITIES.
[
[DMK[8. 11/92: PERMISSION;
11 [WAS RECEIVED FROM [
11 [JIM LEWIS BY PHONE [
1 [PRIOR TO SHIPPING [
11 [THE USED OIL TO
[
11 [SAFETY KLEEN. THE J 1 [DATE PERMISSION WAS [
l [GRANTED WAS NOT
[
1 [DOCUMENTED.
[
11 [(COMPLETE) 10/27/92 . [
Session: 1 06-10-92
Revision: 0 10-2G-92
System: -1 DRINKING WATER MANAGEMENT
Category: RECOMMENDATIONS
Dwg#
QUESTION
1 A;
[1. SAMPLING RESULTS WERE NOT [REPORTED TO THE STATE WITHIN [30 DAYS.
[-[ [| ;;
RECOMMENDATIONS ; BY
COMMENTS
[ 1 . RESOLVE
1
1
1
[DMK!1. 11/92: VOC DATA [
[ [WAS SUBMITTED IO THE[
[ [PUBLIC HEALTH
[
[ [DEPARTMENT.
[
! [ i CQMPLETF.) 10/20/89.;
',2. 'i'HF.RF. IS NO DOCUMENTATION ! 1 HAT POTABLE WATF.R SYSTEM IS
[P[ [;
[ 2 . GENERATE [DOCUMENTATION
[DMK[2. 11/92: NO RECORDS;
[ [ARE AVAILABLE TO
[
NGC 12506
3
ai:d i r- pc t . \
Company : BPGOODR1CI1 Facility: HENRY
Worksheet
r r t ma t nt:h Inc. Page: 7
Session: 1 08-10-92
Revision
System: 4 DRINKING WATER MANAGEMENT
Category: RECOMMENDATIONS
0 10-26-92
+- +
:
QUESTION
ja;
remarks
+-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------4 _ 4--------------------------------------------
I"LEAD FREE".
,
!j
D'wg# : RECOMMENDATIONS
|BY 1
COMMENTS
1DETERMINE IF "LEAD 1 FREE" SOLDER AND 1 FLUX HAS BEEN USED I IN THE POTABLE WATER ;SYSTEM SINCE JUNE ;19 , 1986. A 1MONITORING PROCEDURE ;WILL BE ESTABLISHED [FOR LEAD IN THE I POTABLE WATER. Inotice will be ]POSTED FOR POSSIBLE |LEAD CONTAMINATION 1 IN DRINKING WATER. I PROCEDURES WILL BE I ESTABLISHED TO ;INSURE THAT "LEAD I FREE" PIPES, SOLDER ;and flux are used in
;all future changes ;TO THE DRINKING :water system, idmki 112/31/92.
;3. 2/93: PLANT HAS ;INITIATED A SAMPLIN JPROGRAM OP THE `.DISTRIBUTION SYSTEM JAND IS CURRENTLY IWAITING ON ANALYSES !NO NOTICE WILL BE 1 POSTED UNTIL RESULT (HAVE BEEN OBTAINED. I POLICY HAS BEEN 1 WRITTEN TO PROHIBIT lUSE OF LEAD BEARING I MATERIALS. ANALYSES `.WILL BE COMPLETED B SEND OF FEBRUARY l(DGF) 3/15/93,
13. THERE WAS NO NOTIFICATION |P;
iPOSTED INFORMING PERSONNEL OF ; ;
1THE LEAD CONTENT IN THE
;'
+-+
14. 5/93: SAMPLES AR !STILL IN PROCESS OF IANALYSES. 13. POST NOTIFICATIO DMK ! 5 SEE ITEM 2 ABOVE
NGC 12507
AUDIT-PC 1.51
Worksheet
Primatech Inc
Company: BEGOODRICH Facility: 'HENRY
Session: 1 08-10-92
Revision: 0 10-26-92
System: 4 DRINKING WATER MANAGEMENT
Category: RECOMMENDATIONS
Dwg#:
Page: 8
I QUESTION
;a;
[DRINKING WATER. t
ti ii
!4. THE FACILITY HAS NOT 1 DEMONSTRATED THAT THE WATER J SYSTEM IS "LEAD FREE".
IP!
ti 11
i
t
tl
!5. NON-POTABLE
[NOT LABELED
ri
1i i
4
ii
t i
ii
i t
i
WATER
SYSTEM
is; c:
il ii
tl
t t
K1 %4
t1 1|
1 11
1| 1|
11 11
11 1J
1| |
1t tI
11
i 11
i 14
%i
1| 4i
i 1|
11
i 11 i fI
i i
1' 1I
4 1| <4
4 1| 1 1'
1 1> 1 44 1 4| 1 1I
1 1I 1 1I
1 11 14
11
l 1J 1 1 <i 1 41 1 11 ( 1I 1 1> 1 l1 4 1l 1 4i
REMARKS
! RECOMMENDATIONS
1
4
1
14 ADDRESS
1 4
1
1
4 C; .
1 4
4 1 1 1 1 1 1 4
1 I 4 4 1 1
1 1
( 1 1
LABEL
1 1 ' 1 1 1 1 1 4 1
11
1 1 4 1 1 4 1 1 1
1 1 1
1 1 1 1
Session: i 08-10-92
Rev is ion: 0 10-26-92:
System: 5 AIR QUALITY MANAGEMENT
Category: RECOMMENDATIONS
Dwg#:
|BY ;
1
11
COMMENTS
! 11
1DMKJ6. SEE ITEM 2 ABOVE.;
11 1I
1I
1 ;dMKJ7. 11/92: A FLOW
! !DIAGRAM OF THE
i |
|
'
I 1 POTABLE WATER SYSTEM;
1 JVILL BE DEVELOPED BYJ i ;8/31/93. LABELING IS J
; ;PRESENTLY BEING DONE;
; :TO PREVENT
J
| [ INADVERTENT
[
1 |CONSUMPTION OF NON- J
; ;POTABLE WATER. (DMK)|
: [8/31/93.
|
; ;s. 2/93: underground;
; JDRAWINGS HAVE BEEN ;
; ;COMPLETED; ABOVE
[
! |GROUND DRAWINGS ARE [
\ '.PRESENTLY BEING
;
I '.WORKED ON. 1ST
|
I !QUARTER AUDIT IN
;
: ;1993 WILL INCLUDE
; ; REVIEW OF LABELING
1 '.OF ALL NON-POTABLE [
: ;WATER SYSTEMS.
;
! ;9. 5/93: ALL ABOVE J
! [GROUND DRINKING
J
1 [WATER LINE DRAWINGS [
[ [HAVE BEEN COMPLETED.;
[ [(COMPLETE) 5/93.
[
; QUESTION
:1. THERE ARE NO WRITTEN PROCEDURES FOR ENSURING AIR POLLUTION SOURCE COMPLIANCE.
:a:
!(
REMARKS
1. RECOMMENDATIONS
!BY [
COMMENTS
[
1. ISSUE PROCEDURES | DMK | 1 . 11/92: ALI.
j
;EXISTING WRITTEN
[PROCEDURES WILL BE
|CHECKED TO DETERMINE
!IF PROCEDURES ARE IN ;PLACE TO INSURE
NGC 12508
AUDIT-PC 1.51
Company: BFGOODRICH Facility: HENRY
Worksheet
Frimatech Inc Pai?e: 9
Session: 1 08-10-92
Revision: 0 10-26-92
System: 5 AIR QUALITY MANAGEMENT
Category: RECOMMENDATIONS
Dwg#:
4------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------4-4-------------------------------------------------------------------- 4------------------------------------------------------------
I
question
;a;
remarks
; recommendations
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------4-4----------------------------------------------------------------------- ------------------------------------------------------------
4-------- ----------------------------------------------------------------------- 4
! BY !
COMMENTS
!
4---------4----------------------------------------------------------------------4
I 1 PROPER OPERATION OP [
: :the pollution
;
; [CONTROL DEVICES. ALL!
! iAIR POLLUTION
I
! !CONTROL DEVICES THAT! ! !ARE NOT INCLUDED IN [
! [WRITTEN PROCEDURES !
! [WILL HAVE A ! !PROCEDURE
! !
! [ESTABLISHED TO
[
[ [INSURE PROPER
[
[ [OPERATION. RECORDS [
[ [OF CONTROL DEVICE
[
[ [MAINTENANCE (WHERE [
[ [APPLICABLE) WILL BE
[ [MAINTAINED,
[
[ [(MEG.JDK) 8/31/93
[
[ [2. 2/93: ALL
[
[ [PERMITTED SOURCES
[
[ [HAVE BEEN identified;
[ [AND A LIST OF
[
[ [CONTROL DEVICES MADE!
I [FROM THIS, ALL
[
; [DEVICES HAVE BEEN
[
[ [IDENTIFIED IN THE
[
[ [MAINTENANCE COMPUTER!
[ [SYSTEM TO INSURE
[
; [THAT MAINTENANCE
[
; [RECORDS ARE
[
| [MAINTAINED.
[
[ [OPERATING procedures;
[ [FOR THE CONTROL
[
[ [DEVICES ARE PART OF [
| [THE NORMAL PROCESS
[
| [OPERATING PROCEDURE [
[ [AND ARE BEING
[
[ [FOLLOWED, COMPLETE
[
1 -4
AUDIT-PC 1.51
Worksheet
Primatech Inc
Company: BFG00DR1CH Facility: HENRY
Page: 10
Session: 1 08-10-92
Revision: 0 10-26-92
System: 6 COMMUNITY-RIGHT-TO-KNOW
Category: RECOMMENDATIONS
Dwgfc:
i---------------------------------------------------------------- --------------------------------------4--4---- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- ----------------------------- +---------------------------------------------------------------------4
4----------------- ---------------- ---------------------------------- +
;
question
;a;
remarks
; recommendations
;by ;
comments
;
51. THERE IS NO DOCUMENTATION
|4
tI
5THAT SARA 302 NOTIFICATION WAS! !
[SUBMITTED. 11
41 11 1
1 1
1t 4<
4
1 I
||
11
11 1I
t
14
11 I
!1. GENERATE
1 DOCUMENTATION 11 1
1
1 1( 1 t 1
4
DMK Jl. 11/92: A COPY OF
ri ;THE SARA 302 l {NOTIFICATION LETTER ii |SUBMITTED TO THE ii iSEBC IS ON FILE IN il JTHE ENVIRONMENTAL ii 5 OFFICE. (COMPLETE) i 15/6/87.
[ ; ` | 5 5 ! {
Session: 1 08-10-92 System: 7 HAZARD COMMUNICATION
Category: RECOMMENDATIONS
Revision: 0 10-26-92
Dwg#:
T
J
QUESTION
! a ! REMARKS
RECOMMENDATIONS 1 BY 1
COMMENTS
1
*
11. BOXES OF PVC DISPERSION
tl 14
11. CORRECT
5 DEG 11. THE GEON
5 STRAININGS HAD TWO CONFLICTING; 1
1 1
1 1
1 WAREHOUSE WILL BE
1 HAZARD LABELS.
ii i
1 1
1 4
1 AUDITED FOR
1 I
4l ii
1 1
1 1
1 NONCOMPLIANCE AND
1 1
li l
4 1
1 1
1THE PACKAGING
1 1
ii li
1 1
( 1
1 LABELING WILL BE
1 1
ii 11
1 1
1 4
1 CORRECTED. (MEG)
1 1
i i<
1 1
1 1
112/31/92.
1l 1 ii 1 4
I 1
ii li
1 1
1 1
12. 2/93: PACKAGING
1 1
li ii
I 1
1 1 LABELING HAS BEEN
1 1
ii ir
t 1
1 CORRECTED. COMPLETE
4------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ ) - i--------------------------------------------------------------------- H-----------------------------------------------------------------------4---------- 4--------------------------------------------------------------------- 4
Session: 1 08-10-92
Revision: 0 10-26-92
System: 8 INDUSTRIAL HYGIENE MANAGEMENT
Category: RECOMMENDATIONS
Dwg*:
1 QUESTION
:a:
11. APPROXIMATELY FIVE (5) 1 PERCENT OF TWA EXPOSURE 1 MONITORING RESULTS FOR VINYL 1 CHLORIDE EXCEEDED THE PEL 1 WITHOUT RESPIRATORY 1 PROTECTION.
1 4 1 1 1 1
ii
*
i
i< ii
ii ti
ii i
ti
XI 1
1
11
11 11 l1
REMARKS
1 RECOMMENDATIONS
; by ;
COMMENTS
;
;1. MAINTAIN FOLLOWUP IDEG;1. PLANT CURRENTLY
1 PROGRAM
( t 1
1 CONDUCTS BOARD OF 1 INQUIRES WHENEVER AN 1 INDIVIDUAL EXCEEDS A
;PEL WITHOUT
l 1
1 RESPIRATORY
1 1
|EQUIPMENT. ACTION
1 1 ITEMS DESIGNED TO
1 ELIMINATE THE OVER-
1 1
1 EXPOSURE ARE
1 1 GENERATED AND
;FOLLOWED UP OCCURS
1 AS PART OF OUR BOI
1 PROGRAM. < CONTI Nil I Nl
NGC 12510
AUDIT-PC 1,51
Worksheet
Primatech Inc.
Cbapany: BFGOODBICH Facility: HENRY
Page: 11
Session: 1 08-10-92
Revision: 0 10-26-92
System: 8 INDUSTRIAL HYGIENE MANAGEMENT
Category: RECOMMENDATIONS
Dwgt:
:
question
;a;
remarks
; RECOMMENDATIONS
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- --------------------------------------------------------------------------- +--------------------------------- --
| BY J
COMMENTS
;
------4---------------------------------------------------------------------4
S& COMPLETE )
{2. PROCEDURE FOR "YELLOW {LIGHT" ALARM DOES NOT ENSURE {EXPOSURES WILL BE LESS THAN {THE PEL.
ii ii
ii
ii
it ii
ii ii
i ii
i i
4i ii
ii ii
i it
ii ii
i VI
ii
ii i <i ti i ii ii ii ri it 14 i ii 14 f1 41 1| 1i 14 14
{3. THERE IS NOT A FORMAL HEAT {STRESS PROGRAM.
4
;c:
i i i i 41 41 1| 44
1| 11 41 1| 1| 1| 1t 14 1t 1 11 1|
!\ :\
,i
\
\
1 1 ii 1| 1| 1| 1| 11
1i 1t li 11
I;
11
: 2. CORRECT
; i
l i1 ll
i i
i
i i i
41
1
11 11 k
i 4 1
1 4
V k l i 1 i i i 4
1
: 3 ADDRESS
i t t i
i i i i i i i i 4 t 1
1 1 1
1 t 4 l 1 l 1 t 1 i 1
l 1 l 1 l l
1 l
t
{DEG {2. ALTERNATIVES ARE {
; {BEING INVESTIGATED {
; {TO INSURE THAT
{
11 {PERSONNEL ARE NOT {
I1 {EXPOSURED TO GREATER;
4k {THAN THE PEL WITHOUT
i i
USE OF A RESPIRATOR
i4 {WHILE PERFORMING
1 1
{WORK UNDER A YELLOW
4 r
{LIGHT. (MEG/RDM)
i i
{3/1/93.
i i
{3. 2/93: ALARM
il {LIGHTS HAVE BEEN
i i
{MODIFIED TO GO TO
i i
{RED LIGHT CONDITION
k i
{AFTER HAVING TWO
i i
{CONTINUOUS YELLOW
{LIGHTS. RED LIGHT
1 1
{CONDITION REQUIRES
1 1
{WEARING OF FRESH AIR
1 1
{MASK. COMPLETE
{DEG{4. A PLANT SAFETY
4 4
{POLICY WILL BE
1 1
{ISSUED IDENTIFYING
1 1
{THE CURRENT TRAINING
1 4
{PROGRAM PLUS
1 1
{ADDITIONAL
1 4
{ADMINISTRATIVE AND
1 1
{EQUIPMENT CONTROLS.
1 1
{(DEG) 6/1/93.
1 c
4 1
{5. 5/93: HEAT STRES
1 1
{POLICY HAS BEEN
1 1
{DRAFTED AND WILL BE
4 1
{ ISSUED IN JUNE AND
1
{ANNUAL AWARENESS
1 1
{HEAT STRESS TRATNIN
1 1
{HAS BEEN COMPLETED
1 1
{FOR ALL PLANT PEOPL
1 1
{DURING THE MAY
; {SAFETY MEETINGS BY
I {THE PLANT NURSE. : [(COMPLETE).
*
NGC 12511
AUDIT-PC 1.51
Worksheet
Pfimatech Inc.
`Company: BFGOODRICH Facility: HENRY
Page: 12
Session: 1 OB-10-92
Revision: 0 10-2G-S2
System: 8 INDUSTRIAL HYGIENE MANAGEMENT
Category: RECOMMENDATIONS
Dvgf:
QUESTION
;a; REMARKS
RECOMMENDATIONS
4. DOCUMENTATION FOR INVESTIGATING STS'S WAS DISORGANIZED AND INCOMPLETE
4. ADDRESS
COMMENTS
DEG^-^T PLANT PROCEDURE IWILL BE ISSUED {IDENTIFYING THE {ADMINISTRATION OF {STS'S AND HEARING {RECORDABILITY. THE {PROCEDURE HILL {INCLUDE THE {DOCUMENTATION {REQUIREMENTS. (DEG) {12/31/92.
{7. 2/93: DOCUMENTA{TION SYSTEM HAS BEEN {ESTABLISHED ALONG {WITH PROCEDURE. {COMPLETE.
Session: 1 08-10-92
Revision: 0 11-04-92
System: 9 INDUSTRIAL SAFETY Category: RECOMMENDATIONS
DwgjJ:
------------------------------------------------------------------- + - -----------------------------------------------t------------------------------------- ---- +
--------------------------------------------- *
;
question
;a;
remarks
; recommendations
;by ;
comments
{1. SEVERAL EXIT 1 ILLUMINATED.
/
11 1 1
(
1
t
41
l
t1 i4
l
t k
1 1i
t t i i i
SIGNS
WERE NOT{-{
1 1 I11 11
t1
| 1
| )
|1
41
1i
4 1
1
i |
l|
1 4114
4 t1 I1
|
*4
t
rt
*|
11
1
i
11 I1
1> 4 1 11
|
1\
t
1' |
i i i
+- - ----- ---------- ------
Ii
'1
(
{1. COMPLETE EXIT {SIGN PROGRAM
14 1 1 41 11
l
1
1 ^7
*
y1
i 1 % l l 1 i
i4
i i
{DEG;1. THE PRESENT
; {PROGRAM TO REPLACE
i i
{EXISTING EXIT SIGNS
i
'.THAT DO NOT MEET THE
4* {ILLUMINATION 1r {REQUIREMENTS WILL HE
l i
{COMPLETED ALONG KITH
l l
{THE AUDITING OF EXIT
i {SIGNS THAT ARE
4i {LOCATED ON THE
11
1
{DOORS. SIGNS THAT
{ARE NOT VISIBLE WHEN
11 1 THE DOOR IS OPEN
1 {WILL BE RELOCATED.
{ l DEG ) 12/. 31/92.
1 1t {2. 2/93: ALL DOORS 1t {IN THE PLANT HAVE 11 {BEEN RE-AUDITED FOR
t {PROPER EXIT SIGN
14 1 ILLUMINATION AND
t !PROPER LOCATION
{DURING THE FOURTH
; {QUARTER SAFETY
. . *
.. .
NGC 12512
AUDIT-PC 1.51
Worksheet
Primatech Inc
Company: BFGOODRICEt Facility: HENRY
Page: 13
Session: 1 08-10-92 System: 9 INDUSTRIAL SAFETY
Category: RECOMMENDATIONS
Revision: 0 11-04-92
Dwg#:
[
QUESTION
: a ; REMARKS
; RECOMMENDATIONS
:by !
COMMENTS
[
1 * i [AUDIT AND ADDRESSED.[
11
ii
i
l1
i
v
;complete
;
1 ii 1
12. PALLETS IN PVC SACK AREA
!WERE BOWED. 11 11 l1 11 1 t1
i
t
it
ii *i
ii
i
ii ii
ii ti
ii i
i
ir
ii
i
[2 ADDRESS 1
4
'4 11 1
1
11
11
11
;deg;3. the wooden
;
ii
;pallets that were
;
ii JBOWING IN THI5
!
ii !APPLICATION HAVE
!
ii !BEEN TAKEN OUT OF !
ii |SERVICE. IN ADDITION!
ii ;thb super sacks are
t i
J BEING STACKED IN A I
T 1
*i ii
1 1
4 1
;MANNER SO THAT
;
( 1
it ii
1 >
1 1
[INDIVIDUALS ARE NOT |
1 1
4 ti
1 1
1 1
[PHYSICALLY EXPOSED !
1 4i 1 i
1 1
[TO A SECOND LEVEL OF[
1 1
<i ii
t 1
1 [BAGS. (COMPLETE)
[
1 \
it it
1 \
1
[8/14/92.
ti
ii
l
[3. EYEWASH STATIONS WERE
i i
: 3 . ADDRESS
;deg;4. each production
;
iUNCLEAN.
ii ii
4
1 i
[AREA WILL BE
[
1 1
i ii
1
i
[RESPONSIBLE FOR THE !
1 1
i ii
1 1
i <
[CLEANING OF
|
t 1
ii i<
1 1
i
[EYEBATHS.
[
< 1
ii ii
1 1
i [LONG RANGE
[
1
ii ii
1
i i
[THE PORCELEIN
J
t 4
ii ii
1 1
i i
[EYEBATHS WILL BE
[
1
it ii
1 1
*
|CHANGED OUT WITH
[
tl 1
1 1
4 1
[MORE MODERN NON-BOWL[
1 1
tt <1
1 1
1 1
[DESIGNS. (MEG/JDK) [
1 1
11 41
1 <
1 1
[12/31/92.
[
1 11 1 1 (1
\t
4 t
1 1
[5. 2/93: EACH AREA
1
11 1I
i i
1 1
[HAS RESPONSIBILITY [
1
1i t1
i i
( 1
[OF EYEBATHS AND
|
1I c t
1 1
[QUARTERLY AUDITS
[
1 1
tI 1
i i
1 1
[INCLUDE CHECKINC
[
1 1
I1 1l
i
' 1
[THEM FOR
[
t 11 I 1(
1 [CLEANLINESS.
[
1 I
t t
J [COMPLETE
[
*---------------------------------------- ----------------------------- ----------------------------------,--------------------------- +
NGC