To: From: Sent: Subject:
Dravis, Samantha[dravis.samantha@epa.gov] lnsideEPA.com Mon 7/3/2017 2:28:54 PM InsideEPA.com's The Week Ahead
July 3, 2017 THE WEEK. AHEAD
EPA Weighs Comments On Stay Of Obama-era Power Plant Effluent Rule, TSCA Identifiers
EPA is taking input on a series of regulatory proposals this week, including its stay of an Obama-era utility Clean Water Act (CWA) effluent rule and the Trump EPA's proposal for how to identify chemicals deemed confidential under the new Toxic Substances Control Act (TSCA), among others.
READ THE WEEK AHEAD ->
Inside EPA's Week Ahead is published every Monday to help you stay ahead of the news curve on the major environmental policy changes happening at EPA and the federal level. EDITORIAL CONTACT
703-562-8763
E-MAIL ->
CUSTOMER SERVICE
703-416-8505
E-MAIL ->
Site Licenses Available
Want to share access to lnsideEPA.com with your colleagues? We have economical site license packages available to fit any size organization, from a few people at one location to company-wide access. For more information on how you can get greater access to lnsideEPA.com for your office, contact our Online Customer Service department at 703-416-8505 or iepa@iwpnews.com.
Please do not respond to this e-mail, as it was sent from an unmonitored mailbox. If you have a customer service inquiry, please contact us at iepa@iwpnews.com. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you can change your e-mail settings on lnsideEPA.com (you may need to log in).
Mailing address: 1919 South Eads Street, Suite 201, Arlington VA 22202
Telephone: 703-416-8500 or 1-800-424-9068
Copyright 2017 Inside Washington Publishers. All rights reserved About Us | Privacy Policy
Sierra Club v. EPA, 1:17-cv-01906
ED_001523_00006801 -00001
To: From: Sent: Subject:
Dravis, Samantha[dravis.samantha@epa.gov] POLITICO Pro Energy Whiteboard Thur 11/16/2017 7:50:14 PM EPA seeks delay on WOTUS in case Supreme Court lifts stay
By Alex Guillen
11/16/2017 02:48 PM EDT
EPA and the Army Corps of Engineers today proposed delaying the effective date for the Obamaera Waters of the U.S. regulation as insurance against the upcoming Supreme Court decision on the proper venue for litigation.
The rule, also know as the Clean Water Rule, was originally to take effect on Aug. 28, 2015, although it was stayed by the 6th Circuit Court of Appeals in October 2015. That stay, however, could be dissolved soon by the Supreme Court, which is expected to rule in the coming months on whether WOTUS-related legal challenges must first go through district courts or should jump straight to the appellate level.
In the event the justices choose a district-first scheme, the 6th Circuit's nationwide stay would end. Thirteen states would still be covered by a stay issued by another federal judge in North Dakota, but WOTUS theoretically would apply to the other 37 states.
"This step will allow us to minimize confusion" as the agency works on the repeal and rewrite, EPA Administrator Scott Pruitt said in a statement.
It is unclear when EPA plans to finalize its repeal of the WOTUS rule, though officials have indicated it could be before the end of the year. The rewritten version is not expected to be proposed until next year.
The proposal would move WOTUS' effective date until two years after the proposal is finalized, which would place it sometime in 2020, almost five years after the original August 2015 start.
WHAT'S NEXT: EPA will take public comment for just 21 days once the proposal is published in the Federal Register.
To view online'.
https://www.politicopro.com/energy/whiteboard/2017/11 /epa-proposes-changing-wotuseffective-date-as-supreme-court-weighs-veniie~ 101101
You received this POLITICO Pro content because your customized settings include: Energy: EPA. To change your alert settings, please go to https://www.politicopro.com/settings
This email was sent to dravis.samantha@epa.gov by: POLITICO, LLC 1000 Wilson Blvd.
Sierra Club v. EPA, 1:17-cv-01906
ED_001523_00006805-00001
Arlington, VA, 22209, USA
Sierra Club v. EPA, 1:17-cv-01906
ED_001523_00006805-00002
To: From: Sent: Subject:
Dravis, Samantha[dravis.samantha@epa.gov] EPA Press Office Sat 10/14/2017 1:51:19 PM CL: EPA Head Addresses Energy Issues
IN CASE YOU MISSED IT
EPA Head Addresses Energy Issues
Anna Wolfe October 13, 2017
ll8iiiHiiiiB|g8l^ |JJjlliiif(i||JllilililflJ
|iii|||liJ|jgBfii|Sti|BI^
||||f||j||l|||J|||lt|||li^ jjiljff||||||l|||ia||||jJ
|l|iBtfJ l|ItltlllIM lill fjifllOjlJOii i|f|g||Jtlllllljf
gMigieSMlliilMStM^
Sierra Club v. EPA, 1:17-cv-01906
ED_001523_00006807-00001
Sierra Club v. EPA, 1:17-cv-01906
ED_001523_00006807-00002
From: To: Sent: Subject:
Morning Consult Dravis, Samantha 9/28/2017 3:01:35 PM Presented by the American Forest Foundation: Tax Reform for Rural Forest Owners
This email was sent by: Morning Consult PO Box 27068 Washington, DC, 20038, US
Update Profile
Sierra Club v. EPA, 1:17-cv-01906
ED_001523_00006808-00001