Document nkJLEOKkJ6QqpvqQmeNnmj4zX

BACK TO MAIN Analytical Report Fluorochemical Characterization of Sediment, POTW Sludge, and Landfill Leachate Samples Mobile, AL (W2151) Centre Analytical Laboratory Report No. 023-014s (Revision 1) Revision Date 3/28/01 Testing Laboratory Centre Analytical Laboratory, Inc. 3048 Research Drive State College, PA 16801 ~ 3M Environmental Laboratory Contact Kent R. Lindstrom Bldg. 2-3E-09 P.O. Box 33331 St. Paul, MN 55133-3331 Phone: (651) 778-5352 Requester Kris Hansen Ph.D. 3M Environmental Technology & Safety Services Bldg. 2-3E-09 P.O. Box 33331 St. Paul, MN 55133-3331 PAGE 1 OF 5 BACK TO MAIN 7 Introduction Results are reported for the analysis of a series of sediment, leachate, and sludge samples received by Centre Analytical Laboratories, Inc. (Centre) from the 3M Environmental Laboratory. The samples were collected from Mobile, Alabama and are part of 3M Project W2151. The Centre study number assigned to the project is 023-014. Specific fluorochemical characterization by liquid chromabgraphy / tandem mass spectrometry (LC/MS/MS) was requested for all samples. A total of 9 sa.mpleswere receivedfor analysis. The samples were prepared and analyzed by LC/MS/MS for the following list of fluorochemicals: Table 1:Target Analysis ComDound Name , Perfluorooctane Sulfonate Perfluorooctane Sulfonvlamide , Perfluorooctanoate Acronvm POAA The analytical methods used for originally developed for water samples and were validated by Centre. The water sample validation protocol and results are on file with Centre. The methods were modified for the sediment and sludge samples. The procedures have not been fully validated for these matrices. Data presented here is the highest quality data available at this time. 2 Sample Receipt The samples were submitted in individual plastic containers and were not preserved. Seven individual sample containers were received. Samples were received on 7/28/00. Sample collection dates were not supplied. Chain-of-custodyinformation is presented in Attachment C. 3 Holding Times The analytical method used was validated against a maxirnum holding time of 14 days in water samples. Stability after this time period has not been validaled. However, it should be noted that field fortifications in water and other matrices have shown acceptable recoveries at 100 and 1000 ng/L for periods longer than 14 days. PAGE2 OF5 BACK TO MAIN 4 Methods -Analytical and Preparatory 4.1 LC/MS/MS 4.1.1 Sample Preparationfor LC/MS/MS Analysis Water samples (leachate and field blanks) were initially treated with 200 UL of 250 mg/L sodium thiosulfate solution to remove residual chlorine. Solid phase extraction (SPE) was used to prepare the samples for LCIMSIMS analysis. A forty-milliliter portian of sample was transferred to a Cle SPE cartridge. The cartridge was fiirst eluted with 5 ml- of 40% methanol in water solution. The eluate was discarded and the SPE column was then eluted with 100% methanol. A 5 mL portion of methanol was collected for analysis by LC/MS/MS. This treatment resulted in an eight-fold concentration of the samples prior to analysis. For the sediment and sludge samples, a representative portion of sample (5 grams) was first extracted into 5 ml of methanol. The extracts were filtered and diluted to a final volume of 40 mL with Type I water. The diluted extracts were then treated in the same manner as the water samples, beginning with the solid phase extraction. 4.1.2 Sample Analysis by LC/MS/MS In HPLC, an aliquot of extract is injected and passed through a liquid-phase chromatographic column. Based on the affinity of the analyte for the stationary phase in the column relative to the liquid mobile phase, the analyte is retained for a characteristic amount of time. Following HPLC separation, ES/MS provides a rapid and accurate means for analyzing a wide range of organic compounds, including fluorochemicals. Electrospray is generally operated at relatively mild temperatures; molecules are ionized, fragmented, and detected. Ions characteristic of known fluorochemicals are observed and quantitated agalinst standards. A Hewlett-PackardHP1100 HPLC system coupled to a Micromass Ultima MS/MS was usedto analyze the sample extracts. Analysis was performed using selected reaction monitoring (SRM). Samples were extracted on 8/24/00 and analyzed by MS/MS between 8/26/00 and 8/28/00. The HPLC and MS/MS methods used for analysis and instrument parameters can be found in Attachments D. 5 Analysis 5.1 Calibration A 7-point calibration curve was analyzed at the beginning and end of the analytical sequence for the compounds of interest. The calibration points were prepared at 0, 25, 50, 100, 250, 500, and 1000 ng/L (ppt) for LC/MS/MS analysis. The instrument response versus the concentration was plotted for each point. Using linear regression with l/x weighting, the slope, y-intercept and correlation coefficient (r) and coefficient of determination (?) were determined. A calibration curve is acceptable if r 20.985 (?2 0.970). Calibration standards are prepared using the same SPE procedure used for samples. Calibration check standards were analyzed periodically (every three to five sample injections) throughout the analysis sequence. Compliance is obtained if the standard analyte concentrations are within +/-20% of the actual value. PAGE3OFS BACK TO MAIN For the results reported here, calibration criteria were met. 5.2 Blanks Extraction blanks were prepared and analyzed with every extraction batch of samples. The extraction blanks should not have any target analytes present at or above the concentration of the low-levelcalibrationstandard. For these samples, the extraction blanks were compliant. Instrument blanks in the form of clean methanol solvent were also analyzed after every high- level calibration standard, and after known high-level sa,mples. Again, the blanks should not have any target analytes present at or above the low-level calibration standard. For the samples presented here the instrument blanks are compl~iant. 5.3 Surrogates Surrogate spikes are not a component of the LC/MS/MS analytical methods. 5.4 Matrix Spikes Matrix spikes were prepared for every field sample usiiig all compounds of interest. Matrix spike recoveries are given in Attachment B. No field spikes were performed on these samples 5.5 Duplicates All field samples were analyzed in duplicate. Results are given along with the sample results in Attachment A. 5.6 Laboratory Control Samples For LC/MS/MS analyses, Milliq water was spiked with all compounds of interest at 25 and 250 ng/L during each extraction set. All recoveries for all compounds were between 70-130% in each LCS. Results are given along with the raw data in Attachments D. 5.7 Sample Related Comments Empty containers were submitted as filed blanks. The containers were treated with 40 mL of Milliq water and analyzed as per the method. There are no other sample related comments for this data set. 6 Data Summary Please see Attachment A for a detailed listing of the analytical results. Field blank water and leachate results are reported in parts per trillion (ppt) I:ng/L). Sediment and sludge sample results are reported in parts per billion (ppb) (ug/Kg) on both an as-received and dry-weight basis. 7 DatdSample Retention Samples are disposed of one month after the report is issued unless otherwise specified. All electronic data is archived on retrievable media and hard copy reports are stored in data folders maintained by Centre. PAGE 4 OF 5 8 Attachments 8.1 Attachment A: Results 8.2 Attachment B: Matrix Spike Recoveries 8.3 Attachment C: Chain of Custody 8.4 Attachment D: LC/MS/MS Raw Analytical Data 9 Signatures BACK TO MAIN Kevin J Lloyd, h e Prdsident Date Other Lab Members Contributing to Data Karen Smith PAGE 5 OF 5 a\Laboratories. Inc. CEntrE Analytical 36148 Research Drive, State College PA 16801 814-231-8032 FAX 814-231-1253 BACK TO MAIN Analytical Results W2151 Mobile, Alabama (GEN 016) 3M Sample Identification PFOS (ng/L) PFOSA (ng/L) POAA (ng/L) MC-413K Field Blank ND ND ND MC-414K Fieid Blank NQ NQ ND MC-435K Landfill Leachate ND ND ND MC-435K Landfill Leachate dup ND ND ND MC-436K Field Blank ND ND ND MC-445K Field Blank ND ND NQ Limit of Detection (LOD) for the procedure is approximately 2.5 ng/L for PFOS and PFOSA and 7.5 ng/L for POAA Limit of Quantitation (LOQ) for the procedure is 25 ng/L for all compounds ND - Compound not detected NO - Compound detected at a level between the LOD and LOQ. Result is not quantifiable. ND < LOD < NQ c LOQ - Please refer to the reverse side for our standard terms and conditions. a\Centre Analyltical ~~ Laboratorks. Inc. 36/48Research Drive, State College PA 16801 814-231-8032 FAX 814-231-1253 BACK TO MAIN Analytical Results W2151 Mobile, Alabama (GEN 016) 3M Sample Identification MC-410K Sediment Site 1 MC-410K Sediment Site 1 dup MC-411K Sediment Site 2 MC-411K Sediment Site 2 dup MC-412K Sediment Site 3 MC-412K Sediment Site 3 dup MC-444K POTW Sludge MC-444K POTW Sludge dup PFOS (ug/Kg) (as received) 0.224 0.209 0.557 0.454 0.505 0.463 1.78 1.71 PFOSA (ug/Kg) (as received) NQ NQ 0.305 0.273 0.405 0.388 NQ NQ POAA (ug/Kg) (as received) NQ NQ ND ND NQ NQ NQ NQ 3M Sample Identification MC-410K Sediment Site 1 MC-410K Sediment Site 1 dup MC-411K Sediment Site 2 MC-411K Sediment Site 2 dup MC-412K Sediment Site 3 MC-412K Sediment Site 3 dup MC-444K POTW Sludge MC-444K P O W Sludge dup PFOS (ug/Kg) (dry weight) 0.303 0.282 0.699 0.57 0.67 0.61 6 60 57.7 PFOSA (ug/Kg) (dry weight) NQ NQ 0.383 0.343 0.538 0.516 NQ NQ POAA (ug/Kg) (dry weight) NQ NQ ND ND NO NQ NQ NQ Limit of Detection (LOD) for the procedure is approximately 0.08 ug/Kg for all cornpourids (as received) Limit of Quantitation (LOO) for the procedure is 0.20 ug/Kg for all compounds (as receiwed) ND - Compound not detected NQ - Compound detected at a level between the LOD and LOQ. Result is not quantifiable. ND c LOD c NQ c LOQ % Solids 74.01 74.01 79.65 79.65 75.29 75.29 2.97 2.97 - Please refer to the reverse side for our standard te,rmsand conditions. BACK TO MAIN Attachment B: LC/MS/MS Laboratory Spike Recovery Spiked Amount (ng/L): I 250 PFOS PFOSA POAA Sample Concentration (ng/L) 28.0 6.8 8.6 Matrix Spike Result (ng/L) 236 21 3 224 Matrix Spike Result (% Recovery) 83.2 82.5 86.2 Criteria (Pass / Fail) PASS PASS PASS Lower Recovery Limit: Upper Recovery Limit: [ 70 130 1 Note: Sample results less than 25 ng/L are reported as NQ in the results section as they are below the limit of quantitation. Results are given in this table for recovery calculations only. Concentrations represent amounts present in the sample extract BACK TO MAIN Attachment B: LC/MS/MS Laboratory Spike Recovery PFOS PFOSA POAA Sample Concentration (ngU 69.6 38.1 0 Matrix Spike Result (n!m 270 244 201 Lower Recoverv Limit: 1, 70 I Upper Recovery Limit: I, 130 I I Concentrations represent amounts present in the sample extract Matrix Spike Result (YoRecovery) 80.2 82.4 80.4 Criteria (Pass / Fail) PASS PASS PASS BACK TO MAIN Attachment B: LC/MS/MS Laboratory Spike R:ecovery Sample ID: I MC-412K I Spiked Amount (ng/L): I 250 I PFOS PFOSA POAA Sample Concentration (ng/L) 63.1 50.6 9.0 Matrix Spike Result (ng/L) 27 1 259 238 Matrix Spike Result (% Recovery) 83.2 83.4 91.6 Criteria (Pass / Fail) PASS PASS PASS Lower Recovery Limit: I 70 1 Upper Recovery Limit: I 130 I Note: Sample results less than 25 ng/L are reported as NQ in the results section as they are below the limit of quantitation. Results are given in this table for recovery calculations only. Concentrations represent amounts present in the sample extract BACK TO MAIN Attachment B: LC/MS/MS Laboratory Spike Recovery Sample ID: I MC-444K 1 Spiked Amount (ng/L): 1 250 1 PFOS PFOSA POAA Lower Recovery Limit: Upper Recovery Limit: Sample Concentration (ng/L) 223 8.3 16.6 I 70 1 130 Matrix Spike Result (ng/L) 406 55.8 234 Matrix Spike Result (% Recovery) 73.2 19.0 87.0 Criteria (Pass / Fail) PASS FAIL PASS Note: Sample results less than 25 ng/L are reported as NQ in the results section as they are below the limit of quantitation. Results are given in this table for recovery calculations only. Concentrations represent amounts present in the sample extract BACK TO MAIN Attachment B: LC/MS/MS Laboratory Spike Recovery PFOS I PFOSA ~ POAA Sample Concentration (ng/L) 0 0 0 Matrix Spike Result (ng/L) 94.6 93.9 104 Lower Recovery Limit: I Upper Recovery Limit: I 70 1 130 1 Matrix Spike Result (% Recovery) 94.6 93.9 104.0 Criteria (Pass / Fail) PASS PASS PASS BACK TO MAIN a Environmental Laboratory Form 38778 - PWO ShiDdna Address: 3M Bldg 2-3E-09 Tdephn".: Sample Receiving: (651) 7784946 Chain of Custody /Request for Laboratory Analytical Project IDlProject Name 01r, M&:L p!L Template # Finh Report Due Date 15091 935 Bush Avenue SI Paul.Mt4 55106 Alternate: (651) 778-6753 FAX: (651) 778-6176 Contact Name c1 3 )sa Company iY-) Bid? Mailing Address emn 2-39-04 Project Lead k&J ,HCIJ?QA~, Dept. # (main) q29 1 Internal Due Date 1 Date Available 9 35 0cAs;rr,&&> Date Due City, State. Zip 5c -, ?Q IO fu%*Ct . Contract Lab 3M Env. Lab Project # For Internal Use Only Spacial Instructions andlor Specific Regulalory Requirements: method, lmil ofdeledmn. repoflmg units, etc ) Analysis Requested: Complete below. Attach any associaled Informstlon. n LL Q L. I-L 'I 0 s0-a / I I 10. I Kf//u /&&)/hx/h s Collected by (print) ZI 0 item f In. rhm / =0c 1-9 .0E- m 6 W . M- Relinquished by/Affiliation - 3m I I I Time Date Colleclor's signature -/ Shlpped Via: ( K h ? M/u-en 'Received by/Afftliation ./ . I s , 74,242- Time //d@ Date 7-29-2 Original - A m p a n y i n g Samples Last Page - Originalor See Reverse Side for Instructions