Document o2OV27NBgB11rN5JMm7EaK2D

Vista Chemical Company 15990 North Barker's Landing Rood Post Office Box 1902 9 Houston, Texas 77224 Phone (713) 531-3200 March 31, 1989 TGG; JCL: MMG; XF: l: AJO; Rp Mr. Don Segrest Cal Ink 1404 Fourth Street Berkeley, CA 94710 Dear Don: This letter is to update you regarding the status of Vista 47 Ink Solvent under California Proposition 65. This product is not covered by the "Soots, tars, and lubricant base oil. . ." listing, nor does it contain detectable quantities of the polynuclear aromatic hydrocarbons listed by Proposition 65. Detection limits for the listed polynuclear aromatic hydrocarbons range from 3.0 ppm to 0.5 ppm. Based on the above, Vista 47 Ink Solvent requires no warnings under California Proposition 65 requirements. This letter is an update for the letter I sent you on March 15, 1988. Sincerely, Thomas G. Grumbles, C.I.H. Environmental Quality Manager dlj cc: Chris Pierson Richard Laber Flint Ink 2511 Glendale Avenue Detroit, MI 48239 Steve Freeze B. F. Energy 359 San Miguel Drive Suite 204 Newport Beach, CA 92660 WV 000006995 R. D. Gamblin Memo March 31, 1989 Page 2 the International Loss Control Institute (ILCI) health and safety audit system. This was part of the project to improve industrial hygiene audits and develop a safety audit program. 11. A New Product Development/Product Liability Team meeting was held to review implementation training to date, make revisions in the training manual and further define the Phase II, Existing Products Liability process. 12. A meeting was held with Conoco and IT, the contractor working on the LCCC Groundwater Project, to review the final Rate and Extent and Source Determination Reports, and to comment on and revise the Risk Assessment and Groundwater Recovery Feasibility S tudy. T. G. Grumbles dlj