Document o9wVr6vED7mK8KzBJX3Bvmn1D

1 // AO/MAJ Dooaohar 1957* 1hw.rL InPlltlQD Co. itt. Aabaatoala Btktlitiaa Es* iffl to.ida. .. Th*r# hara b*n 18 on*i ortifid hy tha Hadieal Board. 14 of tha* vara Bollar Covarora and 4 vara Spray Oparatora. 2. Aa to tha 14 Bollar Oorararai- (a) Thalr parlod of a*ploy*ant In tha Xnduatry rangaa fro* 20 to 44 yaara. 00 ill of tha* tharafor# hart haan jin!!!* MnalSninalotargSto1d9b"3a7c, kantaodubitohaoit^ad*natitaalainpoaffraiootdhtaaalbr affiorbaru. ttifa33awy2pelovrjh*ran tS JUibestoa Regulation* cim into operation. t(o) of tha 14 anplojnoayara allovad tr tha Kadloal. Board to continue working* 4 art itill working, and on* haa r*tir*d on a pnion* U) Only J of th*M 14-Bollar Oprtrcr* w* primarily BnogoetgyedanodnSnayrtihn*a** w*ionto***-1925r 1918 and 1917 rtrototirely* and two other** oenely Gjlbraltn and JlSlon ilnal 1918 and 1941 r**peotlT*lyi both of whSnuk* b**R Slowed by th* Widloal Boird to con- tlnna working* J, Ai to th* 4 Spray *as*si(a) st r.s.'(5S^siT- S4F"!"us^,:i1isra Sr the Radical Board to continue working, and ere gtlll doing so* W 7a*ooaynlt'haandokthheitretlwyo)*aeeeechihtahd*hatwdo?mybeacro*naceerrnreicd* up to tha dat* of *ertifieation and vere fir*t amlorad in 1944 and 1945* Oontd. foooo oo le onen i -2 OTM (a) In addition to the arguments which vt may fool ean bo batod on tbo atatlftloa tot out on tho previous page* wo should oonoldor what farther foot* and arguments aro arallablo to no* <b) for instance* aa rocards Spray operators* thoro is tho foot that M*Z*Co* hart oarrlod out Spray contracts on ' or# than 1*000 ships tinea 1941* and that tho ntabor of certified asbostosls eases among Spray operators (4 only) is extraordinarily --all* Incidentally, were all these 4 Spray operators encaged on marins work to a substantial decreet This la prob ably the position in the ease of Carnegie' Coyle and Langhlan* all explored in the Glasgow area, but possibly not In tne ease of Vhltelsv who was employed in the Manchester aree* f(e) Is regards the boiler corerera* If the statement on the prerlons page is correct and only were primarily engaged on serine work* the asbostosls risk again, seems extraordinarily small* and tbs oases whloh hare occurred are amongst employees with long service ranging baok to 1918* is it possible for I*XCo# to ascertain how many of tho 14 boiler oorerors shewn la the schedule were not encaged on marine work at allj or only to a very slight degreot (d) The wore wo man confine our statistics and arguments to men eftgaged in shipyards ths batter* as tbs question now under eonslderation only oonoems men to whom the Ship building kegulatlons apply# () In tbs past our sain argument always has been that there is no'iasbo steal* risk la handling or applying tbo finished goods# i*e* ths manufactured insolation products* As regards tbs 18 certified oases* when ths Spray operators and tbecasloyees with very long serrioe* including gerrloo before 1932# are eliminated from the list* very few oasts remain)^ it la nseessary to oonslder whether in general it can not still bo said that this argument remains valid* ,... V' ' r'