To:
Jackson, Ryan[jackson.ryan@epa.gov]
From: The Washington Post
Sent: Wed 7/12/2017 4:00:31 PM
Subject: [SPAM] Federal Insider: GOP House members hit Trump plan to break retirement promise to
feds on moral, ethical grounds
GOP House members hit Trump plan to break retirement promise to feds on moral, ethical grounds
By Joe Davidson
Rep. Rob Bishop (R-Utah) speaking last year. He opposes President Trump's plan to cut retirement benefits for current federal employees. (J. Scott Applewhite/AP)
You can't always tell a book by its cover or a politician's position by the party.
Rep. Rob Bishop is a Utah Republican known as a solid right-winger. Like many Republicans, he generally doesn't get good grades on federal workforce issues.
st recent ratings on congressional voting scorecards were 20 percent from the National Acti w ` r<d Retired Federal Employees Association c z r i, R percent from the American Federation of Government Employees (AFGE) and 10 percent from the National Treasury Employees Union (NTEU).
But wait -- while he has voted against positions favored by employee groups on many issues, he recently led a letter from nine Republicans opposing federal retirement cuts proposed by President Trump.
It's a principled position.
Citing the various ways Trump's budget plan would hit feds, despite his call for a 1.9 percent pay rai?d m fetter says "our strongest objection is how the proposals break a promise to employees and retirees who have based career planning on longstanding promised benefit calculations. They and their families don't deserve to be treated in this cavalier manner."
In addition to Bishop, it was signed by Reps. Tom Cole (UKla.), Austin Scott
Sierra Club v. EPA, 1:17-cv-01906
ED_001523_00002296-00001
(Ga.), Barbara Comstock (t-. )
to? ), Christopher H. Smith
(N.J.), Frank A. LoBiondo (N.J.), Walter B. Jones (N.C.) and Brian K.
Fitzpatrick (Pa.).
They oppose
an to:
: Lower retirement benefits by basing them on the average of the high five
: years of salary instead of the current high three.
i Abolish cost-of-living adjustments (COLA) for current and futon F deral
Employee Retirement L/stem employees.
: Reduce the COLA for Civil Service Retirement System (CSRS)
: employees by 0.5 percent from what the formula otherwise allowed.
: End supplemental retirement income for FERS employees who retire
i beginning in 2018.
: Increase individual out-of-pocket FERS payments by 1 percentage point
: each year until they equal the gove
nt's contribution. This would
I
to six years and would amount to increased payments of about
; 6 percent. Payments from federal law enforcement officers would
; increase by the same amount but would not equal the greater
contributions from law enforcement agencies.
The last point would be "tantamount" to a "permanent 6% pay cut," the letter said.
"I think we have a moral obligation to those currently in the system," Bishop explained during an interview. "That's the basis on which they wen Nied; that's how they are planning for their future."
The letter to House Speaker Paul D. Ryan (R-Wis.) and H<use Majorly
Leader Kevin McCarthy (R-Calif.) points out that these cuts have been
pushed before without success: "Recycling discredited proposals targeting
federal workers is disruptive to them, and demoralizing to all middle-class
civilian worker families." The House leaders have not responded to the letter,
and the
ip administration had no comment.
Bishop is not necessarily opposed to imposing less-generous retirement 'benefits on new staffers. "I can live with that," he said by phone. "I cannot go 'back retroactively and change those benefits. That's a philological position. ... Philosophically, I just think it is wrong."
Sierra Club v. EPA, 1:17-cv-01906
ED_001523_00002296-00002
Re pu bl ica n administrations. Wb m Mack Obama was president, he proposed increasing retirement contributions made by current employees.
"I was opposed to it then, and I'm still opposed to it," said Bishop, whose district includes 16,000 civilian employees at Hill Air Force Base, an Internal Revenue Service center and other federal offices. "The idea of making retroactive cuts ... it's not a conservative or liberal approach ... and I've still
/rong, regardless of who proposes it."
That's a position that brings his current effort praise from employee organization leaders who generally rate him low.
NTEU President Tony Reardon: "Their letter puts House leadership on notice that any effort to slash federal salaries and pensions will be met with fierce, bipartisan resistance."
John Hatton, N>
puty legislative director: "NARFE applauds the letter,
and appreciates that these members of Congress are highlighting for their
leadership the harmful and unfair consequences that would result from the
budget proposals targeting the earned retirement benefits of federal
employees and retirees."
AFGE President J. David Cox Sr.: "Through [Bishop ] leadership the military
facilities in Utah have thrived, as have the Department of Defense civilians
who have found
o be an honest broker and backer of a common-sense
approach to defense issues."
Sierra Club v. EPA, 1:17-cv-01906
ED_001523_00002296-00003
e GOP letter lag far behind the 100 on a similar
letter from House Democ < Bishop said he made no attempt to secure a
mass letter, preferring to include colleagues who reall
erstand the
issues. Apparently, not many Republicans do.
Once "the moral values and the ethical values" against cuts for current workers are explained to his colleagues, Bishop said "I think you'll find the s will be much more empathy" toward his position.
The Republicans' letter noted that veterans make up more than 30 percent of the federal workforce, meaning Trump's plan would hit those who have risked their lives for the nation.
The GOP members recalled previous workforce compensation cuts, including -- H me-year partial pay freeze, furloughs and higher retirement payments by new workers. "In total, these combined shared sacrifices by federal workers have amounted to $182 billion since 2010," the letter said.
"No one needs to remind us of the deficit and debt problem our nation faces, but federal employees are an easy political target," the nine Republicans concluded. "In more ways than one, they have already repeatedly given at the office."
But can they convince their Republican colleagues?
Read more:
[Many veterans would suffer under Republican health-care plan]
[Democrats hit feds' long-term care issues and Trump's planned retirement
[Trump's budget shows feds little love despite pay hike]
employee buyouts
Congress asked to raise payments to encourage federal
employees to resign or retire to $40,000 government-wide.
&^ifdfofederflg^
New TSP investment,
withdrawal options Changes are coming for Thrift Savings Plan investors, but not just
Sierra Club v. EPA, 1:17-cv-01906
ED_001523_00002296-00004
yet. By Eric Yoder Read more
Recommended for you
The Energy 202 Your daily guide to the energy and
environment debate. Sign Up
Share Federai in
Twitter Faceboo
Click here to view in your browser.
click here. privacy. If you believe that this email has been sent to y you no longer wish to receive email from The Washington Post, click hen
for help.
n error or tontact us
Sierra Club v. EPA, 1:17-cv-01906
ED_001523_00002296-00005