Document o9Lpzvz700NnxzbRQR6ro0Y07
ESIA
(- u r o p e a n S e rn I c o n d u c t o r I n d u s t r y A s s o c i a t I o n - Ref.Ares(2022)5318093.22/07/2022
PFAS in the semiconductor
industry
Meeting with
F.1 REACH
ESIA
ESIA Members
@ BOSCH
lllleC
embracinga better life
FONDAZIONE BRUNO KESSLER
F fj 'lim
Fachvc,t>and de, Clektro und tekuonikindustrie
intel.
ne><per1a
Fraunhofer MIKROElEKTRONIK
!II Globalfoundries
::\
::. : .S .:. ;:-iJ
LFOUn:::>V
Solutions for greatvisions
ENESAS s:itec
Hie.augmented
TDK
,lj TEXAS INSTRUMENTS
xJab
ZVE:I: Die Elektroindustrie
ESIA
The voice of the semiconductor industry
in Europe
Represent the interests of the European-based semiconductor industry and advocate for its international competitiveness. most R&D-intensive sector highly-developed global supply chain fierce competition & price fluctuation short in novation cycles multiplier for growth, electronics boost innovation global market estimated at$ 556 billion in 2021 (+26.2% yoy) Europe strongest market for automotive (29%)
EU ea. 10% of global market
direct employment 200.000 indirect up to 1.000.000 ESIA is member of the World Semiconductor Council (WSC)
ESIA
PFAS i n the SC industry
PFAS are used in low concentrations in
Specialty formulations in different SC . Constituentof
manufacturing processes, such as
specialty process chemistry formulations
photolithography due to their high
(photolithography,
technical functionality
chamber clean/etch, and other mixtures)
PFCs are used for etching
Direct criticality >13 types of distin
Photolithography and etching are the
uses/ material functionalities
fundamental basis of SC manufacturing,
making PFAS/PFCs critical for continued . Fluoropolymersin
SC manufacturing and innovation in
articles(component,
Europe
1r :;i:::d:, :ries,
The SC industry will need to obtain
insulators, capacitors,..)
appropriate derogations for PFAS
Sem iconductor manufacturing equlpment (HTFs) Fluoropolymer artic es In manufacturingeq uipment
and chemical distributon systems (filte rs, tu bing, linings, o-rin gs, etc.)
Factory infrastructure 'Fabs' Fluoropolymerarticlesin water purification,
chemicaldelivery and waste management systems (tank and duct linings, plpes,etc.)
ESIA PFAS in the SC industry
No feasible alternatives have been invented
Technical feasibility to support critical performance are key attributes of any feasible alternative
It is envisaged that it will take 1 O+ years to qualify and implement in practice non-PFAS alternatives with the same technical properties, after such an alternative has been invented.
For some applications, an alternative might never be invented
7 Fundamental Research and Invention
C:
f
,!::
supp_!!er R&D
Ramp to Production Manufacturing
',,=...;.:,;r
Years 10+
8
6
4
2
0
. R&D Exempti
ESIA
Risk Management in the SC Industry
Stringent risk management measures and safety practices to prevent release of chemicals during all stages of manufacturing
No release to the workplace environment during normal production
Closed system manufacturing equipment installed in a clean room
Automated chemical delivery systems create barrier between highly skilled workers and manufacturing process, protecting against chemical and physical hazards
ESIA
PFAS Consortium
The industry and its key suppliers have formed a Semiconductor PFAS Consortium to collect the technical data needed to better understand PFAS use in our industry and inform policy development, including:
Developing concepts by applying the pollution prevention hierarchy, where possible:
to reduce consumption or eliminate use of PFAS containing specialty materials, to identify alternatives for PFAS containing specialty materials, and to minimize and control emissions of PFAS
Identification of research needs, and Development of socioeconomic impact assessments
The consortium membership includes semiconductor manufacturers and members of the supply chain including chemical, material and equipment suppliers
ESIA
The way forward
Projects that are already in the public domain
Horizon Europe membrane distillation application (more information available here)
Semiconductor Research Corporation
US-based, includes ESIA member companies Collaboration between SC industry and academia More information available here
SC industry is prepared to invest more into R&D on PFAS
SC manufacturing: PFAS as a process chemical Emissions: Minimize PFAS release
ESIA
PFAS and the SC supply cha in
PFAS consortium has helped get the supply chain engaged in PFAS efforts
SC supply chain is global and consequently vulnerable to disruptions
Compared to SC industry in other regions where PFAS is not regulated, the European SC industry would be placed as a competitive disadvantage
ESIA
PFAS and the F-Gas Regulat ion
The F-Gas Regulation has been the one-stop-shop for F-Gases and has been successful in reducing emissions
Taking certain F-Gases out of the scope of the F-Gas Regulation and including them in the REACH restriction will cause disruptions
F-Gases for servicing and maintenance of refrigeration equipment
Now: Equipment with charge size of >40t CO2(e) banned starting 2030 Proposal removes differentiation of equipment with <40t of CO2(e) charge size Renders semiconductor chiller fleet obsolete in 2030 Quantity in each chiller is low, number of chillers is high, overall amount of
refrigerant is small and potential loss of refrigerant is low Strict measures in place to minimize fugitive emissions Potential environmental benefit is negligible compared to the resources
required to qualify new gases
ESIA
Questions to the Commiss ion
Extension of REACH Restriction Derogations
PFHxA REACH Restriction process is well underway In the RAC and SEAC background documentation, it was noted that an extension to the
12-year derogation for the semiconductor industry is only justified when manufacturers proviqe rtiore detailed information on substitution efforts and prepare detailed subst1tut1on plans What would such a review process look like for an extension of the derogation?
The legal aspect of the Essential Use Concept will not be part of the proposed REACH Restriction on PFAS
Nonetheless, essentiality will be used to some extent in the PFAS Restriction. How will that work?
The final RAC and SEAC opinion on the restriction of PFHxA uses a definition of "Semiconductors and semiconductor related equipment". Is it fair to assume that this also covers semiconductor manufacturing equipment?
ESIA
Thank you for your attention!
http://www.eusemiconductors.eu/
Twitter : @eSemiconductor Linkedln: European Semiconductor Industry Association